PinkDate

[Anonymous No.6895060]

Big boys ICO only. Americans welcome.
No KYC.
Token ICO for a Escort app, crossover between Tinder and AirBnB - book date now. Pic related.
So this is not really a crypto, it's more like a traditional share, the dividend is 50% of the profits which will be paid in Monero or Eth.
The token is NOT used by clients and providers - they use BTC, Monero or cash.

High risk, high reward.

https://pinkdate.us/?campaign=4chan-615deab8
Asked the team if I could promote on 4chan and they'll give anyone coming in through the 4chan link 10% extra tokens.
Minimum amount is 8000 shares ($1176) - BUT there's a peak price lock for whole of Januari, so 2.7 Monero (~$860) gives you 8000 shares + 10% if you use the 4chan ref link.

Sex sells, the oldest profession in the world etc. Are you ready for a life long of dividends?

[Anonymous No.6895084]

I looked into this.

20% booking fee will never fly. A hooker would never ever pay that. Why not just list on a free app and take Monero, and keep the 20%?

Makes no sense to lock yourself into this platform and have the platform eat 20% of your profits.

[Anonymous No.6895117]

>>6895060
>Asked the team if I could promote on 4chan and they'll give anyone coming in through the 4chan link 10% extra tokens.

Sounds like bullshit.

[Anonymous No.6895131]

>>6895060
honestly was just thinking the other day that prositution is probably one of the most applicable industries for blockchain currently. thank sfor the tip off FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.6895155]

>curvy
>130 lbs

[Anonymous No.6895178]

>>6895084
Thought about this too, but I think being an escort is a risky profession, you need to advertise properly which is quite an investment if you have no starting capital.
There's also the risk of getting abused if you deal with unverified customers.
I'm not sure what part pimps take, but I'm sure it's even more than 20%.

[Anonymous No.6895231]

shhh don't shill till ICO, we're still in presale

[Anonymous No.6895277]

>>6895178
Escorts have places all over the internet to advertise on. They also often don't have pimps, as far as I'm aware. You're thinking of street prostitutes.

>There's also the risk of getting abused if you deal with unverified customers.

What's the platforms' plan to "Verify customers"?

They put the platform before the token. It's just an idea, they don't have any expertise and haven't even dabbled in executing it. You're buying an idea by an anonymous team.

Spankchain has a product coming to market and it's only at 130 million. Buy that if you want to invest in vice.

This is a trash scam ICO, as far as I'm concerned. The whole token rests on them executing this "killer escort app." These get shut down all the time. They don't have any protections against that.

[Anonymous No.6895327]

>>6895117
Sarah Stevens is the vp, she's on telegram.

[Anonymous No.6895422]

>>6895277
Got to admit that I also had many doubts about it, but I want this to work.

This is literally why blockchain was invented, to give the power back to the people so to say.

>These get shut down all the time.
How would they get shut down?
I've been in the Slack for a while and I have to say, the team (mainly Brad) has an answer to everything.

[an oldfag No.6895497]

>>6895060
i like this. might throw a few eth at it.,

[Anonymous No.6895533]

>>6895422
okay, it's a good use of the blockchain, but why is the entire thing premised on their platform and their 20% fee? why do they think they deserve 56 million dollars in revenue?

this is the easiest thing to replicate, and they don't have any competitive advantage over a competitor. anyone can build a token tomorrow and do the same thing for cheaper.

what is being sold, then? A dream? A wish? A plan on a white paper?

90% of tokens have more than that going for them.

[Anonymous No.6895652]

>>6895533
There will be others certain. Moreso if this thing will gain traction.

But Uber is still the biggest ride thing app. AirBnB is still the biggest vacation house rental site. Tinder is still the biggest dating app.

There are alternatives, but once people are familiar with one there's a fat chance they stick with it.

[Anonymous No.6895727]

>>6895327

>excuse me m'lady, i am anon, may i be your guide through these murky parts of le dark web ;P

[Anonymous No.6895831]

>>6895727
XXXXXXDDDDDD

[Anonymous No.6895903]

>>6895652
not if a cheaper competitor comes along with lower fees. Whores will go where the profits are, and customers will go where the whores are.

There's nothing in this platform that deserves 56 million in revenue. You know where they'll make their only and largest revenue stream? The fucking morons that think this is a good token to pre-invest into.

They've done nothing to prove any capacity to execute this. They have a slick website and a thin white paper with almost no concrete path to executing this.

It's as bad as Upfiring.

[Anonymous No.6895993]

>>6895903
I agree. Let us all not invest. Nothing to see here folks. Wait for the ICO instead.

[Anonymous No.6896056]

>>6895993
do you know how many active ICOs there are currently, with promise, real teams, backers, and customers?

You can't FOMO every single ICO. You assess the coin on its merits. You're buying into this because you like its idea, even though the team, white paper, planning, and long term vision of this is total shit.

[Anonymous No.6896088]

lol this must be a joke.
y-you guys aren't serioulsy going to throw money into this r-right?
No way people on this board is that stupid RIGHT GUYS?!

[Anonymous No.6896192]

>>6895903
They don't really need a whitepaper because they got nothing technical going on on the blockchain. It's just a token.
They just make use of the blockchain for their product.

I'm really excited and a bit nervous about the actual product, the demo they showed looks quite nice, but they don't want to spill to much details about the rest of the infra and backend, so for that I can only hope it's good and being worked on.

>Upfiring
This is from a PnD Discord and a torrent token is literally retarded, they got private trackers for that shit already. And torrents are used by pirates who want shit for free so why pay for shit that's free? They'd use Steam or Netflix if they want real service.

This actually solves a real problem AND this problem happens to be in a billion dollar industry.
I'm willing to take the risk and >>6895993 sorry but I'm trying to accumulate as many shares as I can in any way I can so I'll keep shilling this.

But if you're not convinced, by all means, don't invest.

[Anonymous No.6896315]

>>6895060
Looks interesting actually