It won’t stop until

[Anonymous No.55878661]

Michael sailor is liquidated
Liq. Price $3.500

[Anonymous No.55878802]

Prices like that haven't been seen since the beginning of COVID, and that was well before institutional money flooded into the space. The only money that left during this bear market were the VC's and paperhands (yes the VC's are needed for it go back to ATH's again, but the point is that you won't see $3.5k again unless there's a global economic super-depression with the USA on verge of collapse amidst world war 3 type of situation). The FTX collapse only brought it down to $15k, now how much of a catastrophe would be needed for $3.5k?

[Anonymous No.55878892]

>>55878802
>how much of a catastrophe would be needed for $3.5k
Not much, Binance collapse and USDT depegg would be enough
The crypto market is faker than your mom titties

[Anonymous No.55878942]

>>55878661
What a coincidence. There just happens to be a CME gap at $3500 (which has left Bitcoin vulnerable to a colossal correction).

[Anonymous No.55878968]

>>55878942
>it's vulnerable because math jews said so

[Anonymous No.55879172]

>>55878802
You parrot so many normalfaggot things in your post it's kind of impressive.
> #1 associates the March 2020 (actually had already bugun in February) crash with the meme virus, thinking it had anything to do with it, not knowing the chart already looked bearish (for instance the 1W Stoch RSI in Feb 2020 was very high)
> #2 MUH INSTITUTIONS -- hoooly shit
> #3 thinks VC's matter
> #4 is so new to crypto that he thinks BTC dumping to 3.5k would require "a global economic super-depression with the USA on verge of collapse amidst world war 3 type of situation", not knowing that 69k to 3.5k would only be 1% deeper than several previous bottoms
> #5 thinks the FTX event was what brought the price to 15.5k, not knowing the chart looked like shit prior to any FTX-news
> #6 thinks FTX collapsing was a "catastrophe"

[Anonymous No.55880549]

>>55878661
Saylor cant be liquidated.

[Anonymous No.55880558]

>>55878661
its simply not true his liquidation is much much much higher

[Anonymous No.55880621]

>>55880558
True, but his liquidation at $9800 will cause a cascade to $3500.

Believe it.

[Anonymous No.55881002]

>>55879172
'I didn't buy the bottom'