did he betray us?

[Anonymous No.56413700]

[Anonymous No.56413928]

he promised nothing to (and especially doesn't have any liability toward) anyone, so he can't betray by definition. he tried promising things once with ccip, but he stopped giving deadlines afterwards because he doesn't like it when his actions have consequences

[Anonymous No.56413940]

>>56413700
can you faggots stop making link threads already?

holy fuck make a general or kys, tired of you fucking niggers making a new thread every minute. faggot

[Anonymous No.56413958]

>>56413700
His idea wasn't bad. He just doesn't have the backbone to make it happen. Pair that with him coming off as a psued at times and I just don't think it will play out.
Most of Links pumping just coincides with bitcoin

[Anonymous No.56413964]

>>56413700
never bought into the link-jeet scam anon

[Anonymous No.56413972]

>>56413700
No. It’s in his nature.

[Anonymous No.56413980]

>>56413700
Well in my honest opinion I think he did, but if you ask any "Link Marine", Chainlink Advocate, or Chainlink Labs employee they will tell you that the token is not the business and they have no responsibility for your investment, even if you can prove that 500 employees are being paid 6-figs salaries thanks to the "we don't talk about it" token.

[Anonymous No.56414033]

>There once was a man named sergey who wanted to cross a river to get some bigmacs, but sergey cannot swim, so one day he asked a frog to carry him across. The frog hesitates, afraid that sergey might betray it, but sergey promises not to, pointing out that he would drown if he betrayed the frog in the middle of the river. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the man named sergey. Midway across the river, sergey betrays the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks sergey why he betrayed despite knowing the consequence, to which sergey replies: "I am sorry, but I couldn't resist the urge. It's in my nature."

[Anonymous No.56414059]

>>56413940
>hates chainlink
>enters every chainlink thread complaining about chainlink threads
>bumps them all to the top of the catalog

[Anonymous No.56415146]

>>56413940
Do you know where you are?

[Anonymous No.56415509]

>>56414033
this