CCIP crosses 1mil in revenue; 10% of cumulative revenues generated in the past 24 hours alone

[Anonymous No.57983660]

CCIP made $100,000 in the past 24 hours
It was at $900,000 yesterday and now it's at +1 mil
it's growing exponentially

this is literally Schmidt's hiding strategy unfolding in front of your eyes

>>>57974714
>be sure to make another thread when it actually crosses 1M.
>16 hours ago

it took less than 16 hours to btfo that fuddie lmao

[Anonymous No.57983718]

>>57983660
Cool why's the price action still garbage? I literally do not care about the tech I want to make money. Thoughts on missing your third bull run?

[Anonymous No.57983739]

it appears that they are ramping up testing and letting more and more partners try out ccip. I'm taking it as a sign that the general access launch is near. Fees yesterday were over $70k

[Anonymous No.57983822]

>>57983660
>>57983718
>>57983739
>*checks price*
>exactly where it was 4 years ago
revenue not needed
THE cuckolds of crypto

[Anonymous No.57983837]

>>57983718
>garbage

[Anonymous No.57983883]

The dashboard is faulty, please refrain from sharing it.

[Anonymous No.57983896]

there is a massive wave of bagholder cope, depression whining and fighting for LINK and more threads than usual. this normally happens around the bottom of a longer downtrend

[Anonymous No.57983934]

>>57983822

[Anonymous No.57983950]

>>57983837
nice cherry picking retard kek

[Anonymous No.57983962]

>>57983950
>nice cherry picking
>cherry picks in response
kek modern /biz/ in a nutshell

[Anonymous No.57983970]

>>57983660
It's earned $7k in the time since you posted that. Imagine the smell after GA happens and more and more comes online. I may wet my little shorts

[Anonymous No.57983975]

>>57983660
where is the link to the dashboard that shows the daily revenue i cant seem to find it any more
did eric just kill it?

[Anonymous No.57983984]

>>57983962
this is why I have a link bag

[Anonymous No.57984013]

>>57983660
Great, make another 2 threads already. In fact, make a thread every few thousand dollars.
Not enough link threads here

[Anonymous No.57984060]

>>57983975
https://dune.com/linkpool/chainlink-ccip
go down to the 'cumulative ccip fees USD' graph and the daily amounts are shown as you pass the cursor across it

[Anonymous No.57984158]

>>57984060
this is cumulatieve, i remember this graph being posted here from what i remember was erics dashboard that showed the real daily numbers
i mean yeah sure i can manually subtract 2 numbers but it doesnt display as nice
so is this older graph gone for good then?

[Anonymous No.57984197]

>>57983660
part of how this cuckcoin works is that revenue on their various systems will increase substantially while the token remains the same price and/or dumps, bleeding against bitcoin and the larger market, and missing every single bull run. It is part of the cuck psychology that the holders love, watching the company itself build tech that captures large amounts of revenue but watching their token literally do nothing at all, because it is made to financially dominate them and pay for roastie HR salaries, not to pump. congrats cucks, you guys are probably really happy right now in your cage, im proud of you.

[Anonymous No.57984240]

>>57984158
Shall we have a minute's silence?

[Anonymous No.57984245]

>>57983718
>I want to make money
>missing your third bullrun
This fucking jeetnigger just outed himself and nothing buta fuddie. Typical niggerfaggot.

[Anonymous No.57984288]

>>57984245
You are currently missing your third bullrun by holding LINK.

[Anonymous No.57984324]

>>57984197
>cuckcoin
>cuck
>dominate
>cucks
>cage
imagine teleporting into the mind of this creature and just taking a day or two to experience life on earth as it sees it.

[Anonymous No.57984516]

>>57983934
I created this and It’s so bad but so hilarious at the same time

[Anonymous No.57984634]

ok genuine question here.
we know that price gains based on FUNDAMENTAL value only (ie. excluding any speculation) hinges on CLLs pre-mined stash to run out so they can't subsidize the fees anymore and thus to pay the fees the protocols will have to actually buy LINK on the open-market. CLL themselves have laid out a timeline for when inflationary rewards (aka the pre-mined LINK holdings) will run out, which is in a few years. This timelime takes into account their belief that the Chainlink network will see enough usage at that point to be self-sustaining.
So my question is, IF for whatever reason CLL decides that they need to keep subsidizing rewards past that date, what's to stop them from increasing the LINK supply past 1billion? It's currently "hardcapped" but what disincentives/structural issues prevent them fron doing so?

[Anonymous No.57984645]

>>57983962
you had 14 years to buy BTC and 9 years to buy ETH
you missed the boat, shitcoiner

[Anonymous No.57984660]

>>57984645
Yeah I mean I started crypto in 2017 so I'm just doing the best that I can nah mean but full credit to ETH and BTC OGs they're all retired by now, hopefully I can join them in a few years.

[Anonymous No.57984678]

>>57983970
If a company wants to deploy their protocol on mainnet with CCIP integrate, they can contact Chainlink to get whitelisted right now.

General Access isn't going to change the price. Usage does.

[Anonymous No.57984695]

>>57984634
this is a good point. Also, they will drag it out longer than two years because after two years they will have nothing to release still, so they will just slowly decrease the dumps and the bleed will slow down. Probably in more like 20 years will there ever be the possibility that funds will have run out, and by then the company will be so dead that nothing matters anyway.

[Anonymous No.57984716]

>>57984678
DING DING DING, finally someone who gets it lmao.

[Anonymous No.57984782]

>>57983660
>>57983718
>>57983739
>>57983822
>>57983822
>>57983837
>>57983837
>>57983883
>>57983896
>>57983934
>>57983950
>>57983970
>>57983975
>>57983984
>>57984013
>>57984060
>>57984158
>>57984197
>>57984240
>>57984245
>>57984288
>>57984516
>>57984634
>>57984645
>>57984660
>>57984695
>>57984716
Sergey owns 50% of the supply and dumps aggressively, the token will reach top 5 but still be $20 because he's just dumping billions.

Other projects like AVAX have inflation from unlocks/staking. They don't have literal market dumps from the CEO with 50% of the supply unlocked in his wallet.

[Anonymous No.57984930]

>>57983660
it's funny the peace this place allows you to achieve if you can subject yourself to the ocean of piss long enough. there's gold down here, and not all of it is just because of the color imparted to it by the dehydrated piss you have to swim through to find it. thank god i found this place before the internet jumped the shark and before LINK became popular. the screeching, seething nulinkers that fud to the best of their extremely limited ability are just entertainment while i wait now, whereas if i didn't already have several makeit stacks they may actually be frustrating.

[Anonymous No.57985014]

>>57984930
You're down 90% vs ETH, 99% vs Sol in the last 4 years. You've lost your youth waiting for Sergey to stop dumping

[Anonymous No.57985037]

>>57983660
basado
https://dune.com/linkpool/chainlink-ccip
https://dune.com/linkpool/chainlink-revenue
pool's closed
kek fuddies
pay up
dr;ns

[Anonymous No.57985046]

>>57983950
>starting point before link and eth were created
how's your low IQ going?

[Anonymous No.57985089]

>>57985014
>>57984782
look at this tranny, assuming that i'm like him and that i jumped on this bandwagon after it started rolling. look at him talking about *other* people losing their youth making 30x in 6 years while he screams at them that they must be as unhappy as he is. so obsessed with cuckoldry that he projects his ultimate fantasy onto others.

fud some more for me, keep goin! i'll check back after having lunch with my wife and youngest child to see how you did! you can do it, little guy!

[Anonymous No.57985094]

>>57983660
I wanted to add OP, be sure to put the price of the link token each time you make these threads updating on cumulative revenue. It would be super interesting to see the actual price of the shitcoin along side the revenue. Thanks!

[Anonymous No.57985116]

>>57985094
You can do that yourself, anon, you can make your own threads on /biz/ whenever you want.

[Anonymous No.57985127]

>>57985037
>>57985014
>>57983660
But seriously though, why isn’t this getting reflected on the price? I’m not trying to fud here. I just want my money l.

[Anonymous No.57985133]

>>57984634
well that would be the nightmare scenario ultimate betrayal wouldnt it
i dont think there is anything stopping them from doing so if all the nodes follow along and they dont really have a reason not to as they get subsidized

[Anonymous No.57985134]

>>57983950
YOU LEAVE HIS PRISTINE ASSHOLE ALONE. IT WAS BEAUTIFUL BEFORE YOU RAPED IT UP

[Anonymous No.57985170]

>>57985127
because the network is being fully subsidized and will be for the next several decades, at which point it will have bled so much in sats and USD that you would be better off parking your money in literally anything else. Link will not even keep up with inflation over the next several decades. it will trend towards ico level prices as it serves zero purpose. It doesnt matter how much revenue CLL produces. Don't believe me? Look at the revenue and the chart. There is now enough data to show a correlation. Revenue goes up, price crabs/bleeds/goes down.

[Anonymous No.57985228]

>>57985170
>subsidized
Opinion disregarded

[Anonymous No.57985241]

>>57985046
>reeee not fair mommyyy
is this better, sweetie?

[Anonymous No.57985267]

>>57985241
Yes but

[Anonymous No.57985283]

>>57985267
kek are you a bot?

[Anonymous No.57985406]

>>57985283
..no?

[Anonymous No.57985499]

>>57983660
>10% of cumulative revenues generated in the past 24 hours alone
Why? Is it that Korean MMO they were talking about yesterday?

[Anonymous No.57985737]

>>57984634
>IF for whatever reason CLL decides that they need to keep subsidizing rewards past that date, what's to stop them from increasing the LINK supply past 1billion?


Nothing, they have no real physical address, You could bitch to the Caymen Island Gov, but they'll tell you to fuck off. Back to your question, they can do whatever they want, they are not beholden to any share holder laws, really any laws unless they piss off the US GOV, then it's over.

[Anonymous No.57986254]

>>57984634
>hinges on CLLs pre-mined stash to run out so they can't subsidize the fees
Chainlink don't subsidise the nodes for everything though. CCIP usage will be paid for by whomever is using it. The amount this will generate is likely to be vast.
https://docs.chain.link/ccip/billing
and
https://docs.chain.link/chainlink-automation/overview/automation-economics

[Anonymous No.57986286]

>>57985737
>Nothing
Well whales/corporates holding large bags of link would probably react violently to the supply adding another half a billion, that's not nothing.

[Anonymous No.57986292]

>>57983660
https://dune.com/queries/3295297/5526287

Why is this one $300M?

[Anonymous No.57986332]

>>57983660
Isn't it a false positive?
Why is no one posting a link to the dashboard and to the transactions which caused this?

[Anonymous No.57986335]

>>57983718
this
heres an old meme to show im not a 2021 bagholder
i am sick and tired of this fucking project

[Anonymous No.57986446]

>>57986292
That one's total revenue across all products, the vast majority of which is price feeds.

[Anonymous No.57986723]

>>57984197
corrrect... here's one of the biggest advocates conceding yesterday there is no token increase even within medium term range.

[Anonymous No.57986792]

>>57984324
Cope baggie

[Anonymous No.57986820]

>>57983660
>-1.37%

[Anonymous No.57986958]

>>57983660
this is fake dumbass when will people realize dune exaggerates data so more people will use them?

[Anonymous No.57987096]

nice now someone make a dune board of the node operators depositing those fees straight into Binance

[Anonymous No.57987622]

Adem seething in the thread lmao

[Anonymous No.57988277]

>>57984634
I don't know man.

[Anonymous No.57988525]

>>57984634
>what is blockchain
>what is immutability
if this is the next fud line it would be amazing though