[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 11 KB, 280x180, comfy_link_pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7930430 No.7930430 [Reply] [Original]

*NEW TOP 100 WALLETs*

>547,368 LINK
>new as of 3 days ago
>0x9a5054b356451ffc717ba83c01b849c4d8ed7d29

>487,500 LINK
>new as of 4 days ago
>0xdbbd979f6b0c7af4b59e5b10ac048d4a66822f60

Here's where it gets really interesting.

Both of these new wallets received their funds from wallet #142. In fact, on the same day that they received their LINK, this wallet actually sent large amounts of LINK (96k-550k) to 6 wallets. 4 of them were new. Sure, it could be a whale splitting his funds between wallets because of paranoia.

But get this. Wallet #142 doesn't buy from Binance. He receives his funds directly from wallet #8. That's one of the original Chainlink team wallets (correct me if I'm wrong).

That means these transactions must be deals between ChainLINK and big node operators.

Am I just getting carried away with myself, or does this make sense?

>> No.7930459

Yes. Its sergey and his big super dick about to unload his bags on all virgin buttholes

>> No.7930472

>>7930430

I just removed my trips because you just found the grail. Track and label and you will see

>> No.7930479

>>7930430
Sounds legit

>> No.7930490

>>7930459
This

>> No.7930501

>>7930430
Nice research. It's interesting to see what these big whales hold.

What's with some of the top whales owning a different shadow ChainLink though?

>> No.7930506

Is LINK gona be the coin to save my blockfolio over the coming months? Iv had 75k for a couple months now

>> No.7930520

On the topic of top 100 wallets, I thought you might also be interested in the latest whale accumulation. These 5 wallets have accumulated 889k LINK between them over the last 7 days.

Pastebin because etherscan links get flagged as spam

https://pastebin.com/6UzWhYY8

>> No.7930526
File: 51 KB, 1000x1000, 1518924704104.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7930526

Stinky linkies, when will you learn?

>> No.7930538

>>7930506
anon, that 75k will be worth a couple million end of year

>> No.7930545

>>7930472
Are you the larper everyone likes or the one we're sick of now?

>> No.7930561

>>7930430
Or they're just adding a degree of separation before exit scamming

>> No.7930565

>>7930520
Scam guys, dont open

>> No.7930569

>>7930472
>Track and label
What do you mean by this?

>> No.7930587

Definitely partnerships being worked out and LINK being sent to big partners.

But what as this becomes more common. The more big players have committed to LINK and gotten paid, the more you'll see them start scooping what they can from the market while its cheap to increase their position and give them an edge by being able to service greater liabilities. Banks and corps aren't communists. They're not going to only take what they're given and that's it.

The next few weeks will be interesting. The next few months will be wild. And the next few years will be awe inspiring.

>> No.7930601

Gargantuan if accurate

>> No.7930606

>>7930569
just fucking around not sure what any of it means

>> No.7930633
File: 179 KB, 640x420, gib.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7930633

God damn I wish link would tank down to sub 40 cents just one more time

>> No.7930635

>>7930538
I’m kind of in a glum mood right now I used to have 1M ATH now I’m near 200k. I hope you are right anon, If link does what you say i can’t wait to see what /biz/ looks like

>> No.7930641

>>7930606
fucking lol

>> No.7930695

there is a reason this shitcoin is always at the bottom of CMC

>> No.7930707

>>7930430
so post the links to the wallets faggot

>> No.7930727

>>7930430
Imagine being so dumb that you actually think this coin is going anywhere.

>> No.7930742

>>7930633
I sold all my stocks and went all in at .41

comfy af

>> No.7930760

>>7930430
This is Sergey paying devs

>> No.7930817

>>7930707
They just get marked as spam, faggot. I've gone out of my way to provide detailed information, while circumventing the spam filter, and you're still too lazy to just go to etherscan and find the wallets based on their position or address, which I've provided? You can go look up the wallets yourself with the info I provided. How dare you call me a faggot. You're the faggot.

>> No.7930860
File: 176 KB, 517x343, 1403715079142.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7930860

>>7930430
Who cares. LINK will never moon anyway.
I'd lost all hope.

>> No.7930870

>>7930760
This is also a reasonable possibility.

>> No.7930871

Hey heyyy heyyyyyy
my WAIFU still doesn't believe in me I'm gonna go to the bank and turn my links into dollars
MM MM NO NO NO

>> No.7930887

>>7930871

My waifu bought LINK because she's not a brainlet.

Sorry anon.

>> No.7930907
File: 65 KB, 1280x720, foryouranus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7930907

>>7930817

>> No.7930954

>>7930707
>0x9a5054b356451ffc717ba83c01b849c4d8ed7d29

its right there you namefag

>> No.7930980

>>7930887
My waifu said to me no no that's a SCAM I said honey! I'm gonna take my linkies and put them into dollars!

>> No.7931008
File: 286 KB, 566x672, 1519484778120.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7931008

>>7930707
kys

>> No.7931058

>>7930430
>deals between ChainLINK and big node operators.

i'd probably call it money laundering personally.

>> No.7931126

>>7930707
>Literally not knowing what Etherscan is.

>> No.7931173

>>7931126
reminder to filter all tripfaggots

>> No.7931195

>>7930430
link is trash no one cares
nice job detective faggot

>> No.7931244

>>7931195
rebecca please, behave yourself.

>> No.7931299

>>7930606
Kek

>> No.7931305

>>7930760
>>7930870
With millions of LINK?

>> No.7931351

>>7931305
well the most he's sent is like 500k each, which is a normal dev salary at current prices, but why would he send it to 4 new wallets and 2 old ones? he doesnt have that many devs

>> No.7931359

SERGEY MOVING HIS LINK TO BINANCE EXIT SCAM INCOMING

>> No.7931404

Did SherlockLink post his thread yet where he was going to talk about IBM?

