/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.5616523]

We had a thread yesterday when kucoin was being spammed about filters. Anons were posting their filters and about 9 out of 10 people had "LINK" filtered.
Can we just talk about this for a second? A huge, huge majority of this board is completely braindead and will miss the biggest moon mission of our lifetimes. Is there anything we can do for them?

[Anonymous No.5616544]

>>5616523

no they can stay poor idk.

[Anonymous No.5616553]

it's sad bro, I know. but we can't help these willfully lost sheep.

[Anonymous No.5616618]

>>5616523
SAD

[Anonymous No.5616668]

>>5616544
This

[Anonymous No.5616679]

>>5616523
maybe they're right that it's just a shit coin. Where's the Christmas surprise??

[Anonymous No.5616709]

>>5616679
>Where's the Christmas surprise??
Haha what?

[Anonymous No.5616811]

>>5616523

It's kinda great. /nubiz/ is mostly shut out of LINK. It really is the /ourcoin/ of people who have been here since August and earlier.

[Anonymous No.5616825]

>>5616523
who cares desu
chainlink is a promising project and the odds to moon are in links favour. there is no need to squeez some poorfags money into it like all those pnd scam coins

[Anonymous No.5616870]

>>5616825

Exactly. Let them buy Ripple and Verge. They can fomo into LINK when it's already pumped.

[Anonymous No.5616894]

I wish I could filter all the sexy sloots. Nofap is impossible when browsing this board

[Anonymous No.5616897]

>>5616523
That feeling you get when you know for sure something you have will moon.

Similar feelings of confidence were felt holding BTC ETH and IOTA early on.... same thing is occurring right now boys!

[Anonymous No.5616967]

>>5616523
Nothing is happening with LINK. There won't be a moon mission until February at the earliest.

[Anonymous No.5616968]

It still amazes me how this coin is still talked about after a single discord shilled it for a few days before an army of babies first scam, useful idiots get baited into constantly posting about it. Link is mostly filtered because it is a spam coin.

[Anonymous No.5617033]

>>5616968
Bro, you're safe ITT you don't need to fud here

[Anonymous No.5617060]

Braindeads.
Check the number of nodes and the number of circulating coins. To not make 90% of the coins useless a normal Price of 4Cent per link would be good.

[Anonymous No.5617096]

>>5616968
>>5617060

[Anonymous No.5617107]

>>5617060
What?

[Anonymous No.5617129]

>>5616523
Threads like this is why you faggots are filtered

>>5616811
>It really is the /ourcoin/ of people who have been here since August
Yeah, its the coin of newcoiners who went all in on the most shilled ICOs of august/september
Thats why so many link bagholders also got reqt by req and bought into shit like blackmoon and whatever that shitcoin that pulled an exitscam was, lmao

[Anonymous No.5617135]

>>5617060
damn, you know your shit.
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning

[Anonymous No.5617157]

>stinky linkies still clutching on to their bags

[Anonymous No.5617197]

>>5616968

[Anonymous No.5617199]

>>5617129
>Threads like this is why you faggots are filtered
Not by you apparently.

[Anonymous No.5617218]

>>5617129

Your FUD has no power here. We have seen the future.

[Anonymous No.5617239]

>>5617157

once this baby hits bittrex, you're gonna see some serious shit

>no more bot monopoly
>random 5x P+D's
>mass exposure
>millions of more potential buyers

You're gonna hate yourself for not storing some away now

[Anonymous No.5617261]

this is a shittoken
>muh swift
you realize swift is a dying company right?
why else would they look into a litteral ponzi scheme crypto market lmao

[Anonymous No.5617271]

>>5616523
Let it fucking go. Every 3rd thread is a link thread. It’s nevwr happening

[Anonymous No.5617337]

>>5617261
>swift is a dying company

[Anonymous No.5617376]

>>5617337
congratz you fell for the bait
nonetheless link is a shittoken and this wont go anywhere
lmao even ripple has blown you fags the fuck out the last week
its fucking over for you guys you even fell off the top 100 lmao

[Anonymous No.5617443]

>>5617376
Man you sure care a lot about this "dying shitcoin" if you're trying to make us sell this much. I guess you're just a good guy trying to prevent us from losing money.

[Anonymous No.5617449]

>>5617199
I like to make fun of stinkylinkies
Why would I filter you

>>5617337
They are though. Their infrastructure is outdated as fuck and overly expensive. A lot of their big name clients have been looking into alternatives with blockchain for a couple years now.

[Anonymous No.5617467]

I dunno I already made 3x so it’s chill. But ya the number of nodes number of coins concerns me I made a Reddit thread about it and downvotes to hell but there are good responses there you should read it. It’s convincing

[Anonymous No.5617479]

>>5617443
you wish haha
why would i want to buy link? tell me one fucking reason im just here to shit up your threads you spam 24/7 if you spam the board this is what you get
i put all my money into raiblocks at the beginning of the week and now have 50k you little mongoloid

[Anonymous No.5617507]

>>5617467
>the number of nodes number of coins concerns me
The what?

[Anonymous No.5617516]

Let them be, OP. They'll FOMO in soon enough. I was here after the DAO hack when posters here claimed ETH "will never be $15 again". The rest of 2016 ETH bled further and some posters even went as far as saying ETH "will never rise above $10 again". Rest assured they most likely FOMO bought in when ETH reached $20 then subsequently sold when it hit $50, only for it to go to $100 and beyond. The patient shall be rewarded.

[Anonymous No.5617562]

>>5617479
Wow look at the big boy with 50k here.
I have just that in LINK and that's 25% of my portfolio. You look at top 20 and all you see is total trash shitcoins. LINK is barely top 100 and it's better than 90% of the trash in top 100. Make out of that whatever you want.

[Anonymous No.5617585]

>>5617507
The fucking nodes to coins ratio

[Anonymous No.5617610]

>>5617585
What the fuck are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.5617623]

>>5617562
50k link here. Keep thinking of doubling up but been holding off. Will keep buying small amounts so not to get too burned if we fall

[Anonymous No.5617650]

>>5616811
Been here since July and I can confirm this.

[Anonymous No.5617662]

>>5617610
Bitch. You have a billion fucking coins. How many nodes you expect there to be. Maybe you don’t understand how CL works?

[Anonymous No.5617681]

>>5617562
link hasnt even a working product you fucking degenerate
its all proof of concept
2 guys team no dev im convinced that steve guy doesent even exist
sergey doesent even visit the slack regularly all you guys got have the rory cuck
but damn you have 50k locked up in that shittoken meanwhile shits mooning left and right
i cant wait to check links price in a year just to see its still worthless

[Anonymous No.5617705]

>>5617650
Def our cook for those of non newbies but those of us who weren’t around early enough for ETH

[Anonymous No.5617746]

>>5616523

Chainlink reminds me of my ex girlfriend... Is the universe conspiring to bring us back together or am I fully delusional, and If I am right about Chainlink am I right about my ex?

t. 150k LINK holder

[Anonymous No.5617751]

>>5617662
When? At first or in a few years when CL goes mainstream?

[Anonymous No.5617774]

>>5617467

I rewatched an interesting video recently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrlL5v78FtA Sergey says swift member banks currently pay services 10 to 20 million a year for the same sort of data and security that chainlink oracles would provide.

If you assume perhaps they're looking to cut that number in half to 5 million USD a year, divide that by a thousand nodes (probably more than needed and certainly more than there will be initially) that's $5000 a year going to each node just for interest rate data from SWIFT member banks.

This is just speculative and probably totally wrong but what's a good return on a node that seems likely? Perhaps 5% best case then each node would be required to have around $100,000 worth of tokens (this seems unreasonable, but if you try and consider how running a node wouldn't be unreasonably lucrative I wonder how it could be less).

Just looking at that 5k number, which doesn't even include any of the other potential uses, such as insurance, REQ, OMG, CEEK, all the dapps that will come from zeppelinOS, you can see that we're talking serious money and serious reason to acquire link to make your node more reputable, which means a high demand for the tokens.

I think the value of the token fud is some of the strongest just because we have no idea how much they can expect to make for operating nodes, especially initially if there aren't a lot of contracts coming through, but if sergey comes through with huge implementations off the bat the token will go lunar through speculation, but more importantly actual utility, which is extremely rare among the thousands of tokens out there. Also please tell me if I'm talking shit.

[Anonymous No.5617821]

>>5617060
19.000 people signed up willing to be a node operator
350mill circulating supply
Your point is... You're retarded?

[Anonymous No.5617882]

>>5617681
Smartcontract.com literally offering oracles right now.
Testnet of LINK in Q1 2018.
Sergey regularly appearing on conferences (SIBOS, DEVCON)
Multiple team members, you are a retard if you think there are only two.
Massive partnerships with companies like SWIFT and even other coins like Request network.
ZeppelinOS (working with OmiseGO and other big coins) calling link "industry leader" and having a partnership with them.
LINK in works for 3+ years.

If you are unironically not all in on link there is something seriously wrong with your life and you deserve to be poor.

[Anonymous No.5618006]

>>5617774

>I think the value of the token fud is some of the strongest just because we have no idea how much they can expect to make for operating nodes

I don't think you need to get too specific about it, to be honest. You need to remember that token value is often a reflection of the perceived value of the total ecosystem, not just the transactional value of liquid tokens.

While there will be a solid core of LINK tokens transferring value to node operators, the market is also going to respond to the fact that ChainLink is performing millions and eventually billions of dollars worth of work. There's a reason people talk about this being a 2020 hold. After the first cohort of node operators start turning large profits then more and more people will want to get on board. New node operators will feel that they need substantial LINK holdings to counteract the fact they are late to the game. OG node operators will want large stacks to consolidate their competitive advantage.

The entire ChainLink ecosystem and investors and speculators are going to be competing to hold LINK tokens and that competition will create buy pressure. Don't get too bogged down in the idea that "x nodes will only need x tokens" because this project is going to be absolutely massive and the market will respond to that.

[Anonymous No.5618036]

>>5616811
Been invested since 2014 you fucking newfag. LINK is a shitcoin but you sub 10 IQ brainlets woudn't know.

[Anonymous No.5618051]

Also it's nice to have a LINK thread with so few retards in it. Turns out those filters actually work great, haha.

[Anonymous No.5618089]

>>5618036

I've consumed most of the material relating to it since pre-ICO, I'm happy to take you up on any particular aspect if you actually want to discuss things. You're wasting your time just saying "shitcoin LOL" in a thread where people actually know what they're talking about.

[Anonymous No.5618140]

I see the 10,000 number floating around for the node operators. Anyone have a citation? Because that's what I'm shooting for.

[Anonymous No.5618169]

>>5618089
truth i think the only people still fudding just want cheap linkies before it moons

[Anonymous No.5618190]

>>5618036
>>5618089

FINISH HIM

[Anonymous No.5618200]

>>5618140
https://medium.com/@sergeynazarov/chainlink-an-overview-and-our-focus-14f03335b803

[Anonymous No.5618267]

Helllo? Set the buy... 1 MILLION LINKIES
>the call that saved crypto

[Anonymous No.5618304]

>>5618006

oh yea I have no doubt speculation will send it to the moon once the word spreads, but if the price (not the network and token itself which will keep operating not matter what happens) is going to have staying power that makes it somewhat immune to the inevitable bubble popping and great washout of the true shitcoins it needs to be solidly valuable and have utility.

I'm holding 30k myself and I know I want to hold as long as possible so as not wanting to neck myself when it keeps going up far beyond what i thought was possible and not have to worry so much about my token value dropping 90% because most of the value was in fact speculative, regardless of the fantastic success of the chainlink network, so it's interesting to try and establish a baseline for what the actual value of the token is.

[Anonymous No.5618383]

Anyone here running a node? I have one running in a VPS right now, but I can't find any guides on how to connect it to the external adaptors.

[Anonymous No.5618422]

>>5618200
>>5618140

Sergey said he only expected a small number of the 19k signups to convert and only a fraction of that was needed initially so 10k would be very high I would think.

For comparison, Bitcoin has around 6k full nodes, but then there is not really an incentive to run a bitcoin node like there would be with a chainlink node. Also chainlink nodes are significantly more technically complicated and require more effort (thomas said he wouldn't use a residential powerline for example) than a btc node. I have no idea about what the number would be initially, certainly probably less than 1k I would guess at least for the first year.

[Anonymous No.5618494]

>>5617821
The final version of Main net is going to be set to handle 10k nodes

[Anonymous No.5618517]

>>5618304

I appreciate what you're saying but there are too many factors at play. I think if you consider the fact that Sergey said that the expects DLTs to move more money than the current internet, and if ChainLink is going to be the entrenched first mover for getting data on and off blockchains trustlessly, then even a pure functionality baseline is a shitload of money. $10B ($10 a token) seems super conservative in the medium term.

[Anonymous No.5618528]

>>5618422
So what will one coin in an IDEal World be Worth? Only Utility node value pls

[Anonymous No.5618599]

>>5618528
1000 dollars.

[Anonymous No.5618848]

>>5618494

where is this number from? i've never heard that.

>>5618517

yea, like I said sergey was just talking about bond interest payment data costing the member banks 10 to 20 million when there are obviously many other uses swift member banks alone would have for it. I agree that that much money could very well be moving via blockchain in the near future but how much of it will be captured by node operators is the question... especially when the whole point is to save money. $10 is completely reasonable given the market cap on many of the coins out there right now but how long can we count on this crypto bull market to continue? I'm optimistic because these things tend to play out over the course of years rather than months. But imagine if Sergey had held the ICO during the doldrums of just one or two years ago? A 10b market cap would have seemed outlandish. Maybe the cats out of the bag on these speculative values for crypto, idk and we'll never see valuations like before this summer again.

>>5618528

pajeets kindly fuck off

[Anonymous No.5618934]

>>5617882
>>5617681
no answer, just as expected

[Anonymous No.5619634]

People don’t understand, but LINK isn’t even the best part of the technology. LINK is just there to build the decentralized economy around the data providers. The real technology is the code behind smartcontract.com and the protocols Sergey and ari juels have built that allow decentralized data to interact with on chain smart contracts.

This really is biz’s big winner and I hope more bizbros take it very seriously. If they have the patience to wait 6 months, it could be very big.

[Anonymous No.5619847]

>>5617129
>Thats why so many link bagholders also got reqt by req and bought into shit like blackmoon and whatever that shitcoin that pulled an exitscam was, lmao

Litecoin? ;^)

[Anonymous No.5620139]

>>5618848
Rory said it in chat publically

[Anonymous No.5620173]

I'm all-in on LINK in hopes of making it, but is there any other coin with similar or higher potential of entering top 15 next year while giving at least a x20 return?

[Anonymous No.5620202]

>>5618848

[Anonymous No.5620383]

Can someone explain the math of why people think the tokens won't be worth much?

[Anonymous No.5620489]

Can someone explain the math of why people think the tokens won't be worth much? 10k nodes total getting 5-10 million and 350 million to 1 billion coins possible total circulation.

[Anonymous No.5620590]

How many links can a node hold?

[Anonymous No.5620788]

>>5617157
Have 2X'ed fag, what bags :^)

[Anonymous No.5621016]

>>5617746
>>t. 150k LINK holder
fuck, you've made it. $150 million

[Anonymous No.5621040]

let the fudder cry when we hit 3$ next year.

[Anonymous No.5621057]

/nubiz/ hates LINK because most of the circulating supply is locked away now.

There are only 2500 wallets with over 10k LINK.

Pajeets don't have enough disposable income to accumulate or beat the Binance bots.

35k here, cold storage only, pajeets not allowed. In at 15c

[Anonymous No.5621123]

>>5621040
we going way more than $3 for sure

[Anonymous No.5621338]

>>5616523
>huge majority of this board is completely braindead and will miss the biggest moon mission of our lifetimes
yes, I agree. Buy Vechain.

[Anonymous No.5621407]

>>5621016
Dat market cap of 1 trillion dollars kek

[Anonymous No.5621449]

>>5621057
Can you post the link to the top wallets?

[Anonymous No.5621525]

>>5621338
What is vechain?

[Anonymous No.5621610]

>>5621057
Damn, 35k? I've only got 50

[Anonymous No.5621653]

>>5621449

https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca#balances

[Anonymous No.5621687]

>>5618200
Mainnet is scheduled to support no more than 10k nodes

[Anonymous No.5621723]

>>5616523

Link is another shitcoin that will not be around by July

[Anonymous No.5621858]

>>5616523
lmao who gives a shit? Fuck them.

[Anonymous No.5621938]

How does LINK stack up with REQ though? Seems like REQ has a higher chance of mooning.

[Anonymous No.5621957]

>>5621938
Just hold both

[Anonymous No.5622011]

>>5621957
I do. But if one is much more likely to moon then that should obviously skew the portfolio %. REQ already has partnerships lined up, LINK has a rumor of Swift projects but nothing real.

[Anonymous No.5622407]

>>5621407
Market cap isn't quite valid as a stat for crypto

[Anonymous No.5622463]

I don't like chainlink because it has a shit logo. Seriously just look at it. It looks like something someone made in paint.

Aesthetics are an important part of any investment.

[Anonymous No.5622504]

>>5622463
the logo is one of the best things about LINK.

be gone, satan.

[Anonymous No.5622535]

>>5617479
Awwww babby's first $50k thats so cute

[Anonymous No.5622541]

>>5622463

The logo looks like the logo of a serious tool for an industry to employ, it works for what LINK is. It names the product and has a lock to represent security. Plus that hexagon

[Anonymous No.5622646]

12k Link here, am I gonna be a multi-millionaire?

