No 1uck thread?

[Anonymous No.55245850]

1uck Thread.

When moon etc?

[Anonymous No.55246356]

Comfy hold over the weekend. I'm gonna go enjoy some nice weather tomorrow, you all should

[Anonymous No.55246567]

>>55246356
I've asked this before but...

I'm retarded - my goal is money, obviously. Do I keep this coin and sell it later, or am I supposed to use it as some access token to some casino to make it big? What are you doing with your coins?

[Anonymous No.55246617]

>>55246567
>I've asked this before but...
> Do I keep this coin and sell it later?

Sell now. It's going to dump soon. Something big is coming. Stay tuned for it. All the issues with this token will be exposed.

[Anonymous No.55246707]

>>55246617
Go on..

[Anonymous No.55246936]

>>55246707
i would hold
so many copycats
so much FUD
easy 10x maybe even 133x

[Anonymous No.55247178]

i wanna suck a nice pair of perky college titties

[Anonymous No.55247217]

>>55246617
>1pbtid

[Anonymous No.55247371]

>>55246617

[Anonymous No.55247407]

>>55245850
Big things coming for this, can confirm there is a team working on website, dashboard & slot machine games.

[Anonymous No.55247899]

https://www.1uck.biz

Check it out so far. Can buy using Rubic now on the website too, should be quicker and easier than pancakeswap.

[Anonymous No.55247908]

>>55247899
This is just v1, v2 & v3 coming very soon.

[Anonymous No.55247928]

>>55247899
Good job anons

[Anonymous No.55248009]

>moon
>comfy
>FUD
>team
>website

[Anonymous No.55248134]

>>55247899

>https://www.1uck.biz

Great work so far anon! Looks like we can soon start to shill beyond /biz/

[Anonymous No.55248139]

The website will soon have a fully featured casino with slot games using chainlink smart contracts. Exciting stuff.

[Anonymous No.55248307]

>>55247899

BULLISH BULLISH BULLISH

Can finally see pot size

[Anonymous No.55248309]

>>55246356
>Comfy hold over the week-ACK

[Anonymous No.55248385]

>>55248134
>rubic
You must be joking...

[Anonymous No.55248395]

>>55248385
Sorry, i meant this one >>55247899

[Anonymous No.55248531]

>>55248395
>my rubic stays cubic

[Anonymous No.55248663]

>>55246617
how's the weather in kashmir?

[Anonymous No.55248975]

>>55247899
impressive, looks good

[Anonymous No.55249038]

>LOTTO, MONTE, BLOCKHOTEL and all the other copycats already dead
>This still going strong

[Anonymous No.55249047]

I never would’ve believed they actually did it.
The website is there.
Holy fuck nice work anons.

[Anonymous No.55249378]

>>55249047
>>55248009

[Anonymous No.55249648]

>>55249038
Dont forget the last rugpull, dead in 6 hours
TOPKEK

[Anonymous No.55249831]

>be my portfolio
>everything is red
>1uck only thing green
I panic sold half my bags when it dumped from ath
should have bought more in stead

[Anonymous No.55249924]

>>55249831
>mfw I bought 2$ worth at 600$ mcap (yes, six hundred dollars)
>mfw I sold at 10k mcap cause I was certain its just another shitcoin
fw its a legit project and its never gonna go below 00k mcap again
>price out

Help. I dont know how to cope with these feelings. Its overwhelming me.

[Anonymous No.55250869]

>Be 1uck team
>Code revolutionary token
>Build website to interface with it
>Unable to make a thread highlighting the unique properties of 1uck

Where’s the autist responsible for the early threads. Get him to make it. The Shitcoin threads are more informational then the only coin on the board that does something.

[Anonymous No.55250955]

>>55247899
>rubic widget on website
Bearish af

[Anonymous No.55250990]

I've been spending the last few days researching everything I could about 0xGamble (1UCK) and I found a lot of interesting stuff hidden in the code, as well as in the dev's OG post and his on chain activity.

I will try to be as clear as I can, but if things get confusing sometimes it's just me not organizing my ideas properly.

First, let's address the elephant in the room: bug or no bug?

A few days ago there was a whole discussion about a potential bug in the code of the smart contract.
Fellow anons started digging and it was confirmed that there really was an "unforeseen" interaction in the case of wining the pot by buying the token.
In short, winning the pot by buying does not award the pot to the user. In stead it gets sent to the PancakeSwap liquidity contract, where it remains inaccessible forever, kind of like a secondary burn.
Selling and transferring 1uck works as advertised, and can still win you the pot.
This has been demonstrated with on chain data and can no longer be disputed.
But, since it's not sent to the dev or something like this, and the tokens just get taken out of circulation, the community seems to have accepted it as a harmless 'oopsie' and moved on.
But something kept bugged me, so I dug a little deeper.
The dev did a really good job with the rest of the code. Could he have missed such a simple bug?
Maybe... but there is another possibility: that it was done intentionally.
This also raises the question why, but we'll look at that later on.

[Anonymous No.55251004]

>>55250990

>down the rabbit hole we go
Looking at the dev's original post, considering the "buggy" interaction was not explicitly described in the original post, the most obvious conclusion would be that "he messed up".
The text of the OG post looks and sounds like your typical /biz/talk shill post, right?
But on a closer look, the wording is very deliberate.

>Everything is boring as hell!
>>muh meme token
>>muh utility
>>muh innovation
>All bullhit! It's all a money grab, banking on the last bull run momentum.
>Everyone is in a loop.
Everything is predictable and boring. The same things being made over and over, with the same intentions and the same MO. Everyone is in a loop.

>So I made something fun
Meaning 1uck is different, unpredictable, fun.

>>0xGamble (ticker: 1UCK)
>>max supply: 123456789
>>no minting, no backdoors, burn included on every TX
>>literally just launched
>>$365 MC (threehundredandsixtyfive american dollars)
>>degenerate gambling fun included
>>no bullshit
This part is pretty straight forward, but it reinforces the idea of "degenerate gambling fun" and "no bullshit". Meaning, unpredictable but exciting stuff can happen, without ulterior motives.

[Anonymous No.55251018]

>>55251004

>0xGamble is, as the name implies, a gambling token.
>Let me explain...
>>1% tax on every TX - 50% burned, 50% goes into the 'pot'
>>every TX generates a random number internally (not true randomness, I know; but good enough)
>>number is divisible by 69, the 'house' wins the 'pot' (that's me - thanks for playing kek)
>>number is divisible by 420, you (the guy making the transaction) win the 'pot' (congratulations anon, you deserve it)
>>number is divisible by 1337, the 'pot' is burned forever
This is where the wording becomes really important, and where the "bug" discussion comes from.
In this section there is no mention of any "buy/sell/transfer". Just TXs. which means any "type" of transaction.
Focusing on the 420 scenario, while this can be seen as "the USER would win the pot", the "guy" making the transaction is not explicitly stated to be the user. It can be users' wallets OR SMART CONTRACTS like liquidity pools, front running bots, or any other type of smart contracts than can also participate in the game.
And, technically speaking, this is exactly what the 1uck contract does.
But let's continue.

>In other words
>>buy/sell/transfer - chance to win the pot
>>hold - tokens get burned, price go up
>>provide liquidity - liquidity rewards + tokens get burned, price go up
This section is very important.
Everything else so far is littered with NUMBERS, but for this section, from the very beginning, the dev draws attention to the importance of WORDS.
Reading this, the first thing you would naturally think is that you as a USER have the "chance to win the pot" by buying/selling/transferring the tokens. So the winnings for buys going to the liquidity pool contract can again be seen as a "bug" at first read.
But in this section, the dev no longer mentions any 'guy' that would win the pot, there is no clear "subject" for the action of winning.
So again, the "chance to win the pot" REMAINS TRUE and there is no contradiction in the code.

[Anonymous No.55251033]

>>55251018

Now comes the best part, and what I believe was the final clue the dev left to show that everything actually works as intended.
>Nobody knows if and when anyone (the 'house' included) will win the pot. Or if it will get burned and we have to wait for a new pot.
It goes back to the idea of being unpredictable. "Nobody knows" if the pot will be won, or "burned", like it happens when buys trigger the win and it gets lost in the LP smart contract.
Again, he doesn't mention who "wins", or WHERE it gets "burned".
>And that's alright.
This can be seen like an assurance that "all is as it should be", and...
>We all win.
Which is again true: "tokens get burned, price go up".

On its own, all this is still just speculation, but I think I found enough supporting evidence that it's not. I'll share that as well once I organize a little better.
There is still the question of "why", and I have a theory about this as well. It ties into some other "clues" left by the dev, and I'll post about those too.

There's a lot more interesting stuff that I found. I will continue digging and share my findings and theories as I go.

[Anonymous No.55251248]

>>55251033
holy shit that's a lot of text

[Anonymous No.55251344]

>>55251248
I know, it's the best I could do
I'll try to keep future posts shorter, but there's a lot of stuff to talk about

[Anonymous No.55251567]

>>55251344
so what you are saying is that there is no bug trust the plan?
you still haven't said anything about why tho

[Anonymous No.55251651]

>>55251567
yeah
I think there's a second game hidden, a second gamble so to say
I'm still putting things together, but this is what it looks like

[Anonymous No.55251950]

>>55251033
take your meds

[Anonymous No.55252054]

>>55251950
>take your meds
meds stopped working a long time ago

[Anonymous No.55252067]

>>55251950
t.

[Anonymous No.55253134]

>>55250990
tl;dr anyone?

[Anonymous No.55253163]

The dump is over, our time has come

[Anonymous No.55253230]

>>55253134
FUD: buy tx was supposed to be able to get a "pot win", but in truth, instead of pot win it technically burns
THEORY: intentional
FACT: burning makes price go up so we all win

[Anonymous No.55253248]

Everything else in the red and 1uck is fucking pumping!

[Anonymous No.55253559]

the player who gets the last coin is the winner!

[Anonymous No.55254167]

Find it funny there's another copy I think everyone missed literally called 0xgamble on eth chain. Another scam copy deployed one day after and rugged the same day. So bullish on this I really hope we get games working soon

[Anonymous No.55254320]

was actually expecting a dump, but so far it looks like 200k mc is on the table

[Anonymous No.55254550]

>>55254320
>tfw realize the networth of everyone on /biz/ is <$200k

[Anonymous No.55254748]

>>55249038
>>55249648
Okay, Blockhotel isn't doing too bad. I'll keep holding that one for now.

[Anonymous No.55254995]

>>55251033
Interesting shit. Its pretty mindblowing if that's intentional. The hidden song in the code with the song length being 4:20, '420 burning/smoking pot' too. Definitely post your other theories here if you have any. I'm interested in the cryptic messages and gematria stuff

[Anonymous No.55256040]

Doubling down on my 2x

[Anonymous No.55256181]

its pretty simple, it spawned on fokahn i will not sell. I made mistake with gayfarm/gns already. Only thing i regret is not buying at 1.5k mcap

[Anonymous No.55256634]

My career plans rest on my one-UCK investment. put me on the moon or in the ground. What say yee, fellow one-UCK enjoyers?

[Anonymous No.55256738]

I'll take my chances with the Monte one. The dev actually has a vision and idea.

[Anonymous No.55256855]

Any price prediction sirs ?

[Anonymous No.55257033]

>>55256855

Whatever the valuation of a simple casino is. So couple mil IMO. Given it’s the first it might have a little more juice in it then that. I have a feeling we’re gonna see more of these things and not just from Monte so it will turn into a competitive market.

If you had every game running like a real big casino? Like bellagio…100m or more.so I guess the price depends on how far you want it to go.

[Anonymous No.55257101]

>>55257033
So $1 per token ?
Omg Village will be rich sir

[Anonymous No.55257137]

>>55257101
IF you build a mega casino it will fetch a mega casino price. The newest mega casino in Vegas is resorts world. The project was 1.5b to finish. What you have right now is not worth 1.5b though.

[Anonymous No.55257157]

I'm loading up my MONTE bag. Here's a sneak peak of what's about to come. It's almost time for the migration and might happen anytime. The issues with the code have been fixed. The v1 application is also ready. MONTE will also allow 1UCK holders to play using their tokens. However, Monte holders will be incentivised. The migration will be seamless(similar to NGUF). With or without you all, MONTE will start its operations soon.

[Anonymous No.55258222]

>>55257157
They copy pasted 1uck's contract. All copycats rugged so far (slot, lotto, etc)

1 1uck = 1 1uck

[Anonymous No.55258322]

>>55258222
No reason to not back all the horses in this race. There isn't only one winner. We know the idea is sound, we know the code is good, monte has some nice stuff over 1uck so far. Buy both to be sure.

[Anonymous No.55258563]

>>55247899
>https://www.1uck.biz

I like it so far. WHat do you think aboiut adding the following things:

jackpot also shown in usd

a chart that shows the lastest txn that had an impact in the jackpot and burned tokens with a hyperlink to bscscan

A Link to the contract so potential buyers can fly over it

https://www.1uck.biz

[Anonymous No.55258632]

"One" - The Next Bitcoin Revolution, Exclusively on BSC!


