This talk so was insanely bullish

[Anonymous No.56287287]

It was definitely the highlight of smartcon. After watching I have been reinvigorated, now I understand why /biz/ is dead and full of fud.

Honestly normies are going to wake up one day and see a new super highway with incredible design, consistency, flow, easy of use and things they never would have conceived of.

That's what's happening, the infrastructure that chainlink is building will be as if it just suddenly appeared one day to normies, and their lives will completely change.

Deo Gratias.

[Anonymous No.56287293]

>>56287287
>marketing copy from a company trying to sell you a product is bullish
you don't say

[Anonymous No.56287303]

HOW MANY DO I NEED I AM SLOWLY GOING INSANE FROM ALL THIS FUD WHEN THE FUCK DO I BUY BACK IN

[Anonymous No.56287331]

>>56287303
You should never have sold anon. The goal was always to only sell staking rewards. You want at least 1000 LINK, as that is the suicide stack.

The fud is literally nothing, do not respond to them.

[Anonymous No.56287339]

>>56287287
>chart
>$7
>not needed

You do realize old coins often don’t have a second run for the new bull right? Literally just losing money.

[Anonymous No.56287340]

>>56287287
same, it was a pretty motivating speech from a builder perspective as well

[Anonymous No.56287351]

>>56287287
the quality of kemal shows how chainlink is in a different league to everything

[Anonymous No.56287381]

linkies are not allowed to be happy
got any questions? pic fucking related

[Anonymous No.56287439]

>>56287351
He’s probably their best hire. He’s an even better speaker than Sergey.

[Anonymous No.56287446]

>>56287340
>>56287351
Thanks anon for the good replies. And thanks for ignoring the fudders. They might start taking to themselves to fake engagement and derail.

Let's keep this thread professional.

[Anonymous No.56287474]

>>56287287
Really makes you wonder why the token price does not reflect this

[Anonymous No.56287480]

>>56287439
I think it has to with the content. Kemel was basically making all the announcements, and all the nice numbers and milestones. It's good to see the project coming along.

A little disappointed that /biz/ has such little discussion.

[Anonymous No.56287482]

>>56287439
Isn't he muslim though?

[Anonymous No.56287502]

>>56287480
We had some solid live as it happened threads but yeah, not a huge amount of follow up discussion.
I would honestly say that Chainlink alone are responsible for 50% of the meaningful development happening in crypto at the moment.
The whole settlement meme sounds like last cycle's news.

[Anonymous No.56287515]

>>56287446
>professional.
Indeed.

[Anonymous No.56287516]

>>56287287
>Two more weeks

Always a carrot on a stick so that founders can use retail as exit liquidity

[Anonymous No.56287519]

Can someone link the talk?

[Anonymous No.56287525]

>>56287519
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY67WdueW5Y
Get hype son we're on the ground floor.

[Anonymous No.56287559]

The Oku example in the Kemal talk is also fucking crazy. Or, more accurately, the fucking crazy part is that people willingly traded on platforms that could scamwick past their limit order/stop loss without filling or executing it.
Talk about the bad old days, holy shit it's been a shitshow up until now.

[Anonymous No.56287565]

Decentralization has completely failed. What we need is a new centralized AI backed system.

[Anonymous No.56287571]

>>56287502
Biz is bitter as fuck.

[Anonymous No.56287593]

>>56287525
>consumers will demand verifiability
>Why would you use an app if you're a consumer, that you cannot verify?
Have these people met the average niggercattle consumer? Nobody cares about this autistic crap

[Anonymous No.56287817]

>>56287559
Yes oku is a huge deal, i wonder if they have a token? I saw it and was happy we finally can have a good dex experience.
>>56287593
Oh they will
>Pic relates

[Anonymous No.56287823]

>>56287559
this would happen on FTX

[Anonymous No.56287834]

>>56287823
Oh on binance when link hit $0.001

[Anonyous No.56287885]

>>56287287
link to talk?

[Anonymous No.56287893]

>>56287303
wait until $0.20. might take few years we get there tho

[Anonymous No.56287942]

[Anonymous No.56287951]

>smartcon
not even hiding it

[Anonymous No.56288054]

>>56287571
No one is bitter after seeing the LINK chart baggie

[Anonymous No.56288237]

>>56287885
See
>>56287525

[Anonymous No.56288266]

>>56287331
I sold at $42 and bought back at $11. Don’t regret that and holding now.

[Anonymous No.56288271]

Bullish as fuck. Biz hates winning, it’s simple

[Anonymous No.56288376]

>>56288266
Good job anon, hopefully you country isn't too retarded when it comes to taxes. Also many anons have less than 10k link so they don't want to risk swinging timing the market.

[Anonymous No.56288452]

Remember defi summer anons? Back then chainlink was providing it's services.FOR FREE. Now that is no longer the case;
>You want price feeds?
Pay up
>You want data streams?
Pay up
>You want CCIP?
Pay up
>You want Functions?
Pay up
>You want VRF?
Pay up
>Automation?
Pay up
>Deco (soon™)
Pay up

Can't pay? You can always hand over a small portion of your supply to chainlink or to vcs. VCs are more likely to screw you, chainlink's deal is better.

Also
>70+ projects testing CCIP im 3 MONTHS
>THREE MONTHS

Answer me this anons. How many build projects are there currently?

Also 2700+ dev applicants wanting to use automation. OOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.56288463]

>>56288452
>pay up
To Sergey, not to token holders >>56287474

[Anonymous No.56288471]

>>56288452
>Also 2700+ dev applicants wanting to use automation. OOOOOOOOOO
I made a mistake

It's 2800+ and it's for functions not automation.

[Anonymous No.56288474]

>>56288452
have you looked into any of the build partners. they almost all suck

[Anonymous No.56288580]

>>56288471
Once again, all coming from the uncirculating supply, that's just more sell pressure on the token

[Anonymous No.56288662]

>>56288474
I'm working on a crypto project that doesn't actually need a native token for anything, but it relies heavily on Chainlink infra so we're discussing creating a token for the sole purpose of being able to buy into BUILD. It's actually a perverse incentive when you consider that we would not even be considering a token if it weren't for BUILD.

[Anonymous No.56288691]

>>56288452
>Answer me this anons. How many build projects are there currently?
Alright anons, the answer is 50+

So you are going to have literally dozens of coins in your portfolio. My build portfolio will be separate from my main just so I can see how well they do. Sure some projects may not work out, but some will.

If you have at least 1000 LINK, you will be fine playing around with 50+ coins. It will give you something to do.

>So anon what do you do for a living
>I manage an investment portfolio consisting of over 100 assets in the latest "blank"
Some more eloquent anons can fill in the blank and make this statement sound better so you don't have to tell normies that you hold the most valuable asset in the world, chainlink (seriously do not tell people you own this).

[Anonymous No.56288699]

>>56288662
Anom you should watch last years smartcon talk with eric, built in Tokenomics is a very powerful thing, if you want your project to succeed over competitors you will want to really think about this.

[Anonymous No.56288706]

>>56287303
10k suicide stack

[Anonymous No.56288759]

>>56288662
a strong majority of build projects have probably done exactly that. lots of "governance" on that list. it is perverse but if you can avoid securities law, you might as well make one. afaik it's not a requirement of build that you make a market for your token.
good luck with your project anon

[Anonymous No.56288816]

>>56288759
>requirement of build that you make a market for your token.
I'm gonna put this out there for and Dev anons.

It's quite simple. Will your project make revenue?
If your project makes no money it will die, as you will eventually need to pay for chainlinks services, the build program is only free to help your project get up on it's feet.

Ok so now, your must makes revenue. How do you plan to pay the developers? If you decide to leave the project who will maintain it? Upgrade it? Keep improving it as chainlink offers more and more services?

Proper Tokenomics is essential for any project to succeed in the long term. Yes lots of build projects will be shit coins but the few that aren't will moon. And you all know what that means in crypto, only 1 moon Mission is enough. And you will literally have hundreds if not thousands and ten thousands (if you think about function's use cases) of opportunities for a moon mission.

[Anonymous No.56288819]

>>56287339
It was true for all those shitcoins with no real use

[Anonymous No.56288828]

>>56288816
>for and
for some*

[Anonymous No.56288835]

>>56288816
GMX is a perfect example. You must stake your GMX to earn protocol revenue.

[Anonymous No.56288848]

>>56288835
It's an unregistered security. SEC will go after them

[Anonymous No.56288890]

>>56288816
you don't need a token to earn revenue. see: uniswap or any of the dozens of overvalued governance tokens minted by revenue generating protocols.

[Anonymous No.56289012]

>>56288890
That is true but you need to consider how future devs will take over. And of course competition. If holding a dex coin gives me some of it's revenue then I would rather hold that than a only governance coin. Don't forget with CCIP liquidity problems will change. This also allows competition to have an opportunity to defeat existing and current projects.

[Anonymous No.56289258]

>>56287287
Kemal is really fantastic, I honestly look forward to him speaking more than Sergey.

[Anonymous No.56289360]

>>56289258
Me too. As anon mentioned above he does get the juicier content. Sergey just talks grand mission statement while Kemal as head of product gets to talk about the cool new releases, but he's also by far the most charismatic and entertaining speaker than Chainlink has as well.

[Anonymous No.56289656]

>>56287571
I'm not bitter. All the crumbs are now baked loaves and then some. All we need to do is wait.

[Anonymous No.56289729]

>he does the jeet "just draw a line going up" prediction
>marines think this is bullish

dear lord have mercy on your souls

[Anonymous No.56289775]

>>56289360
Yes, but when one considers the near term growth of chainlink with things getting into mainnet like data streams, functions and CCIP, you know things are gonna be ok and comfy. Also fuddies haven't got much (you)s hehe.

[Anonymous No.56290422]

>10-20 years
>Insanely bullish
kek baggie

[Anonymous No.56290453]

>>56290422
Our children will be so lucky

[Anonymous No.56292420]

>>56288474
they suck? damn, that means they won't moon for sure. sucky worthless coins NEVER moon

[Anonymous No.56292996]

>>56287303
no rush...IMO this is going under $4 by q1 '24

I'm seeing more layoffs across the board and households are continuing to cut back with the higher rate environment. People's savings are depleted, auto loan defaults are up, and credit card debt is at all time highs. The housing market is still in a standoff due to supply issues, but with continued layoffs the damn is going to open and markets will take another leg down.

[Anonymous No.56293007]

>>56287516
yeah exactly... the chart looks like a fifth grader drew it. They didn't even label years on the bottom axis, classic.

[Anonymous No.56293032]

>>56288816
>revenue

that's what the token is for...You sell investors your fraud "use case" and then cash out when it pumps. Just like Link

[Anonymous No.56293034]

>>56292996
that’s a bullish scenario for institutions to absolutely rape retail

[Anonymous No.56293076]

>>56292996
i agree with you, but i anticipate link to still go up, as big money will see it as a safe place to park their funds

[Anonymous No.56293220]

>>56288471
Which is more interesting than Automation since Functions is what Chainlink initially sold themselves on; bring a JSON parser (calling APIs for blockchains). This is where the more interesting applications will be needing.

And those same developers can also use Automation anyway.

[Anonymous No.56295183]

Bump

https://twitter.com/ThoughtsFromH/status/1709942186496905225

This is with only a few projects in general access

[Anonymous No.56295215]

>>56287287
>line go up then go up more! bullish!

[Anonymous No.56295463]

>>56287303
as many as you can afford
and then some more

[Anonymous No.56295484]

>>56287474
>most globalist coin out there
>midwits think it's a neo nazi coin
amazing

[Anonyous No.56296232]

>>56288237
much obliged

[Anonymous No.56296267]

>>56295484
We know what it is. It's obviously not a Nazi coin. That was always misdirection to keep people from buying it and keep the price suppressed for as long as possible. You can laugh at that if you want, but it obviously worked on that bankless podcast faggot.

[Anonymous No.56296278]

>>56296267
yea true, suppose i'm being fooled by the messaging a little myself

[Anonymous No.56296312]

>>56296278
You're alright, anon.
I hate the international finance system as much as the next guy, but if they're picking something to win, I want a slice of the pie.

[Anonymous No.56296341]

>>56296312
>I want a slice of the pie
You literally have a moral responsibility to get a slice of the pie.

[Anonymous No.56296343]

>>56296312
>if they're picking something to win, I want a slice of the pie
damn right

[Anonymous No.56296748]

>>56296341
Yes we have a responsibility to use our future Wealth wisely, for good, and for God's glory. Not like the current rich, who spend their wealth foolishly on vanity and degenerate behaviour, and many also got their wealth by sinful manner.

[Anonymous No.56296793]

>>56287474
I love this fuddie meme, it underscores their utter incompetence. As if we didn't know there were 1B tokens when we bought in

[Anonymous No.56296827]

>>56296793
It also presumes that there's a meaningful difference between 350m or 1b tokens when it comes to something as grand, as absolutely monumental, as Chainlink.
>oh I would buy the interconnective mycelium to all global trade if it had a supply of 350m, but not at 1b nonono that's not worth it at all
lmao

[Anonymous No.56297227]

>>56296341
indeed

[Anonymous No.56297239]

>>56287287
>moving tokens from A to B is going to make me a billionaire!
lmfao?

[Anonymous No.56297441]

to be fair a really high iq is needed to truly appreciate chainlink so i cant blame normies falling victim to fud

[Anonymous No.56297544]

>>56287287
https://youtu.be/N8cD8TmpvMg?si=JtiZOE-Yy45TrDlm

This talk is short but also based.

[Anonyous No.56297636]

>>56297441
The fuck does he need the key for, he can obviously fit between the bars

[Anonymous No.56297665]

>>56297544
Also
https://youtu.be/2aDUgPN25js?si=Ie2v2Dzv5hdMs2iS

The Hong Kong is extremely important. The summarise
>HK wants to keep their leading positions in the financial sector
>"There's no choice, we have to embrace this, we have to make sure we capture this opportunity to stay ahead of the game"
>"We do walk our talk"

[Anonymous No.56297705]

>>56297665
Hong Kong guy also said something amazing
>by population of ultra high enough individuals who have more than 30 million USD worth, I think quite a lot of you are of that bracket
>Hong kong is the biggest in the world, new york second

[Anonymous No.56298185]

>>56287303
Buy and wait, don't wait to buy, and you should also include the likes of UTK and CYMI which are also promising alts

[Anonymous No.56298406]

>>56293034
Institutions don't care, so don't expect them not to do what will favor them

[Anonymous No.56298487]

>>56298185
Those are some nice crypto payment tokens

[Anonymous No.56298512]

>>56297665
call me racist but chinks love to gamble bro

[Anonymous No.56298585]

>>56298512
racist!

[Anonymous No.56298615]

>>56287480
we had 6 years of fucking nothing but discussions there is nothing left to discuss

[Anonymous No.56298644]

>>56287287
Idk why I'm about to ask a genuine question on biz in 2023 let alone a LINK thread but is anyone else concerned by the fact that the Twitter influencer sell target is $100? Seems every account is pushing that. It's frankly an insufficient ceiling for that kind of mental sell pressure especially when sized against ATH. If $100 is the aspiration spoken in open air to rally buys... kind of pitiful considering that's usually an indication of the price you absolutely need to frontrun to secure profit, setting aside the fact it's a downward revision on last cycle.

[Anonymous No.56298657]

>>56297239
literally everything in this retarded space stems from solving the problem of moving tokens from a to b
so… yes probably

[Anonymous No.56298689]

>>56298644
Normies always sell before the full moon Mission. The normies I know think link will hit $200 in the bullrun, they also fall for the btc halving meme.

[Anonymous No.56298700]

>>56298512
This, in my experience they are in general willing to take more risks than westerners.

[Anonymous No.56298703]

>>56298185
>t.

[Anonymous No.56298748]

>>56287287
Shill dot to a retard (me)

[Anonymous No.56298785]

>>56297636
By eating the bread he fattens himself up to sergey levels and can't escape the prison he subconsciously wants to be in.

[Anonymous No.56298788]

>>56298689
To be fair, I could comfortably retire at $200. I won't, but I could.

[Anonymous No.56298837]

>>56287559
You remind me now of when there was a Link flash crash on Binance and Binance left a limit order at like 0.001 cents or something, saying it was there right after they launched the Link pairing and never bothered to take it down. Binance or whoever owned the limit order scooped up like a million Link tokens while everyone else could only set limit orders at as low as probably $2 at the time (I honestly can't remember the price floor you could set an order to).

I would say Binance' days are numbered, but they can survive for a bit longer for storing peoples' crypto.

[Anonymous No.56298892]

>>56298837
Even if it was CZ who did that, he deserves a place in the citadel for pulling that stunt off. If anything, it just proved the case for Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.56298921]

>>56297441

I bet this faggot watches rick and morty.

[Anonymous No.56298946]

>>56297705
>>by population of ultra high enough individuals who have more than 30 million USD worth, I think quite a lot of you are of that bracket
Anons need to realise the implications of this statement
>Most smartcon attendees have over 30 million USD
>now compare the average anon to them

[Anonymous No.56300294]

>>56297544
this is probably the best smartcon talk i've ever heard

[Anonymous No.56300351]

>>56298946
What does it mean

[Anonymous No.56300491]

>>56297705
>>56298946
i understand yet i dont understand

[Anonymous No.56300919]

>>56298946
$30,000,000 / 10,000 LINK = TOKEN NOT NEEDED

[Anonymous No.56302729]

