[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 45 KB, 570x487, 347346235235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8568445 No.8568445 [Reply] [Original]

>ChainShit is now at ¢34

>> No.8568511

Time to buy more

>> No.8568521

Why is it dropping guise

>> No.8568534

>>8568445
last dip it went to $0.27 and climbed back up to $0.42.
i dind't buy the dip, wont make the same mistake twice.

>> No.8568578

Hope it goes below ICO price. Hope all LINK shills an hero.

>> No.8568598

>>8568578
wow rude

>> No.8568605

>>8568578
Why? That’s mean spirited of you. Are you not happy with your own life anon?

>> No.8568608

>>8568578
What was the ICO price?

>> No.8568621

>>8568608
10c

>> No.8568652

>no info on tokenomics
>no info on the progress of the contracts (the most important part)
>no solid info on users ready to use the network
>no answer to how many people are working full time on the project
>no ETA on when the main net will go live, let alone the core adapters for chains other than ethereum
>ripped to shreds by a code reviewer with no answers from anyone but the community manager (not even the technical communtity manager) and some random guy (jonny) who has a financial interest in the network being successful and now seeing that the whole thing is in question is having a crowdsale to get some eth and bounce.

Why did anyone buy this? If you get some answers to those questions it may be a good buy but right now you'd be an idiot to hold this. And no this isn't "buying the news," it's getting fundamental answers to questions that should be the bare minimum due diligence for buying into a project like this.

>> No.8568690
File: 28 KB, 551x367, 1513952757866.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8568690

>>8568652
>can't answer

>> No.8568697
File: 104 KB, 1114x753, 1517892284147.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8568697

>>8568652
Maybe I should sell.

>> No.8568710
File: 410 KB, 900x900, 1520646060340.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8568710

>>8568652
>Why did anyone buy this?
I bought it because i like the memes.
Im all in.

>> No.8568719

>>8568652
I’d write a reply if you weren’t a braindead faggot not worth losing words on

>> No.8568728
File: 40 KB, 709x765, d19340d87a93f2d7d1fb7bb9d2293e08--school-tomorrow-reaction-pictures.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8568728

>I bought at $1.30

>> No.8568730

K KEEP ME FUCKIN POSTED LAD WOOOOOO

>> No.8568734

I just bought $100 of it.

$1000 EOY.

>> No.8568754

Linkies confirmed for getting stinky

>> No.8568755

>>8568445

That's my wall there at 4618. JUst wanna dump and tether up desu.

>> No.8568768

What was the ICO price btw?

>> No.8568773

>>8568728
You're never getting your money back bud. Hope you didn't fall for the memes

>> No.8568790

>>8568755
Tether is about to explode too

>> No.8568798

>buying gopnik coins

you deserve bankrupcy

>> No.8568806

>>8568719
These are all good questions though. You have to be in their slack to get any answers it seems. Its not FUD to say the team DGAF about keeping us updated, which is not encouraging. They didnt even have a sxsw stream ffs.

>> No.8568874

>>8568806
There are no answers to any of those questions because the devs are either scammers who got in too deep or jus as deluded as everyone who bought their shitcoin

>> No.8568931

>>8568874
that id is freaking me out. the memes are becoming sentient

>> No.8568945

>>8568806
>These are all good questions though
No they aren't.

>> No.8568995

TETHER UP BOYS YEEEEEEWWWWW!!!! hahaha just playing cunts

>> No.8569012
File: 2.30 MB, 4032x3024, IMG_0958.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8569012

>>8568931
I'm the embodiment of REQ that has aimed sentience and come to /biz/ to tell you that both REQ and LINK are worthless shitcoins designed to dazzle the half-brained with a good idea that you're too dumb to realize is technically impossible.

>> No.8569019

>>8568652
This is great, new FUD pasta, thank you for this

>> No.8569123

>>8568945
At least half of them are. Eta on mainnet. Size of the team and their exact employment status and what their duties are. There is STILL no official answer from the team to the medium fud. There is an answer from Johnny, who desu no offense to the guy but IDGAF what he thinks about anything, he gets details wrong and is not an official team member.

>> No.8569166

>>8569123
They owe you none of this information. Zero.

>> No.8569202

if it hits 30 stack of money here

>> No.8569208

>>8568773
I bought at 80 cents. Will I ever see that money again or no dice.

>> No.8569282

>>8569208
Not a chance

>> No.8569286

>>8569166
Mate fuck yourself, if someone funds your ico you owe them. End of. You dont get to go "oh thanks for the money shitheads now fuckoff"

>> No.8569317

>>8569286
>>8569166
it's not about what they owe anyone (which is nothing), it's about whether it's wise to buy these tokens with so many unanswered questions, to which the only real response is you trust them.

>> No.8569360

>>8569286
You could be an employee or even a major investor in a company, and chances are you wouldn't get this kind of info.

>>8569317
>it's about whether it's wise to buy these tokens with so many unanswered questions
In crypto, the more of these types of questions are answered, the bigger the chance that it's a scam.

>> No.8569407

>>8569208

Can you see for a reason for LINKs price to go x ~140% in the forseeable future in bleeding bear market like this? If not, then no. LINK is a good idea, but you will be waiting a long time to see it hit 80c again. It took 3 months for it to go from 20 cent to 45 cent.

>> No.8569414

>>8569360
Employees and major investors have strong legal protections and real companies have to keep public records and do audits

>> No.8569458

>>8569414
Audits on future development?

You're delusional.

>> No.8569506

>>8568578
Agreed. After emduring all the retarded spam, linkfags deserve to stay poor.

>> No.8569545

>>8568445
See you at 15 cents boyos

>> No.8569764

>>8569545
I hope so. I'd clear the order book out

The anons above do raise valid questions, but they have always operated this way. The ICO was open before the whitepaper was even published. People back then took it as a major red flag (understandably so), but so far I think the progress has been decent. Those original fears turned out to be unfounded. I remain confident in the project, keeping an eye on the news as it comes. I'm not emotionally invested enough not to jump ship if something fucked up comes out.