Discover the Power of Simplicity! Join "One" - the BSC Token with Only 1 Coin Supply!

Are you ready to embrace the true spirit of decentralization? Look no further than "One" - the fully community-driven Binance Smart Chain (BSC) token that follows in the footsteps of Bitcoin's legendary legacy. Just like Bitcoin, "One" has no website, no Telegram group, and no other social media presence, as it solely focuses on the fundamentals of a groundbreaking cryptocurrency.

One Coin, Infinite Possibilities:
"One" stands out from the crowd with its remarkable feature - a finite supply of only 1 coin. This scarcity creates a sense of exclusivity and immense potential for early adopters. As demand for "One" grows, the value of each token has the chance to soar to new heights, empowering you to secure a piece of history.


CA : 0xa01fc7Ba2CDad343861B40c6330FAc08f8c50D66
LIQUIDITY BURNED : https://bscscan.com/tx/0xef9db0fb4c9c17fbbb19050b4adee03151e35f445d269b6913b1f4b089d53a4c
Renounched : https://bscscan.com/tx/0x927a126f99a7f74f4a2ecf78507201d29c6f718e7fc994e89219e89fab716628
Chart : https://www.geckoterminal.com/bsc/pools/0x5de261fba76e2f63d1816db3c89e1c4c4f1db555
Buy link : https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?outputCurrency=0xa01fc7ba2cdad343861b40c6330fac08f8c50d66

[Anonymous No.55258661]

>>55258632
>0xa01fc7Ba2CDad343861B40c6330FAc08f8c50D66

no thanks

[Anonymous No.55258923]

>>55258222
People talked shit about blockhotel too, but now it just did a 3x overnight. Lottery is the only one I got burned on, but it didn't rug, it just died out.

[Anonymous No.55259348]

The game is on fellow anons!

Are you ready for MONTE v2 ?

Loads your bags! You don't want to miss this.

>>55259148

[Anonymous No.55259432]

>>55259348
>>55258322
>>55257157
>>55256738
the samefag is back

>>55258661
exposed here

[Anonymous No.55259462]

>>55259432

Just waiting to crash your party fren. Need some more liquidity to dump my 1UCK sui stack on you dickheads.

[Anonymous No.55259491]

>>55259462
>unequivocally exposed for scamming
>"i'm going to dump on you dickheads!"

you are mentally ill anon, get some help.

[Anonymous No.55259525]

>>55259491
Anon it's frightening that you are not able to read a chart and see that if people are selling there can't be a 100% tax and your image is clearly a lie. You're the same person posting in every thread that everyone who talks about Monte is the dev. I'm starting to think you're the 1UCK dev trying to protect your bag. If you don 't like Monte don't buy it, but their foundation is there and people see it.

[Anonymous No.55259582]

>>55259525
more than one person thinks you are the dev, check the 1uck tg

[Anonymous No.55259594]

Crypto is dying because of jeets like you. I hope you kill yourself

[Anonymous No.55259601]

>>55259491
Listen idiot! Let me ELI5 to your pea brain. I am one of the early buyers in 1UCK and bought a massive bag. However, I didn't like how volatile it was and how the contract was not feeding the LP much. So, I sold half my stack at the top for a good profit. If you look at the LP/MC ratio and the chart, you'll clearly see what's going on, and that's not a good sign for a token in the long run. It's just good for swing trading, and pump and dumps. I'm really looking for to exit my position, as I don't see this coin surviving amidst the likes of other projects that are popping up all over biz - BLOCK, NGUF, MONTE

[Anonymous No.55259624]

>>55259582
1UCK tg is a mess and I left it. Have you even been in the MONTE tg or spoken to the dev? It's an actual project and not a cult

[Anonymous No.55259626]

>>55259601
Okay monte creator

[Anonymous No.55259640]

>>55259624
go and stay in your own thread then shitskin. You want me to go in your thread and spam about how you're a 1uck copycat 24/7? see what happens.

[Anonymous No.55259721]

>>55259432
Mass replying newfags get the rope. Now hop in the washing machine you fucking nigger

[Anonymous No.55260859]

>>55251033
interesting take anon, curious to see what else you got

[Anonymous No.55260877]

the amount of FUD for a $100k mc coin is insanely bullish

[Anonymous No.55261441]

This needs exposure in the pajeetsphere, unironically. Give monekys an easy way to pull the lever it will blast the fuck off. I'm feeling same vibes as GUH, token was also born here, also had a fun mechanic. Got in at sub 100 holders and once anons figured out how to explain it to pajeets it did a nX

[Anonymous No.55261541]

>>55256634

[Anonymous No.55263089]

>>55259601
holy shit, kys, fucking scammer

[Anonymous No.55263983]

>>55251033

In my previous rant about 1uck I was presenting my theory on why I think the "bug" where the pot is getting "burned" by the liquidity pool in stead of being awarded to the user is actually intentional, and is hinted at multiple times in the dev's OG post.

I believe that this is part of a yet to be discovered game, that I'm still researching.

While searching for this hidden game, I actually gave a lot of thought to the second "problem" that people have been raising about the contract: the deterministic nature of the TX based gambling mechanics.

The issue is that the TX gamble is not truly random. In stead, it's based on predetermined conditions and known quantities, which make it vulnerable to possible "sniping" of the pot.

And again, this is proven true with on chain data. The pot CAN be sniped through trial and error and careful timing by some high IQ anons that invest enough time into tracking and calculating the right time and amount to "play".

This is very similar to the concept of "counting cards" in a card game, which most card game gamblers are familiar with.

[Anonymous No.55263995]

>>55263983

In every card game, it is theoretically possible to keep track of what cards are played throughout the game, calculate the best odds for yourself in the game, and play them at the most opportune time in order to win the game.

And while you CAN do this, not everyone is actually able to. You have to be versed in the game and have the mental edge over the other players in order to do this.

Also, timing is really important on multiple levels. You can count the cards and keep winning ever hand, but that usually means that you keep winning small pots from each hand. The alternative is to wait until the right hand, when the pot is significant, and play your best hand in order to win the biggest pot, but then there is the risk that another player on the table to win the pot before you, or get the better odds by chance.

Well, this is exactly what's happening with the 1uck TX game!

But that's not all. Compared to the card game analogy, 1uck is more akin to a MMO-gambling game, where huge numbers of players compete simultaneously.
You can have hundreds, even thousands of "players" transacting 1uck at the same time, with pots being generated and won all the time.
The more activity the token has, the harder it is for a single "sniper" to successfully target the pot.

Now imagine a few dozen "snipers" fighting over the pot, while everyone else plays the "normie" game at the same time. This turns into a high speed, high risk gambling duel where anyone trigger the pot at any time - not just the "snipers".

[Anonymous No.55264008]

>>55263995

And the best clue that this was also intentional is again the OG post.
>every TX generates a random number internally (not true randomness, I know; but good enough)
The dev is clearly aware of all this, yet he chose to leave this as is. Not only that, he had to actively build the logic into the contract. I find it hard to believe that he didn't research this enough to have other options available.

I believe this was part of the "gift" he mentioned here
>I give this gift to you /biz/, use it well.

And while this might seem like a loophole in the gambling game of the contract, everyone still wins by holding the tokens (through burning), or playing the game.

There is still the question of WHY, which I didn't get to yet, I know. But so far we have two hidden mini-games besides the main one that anyone can play without actually taking away from the chances of other players.

Counting the cards doesn't always mean you win the game, and "sniping" the pot works the same way. Anyone can still win the pot the normal way and leave the "snipers" hanging.

I have a lot more to share. If this thread is still up tomorrow I'll do it here. Otherwise I'll post in the next main thread I find up.

If any other anons have some other theories too, please also share them here.

[Anonymous No.55264311]

>>55263995

>You can have hundreds, even thousands of "players" transacting 1uck at the same time, with pots being generated and won all the time.
The more activity the token has, the harder it is for a single "sniper" to successfully target the pot.

it won't be a problem when transactions rise due to popularity

>>55264008

>every TX generates a random number internally (not true randomness, I know; but good enough)
The dev is clearly aware of all this, yet he chose to leave this as is. Not only that, he had to actively build the logic into the contract. I find it hard to believe that he didn't research this enough to have other options available.

this incentivizes trade hence more token get burned making 1uck and its pot size grow in value

[Anonymous No.55264470]

>>55264008
yo we new thread

[Anonymous No.55264981]

>>55264008
people seem to ignore the gas costs of running a sniper bot just to win small pots
in order for sniping to be viable the pot size has to be greater than the gas costs used to win it

[Anonymous No.55265378]

>>55263983
>>55264008
i'm a holder but there's absolutely no way im reading all of this shit