>> No.7931435

>>7931404
>thinking Sherlock isn't a larper

>> No.7931442

>>7931404
he's posted info in this thread right now. >>7929736

>> No.7931584

>>7930472
youre good. got to hand it to you

>> No.7931588

>>7931173
except for assblaster and sherlock link. The only approved trips of /biz/

>> No.7931846

>>7930954

>> No.7931962

>>7931588
Get the fuck out of my thread

>> No.7932343

>>7931351
They have added staff..

>> No.7932391

>>7930695
>at the bottom

>> No.7932402

Found AssBlasters's old pastebin.
Took a quick glance, it's about piss fetish and incest.

pastebin DOT com DASH u DASH Assblaster

>> No.7932597

>>7932343
Not 6 new devs.

I would like it if other anons could check the etherscan addresses and see if they agree with my interpretation here

>> No.7932692

>>7932597
could be anything, maybe they really are privately selling to people interested and not just on binance. That's what the tokens are for after all. We know they've contracted out parts of the programming, it could be that. They could just be using all of the wallets for the node operators fund and it could be that. I can't really tell, but it does appear that they are sending them to individual people's wallets given the tokens in the recievers.

Or the wallet that got its funds from the dev. wallet is no longer a chainlink wallet and were just witnessing something that has nothing to do with chainlink.

>> No.7932740

So much misdirection in these link threads

>> No.7932753
File: 69 KB, 658x523, IMG_8496.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7932753

AAAAHHHHH I'm sick of these fucking breadcrumbs, somebody tell me already if I'll be rich

>> No.7932768

>>7932753

Patience brother. You will be rewarded in proportion to your faith. This has been foretold.

>> No.7932984

Interesting, rewatching this a little Sergey talks about how the company makes money: I didn't realize they were going to take a cut of the node operators fee.
But already he says it'll be more of a foundation than a company and that he wants to ensure small players can afford the network too, which kind of implies only big players would unless they made efforts to keep cheap nodes.

It's so hard to tell if they really have shit lined up behind the scenes or if it's just any other project that may or may not make it in a limited way
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfH1B85YyFU&feature=youtu.be&t=21m50s

>> No.7933024

>>7932984

Its lined up. To me all it needs is zeppelin_os and its already a winner. Everything else is gravy.

>> No.7933108

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY! HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>> No.7933132

>>7933108
you are a MANIAC

>> No.7933165
File: 179 KB, 451x431, 1519275813244.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7933165

>>7933108
>>7933132

>> No.7933217

YOU MUST BE CERTAIN THAT THAT YOU WILL RECEIVE WHAT YOU DESIRE
CERTAINTY CREATES INTENTION
INTENTION CREATES BELIEF
BELIEF CREATES UNDOUBTEDNESS
WHEN THERE IS NO DOUBT THERE WILL BE NO CHOICE BUT FOR IT TO MANIFEST INTO REALITY
NOW WE ARE CERTAIN, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FAIL
DON'T JUST THINK ABOUT IT WITH YOUR CONSCIOUS MIND
FEEL IT - FEEL WHAT IT'S LIKE TO MAKE IT
FEEL THE EMOTIONS YOU WILL FEEL WHEN LINK HITS $1,000
FEEL THE EMOTIONS OF YOU BUYING YOU DREAM HOUSE AND CAR
FEEL THEM ALL AS THOUGH IT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW IN THE PRESENT MOMENT
IF YOU CAN FEEL IT BEFORE YOU CAN SPEAK IT, THEN THE MANIFESTATION IS WELL ON IT'S WAY!

>> No.7933242

>>7930430
Very interesting anon, as always, salute. keep going, don't let the autism levels dip

>> No.7933363

Guuuuuuys I'm sooo happy to be here. The world is not what it used to be. I luuuuuuuurve LINK. wAKA WAKA WAKA

>> No.7933441

If LINK even makes it to 5$ this board will be hilarious.

If it makes it to 100$ I think we will see some suicides

>> No.7933447

>>7930601
small if huge

>> No.7933472

>>7930707
does the nightman cometh or nah?

>> No.7933493

When will the info about main-net and partners drop lads? I have 100k LINK right now. Should I go all in and buy 250k, or put my non-LINK into VEN and PRL and hope they pump by mid March in hopes of buying more LINK?

>> No.7933555

>>7933493
go all in on link. sell during the btc late spring ath. buy 400link during the early summer bear.

>> No.7933570
File: 8 KB, 246x205, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7933570

>> No.7933588

>>7931351
even if he did you don't pay devs a year up front

>> No.7933589

>>7933472
yes he does

>> No.7933605

>>7933555
This guy can predict the future. Hurr

Sage.

>> No.7933627

>>7933588
we know they dimitri has been working for them since soon after the ICO and they didn't say anything. Who knows how many other people are working with them. Sergey doesn't see it as a company and he doesn't want to be the figurehead. It's more of a foundation.

>> No.7933642

>>7933588
Some of the wallets that have been transferred to from wallet #142 have ended up selling to binance - these are ones from the past, not recently. So it kind of doesn’t fit with the interpretation that they’re direct deals with Sergey. Because why would they sell their LINK if they acquired it for nodes?

>> No.7933692

>>7933493
ven is a relatively safe bet anon. and 100k link is enough to make it. i'm about 50/50 split between the two but then again i'm just another fuckin anon

>> No.7933731

>>7933493

Depends on what making it is to you. If you're just looking for a moonshot to be financially secure I would start diversifying there in case it doesn't pan out, but if the goal is to buy an island you're probably going to need to all in on something.

>> No.7933745

>>7933642
https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xc059a1ffe290de70f4dca3333e5aecf3d3746b03

Here’s the wallet that receives funds from the chainlink dev wallet, and the funds eventually end up on Binance. Couple of weeks ago faggots were crying saying it was Sergey’s exit scam.

Maybe the new top 100 wallets will end up selling to Binance as well, and it is just an advisor dumping his tokens.

>> No.7933795

>>7933441
I’d have to get multiple 10TB hard drives for all the screenshots I’d be taking

>> No.7933842

>>7933642
>>7933745
being transferred to binance doesn't mean they were sold. they could've just been sent there and then distributed to wallets so nobody could track them.

>> No.7933855

>>7930430
Just fuck off and die op. You've been screwed. Deal with it quietly

>> No.7933876

>>7933731
Well, I want to take the money from LINK to load up on other coins if the price singularity meme ends up being real. I'm not just going to cash out when we have more time left in this bubble.

>> No.7933914

>>7930506
are we the same person

>> No.7933944

>>7933876
The singularity is zero retard.

>> No.7933963

>>7933944
I await your pink wojacks when LINK hits $10.

>> No.7934156

>>7933876

I wouldn't be too worried about switching coins mid-bubble, if Link takes off chances are pretty good Bitcoin/ETH will be ten times more expensive at the time also. Make acquisitions at the bottom, sell when delusion is at its peak, buy in again when the market takes an absolute shit, repeat.

>> No.7934179

>>7930430
Just a thought.
A)Precious assblaster is larp
(because noone ever larps here do they?)
B)Precious assbladter is sergay, who also runs the pump and dumps and has a track record having been shut down by the SEC in his last 'project' assets exchange, which he dumped out off before hitting on a special kind of cockgobbling retard here

>> No.7934200

>>7932753
The answer is no, you won,t be rich. Ask the bagholders who bought at 1-1:20 and dumped on you.

>> No.7934222

>>7933217
Weak from a doctorate in philosophy. Weak. Try the stoics instead.

>> No.7934224

>>7930430

I told you he was right. Remember me?

3/2/18

>> No.7934323

>>7934224
kill yourself faggot. Nobody cares about you or your shitty larp you dumb nigger. Go away.

>> No.7934343

>>7934224
Gay as link that. That's 10/gay.

>> No.7934353

>>7934224

>> No.7934377
File: 136 KB, 381x347, ss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7934377

>>7930459
>harder please!

>> No.7934415

>>7934224
OP here. So did I get it right? Also I don't remember you at all. Link to your prediction?

>> No.7934429

LINK is set to rise a shitload in the next 36-48 hours for anyone not paying attention to the charts. We're within a couple weeks of new ATHs, and this time they'll stick.

>> No.7934466

>>7934200
How the fuck would they dump on anybody if they bought at 1.20 you fucking brainlet

>> No.7934517

>>7934466
hey take it easy on him hes a big investor

>> No.7934522

>>7934429
LOL none of my indicators are saying this. What are you looking at?

>> No.7934541

>>7934517

I'm sure he is. He's probably working hard right now to clean his room so he can get this weeks allowance and buy my cryptos.

>> No.7934591

>>7934541
were all so proud of him

>> No.7934628

>>7934224
>>7934224
>>7934224
>>7934224
>>7934224

Here's what the tripfag said >>7654542

HMMM, 6 days to wait until we confirm out he's full of shit just like all tripfag larpers. 3/2/18

>> No.7934655

>>7934522

Everything...

Its going to drop soon-ish for the next 12-24 hours aiming for ~6000-6200sat. Then by 36-48 hours it will be retracing up with the wind at its back and carry up to 7200-7500.

It could retrace back down from there, but all it would take is a bump up to 1000BTC volume and we'll be climbing up toward 8500-9000 sat. I think we'll see that volume show up and we'll stick around 8000 sat for the week following.

>> No.7934725

I'd registered on smartcontract.com and made a smartcontract. My advise to my employer was that it does what you can do in a copy of excel with a web datasource except its unnecessarily complex and ultimately pointless. Never listen to used car salesmen who try and blind you with bullshit faggots

>> No.7934805

>>7934725

You're the reason Microsoft Access is still a thing... pure cancer.

>> No.7934812

>>7934725
excel is not on a blockchain

>> No.7934831

>>7934812

The only programming he knows is Excel macro scripting. Got a real expert over here.

>> No.7934839
File: 57 KB, 1000x1000, ctr,x2200,front,black-c,250,153,1000,1000-bg,f8f8f8.u1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7934839

Link at $1000 would mean my net worth would be $30 million

It's so ridiculous, people have no idea what they're talking about and just spout what they want to happen

>> No.7934853

>>7930430
Nothing to see here - link is a scamcoin, it doesn't matter how many larp posts surround it - it will be 0.10c by EOY, and stay there until the end of time.

>> No.7934873

>>7934628
3/2/18 wasn’t a date back then but now it is

>> No.7934919

>>7934873
march second has always been a date, hillbilly.

>> No.7934946

bot thread

>> No.7934952

>>7934839
>good things can’t happen

>> No.7934955

>>7934831
Actually I used write in c mostly. Then I retired. That being said its not more than a few lines of c either. Now here's the rub, what smartcontract.com does IS EXACTLY as I just told you you can do in fucking excel. And if the web page gets ddosed you can kiss your smart oracle bullshit bub eye.

>> No.7934966

>>7934919
Hun did you read the thread? I know it didn’t have a bunch of pictures

>> No.7934971

>>7934839

$1 Trillion in market cap devoted to the single token that makes blockchain relevant outside of shitty remittances and speculation. Not that crazy.

>> No.7934977

>>7934839

$1000 LINK will exist. It'll take a few years and require the crypto market cap grows, but it will exist.

Keep in mind that in order to service contracts, nodes will need to stake enough LINK to cover the liabilities of the contracts they service. The longer mainnet is running, and the more adoption we see, the less LINK will remain on the market and the higher the price will climb. Before EOY less than 10% of LINK will be available, with the rest locked up by people who are going to be sitting on them.

The token economics for LINK are going to be fun to watch. Increased adoption = increased demand by node maintainers, and by extension traders = increased price. But the more nodes emerge, the less LINK will remain on the market, which will at the same time be reducing the supply. As demand increases rapidly, and supply decreases just as fast, the price is going to end up climbing ridiculously quick.

>> No.7934981

>>7934839
Just don't kill yourself when we go to 1000 after you sell at 10, you pessimistic clown.

>> No.7934991

>>7934955
HOLY SHIT you’re dumb. Monkeys write code?

>> No.7935008

>>7934966
six days to go, rebecca.

>> No.7935015
File: 599 KB, 1569x1077, whenWillYou Learn.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7935015

>>7930526

>> No.7935025

>>7934919
>>7655370

Actually my apologies. I didn’t realize Muhammad was raping you women

>> No.7935040

Let me clarify. Open excel, select a web datasource, any page, pick a value on it. Dump it on a cell, on refresh have the value checked if value is X then put string contract complete in another cell. Keeping it simple for retards.

I ddos your input web page. Contract fucked. Link solves nothing. Are you following me stupids? And that is exactly what smartcontract.com does and if you don't believe me go register on it and make a smartconteact. It's absolutely flawed and all the mug blockchaon and mug oracle does not add a cent of value because if that

>> No.7935064

>>7935040

If you ever use Excel for anything, you're doing it wrong.

This is what separates Sergey from you. He knows not to use Excel for shit. I bet his hatred of Excel is half the reason he started Chainlink. The sooner banks move to the blockchain, the sooner Excel dies.

>> No.7935067

>>7934873
>>7934919
>>7934966
No, he meant that it was the European form of the date, not the American form. I think that's what he meant but he phrased it really badly.

>> No.7935070

>>7934991
>supply
You've not used smartcontract.com have you? I wish I could see the look of horror on your face when you do and it hits you I am perfectly correct.

>> No.7935083

>>7935040
The contracts currently being made on smartcontract.com is not the contracts that will use chainlink node's data

One is a way to make contracts
The other is an oracle network

You silly willy

>> No.7935098

>>7935025
it's obviously a date you kike. what falls apart on the second?

>> No.7935103

>>7935025
That doesn't even make any sense. I'm pretty sure he's just retarded or being obtuse and he does mean March 2nd.

>> No.7935110

>>7935064
So you think smartcontract.com is a spreadsheet now? It's not but the contracts there take data from ddosable web sources. It is a flawed concept. Go use it and you'll see....

>> No.7935119

>>7935040
dude, you're missing the whole point in that smart contracts are stored on blockchains and thus are immutable, permanent, and trustless lol. who can't "fuck" over a smart contract on a blockchain because there are redundant copies stored on every single node. malicious actors get thrown out. this is superior to a fucking excel file on someone's computer lol

>> No.7935144

>>7935083
Nope nope nope. Offers a chainlink option. In all cases examples are data from web sources which as inputs are vunersble to attack. It is shit.

>> No.7935149
File: 10 KB, 225x225, 1518831558516.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7935149

if link reaches $5 i quit my job

>> No.7935162

>>7935144
there is no single point of failure in blockchain tech man

>> No.7935163

>>7935119
So what when you can ddos a time critical data input that is actually visible on the blockchain?

>> No.7935167

>>7935103
>>7935098
>>7935083
>>7935067
Lol calm down my guys I’m just a little board laying around in my hospital bed. Why would anyone care what a tripfag on an anonymous Romanian scat fetish image board says?

>> No.7935170

>>7935110

Contracts can source data from multiple nodes, allowing individual nodes to have downtime without breaking the contract.

Also smartcontract.com allows you to create your Chainlink, but its not running from smartcontract.com, its running on the Chainlink network you wanker. The dashboard != the network. I've had my Heroku dashboards get cutoff with issues while all my services keep running just fine. They're two different things.

>> No.7935186

>>7935162
O yeah? Go make a smartcontract. Choose your datasource. Some value from the web? Publish. Input gets ddosed. Contract not worth wiping your ass on.

>> No.7935189

>>7935163
when it's actually implemented, from my understanding any changes/edits to contracts need to be digitally signed by private key

>> No.7935201

'wallet watching' is nothing more than an act of the most desperate of bagholders
try prove me wrong

>> No.7935208

>>7935170
Nodes all validate data from the input specified in the contract and that input can be fucked with. Even worse it is publically visible.

>> No.7935209

>>7935167
i wasn't even interested until you began spewing your contrarian nonsense, but obviously it's the singularity we've all been waiting for. 6 more days.

>> No.7935216

>>7935186

> didn't read the whitepaper
> has clearly never watched Sergey explain the network

Your skills are outdated and it shows. I'm sure there's lots of office assistant jobs open to apply your mad Excel skills to. You'll never make it as a blockchain developer though.

>> No.7935228

>>7935189
I don't need to.I just need to ddos the input and profit since that is what mug nodes are trying to validate. Fuck me do none of you work near or in IT?

>> No.7935231

>>7935209
It’s how you get people interested into actually discussing things nowadays it seems

>> No.7935236

What do you guys think of cryptocities.net?

It seems like the only ETH game that isn't a Ponzi.

>> No.7935273

>>7935216
Like I say I got to retire and am pretty sure you've had software I've written smeared across your hard drive links cum. nodes VERIFY inputs. Inputs are published publically. Inputs can be ddosed. Contracts are worth fuck Game over.

>> No.7935293

>>7935228

I do, and as a rule the more times a person says "ddos" in a crypto thread, the less they know about tech.

A DDoS would create downtime for data. It wouldn't manipulate the data. The network accounts for this with multiple nodes providing the data, who may be using multiple data sources for it, or different data sources from the one being attacked. You're just saying words and trying to brag about Excel skills... nobody cares about Excel.

>> No.7935300

>>7935236
Tell you what is a ponzi. Link. Only way it could work is with private data sources, which make block gaining the contract publically pointless.

>> No.7935311
File: 695 KB, 1533x1197, Screencap.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7935311

Remember and believe

>> No.7935360

>>7935300

It doesn't require private data sources you unimaginative geriatric. Christ you have no idea how much data we're swimming in now days do you? Nor the number of entirely different subsets of problems an oracle service lets dApps solve? You've got one implementation in your mind and assume its useless for anything else.

