[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 227 KB, 1194x1168, 952A1E0B-77E8-45B5-875B-6809E39EE62B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55617538 No.55617538 [Reply] [Original]

Chainlink tokens are actually needed now

>> No.55617554

>>55617538
Rent free, linktard

>> No.55617581

>>55617554
I meant to use another pic but my finger slipped. Sorry for triggering you xrpee

>> No.55617618

still uncertainty whether it is a security or not
not touching it with a 10 foot pole

>> No.55617630

>>55617618
This is a link thread, not cripple

>> No.55618212
File: 277 KB, 1073x845, Screenshot_20210304-122218_Instagram.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55618212

Holy shit someone actually took the time to draw this

>> No.55619634

Chainlink is a blatant scam, let me explain you why:
LINK's javascript has been hacked and now all the nodes are being affected, meaning they will go offline one by one.
But here's the real trick; every node that goes offline first has to be validated by other nodes, Thus the first node won't go offline until EVERY SINGLE NODE has verified it actually has gone offline
LINK will be in an infinite javascript loop. Maybe if you're a programmer you will recognize FOR and WHILE loops. Well.. This is a FOR loop that NEVER ends.
The price will TANK to at least 50 satoshi. Maybe even lower when the nodes are actually verified being offline.
Sergey is now busy setting up extra nodes to undo this process. Called contra-hacking. He has injected some GO-language code, pseudo-offline code, into the ChainLink network. This means nodes will appear the be online, while they are struggling to go offline, but in the meantime they cant because it isnt verified yet. Neat trick if you ask me, but it wont last long before the other nodes will know whats really going on.

Get into something else now

>> No.55619825

>>55617538
no they're not