Link GIGA whales liquidated.

[Anonymous No.58038815]

These guys were trying to front run history. Had to execute them before moving up. Can't allow new billionaires to be made.

It's real.

[Anonymous No.58038825]

>>58038815
Just stop doing calls and puts retards

[Anonymous No.58038831]

>>58038815
>Imagine buying vc shitcoins!

[Anonymous No.58038843]

>>58038815
I wonder what its like to get that rekt. must be horrific.

[Anonymous No.58038851]

F
also, what homepage is that?

[Anonymous No.58038867]

>>58038815
they only got liqd so hard because Linkies are notoriously bad traders

[Anonymous No.58038880]

>>58038825
They will never listen kek. When XRP moons I'm not sharing. Too many scammers in this world. Each one of those liquidations might as well be happening to a telemarketer pajeet. Too many greedy scumbags out there

[Anonymous No.58038884]

>>58038843
coinglass liquidations

[Anonymous No.58038887]

>>58038851
https://www.coinglass.com/LiquidationData

[Anonymous No.58038971]

>LINK longs liquidated
>this is bullish!
>LINK shorts liquidated
>this is bullish!
>price = eternal bleeding
the absolute state of unhinged desperate baggies

[Anonymous No.58038991]

>>58038971
No, it was very much targeted.
Around 10-15% of whales were liquidated

[Anonymous No.58039047]

>>58038991
whats this FUCKING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS SHIT???

[Anonymous No.58039056]

>>58038991
wanna see something insane? the 4 major liquidations have been removed from the server, hiding whats going on.

[Anonymous No.58039062]

>>58039047
BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS POOLS CLOSED LPL SEETHE

[Anonymous No.58039067]

>>58039056
wait, what happened?

[Anonymous No.58039083]

>>58039067
I posted the original screenshot showing the massive liquidations, and just checked to see if theres been anymore.
But the data points of the liquidations i screenshotted initially, have been entirely removed from the site.

They're hiding links liquidations


kodak

[Anonymous No.58039100]

>>58039083
yeah i saw it as well was looking myself but what happened with it just vanishing i mean

[Anonymous No.58039116]

>>58039100
the liq's were about 4 hours, 12 hours and 16 hours ago so they should still be tracked until 24h passes.

Someone saw this post and then hid the data

[Anonymous No.58039120]

>>58039083
Still on their telegram lmao

[Anonymous No.58039131]

>>58038815
>>58037909

>100% of LP burned then more added as locked liquidity for a year by the community

>perfect score on rugcheck, 0% risk analysis

>completely quietly growing organic community without influencers or KOLs to dump on you. Very few jeets, very high conviction.

>every dip that has ever occurred gets scooped up immediately


>character and origin story hasn’t even been released yet

https://dexscreener.com/solana/b2udzidkt5dvdbzyzslwb9csfguzlduqyd9ggcur1w6s

Tele: DBUYbotcommunity

[Anonymous No.58039192]

>>58038815
this is why I will always hold a bag of link

[Anonymous No.58039244]

so this is the new way for advocates to dangle a carrot for the next week or two

[Anonymous No.58039249]

>>58039120
thanks for this data point

This thread really should be shown to the larger crypto community, if people could blatantly see the manipulation maybe we'd get somewhere. This is pretty blatant

[Anonymous No.58039255]

>>58039244
Yes whenever the market moves they find a reason to pin it on LINK and it actually works on the schizo retards here. the chainlink organization itself spreads these tales. A criminal investigation is unironically warranted

[Anonymous No.58039256]

>>58039249
>we
Nice try Bulgarian but we have IDs here.

[Anonymous No.58039261]

>>58038815
good I hate all leverage fuckers

[Anonymous No.58039267]

>>58039255
you'll notice the same with XRP .
everything revolves around XRP to them. bitcoin -10%? must be down to XRP getting too close to becoming the world's currency at $18000
etc.etc.

theres a sizeable market of terminally online flat earther GME apes who are eager to diamond hand anything that feeds them a schizo narrative.

[Anonymous No.58039304]

>>58038815
this was my last chance, now i need to wait for LRDS to come out

[Anonymous No.58039335]

uhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[Anonymous No.58039342]

lol why is it gone? it's driving the skitzos insane but why is the data gone from the website? I even saw it when opening OPs thread when it was new and searching for the website

[Anonymous No.58039353]

https://www.coinglass.com/currencies/LINK

Its still showing 68Mill liquidated if you dive further into their website. This will probably be removed after this is posted too.

So just removed from the front page to hide whats going on.

[Anonymous No.58039356]

>>58039342
>it's driving the skitzos insane
schizo is someone seeing something that isn't there, are you saying you are schizophrenic since you saw it too?

[Anonymous No.58039366]

>>58038815
Can you tell if there are many more waiting to be liquidated, or are they all done?

[Anonymous No.58039379]

>>58039056
can you please provide links to this stuff as well as posting screenshots? thanks

[Anonymous No.58039391]

>>58039356
nah i for sure saw it

[Anonymous No.58039436]

>>58039120
absolutely unbelievable levels of suppression
but still we liq'ed this much compared to the past years average interest and we are still at the bottom of the recent range
thats pretty bullish actually, also means they hunted this whales stops exactly lol

>>58038815
still dont understand how people still use leverage to this degree, if a move to the bottom of the current fairly new range gets you liq'ed you deserve it entirely
how come these gambler degens still have money left to do this
and i wonder how they dont rope when they see what they could have had if they only spot bought in the next years

[Anonymous No.58039458]

>>58039120
>>58039056
>>58038991
>>58038815
bullish for non-degenerate holders
seems like CCIP is really around the corner
I mean this liquidations plus the huge amount of fudding

[Anonymous No.58039469]

Strange how it was on bitmex, a dying exchange with shrinking volume and almost none outside BTC contracts now.

On bitmex, it shows 42mm 24 hour volume on the LINKUSD perp, but if you look at the chart its only showing 2mm.

So strange. Maybe a glitch? Would have thought massive liquidation on a contract with very low volume would have moved it violently

[Anonymous No.58039481]

>>58039469
i will say this
every time there was a value spike on the CCIP dashboard from Eric Wallach, it was scrubbed as an error.
the new ccip dashboard has an "error" as well

Could it be all these data points were not glitches?

[Anonymous No.58039487]

>>58038815
if you play with derivatives, you're at the mercy of 'market forces' and will eventually get burned.

[Anonymous No.58039517]

>>58039481
Im just not so sure if this event really happened. Bitmex prices for link would be moving out of sync unless the orders were stuck on the books till cleared(which would take weeks with their average volume).
Its possible they manually intervened to take that order/liquidation OTC for settlement though.

[Anonymous No.58039519]

>>58039469
Honestly, I would more think it was a mistake on bitmex's site. It would certainly be a weird coincidence with it having this problem with exactly chainlink.
Bitmex does have a sizeable futures/derivatives trading volume, its spot volume is laughably low at under 500k USD but it has over $1b USD in perpetuals per day

[Anonymous No.58039639]

>>58039469
>Maybe a glitch
in isolation sure you could assume that, but its always with link that these glitches happen
why is that so what about this token attracts the glitches on all the crypto things from exchanges to publications to something so fucking simply as the rank number on coingecko
always with link

[Anonymous No.58039670]

>>58038815
They probably longed because Link was about to break through the $22 resistance.
But then Bitcoin jumped off a cliff just to stop that from happening.

These people learned a valuable lesson about Link suppression that day.

[Anonymous No.58039688]

>>58038815

I've repeated told people that long LINK on leverage is a fool's errand on CEXes. They will stop hunt you. I swear they are paid to do so even beyond just the profits they make counter trading their customers. Like someone is incentivizing them further to do so even.

Its sad because LINK is going to do incredibly well over the coming months too.

[Anonymous No.58039695]

>>58039688
price prediction?

[Anonymous No.58039728]

>>58039083
>>58039083

WTF. OP there are no such thing as coincidences. They definitely are hiding something. And as God and the universe always provides you were given a sign when you captured their schemes and corruption as a brief moment in time. A kodak moment as it were.

Reality truly is much more interesting and stranger than fiction.

What would be the purpose to downplay the amount of liqs in your opinion?

[Anonymous No.58039735]

>>58039116
>Someone saw this post and then hid the data

This happens all the time in many facets in regards to LINK. Many of my pro-LINK threads have just been outright deleted and pruned by mods all on topic and above board.

[Anonymous No.58039785]

>>58039695
>>58039695

UP but that is the mid to longer term time. In the short term it will continue to be volatile as fuck and destroy lives as it eventually breaks out and trends upward.

[Anonymous No.58039790]

>>58039728
We all know 90mill is whatever in the grand scheme of things, but deleting the data points downplays the facts that there are massive players in chainlink..
more Liqs than Eth which has 40x the marketcap,
2x as many liqs than solana which has 8x the marketcap,
.5x as many liqs as BTC, which is 120x the marketcap.

Many of the major link twitter shills all jumping board to dog coins, ccip revenue fud, on top of the massive fud, now on top of liquidation data being hidden from the public. They want you to give up on the vision when CCIP is potentially GA before the 30th and insane price action begins.

and the kodak captcha was nice timing

[Anonymous No.58039825]

>>58039790

Yes clearing out the retail froth before it starts taking off would make sense.

[Anonymous No.58039861]

>>58039249
no you stupid nigger we fud link to keep newfags away

[Anonymous No.58039863]

>>58039639

>dunkirk wasn't a loss and a retreat
>dunkirk was a tactical victory preserving the integrity of the BEF.

when you think marketing and pr is just releasing a timed press release.

these glitches and threads and tweets about liquidations are marketing.

[Anonymous No.58039880]

>>58039790
literally 2 more weeks

[Anonymous No.58039899]

>>58038815
imagine owning chainlink in 2024

[Anonymous No.58039913]

>>58039469
You didnt even have to be smart to do this lol. That faggot ariharbi or whatever kept posting about link longs in all caps on twitter. It was a matter of time

[Anonymous No.58039930]

>>58039785
>proejct has been around seven years
>mid to long term
Are you fucking stupid?

[Anonymous No.58040159]

>>58039517
>Its possible they manually intervened to take that order/liquidation OTC for settlement though.
bitmex may have been approached by an entity who offered payment if they could nuke those longs and buy their liquidations. That could explain why they are apparently covering their tracks

[Anonymous No.58040202]

Why is it that Chainlink out of all cryptos is the only one with these "errors/mistakes"?

[Anonymous No.58040218]

>>58040159
>bitmex may have been approached by an entity who offered payment if they could nuke those longs and buy their liquidations. That could explain why they are apparently covering their tracks
are you retarded? ari harbi on tweet has been caps lock tweeting about how link longs have been up for the past two weeks. It was a matter of time before the market moved to liquidated the longs.

[Anonymous No.58040239]

>>58039083
this is a good catch, this is next level suppression....talk about hiding link in plain sight so no one will get rich off it

[Anonymous No.58040302]

>>58038815
What ever happened to that one guy who shorted something like $5m worth of Link at $12?

[Anonymous No.58040326]

>>58040218
stfu about your fucking twitter and go jerk off to abi dabi you absolute psycho

[Anonymous No.58040329]

>>58039056
>its real
are you fucking shitting me
wtf

[Anonymous No.58040337]

>>58040239
why would hiding liquidated longs mean something? Not fudding, i just don't really what's useful about the information to bother hiding it

[Anonymous No.58040358]

LOOK AT ALL THE LINK KEKS IN THIS THREAD

[Anonymous No.58040363]

>>58040337
>We all know 90mill is whatever in the grand scheme of things, but deleting the data points downplays the facts that there are massive players in chainlink..
more Liqs than Eth which has 40x the >marketcap,
>2x as many liqs than solana which has 8x the marketcap,
>.5x as many liqs as BTC, which is 120x the marketcap.

[Anonymous No.58040391]

>>58039861
Do you also live miserable life to keep friends away?

[Anonymous No.58040396]

>>58038815
kek good. everybody using leverage in any capacity should be liquidated at minimum. preferably liquidated IRL too

[Anonymous No.58040399]

>>58040363
Pretty fucked up.

[Anonymous No.58040436]

>>58040363
gotcha, thanks.

[Anonymous No.58040444]

>>58040363
oh you said that before and i missed it duh

[Anonymous No.58040473]

Really looks like a mistake at BitMex to be honest. In all these years, big LINK liquidations never took place on that platform. The volume just doesn't match.

[Anonymous No.58040534]

>>58039930

Are you? Based on the longer time frame charts from this point its going up in the mid to long term. The accumulation period is nearing its end on the LINK/BTC pair. Next comes the "Mark up" phase, and then distribution.

Projects with real longevity go through these cycles over and over. Just as ETH and BTC have.

[Anonymous No.58040654]

>>58040218
anon, the people who are in the business of liquidating leverage positions don't rely on some twitter account that likely belongs to (you). They have direct access to the exchanges books.
Furthermore, you're missing the entire point of my post, which is a theory as to why a large liquidation on a relatively small exchange didn't result in the link price dumping a bunch compared to the broad market price.

[Anonymous No.58040705]

>>58040473
It just doesn't make a lot of sense that they randomly show a bunch of huge link liquidations tho. That's kind of like when atheists say that an organism just randomly developed eyeballs through the magic of evolution. But why would there be fughueg link longs on bitmex in the first place? The whole situation is very fishy. This could be the tip of an iceberg.

[Anonymous No.58040735]

>morons unironically wasting hours talking about a faulty api
biz has fallen

[Anonymous No.58040887]

>>58040705
Remember when people thought Chainlink oracles misreported the price for Gold a few years back, but it turned out the developer using Chainlink switched up Au and Ag while implementing the oracles? This is almost certainly a similar situation.

We have an old leverage trading platform that is known for handling big leveraged BTC bets but it has been on the decline for a few years and sees little altcoin volume. We know that big LINK liquidations mostly take place on DeFi platforms.

Suddenly LINK liquidation volume is 50% that of BTC and bigger than ETH, or that of all other altcoins (excluding ETH) combined. 95% of those liquidations took place on the previously mentioned platform, which is a first in almost 7 years of LINK trading. 40 minutes later the anomaly has been scrubbed from the charts.

This is a typical api fault like >>58040735 points out. If not, someone fat fingered a manual input. Both satisfy Occam's Razor.

[Anonymous No.58040907]

>>58040735
thats my assumption too.
Bitmex doesnt even get $42 million in volume on LINK/USD perp a month. i dont see how these positions could possibly have been opened since above $18. it makes no sense at all.
It must just be a faulty API or something.

[Anonymous No.58041149]

>>58038971
best post in this thread

[Anonymous No.58041204]

>>58039790
If the figures are real and were subsequently pulled, it would makes sense to see followup damage limitation like >>58040473 and >>58040887

[Anonymous No.58041243]

>>58039639
>WHY DOES CHAINLINK KEEP GETTING HACKED
Maybe chainlink isn't that good?

[Anonymous No.58041316]

>>58041243
It's never Chainlink that gets hacked or glitches, it's coinmarketcap, coingecko, the dune dashboards, etc.

[Anonymous No.58041331]

>>58039267
I hold XRP but unfortunately so do fucking retarded noisy cunt arses that make the rest of us look bad.
They are the flat earthers of the conspiracy world.

[Anonymous No.58041349]

>>58039255
>>58039267
You are retarded, and people laugh at you irl wherever you go.

[Anonymous No.58041362]

>>58041204
correct
There were in fact several big Link liquidations on bitmex in the last year
37m, 17m, 15m, 20m.

90m is definitely the largest of its kind, but it makes sense that giga whales would try to front run CCIP with such large positions.

[Anonymous No.58041419]

>>58041362
proofs?

[Anonymous No.58041420]

>>58041243
Are you fucking retarded?

[Anonymous No.58041437]

>>58039056
Holy fucking shit dude bump this thread

[Anonymous No.58041474]

>>58041419
verify here for now
https://www.coinglass.com/currencies/LINK

[Anonymous No.58041490]

>>58041362
Also; look at the way this post is laid out >>58040887
It's impeccable. Everything about it. The structuring, the neatly arranged paragraphs, the Reddit spacing. It's almost too good. I'm not saying this is proof of anything but if it were damage limitation from outside of here, we might expect it to be of this format.
Interesting, and i'm on the fence. Leaning towards the conspiracy version of events, though

[Anonymous No.58041519]

So what is the TLDR, is link's price going up or not?

[Anonymous No.58041578]

>>58041490
>It's impeccable. Everything about it. The structuring, the neatly arranged paragraphs, the Reddit spacing.
Kek thanks but paragraphs are not Reddit spacing.

[Anonymous No.58041640]

>>58040302
Afair he gets liq'd at around $24 now so he's still on the hook

[Anonymous No.58041667]

>>58041578
>kek
Now he's trying to be one of us. I've tumbled his game. If you're not one of them, post sharpie in pooper

[Anonymous No.58041686]

I think this just reflects that people were certain link was just trailing and would catch up.

Then they got extra fucked when it just plummeted.

[Anonymous No.58041689]

Why the FUCK would you long Link with leverage? It ALWAYS dumps after a pump because bitcoin nukes it. How can you be a trader and try seriously go "yeah this time its gonna be different"? I just dont get that.

[Anonymous No.58041701]

>>58041686
>people were certain link was just trailing
Link was pumping against the market just before Bitcoin shit itself.

[Anonymous No.58041722]

>>58041667
Not at that phase in the bull run yet friend.

[Anonymous No.58041726]

>>58041667
shills are too obviously shills these days

[Anonymous No.58041761]

>>58041701
true,
however link was at the same price it had been at a month before while bitcoin, solana, avax and all the rest of the market had been pumping for a month.

[Anonymous No.58041766]

>>58041726
>go against unlikely LINK shill narrative
>r-reddit! shill!
Alright then advocate.

