CCIP hits mainnet

File: 82 KB, 983x1280, 48D494D9-0A35-46A8-80AA-5A51B8F99790.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

CCIP hits mainnet Anonymous Mon Sep 18 02:54:48 2023 No.56130738 [Reply] [Original]

Accumulation is done. Hope our fudding didn’t shake too many of you
https://ccip.chain.link/status

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:01:27 2023 No.56130777 Token not needed. Just another retarded crypto scam.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:03:08 2023 No.56130788 File: 1.00 MB, 2012x864, 1688668670551347.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56130738 >we can um... this allows us to... uhh... >JUST BUY IT, OK!?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:03:12 2023 No.56130789 >>56130738 Tokenomics not needed you retarded assholes

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:03:56 2023 No.56130794 >>56130789 >>56130788 >>56130777 Guys were done kek you didn’t get the message?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:09:18 2023 No.56130815 >>56130794 Fuck off no one’s buying your fucking scam piece of shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:09:31 2023 No.56130817 >>56130738 Things keep happened too quickly. I can’t keep up.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:10:16 2023 No.56130821 >>56130794 who cares, let them keep up the 24/7 fud spam it amounts to absolutely nothing compared to the coming institutional adoption and it would only trick twitter and reddit tourists who came here to buy ape nfts with their beer money anyway

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:11:43 2023 No.56130825 File: 1.28 MB, 1125x1722, B95246AE-742C-4AC3-9287-8658A0BEAFB5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] .

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:11:44 2023 No.56130826 >>56130794 Base and bnb still in testnet you fucking liar >>56130821 Do you think you’re so clever with your schemes?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:12:38 2023 No.56130828 >>56130777 FPBP AND CHECKED

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:15:41 2023 No.56130847 >>56130826 oh yeah sorry i forgot you're the one with the clever schemes here - being le epic gatekeeping fudder with his tiny 1k stack and all lmao keep up the good work lil fella

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:16:58 2023 No.56130853 >>56130794 a lot of them are likely ones who were legitimately fooled

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:18:34 2023 No.56130860 >>56130847 Suicide stack is 10k and make it is 100k, dipshit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:22:00 2023 No.56130877 >>56130860 i didnt say 1k was a suicide stack, retard

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:30:41 2023 No.56130923 File: 19 KB, 306x306, 507.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >CCIP mainnet >$6.37

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:35:52 2023 No.56130947 >>56130923 nah we pumping

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:36:25 2023 No.56130951 >>56130923 Up to $6.50 now. At this rate we'll be at $20 by Wednesday

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 03:38:23 2023 No.56130956 interesting timing but probably a coincidence anyway a nice string of good bits of news

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 04:22:30 2023 No.56131171 >>56130738 wen pepechain listed? ;)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 04:29:34 2023 No.56131218 File: 60 KB, 427x400, 1695011371056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56130788 >bro you dont get it... We get to send our dogenigger69inu420 from eth to polygon. >this is HUUUUUUUGE its what everyones been waiting for!!!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 07:56:55 2023 No.56131906 File: 3.42 MB, 380x380, 1695008530162290.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56131218 OOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 08:16:06 2023 No.56131946 SWIFT is going live on mainnet in five hours. Screenshot this post, or just check back later. Kek fuddies

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 08:18:03 2023 No.56131953

>bridges
>2023

why are they following a 2021 era playbook?
bridges and multi-chain already failed, it only ever existed so people could pump and dump avax/sol/atom.

nobody was ever actually going to use any blockchains other than bitcoin or ethereum.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 09:05:35 2023 No.56132067 >>56131946 No way Swift goes live that soon after the experiments concluded

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 09:11:52 2023 No.56132092 >>56131953 >thinking banks will use BTC or ETH instead of their own private blockchains lmao

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 09:22:26 2023 No.56132142

>>56132092
they're not using any of it, they're only interested in using what retail wants, and retail wants access to bitcoin and ethereum.
they will never adopt shitcoin infrastructure when they hold all the keys to the kingdom. they'll make products for btc/eth, and skim the top.

you still haven't realized? look at what they're doing, not what they're saying.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 09:46:09 2023 No.56132214 >>56130738 Rory here, yeah we're currently exploring a beta proof of concept pilot on testnet v0.01 and depending the results from the audits and our next white paper we might upgrade to the mainnet in 2 more weeks so uh hold the line marines

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 09:51:16 2023 No.56132235
File: 128 KB, 512x512, 1695030664913.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>56130738
You just have to say
>super-linear staking
You'll get either literally shaking baggies larping as smug non-spoonfeeder or silence altogether. Every. Fucking. Time. Check the archives if you don't believe me
>TL;DR: Nobody can refute that super-linear staking breaks indeed the token growth

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:03:36 2023 No.56132279

>>56132235
>Ari: "We have quadratically improved the security of the network."
>Fudcucks: "This is.... le BAD!"
Hello retard. The more secure the network is the more valuable it is. Btw, token price is determined by supply/demand dynamics, not directly by super-linear staking.
In other words what it means is that regardless if the Link price is high or low, the network is more secure than if they hadn't implemented SLS. SLS improves demand for the network because it makes the network more valuable due to its high security.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:58:01 2023 No.56132586 File: 544 KB, 777x777, 1656849164307.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] fuddies on suicide watch we are so BACK

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 11:00:06 2023 No.56132598 >>56132586 They're going to time the BTC dump to coincide with Sergey's opening SIBOS speech.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 11:01:52 2023 No.56132606 File: 866 KB, 777x777, 1661681366848.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56132598

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 11:02:04 2023 No.56132609 >>56132067 It's a limited beta test, don't get your knickers in a knot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 11:04:23 2023 No.56132620 this is about to go sub $5 smart guy on twit revealed some things, carry on you won't believe me which is why Im telling you. faces will melt

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 12:03:20 2023 No.56132964
File: 3.27 MB, 512x512, 1695038582408.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>56132279
>The more secure the network is the more valuable it is
For the company, not retail, not the token
>token price is determined by supply/demand dynamics
Super-linear staking literally reduces demand exponentially since nodes can secure the network with spare change
>regardless if the Link price is high or low, the network is more secure than if they hadn't implemented SLS
True, but what's the catalyst for the token price appreciation is again? It's not the network more secure so more valuable because that is a valid point only for Chainlink as a company, it's not driven by demand since super-linear staking reduces it drastically, you tell me
>SLS improves demand for the network because it makes the network more valuable due to its high security
No need to repeat yourself if you have nothing left to add

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 12:06:40 2023 No.56132983 >>56132964 You sure have a lot to say about other people's bags.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 12:13:26 2023 No.56133023 >>56132067 They have been working with Sergey since 2014. Pay attention.

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 12:14:58 2023 No.56133030
File: 191 KB, 1080x1688, 1695039280245.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>56132983
It would come to you as a surprise but I hold 10K+ links, ~$100K, and I hold even more btc and eth. So no matter what link does I will make it in the next golden bullrun, that's why even if I'm interested in the token I can fuck around and call out your bullshit with a light heart. You get it now anon? Btw still not an argument

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 12:15:20 2023 No.56133032 >>56132983 Linkfags are beyond pathetic, I don’t even know what to call the vibe you’re giving off these days. It’s something like schizophrenic.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 12:30:50 2023 No.56133120 >>56133030 >>56133032 >getting this angry at your own bags Just when you thought you'd seen everything

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 14:21:32 2023 No.56133958 >>56133030 You sound like a fucking low IQ future suicide case that wants everyone to feel as miserable as they do 24/7. Save us all the trouble and slit your wrists now.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 18:13:47 2023 No.56135829 File: 59 KB, 410x524, 1695060818130.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Link fags we are all gonna make it........MAKE IT TO THE MENTAL ASYLUM

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 18:59:02 2023 No.56136182 >>56135829 good 1, fudfren

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 19:03:08 2023 No.56136221 Nice. After arbitrum, then staking, then offchain computation, then VRF, then ladyluck, then CCIP all we have to wait for next is regulation and we brave few, we marines will make it in 2030.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 19:03:42 2023 No.56136226 >>56132092 private blockchains interacting with others - its going to need two things; 1) an Avax subnet, and 2) CCIP

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 19:42:51 2023 No.56136524 File: 291 KB, 1447x1437, 1652911486397.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56130738 >bro we work with banks! >bro we are gunna hit $1000 EOY! wow sounds a lot like an XRP bagholding thread

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 19:56:08 2023 No.56136654 >>56130738 What's new here? Am I missing something? This mainnet existed already

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:02:52 2023 No.56136709

>>56132067
SWIFT had thing basically saying
>we research diligently, test rigorously, and roll out quickly
So who knows, it could be faster than we think. No doubt we are in the endgame now though. I can only imagine how much they were actually doing during our years of speculation and radio silence.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:09:23 2023 No.56136778 >>56136654 No a couple of those chains were testnet only. I think it was Eth and Ava were live, and OP, Arb, and Poly were just test. BNB and Base are new.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:19:28 2023 No.56136866 File: 139 KB, 929x684, heathenStreetShitter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56136778 This is correct.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:31:55 2023 No.56136947 >>56136709 listen to dobson himself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8IqyEzeXTc they can go to some early use cases like carbon credits quickly, it's not like they have to do everything at once for zoomers who can't listen to 3 mins, just go to 2:20

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:40:15 2023 No.56136998 >>56136866 >never smoked or drink >still balding JUST

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:41:48 2023 No.56137007 >>56136998 Don’t be an asshole. He’s a good guy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:45:41 2023 No.56137033 >>56136998 There's too many of them to eat meat and have healthy diets so they're psyoped into being "vegetarians". Now the WEF is trying to do the same thing to us. Your children will be bald and sickly just like him.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:55:28 2023 No.56137117 >>56137033 checked and truth pilled

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:56:30 2023 No.56137125 >>56130738 "Wow, incredible news about Chainlink! Their relentless dedication and innovation continue to pay off, bringing us closer to a decentralized future. Exciting times ahead for hodlers like us! #CryptoProgress #HODLStrong"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 22:06:57 2023 No.56137590 >>56130777 Which crypto narrative do you think is worth it anon?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 22:08:54 2023 No.56137597 >>56130738 The token simply isn't needed. It's just a 2017 ICO shitcoin zombie project looking for solutions to problems that don't exist.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 22:10:43 2023 No.56137612 Why is CCIP not mentioned in the Whitepaper?

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 22:24:32 2023 No.56137690

>>56132964
SLS only applies to situations where nodes collude, this fud was debunked on snow white day of thunder, it only gets recycled now as a tranny shit test/purity test. And yes I also hold 10k+ link, I just think the losers who won’t be satisfied until reddit can’t afford a triple digit stack are pathetic.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 22:35:38 2023 No.56137767 >>56137597 yeah, you're right. (you) should probably never buy and also filter out any link threads so you don't have to spend your time in said link threads. I'm positive you have better things to do, don't (you)?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:00:13 2023 No.56137922 >>56130738 Too late nerd. You spent too many years fudding too hard. Now no one will ever buy.

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:06:56 2023 No.56137970
File: 3.19 MB, 3024x4032, 1695078098628.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>56137922
I hold link and Im not done fudding. Seethe.
Im crashing this plane with no survivors. Honestly I dislike every link holder, over the years they turned into such horrible people and absolute monsters that I would be more than happy to take the L and have none of us make it.
I built a solid business which I enjoy doing so its not a big deal to me.
So these toxic piece of garbage neets can burn and stay poor

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:16:47 2023 No.56138033 >>56130738 Why do you have to spam this all day?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:23:36 2023 No.56138082 >>56137922 this linkies ruined it it's ogre

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:26:12 2023 No.56138097 >>56137970 This pic lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 00:57:33 2023 No.56138651 >>56130825 (You)

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 01:00:22 2023 No.56138665 >>56130825 Thomas making me laugh, I have now seen it all.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 01:03:02 2023 No.56138678 >>56131946 I missed this but yeah think this was a swing and a miss

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 01:53:41 2023 No.56139000

This is just like after mainnet launch in 2019 when data feeds started with Eth then slowly and exponentially grew. Except this time it is freaking mainnet bridges connecting to each other. ohhh the value capture on this will be massive
>>56136866
no wonder he looks anemic and sickly
>>56137007
hi palatine

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:01:03 2023 No.56139043 >>56139000 I’m a white guy in Massachusetts

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:27:19 2023 No.56139163 >>56139000 Checked

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 04:26:00 2023 No.56139683 >>56139043 stinkies always live in taxachusetts xD

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 04:31:40 2023 No.56139701 >>56139043 I don't care

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:17:11 2023 No.56139856

>>56137970
>im um... im a successful business owner but uh... i hate linkies so thats why i painstakingly research sissy porn coomer stuff to use in memes because apparently this will do something or make people sell
uh huh
that's DEFINITELY why you probably have gbs of sissy porn shit and cock cages on your pc
i believe you, successful business anon

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:23:57 2023 No.56139879 >>56139856 Uh oh... chainlinkgod discord just woke up and they are RILED up

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:27:32 2023 No.56139898 >>56132964 Can anyone PLEASE DEBUNK THIS?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:28:15 2023 No.56139900 >>56139898 undebunkable

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:33:42 2023 No.56139924 >>56139900 Can’t argue with these double dubs. Guess it’s true, chainlink as a company does go up in value but the token doesn’t Do you think we can really go to $1000 end of year?

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:02:51 2023 No.56140039
File: 10 KB, 259x195, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>56130738
Question about CCIP:
Does the Chainlink Labs team have to manually implement each CCIP lane for each blockchain? Looking at their CCIP lane status page, looks like each blockchain is only really connected to Ethereum (for the most part). If each chain has to be manually connected to each other chain then adding just 1 blockchain seems to increase the difficulty exponentially. Pic related is a visualisation of the issue.
It's not an issue now, but the issue comes when CLL claims that "each bank will have it's own blockchain. There will be hundreds of blockchains connected by CCIP". Is CLL going to have to manually connect each of these hundreds of blockchains? Doesn't seem like a sustainable solution to me...

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:05:35 2023 No.56140053 >>56139856 kekked and rekt

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:14:38 2023 No.56140084 >>56140039 Thanks just sold stack

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:18:25 2023 No.56140095 >>56140039 Listen to the latest SIBOS talk where he talks about "500 people"

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:20:14 2023 No.56140101 I'm not impressed

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:20:28 2023 No.56140102

>>56140084
Well you're obviously being satirical but I wasn't trying to fud the project. CCIP is obviously the chosen solution going forward, I'm just wondering how it's supposed to work.
It's pretty impossible for 1 single development team to manually connect hundreds of blockchains to hundreds of other blockchains.
I thought CCIP being an open-sourced standard meant that it'd be kinda like a self-serve solution, like the CCIP solution is already there and then each blockchain's development team is the one responsible for integrating CCIP. But it seems like they have to wait for CLL to do it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:28:03 2023 No.56140122 >>56140039 Not every chain needs to be connected to every other chain and on the other hand, the bridges only need to be set up once.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:31:29 2023 No.56140130

>>56140102
>But it seems like they have to wait for CLL to do it.
Honestly, Chainlink will probably open source the APIs eventually to let other teams do the work for them. If they're smart anyway, they'll do that after they've established the protocol and cornered the crosschain market.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:33:56 2023 No.56140138 >>56130738 Optimistic on Optimism. X100 this bullrun. Easily. Coinbase coin is based on Optimism. It will moonrocket

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:34:15 2023 No.56140140 >>56140102 No it will have one central chain that all of the others hook up to Think of how banking works today. Banks transfer money through each other with centralized clearing houses In ccip world, these clearing houses will be decentralized

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 07:56:26 2023 No.56140436 >>56130738 What does this mean? The price of a single LINK token is more or less the same as before??

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 08:01:45 2023 No.56140460 >>56130738 just in time for the ethgate, eth is gonna get a big hit. Thinking about swapping my eth for btc...

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 08:02:01 2023 No.56140461 >>56137612 Whitepapers are a 2017 narrative same as "partnerships"

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 08:13:26 2023 No.56140488 >>56130821 MUH INSTITOOOOSHINSS IM GONA INSTITOOOOOOOOOOOOT

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:03:53 2023 No.56140648 >>56140488 wait until they find out that institutions got where they are by extracting rent, not paying it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:35:55 2023 No.56140752 >>56130794 >message You need to run CCIP to get messages.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:38:15 2023 No.56140762 >>56140648 >institutions >not paying rent lol They outsource as much as humanly possible, especially when it’s tech related.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:41:45 2023 No.56140781 >>56140488 You are a tranny and a nigger. You are a trannigger.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 10:21:04 2023 No.56140928

>>56140762
this isn't tech, this is just trying to replicate legacy rails a different way. they don't need it nor do they care about it. they're not interested in offering shitcoin services, only rent seeking on btc/eth etfs. bridges and services to failed chains are simply not needed.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 10:29:00 2023 No.56140968 >>56140460 What's the ethgate about? China buying the ico?

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 10:55:58 2023 No.56141053

>>56140928
>this is just trying to replicate legacy rails a different way.
Imagine describing the step from single-entry book keeping to double-entry book keeping like this, or the step from physical ledgers to digital ledgers. Mind boggling how so many people seem to have blinders on when it comes to recognizing potential disrupting use cases for tech, even when the proof is right in front of them.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 10:57:52 2023 No.56141063 >>56140928 I’ve seen this mentioned a few times since yesterday. Is this the new tranny narrative?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 11:00:16 2023 No.56141069 >>56141053 He's being deliberately obtuse to farm attention and (you)s, retard. He's just playing a game of "who can I stimulate to react to me".

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 11:01:12 2023 No.56141073 Fuddies are fucked, were coming for you!

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 11:02:09 2023 No.56141077 >>56130738 I still have no use for the token

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 11:02:37 2023 No.56141082

>>56140968
nah ripple got pretty much fucked because of the sec and the conspiracies are that Ethereum was or is favoured by the sec and big institutions. It would make the decentralized argument of Ethereum a lot weaker, thats why I dont like the risk and thinking about swapping it for btc. Dont want to take unnecessary risk if there are other options.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 12:14:12 2023 No.56141332

>>56141053
if you're trying to sell a concept you've already failed, they can do it themselves, and they will.

>>56141063
you mean the thing xrp has tried and failed to do for over 10 years? the same scams keep appearing and the same retards keep falling for them.

institutions have never adopted a public crypto technology that isn't already in widespread use by retail directly.

there's no b2b pathway for these alt companies, they're permanently stuck on the outside and a secret laughing stock of those in control.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 12:18:00 2023 No.56141349

>>56141332
>if you're trying to sell a concept you've already failed, they can do it themselves, and they will.
Remember when every company had their own servers? Remember when companies had in house HR? Of course you don't, because you either never held a white collar job or are a zoomzoom who can't fathom how things used to be different.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 12:19:32 2023 No.56141356 why is the price still down 90%? wtf

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 12:24:52 2023 No.56141371 >>56141332 Imagine comparing XRP to Link. Most banks have some kind of in-house chain, many banks even have more than one. They aren't going to all suddenly agree to use one single chain, that's complete nonsense.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 12:25:13 2023 No.56141374 >>56141063 Yeah, its called reality

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 12:27:33 2023 No.56141380 File: 925 KB, 1172x1231, 1682146519002689.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56140928 >banks don't need or care about tokenisation Except tokenisation is THE number 1 focus in finance right now. Pic was just yesterday.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:19:21 2023 No.56141631 >>56141380 yeah, how they're going to SELL you things on their own they're never going to BUY any of your dogshit, it simply isn't necessary when you own all the existing rails

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:21:27 2023 No.56141642 File: 321 KB, 945x664, 1686704507926268.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56141631 >they're never going to BUY any of your dogshit

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:21:53 2023 No.56141645 >>56141631 you're right that banks aren't going to be buying btc, eth, xrp, or any of that shit. they have their own private chains instead but how will those private chains communicate with each other? hmmmmm

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:25:17 2023 No.56141667 >>56141631 >when you own all the existing rails Chainlink connects those rails. Banks don’t have to think about anything except paying a nominal fee just like they do with APIs and cloud.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:31:13 2023 No.56141717 >>56141642 they arnt going to buy it. Just tokenise the scams they have going through CCIP

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:32:36 2023 No.56141731 >>56141717 If they're going through CCIP they're paying fees. And if they're paying fees, they're buying Link even if they don't know about it. Get it through your id-hopping skull: we were right all along.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:37:59 2023 No.56141775 >>56141731 dumb ass, im saying the same thing. banks wont buy shiba dong bank, but they will tokinise carbon credit bs. They have to use CCIP

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:39:55 2023 No.56141790 >>56141775 You said the exact same words as a fuddie who said banks were never going to buy Link.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 13:47:02 2023 No.56141838 >>56141790 ok

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 14:17:55 2023 No.56142056 >>56131953 These multichains were captive of a mainchain, CCIP is actually truly crosschain.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 17:14:36 2023 No.56143467 File: 1.44 MB, 449x498, 1637492847427.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56133030 >prices listed in rupees you can't make this shit up

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 17:44:33 2023 No.56143724 >>56142056 unneccessary in a world where bitcoin has already won and ethereum and its l2 narrative has picked up every other available avenue cross-chain is cope from those who bought obsolete bags.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 17:46:06 2023 No.56143736

>>56141645
private chains can communicate with their private bridges, because being private means not allowing any public access and using no public networks like chainlink or its derivatives.

you guys really haven't stopped to think about what a private network even is.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 17:48:39 2023 No.56143771 >>56143736 You actually think they'll manually integrate and bridge 1000s of private bank chains? Kek fuddies

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 17:57:30 2023 No.56143848

>>56143771
why would they need to when banks already have agreements with swift who do it for them already?
private networks will never be legally allowed to bridge onto public networks or public nodes.

you guys are retarded if you think networks made private for security and regulatory concerns are going to magically open themselves up to manipulation by a public blockchain from an unvetted, untrusted, and unrespected entity.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 18:05:19 2023 No.56143906 >>56143848 CCIP doesn't open them up to manipulation that's the whole point

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 18:54:13 2023 No.56144267 >>56143848 Tell me you were dropped on your head as a baby over and over, without telling me you were dropped on your head.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 19:17:36 2023 No.56144438

>>56130738
anyone that got fudded after ccip launch deserved it honestly
and everyone that got fudded before could have bought back in for 6 dollarinos so nothing lost

>>56141349
companies beyond small scale ever giving up control over their own servers was a giant fucking mistake tho and HR should be 98% outsourced to software

>>	Keith !!i1x0V2JuFg/ Tue Sep 19 20:02:24 2023 No.56144797 >>56131218 Kek

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 20:09:50 2023 No.56144844 >>56130738 >Accumulation is done. I just accumulated

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 20:44:05 2023 No.56145116 ethgate???

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:01:46 2023 No.56145239

>>56143906
it exposes them to a public network which is what they don't want or legally can't even use.
this isn't a dumb pipe, chainlink gets insight into the network via liquidity/pair swaps and that's a big no no.

their product is DOA for private networks.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:06:24 2023 No.56145263 >>56145239 funny how swift disagrees but ok

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:12:19 2023 No.56145305

>>56145263
xrp people said the same thing in 2017, nothing ever materializes. they're scoping these technologies out, that's all.
if you can't see it you haven't been around the circus long enough. if your validation relies heavily on swift's perceived interest you're in for a bad time.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:20:16 2023 No.56145366

>>56145305
>xrp people said the same thing in 2017, nothing ever materializes
They are still in the process, and I feel it will be given the level of interest by many institutions using it as a settlement. Buying via tap Fintech atm. Holding for the long term.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:23:11 2023 No.56145394 >>56145263 How does this support token valuation in the first place? I don't seem to understand why many count on this as a major narrative for further price action when it has nothing to do with the token.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:27:45 2023 No.56145425 >>56145305 yeah but unlike xrp, chainlink has a working product

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:42:40 2023 No.56145522 File: 122 KB, 1146x606, 1685108271669471.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56145239 >CCIP >DOA for private networks you're a retard

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:43:46 2023 No.56145527 File: 51 KB, 956x329, 1684438164132816.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56145394 >CCIP >nothing to do with the token you're a retard

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:46:12 2023 No.56145547 >>56145522 >experiments i'll refer you once again to the much more overt "partnerships" xrp had, and that was for a private e2e chain that had no regulatory issues.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:52:26 2023 No.56145586 >>56145547 There go the goalposts kek >xrp Banks were never going to use one chain

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:53:36 2023 No.56145590 >>56145586 >goalposts rich coming from a link baggie who completely left the field by 2020.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 22:00:36 2023 No.56145636 >>56145590 >completely left the field At least you’re still here lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 22:40:29 2023 No.56145911 >>56145527 Let's just come out open for those newbie to understand the essence of the partnership. If it has, then state it, Schizo.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 23:26:18 2023 No.56146280 >>56145527 >dumb idiot has nothing to do with link token other than equating whatever token is used to lilnk's value. link token not needed, you clearly don't understand though. Please keep buying link tokens dummy.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 00:50:10 2023 No.56146821 >>56133030 >I will make it in the next golden bullrun thats what you said last bullrun tho...

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 01:51:53 2023 No.56147300 >>56146821 >thats what you said last bullrun tho Nope, last bullrun I went from 10K to 400K kek

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 06:32:02 2023 No.56148731 >>56145547 >>56145911 >>56146280 absolute turbo overcope

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance