[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 9 KB, 350x350, LINK-Logo-21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6032800 No.6032800 [Reply] [Original]

BREAKOUT IMMINENT

I REPEAT

BREAKOUT IMMINENT

>> No.6032847

You base this announcement on nothing.

>> No.6032873
File: 21 KB, 300x166, uh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6032873

Pajeet iffy, uh, Sergey got the linky, uh
linky stinky, uh, /biz/ holds till fifty, uh

>> No.6033025

>>6032800
I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet.

>> No.6033075
File: 681 KB, 1119x610, 9CAE98AC-D3EC-4B34-B839-981451C9C18C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6033075

>chainlink breaks out
>it was from an actual commit!
>check github
>new: code of conduct.txt
mfw

>> No.6033102

>>6032847
this whole coin is based on nothing

>> No.6033184

>>6033025
Cool, so that begs the question, why are you so seemingly emotionally invested in the happenings of ChainLink? Something isn't right here. Are you a FUDing faggot trying to buy cheaper? I believe this to be the case. Kill yourself, LOSER.