Chart

[Anonymous No.56039842]

[Anonymous No.56039860]

>>56039842
stinky linky if you know you know

[Anonymous No.56039875]

>>56039842
For every one success story like this there are a dozen failures you don't see. So explain to me why link is going to be a success story when the token is not needed...

[Anonymous No.56039878]

99.99% of cryptos never do an ETH. I sincerely hope you don't mean LINK, because there's no way it has the calibre, hype, or use case as ETH. Pic related is what's most likely gonna happen, perhaps even worse.

[Anonymous No.56039943]

Interesting reaction from simply posting the chart

[Anonymous No.56039962]

>>56039943
25 link threads up at a given time, when other shitcoins are confined to their generals. Mods have made this board so unusable, just throw a dart at a thread and chances are the pajeet that posted it is pushing link.

All so tiresome.

[Anonymous No.56039984]

>>56039842
>felipe barba

Shitskins pushing shitcoins again.

[Anonymous No.56040012]

tf is happening in this thread

[Anonymous No.56040029]

>>56040012

I posted the eth/tether chart and people are angry about something called chainlink

[Anonymous No.56040048]

>>56039943
>>56039962
>>56040012
>>56040029
Why are you ignoring my reply? See >>56039878 before it's too late.

[Anonymous No.56040077]

>>56040048
See my posts before you mass reply again faggot. You are just repeating what I said.

[Anonymous No.56040096]

>>56040077
Checked and my bad, you're right.

[Anonymous No.56040216]

>>56040048

99% of crypto is a rugpull and doesn't even pretend to be anything else. This is the main reason why this point is stupid, but the second is insitutional interest in crypto is still in babby beginnings. The ramifications of tradfi interest haven't even been felt yet, contra maxi oldfags.

The question anyone should ask themselves is "is crypto basically finished developing?" If you believe it is, which makes you a retard, nobody will hold ot against you.