/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.5911567]

Apologize

[Anonymous No.5911618]

I apologize for making FUD threads saying Sergey exit scammed 32M and hasn't been on twitter in 2+ months. Forgive me LINKIES, I'm sorry to what ever weak hand filled my 15 btc order at 0.15

[Anonymous No.5911672]

>>5911618
Nice

[Anonymous No.5912138]

>>5911567
BURGERS AND FRITES FOR EVERYONE!!!!

[Anonymous No.5912223]

what's a REALISTIC price target for EOY 2018? thinking about selling some XLM for LINK

[Anonymous No.5912284]

>>5911618
You removed the weak hands from the fold. Which is why we've had some sustained growth.
You did well, we commend you.

[Anonymous No.5912536]

>>5911618
I will never apologize for stinky pajeet linky jokes. Stay poor, faggots! :D :D :D

[Anonymous No.5912614]

>>5912223

look at the market cap with this insane market it could be even 10 dollar in a short time.

[Anonymous No.5912784]

>>5912614
is there a project roadmap?

[Anonymous No.5912858]

Tfw when you just read the whitepaper when it was only 0.70 and you just have funds to put in

[Anonymous No.5912906]

>>5912784

next step will be in Q1 so we don't have to wait that long.

[Anonymous No.5912926]

>>5911567
I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet.

[Anonymous No.5912942]

>>5912858

doesn't matter.
usually i would never buy at ATH or anything but look at ripple or tron, chainlink can go up insane.

[Anonymous No.5912985]

>>5912906
yeah but is there a project roadmap

[Anonymous No.5913003]

>>5912985

look for yourself faggot i will not spoonfeed you.

[Anonymous No.5913015]

>>5913003
I did, couldn't find it

[Anonymous No.5913032]

i've been trying to tell you faggots that the FUDders were the same people accumulating

[Anonymous No.5913037]

>>5913003
anon pls

[Anonymous No.5913056]

DO I BUY IN RIGHT NOW

[Anonymous No.5913060]

>>5913003
anon.. pls..

[Anonymous No.5913077]

SELL ITS OVER

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.5913078]

Link doesn't even have a road map, scam coin.

[Anonymous No.5913080]

>>5913003
AAAANOOOOOOON PLEEAAAAASEEEEE AHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.5913084]

>>5911567
This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern.

[Anonymous No.5913085]

>>5912942
I tought that yesterday too and look now, I am just gonna buy it. I have read the paper, I am here since eth was around 15 bucks, so pretty early and this seems like the next big thing in blockchain/crypto.

[Anonymous No.5913091]

>>5913003
_ANON_

[Anonymous No.5913109]

>>5913003
I KNOW YOU'RE THERE, ANON

[Anonymous No.5913221]

>>5913084
u w0t m8

[Anonymous No.5913256]

>>5912223
$100 is the modest estimate

[Anonymous No.5913281]

>>5913256
why

[Anonymous No.5913411]

>>5912223
realistic?
$500.32

[Anonymous No.5913434]

>>5913411
listen here you little shit

[Anonymous No.5913446]

Tfw no cheap LINK left for sale. I hope you accumulated. $60 once main net up Q2 2018

[Anonymous No.5913459]

>>5911567
Sorry linkies, pls dump price so I can buy in.

[Anonymous No.5913467]

>>5913446
>ETH will take up to 12 hours to transfer

Just end my life

[Anonymous No.5913523]

>>5913411

alright sold 5K XLM for 3.3K LINK, if this shit doesn't hit at least $500.32 EOY I'm coming for you

[Anonymous No.5913556]

SHORTY GOT LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW

[Anonymous No.5913589]

>>5913523
>inb4 $500.31

[Anonymous No.5913683]

>>5912926
>PhD in crypto economics.

[Anonymous No.5913751]

>>5913683
yea, he should have put token economics, which is extremely obscure/irrelevant almost made up PhD but there are some of those out there

i have never heard of a crypto economics PhD lol

[Anonymous No.5913817]

>>5913084
>I have a PhD in crypto economics
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


INTAKE

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.5913912]

>tfw when tried to sell linkies at ATH a few days ago

I will never sell my linkies again.

I will never sell my linkies again.

I will never sell my linkies again.

I will never sell my linkies again.

[Anonymous No.5913943]

>>5913084
>This makes sense if you took a few advanced cryptoeconomics courses. The problem is that node operator incentives are fuzzy at best and not even figured out fully by the team (see the gitter for Steve stuttering about this). When I brought it up to Ari Juels, I told him that in the way the network is expected to be used, the fees payable to node operators would actually decline as requests become more ubiquitous because as the network grows it becomes cheaper to use. Ari admitted that it was a great question but that they were "actively pursuing research in that area." I sold my LINK immediately after that and saw a significant dump on the binance charts. It's pretty clear these guys are pulling you along making you think they're doing something revolutionary when the incentives aren't even fully determined yet. I saw Ari Juels speak at a conference recently where he mentioned tokens and asked him about the token economics of a node staking system like the Chainlink network is planning to use. I have a PhD in crypto economics and mathematics. Crypto incentives in Chainlink are a legitimate concern.

This is PASTA. People keep posting this to drive to scare people out so they will pump their shit coins.

[Anonymous No.5914044]

>>5913943
No shit.

[Anonymous No.5914213]

>>5914044
I just want us all to make it to lambo land friendo.

[Anonymous No.5914348]

buy the dip

[Anonymous No.5914379]

It's dipping again, buy buy buy

[Anonymous No.5914403]

aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh