CCIP has generated $250k+ in fees in a single day

[Anonymous No.58006195]

Presented without comment

[Anonymous No.58006209]

Wow it almost makes as much as a sports star makes in a day cool. How's that going to turn link to $1k eoy exactly?

[Anonymous No.58006216]

Who cares? Genuine question.

[Anonymous No.58006218]

>>58006195
oh gracious me that is quite substantial. I daresee chainlink is looking rather virile and, dare I say it, girthy

[Anonymous No.58006228]

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS LPL POOLS CLOSED SEETHE

[Anonymous No.58006244]

>>58006195
$1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.58006258]

So like when does my net worth start going up? Lol

[Anonymous No.58006269]

Where do those fees go exactly?

[Anonymous No.58006281]

>>58006195
Linkpool definitely fucked this dashboard up. The amount of fees does not align with the number of transactions which are not increasing by much.

[Anonymous No.58006300]

>>58006209
keeping with your retarded sports star analogy, CCIP generating 250k/day in early access is like your big sports star making that when he was 7 years old playing tee ball

[Anonymous No.58006302]

>>58006228
whats ... this ... FUCKING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO SHIT???

[Anonymous No.58006313]

[Anonymous No.58006386]

>>58006281
Here is a screenshot. The total requests are not exponentially increasing with the revenue. Its not like chainlink only started charging a fee in Feb.
I assume where linkpool fucked up is in including token transfer volume or something which imo should not be included in revenue and definitely not under a chart titled "fees".

[Anonymous No.58006617]

>>58006269
HR roasties

[Anonymous No.58006690]

>>58006386
Not necessarily. They can pool request much like a rollup.
Honestly, it feels more like this is a stresstest than actual revenue to me and i'm a bagholder since 2018

[Anonymous No.58006699]

How does this increase value of LINK exactly though? I don’t see how it works.

[Anonymous No.58006737]

>>58006281
>>58006386
>no the fees CAN'T be that high, it's a MISTAKE, no, NOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.58006753]

>>58006690
>>58006617
>>58006386
>>58006313
>>58006302
>>58006300
>>58006281
>>58006269
>>58006258
>>58006244
>>58006228
>>58006218
>>58006216
>>58006209
>>58006195
Assuming 100% goes into token value, this is $91.25M per year or $0.09 increase in token price per year.

And it's still in testing. I'm pumped.

[Anonymous No.58006832]

>>58006737
fees have to correlate with requests, unless you jump through logical hoops like >>58006690
to fool yourself

[Anonymous No.58006835]

its more like a revenue generating hamster wheel

40m in yearly revenue from pricefeeds while dumping 500m in tokens a year and then some completely irrelevant dust from ccip. its one of the least profitable most subsidized(by paypigs) tech startups of all time

[Anonymous No.58006857]

>>58006386
>The total requests are not exponentially increasing with the revenue
This doesn't matter as much as you think.
The revenue is tied to the value that is being transferred, so it's likely that that's what increased.
one random major example that comes to mind is that Circle started using CCIP for USDC cross-chain bridging.
that or stress testing dunno.

[Anonymous No.58006918]

>>58006300
>>58006209
>>58006753
You lot are missing the point that the daily network fees are going up exponentially. Yesterday was half that amount, and a week or so ago it was only about $30k.
tomorrow could be $500k easily. We don't know when this rate will stop increasing, and we're still in early access. Can you fuckers imagine what it'll be like when GA kicks in, and then Swift start using it, and the DTCC, plus all the other Link services that use the token?
$1000 is beginning to sound laughably low

[Anonymous No.58006949]

LOL SHITCOIN HAS ONLY MAINTAINED ITS LOCAL TOP FOR WEEKS NOW IT'S OVER SELL NOW

[Anonymous No.58006956]

>>58006918
Except the actual price is 20 dollars you crackhead nigger.

[Anonymous No.58006958]

>>58006195
>look how expensive this piece of shit technology is to use
wow amazing

[Anonymous No.58006959]

>>58006918
2 1 6

*

3 7 5

[Anonymous No.58006982]

they called us stinky

[Anonymous No.58006992]

Please don't get my hopes up.
I'd be devestated if it turns out they take the source and destination fees into account when calculating "revenue".
We will be the laughing stock again when it turns out 90% of this "revenue" goes to Eth fags.

[Anonymous No.58006998]

>>58006281
I was thinking this too but it turns out that Linkpool’s ‘Requests’ graphs are broken, they haven’t been updating.

[Anonymous No.58007005]

>>58006195
ICP does it faster, for cheaper, and makes chainshit obsolete

[Anonymous No.58007008]

That money will go to rostie employees, it won't pump your bags. Your ponzi is literally one dump away from becoming the next SafeMoon.

[Anonymous No.58007044]

>>58006918
even if it made 10 million a day it's not enough revenue to justify the FDV of 21 billion. Chainlink needs to make at least 100 million a day to be fairly valued

[Anonymous No.58007047]

>>58006753
>what is speculation and anticipation of yearly income

[Anonymous No.58007049]

>>58007008
This. Sergey is taking all that revenue to buy more Big Macs

[Anonymous No.58007054]

>>58006918
$1,000 is just gonna be a benchmark once things get rolling. It’s not going to stop til at least $5-10k

[Anonymous No.58007057]

>>58006195
Holy shit the seething is going exponential here.

[Anonymous No.58007066]

>>58006918
The doubling time isn't far from 2 days so it can't last all that long before numbers become ridiculous

[Anonymous No.58007072]

>>58007044
>a stock needs to earn 160% more yearly then its marketcap

[Anonymous No.58007080]

>>58006195
>It costs alot to use the technology
Since when was that a good thing? Why would I want to adopt it if it costs alot for me to use....

[Anonymous No.58007086]

why are people buying link as if there is no tomorrow?

[Anonymous No.58007103]

>>58006998
A few days ago Eric Wallach or whatever his name is shut down his dashboard and directed people to this one, and now this one is breaking right as ccip fees really go exponential?

[Anonymous No.58007127]

>>58007086
>>58006313

[Anonymous No.58007243]

The only fud now is the price. That's pretty cool ngl. fudsisters have all but given up and will just keep saying price until it moons. They have nothing left in their ammunition.
Actually, this has given me an idea for a thread: 'What was your favourite Chainlink fud over the years?" -we could compile a table based on the results. Hmm. Token Not Needed is a contender but there are so many. We should draw up a list

[Anonymous No.58007264]

At this rate, it will only be a bit over 100 years before sirgays supply of link will be depleted and users will have to buy link on the market, finally pushing up the price.

[Anonymous No.58007299]

>>58006918
Status= Comfy

[Anonymous No.58007321]

>>58007044
>google needs to make 3 billion dollars per day to justify it's mcap

[Anonymous No.58007346]

>>58007057
yea lol its absolutely bonkers how unhinged these niggers get whenever good news pop up

>>58006209
>>58006216
>>58006699
>>58006835
>>58006958
>>58007008

[Anonymous No.58007445]

>>58007072
out of the 100million maybe 10$ is net profit. big companies operate on very slim margins

[Anonymous No.58007479]

>>58006195

[Anonymous No.58007525]

>>58006959
I understand 216 what is the significance of 375

[Anonymous No.58007541]

>>58006216
(you). Thats why youre here.

[Anonymous No.58007544]

>>58007346
Bro it’s over. LINK will never reach ath again because nobody really cares or knows about it to begin with. Ask yourself this: if it truly is as important as you retards are making it out to be, why isn’t r/ all over it?

Food for thought.

[Anonymous No.58007584]

>>58007544
Here is some food for thought.

Remember the staking pool?

Well turns out it is closed.

[Anonymous No.58007617]

>>58007445
>>58007044
very good fud for 110 iq plebs, bravo

[Anonymous No.58007625]

>>58007103
Read my comment and look at the graph yourself, namely the cumulative requests graph, the past 3 days have shown no new requests.

[Anonymous No.58007642]

>>58006195

[Anonymous No.58007857]

>>58007625
might it be that the cumulative requests graph is broken while the fee's one is in order?

[Anonymous No.58007989]

>>58007625
The cumulative fees graph also stopped updating. Says it updated 12 minutes ago but they have the same number for at least like 5 hours

[Anonymous No.58007995]

why is NO ONE questioning WHY there's this sudden increase in usage and WHERE does it come from

[Anonymous No.58008024]

>>58007995
because they want it to be true so bad. The funny thing is that even if the revenue increase is true (it is not, look at the transactions, they have not increased enough to show this increase in revenue) its still not moving the token whatsoever lmao

[Anonymous No.58008062]

>>58007995
first time?

because there have been various 'breadcrumbs' over the years to get the price moving from 7 to 9 and then around the 10-14 price, there's been sudden increase shown on dune before... last time wasn't it millions of wrapped eth or whatever maybe i'm wrong, or millions of australian dollars or whatever it was, and then that plays into a mini 10% rise of link into btc price and then it turns out the dashboard is broken or the guy running it said it made an error or it isn't akchually real value its just testnet and then the price goes down back to where it was and all the euphoria was for nothing and we wait again,

yeah it's either your first time or your shilling too

[Anonymous No.58008102]

>>58006195
I wish the price would go exponential

[Anonymous No.58008135]

>>58008024
if it is true then you're retarded if you don't think price will reflect eventually
steak will onboard ccip at some point and it's just the beginning, this is a very significant moment

bezos email to shareholders dot jpg

>>58008062
braindead post, also jonneh confirmed it's not broken
https://twitter.com/linkpoolio/status/1768004602748694644

[Anonymous No.58008307]

>>58008024
>its still not moving the token whatsoever
seriously? No... you really think $250k is going to move the price? LMAO how new are you to this market?

[Anonymous No.58008309]

>>58006918
You should be taken out and flogged publicly for trying to brainwash the masses, if only anyone cares

[Anonymous No.58008340]

>>58008309
What's that smell? Is that.... is that ... CURRY?

[Anonymous No.58008355]

>>58007243
1. tnn
2. zeus capital
3. 2 man team
4.

[Anonymous No.58008370]

>>58006195

Please explain like I’m five what this is?

[Anonymous No.58008426]

>>58008307
yeah im telling linkies it is not going to move the token. re read my post retard. we agree.

[Anonymous No.58008449]

>>58008135
12th, 13th and 14th, all no new request.
Why are there no new requests? Since the launch, there has been no other days without a new request, now we get 3 in a row at a time when fees are spiking?
There is no way it isn't broken, both numbers shouldn't be trusted..

[Anonymous No.58008450]

>>58008355
Zeus is defo high on the list. sorry about the curry comment i thought you were being rude

[Anonymous No.58008494]

>>58008426
The point is that the revenue is increasing at a parabolic rate. Can;t you see that if it's increasing at this level this early before GA, that's bullish? Are you REALLY this dim that you think it'll stay at today's earnings forever? come on man, do better

[Anonymous No.58008552]

>>58008494
I don't believe these numbers first of all, where is the increase in transactions? you also forgot that the token is unpumpable. the team subsidizes 100 percent of CCIP fees thru their unfathomably large wallets, which they will do forever. (there is no GA ever coming)

[Anonymous No.58008578]

>>58008494
point is we aren't sure it is increasing at a parabolic rate because we aren't certain the dashboard is accurate.

cumulative request update isn't working + cumulative fees update is working (what we want, for now)
or
both aren't working (possible)
or
cumulative request update is working + cumulative fee's update isn't working (unlikely, to say the least)
or
both are working (unlikely again)

so until we know then we are reluctant to get ahead of ourselves again, considering the variety of breadcrumbs and the constant shilling by those who should know better over the years...
course though want it to be real. who on this board doesn't?

[Anonymous No.58008589]

>>58007243
shadow fork
nail salon
toilet stage
philosophy major
btc manipulation (real)
proof of concept
lower marketcap than gravelcoin
are oracles worth $32M?
large financial institutions will just make their own oracles
witnet
sergey wears the same thing every day
fat

[Anonymous No.58008604]

>>58008552
Ah right, fud. Ok. Such fun. I wish i had your zany sense of humour. Later.

[Anonymous No.58008605]

>>58008552
and then there's this, from whence come the payments

[Anonymous No.58008633]

>>58008578
If only we had a way of verifying what was being said was true. is there an api to pull the data from?

[Anonymous No.58008666]

>>58008578
lol they updated the numbers and erased nearly a million usd in fees

[Anonymous No.58008671]

https://dune.com/linkpool/chainlink-ccip

Absolutely broken.. fees now 70% lower than they where earlier today, still no requests over the last couple of days.

[Anonymous No.58008683]

>>58008578
we have no reason to think they'd make it up so we shall go with the numbers presented. If it's wrong, so be it, but i'll take it at face value. It's just changed over from eric wallach's overseeing so they likely haven't sorted the other ones yet. Doesn't mean the revenue one is a lie. Of course, i know you want us to think it is.

[Anonymous No.58008717]

>>58006195
Sounds like the fees are too expensive.

[Anonymous No.58008723]

>>58008683
Okay it just changed all the figures so there is defo something wrong. Fuck!

[Anonymous No.58008725]

>>58008671
looks like a horse took a poop in the pool again

[Anonymous No.58008739]

>>58006195
LINK $500 eoy

[Anonymous No.58008740]

>>58006195
So how does this translate into profit for LINKcel token (not needed) holders?

[Anonymous No.58008741]

>>58008723

[Anonymous No.58008791]

>>58006195
Is this supposed to be a lot? And right on cue you have link cuckolds jacking each other off in the thread. It's so pathetic to look at.

[Anonymous No.58008924]

I'm guessing linkpool fucked this up like they fucked up everything else

[Anonymous No.58008955]

>>58008671
there we go then.
it's another case of breadcrumbs that don't really go anywhere yet and it leading to some price action into btc but before we really get anywhere we realise it wasn't actually what we were hoping it was / some were shilling it to be.
of course, they might update it again and then it is accurate and says 1.4 million or whatever.

>>58008683
no reason to think they'd make it up?
so we shall go with the numbers presented?
and you're the one said earlier in the thread my post was braindead when i said there's a good chance the numbers on the dune dashboard aren't right. and you say there's no reason they'd make it up.
read that back to yourself.
these nulinkers are ridiculous. how did they get in on what i've been holding for so long. you have to be shilling.
got as much logic going for them as a broken packet of yoghurt.
inb4
>but random twitter guy confirmed it broken, not broken, broken, not broken , UPDATED, NOT UPDATED, UPDATED, NOT UPDATED

as i said before, first time?
because if you can't figure out how these breadcrumbs work, and it seems like you can't, then you're going to keep being disappointed with link's price.

you actually said 'we have no reason to think they'd make it up so we shall go with the numbers presented'

have you actually understand anything about link?

[Anonymous No.58008983]

>>58006918
AAAAAH IM GONNA CROOOOMB IM CROOOOMING

[Anonymous No.58009014]

Jason parser already did the shadow fork which downgraded the link token to an erc-1 sorry chuds

[Anonymous No.58009037]

>>58008725
Yeah, not sure why anyone would trust anything from the linkpoo scammer

[Anonymous No.58009064]

>>58008955
That's a lot of angry stuff there,anon. Let's see.
>no reason to think they'd make it up? so we shall go with the numbers presented?
correct
>and you're the one said earlier in the thread my post was braindead
no, i wasn't. that was someone else
>these nulinkers are ridiculous. how did they get in on what i've been holding for so long. you have to be shilling.
got as much logic going for them as a broken packet of yoghurt.
maybe if you checked who you were replying to before going on angry tirades you wouldn't get yourself into this muddle
>you actually said 'we have no reason to think they'd make it up so we shall go with the numbers presented'
correct.
>have you actually understand anything about link?
yes, have i actually understand.

Hope this helps.

[Anonymous No.58009076]

>>58006258
When you sell your link and buy something better

[Anonymous No.58009089]

>>58006209
>>58006216
kek fuddies

[Anonymous No.58009096]

>>58009064
if i mistook you for the other anon, my bad, wasn't for you and it's on me.
not meaning to come with bad vibes either, so i'll take them back too.

[Anonymous No.58009111]

>>58006195
yeah but the price is still -99%

[Anonymous No.58009122]

The numbers in the dashboard is a 10th of what they were an hour ago... LOL. Wanna bet that they didn't deduct the gas fees before?

[Anonymous No.58009126]

If the transaction volume is constant then that means the price paid in link has increased massively, but why would any contract have such a high transaction/fulfillment cost?

I don't see the use case.

I want to believe but I am completely skeptical at this point.

[Anonymous No.58009133]

>>58009096
It's all good. Thanks for apologising.

[Anonymous No.58009134]

linkpool fucked up the dashboard

[Anonymous No.58009153]

>>58009134
FUCKING HELL I KNEW IT >>58006992
AAAAAHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.58009161]

>>58009134
those faggots better be getting slashed for this

[Anonymous No.58009205]

>>58009134
>ITS REAL
>https://x.com/linkpoolio/status/1768435337376727429?s=46
OH LIIINNKIESSSSS!!!

[Anonymous No.58009211]

>>58009134
What a bunch of amateurs.

[Anonymous No.58009215]

>>58009134
Fucking hell. Is everything with 'Linkpool' attached to it fucking dogshit? Let me guess. They'll change it to SDL CCIP dashboard and relaunch it

[Anonymous No.58009218]

>>58009134
yep, as expected lmao

[Anonymous No.58009232]

>>58008589
>linkies will slide this comment because they have no rebuttal

[Anonymous No.58009256]

>>58009134
On the bright side, fees have doubled since Feb and we are only 15 days into this month.

[Anonymous No.58009257]

>>58009134
how can anyone with good conscience shill SDL in any shape or form

[Anonymous No.58009273]

>>58007243
HR roasties is my personal fave. It just rolls off the tongue and plus there is an element of truth in it so it makes it that much more potent.

[Anonymous No.58009331]

>>58009257
Because they’ll have the largest first mover advantage on the largest emerging market of the millennia. I don’t trust them with my LINK at this stage by any means, but I’m happy to stake some SDL.

[Anonymous No.58009357]

>>58006195
At this point I hope all the linkfags get rich as fuck just so they’ll go away. The stinkmarine cope cancer has gone on so fucking long

[Anonymous No.58009398]

This thread is really slowing down now that linkpool updated the numbers haha. Isn’t that crazy?

[Anonymous No.58009509]

>>58009398
I feel kinda deflated. I think we were all quite excited about it. i was.

[Anonymous No.58009521]

This should be known as 'The Great Linkpool Dashboard Debacle'

[Anonymous No.58009538]

>>58009509
So back to being demoralized? I’ve got 5k link but this price action has been a beat down ngl

[Anonymous No.58009567]

>>58009205
>delivering the transparency the community seeks every day
sure Johnny, that's what your brand is known for, transparency

[Anonymous No.58009619]

>>58006300
Fuddy ran away from this post like a scalded dog and he hopes we didnt notice it.

[Anonymous No.58009645]

>>58009398
>>58009521
so incompetent...
the funny thing is that the actual numbers are bullish enough
but instead that fuck it up and create fud
some really big accounts like satoshi flipper retweeted... not a good look

[Anonymous No.58009648]

>>58009134
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff02mApjDbE

[Anonymous No.58009757]

>>58009134
>>58009134
in case anyones curious about who makes up the actual fees flowing into CCIP

note: i was only able to pull a max of 2,000 transactions from the API for each sourceNetwork, which is why the total i have is different than the total they have. it pulls the most recent 2,000 records, so this shows the current users of ccip

data pulled straight from the official ccip api (ccip.chain.link/api)

[Anonymous No.58009774]

>>58009757
also i only really tried to label the first 5, so if anyone wants to label the others they might be easy to map to a dapp

i spent way too much time on the two addresses labeled "appears to be chainlink labs" really fucking trying to believe they were dApps, so i didnt feel like researching the last few that make up a small % anyway

[Anonymous No.58009787]

>>58009757
Thats 17000 dollars as the fee, r...right? Not Link. Because if thats Link...

[SWEATING INTENSIFIES]

[Anonymous No.58009803]

>>58006195
Like Ethereum gas fees, they are predatory
That's why I swapped all my EVMs to BRC20 using SatoshiRouter
I fucking hate fees I fucking hate fees I fucking hate fees I fucking hate fees

[Anonymous No.58009812]

>>58009787
yeah total fee is in USD, not TKN. it sums the USD value of various TKNs each wallet might have used to pay

[Anonymous No.58009815]

>>58009134
Too busy rimming horses to get their own shit right it seems

[Anonymous No.58009839]

>>58009134
By the way, whatever they changed... they went from 400 lines of code to over 2k. Very odd indeed.

[Anonymous No.58009840]

>>58009134
even if it was accurate, its still several orders of magnitude away from being an impactful volume

linkies are the most deluded braindead holders in crypto, worse than hexicans

[Anonymous No.58009883]

>>58009839
Actually never mind, mixed up 2 different windows there

[Anonymous No.58009922]

Peng is about to RUN

[Anonymous No.58009981]

>>58009134
Wait so these fucking faggots lied??? Are we even making money at all?? Is CCIP even real

[Anonymous No.58010045]

>>58009757
it's definitely testing
just paste the transaction tests into the ccip explorer, decode to Text and you can see they are sending messages:
>new message with Id 3
etc
but don't tell anyone, drake won't like

[Anonymous No.58010086]

>>58009981
CCIP test net is real, revenue is going up too, they just fucked it up. Here is the real scoop though: the transactions are basically totally funded by team wallets and general access is at best probably 10 years away for real. Until then the token will dump and bleed because there is no driving force for the demand to go up, because again, the network is subsidized. The time horizon here is not two weeks as many linkies perpetually tout. It is more like two decades. Another point that must be made that i have seen some others bring up before but must be brought up again is this: anyone developer who really wants to use CCIP can use it now with permission. The reason CCIP is not going to general access is because they know that everyone using it and testing on it now is it. There will not be an influx of users. the users using now are the only people using it. They will dragon out general access and dangle it like a carrot over linkies heads for probably years, and link will bleed through another bear market, so heads up on that.

[Anonymous No.58010089]

>>58010045
the 5th wallet is also cll testing
you can see the same testing message format

[Anonymous No.58010114]

>>58006195
Meanwhile the prices stays around $20 or dumps.