[Anonymous No.5622808]

>>5622646
You will 100% break $1 Million easy

[Anonymous No.5622827]

10k nodes with 5 million coming in and 350 million coins is about $70 per coin. Is that a bad way to estimate valuation? Why diud someone say 4 cents per token is a good valuation?

[Anonymous No.5622863]

CHECK YOUR CHARTS

I THINK IT'S FINALLY HAPPENING!

PRICE BROKE OUT OF THE FLAG.

[Anonymous No.5622883]

It's actually disgusting watching everyone disregard Chainlink and chase empty pumps instead. This is the most innovative piece of technology that financial and insurance sectors have all been waiting for and it will actually revolutionize the world and strengthen every industry it touches.

Look at Vitalik, Roger, Justin, and Charlie constantly focusing on publicity stunts, shilling, and talking about the pricing of their coins. Sergey is actually the most reliable leader in the cryptosphere focusing only on his technology and development, no bullshitting with publicity stunts. Only honest answers to honest questions when he gets the chance.

I feel like I'm taking fucking crazy pills watching all of this play out. Etherscan shows that soon 95% of all available circulating LINK will be consolidated into less than 15,000 wallets and that continues to shrink as more people try to chase pumps, they're being shaken into stronger hands. As soon as Sergey's saved up LINK is finally handed over to institutions we'll see the price jump by increments of dollars and it'll be way too for most people by then. This is so fucking ridiculous and scary in showing how stupid most of /biz/ actually is.

[Anonymous No.5622891]

>>5622463
>>5622541
surely better than a fucking fidget spinner or some artsy-bartsy random shit

[Anonymous No.5622944]

>>5622883
Um that's old. Right now the top 100 wallets contain 87% of the available circulating link

[Anonymous No.5623064]

Another interesting thing to consider is that the circulating supply is going to be rather low if large scale adoption is achieved. Why sit on links rather than let a node operator stake them? This artificial scarcity is what will be the main cause of price singularity IMO.

Isn't LINK divisible to 18 digits?

[Anonymous No.5623072]

>>5622883
The top 500 wallets contain 93% of the total circulating link tokens

[Anonymous No.5623156]

>>5622808
Thank you anon. Thank you. I've had a unfulfilling life up until now. If I become a multi-millionaire, I'd literally cry tears of joy. Here's hoping. We're all gonna fucken make it bros. I don't care what anyone says.

[Anonymous No.5623174]

>>5623064
>Isn't LINK divisible to 18 digits?
Yep. LINK could be 1 trillion dollars each and you could still send someone 1 cent of link.

[Anonymous No.5623184]

>>5623156
we have your back, man.

[Anonymous No.5623213]

>>5621938
LINK is the solution for REQ lol, they announced that shit already

[Anonymous No.5623434]

>>5622944
>>5623072

kek, fucking moron

[Anonymous No.5623462]

top 100 wallets control 99% of the coins...

[Anonymous No.5623573]

If it break 3700 its going to 6k
Mark my words

[Anonymous No.5623611]

>>5623462

[Anonymous No.5623629]

>>5623462
SC owns 65% and there's like 20% on binance so... No shit?

[Anonymous No.5623647]

>>5621449
>>5622504
>>5623184

Guys, let's cut it out with these annoying Zelda memes already.

[Anonymous No.5623671]

>>5623647
go away dude im serious. i hate u. u arent allowed to hate on zelda memes with such zealotry

[Anonymous No.5623679]

>>5623647
You again

[Anonymous No.5623783]

>>5616523
WHO GIVES A FUCK. chainlink is an enterprise product it makes zero difference whether a bunch of autistic neckbeards on 4chan buy it or not. if anything biz is hurting the project by talking about it so much.

[Anonymous No.5623814]

top 10 wallets control 99.99% of the coins...

[Anonymous No.5624131]

>>5623814
top 1 wallet controls 99.999% of the coins..

[Anonymous No.5624167]

>>5624131
top 0.1 wallets control 99.9999% of coins....

[Anonymous No.5624190]

>>5624131
Sergey owns 999999999.9 coins!!!!! The other 13500 addresses own .1 link

[Anonymous No.5624474]

>>5616811
Not really. The true oldfag coins are DGB, ETH and BITB. Linkies are fucking newfags in my book

[Anonymous No.5624802]

How does the distribution of nodes to link affect the price of a link?

[Anonymous No.5624843]

How can we shill LINK more effectively and start building hype outside the /biz/ echo chamber?

[Anonymous No.5624936]

>>5624843
We don’t need to and we shouldn’t, just stay quiet and accumulate.

[Anonymous No.5625103]

>>5624936
Accumulate what? There are no tokens for sale. The top 100 addresses own 87% of available link and the top 500 addresses own 93% of available link. You couldn't even buy 50k link right now if you wanted to. There is nothing left to acvumulate.

[Anonymous No.5625176]

>>5625103
So now what? We wait for good news?

[Anonymous No.5625198]

>>5625103
>You couldn't even buy 50k link right now if you wanted to
what did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.5625274]

>>5625198
He meant to inform everyone that he has an IQ below room temperature

[Anonymous No.5625366]

>>5625198
It means I didn't check the order book and I was repeating what someone else said. Whoops

[Anonymous No.5625513]

>>5625198
Only 500k DNA coins left too yet no one talks about it. Tfw comfy.

[Anonymous No.5625534]

>mfw order books are static
so, I guess I can't send my linkies back to some exchange to cash out? It's all ture, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.5625862]

Read this if you want tyo understand how chasinlink can replace ripple.
https://medium.com/@rorypiant/the-chainlink-network-e4b38bd991aa

[Anonymous No.5626064]

Read this if you want to understand how chainlink can replace ripple.
https://medium.com/@rorypiant/the-chainlink-network-e4b38bd991aa

[Anonymous No.5626131]

>>5626064
Literally written by a dude in a basement.

[Anonymous No.5626143]

>>5626064
say again... I couldn't hear you.

[Anonymous No.5626510]

>>5624843

Shut up about it.

[Anonymous No.5627127]

>>5618089
Why is it more useful than any other coin? Why would companies give a fuck about decentralized oracles? What makes you think this will solve an actual problem in the next decade?

[Anonymous No.5627149]

Link to that thread?

[Anonymous No.5627179]

chainlink is number 108 on marketcap.

top kek, soon you'll be blessed when linkies enter the top 300

[Anonymous No.5627280]

Does anyone think eventually LINK tokens will be transferred to the Link Network from Ethereum?

[Anonymous No.5627365]

>>5620202
Why is everyone on the ChainLink team so fucking fat?
This ERC-20 is a soft exit scam. If you haven't realized that by now, you will always be poor.

[Anonymous No.5627518]

>>5627127
Link has zero competition right now. No one is providing oracles which smart contracts need to function. The only smart cointacts that can function currently are buy and sell orders between coins. many of the top 20 coins which are based on smart cobtacts can't do anything because they can't access information from outside of the blockchain. Link will change all of that and allow smart contracts to function in a secure decentralized manor. Etherium would be almost worth less if it can't actually work with real world systems and as of right now it can't. Decentralized Oracle's provide a way for data to enter or exit the blockchain in a secure manor involving the communication of many Oracle's. It's Toby far the safest way toi do it

[Anonymous No.5627559]

>>5627365
Then market sell your link. Why are you still holding faggot. Stop being a pussy and just market sell bitch.

[Anonymous No.5627793]

>>5627518
>no competitors
Except centralized oracles (a lot)

Most of the advertised data sources are private companies... What makes you think they will care about using a decentralized oracle?

[Anonymous No.5628046]

>>5627793
Yes centralized oracles which require by design anyone using them to be able to use the language it us written in and it restricts others ussing it to a single blockchain. If the 1 Oracle which contains the data is hacked then your data is no longer safe and can be altered. Link's Decentralized Oracle's have zero competition and go because they are decentralized they are trustless and would require someone trying to steal or aslter data to be able to hack multiple oracles. Decentralized Oracle's can by design operate with any programingv language and within the confines of any blockchain providing extra security and making it cheaper for institutions to use link instead of therir current obsolete system. Link is the future of smart contracts and oracles meanwhile no one is as close to making Oracle's in general a reality besides link.

[Anonymous No.5628114]

>>5627793
>>5628046
YEAH!

[Anonymous No.5628147]

>>5627793
Tldr: decentralized oracles are safer, more versatile, cheaper to implement, have more use cases, are better than centralized oracles and link is farther along than any centralized provider.

[Anonymous No.5628179]

>>5627793
>>5628147
YEAH!

[Anonymous No.5628290]

>>5616897

Can you imagine how much our lives will change, and for the better?

I keep a nice big stack and diversify into other investments for the sole purpose of consolidation into LINK over the next quarter. There isn’t much time left.

[Anonymous No.5628622]

someone post the link marine chart