Chainlink (Ticker: LINK)

[Anonymous No.55322794]

After the new supply release roadmap, we need to decide on when to sell. Obviously, we're not selling now, right? For me, I think the second we hit $7 I'm out. Looking forward to hear from my fellow marines on this.

[Anonymous No.55322797]

>>55322794
I'm gonna sell some at $81,000.

[Anonymous No.55322861]

>>55322797
I might sell half my stack at $81,000 and then see where the rest goes

[Anonymous No.55322869]

>>55322794
i'll probably sell a couple hundred at $81,000

[Anonymous No.55322878]

>>55322797
>>55322861
>>55322869
Come on now. Post some realistic prices here

[Anonymous No.55322886]

>>55322878
$81,000

[Anonymous No.55322894]

>>55322797
>>55322861
>>55322869
>>55322886
holy shit what the fuck is gonna happen to the dollar to devalue it so much

[Anonymous No.55322912]

>>55322894
What's happening to it already?

[Anonymous No.55323065]

>>55322878
ok ok
$1000

[Anonymous No.55323462]

Also do you guys remember Wyckoff Anon. Lol.

[Anonymous No.55323729]

>>55322794
Gonna sell 10% at $1000, 40% at $81000

[Anonymous No.55323847]

>>55322794
I am making free money every day from staking. I have about 30 airdrops on their way later this year already and by the time we get there it’ll be 100+ and so my staking APY is somewhere around 200-300%. I’m honestly never selling. I can live off of that.

[Anonymous No.55323883]

>>55323847
>on their way later this year
i bought a plot on the moon, i will be able to live off of the rent. we did good anon, we are very smart business men

[Anonymous No.55323898]

>>55322794
Give me a quick rundown on what happened and what are the implications of it, keep in mind that I'm a brainlet

[Anonymous No.55323907]

>>55322878
I've heard that $81,000 is the consensus.

[Anonymous No.55323951]

>>55322794
I only have 100k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. Link is only going to $10 max. Right now I might make 500k before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 500K into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 50k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 50k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 5MM, but more likely 10MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link were about $80 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen.

[Anonymous No.55323971]

>>55322794
I’m selling when it gets to $150 in 2030

[Anonymous No.55324175]

>>55323898
It pretty much makes it impossible for the price to pump for at least another 5 years. We're going to be stuck in this $2-$9 for a while.

[Anonymous No.55324181]

>>55324175
>stuck in this $2-$9 for a while.
Glowingly optimistic...

[Anonymous No.55324194]

>>55322794
I might sell about 1k at $200, another 2k at $500, and then leave the other 17-ish k staked.

[Anonymous No.55324206]

>>55324181
Actual developments like CCIP and staking v0.2 will probably hold the price afloat against this enormous sell pressure.

[Anonymous No.55324233]

>>55324206
>probably
Well, I'm sold just bought 1 billion kanglinks.

[Anonymous No.55324245]

>>55324206
CCIP is actually going to be free for the big institutions

[Anonymous No.55324262]

100 million ChainLink has just been moved to the binance wallet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwDc_G5C8qs

[Anonymous No.55324268]

Can someone just be fucking honest about Chainlink? If I sold now I would still have 5x my initial investment, but it certainly won't be the set-for-life money I had hoped for.

[Anonymous No.55324282]

>>55324268
honestly speaking the chainlink tokenomics aren't designed for the price to pump, so if you're looking for a 10x within the next 5 years you're better off putting your money into something else. No-one investing into chainlink now will ever have set-for-life money and we will be lucky if the price ever reaches triple digits as the team are set on keeping it as low as possible for cheap enterprise use.

[Anonymous No.55324298]

>>55322886
>>55323065
>>55322861
Are these bots?

How is that realistic?
Are you saying link has what it takes to hit 1k? Molly shit.

[Anonymous No.55324325]

>>55324206
In what way will this affect the price? Where is the liquidity coming from to incentivize those who staked, and how is this achieved? Is there any approach for token support? These are the questions you should be asking. If you do know, I'm all ears. This is unlike tokenized RWAs like MNI Corp, which generated liquidity from commercial business.

I'd like to know the approach for this. I'm very conscious, smart, and careful with my decisions before investing in anything or participating in any program.

[Anonymous No.55324331]

>>55324298
I mean you can do some pretty simple calculations to estimate it. All you need is a bit of knowledge about quadratic staking and a few realistic estimates of the enabled transactional value. I'm not going to spoonfeed you with the answers though.

[Anonymous No.55324337]

>>55324331
cool buzzwords

[Anonymous No.55324412]

>>55324282
The price of the token doesnt impact how much it costs to use the network. Thinking that is 70 IQ material. Chainlink have engineered a bridge that Sergey is about to stand under while a 100 ton train goes overhead. Once he survives then that bridge will be used by everyone

[Anonymous No.55324421]

>>55324412
>The price of the token doesnt impact how much it costs to use the network
why buy it then?

[Anonymous No.55324467]

>>55324421
Do you think the token is supposed to go to 1000 dollars and then it costs 1000 dollars everytime someone wants a price update?

[Anonymous No.55324478]

>>55324421
>Fixed supply, 1 billion total tokens
> Pricing of services (CCIP, data feeds, PoR, VRF, DECO) can remain at a fixed price in US dollar terms over a given time period
> Over time, the network grows and demand for the services increases, and more Link gets staked as collateral to secure higher value contracts
> Larger portion of total supply gets locked up as stake and rising demand for Chainlink services applies upwards price pressure on the remaining Link that are freely circulating

[Anonymous No.55324510]

>>55324467
If the price is not affected by the network usage, why should I even care about the network?
>>55324478
>rising demand applies upwards price pressure
but that is simply not true, unless you want to tell me that nobody uses Chainlink right now

[Anonymous No.55324531]

>>55324510
>but that is simply not true, unless you want to tell me that nobody uses Chainlink right now
Correct, so far there has been no correlation between network usage and price, if anything as the network has been used more, the price has fallen, so we can expect it to do in future.

[Anonymous No.55324532]

>>55324510
I said network usage is not affected by the price not the other way round, pretty big difference. Ethereum gas costs are determined by demand for blockspace, not the token price for example... If it started out with Eth costing 50c and every transaction was 1 Eth do you think that would have been a good thing?

[Anonymous No.55324557]

>>55324532
cool, I still don't get why should it pump and what does "network" have to do with it whatsoever, if it can't pump after establishing a monopoly over the space and all that, whats the point?
>inb4 we're early wait 20 more years

[Anonymous No.55324577]

>>55324557
VCS SAID NO ONE MAKES IT IN CRYPTO ANYMORE SO MOON'S CANCELED GET IT THROUGH YOUR RETARD STRENGTH SKULL YOU FAGGOTS ARE TOO LOUD WHENEVER THEY PUMP IT UP SO THEY DUMP IT TO SILENCE YOU JUST LIKE THEY RAPE CHILDREN THEN PUT A COVID MASK ON YOU AND LOCKED YOU THE FUCK DOWN FOR YEARS FOR SPEAKING OUT STFU NEXT TIME LINK MOONS AND MAYBE YOU'LL MAKE IT

[Anonymous No.55324580]

>>55324557
>Fuddies in charge of reading comprehension

[Anonymous No.55324589]

>>55324580
>baggies in charge of damage control

[Anonymous No.55324590]

>>55324557
Its the same with everything else in crypto. Right now its heavily subsidized by token emmissions and not profitable, the price is just a speculation that one day it will be profitable and there will be no more need for token dumps. At that point between higher amounts of staking for collateral and higher demand for the token to pay for services then the actual supply and demand dynamics kick in and there will be real upward price pressure. Until then it's subject to the same crypto speculative cycles as everything else. I think Ethereum is the closest thing to actually being self sustaining and profitable now and it can still dump in a bear market

[Anonymous No.55324643]

>>55324590
thank you, I'll most likely stay away

[Anonymous No.55324681]

>>55324643
np, this chart shows how eth is still at least 90% subsidised by newly created tokens. On a very good day in this bear market the fees from network usage can pay for 10% of the cost of running the network, I can totally understand how thats not for everyone but it is the same with everything including bitcoin

[Anonymous No.55324702]

>>55324643
Think of the tagline for crypto as "If you build it they will come" we all crowdfund these things thinking that once they are up and running people will use them and they will be profitable

[Anonymous No.55324712]

>>55324681
yeah, I wouldn't touch ETH right now, either, have no clue what's going on with their network and I don't care either, but from a price perspective compared to BTC it is way overvalued, it is
quick question, if ETH still hasn't managed to become self sustained after all these years and after all the adoption and stuff, what is the bullish thesis for chainlink?
>>55324702
>If you build it they will come
the more you say, the more convinced I become this entire "industry" is a house of cards

[Anonymous No.55324748]

>>55324712
Bullish thesis for Link is partly speculative - its not even top 20 despite being at least the 3rd most important piece of infrastructure.. every blockchain has to use it so it can't go out of fashion. They've pretty much got everyones balls in a salad shooter so they can force people to pay higher prices when the need to and also they are right now being adopted by the biggest financial institutions in the world so could easily be handling the most transactional volume in all of crypto in a few years. I can't even fathom how that wouldn't result in at least a speculative pump even if it is still subsidized, which it may not be by then

[Anonymous No.55324766]

>>55324712
They have a pretty clear path to profitability between dozens of BUILD projects giving them 5% of their token supply, many blockchains choosing to cover their gas costs and then just plain users fees for services

[Anonymous No.55324772]

>>55322797
>>55322861
>>55322869
>>55322886
>>55323729
>Organic

[Anonymous No.55324843]

>>55324531
>if anything as the network has been used more, the price has fallen
This is a sorry truth that most Linkers haven't realised. In the short/medium-term, greater network usage means greater dumping? Why? Because everything is subsidized currently. So the more fees the more unlocks we will endure UNTIL the locked supply is depleted. Then we will finally have our pump. When will that be though? 7 years, Rory said it himself.

[Anonymous No.55325357]

>>55322794
SELL NOW AT $5
LET SERGEY DUMP HIS TOKENS UNTIL PRICE HITS $1
BUY 5x amount at $1

Bulletproof strategy because *THEY HAVE TO* marketdump their shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.55325520]

>>55324325
Aside from every tx on CCIP requiring LINK tokens similar to a gas fee, nodes will need collateral to process jobs. If jobs grow enough, that means nodes who want to expand their business need more LINK, so you get demand from both users and node operators. Price is just an output of demand and supply. The question is will demand grow more then 7% per year + whatever rate of supply comes from the retail market sell side? Nobody knows the answer to that, but it’s not hard to believe if CCIP really is the next generation of blockchain that it will outpace this handily.

[Anonymous No.55325773]

because blockchain users and retail never have to actually use the token, it becomes pretty useless in the mind of that crowd. It will never pump speculatively the way other tokens do during a bull market. No one cares that devs, banks (lol), or node operators actually need this token for the network. If your whole point is to make money during the next bull market, there are way better coins than link. What CL is building will literally take years and years before it's ready for real adoption and therefore can command higher marketcaps. Until CL team actually makes the token useful to the every day user, this is how it's going to be.

[Anonymous No.55326038]

>>55325773
The everyday user won't even know they're using it in most cases. The user's bank will just begin offering instant settlement on bank-to-bank transfers and the user will not know that it's CCIP moving stablecoins on the back-end.

[Anonymous No.55326051]

>>55326038
I this what will really happen?

[Anonymous No.55326288]

>>55324590
Doesnt quadratic staking kill the narrative that token lock up will appreciate price? Aren't we now hoping that nodes will have a staking arms race to prove reputation and ability to handle high value jobs with high collateral (i.e. your staked tokens forfeit to the client to pay for node operator fuck up)? It would be nice to know if the increased demand is all going to be subsidized through Sergey dumps and BUILD/SCALE or if it will actually come from OTC purchased tokens (unlikely). Id also like to know how much each transfer or call would theoretically cost SWIFT so we could estimate some things. Not that it will matter if they hand Sergey USD or USDC and he gives them Link from a team wallet or subsidy allocation. I hold a little over 2k. I still plan to get to 10k and stake a few k more past that. I think ill be able to buy most of that arp
Ound 1 dollar, maybe less. But I really think this isn't going anywhere. Im merely hedging a bet by still accumulating.

[Anonymous No.55326748]

>>55325520
I still feel this is dependent on market volatility. I will always prefer tokenized RWA and LSD to any form of staking. If the tx fee and collateral on nodes are not sufficient, the team will have no choice but to mint more into the ecosystem to incentivize users. I think this is where the 7% inflation comes in every year.

