If all these e-celebs are TA geniuses with chad market insights

[Anonymous No.56850369]

Why aren't they billionaires making uber commissions and salaries managing hedge funds for JPM, Morgan Stanley, Goldman, Wells Fargo???

I don't understand it, anon?

[Anonymous No.56850384]

>>56850369
yes

[Anonymous No.56850396]

>>56850369
They are just insiders like Wall Street is. That’s all it is information asymmetry

[Anonymous No.56850469]

>>56850369
>if these e-celebs are TA geniuses
They're not. They're paid shills. The TA geniuses are on /biz/. Nowhere else.

[Anonymous No.56850984]

>>56850369
They're gamblers, shills, and shitposters. Until recently they were making ad revenue money from x but that is over.

[Anonymous No.56851000]

>>56850369
grifters, all of them. Remember to use my referral since I'm not profitable at all actually

[Anonymous No.56851539]

>>56850469
twitter?

[Anonymous No.56851625]

>>56850469
>The TA geniuses are on /biz/
>like and subscribe to my TA thread
Fuck off fag

[Anonymous No.56851636]

>>56850369
It's a matter of scale.
They're only successful if they're limited in the money they sling around.

[Anonymous No.56851694]

>>56851636
Is it enough to quit your day job?

[Anonymous No.56851851]

>>56850369
1. Speed: You can't compete with institutional order-to-execution time. (their trading infrastructure is highly networked/computerized, so they receive market data quicker and react even faster) 2. Volume: You can't compete with institutional order sizing (they have enormous market control, and can almost easily influence price movements)

[Anonymous No.56852180]

>>56850369
you do understand it, they're just scammers

[Anonymous No.56852428]

>>56851625
>t. seething low IQer

[Anonymous No.56853593]

>>56850369
i work for one of those institutions. its all sales and all retards.