/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.7039585]

anyone operating a LINK node here?

[Anonymous No.7039661]

You didn't buy BZC yet anon? Kek

[Anonymous No.7039773]

>>7039585
planning to. just need to figure out all of the specifics

[Anonymous No.7039805]

>>7039585
how much link you gotta hold to node? i got 20k wondering if i can make some nice bank

[Anonymous No.7039823]

How do you operate a node for a product that does not exist and that no one is using?

[Anonymous No.7039943]

>>7039661
bazingafags are back? damn.
>>7039823
In the future you autist

[Anonymous No.7040028]

Set up a node on AWS last night. Went through all the docs and whitepaper this morning to make notes. Am about to start picking the node apart and potentially starting to write an external adapter today.

I would get on this stuff now, because by the time the Mainnet launches, there are going to be a lot of people already with working nodes/data.

[Anonymous No.7040070]

>>7039805
none is needed. staking LINK gives your node priority.

[Anonymous No.7040130]

>>7040028
what guide did you use? just the official documentation?

[Anonymous No.7040256]

>>7040028
Where are people going to get the data from?

[Anonymous No.7040418]

>>7040130
Official documentation, the whitepaper, and http://github.com/thodges-gh/Chainlink-Node/

>>7040256
That is up to you. You need to decide what kind of data you will provide. You need to source APIs to find it from.

I have a bunch of ideas already, but I don't want to share them :( sorry, anon.

[Anonymous No.7040828]

>>7040418
It's ok im too much of a brainlet to work all this out anyway. Need to find someone else to partner with, I'll brink the link, they can bring the data, api & programming skills

[Anonymous No.7041188]

>>7040418
so if i make a node, do i get linkies from it?

[Anonymous No.7041464]

>>7040256
>>7040418
Actually, it can be up to both the node and the client what data/API is to be used.

Good thing is, the EU just effectively forced banks to open up their internal APIs to third parties, effectively decentralizing internal bank data.
And this happened the very same year Chainlink is going live.
This is like stars aligning.

[Anonymous No.7041569]

>>7040418
>>7041188

Nevermind I get it. (Actually arsed myself to read)

Are nodes being used as we speak or are they just built and waiting?

[Anonymous No.7041599]

>>7041464
But how do you get that data as a third party? I mean I can just turn up at Citibank and be like, please give me all the apis

[Anonymous No.7041631]

>>7041599
Look up PSD2.
It entered into force a week or two ago.

[Anonymous No.7041729]

>>7039585

I unironically market dumped my stack of LINK yesterday and put it all into Mobius. I'm sorry but the lack of updates, developments, communication and quite frankly the tasteless overshilling of LINK around these parts has ruined my enthusiasm for it. I don't really think Sergey has his heart in Chainlink anymore. Something changed along the way, I can feel his enthusiasm for it waning similarly to how he left NXT like a thief in the night. He probably had a great time raising millions of dollars with the ICO and being a famous celebrity on biz, and I'm happy for him, I really am, but he lost his hunger for success along the way. The Bitcoin superconference will likely be a total shitshow. I've no doubt the price will dump within minutes of Sergey walking off stage. I really enjoyed holding LINK, it was a pretty cool bag to carry for a while, but Mobius is definitely the new wave of oracle tech and has the momentum/edge now.

[Anonymous No.7041766]

>>7039585
Pump group with 40k members will be having a pump on Binance at 7pm EST. You don't want to miss it!
www.discord gg/4gQsHam

[Anonymous No.7041822]

>>7041729
Yikes...you’ll never make it anon

[Anonymous No.7041830]

>>7041729
you don't poo in a loo do you anon?

[Anonymous No.7041959]

>>7041729
>sold all his LINK

Sorry you want to be poor.

[Anonymous No.7041993]

>>7041729

I have read this same comment on LINK threads for about a week. Why dont you come up with better FUD, then KYS faggot

[Anonymous No.7042186]

>>7041729
stale pasta

[Anonymous No.7042200]

>>7041729
>Sergey
>Losing his hunger

[Anonymous No.7042210]

OP, do you need special hardware to run a node?
Or even a raspi would do?

[Anonymous No.7042247]

>>7042210
Not OP, but I'm gonna experiment with a rasp pi 3.

Writing the raspian image as we speak.

[Anonymous No.7042313]

>>7042247
Let us know of your success anon, I have a rasp pi waiting just for this.

[Anonymous No.7042425]

>>7042313
Will do. If I had more funds I'd buy more PI's and make a cluster for this project. Meh, small steps.

[Anonymous No.7042517]

>>7041729
mobius...more like poopius, LOL.

[Anonymous No.7042527]

>>7042247
any quick tech references for further reading? looking to stake my link once the mainnet is up

[Anonymous No.7042596]

>>7042527
I'm just going to start with the tutorial setup and patch from there if necessary.

https://github.com/thodges-gh/Chainlink-Node/

[Anonymous No.7042611]

>>7042247
What’s the advantage in using a raspberry pi for this over your own regular computer?

[Anonymous No.7042693]

>>7042611
None, most likely a disadvantage really. I'm just experimenting to see what this little thing is capable of. Portability would be the only advantage I see so far, the ability to carry a node with you.

[Anonymous No.7042792]

>>7042596
ty meng

[Anonymous No.7042824]

>>7042611
> extra low power consumption
> finally some use for this piece of hard

[Anonymous No.7042947]

Step 1
Updating and upgrading.

[Anonymous No.7042992]

>>7042596
>linux
People still use that botnet? lmao

[Anonymous No.7043043]

>>7042992
what do you use?

[Anonymous No.7043075]

>>7042992
What do you use then? Better be openbsd anon

[Anonymous No.7043096]

>>7043075
probably Windows 10: NSA Honeypot Edition

[Anonymous No.7043120]

>>7039585
Are you asking me if I work at McDonalds?

[Anonymous No.7043140]

>>7043043
>>7043075
Chrome OS

[Anonymous No.7043158]

>>7042992
Congratulations, you're stupid.

[Anonymous No.7043207]

>>7042611
Testing on your own machine or RPi is fine, but when it comes to launching actual nodes you're probably going to want to run them on AWS or similar for purposes of uptime/reliability.

[Anonymous No.7043212]

Will anyone here be using linkpool.io to stake? 30% seems like a LOT

[Anonymous No.7043285]

>>7043140
>this guy talks about botnets
>uses a Google system

Nice try brainlet.

[Anonymous No.7043337]

>>7043212
I'm a brainlet, so yes.

[Anonymous No.7043478]

>>7043212
It just 100% seems like it’s going to be bitconnect

[Anonymous No.7043520]

>>7043478
This
Like hell I am giving to anybody my hard earned linkies

[Anonymous No.7043656]

>>7042247
Thomas said he tried. It didn't work.

[Anonymous No.7043765]

>>7043656
What about $20 revived pentium3 comps?

[Anonymous No.7043866]

>>7043207
If everyone is running on AWS, doesn't that kind of cut down on the decentralization to some degree?

[Anonymous No.7043905]

>>7041729
I know this is pasta but the first sentence cracks me up

[Anonymous No.7043964]

>>7043866
then fire up your nodes on azure and google cloud lol

[Anonymous No.7043965]

>>7043866
I suppose in a sense. The odds of Amazon crippling ChainLink nodes is slim to none, though.

Also, people aren't required to use AWS. It's just convenient is all.

[Anonymous No.7044025]

>>7039585

Do you guys run the node from your own laptop or did you buy a separate laptop to run it on?

[Anonymous No.7044075]

>>7043964
Couldn't I just run it from a desktop PC?
>>7043965
Yea, I gotcha. It just feels somewhat similar to all of the BCH mining being done on antminers rather than individual computers. I recognize that it's basically inevitable, so as I'm typing, I'm realizing that it's basically pointless for me to even bring up this issue

[Anonymous No.7044328]

>>7043212
Yes. Easy passive income, going all in at the start if i'm fast enough.

[Anonymous No.7044658]

>>7044328
But why not watch the Thomas Hodges tutorial on how to run your own nodes and get 100% returns?

