Mere days are left...

[Anonymous No.5807517]

Are you ready /biz/?

[Anonymous No.5807571]

>>5807517
FTFY

[Anonymous No.5807617]

>>5807571
True. Req Will leave link in the dust. Every coin will leave link in the dust. I'm glad I didn't buy more than 1k link. If I was all in I might've kms

[Anonymous No.5807627]

>>5807571
Are you from the future?

[Anonymous No.5807630]

Just 1 day left

[Anonymous No.5807767]

>>5807617
LINK and REQ are brothers. They've always been together in market cap. Now one needs to rise or the other needs to fall.

[Anonymous No.5807804]

>>5807767
It's best to have both.

[Anonymous No.5807819]

>>5807571
>>5807617
Request aims to be highly tied to ChainLink, as any other project relying on Smart Contracts.

Stay poor.

[Anonymous No.5807858]

>>5807517
You wish, faggot. It won't happen. You'd better off loading that money into XLM

[Anonymous No.5807872]

>>5807517

Days?

ITS HOURS

STRAP IN

[Anonymous No.5807945]

>>5807517
There are three horses in this race and they're all coming first

[Anonymous No.5808001]

>>5807945

[Anonymous No.5808136]

>>5807804
I'm 30% ETH, 30% LINK and 30% REQ. I am ready for anything.

[Anonymous No.5808187]

>>5807945
>>5808001
When's the dip for this?
By the time I found out about this coin, it had already mooned. I need to buy but not that the top.

[Anonymous No.5808208]

>>5807617
Req is one of the literally millions of use cases for Link.
Let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.5808303]

>>5808187
There was a point when ethereum reached its ATH of $10 and there was someone like you waiting for a dip of $1 to get in and they missed a boat as a result.

Don't be that anon. 2018 and 2019 will be absolutely insane for these three. Get in now or regret it for life

[Anonymous No.5808391]

>>5808187
>When's the dip for this?
Quantstamp? They announced a partnership. They won't go back to pre partnership prices.

[Anonymous No.5808468]

>>5808391
So buy at 45 cents
Dammit. I missed it by 3-4 days.

[Anonymous No.5808568]

>>5807517
This is the fate for stinky linky

[Anonymous No.5808612]

>>5808468
I was going to buy Quantstamp and Mod when Salt moons so I feel sick the last few days. It was 38 at its lowest yesterday try get in at 42 or lower.

[Anonymous No.5808626]

>>5808568
come on, that FUD is so weak that even your parents are embarrassed by your retardation at this point

[Anonymous No.5808697]

>>5808626
Accept your fate.

[Anonymous No.5808770]

>>5808001
>>5807945

Whats the one with a Oand X

[Anonymous No.5808904]

>>5808770
That's Quantstamp.

[Anonymous No.5809004]

Can it hold off til the end of the week?

[Anonymous No.5809048]

What's our ultimate ceiling?

[Anonymous No.5809074]

>>5807517

REQ is headed for 5 dollars.

I'm really not sure about LINK. The team seems to be a single man with no computer science or software engineering background... What exactly is the reason for /biz/ being so bullish about it?

[Anonymous No.5809208]

>>5809074
A lot of projects want to use LINK's decentralized Oracle systems REQ is one of those companies.

[Anonymous No.5809335]

>>5807617
hope to see you in a while when link blows up, provided you didnt kys for being so smug and only having 1k link

[Anonymous No.5809349]

>>5809074
>The team seems to be a single man with no computer science or software engineering background...
And that matters why?

[Anonymous No.5809476]

>>5809074
>I'm really not sure about LINK. The team seems to be a single man with no computer science or software engineering background... What exactly is the reason for /biz/ being so bullish about it?

this is the only reason I know req will do better than link in the short term. Req is so easy for brainlets to understand it's attracted the lowest of the low iq normies and redditors. I'm 50/50 but it's becoming obvious LINK will be the big winner while req will moon in the next couple of weeks.

[Anonymous No.5809485]

>>5809074
kek one man. Even if it was only sergey guess what? He ran a fucking POC for SWIFT and had top notch advisors and a peer reviewed whitepaper and has Zeppelin OS onboard. FFS not everything needs 100 devs and skateboards

[Anonymous No.5809499]

so both of these are going to 1b+ mcaps?

[Anonymous No.5809509]

>>5809074
Are you dumb? Without link request has virtually zero chance at processing any fiat payments. If you don't trust the SmartContract team you shouldn't be so confident about Request

[Anonymous No.5809635]

>>5809485
Personal anecdote. I took over an app project coded by a Russian Dev with a degree in philosophy and his code was top notch.
It wasn't Sergey obviously but one of the many reasons I have confidence in this coin

[Anonymous No.5809725]

>>5809499
LINK is getting to 50b mcap this year I think
REQ if successful will settle at 15-20b

[Anonymous No.5809817]

>>5809635

Sergey doesn't actually code, but Steve seems pretty cool from his blog.

Both projects have nearly identical marketcap and req is resorting to the shadiest hype tactics imaginable (they talk about the token price in the white paper lol and how burning will be lucrative for investors). Everyone who bought req has bought req unless it catches some sort of normie zeitgeist magic like ripple did. Chainlink is the one you want now.

[Anonymous No.5809838]

Wait why is REQ gonna take off?

[Anonymous No.5809874]

>>5807517
I've said it from the beginning, link is a shitcoin shilled by pajeets.

[Anonymous No.5809887]

>>5809838
because whales were accumulating for a while now

[Anonymous No.5809956]

>>5809476
>>5809485

Can you actually address the concern. I'm not FUD, I own 10K LINK, but how exactly do you expect one man with no formal education on software engineering to pull this off? Do you have evidence he's hired professionals?

>>5809509
Is LINK the only Oracle solution?

[Anonymous No.5810005]

>>5809725

More like the other way around.

>>5809838

Peter Thiel, who also advises Y Combinator put 2.5 billion into REQ over the weekend.

[Anonymous No.5810105]

>>5810005
So I just hodl now? I went all in on yesterday's dip

[Anonymous No.5810119]

>>5810005
Why the other way around? It has been said countless times already that in the same vein that REQ requires LINK to function countless other projects and situations will require LINK to function. Why do you think REQ has more potential despite having 100 times less use cases?

[Anonymous No.5810190]

>>5809956
Have you watched him speak?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrlL5v78FtA

[Anonymous No.5810384]

>>5809956
It's the only trustless decentralized Oracle network compatible with all platforms, yes.

[Anonymous No.5810479]

>>5810384
>>5809956

If you like chainlink you need to buy OracleChain (OCT). It's the chinese chainlink with a real team and real partnerships. It's the exact same technology.

[Anonymous No.5810543]

>>5809956
>how exactly do you expect one man with no formal education on software engineering to pull this off?
Just sell all your Link already.

[Anonymous No.5810548]

Sold my Verge at 18 cents after the shitty wraith (good call) and now I have 10 000 LINKS holy shit
>1800% gains from verge
>+300% gains from LINK atm (bought around 14 cents)
>+5000 LINKS at current price
Holy shit can't wait for my linkies to moon. This will be epic. 10 dollars incoming

[Anonymous No.5810576]

[Anonymous No.5810641]

>>5810479
fuck off shill, nobody wants your bags

[Anonymous No.5810767]

>>5810479
Is this bazingacoin v2?

[Anonymous No.5810787]

>>5810479
>OracleChain is a smart contracts Oracle platform for the EOS platform, providing a market-enforced system for accurate data feeds to power decentralized prediction markets and any other EOS dapps which require oracle services into a smart contract.

Meanwhile, ChainLink will work for any blockchain.

[Anonymous No.5810897]

>>5810787

Chainlink will run on eth initially then it's "possible" it may run on other blockchains years in the future *if* developers write adaptors for it, which is a big if considering sergey has done literally nothing to get the word out about it or encourage people to work on it.

[Anonymous No.5810904]

>>5810479
Stop posting this coin it's fucking obnoxious

[Anonymous No.5810958]

>>5810897
It's clear you own Link just quit FUDing it pls or at least come up with some new material

[Anonymous No.5810970]

Someone shill me QSP. Should I diversify my link and req shares into qsp so I have 1/3 of each?

[Anonymous No.5810995]

>>5810904
bahahahaaha fucking annoying LINK shills are getting mad. I'm going to shill OracleChain 30 times per day just like u

[Anonymous No.5811111]

>>5810897
He has stated that adaptors can be easily ported. Read here https://medium.com/@sergeynazarov/chainlink-an-overview-and-our-focus-14f03335b803

[Anonymous No.5811120]

>>5810897

He stated in the announcement he's hiring a marketing director with 3-5 years experience launching new products.

He believes in specialization

[Anonymous No.5811185]

>>5810897
>Chainlink will run on eth initially
The Ruby version already works with BTC, ETH, and Hyperledger, you mong.
And Chainlink will work with any blockchain, DLT, or similar platform, so long as adapters are developed.

[Anonymous No.5811242]

>>5810995
I don't shill shit I call out ppl like you when they post bs over and over

[Anonymous No.5811328]

>>5811120

you do realize you can't just hire a marketing director and expect to be successful right? Do you really think one marketing director can do graphic design, copywriting, b2b, social media, SEO, etc. etc. etc. lol sergey has no idea what he's doing.

[Anonymous No.5811349]

>>5810479
Literal who coin

[Anonymous No.5811356]

Guys, I will buy link.

[Anonymous No.5811358]

>>5811328
>Do you really think one marketing director can do graphic design, copywriting, b2b, social media, SEO, etc. etc. etc
Wait, who thinks this?

[Anonymous No.5811368]

>>5809956
Just... read the fucking whitepaper and watch the 2 or 3 talks Sergey's held, what the fuck dude. 10k and you don't even know how grand in scale this shit is. You don't even know they've been actively hiring for months and have been rewriting their code and that the main net is scheduled for the first half of this year in addition to the BTC superconference in february, just... wtf man. I'm poor and only have 1k link and I'm more mentally invested in this shit than you, get a grip friend

[Anonymous No.5811442]

>>5811328
No, but literally any news at this point from a "professional" is more than enough to boost this coin. It has more going for it than most top 100's

[Anonymous No.5811489]

>>5811368
Not to mention SXSW.
The normie awareness of Link after that conference will send us straight to Saturn.

[Anonymous No.5811562]

>>5811489
Shit he’s presenting at south by?

Gonna buy more tonight

[Anonymous No.5811577]

>>5811356
Don't regret it.

[Anonymous No.5811593]

>>5811358

Sergey, he only hired one marketing director. He refuses to hire a whole team.

[Anonymous No.5811612]

>>5807819
That's a convenient place to cut that image off. They then go on to list a couple of totally different alternative solutions which don't involve Chainlink.

I am fucking waist deep in LINK and thigh deep in REQ, but no need to make shit up. REQ has not yet committed to LINK. LINK still has a lot going for it, and doesn't need REQ to succeed. And REQ may commit eventually. We'll see.

[Anonymous No.5811616]

>>5811593
Source?

[Anonymous No.5811667]

>>5811562
With the CEO of DocuSign I believe.
Yea DocuSign. 2018 will bring about legislation to make SmartContracts legally binding and Link with DocuSign will automate tons of legal processes eliminating a lot of need for lawyers. Ripple only does banking. Link does everything.

[Anonymous No.5812150]

>>5810970
If you believe LINK and smart contracts have a future you should also believe QSP will succeed. QSP will be used to audit smart contracts and pretty much every smart contract that wants to be used seriously by anyone will need to be audited.

Personally I'm 100% in link with zero req or QSP because I believe LINK has a fuckton more potential to grow. But the other two are great investments, too, if you're uncomfortable with all inning one coin.

[Anonymous No.5812544]

55k LT. Colonel reporting in. Buildup in armaments is going well. Our REQrads have provided arms and ammunition from the West. We have mighty Zepplins amassing in an air armada ready to drop their payloads over the cripples. The LINK Marines trained hard; slogging through endless FUD through FUD-week. We are ready to storm Cripplecoast at daybreak.

- LT. Col. LINKface

[Anonymous No.5812571]

>>5807517
REQ moon in 3 weeks. Still have some time.

[Anonymous No.5812664]

>>5812150
I'd have to sell my req for qsp and req is a very good coin.

[Anonymous No.5812819]

>>5811328
No you fucking dipshit, a marketing director is the person you want to seek out external and hire internal resources to do all of that while providing high level direction and approval/disapproval.

Have you ever worked a day in your life?

Mud fud, 8/10 for making me reply

[Anonymous No.5812941]

>>5809817
Ripple is being pumped by some Goldman Sachs type assholes. Go look at the graph and tell me that doesn't look a bit too scheduled. It just keeps making those little steps. The bankers have infiltrated

[Anonymous No.5813117]

>>5811612
It literally says "Solution 1". I know they have many options, as any decent team would. But ChainLink is the preferred way, not only by them but many other projects relying on Smart Contracts.

[Anonymous No.5813269]

>>5813117
They probably know it's their best option. I wouldn't be surprised if they're also off put by lack of communication from SmartContract since they must have much bigger payments processors they are working with than Request and Request may feel threatened and so they won't 100% commit to saying they will use ChainLink

[Anonymous No.5813408]

>>5813269
>I wouldn't be surprised if they're also off put by lack of communication from SmartContract
If by lack of communication you refer to shilling and tweeting in order to calm the so called "investors", I think you don't see the scope of what they are aiming to achieve. ChainLink is having all the communication they need with the projects interested. Again, read here https://medium.com/@sergeynazarov/chainlink-an-overview-and-our-focus-14f03335b803

[Anonymous No.5813580]

>>5813408

I thought thats what >>5813269 trying to say too, but now that I read it his brainletism is a little more subtle

[Anonymous No.5813609]

>>5808904
>>5808001
>>5807945
what's so good about quantstamp? It's like it's trying to piggyback off LINK's memes

[Anonymous No.5813940]

>>5810190
Sergey knows his shit. Listening to daddy is like ASMR to me.

[Anonymous No.5814200]

>>5813609
Team is solid.
YCombinator backed.
What they do is auditing security of Smart contracts.
They do airdrops of any project they review for QSP token holders.

[Anonymous No.5814214]

>>5807571

[Anonymous No.5814292]

>>5807517
>http://www.truthcoin.info/blog/contracts-oracles-sidechains/
Interesting article on oracles and ethereum from 2 years ago if somebody hasn't realised chainlink's potential yet.

[Anonymous No.5814488]

>>5810005
Source on thiel? Huge if true

[Anonymous No.5814508]

Chainlink is a failed pump and dump shitcoin scam. Sad biz bought into this vaporware. I market sold my stack while waiting for the exit scam annoucement and subsequent dump. Linkies BTFO this poop token will never hit 70 cents ever again. Bleeding out back down to 25 cents after the massive red candles. It's ogre. Market sell all LINK, ASAP.

[Anonymous No.5814541]

the memes on this coin are intense. too bad the gains aren't

[Anonymous No.5814847]

>>5814541
>disregard low price here
This is you

[Anonymous No.5814897]

>>5812819
I was going to explain this to him but you covered my points.

[Anonymous No.5814988]

CAN THIS SHIT JUST HIT $1 ALREADY

[Anonymous No.5815030]

>>5814508
The best thing about Chainlink is that the fudders are bagholders themselves. I think that's why LINK has such good memes. Both for shilling and for FUD

t. Bagholder

[Anonymous No.5815122]

>>5814988
You won't even give it a couple of days to cool down. Relax you triple nigger, we don't want weak hands who plan on selling after holding only a week.