How many babies die a year because they did not get BCASH shipments?

[Anonymous No.8879192]

[Anonymous No.8879506]

>>8879192
I think his argument was that lack of economic freedom caused babies to die, which is true.

[Anonymous No.8879528]

>>8879192
All of them anon...

All of them.

[Anonymous No.8879581]

>>8879192
Bcash kills babies too. knew it was bad crypto but not this bad

[Anonymous No.8879626]

>>8879506
>people shitting on bcash = depriving people of economic freedom

You're a retard.

[Anonymous No.8879640]

>>8879626
Your the one who cant acknowledge a valid point because you hate the person who said it.

[Anonymous No.8879654]

>>8879626
I don't think you watched the debate. If you did, your ADHD or dyslexia is preventing you from understanding his argument. Get help.

[Anonymous No.8879660]

>>8879640
That point would be retarded even if it was made by anyone other than Roger Ver.

In fact the only reason people are defending him is because he's Roger Ver.

[Anonymous No.8879691]

>>8879640
>>8879654
That was literally his point.
Opponents were making use of their economic freedom to shit on Bcash, and according to him that meant people were deprived of economic freedom (and children of life).

Stop being retarded.

[Anonymous No.8879696]

>>8879660
>In fact the only reason people are defending him is because he's Roger Ver.
I'm not defending him, I'm just trying to be fair. He didn't say that Bcash could save children, his point was about economic freedom and child mortality.

[Anonymous No.8879717]

>>8879691
Watch the debate before commenting

[Anonymous No.8879727]

>>8879691
>Opponents were making use of their economic freedom to shit on Bcash, and according to him that meant people were deprived of economic freedom (and children of life).
Kek you really didn't understand his argument, holy shit! Hilarious! Get help, man. You may have ADHD.

[Anonymous No.8879736]

>>8879192
>How many humans die a year because they did not get BCASH shipments?
retards don't count

[Anonymous No.8879742]

>>8879506
This should be the Bcash logo

[Anonymous No.8879748]

>>8879696
His point was that Bcore should stop sabotaging him.
That them doing so was causing people to die.

>>8879717
I did watch it.

>>8879727
Nice argum...
oh

[Anonymous No.8879779]

>>8879696
>his point was about economic freedom and child mortality
And how does this relate to Bcash?

[Anonymous No.8879793]

>>8879748
No his point was they deliberately slowed down and actually regressed btcs adoption and scaling. Resulting in the creation of bch and setting everything back years. Which if you saw his other presentation he had a clear argument for less economic freedom over time resulting in higher infant mortality. 1+1=2 if you actually watched the debate you wouldn't need me to explain this to you.

[Anonymous No.8879798]

>>8879748
You absolutely distorted his argument.
His argument is very simple:
Countries that have less economic freedom have higher child mortality rates. In other words, there's a negative correlation between levels of economic freedom and child mortality.

That's it. Then he said that because Bcash's fees are lower than Bitcoin's, it's more likely to be adopted in poor countries with less economic freedom. It's not so hard to understand, I'm sure you'll get the idea at some point.

[Anonymous No.8879817]

>>8879779
See >>8879798

[Anonymous No.8879833]

>>8879793
>>8879779
>>8879748
>>8879742
>>8879736
>>8879727
>>8879696
>>8879691

Pic related.

[Anonymous No.8879839]

>>8879798
>>8879793
>>8879833

Oh shut the fuck up. We all know he has a larger stake in bcash ponzi then the bitcoin ponzi and just started spewing retardation to make more money if he dumped.

[Anonymous No.8879848]

>>8879793
>No his point was they deliberately slowed down and actually regressed btcs adoption and scaling.
How?
By stopping Ver from working on his project?

>>8879798
>>8879817
>>8879833
You have to be psychotic to claim children are dying because your shitcoin is getting resistance.

[Anonymous No.8879866]

>>8879848
Stop talking and do more research. It's very clearly lined out for you.
>>8879848
>i can't argue with his logic so he must be dishonest
ok

[Anonymous No.8879882]

>>8879866
2nd meant for frog faggot>>8879839

[Anonymous No.8879892]

>>8879866
Roger's shitcoin is getting resistance, so he resorts to the most extreme form of guilt trip he could think of: "children are dying because you don't like my shit".
Fucking lmao.

[Anonymous No.8879898]

>>8879839
>We all know he has a larger stake in bcash ponzi then the bitcoin ponzi
Yes, definitely, he also still has a huge Bitcoin stake, and there's no question that he's pumping his own investments. Still, to be fair with the guy, he is right in saying that lack of economic freedom is correlated with child mortality.

Also, people make $4 a day on average simply can't afford Bitcoin's transfer fees. He's right on that point as well. High fees inhibit adoption. That's all I have to say.

[Anonymous No.8879910]

>>8879892
>i have no idea how crypto even works yet i'm still talking pretending like I have the slightest clue

[Anonymous No.8879936]

>>8879910
It's logical for you to defend the undefendable when your money is on the line.

But just know you're not fooling anyone. Roger is a petulant child with extreme narcissism.
Borderline psychopathic.

>children are dying because you don't like my shit
lmao

[Anonymous No.8879962]

>>8879898
>he is right in saying that lack of economic freedom is correlated with child mortality.
To think he holds the key to economic freedom is megalomaniac.

[Anonymous No.8880013]

>>8879962
>To think he holds the key to economic freedom
He never said that. His point was that you need to design cryptocurrencies with low fees, otherwise they won't be useful as an instrument for increasing economic freedom.

[Anonymous No.8880028]

>>8880013
>He never said that
Then why is he saying children are dying due to the resistance to his project?

[Anonymous No.8880030]

>>8879936
Undefendable? His logic and reasoning is sound. You can't attack that obviously and you didn't even understand what his argument actually was until it was laid out for you. It seems like you still somehow don't get it based off >>8879962 and are resorting to the typical ad hominem. Even if you don't like the means if the end goal is worldwide adoption and economic freedom across the world, wouldn't that give it much better speculative value?

[Anonymous No.8880041]

>>8880028
He didn't say that. He said children are dying because of lack of economic freedom.
Get tested for ADHD asap.

[Anonymous No.8880045]

>>8880013
why would anyone even want to use bitcoin to send money all over the world when fees are over 50 dollars and confirmation times take hours. That is why core trolls are so deluded.

[Anonymous No.8880066]

>>8880030
>His logic and reasoning is sound.
Stop.
He's a psychopathic manchild.
Nobody is dying because Bcash gets shit on. Not until he goes on a murderous rampage because his ego got hurt.

>>8880041
>He said children are dying because of lack of economic freedom.
He does not hold the definitive key to economic freedom. He has no place saying this shit.

[Anonymous No.8880093]

IT'S NOT BCASH

[Anonymous No.8880120]

>>8880066
>ad hom
>ad hom
How do you still not get the fucking argument? Waste of my time.

[Anonymous No.8880132]

>>8880120
His argument:

>people die more without economic freedom
>only I can provide economic freedom
>therefore: people die more without my solution

psychopathic

[Anonymous No.8880142]

>>8880066
>He does not hold the definitive key to economic freedom
>>8880013

[Anonymous No.8880158]

>>8880142
If he never said that, then why did he say children were dying in a Bcore vs Bcash debate?

[Anonymous No.8880172]

holy shit i didnt think us real bitcoiners would trigger you faggots so hard. this is too good

[Anonymous No.8880176]

>>8880158
its the argument that stagnation prevents technology development which translates to more death relatively

it's loose with bch

[Anonymous No.8880177]

>>8880132
>His argument:
>>people die more without economic freedom
This is true. See >>8879833

>>only I can provide economic freedom
False. He never said that. He says cryptocurrencies can INCREASE economic freedom, as long as they have low fees and thus are affordable.

>>therefore: people die more without my solution
He never said that.

>psychopathic
Ad hominem argument.

[Anonymous No.8880178]

Another day, another corekek fud thread, another 0 threads on BTC developments. Their desperation is getting laughable.
In January I predicted that BCH and ETH will flip segwit core EOY. Now I'm convinced that Cardano, EOS, Universa and Dash will do the same.
LTC will be out of the top 50.

[Anonymous No.8880185]

>>8880178
they are getting so mad its hilarious. theres literally nothing they can do

[Anonymous No.8880186]

>>8880177
He said children were dying as an argument for his solution, which in his mind saves children's lives.
Snap out of it.

[Anonymous No.8880225]

>>8880186
>He said children were dying as an argument for his solution, which in his mind saves children's lives.
Watch the debate.

As I said, you might be interested in getting tested for ADHD, it doesn't look like you are able to sustain attention for long periods of time. This could be impairing your listening comprehension.

[Anonymous No.8880240]

>>8880225
I did.

Ver said "children are dying" as an argument in favor of his solution.

[Anonymous No.8880291]

>>8880240
He didn't say that. But I'm not going to repeat what I posted earlier, you won't change your mind.

Try to watch the debate again. Take a deep breath and try to understand what he is saying, calmly. Maybe you can rewind the video and watch the important parts more than once until you get it. Best of luck.

[Anonymous No.8880340]

>2015 Roger Ver's first attempt to co-opt Bitcoin is when he started Bitcoin XT, using blocksize arguments. It failed.

[Anonymous No.8880491]

>>8880291
>He didn't say that.
He brought up the fact that children were dying in a direct confrontation between two versions of Bitcoin.

That is pure lunacy.

[Anonymous No.8880603]

Cashies are completely retarded. This thread proves it once again.

[Anonymous No.8880611]

At this point, it's either that corekeks have sub 70 iq, or it's really cashies pretending to be corekek retards to lower the trust in btc even further.

[Anonymous No.8881279]

Off to a slow start but this will still be a good year for BCH