Can we be serious here for a minute?

[Anonymous No.55400911]

Is Chainlink a good investment or not?

[Anonymous No.55400912]

No.

[Anonymous No.55400917]

>>55400911
Yes, then no. Currently yes again.

[Anonymous No.55400921]

>>55400911
Yes

[Anonymous No.55400945]

>>55400911
No, but sometimes yes

[Anonymous No.55400948]

>>55400911
How should you measure performance? In usd or sats?

Figure out what drives crypto valuations. Is it the undelivered promises of something the protocol will do, or hype surrounding people wanting to get rich?

Look at other alt coin charts. How many runs against bitcoin do they all get before starting to fade forever?

How's the chart looking now for a snapshot of whether there's likely to be a major hype driven move against bitcoin in the future? Are there any factors like majority token holders currently dumping or promising to do so in the future?

[Anonymous No.55400950]

>>55400948
>How should you measure performance? In usd or sats?
Since sats are measured in USD, the question is moot.

[Anonymous No.55400963]

>>55400948
Sats schizo is here. Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.55400983]

>>55400950
All crypto currency is ultimately denominated in sats. It's the prime chuck e cheese token in this casino.

What happens when btc is going up in usd, and your asset is going up in usd, but your asset is going down in sats?

Crypto is tricky. Measuring usd value of alts can easily obfuscate actual loss of value, despite appearing to be moving upwards. Teams, whales, exchanges, and bots instantly recognized that they can still dump tokens they minted for free on you while letting your alt move up a fractional amount of a btc upward move.

The slow bleed moves $100's of millions to their asset column, while temporarily making you feel like a winner so you stay in the game. When btc corrects, you see much lower lows.

[Anonymous No.55400992]

>>55400983
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.55400996]

>>55400911
At this price, sure.

[Anonymous No.55400997]

>>55400983
>All crypto currency is ultimately denominated in sats
It's not. For instance, ICOs were nearly all denominated in ETH or whatever.
And sats are denominated in USD.

You literally cannot buy a single thing with Bitcoin (including other cryptos) without adhering to Bitcoin's USD price.

[Anonymous No.55400998]

>>55400948
>What drives crypto valuations.

Hot air and speculation.

[Anonymous No.55401009]

>>55400992
Here's a chart that demonstrates.

The usd value of link has fluctuated a bit ytd, but has remained in essentially the same channel; however, it's value in sats, the underlying asset the powers the entire game, has neatly been cut in half.

You keep holding, because "who cares about +/- 10% in the grand scheme?", but in actuality you've been robed at a pace that makes federal reserve inflation blush.

[Anonymous No.55401013]

>>55401009
>however, it's value in sats, the underlying asset the powers the entire game, has neatly been cut in half.
All that means is Bitcoin did better.
You can do the exact same comparison with literally any asset under the sun.

[Anonymous No.55401016]

It's pretty bad

[Anonymous No.55401017]

>>55400997
Yes, and eths ico was denominated in btc. I could show the same smoke and mirrors game being run with eth. Eth has a unique property however: token needed, so it stays afloat much longer while true value is being siphoned off.

[Anonymous No.55401022]

>>55401009
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.55401030]

>>55401013
Even if I were to agree with your assessment that the chart only demonstrates
>btc did better
All 7000 charts in crypto show, post peak in sats, btc does better-- FOREVER, wouldn't that indicate the expectation of financial holding a post peak in sats asset are very grim?

[Anonymous No.55401042]

>>55400911
>investment
That's not quite the right word for it.
We all know it will never amount to anything.
You're supposed to buy and then find someone willing to hold your bags at a higher price.
Just spread FUD everywhere to lower the price, then buy, and then spread FOMO to raise the price.

[Anonymous No.55401044]

>>55401030
>>55401030
You literally cannot buy a single thing from anyone using BTC without having to look at its USD price.
Even if you found the most hardcore Bitcoin maxi in the universe, any transaction you make with him will be 100% based on Bitcoin's USD Price.

