ChainLink Update

[Anonymous No.7161979]

A look at the trading status of the Chainlink token

New year, new report. The last couple weeks have been very good for Link holders. Let’s look at everything that happened in detail.
News
The December news finally arrived. Sergey wrote a lengthy Medium post and answered questions on Slack. The main takeaways were:
· An ‘initial simplified implementation’ of the mainnet will be released by the end of Q1. It’s a big milestone and Link’s price should see very strong upward action in the weeks prior to the release.
· ‘We have hired, and are continuing to hire developers’. This is nice, but why not mention how many and publish their names? On LinkedIn, only Sergey and Steve show up as SmartContract employees. In crypto, secret teams are not a good thing. Too many people have been burned by scams. While it’s clear that ChainLink isn’t one, the ambiguity regarding hires creates understandable doubts. The Github and Gitter are great, but more transparency is required in this area.

https://medium.com/@CryptoTakeoff/link-1-3-status-update-c479c657d736

[Anonymous No.7162160]

>>7161979
Bit late with that shit analysis

[Anonymous No.7162379]

Just bought 20k BZC, who cares, maybe it'll get to the normies.

[Anonymous No.7162419]

Thanks OP.

[Anonymous No.7162430]

>>7161979
>update
are we time traveling? this is from january you fucking mong.

[Anonymous No.7163428]

>>7161979
>got a hearty chuckle remembering the old daily link update chick in chainmail

[Anonymous No.7163523]

It's been a month and we still don't know how many people Sergey hired.

[Anonymous No.7164038]

>>7161979
the only crypto I have is 150 LINK because I want to belong and I believe. I would kill or die for smartcontract, either. to be part of history

[Anonymous No.7164343]

>>7164038

How is $15m going to be enough ? You done fucked up

[Anonymous No.7164539]

>>7163428
yeah what a weak handed bitch