/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.55198757]

>Ccip imminent
>SEC goes after binance
Weird

[Anonymous No.55198769]

Why does biz dickride this jew?

[Anonymous No.55198793]

>every thing revolves around my shitcoin
this sub wants you to believe this behavior is normal.

[Anonymous No.55198805]

>>55198757
how does $6 make u feel?

[Anonymous No.55198816]

>>55198793
>every thing revolves around my shitcoin
https://youtu.be/8nEPWUFgfvk

[Anonymous No.55198819]

>>55198757
I had considered this same scenario
CCIP imminent, SWIFT obviously going to bring tons of tradfi $ into crypto, perhaps Gensler is trying to clean up?

But if that were the case, why are we still dumping? That's the issue, no matter how many bullish scenarios and what ifs I play out in my head, it makes absolutely no sense that we are still dumping.

Aka we might be fucked.

[Anonymous No.55198833]

>>55198757
Giga poomp incoming
Buy now or regret it later

[Anonymous No.55198842]

>>55198816
All of these announcements were made at the end of the bullrun when prices usually go down. Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.55198848]

>>55198819
You’re not making any sense retard

[Anonymous No.55198865]

>>55198848
I'm telling you that you're not making any sense
Whatever bullish scenario you're conjuring in your head that is making you post a picture of Ari smugly smiling in nothing more that schizo babble

[Anonymous No.55198866]

>>55198819
>we

[Anonymous No.55198878]

>most important lawsuit in securities and commodities history involving a brand new asset class is about to end
>they sue binance
>a month before G7 crypto regulations
Yes, very interesting indeed.

[Anonymous No.55198922]

>>55198816
pure cohencidence.

[Anonymous No.55198941]

>>55198865
Why do you talk like a fucking nerd? I hope you get bullied to death

[Anonymous No.55199023]

>Weird
Originally Wyrd in old english. Meaning 'the power over destiny' referring to the three sisters, the fates, who were oracles.
In myth, the fates were known as Morai and knew the destinies of each person despite humanities free will. The Morai also means 'alloters' and in this role they would hand out 'alloted portions' or 'shares' to each person.
Some believers held them to be daughters of Themis, the goddess of justice and divine order. And that without them the cycles of souls would be in chaos.
The belief was that they decided how each person would receive their 'portion' or 'lot' whether this was food, land, wealth, even glory or death. And to take someone’s share or portion, you would be taking their rightful lot as given by fate.
The word essentially means fate. Which is a predetermined course of events.

[Anonymous No.55199041]

https://chain.link/cross-chain

[Anonymous No.55199058]

>>55199041
That page is old as fuck what’s your point?

[Anonymous No.55199074]

>>55199041
You're down 90% against USD
You're down 92% against ETH
You're down 85% against BTC
You don't get to be smug you moron.

[Anonymous No.55199120]

>You're down 90% against USD
>You're down 92% against ETH
>You're down 85% against BTC
>You don't get to be smug you moron.

[Anonymous No.55199148]

>>55199023
Very based post

[Anonymous No.55199509]

>>55198941
fr, want to shove that fucking nerd in a locker. come up with that fag talk, get rekt

[Anonymous No.55199642]

>>55199074

Lol I'm not selling my LINK you creepy fuck. Get a real job

[Anonymous No.55199799]

>>55199120
Too pussy to reply at me?

>>55199642
Keep being poor.

[Anonymous No.55199826]

>>55198819
>>55198865
>>55198793
>>55199074
>>55198842
>kekfuddies SEETHING because people here still wont sell their linkies - only buy more - with btc shitting the bed and link confirmed to not be a security
Please write more essays about how upset you are. JNGS.

[Anonymous No.55199859]

>>55199826
How exactly is stating facts "seething"? Are absolute morons the only people left holding this piece of shit?

[Anonymous No.55199903]

>>55198819
My god, Chainies are just as ill as Trannies

[SAGE No.55199917]

>>55199859
>>55199903
>more seething
Yes, very good - with extra salt just like I requested
Do you know what JNGS means?

[Anonymous No.55199945]

this really riles them up

[Anonymous No.55199962]

>>55198816
KEK I laughed so loud. Fucking real

[Anonymous No.55200493]

>>55198757
>Ccip imminent
>crickets for 18 months
habbening any day now, r-right?

[Anonymous No.55201005]

>>55199074
You will never be a woman

[Anonymous No.55201012]

This is more data on a very poorly constructed unethical social fascistic series of experiments
Literally crimes against humanity

[Anonymous No.55201399]

>>55201005
I sincerely hope you die.

[Anonymous No.55201409]

>>55198757
>SEC
Literally who? I don't follow mystery meat goblino politics.

[Anonymous No.55201441]

>>55201399
His death won't magically make you a lady, faggot.

[Anonymous No.55201443]

>>55199074
And yet

[Anonymous No.55201502]

>>55198819
Ya Gensler is definitely just looking out for us bro. lmao

[Anonymous No.55201510]

>>55199023
Hi Ari.

[Anonymous No.55201514]

Imagine holding last cycle's shitcoin KEK

[Anonymous No.55201601]

>>55200493
>>55201399
>>55201514
Ooof they're still tryin
but it's still a case of JNGS (just not gonna sell)
(its like didnt read not selling but different)

[Anonymous No.55201620]

>>55198842
About half of them are from Bitcoin's run-up to 60k+ you goofy retard.

[Anonymous No.55201636]

>>55198819
true, markets trade the future, not the present. if ccip had potential, price would have gone up proportionally to the likelihood of it being a success. seems like it either has no potential, the market thinks that it won't succeed or that nobody cares. $1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.55201652]

>>55201636
the market want sergay to deliver his promises. Currently the token is not needed and the market deemed it so

[Anonymous No.55201658]

>>55201652
>Currently the token is not needed
The token has been a necessity since May 2019.

[Anonymous No.55201671]

>>55201652
>the market want sergay to deliver his promises
Funny how the market only demands this from Sergey, and not Charles, Vitalik, etc.

[Anonymous No.55201672]

>>55201658
ok, but that is on paper and it is well overdue. I dont need chainlink token right now, and i can afford a few bucks differences when he finally deliver.

[Anonymous No.55201683]

>>55201672
>that is on paper
No
Mainnet nodes have never been able to do anything without the token.

[Anonymous No.55201703]

>>55198757
Obviously I'm against regulation and the SEC but binance and CZ have always given off such an insane third world shit vibe, there's no question that their shit Exchange isn't doing business properly.

[Anonymous No.55201747]

>>55201683
their user base is very limited to only corps/players that want to use their oracles, and they are not in a rush to buy link. We as retailers have no use for chainlink other than speculation. Its a good long term hold, but for now, i dont think retailers want chainlink, which is why shorters are winning.

[Anonymous No.55201752]

>>55201671
not sure what you are talking about, it's the same demands for every lead figure. but this is a thread about link, do you want every criticism relativized with "(but this applies to vitalik and charles as well, even though we aren't talking about their project right now)"? sometimes i think bagholders pick one talking point and just repeat it, despite it making no sense whatsoever

[Anonymous No.55201765]

>>55201752
>not sure what you are talking about
He's talking about pic related.

>>55201747
>their user base is very limited
lmao, yeah only like most of crypto uses it.

>We as retailers have no use for chainlink other than speculation
You need Link for VRF, automation, functions, etc.
And you're paying for Link tokens whenever you use projects that rely on the price feeds as well.

[Anonymous No.55201769]

>>55201752
>it's the same demands for every lead figure
That’s not what the charts and rankings say lmao

[Anonymous No.55201773]

>>55198757
It is genuinely unbelievable that we can still buy at these prices. I know it sucks that we have been crabbing for so long but once we lift off for real there is no looking back.

[Anonymous No.55201795]

>>55201765
that just mean the demand does not meet the expected price, so the market is currently discounting it at a fair price. I will wait until i can gauged the value of ccip even if i have to buy it at $10.

[Anonymous No.55201807]

>>55201765
if you leave your victim complex filter bubble, you will see all the same demands and vitriol

[Anonymous No.55201842]

>>55201807
>if you ignore objective facts, you will see that I'm right
kek

>>55201795
>that just mean the demand does not meet the expected price
What a completely meaningless and overwrought platitude you just shat out of your anus.
And drippingly ESL to boot.

[Anonymous No.55201863]

>>55201842
>ignore objective facts
what facts? are you saying that you have never seen the picture that i posted? if so, you have no frame of reference for what you are talking about. the only way you can make assertions about other crypto projects without engaging with them is to pull them out of your ass. that's not unusual for crypto tribalism, but you are doing it so you can whine about the world being unfair to link. that's pretty sad anon

[Anonymous No.55201866]

>>55201863
>what facts?
price action and CMC rank

[Anonymous No.55202047]

Everyone here knows Chainlink is the darling of the banks and the deep state. Pretending it's under threat or going to disappear might be good to while away some time, but we all know where this is headed.
Weak hands will always be shaken out. Soon we begin out inexorable journey to $1000 and beyond. You just need to do nothing.
That's a great quote for capturing how to make it with Link..
"All you needed to do was nothing"

[Anonymous No.55202063]

>>55201866
weren't we talking about "unreasonable demands of poor sergey not making his self imposed deadlines"? that doesn't have anything to do with price or market cap

[Anonymous No.55202074]

>>55201866
Please use the unofficial Chainlink threads for all price discussion thanks!

[Anonymous No.55202094]

>>55201747
>shorters are winning
I have been shorting LINK for a year and barely made anything. It ranges between $6 and $9, so unless you actively time the tops and short with leverage, shorting LINK has been very disappointing.

[Anonymous No.55202106]

>>55202063
We were talking about the market treating Sergey differently from others.

[Anonymous No.55202218]

>>55202106
how is it treating Sergey different from others when LINK has the same chart as VET?

[Anonymous No.55202243]

>>55202218
Because Chainlink should be treated like VET, and not like ETH or ADA?

[Anonymous No.55202286]

>>55202243
You completely avoided responding, how is the narket treating it differently if it prices it exactly like every other altcoin out there?

[Anonymous No.55202292]

>>55202286
The last thing VET did of note was that fake partnership with BMW six years ago.

[Anonymous No.55202305]

>>55202292
???
You still won't answer the question directly, how is the market treating LINK differently, when LINK consistently performs on par with the vast majority of alts out there.
It is a fairly straight forward question anon.

[Anonymous No.55202339]

>>55202305
Why is Link being punished for one single delay, when other alts aren't punished at all for many worse delays?

[Anonymous No.55202347]

>>55202305
link is inarguably critical to defi and has had some of the most bullish news in the space by far over the last few years but is consistently and provably suppressed by btc movements, while biz has an army of fulltime fudcucks like yourself who constantly fuck up like pic related

ETH is important atm and cops a fair amount of shit, stuff like VET and ADA are not important and dont do anything, but you suggest that they're on the same level as link and biz knows you wouldnt be caught dead wasting thousands of hours of your life bitching about VET or ADA

in summary: sorry fudcuck - just not selling

[Anonymous No.55202355]

>>55202347
>samefags with obvious ID switch
>immediately responds to himself with the same ID
>"conciously"

I legit laughed out loud.

[Anonymous No.55202359]

>>55202339
how is LINK specifically being punished when it has the exact same performance as VET bro?
>>55202355
not him, take meds

[Anonymous No.55202362]

>>55202347
>you suggest that they're on the same level as lin
I don't suggest anything, the chart does

[Anonymous No.55202366]

>>55202359
>how is LINK specifically being punished when it has the exact same performance as VET bro?
Why don't ETH, ADA, XRP, ... have the exact same performance as VET?

>not him
I was talking about the pic, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.55202370]

>>55202355
if you check out >>55202181 you'll notice he deleted the second greenid post as well after being caught
truly the brightest minds running this "demoralization" op lmao
>>55202359
>>55202362
oh we're not saying that you're that guy specifically, but that's probably one of your 'colleagues' for sure
you're embarrassingly shit at this (and had no real rebuttal to what is aid) and only encourage the streisand effect for lurkers
there are some pretty big losers on this board but the nufudder discord pasta was right about fudcucks being a lower form of life than internet janitors for sure lmao

[Anonymous No.55202383]

>>55198941
If I'm a nerd to you, then I guess you don't think very highly of your own intelligenence. I'm sorry you feel that way

>>55199903
There is a clear dissonance between what Gensler is doing (attacking the crypto market), and what we all know is going on behind the scenes, and I can't quite wrap my head around it.

[Anonymous No.55202384]

>>55202370
>>55202366
>>55202362
>>55202359
>>55202355
>>55202347
>>55202339
>>55202305
>>55202292
>>55202286
>>55202243
>>55202218
>>55202106
>>55202094
>>55202074
>>55202063
>>55202047
>>55201866
>>55201863
Kek fuddies

[Anonymous No.55202386]

>>55202366
but they do
expecting the same performance with ETH is unreasonable, nothing is comparable to it, it's not even an altcoin at this point
>>55202370
I literally have no idea what you're talking about, and I'm not going to bother at all lmao

[Anonymous No.55202402]

>>55202386
>i-i don't know what you're talking about please pretend my posts exist in a vacuum
sorry fudcuck but i dont think you're even capable of 'conciously' telling a believable lie
doesnt matter if you do or dont regardless
the end result is the same
just not gonna sell, fudcuck

[Anonymous No.55202405]

>>55202402
>incoherent ramblings
ok, now what about the "punishment" of LINK on the chart? Do you see it?

[Anonymous No.55202410]

>>55202094
its not hard to time the top, since the cult are always bullish, so it is easy to discount their enthusiasm. You might get liquidate, but im hoping u didnt all in or something

[Anonymous No.55202413]

>>55202405
i see a great buy in point for myself and institutional investors
im just not gonna sell, fudcuck

[Anonymous No.55202420]

>>55202413
sure, but what about the "LINK is being treated differently" part we've been discussing here?
you seem desperate to avoid the main argument here, very weird

[Anonymous No.55202437]

>>55202420
already covered in >>55202347
you don't have a response to it besides "muh high time preference chart" because you probably bought at $50 and angrily fudding is your life now
you seem desperate to push a point that isnt going to affect people who know what link actually is so uh... just not gonna sell fudcuck - sorry

[Anonymous No.55202440]

>>55202386
You are chart blind.
XRP is clearly on an uptrend and down way less, and ADA matches Link's dump level but massively outperformed Link in reaching its ATH.

>>55202405
>>55202420
So you're saying Link hasn't been underperforming vs the market?

[Anonymous No.55202452]

>>55202437
how is LINK different to VET when they have the same chart?
>>55202440
you mean to tell me you don't see the correlation here? lol, the irony of you calling me blind
>So you're saying Link hasn't been underperforming vs the market?
it has been underperfoming the top performers, BTC and ETH, not the entire market
it has been stuck at number 20 for almost 2 years now, this means it is relatively on par with the rest of the market
you really seem dumb desu

[Anonymous No.55202459]

>>55202452
i literally explained how it is different in >>55202347
you are incapable of addressing that because you are clearly posting in bad faith
sorry fudcuck - just not gonna sell

[Anonymous No.55202465]

>>55202459
>bullish news
>fundamentals
>partnerships
I believe every crypto in existence has these things too

[Anonymous No.55202470]

>>55202465
>he's trying to double down
lmao sorry fudcuck - just not gonna sell

[Anonymous No.55202478]

>>55202470
don't sell, but that's completely besides the point here
charts don't lie, and according to the market, LINK's "fundamentals" and "partnerships" are no different than VET's BMW partnership

[Anonymous No.55202481]

>>55202452
>it has been underperfoming the top performers, BTC and ETH, not the entire market
Anon, Chainlink had dropped 6 ranks by the time the entire market peaked, and dropped 10 more ranks since.

[Anonymous No.55202485]

>>55202478
sorry fudcuck, you already lost
just not selling

[Anonymous No.55202488]

>>55202481
and then remained stable at number 20
BCH is a prime example of an underperforming piece of shit, constantly losing ranks for 5 years
LINK is like XRP, completely stable and stagnant
>>55202485
>sorry
it's ok anon

[Anonymous No.55202498]

>>55202488
just not selling
i know its upsetting for you to hear, 10 hours into your shift
sorry

[Anonymous No.55202500]

>>55202478
See
>>55198816
The point of the suppression is to make link’s chart mimic your typical shit coin. It’s been explained how link differs from these shitcoins. You’re retarded.

[Anonymous No.55202501]

>>55202498
not really, but whatever makes you feel better

[Anonymous No.55202503]

>>55202500
oh so now you're claiming that the market DOESN'T treat LINK differently, the suppressors instead aim to make the chart look like every other altcoin out there.
cool, but that completely contradicts what the other anon is claiming

[Anonymous No.55202505]

>>55202500
good lord

[Anonymous No.55202506]

>>55202501
>>55202503
it definitely does upset you though
tell us how to say "i spend all day on biz trying to fud link but cant get anyone to sell" in the language you speak at home

[Anonymous No.55202510]

Funny to see a few late stragglers fudding ITT when a bilateral agreement was reached for no more fud.
I guess it will take a couple of days for word to get around to the last few fudders that aren't keeping up with the news, but after that we're on to 100% shilling, which will be great fun and positive, like the good old days of us all being in this together.

[Anonymous No.55202511]

>>55202503
I am claiming the literal opposite

[Anonymous No.55202519]

>>55202488
>and then remained stable at number 20
Yes, after losing 15 ranks, i.e. severely underperforming against the market.

[Anonymous No.55202520]

>>55202506
you become more unhinged with each passing minute
>>55202511
cool, could be true, IMHO it looks dead and all the narratives of "bullish news" blahblahblah sound like massive bagholder cope
but what is definitely not true, is that perceived "different treatment" LINK is getting from the market, if anything, LINK is literally behaving like your typical 2 cycle altcoin.
>>55202519
anon, it is trading in the same range for more than a year now, it is not underperfoming, it is stable
open your eyes and stop coping

[Anonymous No.55202521]

>>55202519
no more fud, sorry anon. Both sides are fully agreed on this. 100% shill era just started.

[Anonymous No.55202526]

>>55202520
nah i actually enjoy pissing off fuddies
its very easy
just say the magic words
"just not gonna sell sorry, kekfuddie"

[Anonymous No.55202531]

>>55202526
cool story bro lol

[Anonymous No.55202536]

>>55202531
just not selling
sorry, kekfuddie

[Anonymous No.55202542]

>>55202520
>it looks dead
>behaving like your typical 2 cycle altcoin
Yes and we just went over why. Are you brain dead?

[Anonymous No.55202543]

>>55202478
>>55202478
Except they are and you know they are. Its why you put actual partnerships in quotes but left fake ones without a quotation mark border

[Anonymous No.55202566]

>>55202542
sorry for not immediately accepting your unfounded claims of "suppression aimed to mimic a dead altcoin"
it just seems like a reach to me
>>55202543
says who? Chainlink employees?

[Anonymous No.55202580]

>>55198757
Good to see another LINK thread disintegrated into bullshit within a dozen posts.

It's like anons will not countenance anything other than their LINK rapture fantasy where the world finally sees that they are a genius and are given all the world's riches (schizo break from reality)... or LINK was an all-out scam and any suggestion it will ever recover is a psyop (salty burned ex-holders with bad intentions). What about just LINK performed exceptionally pre-bull to the point holders were smug and complacent, it was a great idea that has taken way too long to deliver anything, and will probably have its day again but not in the way it did from 2018-2020?

It won't stay $6 forever. It will outperform BTC through certain periods. On balance, it has strong fundamentals. It's a solid alt. It's not all bleak but surely it's exhausting by now to come up with increasingly less grounded scenarios and theories. Surely it's just not worth all the noise in these threads anymore. But I get it, everyone's bored.

[Anonymous No.55202594]

>>55202580
agreed with almost everything
>It's a solid alt.
in terms of all time performance, it is literally average

[Anonymous No.55202613]

>>55202566
>Swift are CL employees
Bullish

[Anonymous No.55202618]

>>55202580
Gay middle-grounding "link is ok I guess and did well in the past both sides are wrong".

The only thing that has "changed" about Chainlink being the layer zero protocol running in, through and across every single Web2, Web3, permissioned, permissionless and public technology stack, providing collateralised guarantees of data security to every single valuable digital value exchange vertical on the entire planet, is that now we KNOW it is 100% happening, that SWIFT is on board, that DTCC is on board, that Eric Schmidt tells us we're "ahead of all the technologists and economists on this", that Chainlink is hiring the creme de la creme of FAANG, that Dahlia is a fucking genius, that Kemal is beyond brilliant, that Chainlink's shipped products completely devour their niche because they are God tier industry standard products, and that more and more are in the pipeline which, when they launch, will also be God tier industry standard game changing products.

And the only things non-bullish about this entire snowballing network effect monopoly on the most important data transport layer since TCP/IP is that the manipulated price used as by market makers as a signal to retail hasn't gone up, and that it's taking longer than a bunch of ADHD shut-ins (who writhe in agony every day goes by and the universe doesn't deposit infinite riches in their lap) have been demanding from their basements.

[Anonymous No.55202647]

>>55202566
>unfounded claims
There is video evidence itt. You can’t deny that btc dumps on link news/positive price action. All you can do is deny that it is suppression. But if it’s not suppression, what is it? A coincidence?

[Anonymous No.55202648]

>>55202520
>anon, it is trading in the same range for more than a year now, it is not underperfoming
I'm not talking about just the past year, dumbass.

>>55202521
>100% shill era just started.
based.
Weird that it didn't start four years ago, the one saving grace of this shitty site is supposed to be its contrarianism.

[Anonymous No.55202651]

>>55202594
Solid and average basically mean the same thing in this context

[Anonymous No.55202656]

>>55202647
>if it’s not suppression, what is it? A coincidence?
A recurring and predictable pattern of coincidences, yes.

[Anonymous No.55202666]

>https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=87393&page=1
You miseryfags would've sold AMZN
You DEFINITELY would have sold Bitcoin
There's a reason only a very small cohort of people make it really big from early, world changing investments and that is either because they are insiders or luckily positioned (90% of them), or they are a very rare breed of incredibly astute, rational, almost irrationally low time preference autistic geniuses and let me say I am proud as fucking punch to have found a few others of the latter who are like me and who locked arms with me to figure this shit out, buy it in bulk, and then hold it for literally however long it takes until

Chainlink
Oracles
Power
Everything

[Anonymous No.55202679]

>>55202613
like I said, according to the market at least, this means nothing.
>we KNOW it is 100% happening
???
>appeal to authority
>Chainlink's shipped products completely devour their niche
lol, you mean the beta Keepers, VRF etc?
anon, I got some bad news for you...
>if you believe than a 6 year old altcoin stagnating for almost half it's lifespan without managing to solidify its spot on the top 5 is unacceptable, you have low-time preference
I do not agree with this sentiment, sorry.
>>55202647
a 2 minute cherry-picked video with no broader context regarding similar altcoin behavior in the same timespan hardly constitutes as "evidence". Make a new video which includes at least the entire top 25, in order to establish that this BTC behavior is exclusive to LINK.

[Anonymous No.55202681]

>>55202618
As people have pointed out already, LINK is at $6. You need to have some wiggle-room with your thesis if you want people to take you seriously. You can call it "gay middlegrounding" to have anything short of 100% conviction that LINK will revolutionise the world but it's objectively nuts right now because it's simply too far away. That's the point here. The tribalism is low iq at best.

[Anonymous No.55202693]

>>55202651
touché
>>55202681
/thread

[Anonymous No.55202697]

>>55202656
>it’s a coincidence that this exact phenomenon plays out, not at random intervals or moments, but specifically when link has positive news and/or hits specific price points
Lmao ok

[Anonymous No.55202701]

>>55202681
>And the only things non-bullish about this entire snowballing network effect monopoly on the most important data transport layer since TCP/IP is that the manipulated price used as by market makers as a signal to retail hasn't gone up...

[Anonymous No.55202707]

>>55202679
This argument has been going on for years. Not one person has ever provided an example of this happening to a token/coin that isn’t link

[Anonymous No.55202710]

>>55202697
we get it, most people know the market is manipulated, but u still havent answer why the token is needed

[Anonymous No.55202722]

>>55202697
your tribalism has blinded you, that anon is a prominent CL advocate and his post is ironic
kek, the absolute state of deranged linkies
>>55202707
no one has really tried, since anyone concerned with this theory is hyper focused on LINK and fails to escape his bubble in order to objectively assess LINK's performance against the broader alt market
try researching it yourself, this video will only appeal to people already sharing this sentiment, it won't convince anybody else.

[Anonymous No.55202729]

>>55202679
>with no broader context
The broader context is this: bullish thing happens for Chainlin, Bitcoin dumps

[Anonymous No.55202730]

>>55202701
minor correction, this fabled "snowballing network effect monopoly" isn't even close to becoming reality yet
that's what the other anon is saying, the price is the cherry on top

[Anonymous No.55202739]

>>55202681
The middle ground right now would be Link being ranked somewhere between rank 4 and rank 8.

[Anonymous No.55202743]

>>55202729
and this statement is unfounded until you establish this being unique to LINK only, if you don't present the behavior of other altcoins at the same exact time, or at times they have their own breakouts
>>55202739
said every altcoin holder about his altcoin, ever!

[Anonymous No.55202745]

>>55202730
If you had to come up with a third thing to talk about that wasn't "price is bad" or "taking too long", what would it be?

[Anonymous No.55202764]

>>55202743
>until you establish this being unique to LINK only
See pic.
This never happens for Chainlink.

>said every altcoin holder about his altcoin, ever!
Chainlink has been the absolute basis of Defi for a long time now. It's the motor behind the third big crypto paradigm:
1) transactions (BTC)
2) smart contracts (ETH)
3) Defi (Chainlink)

[Anonymous No.55202769]

>>55202745
lack of products, feature creep, paper launches, questionable recruitment (twitter personas whom turn against the long term community, green haired dykes, Jonny Huxtable), shitcanned sales department, failure of other advertised enterprise grade IRL use cases (OpenLaw, DA, BSN, Korean Banks, Oracle)
really, when you think about it, the only thing that's left is SWIFT, that's a massive disappointment compared to 2018's breadcrumbs.
>>55202764
see
>>55202743
>this statement is unfounded until you establish this being unique to LINK only

[Anonymous No.55202782]

>>55202769
I gave you an example of something that never happens: Bitcoin pumping on Link news (without dumping immediately after). That in itself is telling.
And then there are tons of examples of Bitcoin dumping on Link news/pumps. Not always, but the vast majority of the time.
There may be SOME examples of Bitcoin dumping on other coins' news, but those are rare.

[Anonymous No.55202789]

>>55202782
then what happened in 2019? why did Bitcoin allow LINK to breakout to almost $5? did BTC fall asleep that time?
anyway, like I said already
>this statement is unfounded until you establish this being unique to LINK only
go on, anon, you have a lot of research to do and lots of charts to screencap

[Anonymous No.55202802]

>>55202769
>lack of products, feature creep, paper launches
is just "taking too long" rephrased
>questionable recruitment... Jonny
oh you're a burned LPL fag. why am i not surprised at all. lmao
>failure of other advertised enterprise grade IRL use cases (OpenLaw, DA, BSN, Korean Banks, Oracle)
Also just "taking too long" rephrased. There is literally zero reason to think any of these entities won't use chainlink, or will use a (nonexistent) Chainlink competitor once the tech stack is ready.

So tl;dr of your 25pbtid waffling is "i got burned on LPL, chainlink price is low and it's taking too long and I'm sad"
Take up woodworking or something.

[Anonymous No.55202810]

>>55202789
>what happened in 2019? why did Bitcoin allow LINK to breakout to almost $5?
Bitcoin was working overtime to keep Link under $4 back then, pic related.
Link finally broke out and was a hair away from $5, and then covid dropped just in the nick of time.

>>this statement is unfounded until you establish this being unique to LINK only
Here's a little lesson in basic logic for you: even if you found evidence of Bitcoin instadumping on all news for all other alts, it would not change the fact that Bitcoin instadumps on all Link news.

[Anonymous No.55202817]

>>55202769
>lack of products, feature creep, paper launches
ADA, ETH, XRP, ... did the same but way worse.

[Anonymous No.55202820]

Marines...

Let us pray.

Lord oh we do walk through the shadowfork fud but I do not fear

My bags are heavy but faith is strong

Chainlinkgod shalt rescue us from the brink with a new hot take to explain why things are so bad click below (1/777)

Lord please offer our fuddies mercy and give me the strength to turn the other cheek

amen

[Anonymous No.55202826]

>>55202802
>dismisses everything as "taking too long" whining
convenient and disingenuous
>oh you're a burned LPL fag
nice projection, I'm not but what are you implying here? That you should be fine with Jonny being on the teamas long as you didn't get burned on LPL? wtf?
>There is literally zero reason to think any of these entities won't use chainlink
anon, Oracle has been dropped, DA has been dropped officially, they flat out publicly announced their blockchain pilot was a failure, OpenLaw has been radio silent for more than 3 years, if you think any of these entities are still in play you are beyond delusional at this point
>>55202810
>it would not change the fact that Bitcoin instadumps on all Link news
yes but it would also disprove the "LINK suppression" theory, are you dumb? go on, do the research
>>55202817
and that's why the market is treating LINK similarly? lmao

[Anonymous No.55202846]

>>55202722
Why dont you try it? I just did and couldn't find any other altcoins where BTC dumps within 24 hours of bullish news at a greater than 51% success rate.
Looks like Link is very, very special.

[Anonymous No.55202858]

>>55202826
>it would also disprove the "LINK suppression" theory
No, it would not.
All it would mean is that Bitcoin is not just suppressing Link, but also all other coins.

You're just not very smart.

>that's why the market is treating LINK similarly
Haha yes, similarly. See pic.