>Eth has a unique property however: token needed
Doesn't save ETH from dumping into the abyss even while gas fees absolutely moon.

[Anonymous No.55401051]

>>55400911
good for 3+ years perspective
bad for shorter term
so if you're thinking about your retirement, go for it. if you want quick bucks, go for the shitcoin casino

[Anonymous No.55401055]

>>55401030
>All 7000 charts in crypto show, post peak in sats, btc does better-- FOREVER
holy shit you're right. if something never happened before that means it will never happen. i forgot that everything that ever happened already happened at one point.

[Anonymous No.55401060]

>>55401030
>post peak in sats, btc does better
You're a retarded moron.

Tons of alts peak in sats, then peak again, and again, and again, ....
Obviously after the last peak BTC ends up doing better, but that's 100% hindsight.

[Anonymous No.55401076]

>>55401030
>>55401060
Plus, even if you were right (which you aren't) you're basically saying "investments are denominated in whatever performs best long term".
Which is the dumbest thing imaginable.

[Anonymous No.55401080]

>>55401044
Crypto is a segregated economic system that uses btc as the base reserve currency. Entry into that system can be done with other assets, even barter for real world goods and services if you like, but once you're in that system, everything is ultimately denominated in sats. At least for the people who are making actual gains against the inflated usd.

I don't know what you guys are doing. Losing sats is just the beginning of where your misallocating your capital. You're losing real usd both to inflation and listed asset value, as teams, whales, exchanges, and bots peel free btc off of you year after year.

Kek. Captcha. Is that fag still around here?

[Anonymous No.55401085]

>>55401080
>Crypto is a segregated economic system that uses btc as the base reserve currency
How is it segregated when BTC itself is denominated in USD?

[Anonymous No.55401089]

>>55401060
Only one has ever had 2 parabolic runs against sats. Dogecoin. Ask Elon to help you guys out by making Link the currency of Mars, and maybe you can have that too.

[Anonymous No.55401094]

everyone itt needs to kill themselves

[Anonymous No.55401095]

>>55401085
Willful misunderstanding of how crypto works won't bend reality and make your token moon a second time. You may fool a few people reading along who WANT to believe what you're saying, but the fundamentals of the system move forward without consideration of your feelings.

[Anonymous No.55401096]

>>55401089
>Only one has ever had 2 parabolic runs against sats
Nearly every alt out there has made successive new highs against BTC.

[Anonymous No.55401100]

>>55401095
>misunderstanding of how crypto works
You literally cannot buy anything at all with BTC without adhering 100% to its fiat price.

[Anonymous No.55401106]

>>55401096
>Nearly every alt out there has made successive new highs against BTC
Really?

[Anonymous No.55401116]

>>55401100
I was literally you once. In a cycles time, you'll either be out of crypto, or lecturing altcoin holders about how this all actually works.

I ain't even mad. I made all the same arguments. I did wake up and THANKFULLY take profits, but you move forward with the realization that alts exist to give me free bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.55401145]

>>55401106
You name a random alt.

>>55401116
>alts exist to give me free bitcoin
And Bitcoin exists to give you free wealth, aka fiat.

[Anonymous No.55401146]

>>55400911
Depends on when. For now, I prefer those I can earn from like AstraDAO which has both staking and index functionalities. Think on it.

[Anonymous No.55401166]

>>55401106
Your pic shows a ton of coins reaching new peaks.
You’re dumb.

Also,
>Amazon beat most of the stock market during the past ~23 years
>that means stocks are denominated in Amazon stock
This is you

[Sage No.55401195]

>>55401009
BTC is measured in USD you schizo retard rofl

[Anonymous No.55401212]

>>55401145
>>55401166
I can't stop you guys from losing money.

Final point:
You're last remaining argument
>link hasn't peaked in sats yet
OK, theoretically, you could be correct. It's unlikely. Here's why.

Thus far, link peaked in sats in 2020, and took a never ending shit thereafter.

Well, valuation in crypto is driven by hype. The hype peak for link (so far?)was the foothills of the 20-21 bullrun. It fell flat during the actual crypto hype mania of the bullrun. If the hype sentiment was non- existent or negative during the period where grandmothers were hyped about crypto, and it continued to bleed in sats, where is the future hype going to be coming from when new products to be excited about launch constantly and everyone is aware of link and already at best ambivalent towards it?

A hype train already came and went, it's undeniable, and for all other alts but one, there's only one hype train; moreover, link fell flat during peak mania, losing sats while even 2013 deadcoins reached previous usd ath's. I need someone to explain to me where exactly they expect the new hype generating a new sats ath will be coming from.

[Anonymous No.55401227]

>>55401212
>I can't stop you guys from losing money.
You could be 100% right that Bitcoin is the absolute best hold in crypto, and you'd still be wrong about cryptos being denominated in sats.

>I need someone to explain to me where exactly they expect the new hype generating a new sats ath will be coming from.
Don't worry about it.

[Anonymous No.55401236]

>>55401227
>Don't worry about it.
So
>breadcrumbs and technology test tweets
I want you guys to make it, because you deserve wealth far more than the people who already have it, so I hope I'm dead wrong about everything. Good luck. I'll just keep posing my charts and shit, because I don't want to see newfags getting hustled by "for the tech" fever dreams as we head into the next cycle.

[Anonymous No.55401250]

>>55400911
It's over bros, LINK is not new tech, a hidden gem, or a coming 10-100x. LINK is mainstream and is in Twitter roasties bios. It’s a corporate entity now, so Sergey has to dump another 750k LINK to hire talent managers and diversity officers. LINK hasn’t been the biz token for over 2 years now. Just sell anons... i-i-iit’s over. It was a good ride marines.

[Anonymous No.55401252]

>>55401227
>you'd still be wrong about cryptos being denominated in sats.
Check this out.

If I short link using btc as the base, and link goes up slightly in usd or remains flat, but goes down in sats (say by almost half year to date), what happens to my networth?

BIG THINK. Hmmm

[Anonymous No.55401261]

>>55401252
Shorting one coin against another doesn't change the fact that both are denominated in USD lol

[Anonymous No.55401284]

>>55401261
Semantics. In my scenario above, I minted almost half a free bitcoin. This is possible because you can short using btc as a base. Btc will always appreciate at least on parity with an alt post peak in sats; consequently, negating any risk of liquidation, and given the mechanics of crypto (partly driven by what in describing), the alt will always bleed sats. This leads to a free btc feedback loop, and with btc likely appreciating in usd, it becomes a free usd feedback loop. There's no need for hope, or breadcrumbs, or shilling. It's driven by gravity.

[Anonymous No.55401289]

>>55401284
>BTC goes up more than alts
>therefore alts are denominated in BTC

wow

[Anonymous No.55401311]

>>55401289
Did you even read? People are printing btc, and consequently, usd on your asset with zero risk regardless of its financial performance. They make money shorting link even if it does hits a new ath multiple in usd. They would even make more money than you.

[Anonymous No.55401328]

Anyways, I hope the 5 actual humans that use this board, and aren't compensated cll advocates learned something, or least decided they want to learn something.

That's my TedTalk.

[Anonymous No.55401343]

>>55400911
Ask yourself, “is token needed?”

[Anonymous No.55401352]

>>55400911
Could be a good investment but i am definitely not putting my money into it considering there are so much bagholders who are so eager to dump their bags after any slight pump.

[Anonymous No.55401356]

>>55401343
The mind fuck at the bottom of the rabbit hole is: needed tokens don't perform any better. Needed is a red herring. Crypto is a hype driven cash grab. Chainlink could partner with oxygen, and shorts will continue to print.

[Anonymous No.55401361]

>>55400997
btc blockspace is entirely denominated in sats

[Anonymous No.55401435]

>>55401352
New coins will always outperform the OGs thought that was a fact.

[Anonymous No.55401458]

>>55401435
It's an axiom guarded by the mechanics of wealth generation in crypto itself. Cexes, and dexes exist for this purpose. Defi, powered by chainlink, exists to facilitate the true value bleed of chainlink and other alts. A fatal irony.

[Anonymous No.55401460]

>>55401009
>>/biz/image/mlIQ2ZuosR95nm/IfMjq4A

>20 posts by this fuddie

[Anonymous No.55401464]

>>55401435
This is where my focus lies, which is getting into utility tokens which are not known for having so much bagholders a few of my favorite gems include RDNT, GRAIL and SPOOL.

[Anonymous No.55401496]

>>55401460
I'm dropping alpha neuron bombs up and down the thread, and your focus is (xxpbtid); meanwhile, you've likely posted more than me and airplane mode every few posts to spoof organic positive sentiment.

Eventually, the sec will consider this a securities law violation in crypto like it is in all other asset classes. Better hope they don't prosecute retroactively...

[Anonymous No.55401528]

>>55401311
>selling an asset for another is "printing" the latter asset

You belong in a legit mental institution.

[Anonymous No.55401536]

>>55400911
I'm buying every LINK I can up to ~$10/LINK.
Currently hold 15,000

[Anonymous No.55401542]

>>55401528
You've lost all arguments itt. I'm not trying to beat you; I'm just stating my case for the answer to:
>is this a good investment

You can call me crazy, deny math, call the chart fud, ignore how crypto markets have operated since inception, but it won't put a dollar in your pocket without significant upward motion of btc and extreme risk, while others are exposed to zero risk and profit from the existence of your asset regardless of usd appreciation or decline. In fact, the longer and more you hold, the greater their long term profits become.

[Anonymous No.55401549]

>>55401542
>I'm just stating my case for the answer to:
>>is this a good investment

Being the better investment does not mean other investments are denominated in it.

[Anonymous No.55401557]

>>55400911
Yes. The fundamentals are insane.

[Anonymous No.55401566]

>>55400911
yes

[Anonymous No.55401573]

Chainlink dumped 90%

I went long at $6 after -90% dump

It then dumped 20% in 5 hours down to $4.7 and liquidated me

This is a shitcoin that only use is to pull in liquidity to liquidate people

Imagine bitcoin crashing 90% and then you go long and it dumps another 20% - yeh never happens

[Anonymous No.55401608]

>>55401536
I'm in the same boat, I'm also throwing in some ORE too. That mCap is straight-up mind-blowing, And guess what? Their V2 just dropped, with some sicky utilities, man. It's better to buckle up 'cause this ride's about to get wild

[Anonymous No.55401611]

>>55401549
Oh my.
What would you call something all but guaranteed to lose value against the primary mover in an asset class that it can be directly traded, borrowed with, and leveraged by?
I'd be hesitant to even call that an investment.

If you want to play games with "what's crypto denominated in?", you do so at your own financial peril, and with a neat certainty of lose in actual usd and an absolute loss in usd adjusted for inflation.

You are choosing to lose true networth because Assblaster forgot to say, or deliberately omitted, when to sell/ short.

[Anonymous No.55401614]

>>55401611
>Bitcoin is all but guaranteed to keep outperforming Link
k
I never said anything to the contrary.

[Anonymous No.55401616]

>>55401536
You will make it

[Anonymous No.55401634]

>>55401614
Want to just call it an agree to disagree across the board? Nobody reading anything were writing is changing their minds based upon our astringent, that's just not how humans work. We're basically just masturbating publicly against each other. There's no real winners in a contest like that.

[Anonymous No.55401642]

>>55401634
>astringent
I'm not even sure what word I mistyped there. Perspectives maybe?

[Anonymous No.55401647]

>>55401642
Assessments most likely. Idk

[Anonymous No.55401648]

>>55401634
You said all cryptos are denominated in sats, and your argument for that is because Bitcoin will outperform them.
That's not how denominations work.

[Anonymous No.55401687]

>>55401648
Can link be traded for, borrowed with, and leveraged by btc?
Was the link ico in eth?
Was the eth ico in btc?
If onramps close, and usd is boxed out, does crypto cease to exist? If not, what primary asset keeps it afloat?
When alts, including eth, move up or down in usd, it's almost universally driven by what other asset?
Alts, with one exception, get a single run against what before fading towards zero?

Answer: well, if I asked you, you'd say because bitcoin can be bought with usd, the answer doesn't matter.

I hold a different position.

[Anonymous No.55401709]

>>55401687
Literally everything you can or cannot buy using BTC depends on its fiat value.

[Anonymous No.55401733]

>>55401608
What's special about the V2.0?

[Anonymous No.55401774]

>>55401709
Oh shit. You're right.
$1000eoy
My bad. What was I thinking? Screencap my acknowledgement of you winning please, so when I forget next thread, you can shut me down with the picture.

[Anonymous No.55401791]

>>55401774
You keep conflating the denomination argument and the performance argument.
It's insane.

[Anonymous No.55401800]

>>55401791
I was dead serious in my last post.
>unironically
If you will.
Cap the reply and use it to shut me up in the future. I was wrong.

[Anonymous No.55401820]

>>55400917
Already getting confused?Get ready for the Bitzing platform launching soon, fags are ready to dive in now for a chance to win a blue-chip NFT

[Anonymous No.55401829]

>>55401800
Even if you were dead serious, you're still conflating.

You don't have a single logical bone in your body.

[Anonymous No.55401844]

>>55401791
OK you're in a state of disbelief because my arguments were fucking awesome, but I discovered a fundamental flaw in my own reasoning. That's how prudence works.
Not going to disclose, because there's money to be made, but there's mathematical reason to assume link will buck the near universal altcoin trend. It has nothing to do with partnerships or tech, at least not directly.

[Anonymous No.55401906]

Welcome to kill yourself general

[Anonymous No.55401910]

>>55401829
When does the next staking round open and what is the announced vesting period? I'd prefer not to shift through medium articles for the answer.

[Anonymous No.55401912]

>>55400911
No but you take whatever gamble you like

[Anonymous No.55401991]

>>55401573
>liquidated me
Having a liquidation point was the fail here. wtf are you doing?
Does anyone else remember watching ETH go to $80 for a few seconds in March 2020 before going on to over $4000?

LINK has pretty bad liquidity. It can dump pretty hard. Stop being a degen with leverage. Earn more income so that you can buy a proper spot position that you can't be forcibly shaken out of with total loss.

[Anonymous No.55402085]

>>55401829
Did you stop replying because you're frantically trying to piece together my epiphany? If you answer this >>55401910, I'll drop another clue.

[Anonymous No.55402091]

>>55402085
Not that it matters, because as you guys say
>it's inevitable

[Anonymous No.55402106]

>>55402085
>>55401910
>>55401844
>>55401800
>>55401774
>>55401687
>>55401647
>>55401642
>>55401634
>>55401611
>>55401542
>>55401496
>>55401458
>>55401356
>>55401328
>>55401311
You will never be a real woman. You have no womb, you have no ovaries, you have no eggs. You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and surgery into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection. All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your ghoulish appearance behind closed doors. Men are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed men to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even trannies who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a man. Your bone structure is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk guy home with you, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your diseased, infected axe wound. You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight. Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you with a headstone marked with your birth name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a man is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a skeleton that is clearly male.

[Anonymous No.55402109]

>>55402106
K

[Anonymous No.55402110]

>>55401733
The V2.0 introduces a name service that allows users to claim unique readable names for their personas

[Anonymous No.55402117]

>>55402109

[Anonymous No.55402120]

>>55402117
Keep reading my posts friend. All the way down, or just skip to this one.
>>55401774

[Anonymous No.55402125]

>>55402120
Haven't read a single one. Anybody who has 1/3rd of the thread post count is bound to be a lifeless trannyniggerfaggot.

[Anonymous No.55402129]

>>55402125
K

[Anonymous No.55402133]

>>55402125
wew lad, you're on par with those "people" who see a long winded discussion between two autists and cries samefag. I'm shocked your posts don't have iphone file names.

[Anonymous No.55402149]

>>55402133
"...two auti-ACK!!!!"

[Sage No.55402153]

holy shit that schizo kike has argued semantics for 34 posts so far achieving nothing

[Anonymous No.55402168]

>>55402149
take your coal back to >>>/sharty/

[Anonymous No.55402171]

>>55402153
Can't read; never selling? Lol

[Anonymous No.55402208]

>>55402168

[Anonymous No.55402238]

god i love seeing a 35 pbtid derailer right at the start of a thread, filtering, and reading the ten posts that are left. hard to believe they even waste their time.

[Anonymous No.55402258]

>>55402238
As long as you buy and stake more chainlink, it was all worth it.

[Anonymous No.55402590]

>>55400911
Ask Redditors, Anon. DePIN is the best investment for oldfag like me, and Peaq's innovative idea is paving the way for the ideal setting to build DePINs.

[Anonymous No.55402635]

>>55401820
Faggot, I'd rather participate in the KREST sale on AllianceBlock Fundr and gain enormous rewards than join this sh*t for a JPEG caricature.

[Anonymous No.55402686]

in short: yes

[Anonymous No.55402967]

>>55402635
Not all JPEGs are shits, those with utility are unique, Ore Active NFT is exceptional

[Anonymous No.55403050]

>>55402258
Since those other faggots don’t care, tell me how I can profit from this.am I supposed to short using link/btc? I’m very stupid incase you didn’t know

[Anonymous No.55403636]

>>55402967
Look here fucktard, Bitzing's gamification makes collecting NFTs fun and rewarding, who'd let asian virgins go just to have bitches.

[Anonymous No.55403655]

>>55402635
You not ready to buy mystery boxes and get rewarded? Ngmi.

[Anonymous No.55403698]

>>55400911
this is a summary on chain link as seen on tokenmetrics, now do with that info whatever you want anon

[Anonymous No.55403707]

>>55402117
Fucking Sergey

[Anonymous No.55403716]

>>55402590
Only retards use reddit

>>55402967
I get to run a node with my seeker, bet that counts for utility right?

[Anonymous No.55403825]

>June 15, 2020
>LINK: $4.04
>QNT: $6.79
>ETH: $234
>BTC: $9419
>BNB: $16.83
>ADA: $0.07
>DOGE: $0.002
>SOL: $0.58

>June 15, 2023
>LINK: $5.27
>QNT: $98
>ETH: $1661
>BTC: $25475
>BNB: $236
>ADA: $0.26
>DOGE: $0.06
>SOL: $14.75

Terrible investment. Never fall for meme coins

[Anonymous No.55403830]

>>55400911
>Is Chainlink a good investment or not?
when were you in 2018?

[Anonymous No.55403962]

>>55403698
>"Moderately positive sentiment towards chain link"
hahah nobody is buying it anymore, moderately means it's stuck and never going up

[Anonymous No.55403984]

>>55403716
>I get to run a node with my seeker
If it isn't just sitting pretty in your mm as a random jpeg without use then yes, utility based nfts are taking over

[Anonymous No.55403989]

>>55403825
Fuck must be hell for link holders
Especially top buyers

[Anonymous No.55404180]

>>55403825
This just proves one thing, Link is a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.55404196]

>>55403984
How many of the top10 collections actually offer any utility though?

[Anonymous No.55404214]

>>55403989
Can't imagine being them

[Anonymous No.55404258]

>>55403698
This doesn't mean shit
And where did you get it generated from?

[Anonymous No.55404437]

>>55404180
The fact that Link jeets are living in denial about

[Anonymous No.55404451]

>>55403655
Take your mystery boxes and stick it in your ass

[Anonymous No.55404465]

>>55404258
It clearly says tokenmetrics bobo
Learn to read and comprehend, and you don't get such well analyzed breakdown anywhere else

[Anonymous No.55404482]

>>55404214
Because you're a low life

[Anonymous No.55404498]

>>55400911
Crypto is no longer a good investment, and Chainlink is far from the best crypto.

[Anonymous No.55404502]

>>55403716
I'm planning to set up a sylo node soon, just need to get my hands on an old PC I don't use and that's it

[Anonymous No.55405902]

>>55404498
Crypto is still a based investment retard, say that to fidelity and blackrock which are lobbying for bitcoin Etfs. The space is moving to an interesting phase and I'm accumulating promising AI alts like Fet, Peaq and Ocean in preparation.

[Anonymous No.55407396]

>>55400911
Its the bestest there is

[Anonymous No.55407930]

>>55400911
Anything that is heavily shilled (posters are paid to promote) is going nowhere price wise, but all the posts will say it will moon in 2 weeks, or a month.

> See XRP, Chainlink

[Anonymous No.55407946]

>>55400911
I'm like basically everyone in my cohort. CS degree (four years) + 240k starting average salary MINIMUM. I have more than enough money to play around with in middle class as my salary allows me to get an affordable home with play money on the side. With a four year CS degree, even from a state school, you're looking at 350-400k by your 30s. That's what I am doing and pretty much everyone else. Right I have the play money, consdiering my high TC, so yes I have some chainlink. We'll see where it goes.

[Anonymous No.55407955]

>it's down 88.34% from its all time high value
totally it will go to moon and beyond and none of it will matter just buy.

[Anonymous No.55408285]

>>55400911
ya its pretty good

[Anonymous No.55408323]

UH OH
S T I N K Y
T
I
N
K
Y

[Anonymous No.55410223]

>>55400963
>>55400992
Look up some stuff like portfolio theory, alpha and beta(in the finance context).
Just the most basic aspects...

[Anonymous No.55410896]

>>55404465
Yes, including Peaq Network, which is now holding a public sale for its Canary Chain.

[Anonymous No.55411075]

>>55400911
Sold my LINK for AI and DiD tokens, these narratives are booming ATM.

[Anonymous No.55411096]

>>55407396
But some memes are the real deal. When it comes to turning shitcoins to, give it to Eggman.

[Anonymous No.55411166]

>>55404498
Reason why I feel comfy with self custody based tokens.

[Anonymous No.55411224]

>>55404180
No worries jeet, I've got a way out. I use Eggpot to convert shitcoins to ETH. Problem solved!

[Anonymous No.55411241]

>>55411096
Memes are high risk shit. Don't want to be an exit liquidity for a highschool dropout shoving green dildos up his mancunt. Fucking sticking with new trends and altcoinistdao predictions LSD RWA are my picks

[Anonymous No.55413014]

>>55403636
Gamification with what rewards anon? I for one have seen decent utilities for NFTs and I'm anticipating the ones on Peaq which would give users access to machine services.

[Anonymous No.55413664]

>>55405902
>Crypto is still a based investment retard, say that to fidelity and blackrock which are lobbying for bitcoin Etfs
You prove me rigfht within your post. Crypto has become corrupt, so it is no longer a good investment.

[Anonymous No.55413886]

>Link USD price doesn't matter, only sats price

Bitcoin is going to zero. The USD has utility. Link has utility. Btc doesn't. The bitcoin whales are all waiting for Sergey (Satoshi) to dump his genesis wallet for link. Early bitcoin holders are currently dumping bitcoin for link. Bitcoin was nothing but a proof of concept, an experiment. Link was the original vision.