Crawl back to your OS/2 machine and dust off chess. Then check back on the LINK price in 6 months.

>> No.7935365

>>7935293
That is not what nodes do. Nodes validate the input which must necessarily be public so any node can see it. Worse the input is specified in the contract. Ddos the input (because it is there for all to see) contract worthless. Only way it works is with private inputs and contracts, but then no blockchain or Nodes. You understand yet?

>> No.7935368

>>7935273
Found the boomer gtfo old fart faggot

>> No.7935383

>>7935293
If you think I'm bragging about Excel step out of the conversation. You are way out of your depth. It was an illustration for stupids to comprehend.

>> No.7935397

>>7930430
AssBlaster didn’t actually predict that new wallets would appear with LINK transferred from the chainlink team. He said they would be buying from Binance. So AB did not predict this. We still need to look for AB’s wallets!

>> No.7935414

>>7935383
> 20 posts by this ID
Slow down there buddy

>> No.7935416

>>7935368
If inputs are visible in a public blockchain then they can be ddosd. Nodes don't help as they can't then read the input. It's profounfly flawed.

>> No.7935437

https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/800ly9/new_top_100_wallets/

>fuck these retards

>> No.7935454

>>7935365

Again you've clearly not read the whitepaper. Its not all there for everyone to see, they support private Chainlinks that aren't visible to other people.

It allows for centralized, single node data feeds, and it allows for pools of nodes all servicing that data. It allows for public Chainlinks, and private Chainlinks. Its a communication toolkit for dApp developers and fintech devs to do what they need with in a way that interoperates between chains.

You understand yet? You think you've successfully declared the nextgen internet a fad because you figured out DDoSes can happen. Congrats on being this much of a brainlet.

>> No.7935477

>>7935414

He's butthurt that its just now dawning on him how little he understands blockchain tech. He feels like an antique.

>> No.7935498

>>7935368
Why do anons try and start generation games? I was outlining the severe unresolvable architectural flaw in chainlink. Who here has made a contract on smartcontract.com? It specifies a publicly visible data input right? So attack that (and its easy to find its public and in the contract) Nodes can't validate. Contract dies. Ouch.

>> No.7935519

>>7935477
I love antiques. I also see nothing in your comments except butthurt faggotry.

>> No.7935545

>>7935519
you pretend to be retarded and he pretends to take the bait. this is all so boring. role playing is the death of biz.

>> No.7935580

>>7935477
So you have never actually used a chainlink contract on smartcontracts.com yet are shilling it here to stupids? Why u doing that?

>> No.7935607

>>7935498
You do realise that means absolutely nothing, right? The current oracle system a lot easier to be tampered with due to being centralized. Hell, if you tamper absolutely ANYTHING with wrong information, it will bug.

It seems like you're a linkie trying to FUD and buy in more cheap LINK. What's your stack?

>> No.7935619

>>7935545
Please explain how public smartcontracts can work when their inputs are published for attack...which nodes do not prevent.

>> No.7935642

>>7935607
It's the inputs stupid.

>> No.7935663

>>7935437
The discussion there is 10 times better than here though.

>> No.7935684

>>7935642
Yes, I agree it's the inputs, and that's my point. If you fuck with *any* system that needs inputs, it will not work correctly. Current oracles will not prevent that. Chainlink oracles will try to prevent that with reputation systems but that will also not be 100% safe, of course.

>> No.7935740

>>7935684
Ok then. So a system that publicly published contracts and inputs is utterly vulnerable irrespective of decentralised oracles. Also note that private inputs are NOT visible to public nodes to validate. QED chainlink is a dead product.

>> No.7935758

>>7934955
You just might be the stupidest person I have ever seen on this board.

>> No.7935770

>>7935580

I have used it when it was still testnet.

What I'm saying is your arguments don't matter. They don't kill Chainlink anymore than DDoSes that happen on the internet kill the internet. It has fault tolerance built in with the ability to use multiple nodes which likely wouldn't source from the same place, and all that will happen in the event you're describing is the node will be penalized for the downtime according to the contract details until the DDoS stops... that's how the model works. They're supposed to be penalized for downtime.

It also ignores that you can use Adapters that require authentication which can easily ignore DDoS traffic that's not authenticated, and that private Chainlinks are possible, so its an entirely contrived example with no bearing on how useful Chainlink will be to dApps and fintech. Its just painfully myopic. Also the testnet Chainlinks were publicly visible, but I actually haven't ran into any publicly visible Chainlinks on the alpha. Afaik they're kept visible only to the Chainlink's creator but if you have an example of a publicly visible Chainlink on the alpha network share it. Otherwise I'm bored.

>> No.7935798

>>7935684
This is in fact the reason a system like swift will never integrate with a public input and public contract system but have a private one. Any public system ie those that utilise link tokens are fucking garbage.

>> No.7935836

>>7935040
HAHAHAHHAHAHA get a load of this street shitter comparing blockchain to an excel spreadsheet

>24 posts by this ID
shoo shoo pajeet

>> No.7935858

>>7935798
You should read the SWIFT institutes report on open APIs. It sounds like they've thought about it and would at the very least consider disagreeing with you.

>> No.7935864

>>7935740
Authentication will prevent changing input data just like it has for decades on the internet. Stop trying to scare people.

>> No.7935876

>>7935858

Ya. Head of WEF calls out Chainlink by name in his book on the current technological revolution.

Nah, it'll never get adopted by anyone. Just ask the guy with the sweet Excel skills.

>> No.7935898

>>7935758
Sit down you are out of your depth

.>>7935770
Nodes are not inputs and are frankly irrelevent and add nothing in a public smartcontract system. Contract is publicly published. Inputs which are also public are published. All the nodes do is validate inputs. Nodes solve nothing because you have published the input to attack and if they get penalised that's even more comedy gold as linkies loose their stakes because of it.

>> No.7935905

Also if you're truly a programmer then you know that I can create an algorithm in my code that must be validated before any input data will be accepted. Your crap data will never make it into the system.

>> No.7935962

>>7935858
But then they did not and used a private one. You heard it here first. Swift will NEVER use a public input/node/contract system as it publishes the inputs providing the attack vector if I want to fuck a time critical contract. The public side oof chainlink (where link nodes live) is thrash.

>> No.7935966

>>7935876
This. Excel is the future

>> No.7935981

>>7935876
It mentions SmartContract.com AFAIK, not chainlink

>> No.7935987

You've had your o shit moment of truth. Frankly the stupid posters deserve loss.

>> No.7936029

>>7935966
Keep trying to fud that chainlink is broken. Fud hard. Does not change the fact it is broken by the very fact it publicly published inputs at all.

>> No.7936073

>>7935040
you do realise the website is not the end goal way of smart contract creation right? it's an example of it.
Goodluck using your broken ass excel spreadhseet for a multi-national creating ledger information from hundreds of remote sites.

You might want to go back to cobbling together vbs from stack overflow, it might be more within your grasp.

>> No.7936076

>>7935981
Go use smartcontract.com. Go resister and make a contract. See that url you pull data from? In chainlink that's public and part of the contract. Your pants are downn and a big ddos cock gets stuffed up your time critical input. Squeal. It's broken. Go home

>> No.7936107

>>7936073

That refutes nothing that I have said.

>> No.7936132

>>7936076
A server cluster solves this issue. Stop wasting our time.

>> No.7936141

>>7936029
Have you read the whitepaper? The part about intel SGX?

If you think this is worst than the actual solutions being used you're un-cultured about the subject. And this comes from a 22yo without any studies in CS

Just read you old fart

>> No.7936170

>>7936073
All smartcontract public contracts publish the inputs. They are worthless in that instant as they give attackers full knowledge oof what to attack, why and when. Nodes change nothing. It's broken by design

>> No.7936175

>>7936076
>hurr durr I'm just going to DDOS a banking network
You can do that right now, this is not a ChainLink issue.
And what you see on the site is the non-blockchain version and it's not even the finished product.
You really think developers never thought about this, you really think you're smarter than the actual people that worked with SWIFT?

Go back to making excel tutorials on Youtube, Rajesh.

>> No.7936199

>>7936107
no you really don't understand what you are talking about.

ddos the smart contract workshop, lets assume its not behind cloudflare or another cdn.. wow you have stopped one method of data input, which is the least likely to be used for any kind of business.
go read the fucking whitepaper you imbicile, you are entirely out of your depth.

t. network engineer who had read the whitepaper.

>> No.7936205
File: 86 KB, 588x588, le thinking face meme.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7936205

>>7936170
What if I input wrong data to your Excel spreadsheet?

>> No.7936208
File: 274 KB, 686x441, 1397344462829.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7936208

>>7936029
>>7936076
>>7936107
>>7936170
BRING BACK THE MEMES AND FUN

>> No.7936232

>>7936107

Here. Here's Sergey refuting everything you've said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wye0KLqaMQI

Why bother spoonfeeding geriatrics. I'm not a nurse.

>> No.7936238

>>7936170
honestly, i don't have the inclination to explain basic fundamentals of blockchain to someone who thinks excel is in anyway comparable.

stay retired, this world needs less of you working in IT.

>> No.7936243

>>7936205
KEK

>> No.7936247

>>7936170
Go to bed grandpa.

>> No.7936262

>>7936141
You just demostrated you don't understand sgx, chainlink or what I am saying. Nodes validate inputs which public blockchains make visible along with ccontracts. Therefore I can select any time critical contract and ddos its input. It's broken. Deeply broken. Only solution is private nodes and blockchain which makes public nodes and link tokens pretty useless.

>> No.7936311

>>7936175
No a banking network is private. A public node needs to validate data it can access (specified in contract publicly) therefore it can be attacked readily. If a public node can reach an input so can an attacker and the attacker can publicly read which one to attack and the contract. Your analogy is wring. Banking networks are not public

>> No.7936345

>>7936076
1) you replied to a lost that had nothing to do
2)>>7935083

Old fart this internet thing isnt for you

>> No.7936379

>>7936205
What if you ddos the source, after all in chainlink the spreadsheet and public input is visible to all. I notice an under age who thinks cloudflare is some magic that stops ddos. The state of chans these days.....

>> No.7936389

>>7936262
Dude... Are you stupid or larping?
I understand perfectly what you're saying, you're just wrong man

>> No.7936390

>>7936311

Not all banking transactions are private. Not all banking transactions are high speed trading. International remittances and bond payments take DAYS to process with current systems FFS. And plenty of banking transactions actually are better served by being public because it makes them auditable. For the rest, there's SGX.

>> No.7936403

>>7936345
But I build it kid. Night now. Chainlink is a fail.

>> No.7936405

>>7936205
Bodied

>> No.7936411

>>7936311
>a banking network is private
https://www.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/7pqo5t/anyone_know_if_link_is_involved_in_the_europes/

So why are they opening their APIs?
https://www.evry.com/en/news/articles/psd2-the-directive-that-will-change-banking-as-we-know-it/

>> No.7936414

>>7936403

Apparently the internet runs on Excel. Who knew.

>> No.7936451

>>7936414
Everything is just another Vlookup

>> No.7936453

>>7936390
Sgx does not protect public inputs. At all. It makes node operations untamperable but that means nothing when the attack vector is the publicly published input which the node cannot reach in a time critical contract with an input under attack....rendering it and chainlink worthless

>> No.7936470

>>7936414
No it runs on ip stacks and dinners. The original and best blockchain.

>> No.7936471

>>7936453
SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY FAGGOT

>> No.7936476

>>7936205
Top kek

>> No.7936529

>>7936453
Not to mention that LINK is just a simple json parser made by a philosophy major

>> No.7936532

>>7936453
Hey man as you seem to be old and I respect old people as one day I'll be one I'm gonna tell you this:
Instead of talking to frogs on an anonymous board, why dont you go ask these same questions in the slack? They'll be more than happy to tell you how wrong you are
Or maybe everyone is stupid but you... Oh well

>> No.7936589

>>7936532
Pay me. A lot. Actually the idea of working near a shitty startup millenial pets.com is too gross. There are answers but chainlink has none of them.

>> No.7936591

>>7936532
i would pay to see the ancient excel 2003 guru go on there and tell them his data input to excel is a better method of smart contract creation...

i doubt he could figure out slack though, he prefers bbs and newsgroups

>> No.7936601

Can someone explain me what makes the tokens worth something?

>> No.7936611
File: 1003 KB, 1000x1338, assblastcalendar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7936611

>> No.7936621

>>7936601
The whitepaper and basic economic understaning

>> No.7936631

Chainlink

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sICSyC9u5iI

>> No.7936697

>>7936631
>43 posts by this id
That's probably your age too

>> No.7936730

>>7936621
Pretentious yet stupid. Muh basic economic understanding. Broken design. End of.

>> No.7936737

>>7936697
He's early 60s for sure.

>> No.7936750

We will all look back on this day and think,
>this was the start of us getting rich.

Hold on tight boys, this is going to be wild.

>> No.7936755
File: 1.82 MB, 300x264, leaving-now.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7936755

>>7936470
I refuse to believe that anyone is actually this stupid, even on biz. My guess is that this guy actually has link bags, but he wants to accumulate so he's trying as hard as he can to FUD - the effort he's going to to slander some 'random substitute excel shitcoin' is a bit excessive for a non-holder.

You need to put a bit more thought into this buddy. I know you want those cheap linkies but I don't think you're convincing anyone here.

>> No.7936760

>>7936601
They are worth nothing except the value a quorum of pretentious yet stupid people attribute to them like the emperors new clothes.

>> No.7936788

>>7936760

And the internet is a fad. We'll just use courier pigeons like the good ol days.

>> No.7936789

>>7936730
It's really basic economy old man. offer and demand/competition in a market/ reputation incentives and penalties...

The whitepaper also explains what the token does, tell me exactly how I was wrong with that reply

>> No.7936792

>>7936730
Don't buy. Simple as that.

>> No.7936798

>>7936760
basic economics, every commodity.
prove me wrong.

>> No.7936815

>>7936798
And this obviously
All markets are psychological, yhe cost of production rarely ressembles the market price, if ever

>> No.7936826

The internet doesn't exist. Its design allows DDoS attacks to happen, therefore it could never exist.

Fucking idiots group hallucinating the internet. Real life has no latency. Excel is all you need. Its realtime af.

>> No.7936843

>>7936755
Saying blatently stupid shit and having the whole thread laugh at you is terrible FUD. Its either a breddy good 8/10 troll who has the tone down, or genuinely an out of his depth angry retiree

>> No.7936851

>>7936826
Subtle kek

>> No.7936873

>>7936843

Ya as a younger but still behind the curve feeling dev I can't call it... its perfect Poe's law.

>> No.7936894

>>7936843
plot twist; subtle shill for the upcoming excel centralised blockchain token ico

>> No.7936903

>>7930430
you guys are either poor, retarded, or both to think all the money added up in OPs post is whale worthy
Barely over 1MM, wtf? lol

>> No.7936908

>>7936873
Kek this

>> No.7936911

GUYS I'M TRYING TO SHILL MY FRIEND DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THE SEAL SOFTWARE LINK WHAT WAS THE OTHER ONE

>> No.7936927

>>7936894
I dont want to say kek anymore but goddamn anon I kek'd

>> No.7936940
File: 896 KB, 6025x5875, husbandu biting tongue.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7936940

>>7936911
Excel

>> No.7936943

>>7936911
Just read him he whitepaper out loud while you hold his hand man, its really not that hard...

>> No.7937037

>>7936903
>t. Poorfag

>> No.7937140

a new meme is born

Can someone make an excel cube?

>> No.7937173
File: 870 KB, 1172x456, amazing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7937173

>>7934977
FUCK yes lads

>> No.7937207

>>7937140
Can we get a ddos cube too?

>> No.7937226

>>7937173
i love this face so much

>> No.7937245
File: 79 KB, 412x412, ahegao11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7937245

>>7937226
>when the singularity hits you

>> No.7937253

>>7935905
>>7936132
Top kek, boomer troll BTFO. Nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger double nigger because your not worth that much effort to properly mock.

>> No.7937359

>>7934977
>>$1000 LINK will exist

>be dAPP dev
>need some data external to blockchain to settle smart contract
>need this external API data every 5 minutes
>could write a simple oracle in about an hour
>instead I'm going to spend tens of thousands of dollars every 5 minutes to buy stinkie linkes to pay some neckbeard to use his json parser

>> No.7937416

>>7937359
This

>> No.7937454

>>7937359
This is a legit problem tho. The economics of the LINK network will be ridiculously complicated, possibly too complicated to solve.

>> No.7937489
File: 88 KB, 553x278, 1517961215966.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7937489

>>7937359

>> No.7937569

>>7937359
>>7937416
>>7937454
>>7937489
What are decimals?
Also the chainlink network can set the price of the access to the node's data according to a USD value in LINK thanks to a smart contract
Also works woth any oyher curreny, automatically swaping it for LINK

>> No.7937586

>>7937489
Didnt mean to quote you, you brainlet.jpg posting anon

>> No.7937595

HEY GUYS. My laywer "friend" keeps trying to get me to invest in stuff on his behalf. I think he's trying to fuck me. Pls advise.

>> No.7937601

Is 1000 LINK even possible? That would be 350 billion market cap.

>> No.7937638

>>7937601
well first of all mcap doesn't mean anything and is just a psychological barrier
secondly if that SEC hearing is to be believed and we see 20 trillion crypto in 2020, what's a measly 350 billion from that just for LINK? at that point if LINK succeeds it's going to be top 3 crypto so 350b would be way too low

>> No.7937646

>>7937601

Assume an order of magnitude growth in crypto as a whole. Assume ChainLink delivers.

Yeah, it’s possible. This year? 50% chance since this will be the year we see a rat race of large centralized tech conglomerates race to adopt decentralization.

Salesforce has a big conference in Late March and another one in September. You bet your ass ChainLink will be a part of it.

>> No.7937663

>>7937601

Give it 5 years

>> No.7937670

>>7937601
there wont be 350 million coins circulating

>> No.7937682

>>7937595
Pls someone respond I'm really weirded out by why he doesn't just do shit himself. I thihnk he's using me.

>> No.7937702

>>7937569
>What are decimals?
Lol congratulations you're aware that tokens are divisible. Such wisdom. Maybe you'll turn your wise brain to the problem that if LINK holders can make more from speculation and hoarding than they can from staking, then their incentives will be at odds with the smooth running of the network. You can't stake your coins if they're on binance.

>> No.7937717

>>7937569
What is playing along

>> No.7937748

>>7937702
says the guy whos gay

>> No.7937832

>>7937646

Ya. 2017 was the year of the ICO.

2018 will be the year some of those ICOs go onto become nextgen tech giants, and existing tech giants start diving in feet first. It'll also be the year of developer toolkits going from a bunch of handy contract templates to fullstack development platforms capable of managing app development, delivery and maintenance end to end.

2019 is the year we see a massive transformation in the space in large part brought on by zeppelin_os standardizing dApp development workflows on Ethereum allowing for more ambitious projects with less of a tangled mess, competing contract chains starting to gain more dominance against Ethereum, and Chainlink enabling interoperability and bidirectional data flow between blockchains and the real world. 2019 will also be when small scale banking pilots start spinning up.

2020 is the year banking DLT projects go online, at which point the whole crypto market is going to see gains like people can't fathom at this point.

Between 2020 and 2025 its going to be a crazy race toward a significant percent of the total current monetary supply being transferred to the blockchain. There are no brakes.

>> No.7937895

>>7937670
For staking right? Good point

>> No.7937910

>>7937832
Reading this seems like 1000 per LINK is actually a conservative estimate

>> No.7937989
File: 62 KB, 1000x960, flat,1000x1000,075,f.u2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7937989

OH MY GOD MY FRIEND JUST TRIED TO ASSAULT ME BY GIVING ME MONEY AND THEN HE WOULD PROBABNLY THINK HE COULD GET THE MONEY TAX FREEE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH I WAS ASSAUJLTEDDDDDDDDDDDD AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>> No.7937994

>>7937832
You seem well versed, what other projects besides LINK do you recommend?

>> No.7938042
File: 112 KB, 734x677, lx6qx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7938042

>>7930430
Stinky linky is going to save /biz/ from the pink plague

>> No.7938070
File: 31 KB, 176x175, 1402024741137.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7938070

>>7937173

nice crop, lol

>> No.7938084

Seriously my friend keeps calling me, keeps asking me to "make money" for him. He's a lawyer. WTF? He's trying to fuck me right?

>> No.7938097

>>7938084
I said make your own money lol. He wants to sue me if he loses.

>> No.7938121

>>7938097
OMG shut the fuck up

>> No.7938142

>>7938121
No, Ravi, YOU shut up

>> No.7938187

>>7938070
Oh fuck I'm gonna delete it because I don't wanna get banned

>> No.7938200

weekend at sergey's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvITkVaOpUs

>> No.7938218

>>7938187
FUCK I can't delete
mods plz no ban I didn't notice it was that lewd

>> No.7938222

>>7937595
Yeah that's illegal because you would be acting as a "broker". Also he's probably doing it to avoid taxes in some way

Here's my advice I'm in law school myself. Don't do it, what he's asking you to do is unethical for a lawyer to ask a friend to do. He could honestly be disciplined if it was reported to the disciplinary board in his state for that.

>> No.7938234

>hey Sergey what a radical party!

>> No.7938251

www.cryptocities.net

DYOR easy money

>> No.7938299

>>7938222
Trips of truth. I already told him I couldn't do it for tax reasons, he still persisted. And then he said Coinbase didn't verify his account. Basically he's a scumbag. He almost convinced me tonight showed his 4 year old daughter on voicecam.

>> No.7938356

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzzrFFivBKk

>> No.7938696

>>7938299
tell him you want 30% of the profits, a legal disclosure drawn by an independent lawyer and his wifes tits with a timestamp

>> No.7938804

>>7930727
Proof?

>> No.7939028

>>7938696
He's a lawyer himself so he would probably find a way to snake out of it.

>> No.7939105

fucking lawyers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvITkVaOpUs

>> No.7939143

>>7938222
wait my friend gave me 140 dollars to buy him btc i sent him, he just got into crypto in fact didnt know shit about it. I just showed him how to download a wallet and sent it to his wallet, you're telling me thats illegal?

>> No.7939187

WHY IS EVERYONE WAIVING AT US
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzzrFFivBKk

>> No.7939346
File: 5 KB, 245x250, 1518968213634s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7939346

How bout if I let you out?

>> No.7939724

>>7930633
bought at 40 the first time, then last week while aqumulatin had to bite the bullet and buy at 80. oh well. in time, it will all be worth it but i wish i could have gotten in lower. i just cant time this thing for shit, ive been wrong every time ive tried to predict anything about it so i just buy when i can now

>> No.7939812

>>7937702
>what is free market that will regulate everything
go to sleep brainlet

>> No.7939915

>>7933165
Nice meme

>> No.7940032
File: 35 KB, 460x276, 0d1f0f2289e4ad08ad655c833c2b68fb60bfacf16a4d359717b07baf43a5791c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7940032

>>7938218
wtf this isnt reddit you nigger. you can post shit way more lewd than that.

>> No.7940420

>>7940032
This is a blue board and the top panel has a giant veiny dick shooting a load of cum into an anime girl's pussy you dumb fucking fagnigger