[Anonymous No.55202867]

>>55202846
>I just did
why are you lying? this video is showing 5-10m charts, do you mean to tell me you combed the entire top 20-30 on their 5-10m charts on days they have had some major announcement or breakout? come on, stop being a lazy tard and put the work
>>55202858
>All it would mean is that Bitcoin is not just suppressing Link, but also all other coins.
which directly implies there is no grand suppression against LINK specifically
lol
>See pic
do you realize that XRP currently is trading at the same price it did back in 2018? is that your measure of "outperformance"? Jesus dude, you really need to venture outside your LINK bubble, not even jk

[Anonymous No.55202874]

>>55202826
So if those entities don't even exist any more you think that's a hit against Chainlink? Because Chainlink partnered with other things and the other things didn't pan out, that's a hit against Chainlink?
Chainlink will power everything. Everything that works will use Chainlink. This does not lead to "Everything that partners with Chainlink will succeed" and it's such a retarded point to try and make that I am actually mystified.

[Anonymous No.55202877]

>>55202874
These entities do exist, their LINK "partnership" does not
what the fuck is wrong with your brain?

[Anonymous No.55202881]

>>55202867
>which directly implies there is no grand suppression against LINK
It directly implies suppression against Link.

>is that your measure of "outperformance"?
XRP outperformed Link during the timeframe when:
1) XRP got sued by the SEC
2) Link completely took over crypto
3) XRP dumped more tokens in dollar amount than Sergey

That's monumental.

[Anonymous No.55202882]

I guess the metapsychology of this is some version of "misery loves company" where a self loathing link fudder just makes increasingly retarded arguments in the belief that, if he can make other link holders exasperated, it will somehow lessen his own burden.
Does that work, though? At all?

[Anonymous No.55202890]

>>55202877
>muh fake partnerships
What is this, 2019?

[Anonymous No.55202891]

>>55202877
>Digital Asset's pilot failed
>So Chainlink is bad
>Even thought the pilot failing was never attributed to Chainlink in any way

[Anonymous No.55202920]

>>55202881
>dude trust me dude, it outperformed11
anon, what are you even trying to prove here, lmao
at one point LINK and XRP were trading at the same price, keep harping on about a x2 when LINK absolutely mogged XRP for 3 years
>>55202890
they weren't fake, they were failed
big difference
>>55202891
>one of chainlink's advertised IRL usecases was a fluke
>that's not chainlink's fault
it literally said that they didn't find blockchain tech useful for their specific usecase
anon, you're being in denial right now, but it's ok
btw, were are all these fabled fudders itt? so far all I'm getting is desperate shills trying to correct the record with extreme gaslighting techniques kek

[Anonymous No.55202923]

>>55202867
Im not, you're not the first person to ask this. Ive done it. Now its your turn. Provide me an EQUAL number of instances where a SINGLE alt coin releases bullish news and sees a btc dump of equal or greater percent to the link examples. You wont because yu cant because you are wrong and I am right. Link is special and link is suppressed.

[Anonymous No.55202927]

>>55202923
I'm not interested at disproving your theory, all I'm saying is that your evidence is insufficient if you're aiming on convincing others
just some food for thought

[Anonymous No.55202934]

>>55202920
>unless literally 100% of Chainlink's integrations and pilots across thousands of entities is a success, then Chainlink is a failure
I guess we just have different standards, anon. Mine, for example, are not a fucking retarded high bar of perfection.

[Anonymous No.55202935]

>>55202920
You don't have to trust me, just look at this pic: >>55202858

The fact that XRP outperformed Link during the past two years is absolutely, completely insane.

[Anonymous No.55202940]

>>55202934
>guess we just have different standards
Indeed anon, all of pilots have been dropped apart from SWIFT, that's shit
>>55202935
anon, XRP entered the bull at rank 2, it is currently 5 ranks below that.
sure, it might have performed slightly better than LINK these past couple of years, but in the grand scheme of things it is flat
completely flat
stop coping, it hasn't outperformed anything

[Anonymous No.55202944]

>>55202927
Nice projection. Anyone who is curious is free to do what I have. When they do they will see why you pretend to not be interested in disproving a "theory" that you have spent a few posts trying to hand-wave away, which is to say they will see it cannot be done because I am right and you are wrong. Link is special. The burden is on you to support your claim that the suppression ready shown applies to other tokens. We proved it for link. Food for thought.

[Anonymous No.55202947]

>>55202920
>they weren't fake, they were failed
By that logic Ethereum failed even harder with the EEA.

[Anonymous No.55202949]

>>55202940
>sure, it might have performed slightly better than LINK these past couple of years
"Slightly" he says lmao.
XRP doubled in price, while Link halved.

[Anonymous No.55202950]

>>55202944
Already shown*
And again, you'll need to prove it happens to the same extent and frequency we've demonstrated it happens with chainlink if you want your argument to be sturdy.

[Anonymous No.55202951]

>>55202927
As someone else said, this argument has been ongoing for years and no one has posted the evidence you are suggesting. Not because they haven’t looked, but because it doesn’t exist

[Anonymous No.55202959]

>>55202944
>>55202951
He's gonna post a chart of various coins overlapping, and pretend that proves that Bitcoin dumps on other coins' news too.

[Anonymous No.55202961]

>>55202927
>interested at
Nice esl you nigger. Why are you 'arguing' in circles if you don't care about disproving anything you disingenuous little weasel.

[Anonymous No.55202970]

>>55202944
>>55202950
>Nice projection
what projection? I'm not convinced, and judging from the view count, not a lot of people have been convinced or exposed to it either.
>>55202947
https://news.nab.com.au/news/nab-completes-world-first-with-cross-border-stablecoin-transaction/
seems fine to me
>>55202951
have you looked? I've seen XMR and ROSE shills constantly complain about suppression as well for example, perhaps you should look into that.
>>55202961
>ESL!11!
nice ad hom, anon.
>Why are you 'arguing' in circles
you should ask your friends itt, I'm not the one constantly invoking circular reasoning to everything and grasping at straws with meaningless arguments

[Anonymous No.55202971]

>>55202959
Kek like the ltc chart. If actual evidence did exist, the rudders would have a field day spamming it every time suppression is brought up

[Anonymous No.55202974]

>>55202959
He's going to need to also post the bullish news that corresponds to each dump for those shitcoins and he won't be abme to do so. He will look like an idiot in the very thread he spent so much time fudding. Too risky.

[Anonymous No.55202978]

>>55202974
you are the one claiming this is evidence of suppression, the burden of proof is on you

[Anonymous No.55202999]

>>55202970
The projection is your suggestion that there hasnt been enough evidence provided to suggest link is suppressed by btc dumps. Your counter argument to the evidence is "that happens with other coins/tokens" yet you fail to provide any supporting evidence of this claim. That is why it is projection when you deny evidence provided for link and refuse to provide your own for the shit coins you claim this happens with. Link is special. We all know it. Are you really working for a paycheck with this or are you just bored? Even if you lost your stack and struggle in neetbux you could have soent these past few months working up to 100 link. You know that will be enough in the end. But you're here fudding. Why? Are you a truly immoral creature trying to convince folks theyre about to cross into hell shouting at them from right outside the pearly gates of heaven? Youre either a demon, an angry idiot, or some poor sap selling your soul.

[Anonymous No.55203002]

>>55202978
There is plenty of proof in this thread. Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.55203003]

>>55202970
>https://news.nab.com.au/news/nab-completes-world-first-with-cross-border-stablecoin-transaction/
One measly trial after six years. And it’s not even remotely related to the EEA.

[Anonymous No.55203005]

>>55202978
It was posted already. Its a youtube search away if you need a compilation.
https://youtu.be/8nEPWUFgfvk

[Anonymous No.55203008]

>>55202940
>31 posts from a liar pretending that link has no substatial achievements, comparable to random and irrelevant shitcoins based on a chart in a vacuum
This is your brain on top buying and excessive amounts of porn.
What fucking failures these FUD trannies are lel. Always keep accumulating folks, and always antagonize them by making sure they know their efforts are wasted.

[Anonymous No.55203019]

>>55202999
>Your counter argument to the evidence is "that happens with other coins/tokens"
that's not my counter argument, that's my suggestion for actually supporting your claim with hard evidence and improving upon this old ass cherry picked video that proves nothing by itself.
the rest of your post is pure garbage, sorry
>>55203003
as opposed to what? two measly PoCs in a span of 7 years? lol ok
>>55203005
I know, I already mentioned the view count
>>55203008
oh would you look at that, another shill desperately trying to gaslight, where are all the fudders today man?!

[Anonymous No.55203030]

>>55203019
>compares all of the EEA for Eth to just Swift for Link

Much good faith argument, wow

[Anonymous No.55203033]

>>55203030
not my fault that all of the other LINK pilots failed, which is my point

[Anonymous No.55203041]

>>55203033
All of the EEA failed too, but you didn’t mention that.

[Anonymous No.55203049]

>>55203041
afaik the EEA still funds and backs ETH so yeah, looks like it's doing alright, but thanks for conceding that LINK has lost all of its meaningful IRL connections revealed here years ago

[Anonymous No.55203052]

https://twitter.com/solangegueiros/status/1666009094442852352
Very based and redpilled frens. I wonder if the deaf are as good at smart contracts as the blind were at phreaking back in the day?

Praise Jesus we have a weaner!

[Anonymous No.55203060]

>>55203049
>EEA has zero institutional traction
>”the EEA is doing alright”

>Link is actively working with numerous corporate and institutional players
>”Link failed”

Much wow

[Anonymous No.55203073]

I really really REALLY dont understand why you twittertards insist on having your automated spam bot debate over and over again on this site. I mean the nuance is just incredibly realistic and the reposts will make you incredibly famous on twitter im sure. maybe musk will give you a blowjob? who knows the world is a strange place and this is the future!

[Anonymous No.55203080]

>>55203060
what?
LINK's PoC precedes ETH's trial by 6 months, at the very least, the EEA has the same institutional adoption as Chainlink

[Anonymous No.55203095]

>>55203080
>a single trial by parties who are not the EEA means the EEA is doing fine

>one Australian bank is the same as Swift

Haha what

[Anonymous No.55203097]

>>55203019
>that's not my counter argument
You quite literally said that if Bitcoin dumped on all other coins' news, that "directly implies there is no grand suppression against LINK specifically".
So go ahead, prove your thesis that Bitcoin dumps on all other coins' news.

Linkers have provided more than enough proof of Bitcoin dumping on Link news.

[Anonymous No.55203101]

>>55202580
There is no such thing as a "solid altcoin".
There is zero fundamental value in the whole altcoin space.
Its one big casino isolated from the rest of the world.
The Ccip Swift stuff you're waiting for is made up to sell more tokens into the cult.
The only use case of blockchain is digital gold. Hold BTC you fucking degenerates.

[Anonymous No.55203103]

>>55203019
>y-you're desperate to gaslight!
Sure thing mr "34 posts about a token which is apparently unremarkable"
Just go spam the catalog with cuck shit youre better at that

[Anonymous No.55203111]

>>55203095
now let's see LINK's banking pilots ;)
wtf are we even talking about here though? the very members of EEA are literally legacy enterprises, the EEA is the definition of enterprise institutional adoption.
>>55203097
yes but that's not my thesis, I was responding to your own hypothetical.
>even if you found evidence of Bitcoin instadumping on all news for all other alts
>>55203103
it is unremarkable, the only thing keeping it alive is the constant shitposting of holders on this board

[Anonymous No.55203130]

>>55203111
>now let's see LINK's banking pilots ;)
Let’s see the EEA’s first

[Anonymous No.55203137]

>>55203130
>LINK's pilots were a dud
>b-b-b-but muh ETH reeeeeeee
lol
btw, there's an ETH banking pilot over there>>55202970

[Anonymous No.55203142]

>>55203137
And if that one pilot fails then the EEA is a failure, right?

[Anonymous No.55203150]

>>55203137
>NOOOOO HOW DARE YOU USE MY LOGIC AGAINST COINS OTHER THAN LINK???????

[Anonymous No.55203162]

>>55203142
after so many years? yeah? but if the EEA members want to continue pouring money down the drain, who am I to disagree with them? right?

[Anonymous No.55203167]

>>55203150
your logic is literally deflect and steer the attention away from Chainlink's objective failures? cool anon

[Anonymous No.55203169]

>>55203111
Your thesis is that Bitcoin dumping on Link news does not mean Link is being suppressed, because Bitcoin does the same to other coins.

This means you have to prove that Bitcoin does in fact do this to other coins. Post a few dozen instances of Bitcoin dumping in response to news for other coins.
(btw, even if you could do this, it still would not mean Link is not being suppressed)

[Anonymous No.55203174]

>>55203169
that's not my thesis
your circular reasoning is tiresome

[Anonymous No.55203176]

>>55203167
>IF YOU APPLY MY LOGIC TO ANYTHING OTHER THAN LINK THAT’S CHEATING

[Anonymous No.55203179]

>>55203162
>if one pilot fails the whole project is a failure
fuck I better alert literally every single major company that has had projects or integrations fail in the pilot or incubator start that they are in fact all failures and should close up shop immediately.

[Anonymous No.55203183]

>>55203174
>that's not my thesis

This you bro:
>>55202743
>this statement is unfounded until you establish this being unique to LINK only

[Anonymous No.55203187]

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-explores-blockchain-interoperability-remove-friction-tokenised-asset-settlement
chainlink mentioned you can stop this gpt chat posting plebs

[Anonymous No.55203193]

>>55203176
lol, you're basically screaming into the void actually
What does EEA have to do with LINK's pilots failing? How is it relevant?
>>55203179
nice shitposting
>>55203183
yes, which means that most people won't be convinced about YOUR thesis until you can provide that kind of evidence.
I'm not interested IN* doing that at all, sorry

[Anonymous No.55203200]

>>55203193
You're the one making the case that if a company attempts a pilot, integration or partnership and if a single one of those things fail, even out of the thousands fo things they are doing, the whole company is a failure.
It's a wild call, anon, but you made it then stuck by it.

[Anonymous No.55203210]

>>55198769
Look up 'Blind Digital signatures' 1996 and X-cash 1998

[Anonymous No.55203219]

>>55203200
I've never said that the whole company is not a failure, but it is a failure regardless, EEA aims for institutional adoption so yeah, it would have failed in that regard
don't twist my arguments with hyperbole

[Anonymous No.55203227]

>>55203187
here we go lol

>>55203193
>until you can provide that kind of evidence
Even if you definitively prove that Bitcoin dumps on all coins' news, it does not change the simple fact that Bitcoin dumps on all Chainlink news.

[Anonymous No.55203232]

>Chainlink will be used as an enterprise abstraction layer to securely connect the Swift network to the Ethereum Sepolia network, while Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) will enable complete interoperability between the source and destination blockchains.

[Anonymous No.55203236]

>>55203227
>Even if you definitively prove that Bitcoin dumps on all coins' news, it does not change the simple fact that Bitcoin dumps on all Chainlink news.
cool but more people will be convinced if you do so
are you retarded? why are we still having this convo?

[Anonymous No.55203238]

>>55202666
>Incredibly astute, rational, almost irrationally low time preference autistic geniuses

Checked and literally me pilled

[Anonymous No.55203239]

>In a new set of experiments, we will collaborate with more than a dozen major financial institutions and FMIs including Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ), BNP Paribas, BNY Mellon, Citi, Clearstream, Euroclear, Lloyds Banking Group, SIX Digital Exchange (SDX) and The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) – to test how firms can leverage their existing Swift infrastructure to efficiently instruct the transfer of tokenised value over a range of public and private blockchain networks. Chainlink, a leading Web3 services platform, will provide connectivity across public and private blockchains for these experiments.

[Anonymous No.55203242]

>>55203236
You said that if Bitcoin dumps on other coins' news, that means it's "unfounded" to say that Bitcoin dumps on Link news.

Which is logically bunk.

[Anonymous No.55203255]

>“We’re excited to work with Swift. It’s clear that as banks endeavor to access multiple blockchains, a common connectivity layer across the various chains will be a critical building block for their adoption of on-chain finance,” said Sergey Nazarov, Co-Founder of Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.55203256]

>>55203242
it is unfounded to say that there is a suppression conspiracy solely revolving around LINK, and I stand by that statement
this argument is pointless

[Anonymous No.55203259]

>>55203239

[Anonymous No.55203266]

>>55203256
>it is unfounded to say that there is a suppression conspiracy solely revolving around LINK
That's not what I said in the post to which you were replying lmao
All I said was that Bitcoin dumps whenever big news drops for Chainlink. Nothing about "solely".

[Anonymous No.55203276]

>>55203266
then why are you still arguing with me if we're in agreement?

[Anonymous No.55203287]

>>55202882
Just imagine the kind of life a fud tranny leads.

I challange any fudcuck to post a picture of their hand with a time stamp, they never will.

[Anonymous No.55203291]

>>55203276
We're not in agreement lol

[Anonymous No.55203296]

>>55203291
ok you've lost me then cause I have no fucking clue what you're even arguing for

[Anonymous No.55203305]

>>55203296
I said Bitcoin dumps whenever Link gets big news.

You said this is "unfounded" if Link is not unique in this respect. Which is illogical.

[Anonymous No.55203327]

>>55203305
I was referring to the grand suppression conspiracy theory being unfounded, since it would turn out it exists for other alts as well. Do you disagree?

[Anonymous No.55203333]

>>55203327
>I was referring to the grand suppression conspiracy theory being unfounded
Which means you have to prove that Chainlink is not unique.

All I said was that Bitcoin dumps on Link news.
Like right now.

[Anonymous No.55203349]

>>55203333
>Which means you have to prove that Chainlink is not unique.
yes, (You) have to prove that since you claim this suppression is exclusive to LINK
duh
right now the entire market is reacting badly to the Binance-SEC news, LINK had no momentum to begin with, there was no "attempted breakout" per suppression theory.

[Anonymous No.55203361]

>>55203349
>(You) have to prove that since you claim this suppression is exclusive to LINK
You can't prove a negative.

Your claim is that Link is not unique, so you have to prove that Bitcoin dumps with great regularity on other coins' news.

[Anonymous No.55203367]

>>55203361
I don't claim that bro ffs, I'm saying that IF you want your theory to become convincing you must include other alts
simple as

[Anonymous No.55203368]

>>55203333
checked and absolutely maniac pilled
i for one accept btc as king shitcoin and you chat gpt guys are ok in my book even if you throw the same ideas around for years verbatim as if they have the same weight ad nauseum

[Anonymous No.55203374]

>>55198769
sunken cost

[Anonymous No.55203384]

>>55203367
>I don't claim that bro
Then we're in agreement that Chainlink is in fact unique, until someone provides proof to the contrary.

In any case, it's well established that Bitcoin dumps on Link news.

[Anonymous No.55203406]

>>55203384
cool, but somehow, the longterm chart prints the same as VET
truly a mystery
aand we're back on square one
>Bitcoin dumps on Link news
cool, but it didn't do so today, the SEC news preceded the SWIFT blogpost

[Anonymous No.55203416]

>>55203361
>You can't prove a negative.
umm hello niggers didnt you ever take one of those covid pcr tests???

[Anonymous No.55203425]

>>55203367
there's a strange man in my house
>are there men in every other house?
i don't know, but there's a strange man in my house right now
>until you can prove that there aren't strange men in every house, your suggestion that there is a strange man in your house has no meaning.

[Anonymous No.55203430]

protip i never did
if this hole chainshit scam doesnt pan out i will sell my unvaxxxxxxxed sperm and make quadrillions

[Anonymous No.55203446]

bros women will be lining up to pay quadrillions for my sperm its the future and its organic tech / low tech in the war against bill gates brand soya bots from the the rainbow alliance

[Anonymous No.55203447]

>>55203425
keep talking to yourself, the truth is nobody outside of the chainlink community will give a shit until someone presents serious evidence of suppression
the video is 2 years old and is filled with /bi/z memes and has less views than LINK wallets staked, nobody gives a fuck outside of /biz/ and the twitter shills

[Anonymous No.55203463]

>>55203406
>cool, but it didn't do so today, the SEC news preceded the SWIFT blogpost
Fact is that Bitcoin is dumping hard, in the immediate context of major Chainlink news.
A lot of people are involved in this; including over a dozen banks. Someone is bound to be tipped off.

[Anonymous No.55203465]

>>55203447
yea sad but true bro they need to pay shills to wake up the chinks n pajeets. hope based cz does us a solid over in chynatown hooya

[Anonymous No.55203497]

fact the average villager in mumbai is willing to invest billions in indian curry units and all you can do is post chat gpt output n seeth

[Anonymous No.55203526]

>>55203447
Ah so the goalposts are now "nobody cares". Thanks for the concession. :)

[Anonymous No.55203534]

chainlink twitter posted first then swift based marketing effort by tbarr cmo
i liek the moniker linktheworld capital markets blockchain very cool man
hope someone out there gives a fuck kek

[Anonymous No.55203544]

>>55203463
>Fact is that Bitcoin is dumping hard
it has been dumping hard since yesterday, which completely demolishes your claim about "dumping on LINK news", unless you claim that this is just the pretext from some insider pre dumping BTC in anticipation for SWIFT news!
>A lot of people are involved in this; including over a dozen banks. Someone is bound to be tipped off.
yep, you went off the deep end
sad, many such cases
>>55203526
that's the crux of my argument you retard, evidence is insufficient therefore people don't care

[Anonymous No.55203548]

>>55203526
I pray erryday someone does bro

[Anonymous No.55203591]

>>55203544
>it has been dumping hard since yesterday, which completely demolishes your claim about "dumping on LINK news"
Even if this is actually a coincidence, it doesn't change the fact that Link would've pumped if not for this SEC business right around the time of this Swift news.

[Anonymous No.55203597]

>>55203591
>would have
k

[Anonymous No.55203610]

>>55203544
So I do actually need to determine how many strange men are in other houses before I can report on whether there is a strange man in my house?

[Anonymous No.55203615]

>>55203591
intentional timing. this is to be expected. clarity will come. order out of chaos

[Anonymous No.55203623]

>>55203597
That's exactly the point.
Chainlink has literal years of massive news that was never priced in because of events like this.

[Anonymous No.55203657]

>>55203610
unlike houses, you can determine how many strange men are or aren't suppressing other tokens by carefully examining their charts and their own news, before claiming that your token is the sole target of suppression because you obsess daily over its chart, completely oblivious to what happens to the rest of the market
>>55203623
or, hear me out, the news aren't nearly as massive as you think

[Anonymous No.55203670]

>>55203623
>>55203657
its crazy how these two ids only reply to each other with banal filler you fags must be on the clock

[Anonymous No.55203672]

>>55203657
>the news aren't nearly as massive as you think

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

[Anonymous No.55203686]

>>55203672
what came out of this and how did it affect the actual adoption of the protocol?
but really, what's the point of dealing with what ifs? this argument is also pointless and I'm not going to bother responding to your repetitive, nuanced, derailing shitposts any longer
let's just agree to disagree and move on

[Anonymous No.55203696]

>>55203670
I noticed that too, he won't get off my dick

[Anonymous No.55203703]

>>55203686
>this argument is also pointless and I'm not going to bother responding
the final cry of the absolutely BTFO retard.
Sucks to be you, man, you were doing OK and halfway through your FUD thread we got the most bullish confirmation in LINK history.

[Anonymous No.55203710]

>58 posts by this id

[Anonymous No.55203718]

>>55203657
>or, hear me out, the news aren't nearly as massive as you think
this

>>55203672
tnn

[Anonymous No.55203724]

>>55203703
is this (You) on a different id? I was referring to that poster specifically, not (You)
why did you avoid replying to this?>>55203657
>55203657

[Anonymous No.55203783]

>>55203686
Imagine trying to pilpul away Swift adoption, just imagine the level of mental instability this requires.

>59 pbtid
Because of course

[Anonymous No.55203804]

>>55203008
Absolutely based.
>>55203019
You're a disingenuous baby (maybe 115-125 iq) but you've managed to post 54 times in this thread and not one of them contained one of the hundreds of photos of muscular naked black man you have saved on your computer, so thank you for that at least.

[Anonymous No.55203835]

>>55203724
>59 posts by this ID

Good little fud cuck racking up lots of rupees. Post a timestamp of your hand or else you are forever a pajeet.

[Anonymous No.55203850]

>55203296
Now up to 59 posts over several hours trying to fud chainlink... just repeating the same shit over and over despite his arguments being completely shot down since the start
Sorry kekfuddie. Just not gonna sell!

[Anonymous No.55203859]

>Imagine trying to pilpul away Swift adoption
2017 called, wants it's maymay back
7 years and all you got was 2 PoCs, couple of blogposts, and 2 video chats featuring Serg saying the same shit, but suure this time it's different!
>muh pbtid
unlike (You), I don't constantly switch ids you astroturfing rejects
>muh every naysayer is the same person
you're literally in a bubble
keep drinking the kool-aid fellas

[Anonymous No.55203867]

>>55203623
and it never will be
pathetic deluded stinkie

[Anonymous No.55203877]

>>55203227
>experiments

[Anonymous No.55203878]

BROS BROS! RIPPLE JUST ANNOUNCED A PARTNERSHIP WITH SWIFT COMMUNITY!
NOTHING HAS BEEN BUILT YET. THEY ARE JUST EXPERIMENTING.

[Anonymous No.55203977]

>>55203859
I havent switched ids though? Ive come back after dinner.
Your arguments have been shut down and youre apparently 60 posts in to trying to get people to sell now, flailing and desperate.

Its like a shareblue poster wandered in from pol and decided to try and fud link. Quantity =/= quality. You are incapable of giving anyone a reason to sell that actually makes sense. I hope this isn't your day job, lmfao.

Just
Not
Gonna
Sell

[Anonymous No.55204010]

>>55203804
A bit generous with the iq, 105-110 tops, midwit tier

[Anonymous No.55204071]

Link culties have hit a new low. To summarize, now the claim is that Btc dipped because Link had “imminent” news about some vaporware theyve been hyping for years.

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHSHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Chainlink, THE cuckolds of crypto

[Anonymous No.55204104]

>>55203977
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude we fought le HECKIN consthhhhpirathy on our mongolian image board!!!

>HODL marinesssssthhhh!!!

>w w we’re da next amazon!!!!!!

Gamestop, power to the players

[Anonymous No.55204134]

>>55204104
Duuuuuude-poster is Michael the Chink aka Uncle Oldfag aka Schiff Will Win
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/43747787/
https://www.reddit.com/user/ANStoTheMoon/


This absolute loser has been 'predicting' chainlink price action wrong since 2018 while holding NEO bags himself lmao. ANStoTheMoon indeed, bottom feeder chink midwit poorfaggot that he is he can't let go and obsessively posts about LINK with and without a trip on.

[Anonymous No.55204219]

>>55204104
>>55204071
too emotional. ngmi

[Anonymous No.55204244]

Wasn’t there a Google partnership Link was supposed to have?
What happened with that?

[Anonymous No.55204264]

>>55204244
> https://medium.com/google-cloud/on-chain-web3-marketing-with-google-and-chainlink-ca37dcb83f94
Humming along very nicely

[Anonymous No.55204287]

but its not being suppressed right

[Anonymous No.55204292]

>>55204104
Yoooooooo MIKE! How you been my guy? Haven’t seen your online persona in weeks then you turn up in the day of the SWIFT news! Welcome back big boy!
SWIFT partnering with NASH exchange what a time to be alive, huh?

[Anonymous No.55204302]

>>55198757
Literally every time. But this time they are doing black swan tier fud to suppress chain links mega bullish news

[Anonymous No.55204431]

>>55204071
>>55204104
Absolutely SEETHING lmao
You should go ahead and make 60 posts like the other cuck obsessed with my investments and then maybe ill think about selling for a single picosecond... before deciding
Just not gonna sell
Sorry kekfuddie

[Anonymous No.55204457]

>>55204264
So, why is link still $6?
Is this partnership just the use of Google Cloud and some data services? I don’t see all of Google running off of Chainlink in this document. Well I must be dumb as this says partnership, and that has to mean something deeper than simply two entities collaborating on a business-to-business basis that doesn’t involve shared control of companies with partners, with examples such as advertisers, publishers, affiliate agencies, ad tech vendors, and industry organizations.
Nah, it has to be more than that. They’re partners.

[Anonymous No.55204535]

>>55204457
Partners in crime.

[Anonymous No.55204904]

>>55204134
>internet sleuth, badge number #1337 reporting for duty sirsss!!!!

>>55204219
you were crying as you wrote this

>>55204244
the partnership is Sergey going to google.com and searching big mac recipes...They also have a "partnership" with amazon aka they have a team account to buy stuff

>>55204292
yoooooooooooooooo. I have no idea what NASH exchange is and neither does anyone else. But I do know it will do nothing for Link price

>>55204431
>Just not gonna sell

Please don't.


>>55204457
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude it's a SECRET!!!!!
BAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH, wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo I love this crowd!!!!

[Anonymous No.55204940]

>>55204904
>the partnership is Sergey going to google.com and searching big mac recipes...They also have a "partnership" with amazon aka they have a team account to buy stuff
kek ok you're alright

[Anonymous No.55204950]

>>55204904
>triggered ranting
Wow you seem upset kekfuddie
Sorry but im not reading that
Just not selling either

[Anonymous No.55204956]

>>55204904
I was being facetious.
Obviously it’s fucking nothing.

[Anonymous No.55205001]

>>55204457
>anon answers his question
>WELL UMM WHAT ABOUT THE CHART THEN? I WAS WRONG AND I KNOW THERES SUPPRESSION BUT MUH CHART
Lmao you clowns are making the 60 pbtid fuddie look like a genius at this point
Keep going. You have a lot of catching up to do
(Answer will always be not selling though)

[Anonymous No.55205325]

>>55205001
Don’t worry, your coin is so great that it will get suppressed to nothing because it can’t escape on its own merits but has to follow btc slavishly.
I totally want to buy this coin that gets suppressed for years. It looks so appealing.

[Anonymous No.55205408]

>checks price
Oh no no no!

[Anonymous No.55205571]

>>55202739
Honestly, that would be a failure.

[Anonymous No.55205631]

>>55205325
>>55205408
Yawn
Not doing very good
No ones gonna sell with efforts like these

[Anonymous No.55205712]

>>55198769
Because he is the best Jew and the only one exempt from the gas chambers.