[Anonymous No.55326757]

>>55323951
Kek this

[Anonymous No.55326772]

>>55324331
Are you putting the MCAP into view when running your calculations? Mind you, this needs more demand to have such, and in a way, it will be more than the mcap of Bitcoin, which is unrealistic. link will never exceed more than 5x.

[Anonymous No.55326784]

>>55322794
Prob will let some go at $81,000 USD.

[Anonymous No.55326826]

>>55322794
what part of never selling don't you understand?

[Anonymous No.55326939]

>>55324206
staking v0.2 just releases more supply into the market because then the withdrawals open, and I think everybody who staked wants out at this point lmao

[Anonymous No.55327160]

Guys please answer honestly, when are you planning to sell? I want to sell before you do.

[Anonymous No.55327210]

>>55322794
Is this all you need? Why bother with research when LINK is pratically guuaranteed to go up? It can't be that easy..

[Anonymous No.55327245]

>>55327160
$9
act accordingly

[Anonymous No.55327293]

I cannot in good conscience support the latest chainlink dump announcement, the team already dumped a billion usd worth of tokens, they have enough money, I don't understand why they need more. Link investors keep getting the short end of the stick and it's sickening!

[Anonymous No.55327659]

>>55327210
I think so too. LINK is just too powerful

[Anonymous No.55327710]

>>55327210
>>55327659
Based schizo.

>>55327245
How many LINK holders do you think are willing to wait for it to hit $9 before selling? Me personally I'll stick to $7.

[Anonymous No.55327739]

>>55326051
Fednow is using Chainlink

[Anonymous No.55327752]

Why would i sell the best investment ever? I bought this shit when it was around 20 cents, and keep buying each week. What kind of complete retard would sell now? How many FUD thread are up about Link every single day? Who would spend their time fudding an investment like they do on biz? How many FUD threads do you see on biz about NEO, or ICP or TRON? Those were real scams. Where are the daily threads about the FUN token? Or Stellar token? Nobody comes to laugh at those bagholders. Nobody wants them to sell, nobody gives a hit about them. How many threads on biz do you see about DENT coin? Tierion? REN? REQ? ENJIN?

There's a reason these FUCKS fud Link. Don't be a stupid faggot and keep stacking Linkies. Oh, and for every shiteater that replies to this post i'll buy a 100 Links.

[Anonymous No.55327826]

>>55327752
>best investment ever
Best in what way? Certainly not price action.

>20 cents and keep buying
If you kept buying then your average is way up 20 cents. I see no reason you mention that unless it was your only purchase.

>FUD threads
It's disgruntled holders. No one is paying to FUD an illiquid rank 23 shitcoin. Absolutely not on this autistic website with shitty traffic.

>NEO ICP TRON
Like you said, these are literal scams so no one here unironically holds them.

>There's a reason these FUCKS fud Link
Because they were promised a good price action but it has performed horribly. Nothing else to it.

[Anonymous No.55327979]

>>55327752
>best investment
holy giga nuclear cope

>June 15, 2020
>LINK: $4.04
>QNT: $6.79
>ETH: $234
>BTC: $9419
>BNB: $16.83
>ADA: $0.07
>DOGE: $0.002
>SOL: $0.58

>June 15, 2023
>LINK: $5.27
>QNT: $98
>ETH: $1661
>BTC: $25475
>BNB: $236
>ADA: $0.26
>DOGE: $0.06
>SOL: $14.75

[Anonymous No.55328089]

>>55322878
I'd front run those fools and sell at $80,500

[Anonymous No.55328097]

>>55327710
It was 7 literally 2 weeks ago why didn't you just sell then?

[Anonymous No.55328839]

>>55322886
nice FUD

[Anonymous No.55329412]

>>55322794
once it hits 1000 im out

[Anonymous No.55329453]

chainlink is the most entertaining investment i have ever made

[Anonymous No.55329688]

which part of "never selling" did you not understand?

[Anonymous No.55329872]

>>55322794
>>55322878
>>55323462
>>55327160
>>55322894
>>55323883
>>55324175
>>55324206
>>55324282
>>55324531
>>55324181
>>55324233
>>55324245
>>55324262
>>55324268
>>55324298
>>55324325
>>55324325
>>55324337
>>55324421
>>55324510
>>55324557
>>55324643
>>55324712
>>55327979
>>55327710
>>55327826
hey uh sorry fudcucks... i know you're probably like 6 hours and several hundred posts into your shifts but... since you're so obsessed with my allegedly useless and bad investment i just wanted to drop by and say that im just not gonna sell
i know... ugh i KNOW
im actually going to buy more

[Anonymous No.55329898]

The thought of Sergey makes me smile legitimately. I love this fat man.

The dream of being right rather than buying nigger lambos and iced out overpriced Mountain jew watches keeps me going.

I come on here and read every single fud thread daily since early 2018 and I feel even better afterwards.

[Anonymous No.55330107]

>>55326051
DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE ITSTHHHH LE SEGREEEEEET!!!!’

[Anonymous No.55330116]

>>55322797
that will be the price of a cup of coffee

[Anonymous No.55330117]

>>55326288
This is what they refer to as the bargaining stage

>duuuuuuuuuuuuude, my shitcoin is needed, r r right??((

[Anonymous No.55330137]

>>55329872
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude itsthhhh a conssssthhhpirathyyyy!!!

>duuuuuuuuuuude i foughteded le fud by losing money, HODL marinesthhhh!!!!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHA. Cuck weakling I can feel the tears

[Anonymous No.55330147]

>>55322794
I'm mega dumping at $6, fuck LINK

[Anonymous No.55330544]

>>55330107
>>55330117
>>55330137
lmao look how triggered duuuudeposter is
sorry michael but your life is like this because you lost everything on ANS
im still going to buy more chainlink btw - that's the end result of all your efforts on here

[Anonymous No.55330979]

>>55330117
>guysh im a psychologhish
You have terminal OCD, duuuude

[Anonymous No.55331502]

>>55329898
based

[Anonymous No.55331515]

>>55322794
I'll sell a couple LINK at $81'000

>>55323898
Sergey dumping more LINK since the bear market is just about over.

[Anonymous No.55331656]

>>55329872
You are probably in loss that's why you ain't selling and want to lure others into pumping your bags so you can sell off. We understand the drill, pleb. Stop shitposting and giving an exaggerated projection of price that's unrealistic. Link Maxi, I hate you guys.

[Anonymous No.55331668]

>>55331656
he ain't selling cause he can't, he locked up his liquidity on staking v.0.1, that's why he's seething in every thread about le heckin fudderinos

[Anonymous No.55331727]

>>55324175
>It pretty much makes it impossible for the price to pump
You're retarded.

[Anonymous No.55331737]

>>55331656
>>55331668
>2 seething kekfuddies writing blogposts about a token they dont hold
Sorry kekfuddies I know this will be upsetting to hear but... that's just more wasted effort on your part. Didnt even read.
Still accumulating

[Anonymous No.55331738]

>>55324643
>I'll most likely stay away
No you won't.

You'll keep posting and fudding and gaslighting and generally obsessing over Chainlink every single day like you've been doing for the past years.

[Anonymous No.55331743]

>>55331727
>>55331738
> you've been doing for the past years
>>>/biz/image/Eds9xKWu4wr9Cuje0UPdTA
nice projection, astroturfing kike

[Anonymous No.55331750]

>>55331743
That pic is a rebuttal of the literal thousands of posts complaining about Sergey dumping.

Also, posting about a coin you hold =/= posting about a coin you don't hold.

[Anonymous No.55331757]

>>55331750
the pic is indisputable proof you've been shilling this pos here for literal years, the definition of projection

[Anonymous No.55331758]

>>55331757
That pic is a reaction to the absolute deluge of "muh sergey dumps" fud.
You moron.

[Anonymous No.55331765]

>>55331758
the pic is evidence of the organized astroturfing chainlink campaign that's been talking place in this board
the audacity of you accusing me of being obsessed is hilarious and pathetic at the same time

[Anonymous No.55331768]

>>55331765
First came thousands of posts fudding Sergey's dumps.

[Anonymous No.55331771]

>>55331768
thanks for conceding, nigger jew

[Anonymous No.55331779]

>>55331757
>getting angry about people shilling crypto on /biz/
Nigger this is literally the crypto shilling containment board.
It was created specifically to keep crypto shilling off of /g/

[Anonymous No.55331780]

>>55331779
hi, 1pbtid
then make a general, like every other crypto community here

[Anonymous No.55331786]

>>55331780
>then make a general
This is a fud thread. Like the vast majority of all Link threads have been.
I fully support a mandatory Link fud general.

