good faith LINK stake discussion

[Anonymous No.56794114]

I’m priority access but hesitant to stake a significant amount. The 28-day cooldown just screams missing the top and watching powerlessly as the whole market comes crashing down 50% before you can get out. However the BUILD rewards are enticing and I can of course just sell all my rewards and play it conservatively, but desu I can’t afford to roundtrip again. Very torn between staking half my stack or ignoring it entirely and dumping between $150 and $250.

[Anonymous No.56794244]

Im just not gonna stake.
5% and some nft scam shitcoins are a pittance compared to selling on a parabolic run.
A 1k stack fag who sold at a good time ended up with more link than all the 10k stack fags who sat on their hands.
Im not gonna baghold -90% again.
Lets be real staking completely incentivizes missing the top.
30 days is a long time, and once link reaches $100 there will be no euphoric stakers rushing to unstake. We will get greedy again and start looking at muh temporary passive income staking gains. Except crypto is immature and lives by boom and bust cycles, by the time the greed wears off and fear sets in, it will already be too late again. I remember when we all said it was too late to sell when link crashed to $20-$10.
Another missed bull run.
In crypto, getting to a high valuation is not the hard part, the hard part is actually keeping it and locking in concrete profits.
Link reaching $50 last bullrun is completely meaningless when practically none of us even made any tangible money from it.
I know in my heart that if I stake i will miss another bullrun and im getting too old for that.

[Anonymous No.56794265]

[Anonymous No.56794268]

>>56794114
put your LINK in stake.link priority pool and have it swapped for stLINK, which has 5.11% apy, its liquid you can get your LINK back straight away to sell and you get Build rewards, also no ramp up period

[Anonymous No.56794274]

>>56794114
Imagine buying risky, grey market shitcoins that are illegal securities in the US and which can be rugpulled any minute or named by the SEC literally any day, ALL THAT just TO EARN FUCKING BANK INTEREST, when that money could be earning interest in an FDIC insured legitimate bank with a real assets, a real address and real people that diligently get out of bed in the morning, put on a proper suit and show up on time instead of some overseas, SEC-dodging fat fuck and his remote "working" entourage.

[Anonymous No.56794288]

>>56794265
lel
Serious bantz on X.

[Anonymous No.56794291]

>>56794114
>The 28-day cooldown just screams missing the top

desu you shouldn't be waiting till the last moment to sell, you should be taking profits ahead of time. lastly, the mega dump doesn't happen all in one day.

though at the end of the day, i'm with you. im not staking. not worth it to me. i'm all in on LINK, but i'm not a cultist. i'm just here for a flip. targeting $100, which is when i'll start taking profits for now, may do it sooner if the environment at the time calls for it.

[Anonymous No.56794621]

>>56794114
stake.link is liquid staking

[Anonymous No.56794688]

>>56794621
>SDL team rugs liquidity buffer and now your liquid stLINK isn't so liquid
thanks for playing!

[Anonymous No.56794690]

>>56794114
What makes you think it will hit 100 let alone 150? Honest question.

[Anonymous No.56794695]

I'm a legitimate mid 7 figure crypto trader. I have never once staked any crypto. I made millions with ETH, and then turned that into millions in SOL, ADA, SHIB and MATIC. I did sell LINK at $35, but would never stake. The goal of crypto is to multiply your money. If you bought and staked LINK in 2021 or 2020, you'd be ready to jump because of how poor it performed in the bull run. ETH went from $300 to $4000, that movement is worth infinitely more than staking for gov't shitcoin treasury yields

Also, something tells me the BUILD rewards will require KYC and a 100-200 day unlock, or something retarded like that. Make your money and get the fuck out

[Anonymous No.56794709]

>>56794695
Thanks gonna stake 20k LINK

[Anonymous No.56794727]

>>56794709
Hey you do you my man. You are telling us you once had $1,000,000 in LINK, didn't sell it, and it's now worth $280,000. On that $280,000, you'll make $14,000 in a year staking.

So which would you rather have, $1,000,000 or $294,000? Some of us are here to make money, and some are here for the tech. Whatever floats your boat

[Anonymous No.56794741]

>>56794727
Youre trying to reason with a gamestop cultist

[Anonymous No.56794748]

exponential rise in anti-staking link posts beginning

[Anonymous No.56794764]

>>56794114
look into stake.link, its liquid staking like Lido

[Anonymous No.56794778]

there will be plenty of warning before the top is hit. you can unstake and sell well before the dump if you're not retarded. you're not retarded, are you? you hold chainlink, so surely not.

[Anonymous No.56794809]

>>56794741
Seems like it. Rule #2, never marry your bags

[Anonymous No.56794869]

>>56794621
>>56794268

oh you mean Linkpool, the token where the founder and CEO rugged his entire investor base the day that chainlink staking launched?

[Anonymous No.56794965]

>>56794244
I can’t tell if this is an honest post or a demoralization post but I agree with it. I am fully betting on another bullrun followed by a massive crash. Game theory, are you gonna hold while everyone else can sell and rek you? No thanks I learned my lesson last cycle.

>>56794265
I agree the gains aren’t great to justify potentially getting smoked

>>56794291
I’m extremely bullish on LINK longterm and would be looking to buy back in during a potential bear market. But I’m not losing millions in a crash. If I miss gains down the line so be it.

>>56794690
I think they’ll shill it better this cycle. And the whole market will pump anyways, I wouldn’t bet on it not doing at least 2x from its old ATH. Plus imo it really is the most important project in the space by far if you dyor, not that that meant shit last cycle but eventually you gotta think it will start to do its thing with real adoption. Sure I could be wrong but I’m betting on triple digits and definitely not selling below that even if I roundtrip. Eventually this shit will fly in earnest and I’m not getting left behind without millions in profits to justify selling low.

>>56794695
Yeah I’m going to sell and take the money this time and then rotate back in in a few years. If LINK goes to $1K in the meantime godspeed.

>>56794778
Eh, look what happened last cycle. LINK topped in May and then never went back up with the rest of the entire market in Q4, which maked zero sense and created a shitload of baggies myself included. It’s completely irrational and the paltry staking gains aren’t enough when you can lose that amount in a day of crashing much less 28 days.

[Anonymous No.56794983]

The Linkpool rug was one of the most deliciously kino moments in crypto. Seeing all the poolsclosed fags getting btfo and putting up these heartfelt posts on twitter about losing everything. God damn I relished that

[Anonymous No.56795161]

>>56794965
Now you're using that noggin

[Anonymous No.56795208]

>>56794114
congratulations, you just threw all your money away, it was much better to enter the future market of bnb or the kinetix pools

[Anonymous No.56795213]

>>56795208
Binance is going to die soon, are you an idiot or what? I doubt CZ is paying you to speak well of their platform

[Anonymous No.56795217]

>>56795208
I'd rather jump into a real pool (I can't swim) than get into a stacking again.

[Anonymous No.56795403]

>>56794869
no i mean stake.link

[Anonymous No.56795427]

>>56794114
>>56794244
>>56794291
>>56794695
>>56794965
Seems like the consensus is /nostake/. If that’s the case, what are your exit targets for this bull run? $52 $100?

[Anonymous No.56795450]

>>56795403
yes yes, the token that existing Linkpool holders were forced to migrate to while also waiving the right to pursue legal action against the Linkpool developers (for rugging them all, as previously mentioned)

[Anonymous No.56795454]

>>56794114
>However the BUILD rewards are enticing
lol never gonna happen

[Anonymous No.56795461]

>>56795427
I’m not selling under $100 minimum. If we get fucked again this cycle then we get fucked. But if I sell at $50 and it never corrects and goes to $1K I’ll rope. Eventually link will be worth hundreds of dollars per token or else the entire crypto market will fail. No other option

[Anonymous No.56795521]

I can't tell what is a troll anymore. I will say that there were some unsmart link holders that sold at 40-50 and they think they're geniuses. Of course, they didn't buy back in because they're just looking at price action and not the actual technology.

This is a really tough game. I did stake for 1 year and that shit was fucking beyond brutal. The new 30 day cool down made me want to bite more.

Link literally went sideways for over a year and ideally staking would be good if link went sideways again.

I am considering this and help me brainstorm on this. If we stake and link bounced 30-40%, you know there will be a wave of stakers unstaking within the next 30/40 days to sell.

I honestly can see many reasons to not stake unless you have a shit ton which I no longer have anymore.

[Anonymous No.56795590]

>>56794114

Ok so here’s my logic.

Staking pros:
>4% APY in link
>$1 per link per year for build rewards (more info below)

Cons:
>not being able to sell both principal and yield for 30 days if everything gigapumps and an obvious retracement is about to happen (high odds of this happening)
>possible loss of capital if contract or wallet is compromised (low odds)

You’re risking selling a 10x pump (if it goes to $150) for a measly 0.04x from the 4% APY and $15k max per year from BUILD rewards ONLY if the chainlink team decides to give them out this year, which I don’t think will happen to be honest.

For the build rewards:
>80 projects are working with chainlink
>assuming high valuation of 100 million market cap
>3% allocated per project over a period of 5 years
>rewards spread across 45 million link staked

That’s $48 million dollars per year across 45 million tokens.

That’s $1.07 dollars per year per link staked.

Assuming none of the build projects rug, and there’s a big chance of that happening. There’s a reason they joined the build project after all, if they were so good they’d have enough money to pay for oracle fees.

There’s also the concerning topic of these projects needing to release a token at all, when they’re already working just fine without one.

All in all, I don’t think staking is worth the risk, better to sell link when it pumps.

Any thoughts, anons?

[Anonymous No.56795609]

>>56795521
i have 10,000 link and i aint staking shit just cus i dont know how. i just have like 4,000 on coindbase and the rest in exodus wallets. i dont even know how to acceess said wallets anymore. i just have the seedphrase somewhere i think... my ex gf has it too, so it its not there anymore ima neck her in minecraft

[Anonymous No.56795618]

>>56795590
If we get an Amazon like multi year slow increase in price from now then staking is perfect.
Unfortunately it's impossible to predict what will happen in the future.

Without the US government manipulation the current bear market would not have happened.

[Anonymous No.56795651]

Howdy fellas, now I am NOT reading this thread but just dropping by to let y'all folks now I shall be staking my full stack indeed, and I am NOT selling

[Anonymous No.56795653]

Sell for a crumb. I want a piece. That’s what Link staking is. It’s is a piece of the pie. The whole pie. However big it is.

[Anonymous No.56795658]

The fact everyone is talking about confidently timing the top and getting out at $100-$200 makes me believe one of two things, either this cycles going to limp dick it’s way to $50 and back down to fuck everyone, or it’s going to $1500+ on the backs of all these anons ready to kiss their stacks goodbye, and no in-between. All I’m sure of is there’s no fucking way it’s going to play out the way everyone predicts, the majority will get caught with their pants down just like last cycle.

[Anonymous No.56795673]

>>56794748
How does LINK grow to trillions of dollars without a single dollar in revenue?

[Anonymous No.56795679]

>>56795590
This. Best risk/reward action is to not stake and just sell if it pumps.

I don’t see how 5% APY is good in an extremely volatile asset in already uncertain macroeconomic conditions.

[Anonymous No.56795687]

>>56795609
Dogshit bait

[popo !z5VQY4IkhY No.56795711]

>>56794965
this thread is filled with diaper poopoo tier posts

if you look at who holds link onchain, it's all whales, who never sold their link. 98% of chainlink is held by the top 3%. if you think youve learned your lesson last bull and u're gonna "learn" this time, you're playing right into those whales hands, and thats how you will end up missout out on the biggest chaqinlink price action ever. listen here you cucks, man the fuck up, you held for 6 years already, 50-100=is dogshit compared tothe real price link could reach, people who make 9 to 10 figure are people who held and never listened to idiots like this guy >>56794244, real wealth is never made in muhh obvious takes or "taking profits as soon as it pumps", its made by being more patient in the market than the rest, all what cycles do is cut out the impatient, thry will swing it, while losing part of their stacks everytime. once a bobo always a bobo, and bobos cannot reach the top, they arnt meant for it, bobos can only makes 40% gains or 80% max, the only ones who can make 100000%+ are the holders and mumus, those who arnt scared by a dumb cycle.
and if you dont believe that chainlink is a whale game, just go check the stats onchain. the whole play is to make you sell so you dont interfere with their plan.

stop caring about the price, we saw it move violently over the years without reacting, if at this point you care about price, then ure just a newfag.
the days of link swaying between 30 cents and 80 cents are over, we were there and it went from 30 cents to 50$, and today same shit is happening except link swayed between 4 and 8$
, 4-8$ is the new 30-80cents and link will go higher and higher its inevitable.

[Anonymous No.56795712]

>>56795679
This assumes you can remotely time a top. What if last cycle you sold at $3, because “hey it 3x’d the previous cycle high good time to get out”. Not only would you have never been able to buy back in at that level, decent chance you fomo back in on the way to $50 too. I’ve seen way too many anons confidently planning sells at $100-$200, there’s no way the market allows them all to win.

[Anonymous No.56795741]

>>56795618
>If we get an Amazon like multi year slow increase in price from now then staking is perfect.

What are the odds of that happening vs a pump that you can’t sell because you’re stuck for 30 days?

>Without the US government manipulation the current bear market would not have happened.

Well, don’t quote me on this because it’ll sound schizo but whatever, I think Sergey is the one suppressing the price. There’s a section on the terms of service mentioning drastic appreciation of price of the link token could break shit. He also knows a shitload of bitcoin OGs from his old days at the NXT project, Ari being in blockchain for decades, etc.

>https://chain.link/terms

>Risk of Rapid Adoption and Insufficiency of Computational Application Processing Power of the Services and the Chainlink Network: If the Services and/or the Chainlink Network are rapidly adopted, the demand for transaction processing and distributed application computations could rise dramatically and at a pace that exceeds the rate with which Chainlink services can be provided. Under such a scenario, the Services and Chainlink Network could become destabilized, due to the increased cost of running distributed applications. In turn, this could dampen interest in the Services, the Chainlink Network and Link Tokens. Insufficiency of computational resources and an associated rise in the price of Link Tokens could result in businesses being unable to acquire scarce computational resources to run their distributed applications. This could result in lost revenues and disruption or halting of business operations.

[Anonymous No.56795773]

>>56795712
It’s hard to time a top, even harder to time a top 30 days in advance. I’m keeping my options open.

>decent chance you fomo back in
Not if you already have price targets to sell.

>>56795711
Le attention whore namefag has appeared

[Anonymous No.56795782]

>I’m never selling ever but I might panic sell if the price goes up
lmao
I’m staking instantly. COPE.

[Anonymous No.56795789]

>>56794114
We are bout to drop to $11 I hate my life severely

[Anonymous No.56795812]

>>56795773
You can think you will time a top, or you can unstake when the price is within 3x of your sell target and still be earning 4% guaranteed apy the whole time until then.

And again this is assuming you’re picking a good sell target. Every fucking 2019 midwit tourist is talking about selling as soon as it hits triple digits, that’s not how markets work. Either the entire market shits the bed this cycle and none of them get to sell, or they all give their link to whales who pump the price past 4 digits.

[Anonymous No.56795822]

>>56795590
Good post. Seems like the most logical play is to hold all your stack and sell into the bullrun. Remember you can always keep some Linkies around to stake later. And you can always buy back in at a loss down the line and just have a lot less LINK. But at some point you need to protect your profits and play defense. Otherwise you risk another roundtrip and 90% loss. You’re also trusting everyone else not to dump and to hold, which of course they’ll sell.

[Anonymous No.56795831]

>>56795658
I don’t mind roundtripping again if we peak at $50. There is no way on earth I’m selling at $50, full stop. And if we explode to $1500 I will be rich even if I sell a lot earlier. I’m not dumping my entire stack. What I refuse to do is get caught offsides trying to unstake and then the market crashes and I’m fucked. The staking gains aren’t worth it

[Anonymous No.56795846]

>>56795741
>What are the odds of that happening vs a pump that you can’t sell because you’re stuck for 30 days?

The issue with this is that people always project the past onto the future because ti's in their mind.
The most probable outcome is to get something different to not make it easy to guess.
A statistical anomaly should not be considered the base case scenario.

I can imagine this happening:
A big pump trapping many into thinking the bear market is starting now, then the price continues to go up slowly without ever giving a pull back to those who sold.

>https://chain.link/terms

Would the world be a better place without lawyers?
Reminds me of state funded parasites who feel entitled to your profits through taxes despite never taking risks.

[Anonymous No.56795857]

>>56795812
>or you can unstake when the price is within 3x of your sell target and still be earning 4% guaranteed apy the whole time until then.

I don’t think I can time a top. If link hits my target I sell immediately, no need to wait 30 days a pull my hair out in uncertainty while I wait to be able to sell.

5% APY instead of being able to sell immediately once your target is hit is like picking up pennies in front of a steamroller. Massive risk for a small reward.

I can kind of understand if you had tens of millions in link and are in for a decade or two, otherwise it doesn’t make any sense.

[Anonymous No.56795860]

>>56795782
Look at this big man staking 300 stinkies, this guy has the whole favela on notice! based hodler!!

[Anonymous No.56795875]

NEVER STAKING
NEVER SELLING

It's really quite simple.

[Anonymous No.56795878]

>>56795857
>If link hits my target I sell immediately, no need to wait 30 days a pull my hair out in uncertainty while I wait to be able to sell.
Can you fucking imagine it hitting your target and then crashing 50% over the next 28 days kek. I’d fucking rope. Your entire staking reward gains can be wiped out in 24 hours in this market. It’s just not worth it. This is simple risk reward.

[Anonymous No.56795990]

You are all focusing on the price of chainlink. You should be looking at the timeline of bitcoin. It should peak around November 2025. That's when you should sell all crypto - regardless of price. Look at time not $.

[Anonymous No.56795994]

>>56795878
Maybe staking 10% of your stack would be worth it, at least to sell the build projects dust when they deposit them in a couple of years

[Anonymous No.56796044]

>>56795990
nobody cares about the boomer coin

[Anonymous No.56796112]

>>56794114
I'm still at the part of the conversation where I'm trying to understand how everyone is so casual and comfortable with this $100 assumption. It's the omnipresent sell target or price prediction. I hate to say it but the more times I fucking read that shit like it's a given, a total lock, like there isn't even the recognition or contingency that it might not actually make it there for every fucking wallet to simultaneously sell LINK ffs it makes me surer and surer that selling much earlier is far smarter. Kek, it makes me so sad what LINK's become. The bagholder deadweight feels absolutely enormous.

[Anonymous No.56796153]

>>56796112
Not gonna lie I feel bad for Dan. He was a latefag and probably bought at double digit prices. I hope he wises up and takes profits this cycle.

[Anonymous No.56796203]

>>56796153
Pretty much. Worse is he seems like a half decent guy who wears his heart on his sleeve. I just cannot wrap my head around how anyone thinks $100 is a walk. I'm guessing others have way, way more conviction than I do that in the next two years some institutional hurricane of adoption is coming from which swathes of bagholding freaks on biz will reap treasures. I hope this is bearmarket PTSD but I think I'm at the point where I can't wait to jump off the ship. It's been a long, long, almost pointless road.

[Anonymous No.56796229]

You can initiate the cooldown at any time, and if you don't withdraw after x amount of time it goes back without consequence. So if you're really scared, just be on perpetual cooldown.

[Anonymous No.56796288]

>>56796229
Yeah I also thought of that. Does cooldown cost gas? Is it free and can it be kept perpetually on like that?

[Anonymous No.56796291]

>>56796203
It hit 55 during the previous bull while sliding down to rank 25, now it's climbing back up in the top 10 and could possibly keep climbing and keep its higher rank in another bull due to the swift shit now being confirmed while l1 rotation narrative ran out of steam and bad actors like sbf and 3ac have been flushed out, ccip hasn't even hit general access yet and it's one of the few projects that kept growing and expanding during the bear. It's not hard to imagine retesting previous ath in a new bull and then 2x'ing from there. If it sounds crazy to you then you have to remember the retarded valuations for complete shitcoins at the top. How do you explain useless shit like ripple still being valued so high. All logic goes out the window in a mania market. Now what matters most is crypto total mcap and especially top blue chips vs money supply continually inflating. Link is playing the long game and will stay around and only become more relevant as a blue chip with each new cycle, no more inflation by 2030 and less circulating supply with staking, do the maths.

[Anonymous No.56796311]

You can't even withdraw tomorrow. Have to wait until priority migration ends. Sucks

[Anonymous No.56796362]

>>56796291
I think takes like this trip themselves up. You acknowledge clown market and how memes and bullshit that is easily marketed get the lion's share of the action, "all logic goes out the window", then you use fundamentals to demonstrate LINK's bull case. I don't think it matters. It did slide down to rank 25, but it did that after doing exactly what it's doing now, which is rise against in dominance. It hit rank 5 before it slid to 25. It might get ahead of the curve but I don't have any faith it will stay there because, as you say yourself, the whole idea is built on fundamentals. Fundamentals which I personally think have a long, long way to go before sufficient adoption happens.

I'll ramble now because the conversation has been pretty decent. What we got at SmartCon was it. That is what we have. I think there's this need to constantly believe that there is an undiscovered treasure chest that if you follow enough breadcrumbs will reveal itself to you because LINK's pisspoor PA runs so against the grain of everyone's ego they can't take it for what it is. I think we're all more lucid to the "behind the scenes" than many want to believe. There is a habit of envisioning a vague distant world of mass adoption as a given, imminent one. LINK exceeding its ATH would in itself be an extraordinary performance relative to all other alts except a small handful of exceptions. These threads and the tone on Twitter when it comes to LINK, that it's all just a "comfy" inevitability because you're obviously so smart and $100 is just chips anyway despite being a 20x off the lows in LINK's second cycle, just smacks of arrogant immaturity that will be punched in the mouth by life or the market. I hope to God I am wrong.

[Anonymous No.56796373]

I'm staking everything at first for a few months to earn some free Link, I doubt Link will reach my price goals during that period

[Anonymous No.56796394]

eh i'm staking all and not touching for 3 more years probably
I only have 2k link, but a paid off house and a comfy good paying job, so I don't have any reason to sell quickly. I already took profits when link hit $50, so I'm ready to let link ride til it hits something crazy

[Anonymous No.56796397]

>>56795673
Same as cardano or shiba.

Not even gonna effortpost.

[Anonymous No.56796406]

>>56796362
I’m going to be honest here because this seems like legit discussion. I think link will peak at $25 mid 2025 and then drop to $5.

It Sergey wasn’t such shit at hiring marketing people it would’ve reached $100 last run. Now with double the supply and a marketing guy (Chris) that’s about as shit as Adelyn I don’t have much hope.

Hope they’d hire a memelord to market chainlink. They’re already spending millions on irrelevant shit and they can’t pay a master memer $200k per year to create succulent memes to attract new devs and holders? At least drop a shadow advocate in here to market link and control the bullish narrative for fucks sake.

It’s like they don’t want the token to pump for some reason

[Anonymous No.56796411]

>>56796397
OG whales/VCs invested in these projects to make them pump

[Anonymous No.56796425]

>>56796411
>VCs
Citation needed niggercattle

[Anonymous No.56796427]

>>56794983
I almost forgot about that. God damn every passing day being a official Chainlink community staker has been a blessing, especially when these idiots were warned time and again.

[Anonymous No.56796441]

there is no guarantee that youre going to get in later on if you dont get in now
we are not doing this for a pittance 6fig gain
this is a generational play, newfags/brownskins wouldnt understand

[Anonymous No.56796483]

>>56796441
Meh

[Anonymous No.56796500]

>>56796406
>I think link will peak at $25 mid 2025 and then drop to $5.
why the hell are you holding link if you think $25 is the peak lmao

[Anonymous No.56796516]

>>56796500
A 2x is pretty good, I might buy a ps5 if it moons

[Anonymous No.56796527]

>>56796516
lmao alright good trolling

[Anonymous No.56796588]

>>56796229
> Staked LINK continues to accrue rewards during both the cooldown and claim window periods, up until any staked LINK is withdrawn.
Huh you are correct. It will probably cost come gas, but who cares

[Anonymous No.56796591]

>>56796441
Delusional

[Anonymous No.56796603]

>>56796229
this seems like the smart play, you are only risking LINK to moon in the next 30 days which is almost impossible

[Anonymous No.56796693]

>>56796362
GLINK was higher than old ATH a couple weeks back. That’s a sign of what a certain class of investor is willing to pay for Chainlink exposure.

[Anonymous No.56796697]

>>56796441
Yeah I’m sure I’ll get locked out forever kek. Even if that happens it would take such a high price to make you comfy from staking rewards that I’d be generationally wealthy off my stack.

[Anonymous No.56796704]

[Anonymous No.56796731]

>>56794695
That 5% APY is going to be the back bone of the new financial system. While all financial investments get flushed down the toilet.

[Anonymous No.56796737]

>>56796697
Personally I'm staking all of my link and just continuing to buy weekly/monthly. No point in stopping now so I don't see the point in not staking all of it again. I'll probably be able to buy another 3-5% towards my stack over the next 6 months if prices stay below $50 so If I really want to sell at any point cause prices go into the hundreds I'll have that to sell. However, willingly choosing to miss out on guaranteed rewards while staking doesn't have any slashing is stupid to me and I'm not willing to do that.

[Anonymous No.56796751]

The consensus is clear, my fellow Anons.
Imagine missing the top. Does that make you feel fear, uncertainty and doubt?
We're just not going to stake, okay? And you shouldn't too.

[Anonymous No.56796801]

>>56796441
the staking pool is gonna fill up instantly isnt it? i have 20k link and held them for long enough to be in early access, but moved them to a safer wallet in the middle of the eligibility period so im stuck in general

im fucked arent i?

[Anonymous No.56796808]

>>56795860
>t. nostaker
there there little man, in a couple years you will reject reality and outright deny that there were people in here with MULTIPLE 7k LINK wallets staked

you will cope with throwing away your one shot at life by writing long paragraphs with ironic snarking

at 12pm ET I will be upgrading my two staked wallets to v0.2, and will add some more LINK that I bought during this bear, at $5. How does that make you feel?

[Anonymous No.56796851]

It makes me feel like I will win. I will simply dump on your head in the bullrun toward the top, and buy even more Linkies in the bear market toward the bottom. And you’ll be totally powerless to do anything about it. You will sit there with your 4.5% rewards watching your net worth crater, potentially for the third time in a decade, wondering why in the name of god you didn’t make the obvious play, why you trusted everyone around you to hodl this extremely volatile asset like you did, when every fiber of your being told you to just take profits and be grateful and humble, when so much money was right there in front of you, when everyone here in these threads warned you, that you were betting on market cycles not applying to LINK in the next 2 years, that you were betting against human nature and history and basic game theory and psychology.

Don’t get me wrong my friend, I will certainly respect you if you come out on top! But I *feel* like I will win and you will lose. Badly.

[Anonymous No.56796858]

>>56795450
this anon knows

[Anonymous No.56796871]

>>56796808
I know there are many concern fudders in this thread. Am I gonna make it with 2500 LINK

[Anonymous No.56796883]

>>56796871
2500 LINK is future whale tier, we've told you many times already.

[Anonymous No.56796888]

Gm LPL kiddo how you doing kiddos?
Pool's closed!

[Anonymous No.56796900]

>>56796871
>Am I gonna make it with 2500 LINK
my dude there is a reward floor of 4.32% which equals to 108 linkies per year, at the very minimum (the rewards are adjusted as people come and go from the pool)

That is mininum 108k per year for doing fuck all. Not even factoring in BUILD rewards.

[Anonymous No.56796925]

I never buy power all tickets but I did today to try and get away from this place quicker. First thing I saw one one of the lines was a 12… which was the powerball. Then I saw 61 which was 1 of the numbers. Then the rest I didn’t get. I was 5 numbers away from never having to come back to this shithole ever when.

[Anonymous No.56796957]

>>56794690
Overpriced, overpumped, overbought. At the peak of the bullmarket, it won't touch 50$.
Linkies should be slurping other solid Oracle based tokens with way lower market cap. Rather than a 5% shitty return on staking.

[Anonymous No.56796979]

>>56796603
I'll help you remove 'almost'.
>>56795990
No one cares about Bitcoin, no use case beyond store of value.
You should sell, buy LINK, PYTH, or SUPRA. Make over 100x then you can buy btc for keeps. That's the stuff of gigabrain chads

[Anonymous No.56796988]

>>56796406
why bother holding for a mid 2025 peak of $25? especially if you envision a drop back down to $5 when it's currently around 3 times that?

We say chainlink is shit at marketing and although I agree, they do have 1 million followers on twitter. Obviously not all of them are real and of those who are real not all are holding link, but it still indicates that there are a lot of link holders. The marketing ain't good but word has still got around.
On the flip side, i'm almost always one of the first 500 viewers of a new Sergey chainlink video and those videos don't get big numbers.

That they are after some evangelists is disconcerting. They had the ears and eyes of thousands of banks at Sibos and what has happened since has been underwhelming. Getting the stage at Sibos has been a huge achievement in itself and i appreciate that the regulatory clarity isn't here so it isn't simple at all, but such things like regulations can lag behind a long time and in that time other avenues appear. The hubris of the holders who envision victory with such certainty is something to behold. I do think it will happen. I'm not selling. I'm one of those posters who gets his pasta copied. I am not selling. All that being said, however, doesn't mean i'm right and what we think will happen will actually happen. And everyday that we think we are closer because we have inched closer to that reality is also a day where an opportunity to close the deal is missed. From this vantage point, with an 'inflection point approaching' , every major financial player will onboard. But many things appear certain until they aren't and all grand projects eventually fall by the wayside.

Are we to forget we were, to some degree, anticipating partnership announcements at the two conferences in October and November? We've got something in Hong Kong and talk of 'discussions about production, not poc, not sandboxing, actual production.''
Well, after opening Sibos, you'd hope so.

[Anonymous No.56797017]

>>56796988
ignore him bro he's an unwashed no pooler. theyre basically cattle. pools closed based chuddie kiddos

GM based chuddie doing now kiddo? based!?

pools closed.

few.

[Anonymous No.56797087]

>>56796988
Didn't read all this garbage, but I could feel the sadness in the tone of the text, coming from a frustrated LINK holder.
Feel free to sell if your paperhand is itching desu, other oracle based projects are gaining traction. Don't be a normie

[Anonymous No.56797273]

staking very bad sirs pls do not stake me good faith anon saying staking = scam do not steak!!1

[Anonymous No.56797315]

>>56795711
go away narcissist

[Anonymous No.56797334]

>>56794114
LINK IS PUMPING. POOR LINK FUDDIES LOL

GET ON YOUR FAWKIN HANDS AND KNEES LOSERS!!! LOL

[Anonymous No.56797415]

>>56794244
Hello Rat Pads

[Anonymous No.56797423]

>>56795711
>98% is held by the heckin 3%
None of us care because the vast majority of us are within the top 3% of wallets. Those arent "Whales", they're autists just like us.

[Anonymous No.56797449]

>good faith
>dude just time the top and sell instead of staking
Lol

[Anonymous No.56797453]

>>56794114
have you heard of stake.link its the Lido of Chainlink(liquid staking)

[Anonymous No.56797473]

>>56796988
>why bother holding for a mid 2025 peak of $25?
Sold most of my link position months ago during the great crabbing. Now I’m only holding because there’s a possibility of Sergey having something under his sleeve. That said, with each passing day I have less and less hope of that being the case.


>extremely bad marketing hires
>build projects being basically dust
>build project tokens not being deposited
>build projects not really needing a token
>passive attitude regarding legislation from Sergey (no lobbying to push for legal clarity). “Every year is the year for me. I don’t know why it takes so long! We need to wait for a disaster for Chainlink to be adopted”
>millions of tokens dumped for fiat without providing a reason why
>lack of updates on revenue
>no support from VCs to pump the price and Sergey actively discouraging price action discussion
>Price probably being kept from appreciating too fast by Sergey himself or parties close to him (chart being painted is close to being statistically impossible organically)

I’ll hold just in case Schmidt’s connections can somehow make the price gigapump, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. He probably doesn’t have a lot of power any longer/just wants to have sex with his gf, it’s extremely surprising to see how fast power is lost once someone has left an important position. It’s like those disclosures from ex high ranking three letter agencies directors that disclose ufos and stuff like that. No one gives a shit once they’re not in their former powerful position. See https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1250333

>But many things appear certain until they aren't and all grand projects eventually fall by the wayside

I’m surprised by the certainty linkmarines have on their investment. Assblaster certainly did a great job at creating a bullish narrative for link, some people are truly like cult members blindly optimistic about the projects future without understanding how it really works.

[Anonymous No.56797522]

>28 days unlock

lmfao

[Anonymous No.56797617]

>>56795679
>Best risk/reward action is to not stake and just sell if it pumps

You’re not taking into account the potential gains that you’d be missing out on by selling. Sure, selling after a pump will guarantee that you don’t lose money. But it introduces the risk of missing out on truly big gains. Only a maniac would still hold after an asset has already linked 10x right? We’ll guess what, it just decided to 10x again and you already sold

IMO it would hurt more to sell early than to hold past the top

[Anonymous No.56797628]

>>56797423
What % of wallets does 1K LINK make you

[Anonymous No.56797678]

>>56795590
>possible loss of capital if contract or wallet is compromised (low odds)
how new are you? every single staking platforms been "hacked"

[Anonymous No.56797689]

[Anonymous No.56797690]

https://youtu.be/VZP5lIzGNT8

In your fear and uncertainty it will be tempting to put your trust in some person or group who emerges and claims to have a "way out", which will involve sacrificing some of your liberty. You must resist this urge. These self‑proclaimed saviors may appear in many forms, under any number of banners: "intellectuals", "influential people", "progressive thinkers", "billionaires", "the UN", "the EU", "self‑selected multinational coalition", "global leaders", "world governments", "radicals", "revolutionaries" or some combination of these. They may appear charismatic. They may appear to have your best interests at heart. They may stand united, arm‑in‑arm, proclaiming "We know the way forward", advancing some form of "people's revolution" or "Global Reset" where "you will be in charge", hawking various "‑isms" and promises of a better tomorrow. These people are not your friends. They are not to be trusted. They are the same global banking elites using the same fear tactics, shilling the same magic potions and snake oils as always. They want only one thing: power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cieu5nDDssc

[Anonymous No.56797705]

>>56795658
i would like to think that chainlink needs to prove its worth staking for them at a mere 4%, so maybe thats why they will go hard with making the token price go up? idk, they have limp dicked the lasg two bullruns and i feel like its bitinf them in the ass now, altho the pools close so quick...idk what to think

[Anonymous No.56797735]

>>56796731
they lowered it to 4% retard

[Anonymous No.56797780]

>>56796808
I was under the impression that you will not be able to add to your wallet until the priority period ends

[Anonymous No.56798137]

>>56796362
>>56796406
See guys? This is how you write decent FUD.

[Anonymous No.56798192]

the desperate fud is palpable itt

[Anonymous No.56798200]

>>56796808
based

[Anonymous No.56798218]

>>56796851
>Using "feelings" for making money
Yikes ngmi

[Anonymous No.56798305]

>>56795450
this
fuck linkpool stake.link scammers

[Anonymous No.56798373]

I missed the top last time but I'm still staking
All of you who are afraid are just cowards who will not be rewarded. The last cycle happpened for a reason, they dump BTC every time LINK pumps because the institutions don't want you staking. Then V.3 rolls around and guess who doesn't have priority staking anymore? You losers. LINK is actually being used now. Last time the pump was speculatory, this time it's not coming down.
sneed

[Anonymous No.56798395]

>>56794244
>Lets be real staking completely incentivizes missing the top.
this is the key point here. They are dangling build rewards to keep you on the rollercoaster. Exactly like they did with ccip and staking in 22

[Anonymous No.56798425]

>>56798395
>missing the top
if you truly understand the value of what is happening, by all means "sell the top", which could mean anything. 20, 30, 50. this is your once in a life time opportunity to be set and you people here are concerned with couch change. apy on an appreciating asset with a near unlimited ceiling for value.

[Anonymous No.56798428]

>>56794114
>BUILD rewards
it's impressive. these are essentially rebranded scratch off tickets,tge marketing team at chainlink deserve their christmas bonus this year

[Anonymous No.56798461]

>>56798428
They're just the new run of shite looking for a free ad. For years we had "cumlordinu integrates chainlink price feeds!" and it was just pajeet scams using the free chainlink twitter advert. Now they're doing the same as BUILD projects.

I guarantee the vast majority of the listed projects never exist to be distributed. It's also pretty scummy how none were given during v0.1 despite the promise. Now people have to chase over to v0.2 with the carrot still dangling.

[Anonymous No.56798568]

>>56798425
>if you truly understand the value of what is happening, by all means "sell the top",
listen faggot, ive been bagholding since 2017, this stupid play doesnt work on me anymore. the only thing sergey and the team have been consistent about is changing on what they are supposed to deliver on a project from 2017. For example the white paper 2.0 bullshit. That being said after reading this thread the general sentiment is that anons want out. so i might just stake half my stack incase the fat ass delivers but it a regular thing with him to kick the can down the road and dangle a new incentive to keep us bagholding just for him to throw rooftop parties with bankers

[Anonymous No.56798638]

>>56798568
yet you still bag hold. you held at 50, and you continue so at 15 even when it's thousands of percentage of roi. you understand the opportunity here and it might be impossible for retail to stake in the future.

[Anonymous No.56798658]

>>56798638
what even is this response? Anon what do you do when you invest in somthing, do you wait for a 2% gain , do you sell at the least profitable time, or do you sell at the most profitable time, or do you continue to bag holding to fund a fat fucks fantasy of being a tech startup ceo?

[Anonymous No.56798707]

>>56798658
it's relative to the investment. buying a call is different than investing in an etf, dividend stock or your 401k, right? this would be a retirement investment. revolutionary financial technology that hasn't yet taken flight and is the first of its kind with its dividend distribution. it's buying oil fields before cars are invented.

[Anonymous No.56798741]

>>56796397
So it's just a pump and dump Ponzi?

Cool business model, I'm sure Wallstreet, banks and pension funds are lining up to buy your Stinkcel bags.

Lyl
Lemao even

[Anonymous No.56798742]

>>56794114
You really need a containment thread. Jannies please do the needful

[Anonymous No.56798770]

>>56798707
anon way to have a discussion with out actually having a discussion

[Anonymous No.56798853]

>>56798770
i don't know what more you want. sell whatever you need to but don't miss out on this chance that you may never have again to stake an asset that yields apy in that asset. i would hate for anons to harm themselves down the road due to squandering a chance, ie, selling eth at 14, the top, to buy back at 12 that never came.

[Anonymous No.56798895]

>>56798853
you dont get the space you're in even though its being discussed thouroughly right now in this thread. i will caps lock it for you

NO ON WANTS TO BAG HOLD THIS SHITCOIN ANOTHER CYCLE JUST FOR SERGEY TO DELIVER BULLSHIT MONTH PRODUCT UPDATES. NO ONE WANTS TO HAVE THEIR LIQUIDTY TIED UP INCASE THEY WANT TO TAKE PROFITS DURING THE BULL RUN.

even with the fundamentals of the project being perfect it still does not mean fuck all when markets turn risk off, because everything(even irl assets) take a shit you absolute retard

[Anonymous No.56798946]

>>56798741
Thats right anon its a scam. By all means you should avoid it and buy better projects like idk what but im sure your fellow brownoids will be willing to clue you in.

As I said, dont buy link its a scam

[Anonymous No.56798951]

>>56798895
so i say again, "sell what you need to survive", ie, liquidity if you are an active short to mid term trader. it's why i distinguished the differences in products such as a derivative vs a dividend yielding security. this is clearly a longer term investment and selling a "top" might crush you if it's a short term, local one. you endure more psychological damage in missed opportunities than actually losing money.

[Anonymous No.56798987]

>>56798951
reading ivestopedia wont make you money

[Anonymous No.56798990]

>>56798987
i work in finance, anon.

[Anonymous No.56799040]

>>56798990
thats not something to be proud of mate, but gj on you having a career

[Anonymous No.56799060]

>>56798990
it's not fulfilling and i never said otherwise. but good luck on your managing of this investment.

[Anonymous No.56799061]

>>56794114
If you plan to sell then don't steak. It's a midwit trap for the coolaid drinkers to remain ensared in the ponzi. All crypto is a ponzi and your flavor is chainlink. If you wish to exit the ponzi at your own volition then do not stake. If you want to hodl forever then stake and stare at the carrot until the ponzi collapses.

[Anonymous No.56799105]

>>56798895
>NO ON WANTS TO BAG HOLD THIS SHITCOIN ANOTHER CYCLE JUST FOR SERGEY TO DELIVER BULLSHIT MONTH PRODUCT UPDATES. NO ONE WANTS TO HAVE THEIR LIQUIDTY TIED UP INCASE THEY WANT TO TAKE PROFITS DURING THE BULL RUN.


Anon, you have an opportunity that comes once every several generations and you're crying about not being able to cash out and "making it".

This short sighted attitude will cause you to end up like pic related. Even if you somehow manage to have diamond hands to sell at $300.

To other anons, listen to >>56798707. This staking opportunity is Chainlink Labs' way of rewarding you for your loyalty. Yes, there's the 4.32% APY but you're getting an airdrop from all the startup companies who make it to launch with the BUILD program. There are some 70+ companies and this will continue to expand since Web3 companies need an oracle provider if they want to be worth a damn.

Just accept Chainlink's generosity. Take profits from the staking rewards and you'll be set for life and your grand children will be set for life as well.

[Anonymous No.56799133]

>>56794727
Stop he’s already dead!!!

[Anonymous No.56799143]

>>56794114
Staking is a bet on the future. You're betting that by holding an early position you'll get first access to future massive gains. Not staking is a bet that you can make more money by selling the tops and rebuying the bottom (or just spending the money if that's what you want). Either way you're gambling. One is a long term bet. One is a short term bet. The idiots who keep posting "pools closed" about LPL are really poking fun at those who think they can just stake whenever they want in the future. You may not get a chance to get in the pool. You may only be allowed a small amount. You might get a lesser interest rate than those who have been in all along. This entire market is gambling. Pick your poison.

[Anonymous No.56799170]

>>56798946
>Thats right anon its a scam. By all means you should avoid it and buy better projects like idk

I'm here to protect newfags and their money, not convince some 6-year+ mentally broken bagholder.
I will ensure not a dollar flows into your Ponzi to pump your bags.

FYI, I held LINK from early 2017-2021, the difference between a successful shitcoin flipper and a bagholder like you is we NEVER, EVER get married to your shitcoin bags.

Is the speculation potential gone? Already pumped and dumped? SOLD. You never hold a shitcoin past its expiry date. LINK is most definitely expired, it's a 2017-tier ICO shitcoin like REQ and FUN, only kept alive because Sergey mastered the VeChain "ENTERPRISE ADOPTION SOON" grift.

Thousands of bagcels already arriving at this realization. Newfags not touching this garbage.

[Anonymous No.56799195]

>>56799105
Literal cult mentality, there's no saving you baggies
Daddy ser gay isn't going to save you

[Anonymous No.56799216]

>>56799170
Im not reading your incel manifesto you drooling mongoloid kek

[Anonymous No.56799250]

>>56799216
t. jeet

[Anonymous No.56799270]

>>56799105
>Anon, you have an opportunity that comes once every several generations and you're crying about not being able to cash out and "making it".
yah how did that work out in the bear market?

[Anonymous No.56799302]

>>56795711
>chaqinlink
>thry
>arnt
>ure
stop sniffing glue

[Anonymous No.56799537]

>>56795450
>>56795450
>>56796858
>>56798305
I'm still pissed about this. I'm staking part of my (real) chainlink stack, hodling the rest. Fuck LPL, fuck fuddies,

[Anonymous No.56799908]

>>56796311
That is untrue

[Anonymous No.56799921]

>>56796311
you can withdraw all of it right now if you wish.

[Anonymous No.56800387]

>>56797449
>good faith
>dude just lose 90% of your profits roundtripping again
>dude just baghold crypto for a literal decade of your life

[Anonymous No.56800546]

>>56800387
>dude just invest for 10 years and make a million dollars
how horrible, truly horrible. a fate i would wish on no one, especially myself

[Anonymous No.56800646]

>>56798425
See this is exactly why I’m torn and considering staking half my stack and forgetting about it. Longterm the hodlers always win. Everyone told me to sell at $1 in 2019. Staking LINK now is likely guaranteeing that you will be financially secure in the future.

[Anonymous No.56800886]

>>56796988
>>56797473

Holy shit. What a faggot you are. I would donate 300 link to Israel just to see a picture of you and what you look like.

[Anonymous No.56801067]

>>56796112
good post. Remember this place is an echo chamber. Only in a delusional cult member's head is a 7x return a guaranteed formality

>>56796362
>Fundamentals
most people here don't understand that term. As it currently stands, Link has zero fundamentals. It starts with revenue, of which they do ~$500 per day.

Basically everyone here is counting on a miracle pump based purely off speculation. There is no "adoption" coming anytime soon, if ever.

>>56796406
My prediction is in the same ballpark. I think it maybe gets up to like $35. Should be a similar result as IOTA's chart in the '21 bullrun compared to '17/early 18.

[Anonymous No.56801157]

>>56796988
>partnership announcements
It's not 2017 anymore. Completely meaningless

>>56798373
>>56798425
these Gamestop esque posts don't hit like they used to eh

[Anonymous No.56801235]

>>56801157
>le Gamestop
go back

[Anonymous No.56801265]

>>56798658
>making profit is bad unless you made the maximum possible profit and made every single decision 100% perfectly at the exact right time.
Dude you must be a billionaire if you can time things so perfectlyz

[Anonymous No.56801682]

chainlink is a ponzi with a strong narrative(unlike lets say shiba which is a ponzi with a weak narrative)

most linkies will baghold through another parabolic pump and dump because they genuinely don't realize there's no revenue and its all a speculative ponzi.

[Anonymous No.56803555]

>>56801682
anon's post is a huge cope with a strong narrative (the stuff he's made up)

most anons will cope with just a word or two, but anon will cope with a lot of words because he can't handle reality

[Anonymous No.56804053]

>>56801265
at one point did i ever say anything about timing the market you twat

[Anonymous No.56804202]

>>56795712
>>56795812
If you can't time the top then it's because you're being insanely greedy. BTC and ETH were hovering around their tops for 6 months to a year last cycle. Really, you should be aiming for a range, 2-3 months before the next ATH and 2-3months after the ATH.

Link had a peak run last cycle from Feb 2021 to Jun 2021. If you bought anytime before Jan of 2021 you would've turned profits. Even more profits the closer to the ICO day you were.

Point is, assuming this cycle mimics last cycle you're going to to have a 4 to 6 month window to take your profits, a life raft, and get the hell off of the ship. You don't have to time the top perfectly. Just be within that 4 to 6 month window. Don't be the idiot that goes down with the ship for holding out for a 50x when he could have just taken a 40x. Pick a sell target and stick to it.

[Anonymous No.56804268]

>>56796112
Correct. We will top at about 45 and then fall back to 5 in the bear. I will be taking advantage of that.

[Anonymous No.56804300]

>>56804202
>the top
Once Link gets going there isn't going to be a top. It's just going to keep growing. These fudding arsecunts know this and that's why they keep telling us about timing some cycle-based 'top'.
Ignore them. Hold as long as you can and sell as little as you must.

[Anonymous No.56804313]

So I got 1000 link at only a few dollars, will I be pretty rich in the coming years?

[Anonymous No.56804475]

>>56804300
>Once Link gets going
Two more weeks marines

[Anonymous No.56804493]

>>56796406
If it peaked at 25 it would drop a lot lower than 5 in the bear. Drawdown from 50 to 5 was le maymay 90% drop. 25 top would put as at about 2.50 in bear bottom (lel gay). Possibly lower from the utter despair and chart ugliness.

[Anonymous No.56804788]

The link dickriding is astronomical

[Anonymous No.56805765]

Oldfag here. I once held 290k LINK. I was a top 100 LINK wallet throughout 2018-2021.
I got lucky to sell 75% of my stinkies above $40. I set a goal and stuck to it. I still can’t believe it actually fucking worked. If I held and watched the entire bag lose 95% of its gains I think I’d of necked.
I have enough to max out 5 wallets but I won’t. I migrated my stake and plan to max out 1 account, roughly 7600 more when allowed.
I’ll have 60k link to swing on the ride up. I’m already financially secure because Im a workaholic that lives a modest life. If the staking thing pans out …great. If not, no big deal because I’d be selling along the way regardless.

[Anonymous No.56806027]

>>56805765
>i was already rich and i would of necked myself cause i was already rich so now im still rich and going to be more rich

[Anonymous No.56806354]

I migrated for only 22 dollars. All you had to do was wait.

[Anonymous No.56806361]

Need some help.
My staked linkies are in a ledger and connected it by metamask on a firefox.
Tried to migrate but it says something about missing u2f extension, and even with that turned to true it still doesnt work. Ledgers website says that it no more supports newer firefox versions. It suggests using chrome instead. Im little nervous about importing metamask to a new browser. Are there things that i should be especially cautious about?
Did anyone else have similiar problems?

[Anonymous No.56806457]

>>56806361
Use brave instead

[Anonymous No.56807121]

For newfags ITT
Everyone here is staking Link, yes even the fuddies

[Anonymous No.56807174]

>>56804475
You really think fud works at this point? You're just full of spite because your life is crap. Sad af.

[Anonymous No.56807197]

>>56799270
ETH has provided NOTHING of value that other chains cannot do and that's why everyone is gunning to become an ETH killer.

nobody thought BTC and ETH would even go past 100 dollars per token. This stuff has actual use cases currently.

[sage No.56807637]

>>56794114
>90 percent of this thread is just the same small group of broke fudcucks samefagging without even bothering to change up their writing styles in a sick, desperate attempt to convince people not to stake

lol this definition really does fit i guess:
fudcuck
noun
fud-cuck
plural fudcucks, kekfuddies

1: a misguided, unpaid, and disgruntled personal assistant to link holders and stakers
"I just woke up! I could clean up the smegma scented basement I live in, but today I need to spend 8 hours angrily keeping biz up to date on my latest headcanon!" - your average fudcuck
2: an angry retard who lives on biz and is bitter about selling at a loss / gambling it all away on a lending platform: person affected with extreme intellectual disability or emotional instability
3: a mindbroken, low testosterone ESL "male" - usually from a third-world country, who found biz after 2021 and is obsessed with the investments of other men and feels a need to always post about it

The terms fudcuck, kekfuddie, and their derivatives are currently used as technical descriptors in medical, educational, and regulatory contexts. These uses are broadly rejected by fudcucks, mostly because they find them incredibly offensive and upsetting

[Anonymous No.56807923]

>>56794114
put a chick in it and make her gay

[Anonymous No.56808017]

>>56794244
holy shit its like an AA/NA meeting. i love the intimacy and tales of woe.

[Anonymous No.56808037]

>>56795213
wasnt THORCHAIN a binance launchpad project?

[Anonymous No.56808349]

>>56798853
>selling eth at 14, the top, to buy back at 12
the days of eth gains are over, eth going up so much in so little time was only due to crypto being still in early stages in 2016/17, people always compare link to the eth chart but it's not gonna happen, eth mooned so hard purely based on hype because even today in 2023 no real world companies are using ethereum or any other blockchains for anything
I'm with the non staking chads, I'm dumping half of my stack in the $60-$100 range while stake cucks ride it all the way back down to $8 wasting another 5 years of their lives in a bear market waiting for the next bullrun that may never ever come, selling half in this bullrun is a financial suicide prevention and if it keeps going up? well we still have another half of the stack but if it dumps we enjoy and progress in life, buying houses and shit while staking cultist cucks go through another 15 years of a bear market waiting for the dangling carrot to finally fall down

[Anonymous No.56808395]

>>56799143
if you can't stake in the future the the tokens won't go up and if it's won't go up it's worthless and if it's worthless every early stakers shit also becomes worthless

[Anonymous No.56808412]

>>56795711
>98% of chainlink is held by the top 3%.
it's called exchange wallets

[Anonymous No.56808505]

>>56807197
anon it doesnt matter in a risk off scenario. you could be trading jesus chirsts blood and the price would still shit the bed

[Anonymous No.56808552]

holy fuck this thread is cringe
staking two wallets with maximum allotment and I will sell maybe a thousand or two LINK incrementally when we near the top

[Anonymous No.56808569]

>>56808349
it's not the chart, it's the progression of technology. it's the very clear next step to all of this. bitcoin(blockchain) > ethereum(smartcontracts) > chainlink(oracle network)

[Anonymous No.56808592]

>>56795711
Let the fucking rats run off with their little cheese.

[Anonymous No.56808602]

>>56806354
You also missed out on an extra couple LINK while you waited due to the reward rate being so high to begin with

[Anonymous No.56809491]

>>56796737
This brings up a question for me that nobody has been able to answer thus far.
If community staking doesn’t ever get subjected to slashing, how is it securing the network?
If community staking does get subjected to slashing, how the fuck is that supposed to work? You arent the one reporting prices, the nodes are. So at that point you are just handing over 15k link in the hopes that you will get paid 4% instead of losing it all through no fault of your own, with no way to control those odds? I dont get it.

[Anonymous No.56809532]

>>56809491
>The future of finance

quick advocates, you better hit him with a copy/paste le fudder rib to shut him down

[Anonymous No.56809577]

>>56809532
I hold a large stack and i am never selling. I just dont get how community staking and slashing are supposed to work.

[Anonymous No.56809600]

>>56809491
slashing is planned though, rewards are just currently subsidized by chainlink until it's live. that means in the event of faulty data, cll is taking on the risk. when it is live, it's not 1:1 in terms of slashing the value equivalent of the transfer(ie, transaction worth 1 million usd is reported incorrectly by a node, slash 1 million worth of link collateral), it's done at a much smaller scale. the obvious idea is that it's much more worthwhile to report good data, maintain security and collect fees vs possible collusion to scam a transaction. the latter seems like it will be impossible to even pull off from what i've read from ari juels' work.

[Anonymous No.56809696]

>>56809600
I understand how slashing is supposed to work. The thing i dont get is how community staking pools get slashed. As a community staker, you are not reporting any prices, at all. So how are you supposed to get slashed? If someone else fucks up? If the answer is “you arent” then you arent really securing the network, are you?

[Anonymous No.56809785]

>>56809696
well community staking pools aren't getting slashed at the moment; currently it is just node operator stakers. but in the future, after reputation has been established among nodes, you will likely have the option where to stake, or perhaps the delegation tool will still exist to distribute amongst the top ones. and yea, that is the idea. if your link is with a node that fucks up, you will likely pay a small penalty in your stake for it. i think currently it's 700 link from the node's pool.

[Anonymous No.56809826]

>>56809491
>If community staking doesn’t ever get subjected to slashing, how is it securing the network?

As it stands right now, I see the community staking pool purely as Chainlink Labs being very generous to their hardcore investors. It's basically a charity work from them to us.

[Anonymous No.56809963]

>>56809785
This makes a little more sense. Time will tell i guess. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.56809982]

https://vocaroo.com/1mYSOJDNmrG9

[Verse]
Sittin' by the river, watchin' the sunset glow (oh-yeah)
Stackin' up my tokens, ready to make 'em grow (ooh-ooh)
With every little stake, I'm earnin' that yield (that yield)
Passive income flowin', feelin' so thrilled (so thrilled)
Livin' life easy, no need to run or hide (no need to hide)

[Chorus]
Stake it up, watch it rise (watch it rise)
Eatin' steaks, feelin' so wise (yeah-yeah)
Earnin' yield, livin' the dream (livin' the dream)
Pool's closed, it's just you and me (only you and me)
Stake it up, we're takin' control (takin' control)
Buildin' wealth, watch it unfold (watch it unfold)
Pop folk vibes, feelin' so fine (oh-yeah)
Stake it up, it's our time to shine (our time to shine)

[Anonymous No.56811300]

>>56808552
yeah enjoy making no fucking money. smug retard

[Anonymous No.56811321]

>>56807174
You’re delusional and you will be proven wrong yet again. Wise up

[Anonymous No.56811339]

>>56808569
Sergey himself said they are waiting for regulation which will take another 2-3 years.

[Anonymous No.56811751]

>>56811300
>>56811321
>>56811339
>triple posts
Kek you seem upset

[Anonymous No.56811918]

>>56809826
pretty much
on the other hand though, all the crypto twitter faggots like use the old "if it's 4% on just the eth feed, imagine what the rate for everything else is going to be."
Of course it's not going to be 4% of every feed or data point.
The big picture is that Chainlink is going to use their runway and token reserves until the network is generating enough fees to make a profit and keep everything secure.

[Anonymous No.56812553]

>>56807197
>MY special altcoin is the next BTC/ETH because it's MINE

It's the next Amazon right?

[Anonymous No.56812954]

>>56809491
>>56809696
It'll evolve into a subsidy emergency insurance fund for NEET nodes to get off the ground.
Then all the risk averse people will pull out and it'll finally get reward rates higher than banks can give.

[Anonymous No.56813559]

>>56806361
Yeah, can try switching advanced setting from u2f to WebHID. If that fails use wallet connect with ledger live.

[Anonymous No.56814061]

>>56809826
>As it stands right now, I see the community staking pool purely as Chainlink Labs being very generous to their hardcore investors. It's basically a charity work from them to us.
no. They are using your tokens to figure out how everything is going to work.

[Anonymous No.56814499]

>>56806361
I had this problem and I tried going to Vivaldi. It failed me. Then I went to Chrome and got the issue solved.

Also found out I had another wallet with Link in there. I keep finding all these hidden wallets with Link, but not goddamned ETH.

[Anonymous No.56815223]

>>56794114
look into stake.link, its the LIDO of the Chainlink network

[Anonymous No.56815851]

>>56811751
Thanks for bumping my thread. Here’s another.