/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.58141293]

Where the fuck is it

[Anonymous No.58141313]

>>58141293
Do not question Sergey

[Anonymous No.58141322]

>>58141293
>he thinks another carrot on a stick invented by Sergey will ever materialise or make any difference to the price if it actually does

Lmao, it's been 7 years and that fat fuck still hasn't delivered real staking you retard.
Chainshit is a scam and a slow rug.

[Anonymous No.58141324]

>>58141293
>>58141313
>week until Q1 ends
Chainlink labs lied again? Color me surprised
THE cuckolds of crypto

[Anonymous No.58141345]

>>58141324
The team owes you nothing

[Anonymous No.58141359]

>>58141345
Then fudding and destroying community sentiment will continue until the price improves.

[Anonymous No.58141376]

>>58141345
Me? No, I don't hold Chainshit. But they owe investors 70 million tokens that they dump every year based on fake narratives
THE cuckolds of crypto

[Anonymous No.58141407]

>>58141376
>furiously typing in 3+ threads refreshing every minute to tell everyone how he is NOT holding "Chainshit"
Kek. Totally not unhinged.

[Anonymous No.58141429]

>>58141407
hilarious to see, dude is refreshing between 5 LINK threads minimum at the same time making sure to tell everyone how he doesn't hold LINK kek

[Anonymous No.58141458]

LINK is so fucking based the way it makes you seethe, truly amazing.

[Anonymous No.58141508]

>>58141376
>investors
yaaaaaaa, youre not an investor you fat fucking slob

[Anonymous No.58141598]

>>58141324
Guess it's not over until it's over but the complete silence just feels like every other time they let a deadline slip. At most we'll get some passive aggressive discord message but most likely it will just be completely ignored until we start talking about CCIP dropping at smartcon.

[Anonymous No.58141619]

>>58141407
>>58141429
>>58141458
>>58141508
>chainshit avocados on damage control
Lmao, you can't even defend your dogshit investment in any way other than attack the people who point out just how much link shat the bed.

[Anonymous No.58141645]

[Anonymous No.58141810]

>>58141324
>>week until Q1 ends
>Chainlink labs lied again?
When did Chainlink say Q1?

[Anonymous No.58141860]

>>58141810
I believe Kemal said it on a twitter space.

[Anonymous No.58141879]

>>58141860
I know for a fact that Kemal said "early next year", I'd love to hear source that he said Q1.

[Anonymous No.58141900]

>>58141324
coming tomorrow, check em

[Anonymous No.58141924]

>>58141879
The Q4 product update they deleted

[Anonymous No.58141938]

>>58141924
>th-they deleted it!
whatever you say, bro

[Anonymous No.58141955]

>>58141938
They always upload them to youtube, the Q4 q&a was on there as normal and is now the one quarterly q&a absent.

[Anonymous No.58141963]

>>58141955
If you say so.

[Anonymous No.58141989]

>>58141963
I'd also point out in their Q2 q&a Kemal explicitly said they're aiming for general access release by end of 2023.

[Anonymous No.58142015]

>>58141989
Yes, "aiming for", and they couldn't make it apparently.

Don't get me wrong, I'm frustrated as hell that it's taking this long, I honestly expected it in late 2021.
But saying "they lied again muhurfdurf" is just childish nonsense.

[Anonymous No.58142062]

>>58142015
All deadlines are just 'aiming for' ultimately. That doesn't absolve them being observed for work performed and communication.

[Anonymous No.58142111]

>>58142062
>All deadlines are just 'aiming for' ultimately.
The difference is that they are completely self funded. No parent company, Venture Capitalist or Angel Investor firm breathing down their necks to meet deadlines. For better or worse, everything they deliver will be delivered at the exact moment they feel it's ready. Not a minute before.

[Anonymous No.58142130]

>>58141619
shut up cock boy.

[Anonymous No.58142135]

>>58142062
>All deadlines are just 'aiming for' ultimately.
No they fucking aren't.

[Anonymous No.58142142]

I think Chainlink is a good project.

[Anonymous No.58142161]

>>58142135
They are exactly that, sometimes there may be repercussions for falling short but as >>58142111
says, there's no major pressure for CLL. So far the only cost has been collapse of the community and they haven't seemed too sad.

[Anonymous No.58142262]

>>58142161
The "community" for Chainlink has aways been a limiting factor for the project, not a boon. Incel nazi frogs yelling "bend the knee" for years on Twitter while obsessively fudding are not an asset to any community, especially since they are practically dead weight that does not interact with the product at all.

Fuddies like to make fun of Chainlink for building an actual community (meet ups, hackathons, BUILD etc) but that is the stuff that actually benefits a project in the long run. They need more developers to build with Chainlink, not bitter neets throwing tantrums when the price action sucks.

[Anonymous No.58142274]

>>58142161
>They are exactly that
No, they are not.

>the only cost has been collapse of the community
The community collapsed in 2018.

[Anonymous No.58142309]

I found this video from 2040 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xL-VX3WbA9U

of a linkie sitting on his front porch talking about the good old days when Link mooned to $50

2040 prices
BTC $1,000,000
ETH $75,000
Link $19

[Anonymous No.58142328]

>>58142111
in other words, no accountability

[Anonymous No.58142367]

>>58142328
Exactly. Also no suits pushing out half baked products. It's a double edged sword.

[Anonymous No.58142438]

>>58142367
I get that but in my experience pressure leading to a 80% quality project is always always superior to open ended output aiming at 100%. The latter bloats, spins out and dissipates.

[Anonymous No.58142487]

>>58142438
Star Citizen is a similar case. There is a vision, there is plenty of no strings attached money and there is no accountability. Both are too big too fail in terms of funding in my opinion though. Internal strife is probably the only thing that can topple these projects.

[Anonymous No.58142492]

>>58141900
^
>>58142309
>>58142438

shut up retards I got dubs signalling the CCIP release

[Anonymous No.58142634]

just heard you guys won, congrats!!!

[Anonymous No.58142645]

>>58141645
Is that the Serg on the bottom

[Anonymous No.58142653]

>>58142634
Thanks for sharing!

[Anonymous No.58142670]

>>58142634
>2 minutes ago
Lmao what's up Adem

[Anonymous No.58142713]

>>58141810
Early means Q1, Cucklink>>58141860
advocate

[Anonymous No.58142749]

>>58142713
>Early means Q1
source?

[Anonymous No.58142758]

>>58142634
It will never not be funny that Adem & co are so obsessed with cuckoldry, chastity cages, tiny penises and black guys. How is pic related not absolutely unhinged and the biggest self report ever? Ain't no way this porn addicted losers didn't end up tugging it raw to BBC and sissy shit on /gif/

[Anonymous No.58142769]

>>58141322
>staking isn't real
oh no does this mean i won't get the 0.432% rewards paid in ticker Link I was promised?

[Anonymous No.58142896]

>>58142015
>WHERE DID THEY SAY Q1 2024?
>YEAH I KNOW THEY SAID 2023
>YEAH I KNOW THEY SAID 2022
>BUT WHAT ABOUT Q1 2024 WHERE THEY SPECIFICALLY USE THE WORDS?!?!
>yeah im upset too...im just a cuck who is over invested and have to justify my brainlet trading actions with cope

You are as dishonest as you are stupid, a powerful combination.

[Anonymous No.58142907]

>>58142896
2022 was the only hard deadline they missed.
"Aiming for" is not a deadline, and "early" is not Q1.

[Anonymous No.58142920]

>>58142907
And it was only "anticaped" (Kemal)

[Anonymous No.58142925]

>>58142907
>yeah the deadline in 22 was hard and they missed it
>every deadline they've missed since is no big deal

This logic is so nigger tier I can't even fathom it.

[Anonymous No.58142932]

>>58142925
>every deadline they've missed since
They haven't set any deadlines since.

