/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.8748463]

Is REQ the most undervalued crypto out there right now?

[Anonymous No.8748486]

>>8748463
Do not believe his lies brothers !
HE HAS BAGS !

[Anonymous No.8748528]

>>8748486
this fud will be the end of me...

[Anonymous No.8748531]

I just emailed ledger about possibly partnering up with REQ so they can enable burn guard

lets hope for the best

[Anonymous No.8748596]

>>8748528
Wtf does it DO ?
Shit.
And it burns.
And the fucking mcap is $100 fucking millions.
Are you that far away gone !!??
Cut it the fuck out with this threads.
Remember: IT DOESN'T DO SHIT !

[Anonymous No.8748637]

Is genesis vision better than REQ?

please dont tell me I invested in the wrong distributed ledger

[Anonymous No.8748647]

>>8748596
Yeah it does shit.
An its the only coin that burns.
Shure.

[Anonymous No.8748659]

Was thinking about buying $1000 worth yesterday. I hesitated but now today that buys 6.7k req instead of yesterday's 5.8k with same amount

I'm just tired of this market tanking

[Anonymous No.8748669]

>>8748596
It's one of the only coins out there that actually does anything you nignog

[Anonymous No.8748684]

>>8748531
Yawn

[Anonymous No.8748685]

>>8748637
I hold both

[Anonymous No.8748703]

>>8748669
whats the other 4? OMG VEN LINK RLC?

[Anonymous No.8748727]

>>8748659
Wait until $6k BTC at least my bro. Be patient. True capitulation has not set in yet.

[Anonymous No.8748728]

>>8748703
For me: XMR, BTC, ETH... basically that's it for me atm

[Anonymous No.8748739]

>>8748727
Thanks, i appreciate it

[Anonymous No.8748761]

It is completely ridiculous it is down in the 90s on CMC. It's fine it allows smart people to buy it cheaply and be literal millionaires when it inevitably takes off. Y Combinator involvement alone should make you buy. A few calls and suddenly pay by request is on all your favorite websites.

[Anonymous No.8748792]

>>8748727
It's close. But 5,700 will be it.

[Anonymous No.8748806]

nope. universa is

[Anonymous No.8748813]

>>8748761
This is exactly my reasoning...partnering with Governments, Y Combinator, PwC the auditing and account I mean how in the name of fuck is this so low... The volume on Binance is non existant even in this hellish pit just cannot see why I'm the only one accumulating... feel like I must be missing something

[Anonymous No.8748842]

>>8748596
>it doesn't do shit

It is pretty much a more advanced, more decentralized version of OmiseGO you spaz.

[Anonymous No.8748853]

>>8748761
request is seasonal coin.
they are mostly being sold in winter when people buy them to heat their homes. now, not that much maybe for some bbq here and there. it might spike for 4th of july but that's it

[Anonymous No.8748874]

ripple is the most undervalued crypto. req costs exactly wha it should

[Anonymous No.8748876]

>>8748728
but none of those do anything...

[Anonymous No.8748904]

>>8748813
>>8748761
Its a pajeet bro, no one wants pajeet shit

[Anonymous No.8748915]

>>8748874
Ripple has a 20 billion dollar marketcap... It's still number 3 on CMC, I agree that it's probably undervalued but not as much as REQ

[Anonymous No.8748919]

>>8748813

You're missing nothing. You're just early to the party.
You'll have to sir around awkwardly for a while with people you have no interest in and it'll be boring.
But once the party gets going, you'll be getting your dick sucked by a different 10/10 every half hour.

[Anonymous No.8748950]

>>8748813
same

I dunno if I should wait some more to dump it more or just accumulate like a madman now

[Anonymous No.8748952]

>>8748463
>https://www.coindesk.com/blockchain-token-velocity-problem/

no Request is an interesting project no doubt, but the REQ token is garbage and has no reason to exist. Article helps to explain

[Anonymous No.8749001]

>>8748813
Look at it in the positive.

If you're so show this is something massive in a few years (I also believe) then you literally have so much time to pick up an insane amount of REQ and shitpost on /biz/ in 4/5 years about how you quit your job and get to dump your bags on late comers during the next bubble

[Anonymous No.8749018]

>>8748952
To take fees, for funding and governance? It does totally have reason to exist...

[Anonymous No.8749069]

>>8748853

Damn dude hahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.8749084]

>>8748853
Next level

[Anonymous No.8749150]

one of the dumbest and most unnecessary crypto projects out there, that only /biz/ autist and redditors baghold

[Anonymous No.8749161]

>>8749018
to take fees is not a reason to exist. they can take fees in ETH or even USD. Governance? lmao thats gold

[Anonymous No.8749186]

>>8749161
>they can take fees in USD
then what happens if somebody makes a Dapp on the request platform that becomes the most used app, and they charge ETH fees instead of REQ. The foundation makes nothing
Use your brain retard

[Anonymous No.8749188]

>>8749161
They do take fees in USD and ETH pajeet. DYOR ffs.

[Anonymous No.8749213]

>>8749188
so wtf is the token for then lol?

[Anonymous No.8749223]

>>8749213
The token is bought with the fees and burnt to drive the price up

[Anonymous No.8749235]

>>8749186
that makes no sense. The foundation can take a cut of the fees regardless of what its denominated in. Fuckin retard

[Anonymous No.8749253]

>>8749223
made up use case. thanks for proving my point. REQ was a fundraiser token nothing more. Does paypal have a token?

[Anonymous No.8749277]

>>8749253
no wonder this thing hasn't mooned most people are too dumb to understand what it even is. research some more brainlet

[Anonymous No.8749309]

>>8749277
no it hasnt mooned because non-retards realize that theres no reason for the token to exist. they needed fundraising to kickstart their project that needs no token whatsoever. why the fuck are tokens bought and then burned with fees? its just to keep u retarded bagholders happy

[Anonymous No.8749311]

>>8749277
How is he wrong though? The only use case of the Req token is to be burnt as fee.
They could just take ETH as fee, but they need to reward their investors for now.

[Anonymous No.8749336]

175K REQ - comfy as fuck.

[Anonymous No.8749341]

>>8748463
>REQ
>undervalued
That word doesn't mean what you think it means.

[Anonymous No.8749395]

>>8749336
holy shit thats nice.
thats my goal. 55k so far

[Anonymous No.8749400]

>>8749311
>>8749309
>>8749277
>>8749253
>>8749213
'While it is built on the blockchain ledger of Ethereum, Request aims to be independent from other currencies,
monetary policies, or technological choices so that we build the most robust system possible.'

[Anonymous No.8749415]

>>8749309
Hurr why is BNB bought and burned? Hurr what reason does BNB have to exist.
Oh wait I bet you don't have any BNB either. Stay poor nigger. The token is representation of network success, it price increases the more the network is used. Burning is built into the contract, it's not done by the developers. It automatically buys peoples bags itself and drives the price up with its profits. It's as if when you own REQ you metaphorically own the network, wide adoption leading to high priced REQ automatically. That's as far as I am going to spoonfeed you brainlets.

[Anonymous No.8749431]

>>8749400
>>8749311
>>8749253
>>8749213
Request will have to remain flexible and scalable, this being one of the major challenges of
decentralized systems (as we can see with Bitcoin16 Segwit, or the Ethereum management of Ice age ...). We
wish to separate the governance of our community from the one of Ethereum and avoid a sub-governance
that would allow every Ethereum token holders to decide on the future of this community

Request is agnostic in terms of currency. We are creating a system that should not be dependent on the
monetary policy of another currency. Request should be as independent as possible from ETH inflation or
deflation

[Anonymous No.8749432]

yes

[Anonymous No.8749434]

>>8749400
wow so convincing

[Anonymous No.8749441]

>>8749415
>metaphorically own the network

So what happens when people realize that they dont actually own any part of the network and that it's all metaphorical?

[Anonymous No.8749443]

>>8749434
>>8749431

[Anonymous No.8749458]

>>8749431
thats bullshit. theyll be taking a flat fee thats based on USD. Inflation of ETH wouldnt matter since they'd be paying the USD equivalent anyways

[Anonymous No.8749468]

90 req have been burned sofar, much progress.....