[Anonymous No.58041787]

>>58041761
>however link was at the same price it had been at a month before while bitcoin, solana, avax and all the rest of the market had been pumping for a month.
Because Bitcoin dumps every time Link tries to pump.

This latest Bitcoin dump was because Link was about to break out of the $22 resistance.

[Anonymous No.58041791]

>>58041701
After months of pure dump and being way behind. So obviously people thought it was a safe long. Hence more long volume and anal rape when the market tanked.

[Anonymous No.58041800]

>>58041791
>After months of being way behind
see >>58041787

[Anonymous No.58041806]

>>58041701
I’m starting to lend more credibility to the sergey behind the price suppression insider larp

[Anonymous No.58041830]

>>58041806
>hurrr Sergey is the one dumping bitcoin

[Anonymous No.58041844]

>>58041204
IF the figures are real and WERE subsequently pulled then it WOULD make sense...

>if, were, would.
you're right. IF they WERE it WOULD.

or the figures are just wrong.
that's why you're a shill.
you've developed an idea that makes it seem like link is on the cusp of, all the while being a victim of, and soon to be, almost, probably, possibly...

or like with the dune dashboard the figures are just wrong.
and why are the always wrong? because it's a ruse to make you think it's about to happen while the dumpage continues.

link is the singular best bet in crypto.
but please stop with the carrot dangling and advocating.

[Anonymous No.58041860]

>>58041806
it makes perfect sense if we think about that, he would need a stable price for the token
>inb4 he hold multiple millions to give them to institutions for free OTC

[Anonymous No.58041864]

>>58039056

[Anonymous No.58041866]

>>58041787
Link literally had months of btc going up only or consolidating to follow along. Claiming bad price action because btc dumped is just lazy.

[Anonymous No.58041869]

>>58041787
But bitcoin doesn't dump everytime link tries to pump. That's just factually inaccurate.
Go look at a chart. See the days when link pumps. Plenty of those days bitcoin pumps too.

If you want to say that sometimes when link pumps then bitcoin dumps, you'd be right.
But that isn't the same as everytime link pumps bitcoin dumps.

[Anonymous No.58041909]

>>58039056
>removed from server
LOOOOOL AHAHAHHA TAKE YOUR MEDS

[Anonymous No.58041920]

>>58041909
selam adam
I hope you are fasting habibi

[Anonymous No.58041923]

>>58041866
>Link literally had months of btc going up only or consolidating to follow along
Anon, Bitcoin was LITERALLY at ATH two days ago. And it still dumped the very second Link tried to break out.
It does not matter if Bitcoin is in the middle of a pump or whatever, it will dump when Link pumps.

>>58041869
>Go look at a chart. See the days when link pumps. Plenty of those days bitcoin pumps too.
After MONTHS of Bitcoin dumping each time Link threatened to cross $9, Bitcoin finally neglected to suppress Link at that $9 level back in October.
And what happened? Link broke out ahead of the entire market.

But it seems Link is simply not allowed to pump beyond $20.

[Anonymous No.58041944]

>>58041909

[Anonymous No.58041949]

>>58041844
>advocating
i said here >>58041490 that i was on the fence about it. Are you the conversation police? Go fuck yourself, Mr fuddy

[Anonymous No.58041952]

>>58039353
It was probably just another error like the ccip revenue lmao

[Anonymous No.58041960]

>>58041923
so regardless of the billions of inflows from etfs, it's all manipulated in order to suppress link?
do you understand how deluded that is? it's xrp tier. of course it is possible, but it is very unlikely.

does sergey have btc to dump? possibly, i have no idea. i doubt you do either.

do you know what is more likely AND more reasonable ? that link is dumped into btc, not btc dumped for link.

[Anonymous No.58041979]

>>58041960
>so regardless of the billions of inflows from etfs, it's all manipulated in order to suppress link?
Either that or it's a coincidence.
A coincidence that people can predict.

>that link is dumped into btc
Then Link should be dumping before BTC.
Also, how does selling Link for BTC make BTC dump?

[Anonymous No.58042026]

>>58041830
If you deny that bitcoin dumps on link uptrends you’re a newfag
And I’m not someone who believed it for a long time

[Anonymous No.58042037]

>>58042026
Yes. But thinking it's Sergey is just dumb.

[Anonymous No.58042063]

Funny that such an innocuous conversation should draw such visceral responses. This is a huge red flag for me and i'm now more convinced than i was earlier that these longs were pulled off the site.
Lady doth protest too hard, and all that. These guys have no idea what reverse psychology is. Works against them every time.
Yup, looks like GA in next couple weeks followed by sharp prise rise. Nice.

[Anonymous No.58042073]

>>58042037
It doesn’t mean Sergey is sitting on his keyboard mashing the sell button
But it’s possible he is instructing those involved to participate in these acts

[Anonymous No.58042075]

>>58042063
*price rise*

[Anonymous No.58042089]

>>58041979
btc dumps because that's crypto.
btc used to dump way before link was ever a thing.
it's volatile. less volatile than before but always been so.
had nothing to do with link when link was 7 bucks and had nothing to do with link when it was one dollar, it just goes up, goes up, retraces, goes up, retraces, goes up loads, dumps, goes up, retraces, dumps, goes up. always has.
but advocates have created this victimhood conspiracy narrative that suits the personalities who buy link to make them think its all about their coin.

[Anonymous No.58042103]

>>58042089
The data just flew over your head

[Anonymous No.58042107]

>>58042063
2 more weeks huh

[Anonymous No.58042151]

>>58042103
you wouldn't want to understand crypto marketing techniques if your investment depended on it.
i get it.
i'm holding link too.
and what you're saying is possible. yet quite unreasonable and unlikely and there is a far more likely, reasonable and appropriate explanation for it which i've already given.
2 more weeks.

[Anonymous No.58042170]

>>58042089
People are predicting it happening. Nearly every time Link pumps, Bitcoin will dump. Especially at resistance.
And not only that, but you can even draw lines that the suppression is targeting; it used to be $9 and now it's $22.

Of course it could still be a coincidence, but it would be statistically anomalous to the point of implausibility.

[Anonymous No.58042171]

>>58042089
>>58042151
ok nigger loser

[Anonymous No.58042202]

>>58042171
Fucking look at this.
There's a reason people can predict this shit, it's the most obvious pattern since sunrise-sunset.

[Anonymous No.58042216]

>>58042063
Been hearing this for years tho…the chart

[Anonymous No.58042232]

>>58042170
your logic is when link pumps btc dumps.
>most times

because sometimes it doesn't.
sometimes link pumps and btc DOESN'T dump.


used to be $9, various figures in between, and now it's $22. so if the resistance lines keep changing WHILE BITCOIN IS GOING UP, then they aren't closely correlated beyond a few hours / a day or two at most.
and in that time, on a wider scale, btc has PUMPED from roughly 20 to 72k.
it pumped.
and link pumped. but not as much.
and somedays when link pumped, btc dumped.
often link pumped and btc didnt dump.
behaving just like an alt does.

is their price suppression? of course. this is crypto we are talking about. it's manipulated. but that's not the same as saying the market dumps in order to suppress link. that's a huge reach that is not substantiated by the facts, you've just chosen particular dates on the charts to justify a point while ignoring other days when both link and btc were pumping.

[Anonymous No.58042233]

>>58042170
Why is link so weak and cucked tho

My other alts can moon whenever

[Anonymous No.58042242]

>>58042216
Don't invest then. Simple. Why you trying to convince me? I know what i'm holding and you can try as hard as you like but you'll never, ever get me to part with any of it. Why spend your time on it if you think it's shit?

[Anonymous No.58042250]

>>58042232
Everything you said is right but you’re trying to reason with a cult

[Anonymous No.58042272]

>>58042202
look, go look at the 1st of February. Link pumped like $1.80 and reached a new range.
Btc didn't dump.

or go look at the 27th of December. Link pumped.
Btc didn't dump.

[Anonymous No.58042274]

>>58042232
The suppression level changes, yes.
The point isn't to keep Link at a certain price forever, the point is to sap all momentum, to flatten its trend.

> that link is dumped into btc
Anon, how long is this: >>58042171

>>58042233
>My other alts can moon whenever
So can mine. Because Bitcoin doesn't dump whenever they move.

[Anonymous No.58042284]

>>58042242
Exhibit a - the cult member keeps trying to build up this strawman boogeyman

It’s an age old politician strategy - tell the people they’re under attack then you can convince them to believe anything

[Anonymous No.58042292]

>>58042272
Bitcoin dumped every time Link reached $9.

[Anonymous No.58042304]

>>58042274
Nah they still moon despite what btc does (they arent limp/weak like cucked link)

[Anonymous No.58042311]

>>58042304
>Nah they still moon despite what btc does
Nothing pumps while BTC dumps.

[Anonymous No.58042319]

>>58042284
>talks a load of old shite and avoids a direct question
'twas ever thus

[Anonymous No.58042322]

>>58042232
>they aren't closely correlated beyond a few hours / a day or two at most.

How long is this >>58042171

[Anonymous No.58042327]

>>58042292
it didn't though.
it dumped SOME of the times link reached $9.