[Anonymous No.55331787]

>>55331771
It's also funny how you think I made that pic, and am the only one who posts it.
Almost like you have no idea how this site works.

[Anonymous No.55331792]

>>55331786
>implying fud threads aren't made by the same bagholders
yeah, Idc if you name it "fud general" just contain your autism
>>55331787
yeah, that's why it didn't even occur to you to refute this immediately
sloppy work mossad

[Anonymous No.55331797]

>>55331792
>>implying fud threads aren't made by the same bagholders
You’re a fudder, are you a bagholder?

[Anonymous No.55331798]

>>55331797
did I make this thread mr 1pbtid?

[Anonymous No.55331803]

>>55331798
You claimed fudders are bagholders

[Anonymous No.55331808]

>>55331803
the OP is literally pretending to be a bagholder, this entire thread is populated by deranged self admitted bagholders, like (You), so you tell me

[Anonymous No.55331816]

>>55331808
The OP is a fudder.
You are a fudder.

If being a Link fudder means you are a bagholder like you said, then you must also be a bagholder.

[Anonymous No.55331824]

>>55331816
>if I throw semantics at his face he'll be confused
I said that fud threads are created by bagholders for other bagholders, I do not hold this and I never will.
I admit I've been following it though, thanks to your endless shilling, so you must be doing something right
nevertheless, pretending that "fudders" do not have intimate knowledge about this project that only holders could possibly possess is stupid, just take a look at all the fud memes on this board, they all come from twitter link marines who are absolutely seething, like ToonLink, ThomasLink or whatever the fuck his name is, Link Van stinkie, jason parser etc etc
good luck trying to convince me that the worst fudders AREN'T holders, kike

[Anonymous No.55331828]

>>55331808
>the OP is literally pretending to be a bagholder
You pretended to consider becoming a bagholder.
It's a key fuddie tactic.

[Anonymous No.55331832]

>>55331828
I did not pretend, I was actually considering getting a bag for a quick PnD, but your colleagues failed on closing the deal

[Anonymous No.55331836]

>>55331824
This spergtastic fud blogpost brought to you by the same guy who told linkies to “contain your autism”

[Anonymous No.55331843]

>>55331836
>lalalala I can't hear you lalalala
looks like I struck a nerve by outing your twitter shenanigans

[Anonymous No.55331849]

>>55331832
Upon review, you actually pretended to be a current bagholder as well kek

>>55327245
>I'm selling at $9 guys

[Anonymous No.55331852]

>>55331849
that's the highest I believe this goes, holy fuck you're like the master of pilpul aren't you, rabbi

[Anonymous No.55331856]

>>55331852
>that's the highest I believe this goes
Which explains why you personally will be selling at that price, as a current Link bagholder/fudder.

[Anonymous No.55331861]

>>55331856
>lalalala
may I ask something? why are all those 2pbtid posters taking your side phoneposting, including you?
seems highly sus

[Anonymous No.55331864]

>>55331861
I don't know, Link bagholder.

[Anonymous No.55331868]

>>55331864
>d-d-dunno
>y-y-you're bagholding, not me
kek, btfo
keep up your astroturfing campaign folks!

[Anonymous No.55331874]

>>55331868
>Linkies must make a general
>also I'm a Linkie

You basically told yourself to create a general.
Awkward.

[Anonymous No.55331876]

kek, looks like the shill is losing it and he resorts to gibberish
no more (You)s rabbi, go make another twitter thread about the lowest rate of inflation amongst all shitcoins LMAO

[Anonymous No.55331886]

you:
>>55331824
>I do not hold Link

also you:
>>>55327245
>I will be selling my Link at $9

[Anonymous No.55331890]

chilax linkies it is just 14% inflation...i mean 7%

[Anonymous No.55331891]

you
>a retard paid shill who wastes years of his life creating and spamming shitty link infographics and engaging in endless pilpul

also you
>reeeeeeeeeeee everybody's holding link and everybody's obsessed with me reeeeeeee

[Anonymous No.55331902]

>>55331743
>different filenames for a reused image by multiple people because it btfos the fuddie chuddie inflation spam
Wow big brain sherlock fuddie doesnt quite get it but he tried
>>55331876
>now up to 22pbtid about a token he doesnt hold, also projecting about astroturfing
How many posts you reckon youll get up to trying to gaslight people into selling this time? Are you that unhinged loser that made 130 posts in a single thread trying to fud the other day?
(Never selling, only buying btw)

[Anonymous No.55331906]

looks like the link defense force is here already, do they at least pay you overtime for shitposting on a sunday, on the graveyard shift nonetheless?

[Anonymous No.55331917]

>>55331906
>do they at least pay you overtime for shitposting on a sunday
t. 25 pbtid

[Anonymous No.55331921]

>much organic 1pbtid
kek, why is literally everyone phoneposting

[Anonymous No.55332470]

>26 pbtid

[Anonymous No.55332488]

>>55322794
test

[Anonymous No.55333912]

>>55323951
Why didn't you sell at $50? Why be in Link if you think it will only hit $80 when BTC hits $1'000,000? Just buy BTC

[Anonymous No.55335203]

>>55331743
Kek this sent the chainlink shills scattering like cockroaches in the light

[Anonymous No.55335217]

>>55331906

[Anonymous No.55335653]

>>55331743
>”astroturfing kike”
>26 pbtid

The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.

[Anonymous No.55337485]

Sergey just market dumped another 500,000 Link. Why is he not in jail again?

[Anonymous No.55337820]

>>55337485
>Sergey just market dumped another 500,000 Link. Why is he not in jail again?
because he has ~500m tokens left to dump first before the entire oracle network implodes on itself due to lack of subsidy

[Anonymous No.55337831]

set limit orders for around 1.50 once i heard the news of their dumping roadmap
actually hilarious what they're doing to holders

[Anonymous No.55337843]

>>55337831
my basterd, u are suppose to sell now not 1.5

[Anonymous No.55338135]

What are the odds that he ends up in prison for all his price manipulation activity? Has he actually done anything illegal?

[Anonymous No.55338727]

>>55331737
you're an old fag being used by Sergey Nazarov's unique business model. Pump his bag while he dumps. I hope you enjoy being lured. I'd always prefer other oracle projects like Dia to this sh*t, maybe DePIN like Iotex and Peaqnetwork to the crap.

Stop feeding Sergey Nazarov and the hot girls he hired as HR.

[Anonymous No.55338748]

>>55331668
Exactly. I bet that schmuck don't even have any of the token.

[Anonymous No.55339345]

>>55322794
We should all literally not sell ever

[Anonymous No.55339622]

>>55329898
giga based

[Anonymous No.55339711]

token emissions are basically the same
link will pump with bull and maybe with ccip and more staking
but most of all if its holders blindly shilled it like with other projects

[Anonymous No.55339935]

>>55322794
>>/biz/thread/S54417574
Is there any truth to this schizo thread? It is an "elite insider" describing how there will be a micronova and a series of convergent catastrophes taking place soon, some of them deliberate/psyops. The glowies are preparing for this by developing crypto tech that could mitigate the effects and allow them to keep their assets, while promoting the false coins for the goyim so that they can rug pull and make profits from the real coins.
>Basically the Earths Magnetic field has not the same density and strength everywhere so some regions will be more affected than others. Thanks to decentralization and Blockchain the "lost" regions will be able to recover and restore their state. its also not a coincidence that the "Recovery tools" form a Sun when arranged together or why Chainlink is a "hexagon" and we all know by now what that means.
I am a high-level schizo so I understand that glowies run this world. If I can verify a coin is backed by glowies that's all I need to know to go all in. If it is backed by glowies it is going to moon. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.55339976]

>>55339935
The coins he mentioned were basically:
>ROSE
>AVAX
>LINK
I don't really know much about crypto, I am just a neet who reads conspiracies all day. Can someone who understands the technical stuff verify what he was saying in the thread? The micronova event and fake blackout track with my research, something big is 100% coming, and soon, like 2024 from my research but also personal psychic intuition. I just need to know if these coins are indeed backed by glowies because I am going all in if true.

[Anonymous No.55340098]

>>55337485
Bitcoin dumped.

[Anonymous No.55340105]

>>55338727
>Sergey Nazarov's unique business model
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH no