[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 6 KB, 177x183, 54356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8660255 No.8660255 [Reply] [Original]

EOY

>> No.8660260
File: 258 KB, 813x551, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8660260

0
0
0

>> No.8660353
File: 6 KB, 372x135, download (5).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8660353

>>8660255

>> No.8660375

>>8660255
Agreed. Except about Ripple. Fuck Ripple.

>> No.8660387

>>8660255
IOTA? GTFO TROLL!

>> No.8660406

>>8660255
Op let me ask you, if a government decided they wanted to shut down Iota or Ripple right now, what would happen?

>> No.8660426

https://shitcoin.com/iota-cannot-be-used-for-iot-loss-of-funds-may-occur-e45b1ed9dd6b?ho1

LOL

>> No.8661131

>>8660406
you compare ripple and iota? do your research retard

you cant shutdown iota

>> No.8661154

>>8660426

www.you-are-to-stupid-for-crypto-!-you-still-believe-in-youtubers-and-fud-news-!-you-will-loose-everything-retard.com

>> No.8661174

>>8660255
>Op let me ask you, if a government decided they wanted to shut down Iota or Ripple right now, what would happen?
IOTA vs. EOS which one?

EOS:
>turing complete
>zero-fees
>1000-100k tps
>0.5 sec finality

IOTA
>zero-fees
>can scale to however fast sigs can be verified by
a CPU (100k tps)
>finality dependent on traffic on network

>> No.8661219

>>8660406
Then ripplewoykd continue operating in other cojntries where it is not shut down .

.

>> No.8661274

IOTA bashing is all FUD.

>I have never had an issue using it.

Seamless, only a fucking brainlet would not be able to work out you attach then transact.

The FUD reminds me of all the FUD around ETH back in the day, unfounded and shitted on by the big players because it was clearly a threat.

>IOTA is a threat. That's a buy for me.

>> No.8661441
File: 6 KB, 560x132, beaner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8661441

>>8660255
Not quite