/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.55606781]

>tfw we're about to suck up the entire value in the cryptosphere.
soon link will moon while btc and eth and every other shitcoin dumps

[Anonymous No.55606797]

>>55606781
>to
>moar
>weaks
>submuweens

[Anonymous No.55606803]

If that's were true, why isn't the price reflecting that?

[Anonymous No.55606813]

Link is going to top 3, fuddies will rope

[Anonymous No.55606817]

Token not needed.
>July 7, 2020
>LINK: $6.47
>BTC: $9,108
>ETH: $246
>BNB: $16.77
>ADA: $0.12
>SOL: $0.75
>DOGE: $0.003
>LTC: $43
>MATIC: $0.02
>TRX: $0.01
>XRP: $0.19

>July 7, 2023
>LINK: $6.16
>BTC: $30,342
>ETH: $1,868
>BNB: $236
>ADA: $0.28
>SOL: $21.90
>DOGE: $0.06
>LTC: $98
>MATIC: $0.68
>TRX: $0.079
>XRP: $0.47

[Anonymous No.55606831]

>>55606781
>>55606797
>>55606803
>>55606817

fuddie replies in 3 minutes or less should tell you all you need to know

[Anonymous No.55606842]

>>55606781
Give it two years

[Anonymous No.55606843]

>>55606831
Yeah, it's weird but honestly I'm new here. Why isn't there speculation over the price of LINK?

[Anonymous No.55606866]

>>55606817
Maybe try a different date than just the 7th.

[Anonymous No.55606870]

>>55606843
you're 6 years and 2 million threads late. enjoy your (you)s

[Anonymous No.55606885]

>>55606781
Kek, when has btc dumping ever been good for LINK? When it comes to crypto a rising tide raises all ships. I’m afraid LINK may not see any substantial pump until the next btc halvening.

[Anonymous No.55606888]

>>55606870
You mean I shouldn't buy it?

[Anonymous No.55606901]

>>55606888
i mean if you're looking for price speculation threads you're mostly getting baggies and fuddies arguing between 1k eoy and token not needed. all the good discussions are dead. buy it or not

[Anonymous No.55606909]

>>55606781
The token simply isn't needed.

[Anonymous No.55606925]

>>55606843
Because you're about 6 years late and Link is a premined ICO shitcoin well past it's 2019 Defi and Google partnership scam prime.

[Anonymous No.55606943]

>>55606888
for example:
>>55606909
>>55606925
this man is either
a)brown and paid to shit up threads and derail discussions with tired talking points
b)a former linkholder who lost it most/all of his stack
c) a link holder
d)all of the above

[Anonymous No.55606956]

>>55606781
I love you LINK!

[Anonymous No.55606975]

>>55606943
I sold my 15,000 LINK in 2019 and here to remind the bag holders that they will never see ATH ever again.

[Anonymous No.55606981]

>>55606956
why does she have eth in her hair? fuck eth and fuck vitalik.

[Anonymous No.55606994]

>>55606901
Yeah, it's insane how LINK threads here are just so different than other tokens. I can't decide what to do, you either have diehard fans who praise it and promise ridiculous prices or haters who trash it all the time. No inbetween.

>>55606943
I believe it's more likely it's b) and d).

[Anonymous No.55606999]

>>55606975
so you're saying you made $30k on 15k linkies. great job gigabrain

[Anonymous No.55607014]

>>55606909
>>55606925
>>55606975
If you really sold, why are you wasting your time here? Shouldn't you be somewhere else? And I'm a software developer, and Chainlink is by far one of the top 5 projects in this space in terms of development. I just can't tell why the price of the token isn't reflecting the work they're doing. There must be something we're missing here.

[Anonymous No.55607034]

>>55606999
I don't remember, but whatever 15,000 x $39 is.
All of that money is now in real estate and BTC. I don't do shitcoins anymore and bag holders should learn to NEVER marry their shitcoins.
The only value a shitcoin can ever have us it's speculative potential. Something that's pumped and dumped like LINK has exhausted all speculative potential and thus no value and a slow bleed back to zero. Every shitcoin goes to zero in the end.

Just like Vechain, they are trying to keep the scam running by finding new faux purposes for their shitcoin, but these will only momentarily delay the end.

[Anonymous No.55607038]

>>55606781
Is this it?

[Anonymous No.55607061]

>>55607014
good rule for biz is mentally filter out the top and bottom 10% hyperbole. this dude >>55607034 falls in the bottom by a long shot.

[Anonymous No.55607129]

>>55607034
I like the fact the story in your post is as real as the women in the photo you paired with it, nice synergy.

[Anonymous No.55607138]

>>55606781
We are here only for technology

[Anonymous No.55607152]

>>55607129
I can dig out and find you my Kraken transaction history from 2019, but then again you're a desperate bagholder and your opinion means almost nothing to me.

Do you actually think most of us 2017 OGs kept holding after $50?!
Lol
Lemao

[. No.55607181]

>>55606888
Checked. No one cares if you buy or not. Link holders at this point are either all-in and waiting for the inevitable, or deranged fud addicts who spend all day lurking biz for a chance to post
>kek baggies
>token not needed
>fat man bad

[. No.55607204]

>>55606975
Fuck me it's even sadder than I could imagine. Please be joking, for your sake.

[Anonymous No.55607207]

>>55607181
You do understand that LINK bagholders need a whole new cohort of greater fools to inject their capital to inflate your worthless shitcoin bags in order to cash out with a profit, right?

It doesn't work if you can't find new idiots to feed the bottom of your shitcoin pyramid...
So yes, they VERY MUCH need to recruit new bagholders.

[Anonymous No.55607234]

>>55607152
No you can’t kek
I can show you my 10k staked. But you probably have more than me staked.

[Anonymous No.55607242]

>>55607014
turns out he was a)
the whole thread is just arguing with one asshole instead of answer your question. go figure.

[Anonymous No.55607248]

>>55607181
Yeah, it's getting boring at this point. I guess I'll just keep following the project until some huge change in price performance before I decide to buy.

[Anonymous No.55607268]

>>55607248
read some of the other CCIP threads and make your own call.

[Anonymous No.55607279]

>>55607242
I really hope he's paid, otherwise it's just sad.

>>55607268
Will do, thanks Anon.

[Anonymous No.55607297]

>>55607234
>But you probably have more than me staked.

Jesus no. Why would I ever commit to giving my digital assets to an organization with a premine, corrupt distribution and routine dumps to the spot market?
Are you mentally ill or a natural cuck?

[Anonymous No.55607312]

>tfw staking only 3.5k LINK and lost the powerball tonight
im ngmi bros...

[Anonymous No.55607317]

>>55607312
>3,500 LINK

How does $4,800 US dollars by EoY 2024 sound?

[Anonymous No.55607329]

>>55607317
not that good tbqh desu

[Anonymous No.55607333]

>>55607297
You’re trying way too hard. How many wallets did you get in? 50k chads will probably be able to live off staking within the next year.

[Anonymous No.55607358]

>>55607333
>Hurrr hurr everyone that knows LINK is a shitcoin well past its prime is a masochist FUDing his own bags

This is why I come here since 2019 and defecate on the Reddit-tier bagholder community that has formed from the remnants of those who failed to sell above $30.
I can feel the mental anguish and despair under the false veneer of conviction and confidence.

[Anonymous No.55607364]

I dunno if it can happen but I think LINK is more useful than BTC and Sergey's company is better than blockstream.. I think LINK can surpass btc, even if maybe for a moment

[Anonymous No.55607368]

>>55607364
>I think LINK can surpass btc

t. The most reasonable, savvy and well educated LINK bagholder to ever live.

[. No.55607372]

>>55607207
I reckon you do it for free

[Anonymous No.55607385]

>>55607358
100k+? Are you that guy who had like 20+ wallets lined up when general access opened? If I had to put money on it, its either that or you’re a top buyer that missed it and is bitter for having been “fooled”.

[Anonymous No.55607404]

>>55606803
Its uncomfortable being early

[Anonymous No.55607412]

>>55607385
>Goes down with the ship

t. Every shitcoiner who missed the top, then missed the dead cat bounce, then missed the long slide down, then failed to sell when there was still an exchange with an active market for his shitcoin...

[Anonymous No.55607423]

>>55607404
>being early

[Anonymous No.55607446]

>>55607423

[Anonymous No.55607448]

>>55607014
We have all been wondering this since 2018
But its a combination of things
1) There is a faction of ETH maxis that despise chainlink
2) Most people have no idea why Chainlink is valuable
3) There are forces who are intentionally suppressing the price (Not sure how likely this is)

Two and one are blatantly clear at this point though. Bankless refuses to mention Chainlink by name. Vitalik refuses to mention Chainlink by name, even though Sergey and team are bolstering the utility of ETH.

As we continue to rise though we'll continue to garner the attention of the general populous and number two will resolve itself. Number one absolutely stumps me though.

[Anonymous No.55607484]

>>55607448
Well number 1 is self evident, the entire value proposition of eth is that its a walled garden, and also the most popular walled garden. If you open access to other chains, the mechanisms that increase eth’s price evaporate, and if you’re an eth maxi because of price (99% of them), you’re in opposition to chainlink as financially they are the enemy.

I actually think Vitalik’s motives are his own autistic fully on chain utopia idealism. But the rest of the eth community just wants number to go up.

[Anonymous No.55607488]

>>55607448
>Number one absolutely stumps me though.

Isn't it obvious?
They hate it for the same reason we all hate XRP, FTX and VeChain.
It's an premined air token, with a corrupt distribution, an ICO, it's an illegal security (so un-investable by corporations and institutions) and is offshore to avoid regulations and criminal liability, just like FTX.

Do you think some private company in the US can get away with createing their own "token", print trillions of it, claim it has "utility" and then make false claims of corporate partnerships, sell it to a gullible public, followed by immediate dumping to the spot markets?

The answer is no. Everyone of those things is highly illegal, which is why FTX went down and why Chainlink is no different than FTX. It's not ethical, it has no utility and in 6 years has not delivered any viable products, so it's not even a successful software company. They are alive only thanks to the bagholder community who support the failing price by locking up their supply while the issuer dumps for dear life.

[Anonymous No.55607495]

>>55607448
Okay so basically LINK tokens have value because you can stake them to earn more LINK tokens which are valuable because you can use them to stake more tokens. Thats what gives the token its value.

[Anonymous No.55607519]

>>55607495
So where do the LINK tokens to pay out NEET nodes come from?

[Anonymous No.55607523]

>>55607488
I understand you are ironically fudding but you didn't even directly address the contradiction that perplexes me in my claim.

I will reiterate. Chainlink is good for ETH. SWIFT is going to use Chainlink to connect to ETH. This is good for ETH holders. So they shouldn't hate Chainlink, but they do.

I guess its an ideological thing, which makes sense for Vitalik to feel this way (he's already rich) but for the average ETH holder/investor, they should be gushing over link.

[Anonymous No.55607527]

>>55607448
Chainlink is crypto for adults. The crypto space consists mostly of anarchist/lolbert types who fantasize about the world adopting their crappy decentralized versions of everything and the big players going out of business. The world is never going to adopt crypto the way they want it to happen, but it will be used widely where it actually serves a purpose. Chainlink is making that happen in a real way, but the crypto world hates that because they are basically working with what anarcho-autists perceive as the enemy.

[Anonymous No.55607533]

>>55607484
Go into more detail on this for me
Is it because the layer 2 value proposition becomes perhaps less desirable?

[Anonymous No.55607538]

>>55607495
No, LINK tokens have value because they are used to buy oracle services.

[Anonymous No.55607545]

>>55607538
Theoretically, sure.

[Anonymous No.55607551]

>>55607523
Its ideological for Vitalik. But for the majority, its financial. If more people use Ethereum, but it gets reduced to a settlement layer while majority of transactions occur on private permissioned chains, ETH number does not go up like it used to. And there is the possibility it even gets phased out completely at some point.

Chainlink fucks up the exchange/VC money trough grift for everyone. Its good for retail (the ones who ignore all advertising and understand what it is) and good for tradfi that wants to utilize DLT without buying a bunch of random shitcoins, its just bad for the current top dogs in the space.

[Anonymous No.55607573]

>>55607551
I see, I guess I hadn't really thought this through properly. I had assumed that everything Sergey and team were doing were good for ETH holders.

I mean Sergey has consistently reiterated that the trillions of value that will flow from TradFi into the blockchain space will lift all boats.

[Anonymous No.55607576]

>>55607523
>Chainlink is good for ETH.

The only thing Chainlink is good for is Chainlink.
No one needs Chainlink, certainly not ETH, and most definitely not Bitcooin.
ETH, just like LINK, is a shitcoin with no purpose, a centralized, opaque monetary policy run by anonymous trannies close to Vitalik (the CEO) that instantly makes it a security. The unilimited circulation makes it un-investable as well by any serious institutions.

>SWIFT is going to use Chainlink
They are not. It's another case of fraudulent misrepresentation by Chainlink, just like the Google "partnership", Gartner, Gravelcoin, Oracle etc. etc. ad nauseam.
Fraudulent corporate partnerships only benefit Chainlink (like in 2019) and not ETH.

>I guess its an ideological thing
No, it's just a shitcoin rivalry.
Shitcoins are merely competing for money that flows into Bitcoin, like the parastic bottom feeders they are.

[Anonymous No.55607590]

>>55607527
>Chainlink is shitcoin for adults.

Fixed.
The only difference between some doggy shitcoin and LINK is the latter pretends not to be a worthless shitcoin by buying celebrity endorsements like Tim Cook and paying to participate in software conferences that always begin and end in mere words.

[Anonymous No.55607602]

>>55607538
No one pays for oracle services. Chainlink has literally zero dollars of revenue from their alleged software services.

Chainlink's only source of revenue have been sales of their 650 million tokens in the spot markets.

[Anonymous No.55607614]

>>55607573
It probably is, but think of it from the perspective of someone who profits off MEV. Right now, you make virtually unlimited profits because you’re the only serious game in town. Once real players get onboarded and money starts flowing in different directions, you lose that, because the people utilizing ETH now are only doing so out of a lack of better options. You can hedge by investing in link, but the profits will never compare to what is effectively risk free money via MEV.

[Anonymous No.55607629]

>>55607614
>They still live in the fictional universe of ETH and the shitcoin ecosystem having any sort of purpose beyond launching new shitcoins, crappy DEXs and "guaranteed" interest Ponzi schemes like Celsius.

My sides. When do you kiddies grow up?

[Anonymous No.55607639]

how long are you going to talk to yourself?

[Anonymous No.55607653]

>>55607639
I want you to know that no one is going to be buying your bags for the numerous reasons I've laid out.

[Anonymous No.55607658]

>>55607653
you can't buy what is not sold. also you're avoiding my question

[Anonymous No.55607674]

>>55607658
I will ensure that you won't recruit new idiots to cover your break-even shitcoin purchase price.

[Anonymous No.55607681]

>>55607674
i never shilled. you never answered my question.

[Anonymous No.55607690]

strange coincidence that all the other anons you've been talking to quit posting the second you started replying to me. you still haven't answered my question anon

[Anonymous No.55607705]

>>55607690
I assure you I am not him, I started ignoring his posts like 15 posts ago because he got boring.

[Anonymous No.55607716]

>>55607705
>phone poster
>3 posts since "your" last reply to "him"
>still monitoring thread to chime in to prove me wrong despite having lost interest

you still haven't answered my question anon

[Anonymous No.55607723]

>>55607681
You shitcoiners shill 24/7.
Just like homosexuals, you cannot reproduce naturally, so you need to recruit to keep your numbers intact.
I have come to destroy you.

[Anonymous No.55607747]

>>55607723
>projecting

you never answered my question anon

[Anonymous No.55607751]

>>55607723
Kek Shwabies

[Anonymous No.55607766]

>>55607747
You have no questions.

>>55607751
>Muh Q-tier folklore
How cute.

Remember that time Chainlink dumped over 140 million LINK ($840 million) in 2022 alone?
I guess the token does have a purpose after all.

[Anonymous No.55607769]

>>55607576
>websites are merely competing for money that flows into AOL, like the parasitic bottom feeders they are
That's your 1999 strategy

[Anonymous No.55607784]

>>55607769
If we're drawing analogies from the Dotcom days, it would be more accurate to say that Chainlink is the Flooz.com of shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.55607877]

>>55607527
This is basically the answer. The difference between Chainlink and its enemies within crypto is that the former wants to connect blockchains to legacy systems and the latter is an unhinged purity cult that wants to replace legacy systems all together. You can think of them as decentralization maxis.

[Anonymous No.55607906]

>>55606888
Use your brain. Look how many posts link threads get then compare that to typical shitcoin threads, that alone should jingle some bells in your head

[Anonymous No.55607935]

>>55606781
Every shitcoin dumps? Nah, not happening anon. Look for the ones that bring real-world applications, like Peaq. It's revolutionizing the economy of things and ain't playing around. Forget about memecoins.

[Anonymous No.55607971]

>>55607448
>Bankless refuses to mention Chainlink by name. Vitalik refuses to mention Chainlink by name
Is this FUD? You have to pay these guys to mention your shitcoin anon they're basically mouths for hire. You can't just go for a run with them and expect free marketing lol

[Anonymous No.55608070]

Hey guys, I think it's really important to know, so much that I'll post it in every thread, that I HATE chainlink and so should you.

[Anonymous No.55608346]

>>55607152
dig it out and please show us. Link was never $39 in 2019 retard.

[Anonymous No.55608350]

>>55608346
Not so many spots left /biz/ bros.

Unfortunately, not all of us are going to make it.

That's the harsh truth about crypto.

24/50, and it's getting narrower every hour.

I'll pull the plug on the bot at 50 WL.

That's when the magic happens.

Join @pepeforkwhitelistbot (Telegram bot) for Wl

Website: pepefork.vip

Community telegram: @pepeforketh

[Anonymous No.55608372]

>>55606781
Are we pumping boys?

[Anonymous No.55608417]

>>55607576
>They [swift] are not [going to use Chainlink].
Why are they lying to people then? Perhaps you're not up to speed here but they've dome out and explicitly stated that Chainlink and themselves are, and have been for some time, working in tandem to create the upgrade to Swift that they and their ten thousand banks will use. This isn't some gay shady breadcrumb, it's out there in both text and on video, multiple times. You can read about it on the forbes website or other similar websites. There's no secret here, it's not some shadowy thing.
If what you say it true then they're simply lying for some reason. Why?

[Anonymous No.55609227]

>>55607448
>Bankless refuses to mention Chainlink by name.

I don't understand this. I post a bunch of Chainlink comments on their Twitter posts and Ryan followed me. They interviewed CLG when they first started out and tried to get Sergey on the podcast.

When Chainlink takes off, I really want to press those guys on how much link they have staked or own. Cause this is flat out disgusting that they're supposed to be journalists for the people yet they were mum over the biggest project in existence.

[Anonymous No.55609256]

>>55606781
kek, I'm afraid LINK may not see a significant surge till the next bitcoin halvening. I joined the DePIN trend after learning that PEAQ had integrated Brainstem into their ecosystem and that I could now profit from my health data.

[Anonymous No.55609261]

So many seething linkies in this thread. Biz is generally infested with your likes however for the few people still active on here right now ask yourself this - What would have happened if in 2020 you transitioned from link to a split of avax,sol,luna,eth?
See how much that would've resulted in at the end of the last cylce - 11 Nov 2021
You will all realize how much time and energy you've wasted being married to this bag.

[Anonymous No.55609301]

>>55606813
Anon, I'm watching with bated breath. Normies are busy owning a portion of Tesla on Eloop and profiting from their made revenue, while you are here anticipating the unexpected on the biz. I piety you, Anon.

[Anonymous No.55609315]

>>55609261
>If you owned a different coin that went up in value more than the one you held over a specific period of time you would have made more money
Got a source for this claim?

[Anonymous No.55609336]

>>55606888
Correct, you shouldn't buy it. Personally I'm all in

[Anonymous No.55609365]

>>55609261
Hahaha I'm just not going to sell at these prices, nigger. I sold some between $30-45 to live comfily for long enough.
Just not selling, only staking. How does it make you feel, niggeR?

[Anonymous No.55610389]

>>55607527
sounds about right

[Anonymous No.55610405]

>>55607877
no they just want to become what legacy systems have turned into. look how how fucking sinister their mev skimming is. they don't hate the banks. they hate the fact that they can't do the same. there's a reason they fucking despise ari and sergey for calling them out on their bullshit and actually pushing for transparency and fairness.

[Anonymous No.55610409]

>>55606803
>if that’s were true

[Anonymous No.55610460]

>>55606781
Based knower
Link just broke out
25% dominance is coming

[Anonymous No.55610494]

>>55606888
You really shouldn't. There's tons of bag holders around the $50 range. It won't even get back there due to the sell pressure of people getting a 50% of their bag back.

[Anonymous No.55610515]

>>55610494
If an individual held from $50 to under $5 I highly doubt they're going to sell at any price, let alone half of ath.
Even if that was the case those hypothetical retards wouldn't hold the price down for long
L2fud

[Anonymous No.55610528]

>>55610494
Hey faggot, we know you hold XRP. You know how many bag holders are holding $4 XRP? Top kek a lot more than $50 Linkies.

[Anonymous No.55610571]

>>55610515
Shush, you're spoiling his 5 rupee fud post. Let's just pretend that every diamond handed link holder is desperate to sell on the way back up, when ccip, staking and huge movements with the likes of Swift and DTCC are imminent.
I for one have waited 6 years for such a sane trade.

[Anonymous No.55610593]

>>55610494
>there's tons of bag holders at a range that was held for a microscopic amount of time with no volume
The fud just keeps getting more and more bullish

[Anonymous No.55610605]

>>55606885
2019??

[Anonymous No.55610663]

>>55607614
Thank God. I was reading through these comments waiting to see if someone would even mention MEV. How retarded do you have to be to recognize that a certain faction despises chainlink but not mention MEV. This is a major hangup for tradfi. You think Chase and JPM would use a system where they could get sandwhiched?

[Anonymous No.55612005]

>>55610571
Are you me? Bought 25,000 Link at 35p - couldn't care less what happens between then and the inevitable moon into 3 figures.

[Anonymous No.55612432]

>>55606888
Link will be 1000 dollars eoy

[Anonymous No.55612509]

>>55606925
Lmao that fucking google partnership… some fucking faggot dev makes a blog post about using link in some retard baby side project and it become “google partnered with link!”

[Anonymous No.55612513]

Point of order, Tom Hanks is a pedophile.

[Anonymous No.55612724]

>>55606781
KEK
>dump all LINK
>buy RAIL.

[Anonymous No.55613006]

>>55612724
Shut the fuck up currynigger, stop spamming every thread with this shit. no one is buying your scam.

[Anonymous No.55613237]

>>55612509
Damn! Google partnered with LINK??

This is huge what solution is Link offering to google though?

[Anonymous No.55613315]

>>55606781
Link is an erc20 token

[Anonymous No.55613335]

>>55607448
4) non-retail investors know that as soon as the price goes up, the company dumps tokens on the market

[Anonymous No.55613375]

>>55610663
instead they are going to use a SEV chain, where sergey extracts all value?

[Anonymous No.55613407]

>>55607385
I have 9 wallets but I don't fud Link. I really don't see the point. It's spiritually bankrupt. It's a shame about the fud but it made sure I never sold, I suppose.

[Anonymous No.55613591]

>>55607358
>those who failed to sell above $30.
Like you? Because you claimed to have sold in 2019. The best you could have done is sell at $4.50.

[Anonymous No.55613667]

>>55606781
Lmao culties daydreaming about "sucking" something. Pretty fitting

[Anonymous No.55613687]

Is 15k link enough to make it? Feels like it never enough.

[Anonymous No.55613884]

>>55613237
>Damn! Google partnered with LINK??
Traditional players partnering with Crypto projects is the order of the day, we saw Polygon patner with Coca cola as well.

[Anonymous No.55613896]

>>55613687
Yes imo

[Anonymous No.55613905]

>>55613687
i dunno. was 1500 eth enough?

[Anonymous No.55613966]

>>55606781
you been saying this for six years lol

[Anonymous No.55613985]

>>55607576
Please stop making these embarrassing posts..

[Anonymous No.55614019]

>>55613884
>we saw Polygon patner with Coca cola as well.
Big one for Polygon i must say, another one that caught my attention was VISA partnership with CryptMi.

[Anonymous No.55614079]

>>55614019
Kill yourself currynigger

[Anonymous No.55614353]

>>55606781
You'll just suck up Sirgay's dumps
That said, I also own 100 Link

[Anonymous No.55614462]

>>55609261
I'm married to my LINK, but it's the surest investment I can make, my understanding of it is my edge, I honestly don't see the point in the stock market, it looks like a scam to me compared to LINK because they never pay dividends and other than that I'm just hoping I'll offload to someone else at a higher price when they come to do the same to another generation.

LINK is unironically my retirement strategy, I've never stopped buying every month, I've never contributed to a normie retirement plan

[Anonymous No.55615561]

burp

[Anonymous No.55615875]

>>55614462
exact same strategy here. let's hope it works out for us brother

[Anonymous No.55616543]

>>55613315
Erc-667 actually dear sweaty