/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.8554174]

HAHAHA LINKIES BTFO, CODE IS COMPLETELY BULLSHIT HAHAHAHA

https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-chainlink-10b46f7b231

[Anonymous No.8554448]

lmaoo

[Anonymous No.8554526]

Kek

[Anonymous No.8554543]

Im just in it for the memes

[Anonymous No.8554565]

There's a couple of points he's made which shows he hasn't really had a deep look through the code or the whitepaper. When he says "This means they are currently coding for a limited set of cases, but, I’m sure they will still expand on it, so let’s move on." about the HTTP headers and only using basic auth, it's designed like that because of external adaptors. The file he screenshotted was from the utils package, not the package with all the adaptors in. I find it a weird omission if he really looked through it, because external adaptors open the node up to any data source in any format.

Same is said about the point after: "Their code is incredibly Ethereum intertwined, so it wasn’t designed with multiple blockchains in mind". It's designed in a way to be modular, for example the list of core adaptors:
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/master/adapters/adapter.go#L19

I like that he's picked up on being able to define crons, that's a good feature about CL. Just with him stating about the timezones, isn't true as it's in UTC.

He's right with the consesus and validation code, but that's what needs to be done next. I've said it a few times with us waiting on the main-net contracts and that's what they'll do.

Good to see a post which dives more into CL though, good read.

[Anonymous No.8554593]

There is no reason you can’t have a 100% ETH based decentralized solution, you can pay the decentralized nodes via ETH fee’s for their data transfer (a simple Ethereum based side-chain). So in it’s current iteration ChainLink as a token for me, doesn’t have a great value proposition. With just Ethereum support, I find it very annoying that you have to own ETH (to trigger the log event) and ChainLink (to pay for the data request) to receive a simple HTTP request.

THANKS JUST SOLD MY STACK

[Anonymous No.8554598]

He accumulating

[Anonymous No.8554620]

his Tau review is also spot on:
>https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-lamden-tau-c973669c2219

>Conclusion: These are very inactive code bases and it’s very blockchain 101 type of code. The implementations currently provided as well are just wrappers on existing technology so it isn’t offering anything new to the user.

[Anonymous No.8554644]

>>8554174
The funniest thing about Chainlink is that most of the holders haven't even read the whitepaper, and everyone knows this, so it's super easy for whales to just say
>this white paper is incredible! you're missing out if you don't buy this
>DYOR tee-hee
Yeah, well I did read the whole thing, and if you actually put the time in to read the damn thing, you'll realize that the what they're trying to do is impossible, and they know it.
Basically it boils down to this two man team came up with a philosophical question, attempted to answer it with a fancy white paper, and are selling it to the unwashed masses to make a profit.
>two people
>1 philosophy major
Get the point?

[Anonymous No.8554650]

WERE SAVED

>@Theroryshow (Rory) from ChainLink reached out and asked that I do a third party review for ChainLink. I never like it when a member of the team actually reaches out, since it almost always guarantees the code is good.

[Anonymous No.8554660]

>>8554593
Next sentence:
"As they expand to more blockchains and become more agnostic this vision however changes..."

[Anonymous No.8554669]

>>8554644
look up the github you retard
>le 2 men team meme
that was a good fud in november, not now

[Anonymous No.8554685]

>>8554620
They're 3 months in for fucks sake
Also, lamden isn't here to revolutionize, it's here to sell

[Anonymous No.8554692]

He basically says that there are a lot of things missing from the code. Not exactly groundbreaking. Chainlink was onky crested in late 17

[Anonymous No.8554693]

>>8554650
Read the rest.
He's saying it has taken SC half a year to code the basic features, which are not even technically challenging.

In other words, no singularity in 2018

[Anonymous No.8554710]

>>8554693
More time to accumulate then....LINK is a minimum 2 year hold anyways.

[Anonymous No.8554714]

>>8554693
>expecting anything to moon in 2018

[Anonymous No.8554719]

>>8554174
The cost of node execution for data adaptation and storage/retrieval will be similar to AWS lambda, on paper it looks like a lot, but in practice is exponentially cheaper than running a cluster of full time servers due to billing in the milisecond range. So complaints regarding people afraid to overuse it are invalid IMPO.

The codebase has only really been in active development for less than 3 months and in that time they have put together a working POC, pretty impressive if you ask me.

The currency and contract formation complaints are valid, but that was secondary to the initial POC to see if this could work. If you think this will not be implemented with the token used to raise funds for the company you are dellusional, that would be like Sia all of a suddenly announcing it is switching to bitcoin cash,

I honestly hope this keeps getting the shit on it treatment from major outlets, the product has very little hype outside of the constant memeing on biz.

If you have ever tried to setup infra to interact with the eth blockchain you will understand the value of this system.

The people shitting on Chainlink now are the same people that were shitting on Docker when it was starting to get adoption, arguing that containers are available for all Linux OSs and Docker does not do anything special.

It makes using the blockchain to store and retrieve data easy and almost idiot proof, this shit is gonna explode in adoption.

[Anonymous No.8554723]

STINKY LINKIES IN SUICIDE WATCH
check'em

[Anonymous No.8554781]

>>8554174
Rory answered this FUD
Pick related

[Anonymous No.8554786]

>>8554660
This. The fact alone that they rewrote all of their code to golang is proof that they only see ethereum as a temporary step.

[Anonymous No.8554793]

holy shit
i feel bad for that dude who borrowed 20k off his parents for this
you know someone's going to build something better by the time this one-man burger show finally toddles down that "long road" ahead of him
ahahahahaahahahaha
oh fuck, you stinky morons
you got led around by the nose by those ico buyers, you bought their moon, and now you're gonna eat their shit
fuck, you neets are so vulnerable and they really know it

[Anonymous No.8554797]

LITERALLY WATCH DELUSIONAL LINKIES TRYING TO SPIN THIS AS POSITIVE NEWS

[Anonymous No.8554800]

AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

I knew it. Glad I didn't invest in this. This shit is impossible to do. Nice idea bro

[Anonymous No.8554801]

>>8554781
This is big

[Anonymous No.8554814]

LINK FAGS CAN SUCK A DICK.

ALL OF YU FAGGOTS ARE GONNA BE BTFO'd.

CANT FUCKING WAIT TO SEE ALL THE SUICIDE THREADS>

[Anonymous No.8554819]

>>8554793
>>8554786
>>8554797
>>8554800
Check this retards>>8554781

[Anonymous No.8554835]

>>8554819

How are you gonna kms?? LIke a little bitch on 4chan, or like a man with a gun?

[Anonymous No.8554837]

the best part is, all this constant shilling driving buyers away was actually keeping us safe, so we have the shills to thank for not buying this garbage. they were warning us to what they already knew, deep down inside
garbage link

[Anonymous No.8554845]

>>8554819
are you doing some kind of next level fud? the screenshot talks about swift

[Anonymous No.8554853]

>>8554793

[Anonymous No.8554854]

>>8554819
ahahahahaha
oh no no no no no no no
no spin
garbage link

[Anonymous No.8554861]

>>8554835
Can you read? Rory said that poc is not related to what CL are doing with swift

[Anonymous No.8554866]

>>8554781
wait. this confirms that the swift rapport was chainlink

[Anonymous No.8554868]

>>8554853
it's beautiful

[Anonymous No.8554869]

So much new fud today. Nice try bogs

[Anonymous No.8554881]

Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

I give in. I'm finally jumping on the LINK train. I know I will actually kill myself if LINK

[Anonymous No.8554884]

>>8554861
>the reading comprehension level of a typical stinky
read the OP

[Anonymous No.8554890]

>>8554781
That doesn't even refer to the same article you fucking mong, can you read?

[Anonymous No.8554894]

>>8554866
No retard that fud is related to nostro, thats not what CL is doing with swift

[Anonymous No.8554901]

>>8554869
>forced to face reality
>"no, i refuse! it's teh bogs!"
>lalalalal
$1000 EOY cutie pie

[Anonymous No.8554907]

>>8554174
Just bough 5k more LINK.

[Anonymous No.8554910]

>>8554174
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LINKIES SURRENDER

[Anonymous No.8554911]

>>8554861
Yeah, Swift closes down their blockchain implementation.
>Has nuttin to do Link
Weeew lad !

[Anonymous No.8554912]

>>8554861

YOU"VE BEEN DUPED, ANON.

