/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.57294776]

>Another red day for my icypee

[Anonymous No.57295391]

Buy more anon. Red means buy

[Anonymous No.57295394]

>>57294776
AAAAAAHHAH
INTERNET COMPUTER

[Anonymous No.57295396]

>>57295391
>Red means buy

[Anonymous No.57295426]

>>57295396
Get it while it’s cheap.

[Anonymous No.57295458]

>>57295396
*slurps*

[Anonymous No.57295468]

>>57294776
Anon I hate to break it to you but ICP isn't special at all, it pumps along with all the other "smart alts" like GRT, filecoin, Rose etc

There's no actual adoption driving it. GRT is up more than it is.

[Anonymous No.57295493]

You left your pee in this sauna. It's getting awfully misty in here.

[Anonymous No.57295567]

>>57295468
Or for even a better understanding. Fucking Parsiq, is up and has a similar but better graph than ICP. Cmc it lol

And its straight up last cycles shitcoin

Icp tech isn't bad, but it has zero adoption and is following the alt cycle. Don't expect ICP tech to do anything until 2025-2026

[Anonymous No.57295737]

>>57295396
i bought my first pees for over $400 now im 25% in profit red means buy

[Anonymous No.57295738]

>>57295567
>>57295468
Source?

[Anonymous No.57295764]

>>57294776
You should see a doctor if your icypee is red

[Anonymous No.57295804]

>>57294776
Lol pissheads. Meanwhile LINK is going pumping

[Anonymous No.57295835]

>>57294776
everybody knows it's a kike scamcoin and you keep buying it, people keep saying that in twitter, telegram and beoble but you guys can't listen

[Anonymous No.57296119]

>>57295835
Billy id

[Anonymous No.57296193]

>>57295835
What's with this chatgpt bot shilling b*oble?

[Anonymous No.57296441]

>>57294776
Every day, multiple times a day, we have samefagging Kadena trannies shitting up biz with their insane, literally, anti-ICP threads. They do this because an ICP investor, PhD, exposed their shit vaporware tech, so the price crashed. They have hated him and ICP ever since. As they have no life, they spend every hour fudding ICP and they worst part is that one of the senior mods are one of them and protect them. No wonder biz has crashed so hard after Kadena trannies came here two years ago.

[Anonymous No.57296680]

I hold icp, kel tec and frozen urine.

[Anonymous No.57296928]

>>57295738
Cmc lol

Go look at the GRT graph and compare and contrast to ROSE or Parsiq or literally any other "utility token" its all the same pump. Nothing is happening, im sorry to be the one to tell yall, but ICP isn't being adopted, it's being played just like the other utility tokens by the same exact people placing the buys and the sells, not actual adoption

You shouldn't ask for the source instead actually go look at cmc for the top 50 coins and compare and contrast. And understand why SOL 10xed and ICP 3xd with the rest of the coins.

ICP frens are just loudest, but the use case argument isn't there. We're a literal decade away from crypto utility. The real money makers right now are BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, and honestly long term it's ICP and GRT and ROSE, but that's 2030+ fren.

[Anonymous No.57297112]

>>57296928
Didn't read

[Anonymous No.57298586]

>>57296441
Hi. I am not sure who you are talking about, assuming this is me, thank you for supporting the weak. But I was a small aspiring smart-contract / game developer, without PhD nor funds to invest. I doubt KDA price went down because of the criticism of mine, rather Kadena team simply sold profiteering on their early investors. I have cPTSD so I don't read /biz/, narcissistic alligators are always on lookout to cram me back down in cycles of abuse with bold inversion attacks and ridiculously specious pseudo-affective manipulations, exploiting the fact I have no social skills, no drive for self-advocacy, no support network, etc. Unfortunately, they piggyback influential financial and cultural power structures, they know how to get away with machiavellianism. It's better to distance ourselves from them as much as possible, ignoring them as long as they have no interest in genuine kindness.

[Anonymous No.57298739]

>>57298586
No, I am talking about database-anon. I believe you changed your mind and was previously part of the KDA team on /biz/, but good for you standing up for the weak and truth, anon.

[Anonymous No.57298743]

>>57298586
I wish you much happiness and good health in your life.

[Anonymous No.57298758]

>>57296441
Those are roaches

[Anonymous No.57298882]

Sorry, these events have made me paranoid and self-protective. I used to have autism-induced cognitive blocks about technologies on Kadena, I wasn’t sure if this was related. Although I never supported any crypto project. In the past I just wanted to make a small comfortable game, independently of substrate.

https://archived.moe/biz/thread/47152653/#47160455
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/49087967/#49090942
(Sorry for cringe past)

>>57298743
Thank you. You too.

[Anonymous No.57299046]

>>57294776
could be kidney stones

[Anonymous No.57299226]

>>57298882
Be blessed and healed, fren. May your life be filled with hapiness and joy.

[Anonymous No.57299280]

>>57299226
Thank you. Sorry this environment stresses me out. In >>57298882 I meant to quote >>57298739

Intuitively, Chainweb is a probabilistically-partitioning variant of big block scaling. In both context, data structures are topologically identical with respect to undifferentiated DAGs between block references and Merkle subgraph. Network participants are required to validate state graph in entirety to ensure correctness, according to architects themselves [1] (if not, attacks based on invalid block may stall network or waste significant hash power), besides superfluous addition of highly inefficient cross-chain messaging and redundant proofs equivalent to standard recursive audits on Merkle substructures. Nonetheless, implicit introduction of transactional friction in shard space improve distribution multidimensional activity heat but practical upsides are limited due to inflexible Peterson-like layout and storage cost triviality, unlike generalized memory partitioning based on latent-space, distance fields, and parallelisation-incentivising heat maps (all right reserved). Increased hashrate sampling is the sole predicator of theoretical selfish mining resistance curvature improvement [2], and is fully achievable under single-headed chains roughly with flexible probabilistic combinations of work proofs (e.g. allowing multiple actor-linked PoW per block rather than one). Kadena LLC owns a significant fraction of platform tokens for any relevant foreseeable time interval, including allocations and early logarithmic rewards semantically stretching definitions surrounding financial securities [3]. Eventual market target is inconsistent and poorly optimized, recursive ZKP will save Bitcoin before it saves Kadena and former monopolizes trust in PoW.

[1] https://twitter.com/_wjmartino_/status/1471481655353384960
[2] http://www.ece.iit.edu/~yucheng/YCheng_PST22.pdf
[3] https://medium.com/@kdadd/transparency-of-centralized-kadena-token-allocations-e1dfe65e8833

[Anonymous No.57299408]

Pact Core is what Tezos Michelson has been for years. Wait until Kadenya devs realize dilutive PoS is SOTA (i.e. Dfinity and soon Tezos with adaptive inflation). Alephium's shards are nonsensical, and Proof-of-Less-Work erroneously assumes economical differences between payback and reduced rewards. This is honestly a dumb idea. Fortunately, I am more dumb than them since I've investigated the possibility of recursive Proof-of-Burn in the past (discarding PoW fully for reflexive self-contained economical incentives). https://archived.moe/biz/thread/42171979/#42202318

Criticism of PoW
>>/biz/thread/54331500#p54335009
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3942181
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3559894
https://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/7104/1/WEIS_2019_paper_30.pdf
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Trend-of-centralization-in-Bitcoin's-distributed-Beikverdi-Song/469072daa94eff4a9ea88c7f828cbdf1269768dd
https://hashrateindex.com/blog/analyzing-the-merger-between-hut-8-and-us-bitcoin/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921344921005103
https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0243
https://youtu.be/u-sNSjS8cq0

Oh and, category theory is narcissistic rebranding of set theory, formally.

[Anonymous No.57299456]

>>57299280
>>57299408
What does this have to do with icp?

[Anonymous No.57299507]

never too late to swap for kaspa anon. rango will make it quick and easy. i know itll be hard for you since you people clearly married this token for... some reason, but a part of love is letting go :^(

[Anonymous No.57299915]

>>57299507
>please buy my bags after they pulled a 1000x
fuck you anon