[Anonymous No.7044680]

>>7044658
running a node will be a real job. You're gonna have to fight for data feeds. Don't expect people to just hand you money.

[Anonymous No.7044764]

>>7044658
Because i'm brainlet. It just seems to be too complicated for me.

[Anonymous No.7044793]

>Only pool out takes a 30% fee

Somebody better create another pool with lower fees.

[Anonymous No.7044813]

>>7043478
Why? Unless you don't trust smart contracts. In which case what the fuck are you doing here?

[Anonymous No.7044860]

>>7044813
I think he means that particular pool, not LINK in itself.

I haven't looked at their expected payout scheme, but there's no fucking way I'm giving away 30% of my profits.

[Anonymous No.7044920]

>>7041569

[Anonymous No.7044959]

>>7041569
>Are nodes being used as we speak or are they just built and waiting?
nothing's being used yet. the mainnet isn't out. any nodes you can have up on the ruby testnet right now are useless as well.
when mainnet is out in Q2 and the source code in GO is out nodes start being used

[Anonymous No.7044966]

>>7044860
Yeah I know, you'll be staking your link via a smart contract, which you can read. When you look at the hardware they plan on using it doesn't seem that unreasonable, and you'll probably make more than more than that 30% back vs running your own shitty raspi node.

[Anonymous No.7045118]

Does anyone know how the penalties will work?
for example I don't think the penalty should be the same for giving false data as going offline due to power/internet outage
Imagine you have your entire stack of links locked in multiple assignments (because why not maximize your profit obviously by running it on full steam) and you have a power outage or you lose your internet connection thus losing everything? I mean even if you have some back up power/internet supply it's a risk, therefore I'm pretty sure that's not how the penalty would work, but maybe you guys already touched on this subject?

[Anonymous No.7045155]

No one else hopping in linkpool?

[Anonymous No.7045191]

>>7045118
Unless I read it wrong, you have the ability to profit from someones penalty if you catch the bid next.

[Anonymous No.7045258]

>>7045191
You definitely read that wrong. There is no mid-assignment bidding process.

[Anonymous No.7045333]

>>7045118
>Not having a diesel powered backup generator in your bedroom closet

What are you, a fag?

[Anonymous No.7045409]

>>7045155
I will be, I just worry that they'll loose my link one day and be like "LOL MY BAD"

If you're at >10k LINK, link pool is your redemption

[Anonymous No.7045433]

>>7045409
<10k LINK I meant

[Anonymous No.7045439]

>>7045333

[Anonymous No.7045466]

>>7045333
sounds comfy
2 diesel power generator and 3 internet connections running simultaneously should be enough then

[Anonymous No.7045756]

>people not realizing why colos and hosting providers and fuggin AWS exist
yeah let's all run critical enterprise serious business stuff out of our moms' basements

[Anonymous No.7045778]

>>7045409
>>7045433
what if =10k

[Anonymous No.7045928]

>tfw already used my 2018 $500 AWS free credits from university mining shitcoins on V100's

[Anonymous No.7046018]

>>7045756
>He doesn't have a diesel powered generator
>He doesn't have a satellite phone
>He doesn't have a raspberry pi 1
>He doesn't google for local electricians to help set up the node
>He doesn't pay the 14 year old neighour kid $2 an hour to make sure the node runs

Step it up.

[Anonymous No.7046040]

How difficult would it be for someone with very little (read none) backend knowledge to set up a node. The only coding I’ve done has been front end: jquery/js, css, html. Any of you big brain nibbas want to help a brainlet out?

[Anonymous No.7046153]

>>7040028

Ya I anticipate an arms race among developers trying to lay claim to data feeds.

Stay the fuck off my feed ideas. They're mine!

[Anonymous No.7046161]

>>7045778
I'm at 10k too, and I plan on staking it. That's the best option for us IMO. Stake your LINK for a few years, build your stack, and then cash out after ChainLink network has full adoption

We're gonna make it

[Anonymous No.7046711]

>>7045928

[Anonymous No.7047178]

>>7044680
this. you're retarded if you think running a node will be as simple as running a miner for some shitcoin. its NOT a set and forget kind of thing.

[Anonymous No.7047187]

>>7043656
I'm literally 4 commands away from running it.

[Anonymous No.7047282]

>>7044860
I don't know shit about setting up a node, apis, smart contracts and all that bs, I just want to stake my linkies and make more linkies. I will probably take the deal of giving 30% away. Better than nothing.

[Anonymous No.7047670]

>>7046161
I'm a mid tier linkie as well. 12k links. Hoping we can get to at least $30 some day, and make at least 2% monthly. I'd be comfy then. All I really want is like 5k a month. That'd be enough to NEET and not feel bad about myself while pursuing personal interests. I could focus on producing. I could play vanilla wow all day. I could travel, I could do more video projects. And money wouldn't matter. And maybe those hobbies could turn into additional revenue. I could finally live for myself.

Hope we make it bros.

[Anonymous No.7047757]

Where did the idea of having to fight for data feeds come from? The customers will be specifying the data they want and the sources they want it from in the smart contracts. There won't be any fighting for anything, and there aren't any super secret APIs that you can corner the market on. Once a node has a contract it either retrieves the requested data and gets paid or it doesn't and eats the penalty.

[Anonymous No.7048200]

>>7046018
>needing an electrician

why are europoor so retarded

[Anonymous No.7048292]

>>7048200
>Can't see through the most obvious joke

Pajeet or Burger?

[Anonymous No.7048313]

>>7048292

[Anonymous No.7048356]

>>7042596
Assuming you don’t have a ton of dependcies to install and you don’t download the whole block chain and just run light this really should be quick. If there are anons interested in me setting up a vps so you can have your own reply and I’ll decide if I want to figure out how to offer these out.

As far as running the node... I’d need more documentation to see how staking, etc works

[Anonymous No.7048390]

Can you run a node on a rig you are mining with?

bad idea?

[Anonymous No.7048491]

>>7047757
Private data, access to data that others don’t, being the first(which is obviously an advantage) to open up an api, fuck you could even build apis to data that wouldn’t be public to run for smart contracts. I think the ecosystem will be very diverse and offers huge opportunities.

[Anonymous No.7048680]

stinky linky doopity doo
stinky linky no money for you

[Anonymous No.7048716]

>>7043212
On reddit the linkpool guys said it might decrease depending on the future. They're primary reason is they are putting a lot of money up front and users dont put money up front. Either way its for brainlets who cant set up their own servers and these two guys have posted where they live. The UK is not very friendly to scammers.

[Anonymous No.7048852]

I unironically market dumped my stack of LINK yesterday and put it all into Mobius. I'm sorry but the lack of updates, developments, communication and quite frankly the tasteless overshilling of LINK around these parts has ruined my enthusiasm for it. I don't really think Sergey has his heart in Chainlink anymore. Something changed along the way, I can feel his enthusiasm for it waning similarly to how he left NXT like a thief in the night. He probably had a great time raising millions of dollars with the ICO and being a famous celebrity on biz, and I'm happy for him, I really am, but he lost his hunger for success along the way. The Bitcoin superconference will likely be a total shitshow. I've no doubt the price will dump within minutes of Sergey walking off stage. I really enjoyed holding LINK, it was a pretty cool bag to carry for a while, but Mobius is definitely the new wave of oracle tech and has the momentum/edge now.

[Anonymous No.7048864]

>>7047187
And? Did it run?

[Anonymous No.7048990]

>>7044658
The same reason why I don't solo mine. Payout is guaranteed and it requires almost no work. Passive income from link + day job = a 1 way ticket to comfy town.

[Anonymous No.7049074]

>>7045118
Not all kinds of data will have penalties. Also, link pool says they will pay all penalties from their own stash.

[Anonymous No.7049235]

>>7047670
I think your prediction is a little off friend.

I don't think you're gonna get 2% monthly returns, that's insane. But I also think LINK will be worth much more than $30, so it kind of evens out.

I'm planning for 2% gains per year with LINK pool at around $100/LINK. Wait it out, watch your stack increase and watch the price go to $500+ in 2019 and 2020 after LINK takes world financial markets by storm

[Anonymous No.7049345]

>>7049074
How can they do this? Can't a competitor fuck them over by providing bad data on their pool?

[Anonymous No.7049369]

Mobius is much better than link shitcoin. Mobius has partner with WTC right out of ICO. Link has nothing. Link is a scamcoin garbage. Buy mobius and drop shitlink

[Anonymous No.7049463]

>>7049235
2% monthly is totally possible in future

https://medium.com/linkpool/linkpool-economics-ac8642a75801

[Anonymous No.7049484]

>>7049345
They have to input the data so presumably if a source is not trustworthy they'll stop using it.

[Anonymous No.7049525]

SOMEBODY ONCE TOLD ME THAT LINK WAS GONNA ROLL ME

I AIN'T THE BIGGEST COIN BY MY VOLUME

SHE WAS LOOKIN KIND OF FUN WITH HER FINGER AND HER THUMB IN THE SHAPE OF A CUP AND A HANDLE (YEAHH)

GREEN CANDLES START COMIN AND THEY DON'T STOP COMIN
FEED ME THE LINKS AS I HIT THE BUY BUTTON
DIDN'T MAKE SENSE NOT TO BUY THAT DIP
SURE OF THE BOUNCE CAUSE THE COIN'S HOT SHIT
SO MANY MOONS, SO MANY MINE
SO WHAT'S WRONG WITH BUY LOW AND SELL HIGH?
ACCUMULATE ALL YOU CAN, BRO
STINKY LINKIE PORTFOLIO

HEY NOW, YOU'RE IN CHAINLINK, COMFY HOLDING, GREAT BAGS!
HEY NOW, ALL-IN CHAINLINK, LOVING HATERS--STAY MAD!
*all smart contracts are gold*
ONLY CHAINLINK SOLVES THE ORACLE

[Anonymous No.7049590]

>>7049463
Oh I've read the article, I just don't believe it until I see it.

2% monthly gains is unheard of in financial markets. Can you think of a security with 24% returns every year?

It just seems impossible desu. I know crypto is opening up new possibilities, but how the fuck can everyone on the network make 24% gains every year? Where will all the LINK come from?

t. 10k LINK

[Anonymous No.7049930]

>>7049590
I don't know, i just want to believe

[Anonymous No.7049933]

>>7049484
Couldn't the person trying to screw them just hop over to another node they have and repeat?

[Anonymous No.7050007]

>>7049235
>2% monthly returns
>insane
>2% yearly returns
>not insane
I can get 2%/year in just a regular bank account in the states. 2%/month is about 25%/year, and while that's a lot, you have to consider that this is both highly speculative and highly useful in many industries and completely revolutionary. This isn't a traditional investment so there's no reason why it should have traditional returns.

Or consider something else crypto related for comparison: mining. The time it takes to pay of the cost of hardware is about 3-4 months. Said another way, a 10k investment will roughly double itself every 3-4 months, or 33%/month.

While I don't think staking tokens should generate more revenue than mining, 10-15%/month wouldn't be unthinkable within the realm of crypto investing. 2%/month would be a sure thing and incredibly disappointing imo.

>>7049525
Kek

[Anonymous No.7050052]

>>7049590
>Where will all the LINK come from?
Sergey's big boy tummy.

[Anonymous No.7050064]

>>7049525
Amazing.

[Anonymous No.7050203]

>>7049933
Idk, I have a very surface level understanding of the topic, so I'd email them directly for actual answers. But my understanding is that a node operator seeks out data and inputs it in the system. If it lines with the consensus, their reputation increases, if not it decreases and penalties may apply.

Example:
>request for average temperature in NYC
>node A inputs data from source 1
>node B inputs data from source 2
>node A aligns with the consensus
>their reputation increases a little and they choose to continue to use source 1
>node B does not align with the consensus
>their reputation decreases a little and they choose to stop using source 2

[Anonymous No.7050286]

>>7049525
wow, just wow

[Anonymous No.7050330]

>>7049369

Buy Mobius and you too can shit in the streets!

[Anonymous No.7050739]

I wonder how long each assignment will last on average (on linkpool). My internet throttles insanely and I lose connection on occasion.

[Anonymous No.7051047]

Hey bros, not even FUDing... all the mobius shilling is laughable but it got me scared of a scenario where LINK fails. We all know it's the right idea, the trillion dollar idea, but if something goes unfairly wrong...

Anyways, with this fucking pajeetcoin mobius. This is my attempts to answer the FUD points:

My own attempts:

>1) It's on stellar and so it can handle more TPS than eth,

This doesn't matter bc the LINK network is blockchain agnostic and not running directly on Eth, so eth speeds aren't a bottleneck. Also, scaling solutions are coming to eth (plasma/casper) which will solve it anyways

>2) the team

Idk on this one... besides muh pajeets, the people on mobius aren't crypto people with a track record of success. The chainlink team is small but they have years of head start and the main net will be out way sooner

>3) It's safer on stellar which is non-turing complete, but still powerful enough for virtually all smart contracts.

Too much of a brainlet to know if this will ever matter.

>4) Just buy some mobius to be safe

You can make that argument for any coin that mirrors the function of another; you have to make your bets as best you can, if you overdiversify you guarantee you will lose.

Idk bruhs, the break of the cup's handle was hard on me. I've been buying the dips but I'm worried about black swans fucking us up.

Btw this is a real post by a white male living in Boston, inb4 pajeet, I'm not fucking fudding, just help me add to my anti-fud above. Memes are fun, but REASONS are what give us iron hands.

[Anonymous No.7051102]

>>7042693
whats the advantage of a mobile node?

[Anonymous No.7051129]

>>7051047
>>2) the team
>Idk on this one... besides muh pajeets, the people on mobius aren't crypto people with a track record of success. The chainlink team is small but they have years of head start and the main net will be out way sooner

Sergey's been obsessed with Smart Contracts and decentralization since at least 2014. There are videos of him online to prove this.

I feel pretty good about it, especially considering their PoC knocked the socks off SWIFT

[Anonymous No.7051213]

>>7049590
> Can you think of a security with 24% returns every year?

S&P got up to 21% in 2017. Pretty close.

[Anonymous No.7051277]

>>7051047
>pajeet detected

[Anonymous No.7051295]

>>7051047
Crypto isn't a zero sum game. Even if mobius is better than chainlink, there's no reason they can't coexist because they do different things and the market is pretty small. Samsung and Apple, Ford and Toyota, bitcoin and litecoin. Anyone trying to tell you that the only way to make it is with 1 coin is either a scammer or retarded. Missed the boat with bitcoin? That's okay, there's a million other new projects to invest in. Missed the boat on eth? That's okay, there's ant. And on and on.

[Anonymous No.7051471]

>>7051047
Dude, just watch the YouTube video with that chink chick and look for David Gobaud (founder) in the comment section. He reply's to a investor who lost $20.000 worth of Mobius. Extremely unprofessional reaction.

Read the Medium.com article written by Cyrus or look at their whitepaper. You have nothing to fear. I would be surprised if they are going to deliver.

[Anonymous No.7051525]

>>7051047
I think LINK having a POC with swift and with a testnet already out, you can see it's advantage over mobi. They have been working on the project since 2014.
At the same time, you can see the differences on the team. Sergey is trying to capture the big institutions / investors, Mobius is trying to hype on videos and reddit, their audience is "hmm everyone!"
Read the whitepapers and you will realize how CL is much more serious.

[Anonymous No.7051564]

>>7051213
>every year

[Anonymous No.7051601]

>>7051471

Can’t find it- link?

>>7051525
>>7051129

Thx Bros. Sorry to shit up the thread I just genuinely wanted to ask about these points but it’s impossble bc of the shill/FUD meme wars going on right now

[Anonymous No.7051828]

Anyone with half a brain and some working experience would contact a complaining investor privately. Video (4:20 and 10:55 are worth watching) :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r44z0vd7n8&t=722s

https://medium.com/mobius-network/stellars-meteoric-rise-and-why-mobius-is-set-to-orbit-from-it-in-2018-27f49d0bb348

I don't know man, but a co founder writing "get your spacesuits ready" really gives me bitconnect vibes.

[Anonymous No.7052431]

I'm also pretty convinced the ChainLink - SWIFT deal was already signed back at Sibos 2017. It would explain why Sergey doesn't rush hiring a marketing manager or any other staff. I'm not going to start with muh NDA's but a organisation like SWIFT has a responsibility for 11.000 financial institutions to maintain a high standing reputation. I think it would be logical to stall any announcement to make this look like a well thought out strategy.

[Anonymous No.7052575]

Usually if a coin is shilled to high heaven it means it's a shitcoin. But I can't help but be interested in LINK

But 2bh the fact that there are few updates and almost no developers working makes me nervous

[Anonymous No.7052684]

>>7051828
>I don't know man, but a co founder writing "get your spacesuits ready" really gives me bitconnect vibes.

That's why Sergey's silence is ultimately a good thing. I'd rather not see him make Youtube videos with skateboards

[Anonymous No.7052688]

>>7052575
Everyone is interested in LINK. It's just that most people chase moons and forget/don't care. Bagholding is a hard thing.

[Anonymous No.7052715]

>>7048990
But how can you really expect anything like 2% or 5% a month? No investment gives those kind of returns. Seems fucking scammy.

[Anonymous No.7052744]

>>7051828
Holy shit that first pajeet has the voice of a 12yr old girl

[Anonymous No.7052747]

>>7052575
They are working on a private repo.
They supposedly hired developers eoy 2017.
If you want to communicate you need to do it through the slack.
IT can't be a shitcoin when the CL team has been on this since 2014, has a test net, did a POC with swift and Sergey has attended several conferences (and going to another one in february).

And yes, we will probably not see any announcements until we get the simplified mainnet (Q1).

[Anonymous No.7052781]

>>7052431
Not to mention SWIFT would have to be out of their fucking minds to announce that they were going to initiate a partnership with a startup that still has not launched its product.

Same goes for any financial institution.

If Steve and Sergey somehow managed to fuck everything up, the financial institutions good names would remain intact. And that is of extreme importance to them.

[Anonymous No.7052844]

>>7052575
Learn the difference between pajeet shilling and /biz/ shilling.

LINK has been /ourtoken/ since September. Way before the newfags and pajeets flooded us.

[Anonymous No.7052880]

>>7052431
Friendly reminder SWIFT won't even be using Chainlink even when it does finally start using distributed ledger technology.

Here's what it says on smartcontract.com:

"We're proud to be working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle."
>their own SWIFT Smart Oracle
>NOT the chainlink oracle

Never forget than banks are interested in the blockchain technology, NOT some fucking ERC20 shittoken made by some journeyman who walked away from NXT. All you autists who are constantly harping on about "the SWIFT announcement" are absolutely deluded. It's like you just ignore what it actually says on smartcontract.com itself simply because it doesn't make you feel good.

[Anonymous No.7053039]

>>7052880
Swift building their own oracles is just the same as having a centralized oracle.

When you look at the file that talks about swift, you can see that CL is in there.

Why would they use link as the oracle middleware in the images if it's not going to be used?

[Anonymous No.7053062]

>>7052715
It's not some kind of financial product like a share or a derivate. You buy a piece of a system and hopes it get's successful.

[Anonymous No.7053067]

>>7052715
Then don't invest. See >>7050007
Crypto isn't like traditional investing. We're on the ground floor of a new paradigm in global finance. Crypto is so volatile that you should be able to get at least 10% per month just from swing trading.

[Anonymous No.7053071]

>>7052880
Niceb8m8.jpg

[Anonymous No.7053226]

>>7052715
By the way
>No investment gives those kind of returns.

If you invested in let's say a patent for a new radical design for milk and orange juice packaging that would save the industry millions of dollars. You would receive way more then 5% of you initial investment.

[Anonymous No.7053574]

>>7052880
That wouldn't make any sense. Why would Sergey and smartcontract.com work like some kind of subcontractor to get SWIFT's private centralised oracle up and running?

If he wanted to get to the same level as Bill Gates or The Zucc he would sell an x amount of smartcontract.com's tokens to SWIFT.