[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 3 KB, 250x238, 1615000063795s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56514175 No.56514175 [Reply] [Original]

I'm starting to think $100 LINK is a long shot.

>> No.56514177

>>56514175
Always was

>> No.56514184
File: 102 KB, 353x299, 1662484543511220.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56514184

>>56514175
look at the day chart. over sold. you're right

>> No.56514380

>>56514175
It hit $52 so it's bot out of the question. Absolute max it might hit around $250, of everything goes right. Zero chance it hits $1k.

>> No.56514403

based lpl chuds how you doing kiddo?

>> No.56514560

>>56514175
During the next bull run $100 is doable

>> No.56514570

retards

>> No.56514850

Honestly the idea of link ever even touching eth's mcap seems completely absurd even though project wise there's no reason it shouldn't easily surpass eth. That would put it close to $400

>> No.56514891

kek swingies

>> No.56514970

>>56514175
it's not, fren
$100 next year is a virtual certainty

>> No.56515936

>>56514970
>>56514560
Just saying, people felt the same last time. Alts rarely ever make a new ATH in their second cycle. Those are just hard facts. You can argue fundamentals for sure but so many people got rekt last cycle by clinging to LINK in incredulity. This market is highly retarded.

>> No.56515966

>>56515936
>It happened before so it will happen again
>muh market cycles
>muh speculation
you have no idea what you're invested in

>> No.56515974

>>56515966
>triggered by literal facts
Okay snowflake, let me know when you're ready to live in reality again

>> No.56515975

>>56515966
>>56515936
>>56514970
>>56514891
>>56514850
>>56514570
>>56514560
>>56514403
>>56514184
>>56514177
>>56514175
If Bitcoin hits 180,000 this upcoming bull, that means a mcap of roughly 3.3 trillion. With 2% chainlink dominance of that market Link would be worth exactly 66,000,000,000. As in a 10x from now, which places at right around low 3 figures. Stop blackpilling because of a mild pushback from 11.90 to 11.72. We are higher than we have been in over a year.

>> No.56515981

>>56515974
>>56515936
>triggered
>snowflake
YWNBA woman btw feller

>> No.56516001

>>56515981
>mad
It was actually a totally reasonable post. Perhaps you're simply deranged?

>> No.56516073

>>56515936
Talking about "alts" in 2023. You should update your thinking bro

>> No.56516204

>>56515974
>snowflake
lol go back to tiktok or whatever the fuck

>> No.56516220

>>56514175
Well I think you're an idiot and it's inevitable.

>> No.56516225

>>56514175
It actually is a longshot and will require a lot of patience. this is one reason I diversified into FLUX, GLMR, NXRA, and FTM.

>> No.56516227

>>56514175
It is not fren

>> No.56516229
File: 2.96 MB, 398x718, 1661507066563221.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56516229

>>56514175
dont underestimate the power of positive thinking

>> No.56516254

>>56515936
ETH made a new ATH in its second cycle.
>inb4 ETH is special
So is LINK
DOGE made a new ATH in its second cycle.
XMR made a marginal new ATH in its second cycle. And last but not least........LINK made a new ATH in its second cycle.

Even if none of those coins had made a new ATH in their second cylce and we were proposing LINK would be the first altcoin to ever do it, there's no law preventing it from happening. There is no crypto rulebook that markets have to follow. If the demand for LINK tokens exceeds the supply, the price will go up. If the demand is high enough, the previous ATH will be broken again. Simple as.

>> No.56516265
File: 55 KB, 924x558, photo_2023-09-17_16-32-54.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56516265

I think if you are still talking about Link you should KYS. Sound like fucking moonbois. R&R better on something like Spurdo or Smurfcat. Shit even Pepe even though its at 500m.

Linkies is dead. Just face it already

>> No.56516271

>>56515975
If btc is at 3.3 tril mc that means total crypto mc will be 10-12 tril mc
So link at 2% dominance is 200-240 bil mc
Which is 300ish per link token depending on exact dumps

>> No.56516299

>>56516265
Fuck off, nobody cares about your vaporware meme do-nothing garbage shitcoins.
Filtered this ID, don't bother responding pajeet discord collaborator. Talk about lowest of the low shitcons, shilling your garbage should be bannable.

>> No.56516339

>>56516271
Maybe in 2030

>> No.56516426
File: 392 KB, 1080x580, 1665597523950093.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56516426

>>56516204
Thanks for the pop culture update, zoomie, last I knew snowflake described the kind of person who'd use TikTok actually but I clearly don't have my finger on the pulse of such critically important distinctions like you do.

>>56516254
I rate LINK's fundamentals higher than anything. My original point was in response to the suggestion $100 is a "virtual certainty". It is very interesting as triple figs was considered a lock in 2020 after the August run too. That was 3 years ago. I pointed out that actually it would constitute, as you put it yourself, "something special". You can point to ETH per usual as the blue sky benchmark, but the point is you're pointing to exceptions to describe something you all speak about in certainty. The implication of that is interesting as it really implies this a critical time for LINK and even in the ranks of the faithful this cycle is all or nothing, whether you meant to admit it or not. You're saying it is going to perform exceptionally because it is exceptional. If it doesn't, that means it isn't exceptional, but I doubt any of you would have the ability to admit that if it happened. You run out of comparisons after ETH. You're on your last one. I think that's worth pointing out in these echo chamber threads, yes.

And while there might not be any unbreakable laws of physics here, discounting all history and data because of that is a just a dumb move if you're someone building an actual strategy for a cycle. Expectations should be relative as that's the entire game of trading and investment. As I said, if LINK doesn't pull it off, you begin to run out of excuses to keep saying it's exceptional. If it does, LINK's untouchable. If LINK hits $100 it should be blasted across the whole fucking industry. I wouldn't play it off as a certainty. But as I said, the market is retarded.

>> No.56516808

>>56516426
i can smell your breath from just reading this

>> No.56516905

Kek token not needed.
Nobody cares about link outside of biz.

>> No.56516935
File: 108 KB, 631x480, 7C15B5A4-C186-4D97-B551-6C5FEB985C83.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56516935

>>56514184
>over sold
You played yourself bobo

>> No.56517402

>>56514560
Link doesnt moon in bull runs. Its the bear market coin, meaning its always in a bear market

>> No.56517904

>>56514175
Just ride the wave anon and keep your fingers crossed, its oracle season. LINK and SUPRA to the moon.

>> No.56518277

>>56514175
Its oracle season, hang in there. WAGMI

>> No.56518515

>>56514380
Pinch yourself in 2030. Let me guess, only losers invest that long? Every web giant took as long, unfortunately you have brain worms

>> No.56518711

>>56516426
link is the only reason crypto is going to keep increasing in market cap
if link isn't successful, all of crypto is just going to stagnate
so yeah, you better hope link is "something special" or you should just invest in stocks

>> No.56518798

>>56514380
you stink

>> No.56520182

>>56514175
i'm starting to think your a fuckin DOINK for brains

>> No.56520223

>>56515936
In LINK’s second cycle it went to $53 vs its first cycle it topped at like $2 or something. This is its third cycle.

Also

> muh cycle

Dumb.

>> No.56520484

>>56515936
>source: was there for defi summer shitcoin bullrun