HDN HYDRANET

[Anonymous No.55828735]

when are you going to apologize, /biz/?

[Anonymous No.55828833]

>>55828735
$5 when?

[Anonymous No.55828897]

>>55828833
depends how long the public dex release takes, i wouldn't be surprised if there's a spike to $5 during the launch but a lot of long term holders will also be dumping

[Anonymous No.55828956]

>>55828833
>>55828897

No one cares cryptofaggots

[Anonymous No.55829798]

>>55828833
>Double dubs.
Checked.
>$5 when?
Will probably take a few months. Need more pairs on DEX.

[Anonymous No.55829801]

How about after they rug and rebrand for the 4th time?

[Anonymous No.55830766]

>>55828735
if this doesnt hit top 100 within a month of mainnet dex release ill eat my hat

[Anonymous No.55831314]

DASH FORK PIECE OF SHIT

[Anonymous No.55831502]

>>55828735
Shill your vaporware somewhere else. It's truly amazing that they've managed to find enough suckers to keep buying this over six years and three rebrands so far – first POSWcoin, then Stakenet and now Hydranet – without ever releasing a single working product. Even if by some miracle they did pull a working product out of their asses, it will fail like every other atomic swap DEX before it because the setup is too complex and time-consuming for the average crypto user to be bothered with (see AtomicDEX, Blocknet, Basicswap, etc.) and because they'll never be able to attract sufficient liquidity because of their abysmal marketing track record. Also, token not needed.

[Anonymous No.55831527]

>>55828897
>depends how long the public dex release takes
so literally never

[Anonymous No.55832376]

They're apparently finally "getting close" to completing their tests and "getting close" to the release.

This is the same exact rhetoric they were spouting 3 years ago. They make up fake photoshopped images and PowerPoint presentations showing transactions happening but they never release anything because the "team" gets into "arguments" and decides to leave the project, rugging everything back to 1c while they're at it.

Don't bother.

[Anonymous No.55832558]

>>55829801
>>55831502
>>55831527
>>55832376
Ex-baggies who are going to rope when this thing succeeds despite all odds. Remember, the most entertaining outcome is the most likely. What's more entertaining than a 3 times rug turning into a legit project and all the ex-baggies roping?

[Anonymous No.55833116]

>be biz
>have confidence in the dream and product XSN is pitching at ATH
>actual scammer team gets removed and replaced with trusted team and solid devs
>development occurs for two years and mainnet release is imminent
>never DCA’d at 90-99% of the ATH price
>salt

[Anonymous No.55833191]

>>55833116
>>actual scammer team gets removed and replaced with trusted team and solid devs
Imagine believing this. The "replacement" of the anonymous scammer devs by anonymous trusted team and solid devs is a standard story arc of every vaporware scam.
https://hydranet.ai/en/team
Surely Walleye, McFinity, Smurf, T-Rex and Saggy won't let us down!

[Anonymous No.55833231]

>>55833191
Imagine saying things without knowing what you’re talking about

[Anonymous No.55833241]

>>55833191
This is why this is going to make so many people rope. It totally looks like a scam from outside. But a few people, the people who made the mutiny happen, actually know the team and know it's legit, the people close to the multisig, who have read the source code.... I'm going to laugh so hard at you ex-baggies.

[Anonymous No.55833279]

>>55833191
Nah, these guys are all genius-level devs who will be the first in the entire crypto space to succeed where all others have failed in releasing a successful cross-chain DEX with deep liquidity. They could have launched their own completely new DEX under their own brand but instead decided to step in and save the dying Hydranet project and its legion of badholders out of the goodness of their hearts because reasons.

[Anonymous No.55833372]

>>55833279
The reason is the stakenet source code had 80% of the problem cracked with the first successful cross chain channel swap. They needed that code. From there it was a matter of fixing stability and reliability problems.

[Anonymous No.55833480]

>>55833372
Oh yeah sure, because of course some random band of nobodies, working on almost no budget, are the ones that have "cracked the code" to an extremely complex problem. A problem that companies with billions of dollars dev budget haven't been able to solve. Sure buddy.

[Anonymous No.55833507]

>>55833480
The problem was cracked in theory in a paper years ago. Stakenet has a very talented anon dev who implemented it but then moved on to other things. The remaining devs flailed around and couldn't complete it as a stable product. Then the community rebelled and a few talented SWEs took it to the finish line. Like I said, totally implausible from the outside. I don't expect you to believe me. But I do expect you to rope.

[Anonymous No.55834098]

>>55833116
How did the scammer team just let go of the discord, telegram and Twitter (now X thank you felon musk) accounts to this new team? Joe Park was just a Discord mod and not an admin during the Stakenet days. I'll buy but they have to explain that part.

[Anonymous No.55834220]

>>55834098
Everything was controlled by Draper. He wasn't a scammer, his was a just a bad manager and in over his head. The new team used community/DAO to put the pressure on him and he stepped down and handed over all the keys and control. I think he was happy to do it because they saved his bags and bailed him out of a situation he couldn't handle.

[Anonymous No.55834393]

>>55834220
S/o to Victo for forcing his hand to give up control

[Anonymous No.55834939]

>>55833507
If its been cracked in theory why doesn't any other "very talented dev" just read up on the theory and do it then?!

Oh let me guess, your dev was the super special godly dev that mysteriously appeared, did everything and disappeared again into thin air without wanting any credit. Because that makes total sense.

[Anonymous No.55835250]

>>55834939
You can literally download the test net DEX right now and try it for yourself. Mainnet beta has been released to a group and it works there too! Go try it for yourself before coming at me sideways. hydranet.ai/en/DEX

[Anonymous No.55835397]

>>55835250
Bruh, I aint clicking that link, don't wanna install some obscure exe and compromise my metamask or some shit.

[Anonymous No.55835550]

>>55835397
Then keeping spewing bs and look like a fool. You are good at it.

[Anonymous No.55835720]

>>55828735

22% lol who gives a fuck

[Anonymous No.55835738]

>>55831314

[Anonymous No.55837591]

>>55834098
The Hydranet 2022 Recap covers the mutiny, its cause, the transfer of power, etc in full detail. It also explains Jo Park's origin.
>Jo Park started with the old team as a community moderator, gradually moving up to writing announcements, providing DEX support, writing articles (including German translations), running or administering social media accounts, and public relations. Despite working with the Stakenet team for quite some time, there was a consistent lack of communication between its internal groups that made it very difficult to make clear announcements and PR. After he was given little information about Stakenet DEX in the leadup to its disastrous December 2021 launch, he formally resigned. In the aftermath, Jo Park remained active as a community member and provided voluntary support to both the old and new team. He was highly-trusted within the community from his many years assisting people and was deemed the best fit to serve as the new leader of HDX.
https://medium.com/hydranet/hydranet-2022-yearly-recap-2482b7f4aa49

The staff had virtually nothing to do with the hardcore XSN shilling on /biz/. It was 99% a community effort, and a sincere one. The DEX has attracted a particular kind of intense autism and schizophrenia for years - overtly positive and negative.
Layer 3 off-chain DEXs are just now becoming something mainstream. The days of autists and schizos fighting with each other over the viability of such a model for 12 hours straight in obscure corners of the internet are a thing of old.
To all those anons who remember XSN and wondered whether it was legitimate or not, I advise you to read the article to get the full truth.

[Anonymous No.55837845]

>>55828735
From what I know the current team is actually trying to deliver a project but they aren't the most qualified and I wouldn't touch their software even if I was paid to. The worst of it is that they further scammed the hoards of baggies who swapped from XSN to HDX by diluting the shit out of their holdings. Then when that wasn't enough they changed their website to have ".ai" at the end and changed the ticker to "HDN" and further diluted baggies by making the new supply 300m from 170m HDX and allocating it to the "team/development". They are relentless scammers who can't even keep their story straight and who unironically think Chainlink is a scam compared to them.

[Anonymous No.55837890]

>>55837845
>le chainlink baggie seething
one in every thread

[Anonymous No.55837922]

>>55837890
So anon, are you going to explain or just laugh at chainlink? Oh, nvm you're just trying to distract people from the rest of what I said. Nice.

[Anonymous No.55838021]

>shady OTC deals
>new UI every 'dex' release
>hype airdrop
>no airdrop only ticker update
>turk spam

[Anonymous No.55838044]

>>55837922
Chainlink is a centralized data feed. Its "security" is based on post facto reputation. Nothing prevents scammers from developing a reputation and then oracle-exploiting any dependent network. CCIP is a "trust" WEF solution. Even if it works there is a huge market for cross chain dex that doesn't go through chainlink's centralized WEF scheme. Thus HDX is not a competitor.

>distract from rest of what I said
You contradicted yourself by saying current team is trying to deliver a project and then called it a scam for paying for development. You outed yourself as a seething ex-baggie who sold the bottom. Classic linkie manuever.

[Anonymous No.55838050]

>>55838021
Let's not forget about the massive apy % the scammers took advantage of during the rebrand before removing staking completely

[Anonymous No.55838060]

>>55838050
Everyone who held during that time got the same APY for staking. Seeth more, ex-baggie.

[Anonymous No.55838136]

>>55833241
>>55833279
>>55833372
>>55833480
You can literally do this using ICP.

I was extremely bullish on xsn before (the concept anyways) but at this point, ICP literally solves this.

[Anonymous No.55838164]

>>55838136
It's true ICP solves this but there are no usable cross chain dexes out on ICP yet and probably won't be any more at least a year. There are even other solutions in works I could mention but again they're not this year. That's plenty of time for hype train to make a run on HDN

[Anonymous No.55838448]

reminder that victo slurps nigger balls

[Anonymous No.55839137]

>>55828735
/biz/ is such a pathetic board. Its 2023 and you retards are still shilling this lmao

[Anonymous No.55839149]

>>55839137
People still shill Apple in 2023.

[Anonymous No.55839236]

Fudders BTFO big time.
$10 EOY.
https://twitter.com/TheHydranet/status/1691186292246093824

[Anonymous No.55840859]

is it finally happening!

[Anonymous No.55841530]

>>55840859
Yes

[Anonymous No.55842091]

Serious question. Who are the actual devs? Not the PR, marketing, team lead etc, but actual devs implementing this stuff? Are they ever voicing anything? I bet they are, AT LEAST 50% as autistically genius as money skeleton is, right..? Right? I hear a lot about these mystical "devs" doing god's work in the background, but I hardly hear anything at all from them. Who are they? What are they doing, and what do they think about the technical challenges they are going through?

[Anonymous No.55842135]

>>55842091
The lead dev is Philipp, a german. But the core cross chain magic was done by earlier anon dev. There has been a lot of optimization, security, and stability improvements to bring it from prototype to functional product though.

[Anonymous No.55842302]

>>55842091
>autistically genius as money skeleton is
>autistically genius