Is it really that easy?

[Anonymous No.55275112]

>just chase trends even though your last trend chase was a catastrophic failure and you don't really have an edge on any of your competitors in the new area, and fire a shit ton of people
>try to ban your competitor that's eating you alive, except none of it goes nowhere
>retards still fomo in and throw their life savings into your stock

[Anonymous No.55275272]

Zuck should have just made his crypto. Would have turned out better than his metaverse shite.

[Anonymous No.55277099]

>>55275272
It never launched

[Anonymous No.55277144]

What competitor is he trying to ban?

Anyway my counter:
>FB has diverse revenue streams that have proved resilient to different economic conditions
>eminently profitable which is the most important thing for a company since you're buying a share of future profits when you invest
>working on a twitter competitor
>got Apple interested in AR/VR, can now position as the much cheaper alternative to Apple's wildly overpriced headset
>still researching metaverse & AI
>has been one of the largest publishers of AI research for years
Meta prints

[Anonymous No.55277150]

>>55277144
Meta this, meta that, I wish you woulda meta girl instead you fuckin loser

[Anonymous No.55277170]

>>55277144
>>working on a twitter competitor
>>got Apple interested in AR/VR, can now position as the much cheaper alternative to Apple's wildly overpriced headset
>>still researching metaverse & AI
>>has been one of the largest publishers of AI research for years
none of these will make them money

[Anonymous No.55277179]

>>55275112
Facebook stil has billions of users, primarly among boomers and third world countries.

And they know how to convert the data they collect freely into cash.

So no suprise thair stock boomed when Zuck got his shit together and dumped the metaverse.