[Anonymous No.58143233]

>>58142262
>The "community" for Chainlink has aways been a limiting factor for the project, not a boon.
you're a twat advocate. The community is what made the project still relevant after 2017 ico run. So much so a year or two a go they publicly stated on twitter they want more meme magic from the community. You would know that if you didnt join the shit show that is CLL this year

[Anonymous No.58143411]

>>58143233
>The community is what made the project still relevant after 2017 ico run.
Oh yes, the wall-to-wall fud sure helped a lot.

[sage the profane No.58143453]

>>58141900
shut the fuck up you retards. I got dubs. End of discussion. CCIP COMES TOMORROW

[Anonymous No.58143454]

>>58143233
You're giving yourself too much credit. CT LINK marines were a cancer and still are a cancer. Though I probably prefer the disillusioned black pilled whiners they have turned into today, instead of the smug spamming perma bulls they used to be. At least the whiners are lolcows instead of cringecows.

[Anonymous No.58143754]

>>58143411
There would be no need for fud if fat retard sergey actually delivered anything
you fucking avocado nigger

[Anonymous No.58144215]

>>58142645
thought exactly the same
bottom is sergey announcing CCIP GA at the end of march

[Anonymous No.58144364]

>ethereum finally doesnt rape you with fees anymore
>satoshisync and btc defi about to take off thanks to ordinals
>gamefi and nfts coming back slowly
>sol flipping bnb
>bnb still making shitloads of money regardless
>doge/shib resurgence

... and ccip is still nowhere to be seen.

[Anonymous No.58144409]

>>58144364
selam adem
hole you are fasting khouya

[Anonymous No.58144466]

>>58144364
>he actually expected chainshit to not miss another bullrun

lmao

>>58144409
kek baggie

[Anonymous No.58144521]

>>58142925
its like they all lack basic reading comprehension
chainlink only once set a hard deadline hence they only once missed it
what part of that is so hard to understand

[Anonymous No.58144564]

you're all going to pay for ignoring my digits. i will nonstop smug post and ruin this board for being right.

CCIP TOMORROW

[Anonymous No.58144690]

>>58141293
its here.

Total count of transactions in the last 24 hours: 4185
Total fees in the last 24 hours: 8917.7530861
Total count of transactions in the last 1 week: 30740
Total fees in the last 1 week: $63386.0788491
Total token USD value transferred in the last 1 week: $13,598,023.70

[Anonymous No.58145112]

>>58142262
The "community" is literally what bankrolled them for the last 7 years you fucking avocado kike. It's retail giving the money and they haven't delivered the goods.

[Anonymous No.58145228]

>>58145112
Give the avocado a break, he needs to work overtime because retail figured out the chainlink scam and nobody's buying up sergay's dumps anymore, the avocados now need to work extra unpaid overtime to try and salvage any kind of sentiment on /biz/ and twatter.
Too bad it's completely fucking dead, kek

[Anonymous No.58145533]

>>58141324
they never said Q1
however they did promise general availability by end of 2023 lol

[Anonymous No.58145586]

>>58141293
they pivoted and went all into cswap support

[Anonymous No.58145823]

>>58141293
only coexists with circle's CCTP afaik
don't know which projects are promising to have it integrated though
checked out >>58145586 when they had ads running on biz some days ago but i am too much of a pussy to give it a shot

[Anonymous No.58146020]

Insider here, im an actual dev for chainlink. I'm sorry to say anons but its been delayed.
They will announce this in the next few weeks. We are aiming for full general access release by the end of Q2 2024. CCIP summer is gonna be real. Get excited anons! It's been a long time, the moment you've been waiting for is almost here at last!

[Anonymous No.58146317]

>>58142161
The major pressure is in making sure it's works as intended. It has always been there, they just don't need to adhere to any deadlines and thank god. Do you really want investors demanding releases before their time for technology revolutionizing the financial system?

[Anonymous No.58148270]

>>58141293
Chainlink releases are starting to remind me of the Cole Bar Hammer.