[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 829 KB, 1767x1693, stake.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55503902 No.55503902 [Reply] [Original]

>8.25%
Staking chads, we just keep winning.

>> No.55503909

>>55503902
how many of these build programs don't consist of illegal securities? honest question.

>> No.55503911

>>55503902
>since u diamond handed link from the top to the bottom, youve earned vip access to buy another coin

>> No.55503917

>>55503909
Not sure, but who cares? Most of the top 20 coins were deemed securities and they're doing just fine.

>>55503911
Feels good man.

>> No.55503920

>>55503902
>being excited over a promised airdrop (LMAO) that’ll most likely be worth ~$200

I didn’t think dunking further on linkies was possible but here we are. Fucking pathetic.

>> No.55503924

>>55503920
You don't get it, Anon. We staked for the LINK rewards, anything else is a bonus. So far there's like 40 projects that's ~$8K of free money.

>> No.55503943

>>55503920
200x42= $8400 per staked 7k wallet
average price of 7k link at stake ~$56k
8400/56000 = 15%
plus 4.75% more stinks

>> No.55504127

hard to know when link goes again but it will
maybe first build airdrops are the trigger
also buy some sdl, new tokenomics change whole picture, rank 1800

>> No.55504228

all these low yields from staking assets with a shaky long-term value proposition are exciting nobody.
even ethereum went from new paradigm to only worth staking with a centralized entity like lido or you wont even get the mev which makes up half the returns now.

the allure of crypto has been growth through an expanding market. when you have to start talking about yield it means you've tapped out.

>> No.55504235
File: 36 KB, 466x492, 1508890330933.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55504235

>>55504228
isn't 42 new tokens as part of the build program expanding market? Will atleast one of them onboard market?

>> No.55504283

Americans dont qualify for build rewards lmao

>> No.55504290

>>55504235
just looks like scrambling for markets to me. most alts from the same era as chainlink are running into the same problems, no new inflows of capital.

>> No.55504300

GM based kings woke up bullish

>> No.55504328

>>55504290
wow genius almost like we're in a bear market and with heavy regulatory scrutiny on top
also which current era projects are doing better?
none
we need bigger players at this point and regulation
i wonder what the swift play is all about

>> No.55504400

>>55504328
big players and regulation will literally cut the chainlink middleman out of the entire equation. who do you think people are going to trust more, some ico startup with nothing on the line vs an established entity with a reputation?

chainlink is still a fully trusted system with stacks of premined coins and multisigs in control of everything. the last thing they need is regulation or scrutiny because they wont survive it.

>> No.55504431

>>55504400
I trust you more than I trust Swift and all the banks that want to use Chainlink. I think the banks have zero lobbying power and you're right Chainlink will just be consigned to the bin and we'll go back to sending digital smoke signals around the internet because that's how the system rolls. ALso, America the great leader calls the shots and won't allow chainlink to succeed. Also they'll ban the BRICS nations from launching a gold backed currency which would consign the worthless USD to the dustbin of history. America, fuck yeah.
kek

>> No.55504449

>>55504400
>vs an established entity with a reputation
we are in 2018 again
it's all so tiresome

>> No.55504526

>>55503909
Can you not pay people in securities? This isn't chainlink selling unregistered securities to people for an expectation of profit under Howey - even if these securities are themselves unregistered securities. They're remunerating stakers and other service providers through payment.

>> No.55504530

>>55503902
so how much build tokens did you got so far?
none?
we just keep winning though lol

>> No.55504531

>>55504449
>b-b-but everything has been foretold by the 2018 breadcrumbs!
it's been 5 years since then, touch grass

>> No.55504578

>>55504531
>can't even respond to the post in context
this example reminds me that there's a few literal bots that fud link on here in addition to brown people that barely understand English

>> No.55504609
File: 398 KB, 640x356, 1686197057733549.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55504609

the same arguments repeated OVER and OVER and OVER again

how are you guys not just tired of discussing Chainlink yet? I don't care about the profit, or the loss, whatever. That's all your own business. What I mean is, how the fuck are you not sick in your souls yet of discussing this garbage? Surely all the fun has been sucked out? Don't you have better things to do? Talking to both sides here.

>> No.55504615

>TOKENS FOR MORE TOKENS!!!!
fucking lolcows

>> No.55504800

>>55503920
Pool's closed faggot. You will NEVER stake.

You can still keep seething and foxgraping kek

>> No.55504804

>>55503902
nice inflation

>> No.55504823

>>55504578
>Pls respond, pls argue with me!
but I thought it has been deboonked since 2018??
lmao, get fucked, shill

>> No.55504901

>>55503920
Build rewards are more likely to be $500+ per project if you staked the maximum amount. Each project will be vying for our attention. Some will drop more. Some projects will moon hard. They want us to use and promote their platforms. There are very few comparable communities to OG linkies.
We're already looking at $21k minimum on top of staking rewards
OG linkies have big balances and participate in multiple defi projects, it's a guaranteed way for a build partner to kickstart their community and project.

Just think about how much these sorts of businesses would spend (per user) to acquire knowledgeable, wealthy and influential users.

>> No.55505259

>>55504526
yea this is why i asked. if some of these build affiliates are considered securities that may or may not be registered, i doubt stakers would be given any of the rewards. seems like too much of a liability on cll's part.

>> No.55505323

42 * 5% * 0

>> No.55505345
File: 218 KB, 470x470, gerbert_wild_dance_2_crop.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55505345

>>55503902
Time for us Linkies for celebrate. Everybody dance

>> No.55505366

when will we see the top dollar

>> No.55506075

>>55503943
Dude you dont actually think these are the real numbers do you?? Holy shit the delusion…

Sergey could take a literal shit on your face and youd be talking about all the great nutrients

>> No.55506091

>>55504901
>some projects will moon


Hahahahahhaha, what a far cry from the $1k eoy days. The cult is now awaiting a shitcoin airdrop which then needs to 100x. Wow

>> No.55506094

>>55506075
$200 average per BUILD partner for every 7k staked doesn't seem that delusional to me

>> No.55506140

>>55506091
pathetic linkniggers need to kill themselves already

>> No.55506303

>>55503902
Is Chainlink pulling a RedHat? Making customers pay for support and feature development focus?
Why are they taking a flat amount of the circulating supply instead of some sort of reccuring model?
What's stopping a Microsoft from acquiring them in the future?