Anyone who holds this during a bullrun will continue remaining poor

[Anonymous No.58010126]

Lmao so all the numbers were fake

Linkies really can’t catch a break. The cucks of crypto

[Anonymous No.58010218]

>>58010126
pretty much,
maybe $50k of the fees are real
which is fine and what most would have expected at this point anyway with very little live

but linkpool has done a lot of damage without checking the numbers properly and then failing to understand that most fees were from cll testing
crazy they didn't run it past a cll data person
a really bad look

[Anonymous No.58010318]

>>58007525
$81,000 new fag

[Anonymous No.58010348]

>>58010218
>crazy they didn't run it past a cll data person

From the outside looking in, it appears the LPL team and CLL haven't been working together on the same page since at least 2021.

The reason Johnny dumped LPL for SDL at the end of 2022 was because they couldn't get any funding, funding they solicited sergey for. They gave sergey 20m of the new dilluted supply seemingly as a good gesture, but rory suggested they had no idea/nothing to do with the restructuring or the new allotments.

[Anonymous No.58010365]

>>58006753
At least 50% of that has to go directly into hr roastie salaries

[Anonymous No.58010442]

>>58009981
STFU incel Patrick Collins is not "seething" take your goddamn meds

[Anonymous No.58010474]

Lmao jonneh deleted all the tweets and now it's showing low revenues again it was all a big failure, imagine trusting this horse rimmer again

[Anonymous No.58010522]

this'll shoot us down to 18

[Anonymous No.58010561]

>>58010318
Yeah I'm not retarded. I staked more link than you. I was asking what was the significance of those numbers. 216 and 375.
>The ratio 3: 5: 7 is very important. The ratio represents the steps in Freemasonry. They are the steps are the exact number of brothers that form the number of Master Masons needed to open a lodge.

216*357= 77,112

[Anonymous No.58010582]

>>58010561
oh shid

[Anonymous No.58010605]

>>58010348
kind of makes sense
but why did they still gives cll 7% of the supply when they restructured the tokenomics?
could have just cut them out then?
but definitely they have been frozen out by cll after the rugpull, that's clear, would have thought they'd still have some other communications though
wonder if there's tension about SDL taking all the community space though (well anyting over 500 link)
also source on rory saying that?

[Anonymous No.58010608]

>>58007995
>usage

Bro it’s literally in testnet all these graphs mean nothing.

[Anonymous No.58010619]

>the cumulative chart remains vertical

LMAO what a fucking nigger

[Anonymous No.58010773]

>>58010619
This months fees are on track to 3x at the very least compared to the total accumulated during last month.

[Anonymous No.58010803]

>>58010608
it is mainnet but a lot of the activity is cll testing on it
which makes sense
but these numbers are really about $50k through actual activity

[Anonymous No.58010899]

Cumulative charts should never be used in this context. Absolutely terrible

[Anonymous No.58011090]

>>58010773
>$9k/day is 3x higher than $3k/day
WTF $1000 EOY!

[Anonymous No.58011307]

As someone who works with data, when you see a sudden anomaly like this it's always a fuckup and you always go back and keep checking your work until you find the fuckup. This was so obvious and incredibly retarded.

[Anonymous No.58011480]

wait, arent fees bad tho?

[Anonymous No.58011530]

>>58006195
>$252k
>1 trillion LINK
$0.0002 revenue per link

[Anonymous No.58011629]

>>58008589
Jason parser is my personal number 1
That one fudded me out for several weeks in 2018
But the relentless fudspam made me dmor so it turned out the fudsisters were enormously contraproductive

[Anonymous No.58011656]

>>58007642
lol

[Anonymous No.58011691]

>>58009134
All the fudsisters thinking this is some own against link
While at this stage the total number is peanuts anyways and the growth rate is all that matters
So things are still good as at the start of the thread

[Anonymous No.58011692]

>>58010619
this faggot needs to be humbled

[Anonymous No.58011763]

>>58011691
desperation. you sound completely defeated.

[Anonymous No.58012476]

>>58006195
90 mil revenue a year? that's it?
and this is implying all these fees are even real and not Chainlink Labs "testing" their release

[Anonymous No.58012503]

>>58011691
Shah. Don't mention the growth rate, that'll spoil the fud. Focus on the figures. Laugh about how Amazon make more than that and its not really very much. Stay well away from the increasing growth.

[Anonymous No.58013127]

>>58006302
Some seething brownoid that was mind-broken from missing out on staking and just repeats the mockery he was given when he didn't get in the pool.

[Anonymous No.58013133]

>>58010619
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.58013601]

>>58010474
next time it will be somebody else, about a whole other breadcrumb, who 'verified' it on twitter and other anons will lap it up and call those who approach it cynically retarded or something.

>>58011307
you're right, with exceptions proving the rule, but people still believed the numbers and will again next time.

>>58010218
''done a lot of damage without checking the numbers properly and then failing to understand ''
''crazy they didn't run it past a cll data person''
''a really bad look''

what could be achieved by all this.
makes you wonder, doesn't it?

>>58010086
pretty much the best take in here.
revenue is going up, that's obvious without a dashboard, but it's largely subsidised anyways, so on the one hand good on the other hand pff and we are where we are.
banks pressing the button is a long way away.

what's the next breadcrumb going to be?
with the market stalling on weekends these days and some events in London, i'm guessing the latest breadcrumb will start today, it will be connected to the talk and something that will be hinted at, and will carry it along for the next couple of weeks until the next thing. I'm guessing April we start getting speakers confirmed at smartcon, that'll provide ample speculation (oh but whoever whatever will be there which means this) and should also get some Sibos news, maybe a different stage, so that will carry as some of the way too, and in between all that of course citibank or barclays or deloitte or somebody in Asia will release a report on real world assets and how that necessitates chainlink.
still years away yet the shills will tell us it's imminent and the newer holders will take it to mean what they're told it means.
and to think Sergey implored them to read Nietzsche to improve their life.
can lead a horse to water, as they say.
but don't flog it in Turin.
or as the British might say, we are all flogging a dead horse because until the banks say yes, if they say yes, we copy bitcoin

[Anonymous No.58013679]

>>58013601
>but it's largely subsidised anyways
Irrelevant. Bitcoin mining is still 95% subsidized right now.

[Anonymous No.58013686]

>>58013601
Jesus christ. Just write a book, faggot.

[Anonymous No.58013693]

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=87393&page=1

[Anonymous No.58013711]

>>58010086
>They will dragon out general access
smaug, mushu or spyro?
sounds pretty cool to be honest

[Anonymous No.58013724]

>>58013711
>smaug, mushu or spyro?
Puff

[Anonymous No.58013741]

>>58010619
but thats the important part not the actual number
for once clg is correct

[Anonymous No.58013780]

>>58013741
short 12 year old is growing but doing so very very slowly.
once puberty ends can't grow more.
malnutrition is a contributing factor.

>but what's important is that he is still growing vertically

[Anonymous No.58013816]

>>58013780
absolutely retarded analogy
is this the best you fudsisters have

[Anonymous No.58013858]

>>58013816
fudsister?

i hold more link than you. longer than you.
but you, mon anon, can't see the woods for the trees.
this entire thread started because 'fees are going parabolic' and anons like myself were pointing out that linkies should relax a little because it probably isn't what it seems, and now the thread has become 'oh but at least it is still going up' .
it's cumulative anon. cumulative.
you use statistics like that when you want to hide something or lie.
now of course, that it's going up is BETTER than it not going up, for sure, but that's like saying it's better that the short 12 year old boy is still growing taller, albeit slowly, than not growing taller at all. It's technically true but essentially it is missing the point. Kind of like a cumulative graph.

[Anonymous No.58013868]

>>58013858
Chainlink's cumulative graph has literally never dipped. Up only from here. Cope.

[Anonymous No.58013886]

>>58013868
technically true.
oracles would agree.

but, for the sake of Sergey and his interest in philosophy, if yesterday the cumulative graph was $1.4 million, and today it's 400,000, didn't the cumulative graph dip?
it did.
but of course it didn't.
although it did.

truth by consensus anons. truth by consensus.

[Anonymous No.58013888]

>>58013858
doubles down on complete retardation
yep this is the best they got left

[Anonymous No.58013947]

>>58013886
>creates chart that is impossible to dump
>dumps
why is link like this?

[Anonymous No.58014146]

>>58013858
>i hold more link than you. longer than you
cringe. how old are you?

[Anonymous No.58014202]

Hello this is a big thread with a lot of interaction is the consensus that I should keep holding or sell?

[Anonymous No.58014228]

>>58006195
Wow! That's $0.0004 per shit!

[Anonymous No.58014295]

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA fucking losers did a campaign all over twitter about muhhh fake data and could only pump the price a dollar for a few hours

The few, the limp, THE Cuckolds of crypto

[Anonymous No.58014303]

>>58014295
thats cute lil fuddie

[Anonymous No.58014310]

>>58014202
imagine selling link before alt season lol

[Anonymous No.58014314]

>>58006918
>paying high fees = good
bearish and unsustainable
btc shitcoin always rugs after fees hit $50+

[Anonymous No.58014748]

>>58014314
>>paying high fees = good
The fees aren't high, but if it helps you cope, by all means think it

[Anonymous No.58014766]

>>58010365
Nope; that calculation was for the fully diluted market cap.

[Anonymous No.58015162]

i love seeing upset fudcucks in actual link discussion threads
every post they make is with the full knowledge that even after thousands of hours worth of experience at this point, their own threads are still just dumpster fires with no engagement and are usually only on life support from blatant fuddie samefagging

alllll that effort and you never convinced anyone to unstake or sell

cope seethe dilate you fuckin retarded brown fags LMAO

[Anonymous No.58015390]

>>58015162
is this fud or actual discussion >>58009757

[Anonymous No.58015421]

>>58006195
What does this have to do with Link?

[Anonymous No.58015512]

>>58015162
the chart tho

[Anonymous No.58015532]

>>58015390
reality = fud

[Anonymous No.58015555]

>>58015390
>>58015512
>>58015532
aww poor babies
don't worry, i'm sure you'll feel better if you tab back to your 30th fud thread of the day or whatever and reply to yourselves
just dont check the pool to see how full it is - it'll only upset you

[Anonymous No.58015574]

>>58009134
Dabbing on LINKcels never gets old.

[Anonymous No.58015590]

>>58015555
i bought link before you, i own more link than you, and i have 100% of my LINK staked in v0.2.

you want to talk about actual discussion? i spent my personal time writing a script to pull accurate data from the CCIP api and that is what i found. you have nothing to comment on it? just pointless rambling and namecalling?

really profound stuff anon

[Anonymous No.58015613]

>>58015590
>i'm a fellow OG and staker anon sirs pls for real im serious pls respond
didn't ask bro
feel free to keep crying though

[Anonymous No.58015632]

So glad I didn't buy this token lol

[Anonymous No.58015646]

>>58015555
>i i i'm not mad

i live in your head

[Anonymous No.58015649]

>>58015590
anon, thanks for doing it by the way.

was going to say something before but then the avocado types, in this thread, with their prompts just made me realise they were proper shilling so i left
see here >>58013888
here >>58013947
and here >>58014146


thanks for the work. informative stuff.

[Anonymous No.58015676]

>>58015613
>anything negative must be fudders making up lies!!!!

i miss old biz

[Anonymous No.58015689]

Behold: the current state of a link ambassador. The question is are they intentionally trying to deceive people or just that dumb?

[Anonymous No.58015711]

>>58015689
The trend is the same, keep seething faggot.

[Anonymous No.58015715]

>>58015646
>i live rent free in YOUR head linkie
>t. guy who sits on a dead board all day every day seething at linkies

>>58015676
yeah sorry for upsetting you lil guy
maybe consider touching grass or getting therapy?

[Anonymous No.58015745]

>>58015555
CHECKED
>>58000000
>>57999999
LINK gets all the digits. Fuddies seethe

[Anonymous No.58016302]

Didn't people find out the volume is spoofed from the same wallet or was that just fud?

[Anonymous No.58016356]

bump thread just so linkies get more upset realizing all the numbers were fabricated by the team in order to make it seem like CCIP was in demand

[Anonymous No.58016381]

Does anyone know which timezone Dune uses? Hard to gauge current daily total without knowing

[Anonymous No.58016407]

Also, has anyone else's ID changed itt? my last post has a different one. Has changed in last 8 hrs

[Anonymous No.58016469]

>>58016407
yeah, it did. i think we're being targeted by unknown forces for sharing good news about link.
that's so like demonic

[Anonymous No.58016479]

>>58007243
Cyber-techno machinations is for sure my favorite

[Anonymous No.58016491]

>>58015676
Coderanon, look closely at the structure of the response from the API:
‘allCCIPPublicTransactionsFlat’

>Public Transactions

This necessarily implies that there are private/nonpublic transactions - otherwise why wouldnt the CCIP developers call this object ‘AllCCIPTransactions’?
Really makes you think

[Anonymous No.58016558]

>>58006195
>CCIP
ITT, Link baggies. Sergay himself has said many times that Link is a utility token for CCIP. You are supposed to stake it for 6% APY. It is not designed to have monetary premium. Most baggies don't even know what CCIP is.

[Anonymous No.58016564]

>>58016491
good observation anon, i noticed the same thing when i first started writing this script

specifically, notice the query im passing is "query=LATEST_PUBLIC_TRANSACTIONS_QUERY". Interestingly, "LATEST_TRANSACTIONS_QUERY" is also a valid query to hit the api

when i first noticed this i was really fucking excited, but it turns out it doesn't actually contain anything that the PUBLIC query does not. was a let down, but at least chainlink labs isnt a bunch of amateur retards that would leak private CCIP data

[Anonymous No.58016583]

>>58016491
>>58016564
There is also no widespread adoption of this technology. PYTH on Solana is selling the same link tech at a fraction of the transaction price.

[Anonymous No.58016795]

>>58014295

[Anonymous No.58016938]

>>58016795
What gets me is the resemblance. It's so uncanny lol

[Anonymous No.58017042]

>>58015689
a cumulative chart isn't always vertical though

[Anonymous No.58017157]

>>58017042
Can someone who knows how to use charting software compile a graph of daily revenue that isn't cumulative, please? I'm a retard so it would take me about a week to figure out but surely someone knows how? It would be useful and resolve this stupid convo once and for all. It could be updated, too

[Anonymous No.58017254]

>>58015555
Checked fudcucks obliterated

[Anonymous No.58017275]

>>58017157
linkpool already provided the tools to do that, heres what that looks like

[Anonymous No.58017287]

>>58017275
but this doesnt really mean anything if the spike in use/fees is because of increased testing by chainlink labs, and not actual dApps using CCIP for legitimate reasons

[Anonymous No.58017300]

>>58016491
>>58016564
blockchains aren't private

[Anonymous No.58017410]

>>58017275
Thanks. I wish they'd include this when you land on the page. It's more useful than any of the other graphs.
>>58017287
do you have reason to believe that is the cause? if so, do you have some evidence?

[Anonymous No.58017424]

>>58016938
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if phrenology is a mainstream science again by 2100. People's faces really tell you who they are.

[Anonymous No.58017438]

>>58017275
right i see how you did it now but i have to signup. ok i'll do that later, thanks

[Anonymous No.58017457]

>>58017300
>blockchains aren't private
corda r3 is
take three guesses on what banks are building their inhouse chain
unless cll makes a data aggregator you will never see the details of this
and considering they havent made an aggregator yet means they never will since the banks want to stay hidden

[Anonymous No.58017477]

>>58017287
honestly its kind of useless to talk about ccip since it's still in testing phase

[Anonymous No.58017481]

And yet it still can't break ATH ouch. I hope you sell your heavy bags in december.

[Anonymous No.58017486]

>>58017300
you are incredibly stupid, please dont ever try to insert yourself into a lightly technical conversation ever again

>>58017410
yeah, see >>58009757


I pulled the data of the actual addresses making up the majority of CCIP use and 1 address dwarfs all of the others. It's not associated with any dApps and is a multichain address which has activity on every chain that chainlink supports - including Wemix. There is no dApp in existence, as far as im aware, that matches this profile.

Additionally, look at the transactions themselves that this address is submitting - all of them are just a message which, when decoded, says something like "new message with Id 2"

link to an example tx here: https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0xa6df10e1d2c34e2f33ce3274e9d7208896f1a5cbf0ab335523eddf421d95f96c

[Anonymous No.58017529]

>>58017486
oh also that address has recieved link directly from Noncirculating Supply wallets.

Which is even further indicative of it being a wallet used by chainlink labs for testing

[Anonymous No.58017585]

>>58017486
Thanks. Good to know. Let's just hope GA isn't far away

[Anonymous No.58017615]

>>58017585
>Let's just hope GA isn't far away

What do you think will happen if GA is released on Monday?

[Anonymous No.58017741]

>>58009134
>doubled in one month
This is still good lmao, why would anyone be upset

[Anonymous No.58017806]

Let's say that CCIP starts generating $5M in fees daily which would make for 1.8B in fees each year. Where does that revenue go and how it would pump my bags? Since those fees are to be paid in LINK it would just pump the price?

[Anonymous No.58017850]

>>58017615
I'll have a threesome with Swedish twins on Tuesday

[Anonymous No.58017913]

>>58017615
Oh linkies. They never learn do they

[Anonymous No.58018118]

>>58017477
But all the advocates are saying it's in mainnet

[Anonymous No.58018134]

Real link holder irl:

https://cubixedu.com/app/uploads/2023/09/dr_heltovics_ede.png

[Anonymous No.58018141]

>>58017806

This type of usage is what we're waiting on

https://docs.chain.link/ccip/billing

Link tokens used cover the gas fees and in addition, CCIP charges a percentage of the value of the tokens being transferred crosschain. There's a 10% premium for using the base chain's coin for the gas fee and and a higher percentage charge for transferring tokens without paying in Link. What should happen is that to optimize expenditures, users will look to purchase Link to take advantage of the savings in comparison to using some gas token (wrapped version of the blockchain coin). This will drive the value of the token up as it causes buy pressure. There's also CCIP converting the gas tokens into Link to pay the nodes, but I am not privy to where the liquidity to swap to Link comes from. Finally, there is the payment abstraction system coming up that should streamline all of the above and let people pay in whatever but the payment gets converted to Link at the end.


Honestly, we're super duper early with CCIP. People are still building and coming up with new ideas to leverage the infrastructure. A few months ago, we had a team release a token that was born cross chain as opposed to deploying an ERC-20 token on Ethereum or whatever. In other words, wait for the projects to release that make you say "WOW" at the new generation of dapps, Xapps. Then it'll be reflected in the price.

Unless the private CCIP network takes off first and that has its value reflected in the price.

[Anonymous No.58018171]

>>58018141
>Honestly, we're super duper early with CCIP. People are still building and coming up with new ideas to leverage the infrastructure
wow! 5 or 10 years and maybe it will be big! I hope Sergey announces the future outlook at SmartCon in seven months? Yepp!!!

[Anonymous No.58018193]

>>58018141
>Honestly, we're super duper early with CCIP.

Either you are having trouble with "honestly" or "super duper early". One of those is 100% untrue.

[Anonymous No.58018222]

>>58017806
Assuming 100% gets pumped into fully diluted market cap (i.e., the mcap in spite of sergey dumps), we will see $1.83 price increase per year. Now that assumption likely isn't valid, but if you account for the fact that
>$5M is a low estimate given what we're seeing now (just a 20x in daily revenue. Remember we're still testing now)
>people will buy the hype when CCIP starts pumping the coin
>CCIP is beans compared to the real use of LINK
This more than balances out.

[Anonymous No.58018659]

>>58017042
neither is this chart... after the next revision it might go flat

[Anonymous No.58018682]

>>58006753
Yeah cause that's how something is valued

[Anonymous No.58018699]

>>58017585
2 more weeks

>>58017615
you didn't ask me but I'm giving my opinion anyways as a PSA... when GA "releases" (in quotes bc surely it will be a limited version), Link price may go up a little, lets say a 5-10% pop. This will then sell of gradually throughout the following day, and after 3/4 days, you should expect price to be 5-25% lower than pre release. This will be attributed to conspiracies by the cult, but the reality will set in once people post metrics, that there was no one waiting to use general ackkkkkkcess.

[Anonymous No.58018707]

>>58007044
Nigga Ethereum makes like 2 - 2.5 million per day, based on that LINK is undervalued just from CCIP alone

[Anonymous No.58018718]

>>58018118
correct... when people complain it isn't fully released, the advocates correct you and say it's been out since '23. However when metrics don't add up to much, it's still just a test version. It's very versatile in that respect

[Anonymous No.58018730]

Is the CCIP FEE TRACKER MADE BY CHAINLINK LABS OR THE FUCKING SCAMMER JOHNNY ? fuck this big ass thread with fuckers fucking around fuck.

[Anonymous No.58018735]

>>58009134
OH NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.58018752]

>>58018730
Not CL, that's for sure.

[Anonymous No.58018784]

>>58018752
>Not CL, that's for sure.
thank you

[Anonymous No.58018808]

>>58006195

Someone explain to me wtf CCIP is??

[Anonymous No.58020139]

>>58018193
would it help you if I said "we're super duper early into the lifespan of CCIP"?

>>58018718
No it's literally out. They're testing it, but it's out all right now. The only difference between GA and now is that you won't need to be whitelisted to work on mainnet. That's virtually it.

[Anonymous No.58020900]

>>58020139
so it's out now, and nobody is using it.

but there will be super demand when they don't need to whitelist, right...

[Anonymous No.58021618]

>>58020139
>its out
>they're testing it!

You just described a beta. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.58021770]

>>58020900
why do you pretend to hate chainlink?

[Anonymous No.58021835]

>>58017486
>lightly technical
yes, that's all you're capable of, hence why you're a script kiddie and not a dev

[Anonymous No.58022440]

>>58021835
>hence why you're a script kiddie and not a dev
is this satire or is this guy really that cringe?

[Anonymous No.58022614]

>>58018808
>so uhh what if you want to like write a smart contract to buy a house with bitcorns?
>you cant do that man unless you use the thing that like, makes the bitcorn talk to the real estate business
>so yeah i think you should use your life savings to buy link

[Anonymous No.58022734]

>>58021618
I meant "they" as in developers. You still need to learn the tools and integrate it into your protocol and test to deal with any new vulnerabilities that pop up. There's a learning to curve to climb up here.

[Anonymous No.58022753]

>>58006300
this is a good analogy
chainlink should be ready for prime time in 10 to 12 years
good thing us linkmarines have nerves of steel. we will HODL the line until 2036! $1000 is preordained

[Anonymous No.58022881]

>>58022440
considering he had to beg real devs for help just to connect to their API, perhaps he shouldn't have rushed to dunk on them with his shitty chainanalysis

[Anonymous No.58023138]

>>58018808
No idea, but supposed to pump us to 22 bucks