No way this retard wins

[Anonymous No.57664021]

Trump will die in prison.

Invest accordingly…

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sdaS3TJ6Vk0&pp=ygUccGV0ZXIgemVpaGFuIHRydW1wIGNhbid0IHdpbg%3D%3D

>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/19/trump-must-pay-half-a-billion-dollars-before-he-can-appeal-new-york-decision/

[Anonymous No.57664048]

>>57664021
Trump brought this on himself. If that faggot actually drained the swamp and didn’t surround himself with Jews he wouldn’t be in this position. Jew cuck

[Anonymous No.57664071]

>>57664048
Cool it with the antisemitism.

Trump will go to jail, no doubt about it.

It is because he is a crooked criminal who tried to steal an election and because he raped a women and lied about it.

Now fuck off to /pol/

[Anonymous No.57664349]

>>57664021
The lunatic satanic death cult is out of control.
Obiden and cronies are guilty of crimes 1000 times worse than any B.S. charges they're hitting trump with.

any idiots celebtrating this are satans minions or fools dancing their way to the slaughter

[Anonymous No.57664387]

>>57664021
the shitlibs have lost the plot. the lawfare on Trump is so over the top that it is undermining systems that these same shitlibs stand on top of. What's their gameplan?

[Anonymous No.57664390]

>>57664387
You just stated it
>undermining systems

[Anonymous No.57664485]

>>57664021
>>57664048
You have less than one year.

[Anonymous No.57664490]

first time since 2004 I've had enough time to really dig into the election and it's a Trump-Biden joke...they really couldn't find anyone else?

[Anonymous No.57664534]

>>57664021
>>57664048
>>57664071
Reminder that these anti-Trump posters are coming from government-funded NGO shill farms. Watch this interview with the former head of cyber operations at the US State Department to see how they operate:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRYSKaS-XtQ

[Anonymous No.57664541]

>>57664534
Patriots are in control. Jews are based. I love Israel. I will marry my daughter to a Jew just like Trump.

[Anonymous No.57664545]

>>57664387
Or, everyone was right and he is a crook…

[Anonymous No.57664560]

>>57664541
You're literally posting from a government funded shill farm. The e US federal government is the enemy of democracy.

[Anonymous No.57664578]

>>57664490
>muh alternatives
Just vote for the stooge you like. Don't you know it is the most important responsibility of free citizens in free democracies.

[Anonymous No.57664599]

if that happens, then the migrant crisis is going to explode. Imagine what a coin like MIGRANT would do if that happened

[El Arcón No.57664770]

Fuck him, I hope he burns in hell with his family. That's the guy from the meeting at Exide in December 2016 in the OP pic, if I'm not mistaken.

[El Arcón No.57664774]

>>57664770
"was" ID. That was him. I hope he burns with his family.

[Anonymous No.57664782]

>>57664021
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences

[Anonymous No.57665151]

migrant inu is mooning

[Anonymous No.57665158]

>>57664021
Have you seen the retard he is running against?

[Anonymous No.57665201]

>>57664021
Trump lost. Don't invest in him

[Anonymous No.57665211]

>>57664048
>drain the swamp
mfw some people actually believed this bullshit

[Anonymous No.57665219]

>>57664782
>Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences

[Anonymous No.57665246]

>>57664782
No one has ever restricted free speech if this is the barometer.

[Anonymous No.57665269]

>>57665246
No one except pretty much all big tech platforms.

[Anonymous No.57665303]

>>57665269
They didn't stop anyone from speaking, they just banned their accounts. We have never considered imprisonment or the death penalty to be restrictions on free speech.

[Anonymous No.57665330]

>>57665303
Here's the problem: as soon as a public website starts editorializing its content based on political leanings (as big tech did), that platform legally becomes the publisher of all the content posted on there, meaning they become directly responsible and liable for ALL content posted on that website.
Look up section 230.

Big tech platforms engaged in all kinds of editorializing, curating, censoring, ... but they never lost their section 230 protections.

[Anonymous No.57665344]

>>57665303
>We have never considered imprisonment or the death penalty to be restrictions on free speech.
If the imprisonment or death penalty is the punishment for speech, then yes we have. Obviously.

[Anonymous No.57665349]

>>57664071
shitty bait

[Anonymous No.57665356]

>>57664048
Shrek would drain a swamp quicker than this corrupt tub o shit

[Anonymous No.57665424]

>>57665344
I agree, but we are starting this thought journey with the operating assumption that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences for that speech.
I disagree with that statement, and all of this is to show how ridiculous that statement is.
If you are dishing out consequences for speech then you have not afforded free speech.
However, if you say that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences for speaking, then you cannot find an inarguable example where speech has ever been restricted.

[Anonymous No.57665428]

>>57665330
If that is true, then it is the tech platform that is speaking and not its users. The users are on par with reporters, and are therefore similar to employees.

[Anonymous No.57665453]

>>57665424
>the operating assumption that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences for that speech.
When people say this, they are referring to the reactions of non-governmental entities to free speech.
e.g. you call someone a faggot and they punch you for it. Or you say "Hunter Biden laptop is real" and you get banned from twitter.

In almost all cases, the reaction itself is LEGALLY objectionable, while the original speech is not (or should not be).

>>57665428
>then it is the tech platform that is speaking and not its users
This is exactly what should have happened after big tech started censoring the right: the platforms themselves should've been transformed from "platforms" to "publishers".
But it never happened.

[Anonymous No.57665485]

>>57664578
Casual blackpilling like this is the most insidious, anti American, 5th columnist bullshit. Our institutions work. We are the envy of the globe. Every time you say dumb shit like this we get a little weaker bland our rivals get a little stronger

[Anonymous No.57665493]

>>57665453
>When people say this, they are referring to the reactions of non-governmental entities to free speech.
If a government has no authority to hand out punishment, then what authority does some random asshole with zero legitimacy to rule have? A punishing authority must have legitimacy derived either through law (i.e. a citizen's right to uphold existing law) or through some other vehicle such as holding an elected office or appointment to an office by a governing authority.
Punching someone in the face in a situation where self-defense is not warranted is against the law. It is assault and battery, and that is inarguable.

[Anonymous No.57665497]

>>57665493
>Punching someone in the face in a situation where self-defense is not warranted is against the law. It is assault and battery
That's what I said.

[Anonymous No.57665502]

>>57665453
>the platforms themselves should've been transformed from "platforms" to "publishers".
I agree wholeheartedly, and I think the push to make this happen should be relentless and persistent regardless of momentary failure to realize the goal.

[Anonymous No.57665508]

>>57665497
OIC.

[Anonymous No.57665948]

>>57664782

[Anonymous No.57666012]

>>57664021
He's a jew worshiping boomer. He's better off as a martyr than leading any movement. Please gulag him so we can focus our cause against you.

[Anonymous No.57666019]

>>57664021
>>57664048
You are both high, NYC just slit it's own throat.

>We are hemorrhaging money.
>I know lets scare away all the real-estate developers and triple taxes on existing businesses.

This is what happens when niggers are running things.