[Anonymous No.8749482]

My understanding of 'governance' is that if REQ wants to move/upgrade blockcahins it needs it's own tokens. REQ says it wants to be around for hundreds of years and this is only possible with it's own token. The token will rise in price because of token burn and because of expectation of token burn + confidence in the company. It combines speculation and working product hence why I see it as severely undervalued

[Anonymous No.8749494]

>>8749458
We
wish to separate the governance of our community from the one of Ethereum and avoid a sub-governance
that would allow every Ethereum token holders to decide on the future of this community

In the process of scaling the Request network, there is a strong probability that we will use a solution such
as the Plasma Chains. In these solutions, a specific token help to incentivize the avoidance of Byzantine18
states and maximize security. The token is used as a POS (Proof of Stake) and stakers are disincentivized
against Byzantine behaviors or faults as that would cause a loss in value of the token.
Using a token is the most flexible and independent way to conceptualize a system that will need consensus
and security to evolve in the long term

[Anonymous No.8749539]

>>8749494
do you really not question this at all? Theyre jumping through all kinds of hoops to try and convince you that theres a need for a token. How does the Request Network needs governing? Also need I remind you that governance aka voting rights is a feature of a security?

[Anonymous No.8749541]

>>8749441
It's like BNB, you metaphorically own Binance, in the sense that Binance's success and profits are linked to BNB. If Binance stays alive and profiting then BNB keeps going up. If Binance exit scams you are left with bags. But overall it should go up due to mass burning as long as it stays alive. Both go up at a faster rate depending on usage. More usage = more fees used to purchase the token.

Unlike Binance the project isn't finished yet but will be totally revolutionary in the crypto space. It has the PwC partnership, the best partnership in crypto. People are just too fucking stupid to see what is in front of them. I've been around since 2014 and I've never been so bullish on a coin.

[Anonymous No.8749560]

>>8748659
I bought on the way down at 65cents and at fucking 22 cents last week
My average overall entry is still at 12cents so the pain isnt too bad

[Anonymous No.8749653]

>>8749541
You didn't hold any eth by any chance did you? I've been researching and reading about crypto since 2014 also but only invested in November of last year. My only worry is that NO alts will see any traction until they become uncoupled from BTC.

[Anonymous No.8749724]

>>8749653
REQ fixes this problem. Although I suspect Binance might support fiat before REQ sees widespread adoption. REQ will definitely help though. Someone will set up a REQ buying network where you can just buy alts for fiat using Request Network. It's so easy even I could do it.

[Anonymous No.8749758]

>>8749724
I know people have been saying that but i've not quite seen it although it does seem plausible. I'm also into GVT for that exact reason.

[Anonymous No.8749903]

Ask yourself a question. What will REQ be worth in 5 years? $25 - $100 at least. 50K REQ will give you a return of 1.25 to 5 million. Thats the real moon shot - adoption! So invest $7,500 in your retirement and relax.

[Anonymous No.8749908]

>>8749903
>retirement fund
>crypto
Pick one.
Then kys.

[Anonymous No.8749947]

>>8749903
why is nobody seeing that?

[Anonymous No.8749956]

>>8749541
look man I get that BNB has appreciated nicely, but it's flawed as well. I'm not interested in metaphorical ownership. Youre making a decent argument for REQ as a security, but they sure as hell didn't register with the SEC. REQ token doesn't have real utility. Only reason anyone would want to own any is for speculative purposes. If I need to use the network and theyre making me use REQ to do so, I'll just buy some on the spot and use it immediately

[Anonymous No.8749971]

>>8749947
Because we're not all deluded like you.

[Anonymous No.8750012]

>>8749971
genuinely I just want to make money if you can help me see my delusion I'd be very appreciative but as far as I can see this is a pretty solid investment

[Anonymous No.8750025]

>>8748669
So what does it do then? And don't post the Pay With Request meme images, give me a real fucking use case that solves an actual problem that would be brought on by mass adoption. I'll save you time, because the answer is you can't. You missed the moon. nothin personnel kid.

[Anonymous No.8750026]

>>8748874

[Anonymous No.8750027]

>>8749956

[Anonymous No.8750036]

>>8749541
Also PWC is trying to push developpers and companies to use blockchain technologies. It's not
"okay, we are partners, let's see what we will do together"
translation : prize for creating a blockchain app to authentify meds against counterfeit.

[Anonymous No.8750084]

>>8750025
That is a use case nigger.

-Cheaper than paypal
-Allows people to receive in fiat from a payment in crypto and vice versa
-Decentralized meme

Can you take your currency shitcoin and actually spend it? REQ will allow you to actually buy shit in ANY crypto, properly, not some purse.io proxy shit. There are also more projects besides the payment one.

[Anonymous No.8750106]

>>8750084
>What is interledger protocol
Ripple labs already has this area covered.

[Anonymous No.8750110]

>>8750025
https://ethereumworldnews.com/6-use-cases-request-network-req/ I think explains it better than I could

[Anonymous No.8750122]

>>8749956
That's basically it for the token. The profit for the devs comes from speculation of the token. Because that's where the profit is, the network itself can have fees which are extraordinarily low compared to non block chain competitors, giving it a competitive edge.

[Anonymous No.8750212]

>>8750122
yes like I said earlier, I like the project but not the token (especially as an American). There's a reason it hasnt been listed on any US exchanges yet even thought their mainnet is live. REQ would have a really hard time passing the Howey Test

[Anonymous No.8750254]

>>8750106
The day Ripple labs takes over crypto payments, everyone has lost already.

[Anonymous No.8750353]

>>8748853
Req hodler here. Not even mad lol.

[Anonymous No.8750493]

>>8750212
I must have tried 3 times in this thread to tell you that success of the network = increased token price and you still don't get it.
>I like Binance and think it could go for years but I hate BNB! It's not needed for transaction fees so why buy it? It's just driven on speculation.
If you like the network accumulate the fucking token. Brainlets these days.

[Anonymous No.8750546]

>>8750493
>If you like the network accumulate the fucking token
thats not good enough dude. It's not like I own stock in the company and am entitled to a kickback of profits. No real utility = fundraiser shitcoin. No thanks

[Anonymous No.8750553]

>>8750546
literally stay poor then you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.8750558]

>>8750546
The token powers the network assclown, if you like the network and think it will be used, buy the fucking token.

[Anonymous No.8750603]

>>8750558
you dont get it man. they added an unnecessary layer to the network just as a means to raise funds. this is going to turn into a problem somehwere down the line. if the network couldn't exist without REQ, I'd fucking buy it...but thats not the case

[Anonymous No.8750634]

>>8750603
If REQ didn't exist then the ETH token holders would be decide the future of the request platform. Request needs to be independent from any currency, blockchain or community if it wants to last.

[Anonymous No.8750655]

>>8750603
Why would the devs just add an unnecessary layer that could potentially compromise the future of the network if they could just charge fees in ETH? They obviously believe it's necessary for the future of the platform.

[Anonymous No.8750660]

>>8749956
>Thinks you need to own req to use the network.
You might be the dumbest person here, respectfully sir.

[Anonymous No.8750673]

>>8750634
no they wouldnt, thats retarded. There is no future to decide for token holders. you have no stake in the project. If they want to make changes to the protocol theyll just do it. Theyre not gonna fucking consult you retards

[Anonymous No.8750690]

>>8750546
>Why own eth? You don't actually get any dividends and it's not really needed, people can use traditional funding methods to raise money. It's not like dapps will be built atop req or anything or the pay by req button will fuel demand. Heh. Stay poor

[Anonymous No.8750701]

>>8750673
Then answer this >>8750655

And how come you have managed to spot this fundamental flaw in the project, but Ycombinator have somehow missed it?

[Anonymous No.8750702]

>>8750655
>being this dumb
they added the layer so they could raise 30m with an ICO

[Anonymous No.8750730]

>>8750702
Wait so you mean to say it's the equivalent of a company going public?
'
Please use the sharing tools found via the email icon at the top of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email [e-mail] to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour..
https://www.ft.com/content/7bd1b20a-879b-11e5-90de-f44762bf9896

But shares give their holders no right of possession and no right of use. If shareholders go to the company premises, they will more likely than not be turned away.

They have no more right than other customers to the services of the business they “own”. The company’s actions are not their responsibility, and corporate assets cannot be used to satisfy their debts.

Shareholders do not have the right to manage the company in which they hold an interest, and even their right to appoint the people who do is largely theoretical. They are entitled only to such part of the income as the directors declare as dividends, and have no right to the proceeds of the sale of corporate assets — except in the event of the liquidation of the entire company, in which case they will get what is left; not much, as a rule.'

[Anonymous No.8750817]

>>8750084
You think a button is a use case?

The biggest problem with REQ is that it's only useful if many of the cryptos that exist today will be around in the future and guess what, 99% of them are shitcoins and won't be around. What happens to REQ when there's only a handful of cryptos that are even being used in the future? Merchants will just decide they don't need the middleman and will accept these cryptos directly.

[Anonymous No.8750835]

>>8750817
Yes, PwC partnered with request for the cryptocurrency payments use case. You are so smart. Do you know nothing about request?

[Anonymous No.8750851]

>>8750730
>Wait so you mean to say it's the equivalent of a company going public?

ding ding. yea it is basically the equivalent....except for one problem, theyre not fucking registered with the SEC.

[Anonymous No.8750899]

>>8749415
Binance coin exists to clean up dust. Very straightforward and useful.

[Anonymous No.8750907]

>>8750851
The general consensus from regulators is to be very cautious (regulation wise) as to not stifle innovation of new technology. They don't care about legit projects with real partnerships and products, they care about scam ICOs. That is the green light for you my friend.

[Anonymous No.8751056]

>>8750817
No they won't. It's way easier to implement Request than to try and set up a website to receive even 3 different currencies. Just imagine you had an online store yourself. Most websites today only accept Paypal or Credit Card. No website wants separate payment options for every crypto. They will just pick the all in one that takes less of a cut than Paypal.

[Anonymous No.8751098]

>>8750907
I appreciate this reply and think youre mostly right, but here's my problem with that still: REQ basically was a scam ico. The network could fully exist on its own with no token (nobody has given me a compelling argument against this). The team could simply ask for fees in ETH and then cash the ETH out instead of using it to buy REQ to then burn. That layer was only put in place in order to justify a $30m token sale. The governance aspect is a joke (there's nothing to govern)

[Anonymous No.8751150]

>>8751098
Because the team needs money you retard? Yeah, lets just revolutionize commerce by working for free and let Request transaction fees pump ETH instead. Fucking hell you are brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8751155]

REQ or OMG?

[Anonymous No.8751185]

>>8751150
you are a fucking retard. they can make money off their network using any currency for fees. That shit is arbitrary. What they needed money for was to build their network (hence REQ being a fundraiser token).

[Anonymous No.8751202]

>>8751185
You are actually fucking retarded. It's like trying to explain to a shrimp what a whale is, completely incapable of understanding.

[Anonymous No.8751224]

The fact that I can see the price remains low because of the serious brainlets in the thread that can’t understand why it’ll be valuable as long as the network gets used more and more brings me joy and confidence that for once, I made the right choice and got in early.

[Anonymous No.8751246]

Poorfag here, I only need another 1500 to be at 10k. This is my first and last chance at 'making it'

How much will it be worth in a year?

[Anonymous No.8751265]

so many here are obsessed with spreading FUD about regulators,SEC,use cases, and token utility while I'm just sitting here worried that my tokens will get randomly burned
baka

I sense s/GmMpci works for a rival imo

[Anonymous No.8751270]

>>8751202
no dude you literally proved my point. REQ is a pure fundraiser token. It has no other reason to exist. Believe it or not, there are true utility tokens that are essential to their respective networks. Most of these are rewards-based. If you exhibit behavior that is beneficial to the network, you get rewarded for it with said token. REQ has no such feature. It's a glorified chuck e cheese token

[Anonymous No.8751312]

>>8751098
You're being smart unlike most of the guys here and I've asked myself the same questions you have. Thing is, the tokensale allowed the team to hire new people, pay themselves for their work and gave massive incentive for outside developers to make dapps on the network through the fund. The project wouldn't be possible without some sort of funding. Non-profit foundation has so many advantages that angel investors were not an option.

Not to mention how many people own REQ tokens and so have incentive to spread the word and help request become adopted. That on its own is enough to justify the use of a token, and those other benefits I believe (such as governance, helping with being blockchain agnostic among other things) ARE real. Without the token this whole project would be so much more difficult.

[Anonymous No.8751361]

>>8748463
How does a 'useless' coin become 'undervalued'?

[Anonymous No.8751375]

>>8751246
A lot in a year, fiat support will be out by then. In a sense it's not really finished yet as current mainnet is more for show than use. I'm accumulating fiat for now and buying up in a few more months rather than purchasing it now. I heard they will advertise it after fiat support. It hasn't even begun until Q3 at least. It won't stay under $1 forever though so I still hold a bit just in case normies catch on. Looking at the brainlets in this thread, there's probably not much to worry about there, accumulate in the short term.

[Anonymous No.8751385]

>>8751246
1M eoy brother. im about to buy 10k as well, heres to being rich

[Anonymous No.8751402]

>>8751270
>>8751185
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw3jjW8awKs
go to 14:35. Multi billion VCs saying ICOs will be a legit form of fundraising and.
Jim Breyer: 'I do think ICOs, a couple years from now, will be an alternative financing vehicle'

[Anonymous No.8751435]

>>8751270
What I'm getting at is just because it's not TECHNICALLY necessary, it is fundamentally necessary

[Anonymous No.8751464]

>>8751312
>>8751270
You can't have dirt cheap transaction fees without some other profit method. Thats enough reason to go with this business model.

[Anonymous No.8751471]

When will most of you stupid req white knighters realize that fighting the FUD is what makes you stupid. The smart req owners are promoting the FUD (until at least 35% of req has been burned, Req can easily reach $100 in 1 year if 35% gets burned)


Keep the price low diptards!

[Anonymous No.8751497]

>>8751471
People who bought REQ because of it being fudded are utterly BTFO.

[Anonymous No.8751512]

>>8751497
You mean sold?

[Anonymous No.8751516]

>>8751312
>>8751402
>>8751435
this is a relatively convincing reply that I can appreciate. It's too much mental gymnastics to justify the token (for me at least anyway). I'm just going to stick with the coins that make technical sense to me for now. Good luck with REQ. I will respecfully exit this thread now lol

[Anonymous No.8751525]

>>8751464
You're right. Didn't need to type all that shit out, I am a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8751572]

>>8751471

If you spread enough fud people will choose OMG instead. Be careful.

[Anonymous No.8751587]

>>8748463

WTC is, not even joking

[Anonymous No.8751599]

>>8751471
There is no realistic way to keep burning high by fudding. As soon as it gets adopted it won't be underground anymore and the redditors will come in to FOMO it up to $10 like they bought shit like TRON. People will realize it is actually being used long before adoption is high enough to burn significant amounts under their noses. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous No.8751734]

>>8751471
This kind of argument always makes me fear that there are really teenage autistic whales out there that do not realize that fud sticks.
The average investor, the one that you want to fomo later and buy your bags, is not going to change his mind once is convinced that a project is not worth it, expecially with the amount of coins, token and info to process lately. He will simply buy something else.
The shill/fud cicle is potentially deadly, kids.

[Anonymous No.8751746]

Are we in the despair phase of the hype cycle? Because I want off this ride.

REQ was supposed to make me a millionaire by June.. Now it looks like we won't even have fiat-fiat capability in Q2.

[Anonymous No.8751767]

>>8751746

i would like this pajeeta to bear my seed

[Anonymous No.8751829]

>>8751734
this is why I'm mostly in OMG
it's impossible to FUD

[Anonymous No.8751849]

>>8751734
This. Well said

>>8751471
See what you're doing faggot?
>>8751829

[Anonymous No.8751884]

>>8750012
It's just fud man

[Anonymous No.8751997]

>>8751734
Except in REQ’s case they don’t need to be convinced to buy the token. All that matters is people see it as a good app to pay people with or crowdfund or audit, etc.

It’s completely unrequired for anyone to give a fuck about speculating on it. If the project gets used and is valuable, it will naturally go up due to the fees and market buying REQ for burning.

PwC is interested in it and sees the potential. You think a group of people on /biz/ are going to sway the minds of businesses that want to use it?

This is why brainlets don’t understand how as long as they release a good product, it’s a G U A R A N T E E D moon mission, unlike other tokens where the price depends on people actually going out of their way to buy it.

[Anonymous No.8752213]

>>8750817
>he doesn’t know about triple entry accounting.
>he doesn’t know about all the req use cases.
Stay poor faggot the req/pwc partnership was the biggest announcement in crypto so far this year.

[Anonymous No.8752245]

>>8751829

Except, you know, the part where it's over-valued by at least $9.50 and vaporware.