[Anonymous No.58042330]

>>58042304
>>58042284
>cuck

[Anonymous No.58042340]

>>58042322
you're quite literally ignoring the days when link pumped AND btc didn't dump.

[Anonymous No.58042346]

>>58042327
you're a real weirdo do you know that? you're denying reality

[Anonymous No.58042350]

>>58042171
to be entirely fair the first three had nothing to do with link
that was cefi liquidation unavoidable, the second was the whole market also the s&p tipping over and the third was ftx blowing up
its almost as if someone knew that these shitfests were gonna happen and bought a lot of link in advanced in the knowledge that it would not move price up so accumulation could continue
recent moves however are entirely devoid of market correlation action and seem entirely timed to suppress link and only link

also on another note did anyone notice that this thread is missing the unhinged fudders
there is a distinct lack of cuckposting, lpl chuddie kid pool all caps poster and the guy who keeps posting price updates of today and the price of 4 years ago
why would that be? might be that every post brings visibility to ops pics and they dont want that
we will know for sure if the jannies kill this thread as the last salvage of suppression, so keep a link to the archives ready that we can all repost ops images

[Anonymous No.58042394]

>>58042327
>>58042340
show me exactly where Link hit $9 and Bitcoin didn't dump

[Anonymous No.58042412]

>>58042340
Surely you can point them out. LINK would be higher during that timeframe if it didn't get dumped at around 9.

[Anonymous No.58042435]

>don’t believe your eyes, believe me instead!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nEPWUFgfvk

[Anonymous No.58042439]

>>58041844
>and why are the always wrong? because it's a ruse to make you think it's about to happen while the dumpage continues.
Yeah, dude. Its far more likely that some random Link fudder colluded with an exchange to create fake numbers to get Linkies to hold on a little bit longer than it is that actual deep pockets have interest in novel tech, the only tech, that can legitimize crypto. (You basically admitted as much at the end)
Lmao, easily the most schizo post itt.

[Anonymous No.58042464]

>>58042350
>to be entirely fair the first three had nothing to do with link
So over the course of 6 months (just for the first three times) the entire market happens to shit itself every single time Link hits $9?
With a bunch more such identical instances during the following 12 months?
Do you have any idea how statistically implausible this is?

I mean technically it could all be a coincidence, but if so then this entire case should be studied by statisticians for centuries to come.

[Anonymous No.58042466]

>>58042330
Im not him but his twitter is fuckin hilarious and owns your mental space

[Anonymous No.58042489]

Remember when ccip was released in 2022

[Anonymous No.58042499]

>>58042466
Why are you so obsessed with this guy? Kinda unhealthy?

[Anonymous No.58042503]

>>58042394
October.
when link broke out of its range.

sure you will say but the 4 previous times link touched $9 btc dumped, but then you'd have to be dismissive of the 5th data point. so, put simply, your choosing the range that suits you.

and then of course you will follow it up and say 'but that's when link broke out of its range so it doesn't count.'

but what that means is that when it suits you, you use link at $9 as proof that btc dumps, but when it doesn't suit you, you abandon it and say 'but that time was different'.

well, ok, if we are to use caveats, what about using grander macro events like this poster has >>58042350

i guess those don't count either. it only counts when it suits the narrative.

anon, listen, i've got loads of link and want to see it reach the moon. but, assuming you aren't a shill just as you are assuming i'm not fudding, you have to recognise that link is simply underperforming to how we think it should because it gets dumped and suppressed.
btc dumping isn't needed for that to happen. you just suppress the buying pressure by releasing plenty more link either through centralised exchanges or programs like build etc.
there's no grand conspiracy. it just gets dumped.
and we all knew it would get dumped, so we kind of have to accept it being dumped until there's no more to dump and hope it gets adopted by then.

[Anonymous No.58042514]

>>58042089
With each post I read
>>58042151
You seem increasingly stupider than I preciously thought. You must be very, very new to crypto. That or you struggle with simple concepts. Either way, you should probably keep most of your thoughts as internal, unless you have a humiliation fetish or something.

[Anonymous No.58042522]

thread has been derailed with same old info, but dont forget what happened here today.

90mill liquidated wiped from the books to hide the volume behind link, before CCIP GA.
if i see another massive liq i'll post,
have a good day frens

[Anonymous No.58042525]

>>58042439
so you say they are hiding the numbers and doing a cover up.
but that's not schizo.

you know that dex get's very little link action right?
and i'm schizo.
ok.

[Anonymous No.58042542]

>>58042466
>n-not him :((
His impotent seething at a token he supposedly owns is hilarious. Also his behaviour online vividly depicting his obsession to masturbation and being a massive gutter trash loser is hilarious.
You might not be him but you are as big a loser if you are cheerleading that tunisian mongrel.

[Anonymous No.58042551]

>>58042026
Btc dumps link because btc whales use link as a universal exit signal. They pump link to raise a flag signaling its time for them to collectively dump bitcoin for maximum effect

[Anonymous No.58042552]

>>58041923
yes exactly bitcoin was beyond ATH. So doesn't leave a lot of room for the idea bitcoin dumps to keep link down. It just keeps going up and link still staggers.

[Anonymous No.58042560]

>>58042503
>October.
>when link broke out of its range.
lol that proves Link was suppressed.
The ONE time in 18 months when Bitcoin didn't dump when Link hits $9, Link instantly boosts way past resistance.

You're honestly a very dim mind. No two ways about it.

[Anonymous No.58042584]

>>58040654
you're missing my point. If some twitter twat saw the trade someone way smarter did before him and took advantage of it.

[Anonymous No.58042595]

>>58042464
>Do you have any idea how statistically implausible this is?
i gave a counter explanation that might have happened
but arguing that outside actors blew up cefi and ftx on the exact day to stop link is farfetched
it is actually weirder that link pumped right before these inevitable events
but i fully concur that recent events are clearly btc dumping without any outside big force just the moment link pumps
they have gotten more direct in their approach after the october breakout
if ga is announced soon we will know for sure
of course half that problem could have been avoided if cll had proper investor communications and not the shitfest it currently is

[Anonymous No.58042598]

>>58042514
anon, appreciate your concern.
i might be stupid. perhaps i'm missing something obvious. but go read any xrp thread or the like. they have charts just like yours that conveniently exclude the bits that dont fit.
aside from my possible stupidity anon, i reckon we are more or less on the same side. we both just want link to do well and share it all with our families.
mines all already a pretty shade of green, and i'm never selling. have been in this crypto game for quite some time and remember the things before crypto like hyip schemes. this isn't the first girl i've kissed anon. maybe that's why i'm aware of how crypto marketing goes and why these numbers so often turn out to be wrong and dates are so often missed. link IS the best crypto shout out there besides btc.
but there is no grand plan to keep link down.
it's just standard price suppression through the dumping of the coin that we all knew would happen and signed up for.
link will probably get there, it will take time, but stop the conspiracies.

[Anonymous No.58042600]

It's been proven that link doesn't move any different to all the other altcoins.
When btc pumps link pumps, when btc dumps, link dumps. All the alts just follow bitcoin.

Of course if you focus entirely on link the whole time and ignore the rest of the market than it will appear to you that link is the main character.

[Anonymous No.58042605]

>>58042503
>accept it being dumped until there's no more to dump
I disagree. I think what's happening is it's being suppressed to allow big players to stack it for cheap. As soon as something big like Swift, DTCC, Six or whatever goes live or confirms 100% they're about to go live, there will be no way to suppress it so they won't even try.
I'm calling out your fud.
Also, picrel

[Anonymous No.58042607]

>>58039083
Why though? Whats the point?

[Anonymous No.58042620]

>>58042503
Anon, we are talking about something that alters the global financial system. Do you really think that the only trick in the book to suppress it is either dump or pump btc? We also had the Russian Ukrainian conflict occur as Link was primed to break put of its range lol. We had a mini S&P crash as pointed out. Why dont these significant events ever occur at times that are not significant to link in such a number that equals or even trumps the breakout suppression examples?
Yes, link leaves a range (eventually) is that so shocking? Being able to point out less than half a dozen examples as counterpoints to multiple dozens of suppression examples the rest of us have seen and lived through does not invalidate them at all.
This is now the second bullrun link spearheaded and it is shaping up to be the second where links bear starts while the rest of the bull goes on without it. We are being held at 20. Hitting 21 and even 22 briefly doesnt change that. If we do manage to hit 25 or 30 ypu can bet we will see plenty more examples of BTC and world events miraculously keeping link from breaking out of whatever new channel it establishes.

[Anonymous No.58042623]

>>58042560
look at your logic.

whenever it rains it's wednesday. you say it rains BECAUSE it is wednesday.

>look, on wednesday it rained.
>wednesday, it rained.
>wednesday it rained.
>wednesday it rained.

>i will conveniently ignore the other days it has rained even though there are other days it has rained.
>conclusion. it rains because it is wednesday.

>a wednesday comes and it doesn't rain.
>''but this wednesday doesn't count''

[Anonymous No.58042646]

I have never been more confident in my all in position of Chainlink cryptocurrency tokens than I am at this very moment.

[Anonymous No.58042649]

>>58042605
anon,
big players don't need to stack it for cheap.
they can just buy otc at prices pre-arranged.
you're applying retail mentality to the very institutions that can print money out of thin air.

>''but they need to justify spending 300 million instead of 500 million to shareholders''

anon. you're reaching.
have you ever seen any big institution yet justify any link holdings?

[Anonymous No.58042655]

>>58042620
now you know that's fud

[Anonymous No.58042705]

>>58042525
Im saying that seems a lot more likely when dealing with something that financial giants habe openly stated they have plans for rather than random exchanges and twitter personalities gaslighting link holders into not selling with fake numbers and events, yes.
>>58042598
If you want to change minds and sew doubt about suppression you shpuldbe able to find an equal number of examples where BTC *does not* dump at moments that arent pivotal to the link chart.
As far as XRP, do you have any of those charts or compilation videos depicting BTC dumping right as XRP is about to break out of months of established range? Ive only been in one or two threads and never seen those claims. Just weird breadcrumbs that don't make sense.
Im glad you hold link too, it would be weird to be arguing with someone who didn't have skin in the game. You seem like you have a defeatist attitude about the project though. Like you have a barrier up that prevents you from considering that what you have could indeed be special enough to warrant this odd treatment. And that it could never be so important that BTC would be reduced to a mere tool to control it in the interim. I appreciate that human touch to your post. Feels more like talking to a depressed anon than a paid fudder.

[Anonymous No.58042720]

>>58042607
>Why though? Whats the point?


>We all know 90mill is whatever in the grand scheme of things, but deleting the data points downplays the facts that there are massive players in chainlink..
more Liqs than Eth which has 40x the >marketcap,
>2x as many liqs than solana which has 8x the marketcap,
>.5x as many liqs as BTC, which is 120x the marketcap.

[Anonymous No.58042724]

>>58042705
Does not dump at moments that are pivotal to the link chart*
(Ignoring all my other mobile phone related typos)

[Anonymous No.58042743]

>>58042649
>have you ever seen any big institution yet justify any link holdings?
if i had i we wouldn't be having this debate. It's a stupid point to make.
>nasa never went to the moon
>you: don't be silly. have you ever seen them announce they never went to the moon?
sometimes i wonder about people

[Anonymous No.58042756]

>>58042649
>can just buy otc
do you think otc desks are magic market makers they just print up linkies whenever a client comes and asks for them
if otc desks want to sell link they will first need to convince us to sell it to them below market value and lol good luck at that

[Anonymous No.58042758]

>>58042724
To be even more specific, can you find, say, a half dozen examples where link breaks out of a range where btc doesnt either a) dump within 24 hours or b) doesnt pump to a new ATH or significant amount?
Fwiw i wouldnt think pumping from like 31k to 32k is significant *if* btc had already been ranging in that channel. Im talking about pumps that either take it to a new range considering the past few months or that represent a significant % of its total mcap. If you can find 6 examples like that during the past bear and or current bull Id think you have a solid argument against suppression.

[Anonymous No.58042769]

>>58042649
Also, even if they aren't stacking it, they're sure as hell trying to make sure the plebs don't stack it. that would turn them into power-plebs, and they don't want that

[Anonymous No.58042784]

kek baggies

[Anonymous No.58042872]

>>58042620
>DUUUUUUUUUDE THEY STARTED THE UKRAINE WAR TO SUPPRESS MY ERC20 SHITCOIN DUUUUDE!!!!!

[Anonymous No.58042902]

>>58038815
what the fuck

[Anonymous No.58042935]

>>58042902
>$38m
That's the largest liquidation ever?? Seems kind of small for the kind of money being thrown around in crypto.
I would expect atleast higher numbers in the hundreds of millions since some btc whales are billionaires

[Anonymous No.58042994]

>>58042902
Now imagine link goes to even $100, and he used only 6x leverage
1billion dollars profit

these kinds of whales are trying to front run history

[Anonymous No.58043043]

>>58042705
the way i see it is you're seeing it through the prism of holding link.

btc dumps.
it has always dumped.
it dumped before link was a thing.
it has dumped at times when link hasn't pumped.
it has dumped at times when link has pumped.
it has dumped at times when link has crabbed.
basically, bitcoin dumps.
and yes, it dumped 3 times when link touched $9, but it also didn't dump a different time when link touched $9.
and link touched $9 in the last cycle and it didn't dump. and yes the range link was moving in changed, and it will keep changing, that's how ranges work. but the essential point is btc dumps. it has always dumped. so to say it dumps because of link requires one to ignore so many data points.

it's like climate change people who say it's all because of humans.
and when you tell them the climate changed way before humans were around (in the industrial pollution sense) they insist this time it is because of humans.
and you politely say 'but the climate has changed plenty of times; .
warm ages ,cooler ages, ice ages, the climate changes. always has.
but no, they insist, this time it is BECAUSE of humans.
and of course, it could be because of humans, but considering it has always changed and we are humans it's all anthromorphism and of course they point to certain data and say look, it's because of humans.
that's what youre doing with link.
you're seeing something bigger than the thing through the prism of the thing.

let's just leave it anon.
whatever. i concede, you win. happy? everything in crypto revolves around link. btc dumps because of link. wish you the best anon, reckon we both want the same thing in the end and we're just both frustrated at link not pumping as we reckon it should.

[Anonymous No.58043082]

>>58042769
anon, they don't care. it's not that hard to make a million dollars or three. they don't care. there isn't some big plan to stop a few hundred / couple of thousands anons making anywhere from a few hundred thousand to 50 odd million after tax.

[Anonymous No.58043089]

>>58043043
Elaborate fud. Full marks for effort-posting. I wonder why he wants so much to convince us? Nothing to see here. Just a wall of oh-so-concerned demoralisation fud. We should be grateful to this lovely man

[Anonymous No.58043100]

I doubt the chainlink team want the price to skyrocket until staking v1 comes out and the link token is required as collateral for high value smart contracts. There's plenty of time to accumulate at least. But I doubt CCIP will have a significant impact on the price of the token. Everything hinges on staking.

[Anonymous No.58043129]

>>58043082
>they don't care, they don't care
how the fuck do you know? i'd say they definitely DO care. You have nothing to back up your claim, other than your bold assertion that large institutions don't care about money. On the contrary, it's ALL they care about.

[Anonymous No.58043163]

>>58043129
anon, plenty of anons here have already made it from link. and plenty haven't because they haven't sold.
but they could sell tomorrow anon. and nobody cares.

[Anonymous No.58043175]

>>58043043
How do I give this post reddit gold?

[Anonymous No.58043180]

>>58042994
My God.
Put me in the fucking Screencap lads

[Anonymous No.58043211]

>>58042620
Anon please respond,
So what do you think will happen?
The financial industry stalls out perpetually? When will (((they))) allow the new shift to commence?

[Anonymous No.58043218]

>>58043163
how does that refute my point about institutions wanting to make money? You just completely avoided that.
You're just fudding like mad. 24 posts of utter rubbish.
>anon, plenty of anons here have already made it from link
yes, you condescending tool. i should know. i'm one of them.

[Anonymous No.58043424]

>>58043218
didn't avoid anything on purpose.
just eating.

condescending? ok.

and as for your point about institutions wanting to make money, ok, i agree they want to make money. but if you think they care about buying the 'future infrastructure of everything' for $18 a link or $28 a link then you do you anon.
did you care about buying link when it was 60 cents so much compared to when it was 40 cents?
banks have orders of magnitude aum more than what it would cost to buy enough link otc to run several nodes at 18 or 23 dollars.

furthermore anon, the audits from governmental authorities and in house departments these banks go through and the number of people those checks involve almost guarantee that somewhere one of these huge purchases would have leaked and we'd know about it.
we get photos posted here from inside the goldman meeting.

in summary, you're telling me link is being suppressed so all of these huge financial institutions can save some cents on the dollar on the vital piece of future infrastructure for the internet of everything and at the same time while slurping up all of this link nobody at any of these banks or big 4 audit houses or clearing houses etc has leaked anything about it because i suppose nda's and that in order to do all of this the price of btc takes a dump, meaning what they hold in their right hand, so that these financial institutions can save a little money with what they buy with 1 little finger on their left hand?
i mean, yeah, it's plausible.
just like yeah climate change is caused by humans.

but you know what's more likely and reasonable anon?
that the financial institutions don't care if you make it or not, that the financial institutions aren't that bothered about saving say 1 or 4 million here or there (there's a lot of banks and clearing houses and deutsche telekom)

>everyone, everyone, come round, come roung, california beach front real estate going for 22 bucks a piece
>''no no, put it at $18, won't buy otherwise''

[Anonymous No.58043535]

>>58043100
>But I doubt CCIP will have a significant impact on the price of the token. Everything hinges on staking.
well the quadrillions flowing and the fees in link will definitely push the price upwards

[Anonymous No.58043546]

>>58043424
>can save some cents on the dollar
cents on the dollar
even with the suppression link did a 4x from the bottom
you call a 4x cents on the dollar, you cant be this retarded

[Anonymous No.58043555]

>>58042552
>It just keeps going up
Except when Link pumps.

>>58042623
Nice troll

[Anonymous No.58043665]

>>58043424

[Anonymous No.58043666]

>>58043424
>$18 a link or $28 a link
nice false dichotomy there. try
>$18 a link or $1500 a link
but hey, financial institutions don't care about that i'm an idiot for even thinking they might.
>i'm here to tell you about the inner workings of large institutions and how their decisions leak out like a sieve because they just do, okay?
uh-huh
>just like yeah climate change is caused by humans
it's quite ironic that you should use as an example something which is the reality of is so different to what we're presented with. Bad choice, anon.
I'm getting quite bored with you and your fallacious reasoning. i'll probably stop answering you shortly, but rest assured it's not because you've convince me of anything, only that your input is really quite boring

[Anonymous No.58043720]

>>58043089

What was false about what he said though. It was a very astute analogy. You need to be careful calling everything that upsets you “fud”. Read the boy who cried wolf

[Anonymous No.58043740]

>>58043082
Ive made this point 50+ times here and it always falls flat. Somehow linkies convinced themselves they are this dangerous force that can overthrew a government or something. It’s beyond cringe. There are 20 million millionaires in the US alone

[Anonymous No.58043776]

>>58043720
>It was a very astute analogy.
I agree it was an astute analogy. But it didn't do his argument any good. Quite the opposite. That's why i said it was ironic. Keep up.

[Anonymous No.58043783]

>>58043535
>quadrillions
Lmfao. Do yourself a favor and dont ever use that word in a real business setting.

[Anonymous No.58043820]

>>58043783
>dont ever use that word in a real business setting
tell that to Stephen Prosperi of the DTCC who said it onstage at Smartcon

[Anonymous No.58043840]

>>58043082
>>58043740
you faggots always avoid talking about the elephant in the room.
Anybody that can write and successfully deploy Smart Contracts has immense power. LINK (yes, the token) is needed for this if Chainlink becomes the de facto standard.
>linkies convinced themselves they are this dangerous force that can overthrew a government or something
no, but anybody controlling smart contracts becomes quasi untouchable by other power players (governments, mafias, w/e) since the player can program certain consequences if he is harmed or his conditions are not met.
Consider drones with AI automated targeting along with this technology and very quickly anybody that can use these Smart Contracts becomes another player that shouldn't be fucked with.

[Anonymous No.58043962]

>>58043783
>>58043820
absolutely flamed lmao

[Anonymous No.58044019]

>>58043546
I didn't say that a 4x from the bottom is cents on the dollar.
you're misrepresenting what i said.
just like the 'other' anons.
and here i am, getting called a troll, an indian, schitzo, an idiot, with fallacious reasoning, worthy of reddit gold, condescending, etc.

anon.
say there's 500 million link to be shared between all the clearing houses like dtcc, all the other companies like deutsche telekom, vodafone, all the 10,000 swift banks, let's say there's like 12,000 of these entities that will be part of the iot and run decentralised nodes and stake and use ccip and the build teams etc etc
or you know what, let's say there's 5000. let's say plenty of banks won't be involved and plenty of telephone companies etc won't be involved, just say 5000 big companies and banks will run nodes and are buying link.
there aren't 500 million to go round all these institutions because of retail buy in and eco system incentivising plans but let's say there are.
ok, so we are being generous by saying there's 500 million link to go round and we are saying around 5,000 institutions will be involved in the future infrastructure of finance and everything.
500 million link / by 5,000 institutions = 100,000 links needed by each.

100,000 link multiplied by 7 dollars = $700,000
or let's say 18 dollars = $1.8 million
or let's say 50 dollars = $5 million

do you really think any of these companies care that much about saving $1.1 million (difference between link at $7 vs link at $18) or $3.2 million (difference between link at $18 and link at $50) to get a piece of the future financial infrastructure of everything?
really anon.

and anon, i'm not trying to get anyone to sell. i'm never selling mine and i genuinely believe link is the best call in all of crypto but the idea about btc dumping for it isn't the one and i've explained why in this thread

[Anonymous No.58044025]

>>58041331
you don't seem 100% retarded, so genuine question - why would you hold xrp? you know they literally paid western union or whoever to use their product, right? there is zero adoption. the most you could hope for is like $5-7 if brypto gets to like a 10 trillion mc or something. why bother?

[Anonymous No.58044034]

>>58044019
to add a little more, are you saying that each of these companies are buying more than a hundred thousand. because if each of these institutions and companies are buying more than a hundred thousand then there aren't enough to go round all of them.
and you're telling me that these huge companies with billions and billions aum care so much about saving those figures above that they will crash the btc market?

[Anonymous No.58044052]

>>58043840
although you might be right you are changing the topic.
here we are talking about the price.

[Anonymous No.58044069]

>>58044034
>28 posts in this thread
KEK

[Anonymous No.58044084]

>>58044019
gets called a retard and then proceeds to prove me wrong by tripling down on his retardation
anon do you have even a passing idea of how markets work, you cant buy up 85% of circ supply at the current market price, especially since a fair share of it is held by us who will not sell unless it hits insane valuations
do you now understand why it is so important to fud us, because for one of those 5000 institutions you mentioned to get their share of link they will need one of us to sell it all
and good luck with that my paid for indian friend, today i will not do the needful for the village

[Anonymous No.58044124]

>>58043820
The intern coffee boy? He messed up my order last time so now I make my own

[Anonymous No.58044132]

>>58044084
kek, well said

[Anonymous No.58044143]

>>58038880
Why did you pick a literal jew bank coin as your horse?

[Anonymous No.58044188]

>>58042542
I dont know man, seems like a lot of projection. I think in your mind you’re “owning” this guy but why dont you do a little experiment:

Tell a handful of people in real life that you tracked a random dude’s online posts about masturbating and gauge their reaction. That should give you a good idea of whether or not you are “winner” or “loser” in this scenario

[Anonymous No.58044207]

>>58044124
Wow, that's so cringe you have such little self respect you'd attempt to recover from such a slapdown. What makes it worse is your really bad effort. Stephen Prosperi is an Exec Director at the DTCC, who revealed onstage at Smartcon that the DTCC processed 2.4 QUADRILLION dollars in transactions the previous year.
Are you new? My wife knows more about Chainlink than you, and she only takes a passing interest

[Anonymous No.58044214]

Stop
Using
Leverage

Get
A
Job

[Anonymous No.58044247]

>>58038843
they are probably already rich as hell and losing some millions is nothing for them, like us losing a couple thousand

[Anonymous No.58044424]

>>58044188
>project project wahh wahh
But I didn't compile them in the first place, someone did the board a favor with that one (if I knew who it was and could prove it I would send them a few eth). I just repost it because makes (you) and him seethe. It's hilarious.
Adem the tunisian cockroach has one of the most cursed existences I've seen yet.

[Anonymous No.58044552]

>>58044424
I can't imagine the stress of the threat of his entire fb friends list being sent all that info is doing his stress levels much good, either. Poor Adem. He is a tortured soul.

[Anonymous No.58044573]

>>58044143
KEK
>he doesn't know

[Anonymous No.58044578]

>>58044552
i saved his friends list and will start sending them compilations of his pathetic life when i have some time next week

[Anonymous No.58044633]

>>58043783
Quadrillion is actually a real word but I understand you are still working on your vocabulary as a non English speaker.

[Anonymous No.58044635]

>>58044578
Oh cool. You're the anon i was talking about to it that day. Yes, i screengrabbed most of them in case he locked us out. I think he must be kicking himself he didn't lock it before then, but if he had that would have 100% confirmed it was him, which he obvs wants to avoid. If you're reading this, adem.. we have all of them, ready to go. you're going to have some explaining to do. you might even have to go back to tunaland to escape the shame. oh hang on, there's quite a few on the list there, too. What a pickle. Maybe you could try Corsica?

[Anonymous No.58044668]

>>58044635
different anon, but i saw that thread and figured i would do the needful just in case he locks his profile

[Anonymous No.58044680]

>>58038815
>>58039056
umm...bros???

[Anonymous No.58044686]

>>58042503
>October.
>when link broke out of its range.
Imagine typing this without grasping the point. You have to be trolling. If not, I guess for people like you to finally see the observation for what it is, you have to look at it completely devoid of any ascribed motive or explanation. These explanations enter conspiracy theory terrain very fast and this makes it an almost automatic dismissal for a lot of people, which is understandable. Stretching this dismissal to the phenomenon itself however, is not logical and probably disingenuous.

Look at the data points. Look at the assertion: Almost every time LINK is solo pumping, Bitcoin dumps. Does this mean that Bitcoin can only dump when LINK pumps? Of course not. That is not what this observation implies at all, your post here is completely nonsensical >>58042623. Does this mean Bitcoin always HAS to dump when LINK pumps? Obviously not, because as you mentioned sometimes BTC does not dump when LINK pumps. Coincidentally this usually results in LINK finally breaking out.

So to summarize, we definitely know that more often than not, LINK pumps will be interrupted by BTC dumping. This is fact. An observation going back many years and still being true 90% of the time today. If you cannot accept this you are simply denying reality.

Coming up with an explanation as to WHY this happens, and if it is a conscious effort WHO is exactly doing it, that is a completely different part of the debate. A part where you can type away paragraphs to your heart's content deboonking fellow anons who think they have figured out the how and why. But first you need to come to terms with the fact that there is a strong correlation between LINK breaking out and BTC suddenly breaking through support. Can you do that?

[Anonymous No.58044728]

>>58040887
>Au-Ag
Your fault for not paying attention
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729363/

[Anonymous No.58044768]

>>58044728
Bot post.

[Anonymous No.58044780]

>>58040887
>Occam's razor

[Anonymous No.58044790]

>>58044780
Cute bug.

[Anonymous No.58044840]

Give up your inquiries which are completely useless.

[Anonymous No.58044883]

>>58044686
Great point well made

[Anonymous No.58044946]

>>58044768
Revelation of the method anon. You seem angry anons have figured it out.

[Anonymous No.58044959]

>>58044946
Schizo post?

[Anonymous No.58045089]

>>58044686
i get what you're saying anon and i appreciate you writing without calling me an idiot or schitzo or a retard or whatever. appreciate it.
i'm just a guy who's got some link and i'm not fudding or anything like that so it's annoying to read that from everybody else who was in the thread.
i'm never selling and plan, like many, to just stake and stake. i'm also not trying to get anybody to sell, quite the opposite, get in if you can, as i've said in this thread, i think it's the best play in crypto.
what i can't deal with are the schitzo anons who think that the entire btc market (and therefore etfs too) are being dumped in order to keep link a few dollars lower at each resistance.
i just don't see how that makes sense. there's insufficient reason and although there's obviously some correlation, i do see that, i said that earlier, but i dunno, i don't think it's that strong. anyhow anon, thanks for engaging, let's hope general access is out soon and we start to moon. have a nice evening.

[Anonymous No.58045197]

DR;NS

The real questions are:
WEN CCIP RELEASE?
WEN TRIPPLE DIGITS?

[Anonymous No.58045297]

>>58045197
Q2 2025

[Anonymous No.58045331]

>>58045297
Proof: trust me bro

[Anonymous No.58045502]

>>58044686
Well then, why are they, whoever they are, trying to suppress the price of link? The fact they are even tampering with data on link liquidations shows they are trying to hide the popularity and sentiment around the coin. Is it the hiding strategy? Are Chainlink trying to bide more time creating a bigger moat/warchest before potential competitors come on to the scene? Is the banking cartel desperately trying to hide link from normies/retail? Or are they trying to hide its potential so the few who do have link will sell at $100 instead of $81,000?

[Anonymous No.58045514]

>>58042872
He got the bag and fumbled it

We get the bag and flip it and tumble it

[Anonymous No.58045595]

>>58044424
>>58044552
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuude i i illll send a boomerbook message

>ahhhhhhhhhhhh IM MESSSSSSSAGINNNNG


the stern realization your inner voice must have with yourself when you realize you have absolutely zero power

God could you imagine this guys’ grandma getting some raging incel message on facebook. It’s like getting a telemarketer call to your landline in the 90s. You just hang up and go about your day. And just like that, the incel revenge fantasy dies


HAHAHAHHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA

THE Cuckolds or crypto

[Anonymous No.58045634]

>>58044635
Youve been threatening this for years now.

Whats the exact holdup??? Can you screenshot the message here when you send? You seem like an honest guy but you know what they say…truth>trust


Also dying to see your profile pic. Based on the way you type, sub 3/10

Dude you should at least try lifting so you can bag my leftover chicks maybe post wall. Dont give up!!!

[Anonymous No.58045720]

>>58045634
>Youve been threatening this for years now.
No i haven't. This only occurred a few days ago. No one had mentioned his friends list until then, as far as i'm aware, and I certainly hadn't been involved before.
If you think i'm stupid enough to have a profile pic of me on fb, then you're probably stupid enough to have one of your own. I'm quite sure you do.

[Anonymous No.58045769]

>>58044143
You answered your own question.

[Anonymous No.58045788]

>>58043555
Checked
>when will it be our turn
Fucking eth fags were minted so quickly. Sergey pls

[Anonymous No.58045819]

>>58038815
based thread. had to happen, time to moon. zero percent change any non-defi leverage trading platform will be operational when they announce ccip ga also.

[Anonymous No.58045897]

Mood: Rejuvenated

[Anonymous No.58045910]

>>58038815
That’s not FUN

[Anonymous No.58045990]

>>58045819
>>58045897
>>58045910
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFkcAH-m9W0

[Anonymous No.58046011]

I love this thread man. So insightful
Feels like the fucking good ol’ days ;_;

[Anonymous No.58046052]

>>58045720
He's saying years because he is thomas, and someone probably directly threatened him with this in the past. Amusing way to tell on yourself if you ask me.

[Anonymous No.58046064]

>>58045990
Your highway, no doubt.

[Anonymous No.58046136]

>>58041689
Probably insider information on future announcements and happenings. .

[Anonymous No.58046211]

>>58040534
How long is mid to long term?

[Anonymous No.58046334]

>>58046211
>How long is mid to long term?
roughly similar to short to mid term

[Anonymous No.58046478]

>>58045720
I dont think hes scared tho bud. I think the main prob is youre a cuck :/

On the bright side theres some good video games ie gta where you can live out some of these fantasies

[Anonymous No.58046486]

>>58046478
Please don’t talk to white people when you’re not white.

[Anonymous No.58046494]

>>58046052
Source? Ive seen his “address” aka a picture of a map posted here more times than I can count. Yet every day I look at twitter and he has 4 more posts mocking cucks like yourself. Maybe time for a new strat??

[Anonymous No.58046505]

>>58046486
Awwww baby upset no ones buying le heckin revenge fantasy?

[Anonymous No.58046537]

>>58046478
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7MdVo9IcGI

[Anonymous No.58046551]

>>58046052
Remember this scene: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P9ZpmJ0IrL0

That HAS to reasonate w you

THE Cuckolds of crypto

NOBODY and I mean NOBODY takes a cucking like that, and comes back absolutely BEGGING for more

The delusions have run so far theyve convinced themselves theyre some kind of elite warrriors. Meanwhile its a bunch of ugly incels who cant do 10 pushups


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.58046582]

>>58046551
are we witnessing your mental breakdown?

[Anonymous No.58046646]

Banks don't even consider link as an investment. No one is looking or caring about it as an investment. They will simply use the service as needed and pay in USD as required. It cost us 250k USD in transactions this month alone? So what they'll just send it to jen in accounts to pay like they do with the half million dollar cost of Xerox machines per month.

That's how this will operate. Of course random whales are stealing retail money off 100 different dog tokens and exchanges are hunting longs and shorts. You don't even need to spend 5 minutes providing it. It's like asking do you need air to breathe of course it's happening.

Everyone's antsy and it's absolutely fair because it's been exactly 4 long years of dog shit price action. I'd be calm if we just broke ATH in the next month or two. Instead no matter what news I feel like shit

[Anonymous No.58046690]

every chainlink service will need to be redeployed to work with staking. how long do we think that rollout will take

[Anonymous No.58046856]

>>58046690
what about LPL?

how will you steak without LPL?

huh?

which nodes will you steak with?

LPL

LINK is practically worthless without LPL.

huh?

LPL is why nodes accept your LINK after all ....

huh???

[Anonymous No.58046890]

>>58046646
https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/blockchain/
prob nothing

[Anonymous No.58046911]

>>58046505
I said please don’t talk to white people, you’re not white.

[Anonymous No.58047016]

>>58046911
why do you try to bring race into it? poor show, anon

[Anonymous No.58047384]

>>58043424
who is writing this stuff.. lol

[Anonymous No.58047389]

HEY NEWFAGS. want to know what a thread looks like when its being intentionally derailed? take a look at this one

[Anonymous No.58047413]

>>58046890
I LIKE GOOOOOOOLLLLDD

[Anonymous No.58047562]

>>58046890
ctrl+f chainlink = ..?

[Anonymous No.58047652]

>>58047562
Right here mah nigga

[Anonymous No.58047749]

>>58046890
>https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/blockchain/
that is ACTUALLY the worst web design ive ever seen in the many decades ive been alive. its impressively bad.

[Anonymous No.58047888]

so much mental illness in this thread holy fuck

[Anonymous No.58047929]

>>58047888
just 'ate chainlink
simple as

[Anonymous No.58048045]

>>58045990
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp9S2t-akL0

[Anonymous No.58048166]

>>58042232
It's ridiculous posts like this still need to be made.
The LINK apologism has stepped into the basement to keep coming up with cockamamie reasons to keep holding "just in case". If I would've tipped more of my LINK into FET, SOL, INJ and 0x0 than I did, I'd already have made it. There are no more lessons to learn. It's out of position again heading into the bull, a repeat of the same time in 2021. Idk why we even still talk about it.

[Anonymous No.58048197]

>>58048166
just 'ate chainlink
simple as

[Anonymous No.58048229]

>>58048166
it's the only token with any news whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.58048248]

This is a new low of frustrated demoralized shitflinging lmao, half this thread doesn’t even make sense

[Anonymous No.58048251]

>>58039056
THEY DIDNT GET REMOVED FROM THE SERVER OKAY

TAKE YOUR FUCKING MEDS OK…OKAY

[Anonymous No.58048315]

I will never sell my 2k linkies but damn I'm thinking I need to diversify more into other coins.

[Anonymous No.58048353]

>>58048248
have sex

[Anonymous No.58048381]

>>58043211
I think there will have to be regulatory framework from a 1st world nation that sets a standard. Once one nation proves that bank's proprietary blockchains can serve financial products and allow instant settlement for services then all the rest have a sort of guideline to work with and tweak as needed to fit with local laws.
I think a crash or problem that otherwise could have been prevented with decentralized record keeping would also force action from the affected nations.
I think that until the tech has a legal framework to operate within or reaches a point where adoption is forced, we will still be in this boat. It is also not unreasonable to think that nothing will occur prior to CLL's token supply being fully released into circulation will be a prerequisite for any sort of non-speculative price appreciation. And that in and of itself is assuming enough customer's and demand to cause such an effect. The sort of milestones us holder's daydream about where a link is worth 81k would require the sort of thing no sleep anon posts about and what early linkies speculated about in 2017 to come to fruition (link integrating with everything and being defacto installed in every OS sold be it phone or PC, connecting all IOT devices from security cameras to your smart fridge and car to national blockchains, used by banks and stock markets, securing your walmart debit purchase and being used for their inventory and book keeping etc.) Were a long way out from that but it doesnt mean people wont get rich from link in the interim.

[Anonymous No.58048415]

>>58044124
Big step up from asking your mom to make it for you, champ. Were all so proud

[Anonymous No.58048426]

>>58047749
Yeah this is what you get when you hire UI designers who studied graphic design and place an emphasis on marketing. Unusable shite

[Anonymous No.58048432]

>>58046646
>>58046890

>>58048402

[Anonymous No.58048483]

>>58045634
Protip.

Do you want to btfo an advocate and drive them away from your threads? Just ask them how much money they’re making from running a node.

They tell you to be patient while getting paid a hefty salary working as community advocates, as well as making money running their own KYC’d nodes for chainlink labs. That’s why they don’t care if the token goes up in price or not.

All these “multiple anons” debating you and “bullish” on link telling you 2 more weeks? All of them are only 2-3 advocates switching IPs.

They don’t need to be patient, they just need you to shut the fuck up, accept Sergey’s dumps and stop complaining to make their lives easier.

[Anonymous No.58048500]

>>58048381
Holy fuck my grammar is atrocious. Im brown and english is my 5th language guys, i swear.

[Anonymous No.58049047]

>>58039056
postin in schizophrenic bread
>>58039120
why though? why not keep the liquidations as a warning to "front running history"?

[Anonymous No.58049067]

>>58042872
unironically yes and anons predicted it

[Anonymous No.58049153]

>>58044686
>Does this mean that Bitcoin can only dump when LINK pumps? Of course not.
I've seen so many fuddies """debunk""" the suppression with this exact retardation.

Great post, anon. You have the patience of a saint.

[Anonymous No.58049233]

>>58049153
Very semitic of them to pilpul in the same manner with the same retarded dialectics

[Anonymous No.58049351]

>>58048229
Is it really news if the market completely disregards it time and time again? Is it news if we're weeks out from the end of Q1 and still no CCIP GA? Still no material developments on fees or tokenomics?

What I said was we're out of position anyway. That's a matter of fact. Pissing around at $20 for fuck's sake. Look at SOL, look at any number of other alts. I can't fucking believe I still have capital in this bullshit. What the fuck am i doing here still. I'd laugh if I could

[Anonymous No.58049425]

>>58049233
Or it's all the same guy.

>>58049351
Most of the time, Link tries to pump on news. But then you-know-what happens.

[Anonymous No.58049431]

>>58044424
it was me who originally found his embarrassing blog in jan of last year and got him to shut his account down and change it from "@geoxadem" the first time
if i remember to reply to this post when i get home before the thread dies ill prove it
i also got him to shut his account down for a few days a second time, later on in the year when i got bored and felt like posting his name and face

that's not the end of it though
there's still the final batch of info ill put out during links next moon
he wont even be able to enjoy the gains from his babydick stack (if he still has it)

[Anonymous No.58049462]

>>58049351
what is the video in the gif?

[Anonymous No.58049565]

>>58041474
>>58041474
>>58041474
JUST IN
JUST IN
All the bitmex liquidations in the picture above have been removed from coinglass.

CAPTCHA: TODYAY

[Anonymous No.58049622]

>>58049425
>Most of the time, Link tries to pump on news. But then you-know-what happens.
It's really not that black and white. Sure, it definitely happens sometimes. But otherwise for LINK it's a painful climb up. Every single dollar feels like you're ripping out half you're teeth. Meanwhile every other vaporware scam piece of shit breezes through multiple dollars in a single pump.

At this point this has gone on long enough that we don't have any other boogeymen to blame this on besides Chainlink/Sergey himself. Which on one hand still makes no sense to me since the retards stand to immensely benefit from a higher token price since the only confirmed utility of the token is just selling them to fund CLL.

[Anonymous No.58049631]

>>58049622
Link ran up to $20 easily enough, it's only when they turned the suppression bots back on that Link started struggling again.

[Anonymous No.58049632]

>>58049431
here we go - the old throwaway account which i retired later on
good times
this is the earliest cap i have (a day after he changed his account from @geoxadem iirc,) but the first posts i made with that collage were on his fud spam threads on biz when i recognized him to give him a fair warning, which he of course was wayyy too fucking dumb to take

i dont want any eth
i just want that retarded fag to know i'm still around having a laugh at his expense whenever i check in on this dead shithole a couple times a week

[Anonymous No.58049634]

>>58049431
Based and stalker pilled. Doing God's work stalkeranon. After the singularity all fuddies will be kidnapped, stripped naked and sent to South Africa

[Anonymous No.58049656]

>>58046551
>Just like the moooovie
Yeh bro so cool..

[Anonymous No.58049667]

>>58049631
I guess how easily it went up to $20 is subjective, but personally it still felt pretty shitty to me. LINK always has these prices where it gets stuck for months and any attempt at breaking out causes the market the get nuked. We've all seen it plenty of times before. No one has ever been able to show similar behavior with any other alt.

[Anonymous No.58049671]

>>58038815

Trump told us...

[Anonymous No.58049674]

>>58049671

He just want MAGA anon

[Anonymous No.58049682]

>>58048381
picrel

[Anonymous No.58049685]

>>58049667
>LINK always has these prices where it gets stuck for months
Because of shit like this: >>58042171

it happens constantly, they did it at $16 too

[Anonymous No.58049695]

>>58049431
>>58049632
lmao thats funny as fuck

[Anonymous No.58049716]

>>58049634
i mean he had told plenty of people to kill themselves and was quite nasty even then, so its just karma that i put my old skip tracing skills to good use by making sure he gets haunted by embarrassing shit every time he sticks his nose out on here

>>58049695
im very very comfy thanks to eth -> ans / neo rebrand -> link
it has left me with way too much spare time to do shit like that, but im glad we all got a laugh out of it

[Anonymous No.58049756]

>>58049716
There is some freak replying the 'I can't perform' -image to every one of his posts on X now as well
Idk if its a bot or someone with autism

[Anonymous No.58049768]

>>58049667
Hell they just did it again

[Anonymous No.58049811]

>>58049716
ooh, good work anon! i'm guessing that's somewhere in... Holland, perchance? you got an address? i'm sure a few of us would love to visit. maybe we could all meet up!

[Anonymous No.58049814]

>>58049667
>>58049768

>>58049779

[Anonymous No.58049857]

>>58049756
kek that definitely isn't me
i remember there was a guy who had a bot spamming the "discord nufudder" pasta on fud threads for a while so that could be him
>>58049811
you're right, but im keeping the address for something more fun that doesn't involve anons turning themselves into criminals
being a 'crypto guy' isn't a good thing when you don't live in a good area, especially when the right people know - ill leave it at that for now

[Anonymous No.58049901]

>>58049857
you tease. i'm trying to imagine our adem's reaction to seeing that pic. it's 0949 in holland rn so he'll just be having his cornflakes around now. what a glorious start to the day this'll be for him.
Hey, adem, how does that pic make you feel? does it help you perform?

[Anonymous No.58050027]

New thread up about the liquidations >>58049775

[Anonymous No.58050456]

>>58039056
bumping

[Anonymous No.58051349]

>>58039469
Glowing ID

>>58039083
Divine Captcha

>>58041844
Optimistic check

Put me on the screencap when they make the "Dumb Money" out of this. I will buy 100 Linkies because of this thread.

Selling at 300 $