Why would I buy it if Sergey gives it for free to institutions and sells it when he needs money? Sounds like a scam, where biz chuds are the only ones paying for the token

File: 856 B, 319x158, images (6).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 06:54:16 2023 No.56075329 [Reply] [Original]

Why would I buy it if Sergey gives it for free to institutions and sells it when he needs money? Sounds like a scam, where biz chuds are the only ones paying for the token

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 06:57:57 2023 No.56075337 File: 49 KB, 656x678, 1687724334117098.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >biz chuds are the only ones paying for the token So you admit the token is needed? Looks like you lose commie

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 07:15:52 2023 No.56075381 >>56075337 What do you mean "admit"? I'm just pondering buying it but the fact that only retail buys it looks scammy

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 07:19:38 2023 No.56075393 >>56075329 Duuude in 10 years there won't be any uncirculating supply anymore and banks will have to buy it. You're just lucky to be able to buy it now

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 07:35:42 2023 No.56075429 >>56075329 >What is speculation? retard

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 07:49:16 2023 No.56075465

>>56075329
Like 99% of cryptos do the exact same thing, but of course it's only a problem for Chainlink.

98% of miner rewards are coins given to them "for free" by Satoshi.
Miners are paying a lot in hardware and electricity, but none of that flows back to Bitcoin holders.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 08:03:48 2023 No.56075502 >>56075465 Ah ok sorry I missed the news about microstrategy, JPMorgan, sovereign states etc.. publicly buying link, can you point me to these articles?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 08:04:55 2023 No.56075506 File: 60 KB, 725x480, 1694384218001002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56075329 >hehehehe, they will buy it eventually, you wouldn't understand

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 08:07:14 2023 No.56075509 >>56075502 That has nothing to do with what I said lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 08:12:18 2023 No.56075525 >>56075509 You compare it to bitcoin. Bitcoin has institutions buying it. Comparing subsidies would make sense if you had this level of investment in the token

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 08:14:36 2023 No.56075532 >>56075393 this is bullshit but i believe it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 08:16:25 2023 No.56075537 >>56075506 >(((x))) What the FUCK did he mean by this

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 08:16:28 2023 No.56075538 File: 24 KB, 803x196, 1678892331547986.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56075525 Lots of cryptos have institutions buying them.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 10:52:07 2023 No.56076062 >>56075525 Advocate bros, our response?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 10:57:33 2023 No.56076088 >>56075537 (((You))) know EXACTLY what he meant by this

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 11:36:54 2023 No.56076265 >>56075465 How is this argument explain the chart?

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 11:46:14 2023 No.56076306

>>56075329
Three options basically:
1. You believe Sergey stops giving tokens for free (or OTC deals)
2. You believe the token has value after Sergey has ran out of reserves and the team won't expand the supply.
3. You believe the speculative demand will be enough to offset Sergey selling

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 11:47:10 2023 No.56076312 >>56076265 I was explaining what OP said, not the chart. But it is relevant to the chart as well; a pervasive double standard against a specific coin will hurt its hype and thus its speculative power.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 12:04:59 2023 No.56076393 >>56076306 Grim

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 12:09:58 2023 No.56076409 >>56075465 Yes because everything except BTC is a useless shitcoin making money for the owners. lmao.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 12:21:35 2023 No.56076465 >>56076409 Bitcoin has two nodes that control more than 51% of mining power, and even to this day 98% of its mining is subsidized. And that's without mentioning the slow transactions. How is Bitcoin not a fucking shitcoin lmao

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 12:35:25 2023 No.56076538 >>56075502 >>56075525 Bitcoin went through 3 bull runs before institutions started buying it. BTC inflation was even higher back then too. Why is it so hard for fuddies to admit that any crypto distribution model will involve dilution?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 12:50:21 2023 No.56076625 >>56075329 Real answer: It's just speculation at that point, holders hope that Sergey will force users to actually buy link on binance or coinbase at some point.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:24:20 2023 No.56077793

>>56076306

>1. You believe Sergey stops giving tokens for free (or OTC deals)

he won't

>2. You believe the token has value after Sergey has ran out of reserves and the team won't expand the supply.

it doesn't

>3. You believe the speculative demand will be enough to offset Sergey selling

there isn't

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:27:51 2023 No.56077838 >>56076306 >>56077793 There's literally only one option when it comes to Chainlink pumping: >1. Bitcoin stops dumping on all Link news and pumps

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:31:11 2023 No.56077872

>>56077838
yeah or how about
>1.people show up and buy the damn thing regardless of BTC dumps
>2.instantly the token gets strength and momentum
>3. it pumps sky high as soon as BTC stops shitting itself
you know, like it used to be 4 years ago
face it, nobody fucking buys it, hence zero strength against the market

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:32:27 2023 No.56077885 >>56077872 >>1.people show up and buy the damn thing regardless of BTC dumps You're retarded.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:32:52 2023 No.56077887 >>56075465 >Like 99% of cryptos do the exact same thing, but of course it's only a problem for Chainlink. wait so chainlink is like 99$ of the other shitcoins then?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:33:42 2023 No.56077890 >>56077887 When it comes to things like tokenomics, yes.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:33:54 2023 No.56077892 >give free link to institutions >promote this to link baggies as a "groundbreaking partnership" >baggies fall for the bait again >dump stinky bags on baggies it's win-win (not for baggies though)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:35:40 2023 No.56077904 >>56077890 then don't be surprised when it behaves just like the other 99%, you retarded avocado nice retort btw >you're a retard kys

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:36:39 2023 No.56077909 >>56075393 Why can't the Fatman hard fork and double supply for (((inflationary reasons)))?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:47:58 2023 No.56078009 >>56077904 But it doesn't? Other cryptos tend to pump on good news.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:48:30 2023 No.56078015

>>56077904
>it behaves just like the other 99%
It behaves like none of them.
Literally any other coin would instantly boost 10x if they only got one speaking slot at Sibos for instance.

>>56077892
Which is why Swift is also working with Vechain, Tron, etc. right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:50:27 2023 No.56078028 >>56078009 hey keep your story straight bro, LINK does pump on good news too, it's the Bitcorn which suppresses every pump, remember? >>56078015 I'll give you my most dignified response you're retarded

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:52:04 2023 No.56078041 File: 392 KB, 1970x1970, 1672456611066760.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56078028 >LINK does pump on good news too, it's the Bitcorn which suppresses every pump, remember? Exactly right.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:54:24 2023 No.56078065 >>56078028 >LINK does pump on good news too, it's the Bitcorn which suppresses every pump, remember? So in the end it doesn't pump? I fail the see the inconsistency here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:56:04 2023 No.56078077 >>56078041 don't talk to me, retard >>56078065 but it's up x50 from the ICO? by your definition, nothing ever pumps!

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:58:34 2023 No.56078097

>>56078077
>but it's up x50 from the ICO?
It is. What does that have to do with Chainlink being unpumpable for the past 2 years?

>by your definition, nothing ever pumps!
You're not smart enough to catch logical inconsistencies anon. Drop the act, it's embarrassing.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 15:58:50 2023 No.56078100 >>56077904 >then don't be surprised when it behaves just like the other 99% If Link had done that these past three years, it would be top 3 right now.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:07:13 2023 No.56078167

>>56078097
I'd say that 99% of "the other shitcoins" have equaled that and actually done much worse, some of them remain unpumpable for more than 4 years! you can check them out anon
if you think about it, LINK isn't doing all that bad on the grand scheme of things, it's literally average, which at this point, makes it indistinguishable from the other 99%!
>>56078100
I'm sorry, there can only be 3 on the top 3
kek

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:16:57 2023 No.56078250

>>56078167
Normal behavior for 99% of shitcoins is to pump on news.
Just to guve an example: uniswap has a tiny fraction of the Defi dominance of Chainlink and virtually zero institutional interest, AND it’s a governance token so quite literally useless.
But it’s neck and neck with Link on Coinmarketcap.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:19:29 2023 No.56078281 >>56078250 normal behavior for 99% is to slowly die on a long enough timeframe, none of them last, each cycle they endure keeps getting weaker for them, and they keep getting flatlined I literally have no clue about which shitcoins you speak of

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:19:33 2023 No.56078283 >>56078167 Literally gibberish. Ever took an IQ test?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:20:21 2023 No.56078290 >>56078283 kek, you might be genuinely retarded anon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:20:52 2023 No.56078295 >>56078281 >I literally have no clue about which shitcoins you speak of Uniswap was literally mentioned.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:21:15 2023 No.56078299 >>56078295 yeah what about it? it hasn't had a proper pump since 2 years ago

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:22:43 2023 No.56078308 >>56078250 >it’s neck and neck with Link on Coinmarketcap what are you talking about? it's 5 spots below LINK as we speak

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:22:44 2023 No.56078309
File: 7 KB, 282x179, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

What would be the best APY platforms? Right now im on VirtualYields and i have been getting ~2% daily and they also have instant withdrawals, so there is no need to wait for approvals.

I want to try a similar service, do you know?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:23:00 2023 No.56078310 >>56078299 It’s neck and neck with Chainlink despite having only a fraction of the utility and institutional interest.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:23:21 2023 No.56078312 >>56078310 ???>>56078308

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:24:27 2023 No.56078321 >>56078312 Check coingecko, it’s more accurate

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:25:48 2023 No.56078329 File: 26 KB, 867x503, huh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56078321 you said cmc yourself but whatever, cool, muh market cap hooray what about the chart? it's dead

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:27:52 2023 No.56078340 >>56078329 >what about the chart? it's dead Because Link doesn’t (isn’t allowed to) react to news like 99% of crypto.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:28:23 2023 No.56078343 >>56078340 are you retarded? that's the Uni chart holy fucking shit, are you people actual bots?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:30:09 2023 No.56078367 >>56078343 Ok, Uni’s chart makes sense considering its lack of news. Chainlink having the same pattern is completely retarded.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:30:22 2023 No.56078372

Our best hope to pump the price is to convince the next generation of crypto buyers that it’s going to moon soon. Very likely Sergey and co want another speculative pump round so they have even more runway. We can all see the dream is not even close to being here, it’s 10-15 years out.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:31:17 2023 No.56078380

>>56078329
What about XLM? It has similar uncirculating supply as LINK, similar token emission rates, similar rank on CMC/Coingecko. Yet it pumped almost 80% since June on virtually no news. What gives?

Seems like XLM is everything fuddies accuse LINK of being (old 2017 shitcoin, unneeded token etc) yet it is still pumping while LINK is not. Very weird.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:34:26 2023 No.56078412
File: 25 KB, 870x492, whatthefuckamireading.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>56078367
...anon, literally 99% of the market looks like this, news or not
if you're talking about shit like LTC pumping 20% on a fake Wallmart partnership, don't forget that it literally dumped right back down again, as it usually happens on "crypto news"
by mistaking the Uni chart with LINK's you accidentally proved my point
it's just like all the other shitcoins at this point
>>56078380
???
XLM is also completely dead, just like the rest of them? it is actually trading at its 2018 lows as we speak holy kek
keep proving me right boys

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:36:31 2023 No.56078431
File: 721 KB, 1044x984, 1694450070734.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>56075329
Hoping to get rich buying ChainLink from Sergay is like trying to get rich off McDonald's by buying big mac's. If you want to make money from the project either get hired there or attempt to buy a stake in the company (this is a terrible idea though since fundamentally the company is not needed)

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:36:54 2023 No.56078435

>>56078412
>XLM is also completely dead, just like the rest of them? it is actually trading at its 2018 lows as we speak holy kek
At least try to not be disengeious anon. Every linear chart looks the same of it had an enormous peek at some point. Compare XLM's 1Y chart to Chainlink's 1Y chart and read my post again.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:37:27 2023 No.56078442 >>56078412 >99% of the market looks like this, news or not That’s the point: Chainlink looking like 99% of the market despite the insane news is retarded. Any other coin would pump to high heaven on the slightest hint of Swift news.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:37:56 2023 No.56078450 >>56078435 disingenuous

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:39:45 2023 No.56078474

>>56078435
anon, do you think any 2017-18 long term holder of XLM, as I assume you are with LINK, is satisfied with that bullshit pump after years of failing to break the original ATH? are you insane?
that's what you yearn for? a relief pump that will inevitably correct to the mean? pretty shitty expectations if you ask me lel
>>56078442
>Any other coin would pump to high heaven on the slightest hint of Swift news.
so where are these other coins dude? so far Uni has backfired

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:40:01 2023 No.56078477 >>56078412 Any coin pumps on good news. Fucking ANKR nearly did a 2x on Microsoft Azure news earlier this year. MICROSOFT AZURE

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:40:53 2023 No.56078486 File: 25 KB, 869x482, ....jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56078477 >ANKR uuhm yeah anon whatever you say

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:41:01 2023 No.56078489 >>56078474 >so where are these other coins dude? so far Uni has backfired what Uni was an example of a coin with NO news.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:41:25 2023 No.56078496 >>56078486 Are you saying it didn't pump on Microsoft Azure news?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:41:36 2023 No.56078498 >>56078489 ...so just like 99% of them? gotcha you're almost there kek

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:42:37 2023 No.56078504 >>56078498 >just like 99% of them? Yes exactly. Nearly all of them except Link.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:43:16 2023 No.56078511

>>56078496
I'm saying that pump is so insignificant it doesn't even show up on the chart
remember, LINK originally did a 36,000% move and you're all getting hyped up with a x2 a random shitcoin did a year ago
btw, that pump has been fully retraced so again, wtf is your point?
>>56078504
but LINK is just like them in terms of tokenomics and chart?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:44:34 2023 No.56078527 >>56078511 >that pump is so insignificant it doesn't even show up on the chart Doing nearly a 2x on Azure news is pretty huge lol By that same logic, Link should do a 200x on Swift news.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:45:18 2023 No.56078535 >>56078511 >but LINK is just like them in terms of tokenomics and chart? Not news and adoption.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:45:58 2023 No.56078540 >>56078527 >the only precedent presented about "pumping on news" so far is x2 and then falling right back down >but LINK should have done a x20 on SWIFT news alone ???? sorry, but I genuinely cannot follow that logic at all

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:46:25 2023 No.56078543 >>56078540 Wait, are you trying to argue that crypto doesn't pump on news?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:47:21 2023 No.56078553 >>56078535 and what has ever pumped on news and adoption before LINK is all I'm asking anon >>56078543 no, I'm arguing that after a certain point, the pumps are minuscule news work pretty good on brand new shitcoins and during bullruns

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:48:38 2023 No.56078567 >>56078553 >what has ever pumped on news and adoption before LINK What

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:49:57 2023 No.56078581 >>56078567 yes, that's what I'm asking for, what shitcoin has ever pumped on news and adoption and didn't inevitably blow up just like LINK did during 2018-20

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:53:31 2023 No.56078626 >>56078553 >I'm arguing that after a certain point, the pumps are minuscule That's relative, but in the case of Link they're not minuscule, they're non-existent. Wanna know why?

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:54:32 2023 No.56078637
File: 131 KB, 750x593, 1694451259390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Cuckold token that underperformed everything lol lmao
>September 4, 2020:
LINK: $12.50
BTC: $10,434
ETH: $388
BNB: $20.62
XRP: $0.23
ADA: $0.08
DOGE: $0.002
SOL: $2.71
TRX: $0.03
MATIC: $0.01

>September 4, 2023:
LINK: $5.96
BTC: $25,743
ETH: $1,623
BNB: $214.45
XRP: $0.50
ADA: $0.25
DOGE: $0.063
SOL: $19.36
TRX: $0.07
MATIC: $0.55

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:58:35 2023 No.56078675

>>56078474
>anon, do you think any 2017-18 long term holder of XLM, as I assume you are with LINK, is satisfied with that bullshit pump after years of failing to break the original ATH? are you insane?
Why move the goalpost? We are not talking about what XLM holders are thinking at all.

We are talking about how it is possible that a token that is almost identical to LINK in terms of marketcap, uncirculating supply (roughly 50%) and token emissions is OUTPERFORMING Chainlink on NO news while Chainlink got namedropped by SWIFT.

If you look at the 1Y charts as I suggested, it becomes apparent that there is something fucky going on with LINK. Fuddies biased against LINK will literally jump through a thousand hoops or move a thousand goalposts to not have to acknowledge this. Why?

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 16:59:23 2023 No.56078683

>>56078626
it's obvious, it's literally out of gas, no strength, no buying pressure, zero momentum
I don't buy the BTC dumpenings boogey anymore, I've seen matic making a new ATH just before BTC took a gigantic shit, and as soon as King Turd stabilized, matic kept going even harder shaping a "V" on the chart. It kinda reminded me of what LINK used to do in 2018-19, it was incredible really, and in the depths of the bear too
my theory is that LINK has been correcting after breaking a 3 year long parabola, essentially creating its own minicycle against the broader bear cycle, so in that sense, it was truly unique
BUT since then, it's dead, finito, kaput etc

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:01:05 2023 No.56078700

>>56078675
???
what the fuck do you mean, "how possible" it literally happens every day, I have no idea why you got such a hard on for XLM specifically
my point is your examples are shit, on a long enough timeframe, that pump amounts to nothing and it will inevitably correct back down where it started
Just like the pumps LINK has ;)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:01:12 2023 No.56078701 File: 209 KB, 2132x1206, 1665645604270034.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56078683 >it's obvious, it's literally out of gas, no strength, no buying pressure, zero momentum nope Chainlink is constantly trying to build up momentum

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:02:19 2023 No.56078714 >>56078701 sure, desu from my pov it simply follows the market but whatever, I know you're already committed to this

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:02:51 2023 No.56078719 anyway it's been fun but I got to go

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:04:17 2023 No.56078729 >>56077838 But I thought chainlink was a bear market coin?

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:15:21 2023 No.56078808

>>56078700
What the fuck are you talking about? Why even start an argument if you are just going to lose track of the main point after a few posts? Let me refresh your memory:

Anon here says:
>>56078250
>Normal behavior for 99% of shitcoins is to pump on news.
>Just to guve an example: uniswap has a tiny fraction of the Defi dominance of Chainlink and virtually zero institutional interest, AND it’s a governance token so quite literally useless.
>But it’s neck and neck with Link on Coinmarketcap.
You dodged this point by saying it's "akshually 4 places beneath LINK, so doesn't matter", which only holds true by the way because CM miscalculated UNI's circulating supply. So, the point stands. UNI does literally nothing and is keeping pace with Chainlink, while they are dumping more of the supply. How?

Because you refused to engage on that anon's point I brought up an even better example: XML. Not only did XLM catch up with LINK, it surpassed LINK and has been outperforming it for months! On what merit? On what news? If you can't answer this question, then what are you even arguing about?

Just let me know if you still can't follow the order of events here, fudfriend.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:19:40 2023 No.56078838 >>56078701 what are you suggesting? that they put chemicals in the chart that turns the frickin' price gay?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:29:23 2023 No.56078904 >>56078714 >it simply follows the market Well yes, when Bitcoin dumps hard enough the entire market crashes.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 17:35:33 2023 No.56078945

>>56075393
>banks will have to buy it
Lol. Lmao.
>>56078372
>Our best hope to pump the price is to convince the next generation of crypto buyers that it’s going to moon soon.
This is the most intelligent statement in this thread. Just like every other crypto (aka ponzis) the only demand for this garbage is from greedy speculators.

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 18:03:34 2023 No.56079167
File: 246 KB, 1164x975, 1694174847775246.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

the fud doesn't demoralize me, what does demoralize me is that the same people who own link are STILL dumb enough to argue with obvious fudders. How fucking dumb do you have to be, they've been posting the same arguments and leading you morons in the same circles for years now. stop fucking engaging retards.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 18:05:29 2023 No.56079188 >>56078945 >Lol. Lmao. He can't recognize his fellow fudders. Lol, lmao.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 18:40:44 2023 No.56079448 >>56075329 >why would I buy a can of Coke if the Coca Cola Company give it away at sponsor events and sells it to earn money?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 18:45:10 2023 No.56079501 >>56076265 Look up google or amazon charts from 2004 and explain that to us

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 18:49:41 2023 No.56079543 >>56079167 This is the real problem. That 24pbtid character is obviously here to muddy the waters and detract from any constructive conversation

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 19:29:52 2023 No.56079886

>>56079167
Link holders started this with their "fud reddit out" and anyone who didn't sell is now stuck eating this retarded "hiding strategy". Yeah, congrats OG linky ironic fudders, you successfully demoralized yourselves, potential retail investors, and biz itself - the only people who've won are the paid fudders, market shorters and scammers.

Congrats on that, seriously. Reddit will never own a piece of the 4th industrial revolution now!

Anonymous Mon Sep 11 19:35:06 2023 No.56079927

>>56078431
What you stupid niggers can't seem to understand when you post shit like this; Chainlink is tapping into GLOBAL banking infrastructure. Think about how many people there are in the world, can they afford to take part in the fourth industrial revolution? Do they even know that it's coming? We are watching a new technology revolutionize antiquated systems. Even if it takes 10 years to reach $1000, it is a sure thing. Why wouldn't you invest / stake LINK if the inevitable is bound to happen?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 19:54:15 2023 No.56080103 >>56078309 >I want to try a similar service, do you know? For stablecoins SpoolFi is a very good option, it allows you leverage on multiple yield farming platforms to earn yields.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 19:55:19 2023 No.56080116 >>56075329 Better add some fun and kas, setting yourself up for success later on

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 21:33:05 2023 No.56080992 >>56080103 Only stablecoins, no other assets?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 21:37:01 2023 No.56081019 >>56080992 yes, no other assets, it sucks

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 22:25:15 2023 No.56081347 >>56080992 I believe other assets will be coming with it's V2 which is set to go live in a matter of weeks.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 22:48:59 2023 No.56081529 >>56079927 this post made me buy more link

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 22:51:47 2023 No.56081544 >>56076409 This Btc actually has a usecase which is suppressing link

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 22:52:45 2023 No.56081547 >>56078431 sergay has to pay me eventually if i buy all the big macs

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 11 23:42:45 2023 No.56081829 >>56080103 >>56080992 >>56081019 Currynigger posts

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 00:13:57 2023 No.56081987 Okay, I'm bored now. How long is this staking shit?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 00:42:34 2023 No.56082122 >>56080992 The Apy on stablecoins are mostly little anon, I for one manage my risk on others like the Ldo/Eth LM pool or Dua on Allianceblock for decent yields.

Anonymous Tue Sep 12 01:29:15 2023 No.56082449

Reading this thread is quite depressing. Looks like even community advocates have abandoned the whole "utility and banks will make link pump". Our only hope is a retail speculative pump now, and it's ok because "that's how 99% of shitcoins do it and Chainlink's tokenomics are on par with this"

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 01:31:49 2023 No.56082461 >>56082122 Kill yourself currynigger

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 01:34:37 2023 No.56082477 >>56082449 ;-)

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 01:49:02 2023 No.56082559 >>56082477 Oh well

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 02:01:31 2023 No.56082646 >>56082559 The honest to god truth is no one fucking knows

Anonymous Tue Sep 12 02:55:48 2023 No.56082931

>>56082646
It is worrying about the future of Chainlink that they seem to treat the token only as a funding mechanism, they talk directly go clients and don't ask them to buy the token but rather ask them to give them fiat and pocket it while they release tokens from their supply. It's not very ethical

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 03:04:09 2023 No.56082977 >>56082461 Go fuck your mum ranjeesh

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 03:31:49 2023 No.56083111 >>56082977 Seethe more, third worlder

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 05:12:46 2023 No.56083541 >>56078009 Some newbies don't get it, folks just show up and buy random alts even when BTC's taking a hit. I grabbed more DUA, and soon users will be able to move cash from their linked bank account to a USDC pool

Anonymous Tue Sep 12 08:26:39 2023 No.56084029

What if there is a powerful institution that is actively accumulating LINK, but they also have massive BTC holdings, so their strategy is to set their LINK buy orders well below market price, then use their BTC to dump the entire market so that their lowball LINK orders fill? They can then sell their cheap LINK OTC to anyone who needs it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 08:50:12 2023 No.56084094 >>56079886 holy based https://youtu.be/amblWB_NLVU >discussing the importance of cyber security >animates a thin blue hexagon around the entire issue few.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 09:00:33 2023 No.56084130 >>5608409 How did you find this when it's only an hour old? >access enablers Holy fuck we're making it

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 09:04:10 2023 No.56084147 >>56084130 I'm not an avocado; I'm anon, that's how.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 13:24:31 2023 No.56085360 >>56078719 Lmao he was 2 min over shift. Ig they dont pay OT

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 13:29:55 2023 No.56085394 >>56084130 >>56084147 Gone already, damn. Timezone owned

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 13:58:12 2023 No.56085615 Did Bezos give out shares of Amazon for free back in the day? Is that where CL got the idea?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 14:45:30 2023 No.56085914 >>56075329 why would i pay tax if the gov just prints money for free?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 17:00:31 2023 No.56087055 >>56075329 Then just but QANX fucker. It's going to the moon as the private blockchain is live now >paper hands fade away

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 17:07:46 2023 No.56087114 >>56082931 Almost as if they are a business and not a pajeet scam

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 17:09:44 2023 No.56087133 >>56087114 More of a charity except donors dont get the tax deduction

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 18:29:29 2023 No.56087787 >>56075329 Anticipating SUPRA, the link killer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 19:09:22 2023 No.56088187 >>56087787 Is their only space for one oracle provider? I doubt SupraOracles beats Chainlink but I always fear if for some reason a project can actually make another irrelevant and make it go to zero

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 19:13:37 2023 No.56088240 File: 722 KB, 1268x714, 6F63FC54-0FCF-47F7-B7A1-6A2EEA71CDA2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56084094 Also within first few seconds there is this Jewish logo. This reeks of kikery ghjvj

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 19:23:08 2023 No.56088346 >>56087787 Oracles aren't heading anywhere without BTC driving the market while Allianceblock and Monero will ensure that the market is regulated...

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 19:30:44 2023 No.56088425 >>56076306 Can we just get over Link and move to oracles like DIA and Supra oracles?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 19:36:34 2023 No.56088485 >>56084094 Except that's an octagon, retard.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 20:39:47 2023 No.56089072 >>56088187 Dyor on supra oracles and come back to this thread. Chainlink is not even bridgeless but supra has that covered with hypernova.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 20:46:48 2023 No.56089129 >>56088346 Oracles are the backbone of blockchain tech, without them no real-world data will be communicated or leveraged for defi use.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 12 21:29:52 2023 No.56089470 >>56085914 why would i pay for anything?

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 13 01:22:04 2023 No.56091074 >>56089129 But real world assets have now dominated to blockchain space through Synthetix, Allianceblock, Maple finance etc without the help of any single oracle project... Why can't you prove yourself anon?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance