Pay.

[Anonymous No.55975856]

Up.

[Anonymous No.55975866]

It insanes how projects are ok with paying rediculous money for chainlink when cheap alternate exist

[Anonymous No.55975876]

>deliberate forced ESL for attention
pathetic

[Anonymous No.55975884]

>>55975866
They fail under strain. Pay up. Or lose your "secured" funds. Your choice.

[Anonymous No.55977401]

>>55975876
>forced
no, some of them really are shit-eating third worlders
but yeah, no (you)s regardless for em

[Anonymous No.55977430]

So these poor hapless protocols have to pay for MEV mafia protection, VC extortion (((charges))), and a FLIPPING oracle bill????

WHERE DOES IT END??

!!!

[Anonymous No.55977438]

[Anonymous No.55977509]

>>55975856
NPC. No one is paying though, says a lot about chainlink

[Anonymous No.55977513]

>>55977509
Oh they’re paying

[Anonymous No.55977849]

>>55977513
Waoh they're sending CELO tokens to Sergey?? We made it boys!

[Anonymous No.55978551]

>>55977849
Kek

[Anonymous No.55978570]

>>55975884
INDUSTRY STANDARD

[Anonymous No.55978573]

>>55975856
wtf

[Anonymous No.55978602]

>>55975866
>when cheap alternate exist
haha yeah, """cheap"""

[Anonymous No.55978609]

>and then for no reason at all all the defi markets created their own data feeds

[Anonymous No.55978622]

>>55978609
Sounds like a good ide-ACK

[Anonymous No.55978628]

>>55975866

[Anonymous No.55978636]

>>55978622
and yet they keep doing it even when chainlink is subsidizing their oracles with your money
what do you think happens when they start trying to charge money?

[Anonymous No.55978640]

Pay up bitch!

[Anonymous No.55978641]

>>55978636
Pay up.

[Anonymous No.55978656]

>>55978641
for data which must be publicly available in order for chainlink's tech to function?

don't be surprised when the inevitable happens.

[Anonymous No.55978658]

ahem:
token _ _
LINK/_ chart
chainlink is _ _

[Anonymous No.55978659]

>>55978640
>>55978641
Lol it's the marines paying. Keep paying marine!

[Anonymous No.55978660]

>>55978636
>when they start trying to charge money

[Anonymous No.55978664]

>>55978656
Pay up.

[Anonymous No.55978669]

>>55978660
>can only get partnerships with failed networks
kek, watching you guys lose money has been fun, i'll say that

[Anonymous No.55978685]

>>55978664
>Here Sergey, have these Celo tokens
>Now you can pay the nodes with your premint
>the marines will eat it up don't worry

[Anonymous No.55978687]

>>55978636
>they keep doing it
Not really. Like 90% of Defi runs on Chainlink oracles.
Maker was probably the last major holdout but even they are officially backed by Chainlink now.

[Anonymous No.55978689]

>>55978669
>>55978687

oof, look at the goalposts fly!

[Anonymous No.55978699]

>>55978669
>>55978685
oof, look at the goalposts fly!

[Anonymous No.55978704]

>>55978699
chart

[Anonymous No.55978710]

>>55978704
There they go again!

[Anonymous No.55978715]

>>55978659
Thanks for the tip

[Anonymous No.55978717]

kek look at this seething poorfag frantically trying to cope while his shitcoin outperforms the market in dumping

[Anonymous No.55978729]

>>55978717
If you want to fud the price, then fud the price.

Don't start trying to spout some easily debunked bullshit and then revert to "muh chart" after you get backed into a corner.
It diminishes the effect.

[Anonymous No.55978734]

>it's still going
holy shit these baggies have lost it

[Anonymous No.55978754]

>>55978656
>data which must be publicly available in order for chainlink's tech to function
This makes no sense whatsoever.
Chainlink could make the feeds private today if they wanted. But then we wouldn’t all get to see how they outperform all other oracles.

[Anonymous No.55978759]

>>55978729
Sergey got Celo tokens, none was sold for Link. Token not needed no paying customer. No one is cornered but you lol. Celo tokens lol, and they're not even sent to stakers so they can dump them. And you're paying for this, everyone is laughing at you

[Anonymous No.55978764]

>>55978759
>nobody's paying!
>ok so they are paying, but token not needed!

[Anonymous No.55979143]

>>55978699
>goalposts
if only you spent this much time watching the chart you'd have known 2020 was your last chance to sell

[Anonymous No.55979146]

>>55978754
and nobody would use them because they'd be untrusted blind feeds
chainlink ONLY works when the data is 100% public, auditable, and available to any and all "competitors"

it's a moatless protocol and that's rooted deeply into its design

[Anonymous No.55979170]

>>55979146
>chainlink ONLY works when the data is 100% public, auditable, and available to any and all "competitors"
What on earth makes you even say that?
The fact that the feeds are public only makes them auditable after the fact, when they already posted on-chain.

Literally nothing about the feeds requires them to be public in order to work.

[Anonymous No.55979231]

Buck Broken Baggieeees

[Anonymous No.55979350]

>>55979170
if they're not public, nodes can't access the data, or the only nodes that can can collude as long as the data isn't public, and keep colluding in perpetuity.

chainlink's entire model only works when the turnaround time is near instantaneous and that means they simply can't ever create a moat for their services.

[Anonymous No.55979359]

>>55979350
This is the stankiest bullshit I have ever read

Also I paid up :) does that make you mad? I hope it does

[Anonymous No.55979378]

>>55975884
XRP fails under strain? Well that's the first Im hearing about it.. Please, tell us more.

[Anonymous No.55979527]

>>55979350
>if the feeds are not public, nodes can't access the data
Anon, the nodes make the feeds.

They don’t need to acces what they’re about to make in order to make it, that’s insanely stupid.

[Anonymous No.55979587]

>100 millions hacks left and right, VCs owning half your supply and dumping whenevr they want, MEV mafia extracting millions daily in pure parasitism: good
>paying essential services so they're safe and sustainable: bad!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.55979592]

>>55977438
kek

[Anonymous No.55979645]

>>55977849
>>55978685
>>55978759
>chainlink h-has no paying customers
>ok they have customers paying exhorbitant amounts but in their tokens
>yes, they might have sold those tokens already into cash
>b-but they didn't buy LINK tokens
>no, we never claimed link had no paying customers, only that those customers don't buy the LINK token

Fudders are the most dishonest pieces of shit ever conceived. I guess getting BTFO time after time and having to hide away and change versions everytime does a number to your psyche huh

[Anonymous No.55979657]

>>55979527
and yet everybody else does for it to be useful. there is no market is blind oracles.

[Anonymous No.55979686]

It's increasingly obvious link will flip ETH.

[Anonymous No.55979716]

>>55979657
The users who are paying for the feeds do not need them to be public, at all. If the feeds turned dark, they would obviously still have access to them as paying customers.
Only the ones not paying for the feeds benefit from them being public.
How are you this clueless about basic things like this.

[Anonymous No.55980283]

>>55979716
if you can't access the data the trust model of chainlink literally doesn't work. it can't be validated and bad actors can't be held accountable. they become too risky to use for any financial purpose.
you guys don't even know how your decrepit bags work?

[Anonymous No.55980341]

>>55980283
>it can’t be validated and bad actors can’t be held accountable
Sure it can, and sure they can.
Just not by any random member of the public, which users may or may not want.

[Anonymous No.55981918]

>>55979645
Bagholders are so retarded it's crazy. The "im glad sergey is getting paid" is equivalent to the "im here for the tech cope"

If it isn't going directly into the token, it's meaningless to anybody that holds Chainlink token as an investment asset.

[Anonymous No.55981963]

>>55981918
>If it isn't going directly into the token
All node fees are. Nodes literally cannot be paid in anything but Link.

[Anonymous No.55982155]

>>55981963

don't reply to them they get paid if you reply to them.

[Anonymous No.55982182]

>>55982155
Paranoid

[Anonymous No.55982796]

>>55982155
Most link fudders do it for free.

[Anonymous No.55982882]

Check the chart

[Anonymous No.55982959]

>>55978729
>le secret technology that only me and my weaving buddies know about it

>its daaa future!!!!

ohhhhhhhhhhhh cultieeeeee

Also, chart

[Anonymous No.55983091]

>>55975856
i lost 90% of my holdings i paid up lol

[Anonymous No.55983158]

>>55982959
>>le secret technology that only me and my weaving buddies know about it
haha what?
Chainlink is getting shilled by Google, Bank of America, Swift, Eric Schmidt, Citibank, ....
It's the furthest thing from "secret technology" you moron.