NO AMOUNT OF KOOLAID WILL MAKE IT BETTER.

SCREENSHOt THIS

[Anonymous No.8554918]

>>8554890
Exactly you mongoloid rory points too the actual report that is related to CL, the one posted by OP talks about nostro

[Anonymous No.8554932]

>>8554918
Are you retarded? The post in OP is a code review of ChainLink.

Linkies are really this stupid, huh?

[Anonymous No.8554942]

>>8554918
please be fudding by being intentionally retarded

[Anonymous No.8554964]

>So right off the bad, what I don’t like, is there aren’t any headers being specified there, only the URL and then the basic auth parameters. This means they are currently coding for a limited set of cases, but, I’m sure they will still expand on it, so let’s move on.

[Anonymous No.8554969]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.8554991]

>>8554969

It's sharpie in the ass time.

I'll buy all your linkies off of you before the big crash if I see sharpies. Double goes for double sharpies, triple for triple, etc.

[Anonymous No.8554995]

>>8554174
>Conclusion: It’s very nice code, but it shows a lack of production experience, they are very far from achieving their whitepaper goals, for now they are a standalone application that can listen to Ethereum only events and do very basic HTTP requests. They have an incredibly long road still ahead of them to finish their concept.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.8554999]

Been out from biz for a month.
Are we finally getting some legit FUD?
I'm feeling nervous...

[Anonymous No.8555014]

>>8554174
So fucking glad i sold i few days ago. RIP link, atleast for 1 year

[Anonymous No.8555083]

>>8554174
>https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-chainlink-10b46f7b231
>Their cron implementation isn’t time agnostic, what this means is it doesn’t take nodes in multiple timezones into considerations, some nodes will fire at different times or hours because of localized timezone adjustment, this tells me they don’t have too much production experience in this field.


HAHAHAH WHAT THE FUCK WOW

[Anonymous No.8555123]

>>8554781
what a scammer

[Anonymous No.8555134]

LINK IS JUST A MEME

DONT ACTUALLY FUCKING BUY IT

[Anonymous No.8555135]

>>8554174
WHY ISN'T THE PRICE DUMPING AAAAAAAAAAAA SELL YOU IDIOTS IT'S OVER GET IT THROUGH YOUR FUCKING HEADS

[Anonymous No.8555149]

Holy fuck. Placing this on cointelegraph soon.

[Anonymous No.8555153]

>>8554853
linkies are really this dumb?

[Anonymous No.8555157]

>>8555083
>create decentralized global solution
>it only works in one time zone
Lmao

[Anonymous No.8555161]

MOMMY CAN I BORROW MORE MONEY FOR SOME MAGIC BEANS THAT I REALLY BELIEVE IN BECAUSE OF THIS MONGOLIAN COFFEE BEAN BOARD
TAKE IT OUT OF MY ALLOWANCE UNTIL IM 30 REEEEEE

[Anonymous No.8555167]

>>8555083
or maybe this guy just sucks at reviewing code

[Anonymous No.8555194]

>>8554174
What are you talking about? its a very good json parser.

[Anonymous No.8555205]

Link volume increasing. This project is no longer just being bought by biztards. People with real money are taking notice.

[Anonymous No.8555213]

Don't care I'm deluded

[Anonymous No.8555218]

>>8555205
These are deluded holders from 2017 finally selling

[Anonymous No.8555223]

>>8554881
Great recap

[Anonymous No.8555250]

>>8554853
Link fags on suicide watch

[Anonymous No.8555261]

[Anonymous No.8555266]

>>8555157
What are timezones?

[Anonymous No.8555269]

>the code isn't finished yet!!!
No shit, lol. That's because it's under development.
Some serious accumulation and/or actual retardation going on.

[Anonymous No.8555272]

>>8554999
Yeah first legit fud in a while...
I might pull out now
T. 10k link owner

[Anonymous No.8555273]

Im going to see this article 100 times next week right?
Weak fud though

[Anonymous No.8555302]

>>8555218
This
Get out now while u can

[Anonymous No.8555312]

>>8555167
Find a flaw with the analysis. You can't because he knows more about code review than you and you are just a deluded untechnical bagholder investor

[Anonymous No.8555317]

>>8555312
Mentioned Oraclize without typing lol. Opinion discarded

[Anonymous No.8555324]

>>8555302
FINALLY, get out please, more for us, our turn

[Anonymous No.8555328]

>>8555317
That isn't an argument.

[Anonymous No.8555329]

>>8555312
bought at 15 cents and already sold half for a big profit. stay jelly. if the code was really shit, it would have dumped more by now with all these FUDing articles coming out.

[Anonymous No.8555335]

Jesus christ i almost feel bad for stinky linkies at this point
They get btfo over and over yet still cant give up their delusions

[Anonymous No.8555356]

>>8555329
That isn't a technical argument. Literally every point you made was >muh price.

Congratulations on proving my point that you are a non-technical bagholder.

[Anonymous No.8555376]

>>8554174
>https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-chainlink-10b46f7b231
Their code is incredibly Ethereum intertwined, so it wasn’t designed with multiple blockchains in mind, right now they are building Ethereum oracles, this concerns me a little bit from an architecture perspective, since it means they are rushing for their primary use case, ideally they should have tried abstracting as much as possible from the blockchain and instead following an ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) design approach, this will hurt their development in the future.

is this guy an idiot? chainlink will be developed as a blockchain agnostic solution. therefore this retard doesnt understand LINK

[Anonymous No.8555378]

Lets be honest here Link marines, there is no way to spin this positively

[Anonymous No.8555379]

>>8554835
>How are you gonna kill myself??

good question

[Anonymous No.8555433]

>>8555376
Jonny of Linkpool already refuted it.
>Same is said about the point after: "Their code is incredibly Ethereum intertwined, so it wasn’t designed with multiple blockchains in mind". It's designed in a way to be modular, for example the list of core adaptors:

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/master/adapters/adapter.go#L19

[Anonymous No.8555479]

>>8554719
im trembling>>8554719

[Anonymous No.8555504]

>>8554174
what the fuck
literally market sold all my LINK right now
I'm so crushed. I really thought I would make it.

[Anonymous No.8555546]

>>8555504
>he sold?
>pump it in 10 minutes, take down binance again through our backdoor if he tries to buy back in

[Anonymous No.8555550]

HAHhhahhaahhahhahaahhahaHahhahahahahahahahHaahhahahahahah

[Anonymous No.8555553]

>>8555328
>thinking I was arguing and not calling me a deluded linkie
Your not good at this with that level of bait I gave you hun

[Anonymous No.8555560]

also >>8555555

[Anonymous No.8555564]

>>8554174
Just sold my remaining bags. Thanks for reminding me to get out of this shit token OP.

[Anonymous No.8555592]

Literally anyone with programming experience knows that ChainLink is a hammer with no nails.

>decentralized consensus

lmao we can't even get consensus over bitcoin how can you expect decentralized oracles to even work

[Anonymous No.8555605]

nice. just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.8555607]

>>8555312
>Find a flaw with the analysis.
literally the 4th post in the thread explains why it's wrong but everybody ignored it

[Anonymous No.8555626]

>>8554174
>ChainLink has a solution for problem 1 whereby they aggregate, I’m not a huge fan of it, the problem is, if I want exact millisecond sensitive data, I don’t want a median average returned to me, so for time sensitive data I don’t think this is an ideal solution, for less volatile data, this however is a good solution to get off-chain data, perhaps user details or weather details.

nICE SENTENCE

[Anonymous No.8555704]

R u guyz trying to make me sell my linkies?

[Anonymous No.8555718]

>>8554593
>There is no reason you can’t have a 100% ETH based decentralized solution
Good luck with scalability.

[Anonymous No.8555772]

so it was a meme all along

[Anonymous No.8555782]

>>8554174
I can’t wait for the “it was a sure thing” or “you just got lucky” etc posts. I’ll be sure to forward people to this thread when everyone who doesn’t have hands of glass makes it.

Hello from 2018 guys, can’t wait to make it into one of those retro crypto FUD screencap threads in the future!

[Anonymous No.8555845]

So good I have hidden my LINK at my ledger
No way I am selling the bottom.

This FUD looks extremely legit, but I am tired of these jewish ticks. I just gonna hold the shit out of this token

[Anonymous No.8555865]

Just sold all my Link. Only lost 5k, not bad.

[Anonymous No.8555868]

Silly link posters

[Anonymous No.8555883]

I hate to say this but damn we link Marines just got btfo

[Anonymous No.8555898]

>>8555782
take this for future reference too anon
never forget the onslaught of ridicule we fought to receive our prize

[Anonymous No.8555924]

>>8554565
I like how you histrionic faggots are completely ignoring this post.

[Anonymous No.8555954]

>>8554174
>There is no reason you can’t have a 100% ETH based decentralized solution, you can pay the decentralized nodes via ETH fee’s for their data transfer
So in other words "hurrdurr just pay nodes in ETH".

A moment of silence for the poor saps that sell because of this drivel.

[Anonymous No.8555955]

>>8555898
How long till I laugh !!??
I cry now everitime !!

[Anonymous No.8555986]

>>8555924
let them sell

[Anonymous No.8556065]

>>8555273

Only 100? Not a chance.

[Anonymous No.8556085]

>>8555083
No faggot. LINK uses UTC. The reviewer didn't know that because he likes donkey dick.

[Anonymous No.8556324]

>>8555083
ChainLink uses UTC. Although I know nobody in this thread is actually paying any attention to each other.

[Anonymous No.8556363]

>>8555560
>sextuple against frogposting

what did Kek mean by this?

[Anonymous No.8556555]

>>8556085
How could he miss this? This seems pretty basic. Why would he assume the chainlink team had overlooked something so necessary?

[Anonymous No.8556688]

>>8555379
chains
INTERLINKED
around my neck
INTERLINKED

[Anonymous No.8556887]

Why can't we all just come to a consensus?

a) Why do people care if I invested in Link?

b) Why do people care if I sell or buy Link?

[Anonymous No.8556919]

>>8556555
Because this "reviewer" lacks even a basic programming understanding. Times in programming languages rarely respect timezones and in most cases are in Unix Epoch timestamps.

More lazy fud.

[Anonymous No.8556961]

Best box in the business.

[Anonymous No.8557028]

so I actually bothered to read OP's fud and here is my take
>lack of time agnosticism
wrong
>eth can be used for payments, link tokens not neccessary
wrong, it will be changed to link only
>no consensus mechanism yet
that's right, but you don't know how long will that take and how much is actually done outside of the public repo

overall pretty bullish if you ask me

[Anonymous No.8557065]

>that's right, but you don't know how long will that take and how much is actually done outside of the public repo
any thoughts on why exactly rory would ask them to review this before any of this is actually done? He's a pretty tough reviewer on everything though overall.

[Anonymous No.8557327]

>>8557065

It seems fine to me. Extra eyes on something might catch a problem. The only downside is a “bad review” out there, but the cl team doesn’t seem to give a fuck about marketing/perception whatsoever

[Anonymous No.8557454]

>>8554793
Not sure if you're referencing a post of mine, but i literally borrowed 20k off my parents for this.

Thing is, i work with my folks investing for a living. That 20k is less than 1% of our investable assets. I will watch this go to zero and simply be disappointed it didn't go as i wanted.

But i think it's going well beyond 1000 once the network's been running smoothly for a few years

[Anonymous No.8557670]

>>8556688
wassawassawassa

[Anonymous No.8558616]

>>8557454

>our investable assets.

Lol. dude. at least your honest saying it's your parents money.

[Anonymous No.8558623]

>>8557454
good to hear your parents are rich enough to cover for your bad decisions. alas, there's a lot of legitimately poor-ass chainlink investors that are gonna be burned hard, not just 'disappointed'

[Anonymous No.8558915]

Everythinglink aims for couldbesolved if the data source urls would sign their data. That would surely happen if smart contracts take of like linkers predict.

[Anonymous No.8558966]

>>8555335
Only thing left are their memes

[Anonymous No.8559057]

>>8554174
lol. I posted essentially the same thing yesterday, saying that LINK was just 20 go files and less than 10000 lines of code and somebody called me a nigger for it.
that being said, my point was that people who believe in the project should wake up and start contributing.

>>8558915
>>8558623
There's no reason for LINK to undergo any drastic downfall unless the market as a whole completely tanks. Even then, you're still better off hodling LINK than most other alts if you didn't tether because it's one of the few projects with an active github, an actual product and devs working on it. If you look through the other articles by the writer of OP's post, you'll see that there are coins with > 100m mcap that only forked the ethereum code and renamed all instances of "ethereum" to "insert_shitcoin_name".

[Anonymous No.8559174]

>>8559057
>If you look through the other articles by the writer of OP's post, you'll see that there are coins with > 100m mcap that only forked the ethereum code and renamed all instances of "ethereum" to "insert_shitcoin_name".

This. Almost all tokens are exactly that. Unfortunately LINK might be dragged down into the flames once the token space completely shits itself. Out of all the tokens I've seen only LINK and BAT are actually products that stand on their own two feet.

According to coinmarket cap there's over 1500 coins and tokens. In 5 years there will probably only be ~50

[Anonymous No.8559448]

BTFO
Sold my stack. Cunts.

[Anonymous No.8559504]

>>8559174
RLC is also a great project.

[Anonymous No.8559541]

My iron hands will never lose grip. Buy the dip. I’ll send a postcard from the top

[Anonymous No.8559562]

Thanks I was always wondering if biz really knew something I didn't. Glad I didn't fomo into it.

[Anonymous No.8559574]

What else did you expect from russian programmers? They've always produced sloppy shit tier code. Anyone who's worked with them knows this.

[Anonymous No.8559635]

>>8559057
Nigger

[Anonymous No.8559637]

>>8559174
naw man old coins may die but every coin died there will be 10x new one coming out.

crypto is so accessible now even a guy working in internet cafe can shit out his own coin.

[Anonymous No.8559667]

>>8554174

They are doing MVP right now. More will be added.

[Anonymous No.8559671]

>>8554174
oh man this is bad for LINKies

[Anonymous No.8559702]

Holding 5K LINK, I'll be back in 2 years. I get commenting FUD once a post is already made shilling the product, but only someone with a hidden agenda actively posts FUD. If they didn't like LINK or the project, they would simply ignore it.

[Anonymous No.8559703]

>>8559667
What’s mvp? Marginally viable plasma? What’s that got to do with link

[Anonymous No.8559748]

>>8557454
Jesus fuck nigger. Not all of us can drop 20k of our parents money on a dime. I am stuck wagecucking and I put every single dollar of my pittance into Link that I can afford to without literally starving.

Every day it's "yes mr Noseberg." No mr Noseberg." Sorry mr Noseberg, I will get it right next time, thank you for this opportunity, mr Noseberg."

And I have almost 20k Link. I am gonna hold that shit until I'm fuck you rich. This is my ticket to the top. I am gonna roll with the big shots soon. Lambos, bitches, hot tubs, big cars, body guards. But fuck me 20 fucking k of mommy's money. I wish nigga

[Anonymous No.8560372]

>>8554593
There is no reason to have a ether based ethereum smart contract network when you can just use bitcoin as payment to miners.

[Anonymous No.8560924]

>>8559703
Minimum viable product you fucking brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8561197]

>>8554644
> what the whitepaper says is impossible
Have a comp sci degree do you? I'm going to guess no. You're obviously a pajeet, so the only thing you're ever going to be qualified for is mumbling curry ebonics over the phone to try and scam people out of their money. Link is an amazing application of blockchain tech. If you actually understood the whitepaper which lays out the calculations which have been run through proof of concept in several scenarios with real world companies in the past few months, you wouldn't be saying the retarded shit you're saying right now.

Fucking nigger.

[Anonymous No.8561216]

>>8559574
Russian programmers are shit. Just like JNT programmers

[Anonymous No.8561251]

>>8555626
Median average? The centermost average of the averages returned by individual oracles?

Or is he just crazy?

[Anonymous No.8561363]

Why when anyone brings up problems with claims made in the article none of the people shitting on Link replies to these to argue that Link is a shitcoin instead they post "hahah Link BTFO". Makes me wonder whether this is just all FUD.

[Anonymous No.8561389]

>>8554565
Epic post between all the other autistic posts. Thank you

[Anonymous No.8561459]

Reminds me of when LINK just came out of the ICO and people FUDDED the absolute fuck out of it to bring the price down to under ICO price then all those same anons made threads about it gloating.

Anyone smart enough realizes it's the same shit repeated again and again with 0 substance.

Hold now. Cya in 2 years. Do not worry. Sometimes things in life just add up and make sense. You're given a golden ticket. Don't mess it up.

>t.250k linkies

[Anonymous No.8561466]

>>8561363
HAHA DELUSIONAL BAGHOLDER

[Anonymous No.8561476]

anyone with half a brain that actually took the time to understand links code would have realized it was shitty and void of anything substantial.

[Anonymous No.8561485]

link 1000$ eoy

[Anonymous No.8561518]

>code illiterate
>never really read links whitepaper
>never even been to links site
>what it does is pretty much what i thought it does
>its confirmed a dead project with no code as i expected
/biz/ is really spot on when it comes to actual info about shitcoins, anyone saying otherwise is just a fucking faggot, thank you /biz/ for keeping me away from this trash

[Anonymous No.8561555]

>>8561518
lmao there's no helping it look at people here just pasting arguments from their dev team or that volunteer from shittyass linkpool because they don't understand shit. unknowingly buying into their arguments even though it's pretty much bullshit because of the reasons you just said. holy fuck biz is actually code illiterate and it wants to invest in crypto where in the long run only those with decent tech will survive, fucking LOL AT YOU STUPID FUCKS.

[Anonymous No.8561566]

This code FUD is the best yet. I don't know how to feel. The guy is basically saying it looks nice but they don't have much done atm.

I'm not sure I'm psychologically prepared to watch LINK do nothing for another year or even longer. I've been a holder since ICO, but up until recently I thought LINK would at the very least experience steady growth. Now it's starting to sink in that I could very well be a bag holder for a while. It's already been over 6 months. For the first time since buying Link I think I am slipping back into depression. My hope is fading, but I won't ever let go of the dream.

[Anonymous No.8561581]

>>8554907
>checkered undies
kek

[Anonymous No.8561586]

>>8554174
LMAOOO LINKINES BTFO
GET READY TO HOLD THIS THING FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE HAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.8561609]

>>8561586
oh I will be, but it'll be to make enough passive income off my nodes to stay /comfy/ :^)

[Anonymous No.8561620]

So much FUD it's crazy. It seems all coordinated.

[Anonymous No.8561622]

>>8561555
kek

all you're doing is confirming a guy is right who just said it was wrong with no evidence.

it's clear this reviewer spent about 30 seconds looking through the code and thought he knew everything because he seems like an arrogant tool who thinks he's superior because he knows how to get something to print "hello world"

the guy is so wrong it's funny, clearly didn't look at shit.

[Anonymous No.8561631]

thanks just market sold all my LINK

[Anonymous No.8561636]

>>8561566
Do us all a favor and sell immediately, limp-wristed redditor.

You can stop being a depressed bitch, and we can be rich. Problems solved.

[Bearfag No.8561717]

>>8561620
>coordinated FUD
It's always that right? except when it isn't
Linker here, swing trade those shit coins like they are nothing because i know the chances of it being implemented are close to none

It does look good on paper, i'll give linkies that

Someone tell me who this bitch ass faggot ASSblaster is. PROOF that he is a crypto god, why do people trust him so much. Looks to me is he did an excellent shill to get his shitcoin pumped OR he is really delusional and believes his bull shit predictions.
I'm pretty sure he's the one that shilled DBC.
>100x
Half of all of biz got rekt in that (not me of course)

[Anonymous No.8561776]

>>8561717
Newfag kys

[Anonymous No.8562031]

>>8554565
Good post mate

[Anonymous No.8562166]

>LINKIES BTFO, CODE IS COMPLETELY BULLSHIT HAHAHAHA

Why would you say this, he says code looks nice but they still have a lot to do

[Anonymous No.8562252]

>>8562166
this so much from what I can tell and reading jonnys response.

-he calls the time zone thing unprofessional but that's not true
-he didn't understand the modular architecture and that he was looking at the ethereum core adapter
-he dings them on only just starting, which I guess is fair but there's no way of knowing how far along they are with this in private repositories.
-same old tired token value proposition argument that isn't worth talking about

honestly reading his other reviews this guy is harsh af, chainlink came out okay.

[Anonymous No.8562919]

>>8554565
Reached peace of mind reading your post, thx