>Chainsink
>Chain shit
>Link submarines
>Down 90%
>TNN
>Token not needed
>Chart
>1x in 3 years
>Scam
>65% premine
>Sergey dumps
>700k binance
>2 more weeks
>HR roasties
>Pumps the least dumps the most
>Kek baggies
>Fake partnerships
>Pump and dump
>Bagholders
>Cuckolds
>Pay up paypigs
>Fat Sergey
>Linktranny
>You will never make it
>Down vs btc
>Down vs eth
>Nft gaming
>Shitcoin
>Underperformer
>I can't perform
>Chaincels
>Linkcels
>African wfh devs
>WEF globohomo
>Cult members
>Saturn worshippers
>Chainlinkgod incel
>Klaus Schwab
>Sirgay
>Women in crypto
>Refugees welcome woke
>Missed the entire bullrun
>Outperformed by dog coins
>ERC 19 downgrade
>No adoption
>Ccip flop
>Staking flop
>14% inflation
>Token not needed
>Cuck cage link marines
>$50 Top buyers
>Fell for lpl rug
>Fell for bancor
>Fell for Celsius
>Got btfo by bulgarians
>Nexo won
>Shorted by Simeon
>Zeus capital
>$50->$5
>Bagheld for 7 years
>No link holder made it
>Fell from rank 5
>Subsidized by dumping on baggies
>Sergey cult antichrist
>Ccip tranny
>Chainlink shill team 6
>Paid community advocates
>Bagholder support group
>All smart OGs left
>Gm based king clg
>Eric Schmidt yacht payment
>gravelcoin
>Nft partnerships
>Team owe you nothing
>Cayman islands shell company
>Link is an unregistered security
>Chris barret running
>Chris barret flexing
>Francisco smartcon threat
>Russian scammer
>Smart Con
>Chainlink FTX endorsement
>90% of baggies in negative profits
>Link shorted by everyone
>Rorys wife's black son
>Swift announcement dump
>Shadow fork
>Stockholm syndrome
>Missed the 2021 bullrun
>Dead 2017 shitcoin
>Every narrative failed
>Bulgarians -> VCs
>Token not needed
>Down 90%
>Kek baggies

[Anonymous No.56302745]

>>56302729
>t. Bought the top

[Anonymous No.56303230]

>>56287287
So when is the inflection point?

[Anonymous No.56303244]

avalanches network far superior to chain link eth network ,, 4channel do not fall for chain link scam.

[Anonymous No.56304570]

>>56303230
10-15 years from now

[Anonymous No.56304814]

>>56288706
What's the make-it stack anon, maybe I'd add it to my Ithuem and Ride which have been building during the bear market.

[Anonymous No.56305143]

>>56304570
Doubt it. LINK compatibility will hit critical mass when legacy systems are interoperable with the new system. Pressure to switch to the new system will ramp up exponentially which is why HK is leading right now. I'd say once LINK and ISO20022 + standard web2 integrate it will begin.

> < 5 years

[Anonymous No.56305470]

>>56304570

[Anonymous No.56305738]

>>56300351
>>56300491
>>56300919
>by population of ultra high enough individuals who have more than 30 million USD worth, I think quite a lot of you are of that bracket
>>56304814
10k is the make it stack. 1k suicide stack. They are trying to fud you out by lying about the stack size.

[Anonymous No.56305755]

https://www.statestreet.com/web/solutions/documents/globallink-digital-product-sheet.pdf

[Anonymous No.56305778]

>>56296793
>ask a question about why the price doesnt reflects the supposed value?
>doesnt answer the question

[Anonymous No.56305791]

>>56287293
Fpbp fuck link spam and fuck mods for not doing shit about it

[Anonymous No.56306876]

>>56305791
This is a link board

[Anonymous No.56307068]

>>56305738
>10k is the make it stack. 1k suicide stack. They are trying to fud you out by lying about the stack size.

Those were the stacks based on the idea that Chainlink would hit $1K.

Everyone (including Sergey and Steve), underestimated how big Chainlink and the industry is going to be.

[Anonymous No.56307566]

>>56307068
Doesn't matter. The stack sizes don't change.

[Anonymous No.56307961]

>>56307566
yes they do, no one accounted for CCIP, 10k make it was based on a link max of $1k, which everyone assumed just based on link being a decentralized oracle

no one predicted CCIP and 18 decimal places and everything else

[Anonymous No.56307989]

Whos more delusional

Xrp baghodler

Link marine

[Anonymous No.56308278]

>>56307961
1k = suicide. The real question is when moon...

[Anonymous No.56308498]

5g shroom trip is telling me to all in

[Anonymous No.56308656]

>>56308498
it'll happen more suddenly than anyone can even predict

[Anonymous No.56308734]

>>56298837
Cz can get fucked. He's just as much of a scammer as bankman. He's also extremely unprofessional. The other day he was making comments about individual user accounts and transactions. What the fuck is he thinking. We all know bnb is a centralised shit coin too. The only place in the citadel he will find is in a stockade for linkies to throw shit in his face for all eternity.

>>56307961
18 decimal places were one of the first things discussed you fucking new fag. The exact token structure was discussed endlessly. The fact it was not just an erc20. Ccip was hinted many years ago.

We've had 6 years of dozens of daily link threads. Every crumb was salivated after. It's only recently a lot of old fags have taken a back seat and said there's no more to be done. It's here, it's working its ready. The loaves are baked and the store is open now people just need to wake up to the smell and not just imagine it

[Anonymous No.56309437]

>>56295183
My brother worked in a local supermarket, it would make revenue of a few million in a year, 100k in 3 months is absolutely fucking nothing for something with an mcap in the billions

[Anonymous No.56309458]

>>56309437
Did your brother's supermarket have only two clients who only did part of their shopping there?
Mainnet is extremely restricted still.

[Anonymous No.56309565]

>>56309437
Now tell us the profit. Probably super slim margins. Jesus christ at least spend 30 minutes looking up economics 101. Yes lad chainlink is like your Bulgarian supermarket

[Anonymous No.56311497]

>>56308734
the only question really is what will it do in this next very imminent cycle or do we have to wait for 2029
might even never look back and decouple from grandpa shitcoin
image the seethe as people sell at 100 because it just has to crash 90% again and then it just doesnt

[Anonymous No.56311611]

>>56311497
stop thinking in terms of "cycles"
this isn't 2017 anymore
BTC isn't going to moon to 200k in 2024 because muh halvening. it's priced in

[Anonymous No.56311821]

>>56311611
listen here you stupid moron

btc to 200k in 2024 is a real thing that is going to happen and it's definitely not been priced in there is so much more room for btc to grow and the halvenings do matter as they reduce supply in turn driving up price if you don't get it then just shut up and go back to investing in your meme stocks and nft monkey pictures

[Anonymous No.56312028]

Question to the stinkies here.
Will staking rewards include a portion of the CCIP fees (if not in this iteration, is it planned for later)?
If not at all, where do they go?

[Anonymous No.56312062]

>>56312028
yes

[Anonymous No.56312146]

>>56312028
>As Chainlink Staking expands over time to support more oracle services, such as CCIP, a portion of the user fees paid for those services are planned to be directed to stakers in exchange for increasing the service’s cryptoeconomic security.

https://blog.chain.link/ccip-mainnet-early-access/

[Anonymous No.56312155]

>>56312146
Thanks, I read the CCIP fees portion and the staking 0.2v blog, and it didn't mention that anywhere.

[Anonymous No.56312159]

>>56308278
You heard it here first folks, link will never go over 1k at most.
Meanwhile in reality the value prop could easily justify 5 figure link assuming majority of the total supply staked and all efforts/endeavors successful

[Anonymous No.56312279]

>>56311611
they said that every time
it was wrong every time

[Anonymous No.56312855]

>>56308734
>unprofessional

Haha, the fuck does that mean anymore? Every corporation pushes an agenda to encourage people to be a faggot and/or undergo operations to attempt to become the opposite sex.

[Anonymous No.56312857]

>>56312159
I think you misunderstood his post

[Anonymous No.56312871]

>>56309565
Classic biz irony
>margin
Lmao Chainlink runs at a $100M+ op loss every year. Take a look in the mirror

>>56311611
Heard the same in 2019. “Too many people know about crypto now, cycles are dead”

>>56312159
Lets break $10 first before the fantasy projections return. It’s going to be a monumental task to get back to $20-25 in the next few years. There’s going to be a shitload of selling pressure from all the trapped bagholders and as mentioned previously, there wont be cheap money due to macro environment.

[Anonymous No.56312880]

>>56311611
>This time its different!

[Anonymous No.56313001]

>>56312857
No I understand it. I mean sure 10k/1k is the original. But are we in 2017 still or are we in 2023 with confirmations and a greater understanding?
>>56312871
Yes, short goals first. 1k impossible without filly matured network and staking. But 1k is to 10k what 35 was to 52. I dont think itll take years to get to 25. BTC will drag everything up when it runs. If it doesnt have a bull run then itll die and so will crypto until link's industrial adoption revives the scene at which point link will be #1, the btc narrative dead, and buidlers come back to chase the dragon once more.

[Anonymous No.56314755]

>>56313001
Stack sizes were determined by what a reasonable person (especially since most of this board is probably 35 and below) could invest at around the ico range price. 1k link being suicide because in terms of USD value it was basically nothing to even a 20 year old mcdonalds worker.

investing big money into chainlink in 2017 and during the radio silence period of 2018 would be absurdly high risk. Nothing was confirmed, there wasn't even a product. Now 5 years later we have basically non stop media from chainlink and other partners like Vodafone and ANZ. We have full confirmation of a working system that has run flawlessly for years. We know the entire team is filled with gigabrains coming from other established companies with impressive resumes . We have multiple services like ccip, vrf, functions. We can see documentation for developers being first class. You can see the potential revenue for these services being high.

I simply don't know at all where the price can go to. That's a matter of speculation.
It's clear most of the crypto guys don't even understand what chainlink is truly. How can you expect 'retail' to even understand it since retail really has no place in this system. They aren't part of the equation at all unless you're talking about speculative price action.

