/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.57611436]

>citibank and dtcc abandons chainlink in a week
Seriously what the fuck is going on?

[Anonymous No.57611564]

>>57611436
>+8.4%

[Anonymous No.57611574]

>>57611436
It's over, should've bought AVAX

[Anonymous No.57611649]

>>57611436
where is that news?

[Anonymous No.57611720]

>>57611649
There were threads about it today and yesterday you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.57611738]

oh shit the staking pool is also 50% empty omg

[Anonymous No.57611757]

>>57611738
You’re not funny

[Anonymous No.57611792]

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE POOLS CLOSED HA HA HA

[Anonymous No.57611968]

>>57611436
no proof of this
they are trying to shake people out

[Anonymous No.57611988]

>>57611720
the threads didn't say they were abandoning chainlink, they said they were abandoning blockchain

[Anonymous No.57612005]

>>57611988
Same thing
>>57611968
Search the board retard

[Anonymous No.57612047]

staking is a customer retention program and a good one at that. anons really liked it when the number on the webpage goes up. it's a chap and easy feature, essentially a piggy bank for long term token customers

[Anonymous No.57612059]

>>57612005
>SeARch tHe BoArd ReTaRD
Buy an ad

[Anonymous No.57612076]

>>57612059
>>57595136
>>57609610
You stupid motherfucker

[Anonymous No.57612153]

>>57612059
Buy LPL
>pools closed
oh.

>>57612076
LATEST NO LPL POOLER COPE JUST DROPPED BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE

POOLS CLOSED LPL

LPL BASED CHUDDIE KIDDOS STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDOS PILLED

SEETHE

LPL

HUH?

LPL

HUH????

[Anonymous No.57612157]

>>57612076
oh so they are not abandoning, thanks bought more

[Anonymous No.57612160]

>>57612076
>woman opinion

[Anonymous No.57612199]

>>57611564
Link partners with DTCC, Google, Eric Schmidt, jesus christ, every big bank on earth.
>-4.7%

Link partners with the power rangers and the token is revealed to truly not be needed
>+17%

[Anonymous No.57612200]

>>57612157
and what about ... LPL...?

[Anonymous No.57612253]

>>57611968
>shake people out
how can they shake anyone out when they are staked

[Anonymous No.57612301]

>>57612253
BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDO CHUDDIE POOLS CLOSED

[Anonymous No.57612406]

>>57611436
>>57611720
He thought the reverse fud was fud, embarrassing

[Anonymous No.57612628]

>>57611436
Open questions for any anons to answer:
What are the odds posts like this aren't astroturfed? As in, why is it that ctrl+f "chainlink" 0 results only applies to bullish news, but vague abstract comments from DTCC such as DLT being too immature a technology for widespread short-term adoption, or separate developments that don't suggest anything impeding ongoing collaboration with CL in any way, are such light-blaring causes to sell?

I just checked the catalog archive and searched "link" and literally dozens of threads are in there, all negative, all singing from the same songbook. All this negativity in the ranks after months of green and a 3x in LINK dominance. Now here we have a meta thread to discuss the other threads. The others weren't enough of course, let's make sure we have something up front in the catalog at all times, so let's have both the threads themselves then other ones to discuss them again. How, after all this time and by their own argument the irredeemable onslaught of terrible death knells for Chainlink, are there still leagues of dejected "OGs" who have not sold, stalking biz, ever-ready to remind us all that our investment - their investment - has underperformed since late 2020 and otherwise as fastened as ever to their commitment to posting fud from wall to wall?

Just some fun questions.

[Anonymous No.57612737]

>>57611436

[Anonymous No.57612774]

>>57612628
it's either a global conspiracy or anons being bored while taking a shit

[Anonymous No.57612825]

>>57612406
It’s not a reverse fud you dense imbecile

[Anonymous No.57612852]

>+0.2%
KEK bleeding sats. Get ready to miss another bullrun marines

[Anonymous No.57613069]

>>57611436
>Seriously what the fuck is going on?
They started doing calculations as to how much its going to cost them. Similar to ETH and BTC, it turns out that having an unnecessary class of stakers/miners/validators all looking for their cut and being as greedy as possible makes things ridiculously expensive. Tradfi was always going to go with centralised solutions, they're not going to 'pay up' when there are far cheaper alternatives sprouting up every day.

