The lie about OMG - because plp. lost there ability to read

[Anonymous No.7931332]

if this is false, feel free to provide the Information to clear it.

1*) Plasma is Developed for ETH and get implemented into ETH

OMG operates on the ETH
blockchain as ERC20 token
thats way Plasma effects it, also every other ETH base ICO ( ERC20 token like - I dont giv a fuck - FUCK token ) Why going with cripling ERC20 token instead of the mother ETH itself

2*) OMG is a ERC20 token
3*) OMG operates on the ETH blockchain
4*) Omise didnt have a github repo about ther promised blockchain project.
1*) Plasma scaling solution for ETH
https://www.google.at/amp/s/cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-bitcoins-lightning-network-author-reveal-ethereum-scaling-plans-analysis/amp

>Joseph Poon, the author of the Lightning Network, a micropayments solution for Bitcoin, and Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, have introduced Plasma, a scaling framework for Ethereum which has the potential to drastically optimize smart contracts and streamline the process of settling financial activities on the Ethereum Blockchain.
2*) OMG ERC20 token:
https://etherscan.io/token/OmiseGo

3*) OMG operates on the ETH blockchain: https://omisego.network
> unbank the bank with ethereum

Just read there fuckin headline, I shit in my pants. who the fuck needs a second layer if you can go with ETH.


4*) no github repo;
https://github.com/omise/omise-go

>yes omise has some repos,(API) but non of them is about there blockchain project.

As you can read at the warning, they link to there network site where you can read: unbank the bank with ethereum.


So wtf is Omise, and who the fuck cares about it. The project is live since one year and what did they have done within this timeframe?

[Anonymous No.7931462]

>>7931332

[Anonymous No.7931494]

>>7931332
>The project is live since one year and what did they have done within this timeframe?
Absolutely nothing. Thanks for this write up, I'm strongly considering selling at this point. I should have never bought in at 20$

[Anonymous No.7931984]

>>7931332
zzzz.. Boring Fud. Screencapped to laugh at later imagining your pinkness.

[Anonymous No.7932027]

>>7931332

Writing was on the wall when they failed to deliver on their promises a few months back. Sold my bags earlier this year and haven't looked back. There are more promising payment projects.

[Anonymous No.7932036]

>>7931332

you mad that you didn't accumulate lil weak hands?

[Anonymous No.7932057]

this is like a ethereum use friendly inside ETH itself but whatever

[Anonymous No.7932130]

Im having a hard time understanding what your saying, can you draw it as picture book

[Anonymous No.7932337]

>>7931332

And Bitcoin BCH will have 7 million transfers per second:

https://news.bitcoin.com/7-million-transactions-a-second-research-paper-declares-1tb-blocks-feasible/

[Anonymous No.7932362]

>>7932337

without the need of any "plasma" or other bullshit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbD0kiTddEs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g

[Anonymous No.7932526]

Or old both? No shit ETH is going parabolic this year. Which means top ETH tokens will probably as well.

[Anonymous No.7932790]

>>7931332
As if consumerism was in need of this

[Anonymous No.7933077]

>>7931494

This. It was shilled heavily and I bought at $12, but now that I've made a small profit and opened my eyes to the serious shortcomings, it's a safe bet to sell.

[Anonymous No.7933087]

>>7932362

who the fuck needs BCH, we want fancy new tec not a old crypling Bitcoin version with 10minute block times ...
its like comparing a nokia 3310(BCH) with the first iphone(ETH, NANO)

[Anonymous No.7933152]

>>7932362
I agree that BCH is better than BTC.
But then again. We already have better technology than blockchain. NANO.

Next step is building smart contract solution on NANO technology.