I can only see chainlink standing alone at rank 1. So I'll continue to buy more.

[Anonymous No.56314865]

>>56314755
>investing big money into chainlink in 2017 and during the radio silence period of 2018 would be absurdly high risk
I bought because the fat sergey memes were funny. sometimes your worst decisions end up being your best ones.

[Anonymous No.56314954]

>>56314865
My first buy was 2k LINK purely because I saw a meme about the business cards from American Psycho. I knew nothing about crypto at the point, I hadn't even heard of Ethereum and I was worried that Binance could be a scam. After that I actually read the white paper, realised it was going to absorb the entire financial system, became an unironic Chainlink maxi and started buying more until a total of around 20k. I made a risk decision back in '18 that I shouldn't put my entire life savings into it like some other anons, and looking back at it rationally that was good decision, but hindsight is 20/20 and I could have had well over 100k if I actually bought big at the right time.

[Anonymous No.56315358]

Bump
Bump
Bump
Señora
Bump your linky thread
Bump
Bump
Bump
Senora
Bump it all the time

[Anonymous No.56315647]

To the JDF who monitors and influences these posts.

I will donate all the profits I make from LINK to the Israeli War Bond if your people stop supressing the price.

[Anonymous No.56317666]

[Anonymous No.56318707]

>>56287287
>Chainlink brings data, compute and cross-chain services
Does that mean that they want to make L2's obsolete?
Or will it be like a convenient upsell-deal for someone who is already using Link price feeds?

[Anonymous No.56318778]

>>56318707
Depends on the bbca layer

[Anonymous No.56319435]

>>56318778
Could you elaborate on that?

[Anonymous No.56319525]

>>56314755
Make it stacks were never 1k you nufag. Its allways been 10k

[Anonymous No.56321028]

>>56288471
I've used functions and it's honestly pretty awesome. I'm convinced functions will usher in the next bullrun as devs build new kinds of dapps. You'll be able to buy futures on literally everything. Sport matches, Dota 2 game results, news updates. Want to bet on whether it rains in Bangkok this weekend? Well now you can! - thanks to Functions secured by Chainlink TM.

[Anonymous No.56321233]

>>56319435
he's talking about dessert

[Anonymous No.56321307]

>>56319435
Chainlink is working on their own blockchain with a novel consensus algorithm. People are speculating what they'll do with that blockchain since trying to replace Ethereum is a fool's errand.

Another anon speculated they'll run a blockchain purely for logging behavioral data of node operators.

[Anonymous No.56321394]

>>56321307
>a blockchain purely for logging behavioral data of node operators.
then why would they choose an algorithm specifically designed to counter MEV? I think they want to offer sidechains/dappchains that are interoperable with ETH.

>trying to replace Ethereum is a fool's errand.
it's a dying chain with no real development. its L2s will suck up it's value and disperse it across sidechains and other L1s.

[Anonymous No.56321444]

>>56321028
Yeah functions.+ deco + ccip are extremely important. Add VRF to the mix... and automation.. the things about chainlinks services is that you are always going to use more than 1 to make your products better.

The potential usecases is actually insane.

[Anonymous No.56321465]

>>56319525
Yeah nice reading comprehension since I never wrote anything of the sort.

[Anonymous No.56321487]

>>56321307
Eth is literally a piece of poo. Gas is too expensive. Bitcoin will also die if they can't make revenue, high fees is also problem and doesn't fix the problem or paying miners, because people aren't going to use it if the fees are too high.

[Anonymous No.56321493]

>>56321307
Dahlia addresses it at the start of her SmartCon talk. She says that coordinating Chainlink node operators is similar to coordinating blockchain validators. The same sort of issues around consensus and bad actors apply to DONs as apply to blockchain validator sets.

[Anonymous No.56321565]

>>56321444
Checked

[Anonymous No.56322471]

>>56321493
Such as?

[Anonymous No.56322809]

>>56321028
>Be highly advanced country
>Create user profile on decentralized CBDC blockchain
>Have "deceased" variable for citizens, to flush them out of the system, if they died
>People bet on death of certain users
>Inevitably create manhunt scenario
I don't think it's a good thing tho, considering that CBDC user profiles will be great to counter election fraud

[Anonymous No.56324676]

>>56322809
Yup. Not to mention if the tokens held are programmed to move upon comfirmed death you have basically made a system to incentivize murder. No more dead wallets with tokens that dont move. They just get sent back to public liquidity pools if no inheritance smart contract was set up. Chainlink will legitimately have greater capacity for bad than good I am realizing.

[Anonymous No.56326055]

>>56312279
You're right anon. The real chads are already bagging more sats for gains when the bulls return. With the innovation from AA wallets, its become easier for me to secure and manage my asset.

[Anonymous No.56328351]

Bump

[Anonymous No.56328948]

>>56328351
/Biz/

[Anonymous No.56328963]

This thread is 4 days old for fuck sake. I am sick of seeing it in the catalog. I am assuming this is more news that wont actually pump the price of Link correct?

[Anonymous No.56328982]

>>56324676
Yeah sure people are gonna murder to fill liquidity pools

[Anonymous No.56329043]

>>56328982
>Aris new book now suddenly makes sense

[Anonymous No.56329502]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56329580]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56329636]

>>56317666
this is me checking the satanic digits of this post

[Anonymous No.56329650]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56329684]

>>56287287
Why'd i buy this pos again?

[Anonymous No.56329726]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56329749]

>>56307068
The estimation was 2-5k, but everything changed so much in 6 years I have no clue what it should be now.
Things like AI were never a part of that estimation.

[Anonymous No.56329792]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56329859]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56329924]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56329994]

Day Three of posting about Nyan Cat Money five hundred times per day until its over $1 each. Post Counter 98

[Anonymous No.56330061]

>>56329749
AI is fucking retarded so it probably lowers the price estimation by negative 1k eoy

[Anonymous No.56330072]

>>56329684
>back to 6.909
>my TA tells me where it's going, to a tenth of a cent, but i have no idea if it's going there
the power of TA retards

[Anonymous No.56330326]

>>56329749
>Things like AI were never a part of that estimation.

We had ideas discussing Chainlink being used to filter out false information and likening it if Google had to ability to search for only true information (does anyone have this post discussing this?) but yeah, AI, tech that absolutely NEEDS verifiably truthful information? Chainlink and blockchain tech is a godsend for it.

No wonder Eric Schmidt hopped on this team and why Sergey keeps pushing for Chainlink to become a truth machine.

[Anonymous No.56330339]

>>56330326
What if they.verify false information? Like saying that vaccines are safe and effective.

[Anonymous No.56330349]

>>56330339
Vaccines are safe and effective. Overpopulation is a massive problem. We need a Great Reset.
>we

[Anonymous No.56330385]

>>56330339
>What if they.verify false information?
Verify false information as truthful? Then there goes the whole truth machine goal going right down the drain.

[Anonymous No.56330428]

>>56330385
But cryptographic truth is not objective truth. We have to watch and see how truthful the 'truth' machine really is.

[Anonymous No.56330482]

>>56330428
It's not, but it's closer than anything we have before. And you can trace back to the source of the information to identify bad actors better, aka data sources with unreliable data.

[Anonymous No.56330579]

>>56329684
>>56330072
AVE has been one of the most accurate TA accounts for years now, highly underrated. He, like many others wants chainlink to succeed and can see the reasons why it should. But he puts no emotion in his charting. He only highlights the most probable paths and has been extremely consistent.

It's easy to misinterpret his "6.909" statement as a price target, what he is doing is highlighting the next level of support (The MA line that's currently lining up $6.909).

What's infuriating for us all is we can see the supporting paths to a high token value right in front of us, but the price refuses to budge out of the current trading rectangle.
The CL team has been doing a good job getting large clients interested, but the entire market is waiting for them to prove the solution is profitable and to have their network value reflected in the token (price).

Until the team discovers how to shift the value of their network under the token, it will likely continue to move sideways. Using the token as a temporary transactional item (something to be immediately converted from and to usd to facilitate a message) isn't valuable. It doesn't matter if they secure $100bn or $100qn if the token is never being used to store a level of value. Mechanisms such as staking (which is severely underbaked) is one of multiple methods to do this.

I just hope the team realises this in the near future and realise it's a big reason why the project is fudded (TNN).

[Anonymous No.56332053]

>>56330579
There was also the idea of a transaction tax.
They should copy Ethereum's mechanism with a burn and inflation mechanism focused on creating additional deflation with a predefined setting.
They could start with a 5% transaction tax and change it later to a more complex auto regulating model.

[Anonymous No.56332091]

>>56330339
It will prove that the false information has not been tempered with from the initial point.
An AI will be able to recognize the false information and trace it back to its source through Chainlink, then it will curse that source.

Imagine all the Jewish propagandists getting all their propaganda traced back to them and proved incorrect by an AI. They won't be able to hide and there will be absolute truth of their corruption which cannot be removed or tempered with in the AI world.

The Jewish history rewriting scam will be stopped and never again ill they be able to evade consequence for their actions.
Vax induced 2 sigma deviation with sudden death syndrome?

The AI supported insurance smart contracts will trigger the insurance and bankrupt the vax merchants and the entire chain of command responsible for it will be visible on chain and go to jail. No one will be able to evade consequences for their actions in this new world.