[Anonymous No.57613174]

>>57611436
>the top financial entities will use an open source middleware backed by nazi frogs
...uhh..yeah....nothing wrong with that...

[Anonymous No.57613253]

>>57612628

They are not OGs, They are what we used to call Swingies

They will get the rope

[Anonymous No.57613266]

>>57612825
>>57612852
>>57613069
>>57613174

ITS MORNING IN MUMBAI

HOLY SHIT KIDS

[Anonymous No.57613320]

>>57612774
I think you're naive about how sentiment is engineered in immature markets. Chainlink itself has done it, most obviously in 2017-18 to raise capital, and probably still does to some extent. I'm not discounting some organic baseline, but most often the motives or the line of argument or the facts do not line up and the actual volume of fud even after months of green is ridiculous. You're the only one talking about a "global conspiracy" you fucking peanut.

[Anonymous No.57613334]

>>57613253
That's why I put OG in quotes, dunce, to demonstrate how they pose as OGs but their takes don't add up.
Is literally everyone here a retard or what?

[Anonymous No.57613393]

>>57612825
How's the weather in India, Savindu?

[sage No.57613401]

>>57612825
Hi jeet.

Never selling.

$30 by March 1st.

[Anonymous No.57613989]

>>57613069
Clearly you have not heard of ICP.

[Anonymous No.57614032]

>>57611436
The funniest thing are the link shills. "iT hAs nOtHiNg tO Do WiTh ChAiNlInK"

Yea sure...

[Anonymous No.57614068]

>>57611436
Yes, chainlink is abandoned sell your bags now before their worthless. Pool is still full btw.

[Anonymous No.57614069]

>>57611436
>>57611574
>>57611720
>>57612005
>>57612076
>>57612825
>>57612852
>>57613069
>>57613174
>>57614032
Pool’s closed.

[Anonymous No.57614081]

>>57614069
And Chainlink is below $20

[Anonymous No.57615656]

>>57614081
no its not

[Anonymous No.57615696]

I am the RWA coin now, should have kept building properly instead of writing science fiction books. Emin was kind enough to write a nice comment on the book though!

[Anonymous No.57615705]

>>57611574
literally tho.

[Anonymous No.57615753]

>>57611988
>they said they were abandoning blockchain
lmao they said the opposite

[Anonymous No.57615980]

>>57611720
>no source
Try again

[Anonymous No.57616012]

>>57612628
good questions and observations anon

[Anonymous No.57616047]

>>57611720
You didn't read those threads

[Anonymous No.57616203]

>>57612628
anon, it's very much astro-turfed. fuddies and avocados.
avocados take a comment made by an anon in earnest and redirect the conversation, usually by saying you're from the subcontinent, or asking when was the last time you had sex, or saying that link has broken out of its range. fuddies paint a negative picture but the very fact they are still here trying to paint says more than they ever realise.
it's a thin line between love and hate.
indifference would be the death knell.
but they're still here posting.

the reality is pretty much straightforward.
link is the best bet in the market but its price action remains disappointing.
it can't break its sats range.
although adoption is closer everyday and the news is regularly good, it still hasn't 'really' been adopted and until it is there's always the possibility, as reflected in the price, that it might not ever be. i find that unlikely, but it remains a possibility. regulatory clarity will help with all of that but there are parties who will try to prevent that regulatory clarity. on top of that, ccip still isn't here and 2022, 2023 and now 6 weeks of 2024 have passed. this isn't my first rodeo and i'm never selling, i know it's a big project on the way to doing huge things. i'm genuinely impressed. but are the posts astroturfed? very obviously.

[Anonymous No.57617403]

>>57612628
yeah they're astroturfed. most of the internet, including this board, is a sophisticated attention management system. it's the dead internet's final form.

[Anonymous No.57617854]

>>57612628
Bumping this high IQ post.