Trustless?

[Anonymous No.56188835]

How is something trustless if I'm "trusting" the fact that the code hasn't changed since the last time I interacted with any given contract?

[Anonymous No.56188840]

>thinking the code hasn't changed

[Anonymous No.56188935]

>>56188835
https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rdriley/487/papers/Thompson_1984_ReflectionsonTrustingTrust.pdf here you go anon
basically it was over in 1984, read the paper.

[Anonymous No.56188968]

>>56188835
unless you're invested in some centralized shitcoin, code doesn't just "change" without a fork

[Anonymous No.56189023]

kys spamming frogposting nigger

[Anonymous No.56189157]

>>56188935
Never heard of this, thanks anon

>>56188968
That is true, but I have a feeling the future is going to be rather centralized, sadly. But what's to stop someone from putting in a secret backdoor that allows them to change it, the fact that some autist will catch them by checking out the code?

[Anonymous No.56189192]

>>56188835
kek. You havent experienced shitcoin mania in 2021. Theres something called revoke ownership and posting the Source code on etherscan so that any nerd who knows code can ensure its safe.

The best part about it, is only high iq incels (essentially the ones that were smart enough to understand chainlink) will be able to be early to everything and be able to avoid all vulnerbilities.

while roasties and niggers get fucked

[Anonymous No.56189240]

>>56189192
Dang there are people on this board that didn't experience the elondoge era... But yeah no, when I was making this post my original thought was that I'm trusting nerds kek.

>Smart enough to sorta understand chainlink, too dumb to sell at $50

[Anonymous No.56191859]

>>56189157
np.
>But what's to stop someone from putting in a secret backdoor that allows them to change it, the fact that some autist will catch them by checking out the code?
that's it. the future of finance is powered by autism. gg no re

[Anonymous No.56191870]

>>56188835
Most of the major ones are open source