decentralized identity

[Anonymous No.55113279]

Which digital ID project will moon the hardest in the coming identity DiD bull?

>KILT
>SPARKS
>CHEQ
>EVEREST

Should I just ape 1k in each?

eIDas 2.0 is about to be passed in the EU which means starting EOY 2023 all EU states have 2 years to offer official state approved DID wallets. That should mark the moment identity smallcaps start mooning as DID enters mainstream media.

[Anonymous No.55113760]

Non. New liberal fascistic bullcrap

[Anonymous No.55114127]

>>55113279
Of the ones you mentioned, Sparks is the new kid on the block. Having said that, it is surprisingly well-networked, and already making material progress on its utilities. KILT, CHEQ, and ID have already undergone a major boom-bust cycle in their respective valuations throughout the previous bull market. SPARK only launched about 6 months ago, has the lowest valuation of the four ($1.2M circulating market cap), and has not yet had its opportunity to shine with the right combination of market tailwinds and product maturity.

Of course, you really should DYOR, but hopefully I've helped provide a bit of context.

[Anonymous No.55114384]

>>55114127
This. They literally have former Facebook/ConsenSys/KILT guys working as part of the DAO among numerous other developers. Bear markets are a gift.

[Anonymous No.55114915]

literally only one solution
the limitless potential of the CRDT token alone makes it a better project than 99% of crypto

[Anonymous No.55114922]

[Anonymous No.55114930]

[Anonymous No.55115704]

>>55113279
>>55114127
>>55114384
I don't see a sparks/eth pair on dextools just usdc. Will buying usdc instead of eth and doing the swap be cheaper?

[Anonymous No.55116160]

Sparks because of their off-chain approach to identity.

Why should you have to commit to one blockchain network and pay token fees to verify things about yourself? You shouldn't. It should be free.

Expecting identities to be siloed on one blockchain while using one token will never work.

How do you argue that proving your identity should cost money?

You can't, because it should be free.

Sparks baby.

[Anonymous No.55116220]

>>55115704
USDC directly to SPARK will probably have lower fees. Isn't there a BTC/SPARK trading pair too?

[Anonymous No.55116231]

Other cool ones I’ve seen that I’d be interested in hearing peoples opinions on

Spruce ID
Yourself ID
Disco.xyz

[Anonymous No.55116247]

>>55116231
Do those have tokens?

[Anonymous No.55116249]

>>55116160
>why does shit have to cost money

[Anonymous No.55116556]

>>55116160
>off-chain identity

[Anonymous No.55117060]

>>55113279
Everest ID is going to absolutely melt faces.

[Anonymous No.55117079]

>>55117060

[Anonymous No.55117086]

>>55113279
I'd say the hardest moon will come to users of Altcoinist platform, once they are able to benefit from all the intel shared in the form of crypto reviews

[Anonymous No.55117105]

>Digital Identification
No thanks

[Anonymous No.55117261]

Dont forget Sharering

SHR

Partnerned with ID2020 Alliance

[Anonymous No.55117621]

>>55113279
The growth has been big. NexeraID has and interesting build up.

[Anonymous No.55117702]

>>55113279
Urbit or ICP

[Anonymous No.55117995]

>>55117079

[Anonymous No.55118647]

>>55116247
>>55116231
Creds.yxz does essentially the same as Disco.xyz but has a token because its run by CHEQ

I decided ill be buying sparks based on the MC and because its on ETH while all the others have some niche chain going on

[Anonymous No.55119842]

Sparks is sent for the lost sheeps of DIDs! You shouldn’t pay for your own identity!
Sparks will melt faces soon

[Anonymous No.55119854]

>>55117995
>>55117079
>>55117060
I bought this shit at $1.2 now it is 3 cents per ID token.

[Anonymous No.55119863]

>>55113279
None of the above

[Anonymous No.55119922]

KILT is the only enterprise-ready DID solution.

t. Deloitte

[Anonymous No.55120643]

>>55113279
>KILT
>SPARKS
>CHEQ
>EVEREST
>ORE

[Anonymous No.55120802]

the KILT chart is looking incredible, such an epic accumulation pattern over the last year. Huge, wide base ---> epic pump, when the time comes.

[Anonymous No.55120859]

>>55113279
You forgot $SATA

[Anonymous No.55121242]

>>55120802
cope

[Anonymous No.55121413]

>>55113279
this is the intelligent idea fren
worst case they all go to zero
but if one does well you will recoup losses from the others
best case they all do well

[Anonymous No.55121721]

everest is literally doing EVERYTHING the banks/regs want. Bob+team are going to meetings and saying "we will do absolutely anything you want to achieve compliance, just tell us", and then they are going and coding it into smart contracts. How many other teams are having meetings like this? Add to this the stablecoin, voting and tokenized assets which is such a game changer its ridiculous and the obvious play is everest.

[Anonymous No.55121938]

You know rocifi? Not exactly a decentralized identity project but its non-fungible credit score tokens can very well function like that.

[Anonymous No.55122227]

>>55121721
the lack of attention for crdt is unreal
one of the most important advances in crypto and its just 1 thing everest does

[Anonymous No.55122309]

Finally a decent thread in /biz.
Will keep an eye on them

[Anonymous No.55122374]

>>55113279
DGB with Digi-ID

[Anonymous No.55122547]

>>55122227
>>55121721
Redpill me on crdt ID bros

[Anonymous No.55122832]

>muh digital id has to be a blockchain because it just has to be okay
Yeah big Corpos aren’t buying your bags. Sorry it’ll just be in house or some private company.

[Anonymous No.55122981]

>>55122547
1:1 backed, programmable, fractionalizable assets

[Anonymous No.55124136]

>>55122547
they are licensed to hold virtual currency by MFSA license (maltese financial services authority), and in order to stay compliant it MUST be 1:1 backed, no exceptions or substitutions.

[Anonymous No.55124163]

>>55114127
>boom-bust cycle

Its called a pump and dump you tard. It happens with all shitcoins. Afterwards they die and never go past 1penny ever again. Welcome newfriend.

[Anonymous No.55124583]

>>55124136
>>55122981
Just look at the price

[Anonymous No.55124597]

>>55124583
are you implying that shit price action means its a shit project?
its unironically a good price to buy but i hope you dont

[Anonymous No.55124628]

>>55120802
Urbit btfo’s KILT

[Anonymous No.55124902]

>>55124597
Bro nobody is building in that shit mobile wallet is garbage

[Anonymous No.55124952]

>>55124902
ok

[Anonymous No.55124981]

>>55124952
Buy better bags

[Anonymous No.55125588]

>>55122374
>Digi-ID
Based Digimarine, I was going to post this

[Anonymous No.55125971]

Kek the Everest baggie is samefagging again.

[Anonymous No.55126658]

>>55125971
Everest is a good one to keep. I might add it up with my spool bag, DI are growing and so are defi and LSDfi.

[Anonymous No.55127465]

>>55113279
Privacy is all that matters, ZKPs are actively solving these problems.

[Anonymous No.55127701]

https://walt.id/

[Anonymous No.55127837]

>>55127701
this has no token but is partnered with CHEQ

>>55122309

[Anonymous No.55127843]

>>55113279
im betting on everest

[Anonymous No.55127873]

Everest or Spark idk

[Anonymous No.55127957]

>>55122832
EU will use DID. Its interoperable in nature which means you will be able to hold credentials created by any of these projects in them or use these projects wallets to hold your gubberment & coprorate credentials.

imagine thinking the official state wallets will have better UI and code than open source projects

[Anonymous No.55128050]

>>55113279
>not a single post suggesting poh or anything connected to the kleros ecosystem
they've been operating in this area for years now and have been scaffolding the infrastructure for just as long. its the fungal root structure that's spreading underneath everything right now, if you want a food analogy

[Anonymous No.55128061]

>>55128050
https://app.proofofhumanity.id/profile/0x92cf8d8080e2891a775e545c5f9688bb61a6de24

lol
lmao even

[Anonymous No.55128085]

>>55116160
>off-chain approach to identity
lmfao into the trash bin

[Anonymous No.55128136]

>>55127465
Cool have fun cashing out or interacting with anything at all you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.55128304]

>>55113279
The BrillionFi smooth identification and top notch security got me interested You have control over your wallet. There's also a sovereign identity which is made possible with the help of Allianceblock NexeraID

[Anonymous No.55128318]

>>55117060
Everest ID is no wear when Nexera ID strike. is a kind of non-invasive identity system developed by AllianceBlock to keep track of users in a safe and personalized way.

[Anonymous No.55128787]

>>55128318
You fucking retard. This is from Bob:
>Nah, I don't believe nexera id and allianceblock can do it. See notes from @Broken_Boxes

Connecting Nodes:
>By the way in case anyone was curious; for a financial Institution to legally take or use KYC:
these 4 attributes MUST be adhered to by law.


>1) The software entity is subject to the SAME obligations for data retention, customer due diligence, that the financial institution they are working with is. This would be according to the laws of each jurisdictional sector. i.e. The software provider must be licensed and regulated by the same laws that the Financial institutions they are working with are beholden to.

>2) Contract of data sharing

>3) Risk of transaction and customer due diligence still must be done by accepting financial institution

>4) Ongoing monitoring still must be done by accepting financial institution

>SOFTWARE SUPPLIERS OF KYC CANNOT DO THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE

>Everest empowers users, organizations, and projects to utilize True Identity, eKYC, and a full suite of financial services including on/off-ramps for fiat/crypto backed 1:1 by our legal and programmable stablecoin voucher.

>Very good summary. To put this in context, it means that DID and ZKP producers are potential partners, not competitors, of Everest.

>95% of other "KYC" solutions are DOA and are not going to pan out.
>Even if they do they will still need to be compliant and conform to regulations + have a license to Operate.
>And even if they get that far they will need to have a true identity system because a VC just doesn't cut it.
>The bank isn't going to take your reputation based VC.
>However Everest is already working with many financial institutions which not only allow for Everest's KYC -- but are an extension of the Everest Network with things like Bitso, Remittances, and our Stablecoin voucher.

>This enables many other markets like remit, loans, microloans, tokenized stocks, realty, TrueDaos and more.

[Anonymous No.55128840]

only one DID token to rule them all

KILT is the standard

[Anonymous No.55128864]

>>55119854
>I bought this shit at $1.2 now it is 3 cents per ID token
>Lol, i know it can be hard to predict with certainty which project will move up next, but keeping an eye on the crypto market trends might give us a clue, my trading has really improved with up to date info on CMC, CryptoCompare, tokenmetrics and nomics, desu

[Anonymous No.55128897]

KILT's chart is looking really juicy. Goes to zero inflation in 5 months, and all this summer the token lockups are going to begin.

[Anonymous No.55129019]

Q Blockchain has Q ID and is working with governments.

[Anonymous No.55129131]

>>55113279
I hold both kilt and sparks - a low mcap digital identity coin is sure to pump when the meta hits...but cheq is absolutely a clear out winner here. the ssi industry is gagging for a business use-case for the technology and cheq are literally walking in fully interoperable with payment rails ready for businesses to use as they transfer to the new business models being forced upon them by eIDAS and GDPR.

They are partnered with 70% of SSI vendors, meaning their network extends globally into multiple industries, and the team is absolutely networked up to the teeth, being former Accenture consultants (biggest tech consulting firm in the world), which will come in handy when Fortune 500 businesses suddenly need a revenue stream to justify this tech transition being mandated by governments.

It's hard to overstate how bullish I am on this project - the work they do has been lauded by Drummond Reed who basically founded the ssi industry and their creds platform could be really revolutionary for a lot of crypto projects.

pic related - they are working with a tier 1 credit rating agency (e.g. experian, though which one it is isn't confirmed until the agency is ready for the press release) to bring credit and kyc to exchanges and defi. These guys don't fuck around and are going places.


>>55114127
this isn't untrue. cheq launched at the end of the bull market and stabilised after a brutal drawdown for launch buyers at 3c. Price is now settled at 5c and anything underneath that gets slurped by a growing array of qnt standards autists. It is still capable of enormous growth.

>>55128897
Holding KILT is pain but I keep buying small amounts in the hopes that one day the brutal VC dumps stop. Polkadot have big treasury money behind them and KILT are probaby the most recognised DiD coin but they really don't seem to give a shit about holders

[Anonymous No.55129200]

>>55129131
in b4 CHEQD gets checked for 2nd time by SEC

surely first round was enjoyable enough imajin buying tokens sued by SEC

[Anonymous No.55129206]

>>55124628
urbit is still years away from being user ready - i worry that devs are going to be fucking around with it for so long that the way identity is done will have already moved past their tech

[Anonymous No.55129220]

>>55129200
I don't see why whatever your token is would be any different. in fact they weren't sued but attempted to be compliant and launch the token correctly but were obviously blocked by the SEC. They're now launched in friendlier jurisdictions and head at least two working groups within the ToIP foundation and DIF. At this point they are actually setting a lot of the standards which will govern how digital identity works.

[Anonymous No.55129294]

>>55129131
based effortposter

[Anonymous No.55129377]

>>55129294
soon prison poster

[Anonymous No.55129447]

>>55129377
it's funny how the only fud levelled against this coin is two years old and not even relevant. Meanwhile cheqd are getting callouts from members of the canadian government on linkedin after they blew the house down at the IIW

https://www.linkedin.com/in/kylegrobinson/

[Anonymous No.55129472]

>>55129447
Alex Tweeddale is the cheqd product manager and heads several Trust Over IP working groups, (he wrote his thesis on Digital Identity) and Ankur Banerjee is a former Accenture tech consultant who has been working in digital identity for 5 years.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-tweeddale/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/banerjeeankur/

[Anonymous No.55129478]

>>55129447
could be 10 years old

will never get old

you are shilling a token that got sued by SEC and 95% of CHEQD holders got tokens to compensate their rekt ICO

perhaps they should focus on usecase

show me a single site where I can use CHEQD dids

I can show you plenty for KILT

[Anonymous No.55129489]

>>55129131
>but they really don't seem to give a shit about holders

This is actually bullish, like with QNT last cycle where the telegram just cried endlessly about not enough AMAs and why isn't Gilbert tweeting about the price. Then it just quietly does 250,000% while everyone complains.

KILT is very by-the-book and professional. I think their vesting schedule was a bit retarded but the tokenomics aside from that are excellent, so once the unlocks stop (October) there's nothing really holding it back.

>>55129472

Wen actual clients? Deloitte and Axel Springer are both huge companies that KILT has landed, which puts to rest any doubt about their legitimacy and clout. That's all that matters in the end, wen clients?

[Anonymous No.55129497]

https://spyce5.com/

[Anonymous No.55129531]

>>55129489
i think you missed pic related >>55129131

cheq announced they are working with one of the top tier credit agencies (https://www.investopedia.com/personal-finance/top-three-credit-bureaus/).). Obviously they can't announce until the client is ready (KILTies know the drill). idk why you guys are so threatened, having multiple players in this space is a good thing - we are trying to create an entire new market for data here and many players in the SSI space look down on coiners for acting juvenile. You should feel lucky you get a chance to buy both.

[Anonymous No.55129625]

>cheqd and kilt shills have turned on each other
Can either of you define "identity"?
I'm dead serious, this is a question for everyone in this thread.

What is identity?

[Anonymous No.55129646]

here's an article which came out today with an interview with Fraser Edward, the cheqd CEO (also ex-accenture).

https://news.bitcoin.com/blockchain-based-re-usable-kyc-particularly-valuable-in-web3-cheqd-ceo-fraser-edward/

chat gpt tl;dr (kek)

Fraser Edward, CEO and co-founder of Cheqd, shared his insights on the challenges of moving data from Web2 servers to Web3. He highlighted the importance of developing a scalable revenue model to overcome these challenges and unlock new use cases within the Web3 ecosystem.

Edward also discussed the rise of the "trusted data market", emphasizing the increasing value of accurate and verified data. He believes that users now want data that's portable and cryptographically verifiable, which in turn fuels the demand for such trusted data.

Addressing "bot paranoia", Edward proposed that a decentralized reputation system could tackle this issue. This system would be based on signals like KYC credentials, social media history, and endorsements from trusted entities.

In terms of the KYC process, Edward argued that a blockchain-based re-usable KYC can streamline the process and improve user experience. Once users go through KYC once, they can use those credentials multiple times with different service providers. This would not only quicken the onboarding process but also enhance user satisfaction.

Finally, Edward provided insights into Cheqd’s function within this ecosystem. It supports the trusted data market by ensuring that data verifiers can pay the data issuers in a privacy-preserving mechanism. This, Edward believes, could stimulate growth and establish cryptocurrencies as a viable alternative to traditional fiat currencies.

[Anonymous No.55129685]

>>55129625
DID isn't actually about identity. In the spec it means decentralized Identifier, not identity.
Its for verifying a statement an entity makes using a verifiable credential, which is just a signed json doc.

You can of course use it to attest to having checked someones liveness in the flesh though

[Anonymous No.55129724]

>>55129206
Holium released Realm's alpha version, it's pretty much normie ready now, it's just 1 killer app away from mass adoption

[Anonymous No.55129740]

>>55129685
>DID isn't actually identity
I agree with that, but I thought DID stood for Digital Identification
either way identity =/= identification

[Anonymous No.55129755]

>>55129740
the spec name is Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs)
https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/

[Anonymous No.55129791]

>>55114384
why former

just because you got hired to clean toilets at Kilt HQ dont make you specialist

[Anonymous No.55129838]

>>55129531
>idk why you guys are so threatened, having multiple players in this space is a good thing

cheqdmates serve a very important purpose here, I agree. KILTies are already extremely wealthy and they can't be persuaded to shitpost very much, but you guys are yet to make it (maybe this cycle, fingers crossed!) and have more time/inclination to post on biz.

So I do genuinely agree that it's good. There are a small handful of players which is hardly over-saturated considering that most shitcoin sectors have 1000 coins doing the same thing. Expect more DID-LARP projects to pop up, though. None will gain traction in the business world, but it all helps to advance the narrative and raise awareness.

Bullish.

[Anonymous No.55129908]

>>55129838
how did KILTies which bought on open market get wealthy? it opened at 8$ and went down ever since.

[Anonymous No.55129928]

>>55129908
it has the biggest QNT whales invested

rest brokies begged Ghost for free cheqd

[Anonymous No.55129951]

>>55129838
a lot of cheq whales were also early qnt buyers - people obsessed with industry standards, quite a few whales there.

i feel like DiDs meta is coming, don't you feel it?

[Anonymous No.55129959]

>>55129928
yeah i heard there's some kind of gay beef between these guys, which maybe explains the hostility

[Anonymous No.55129999]

>>55129755
Oh yeah, it even says it at the start of this https://youtu.be/EISCmVcLxYs?t=45

[Anonymous No.55130215]

>>55129908
>how did KILTies which bought on open market get wealthy? it opened at 8$ and went down ever since.

KILT is only up about 45% from its lows, so I doubt anyone has got wealthy from KILT just yet, but they will. CHEQ seems to be up about 70% from the lows so a similar situation.

The whales are the same lot you're speaking of really, just the less cringe section. The cool kids, basically. QNT money has flowed into both of these coins.

[Anonymous No.55130333]

>>55113279
>Which digital ID project will moon the hardest in the coming identity DiD bull?
I think NexeraID is the missing one there. Unless the market remains stagnant forever, NXRA pump is inevitable.
>Nexera protocol
>PolygonID

[Anonymous No.55130490]

>>55130333

kek, literally who

[Anonymous No.55130633]

>>55129999
nice numbers

The fattie either doesn't understand the w3c standard or is wildly misrepresenting on purpose.
Imagine being this fat

[Anonymous No.55130932]

>>55130633
Can you please elaborate on why you think that and what specifically does he say that is wrong?

[Anonymous No.55131131]

>>55130932
he is microfocusing on most secure IDs for retarded NPCs

verifiable credentials are the future yes some people will get scammed clicking on shit links but with verifiable credentials you can revoke access in 1 click

[Anonymous No.55131222]

>>55131131
>he is microfocusing on most secure IDs for retarded NPCs
Hmmm, yes, you really expanded on what that other anon said. Very convincing.

[Anonymous No.55131527]

>>55130932
There are so many things he gets wrong but to stick to his main points.

>DID and VCs don't allow for de-duplication
VCs just allow a person or entity to make a cryptographic secure assertion.
An entity could easily make an assertion saying "we checked this individual and he/she is unique in our dataset". The tech to check such things like liveleness has nothing to do with DID.
A VC is a data-container and its authenticity is verifiably. What you put into the containers is entirely up to the user.

>DID discovery is broken because it relies on centralized servers being online
This is probably his lowest IQ argument since DID/VC don't specify where DIDs are to be discovered. They can live on a server or a DHT or a blockchain or wherever the issuer of a DID chooses. I think there are hundreds of different implementations. Twitters "web5" thing for instance anchors them on BTC.

He is misrepresenting this fact on purpose or doesn't know this. Both fatal for his credibility.

also he is very fat

[Anonymous No.55131717]

>>55129625
I’m going to really enjoy the meltdowns when regulation starts to kick in

[Anonymous No.55131825]

>>55128787
all my homies hate broken boxes

[Anonymous No.55132429]

>>55131527
>DIDs don't allow for de-duplication
Correct, you are wrong.
>The tech to check such things like liveness has nothing to do with DID
Exactly.
>DID discovery is broken because it relies on centralized servers being online
>DID/VC don't specify where DIDs are to be discovered. They can live on a server or a DHT or a blockchain or wherever the issuer of a DID chooses. I think there are hundreds of different implementations. Twitters "web5" thing for instance anchors them on BTC.
Eh, this is a pretty moot point.
Thanks for expanding on your thoughts for me though. Won't be the first time a fat fuck made me rich either.
>>55131717
Show a demoralised man that white is white and they will still believe it is black etc
>>55131825
top 5 everest community

[Anonymous No.55132491]

everest cope is real

[Anonymous No.55132555]

>>55132491
you're a fucking idiot
you have an immense opportunity staring at you in the face and why you would rather be a smug dunning kruger
that is the reality of the situation
>what is crdt
>what are regulations
>how do I connect a smart contract directly to a unique human

[Anonymous No.55132591]

>>55132491
But NexeraID benzos are coping well anon.

[Anonymous No.55132728]

>>55132555
my fat fuck is Ingo he will make me rich

stick with your with fuck you schizo

imajin thinking people will scan their faces everytime they want to open their wallet
>cope

[Anonymous No.55132737]

>>55132728
>what are associated wallets

[Anonymous No.55133609]

>>55132491
You will be hanging yourself in a year or two from now after realizing how badly you blew it.

>>55132429
>top 5 everest community
So true although I think there are maybe 5 people who contribute anything atm

[Anonymous No.55134851]

So what’s the best digital id project fags?

[Anonymous No.55135127]

>>55134851
Everest you gigganigga

[Anonymous No.55135161]

>>55113279
ICP.

[Anonymous No.55135166]

>>55135127

[Anonymous No.55135397]

>>55135127
Based

[Anonymous No.55135423]

is signata still going?

[Anonymous No.55137001]

>>55113279
Everest is probably the best of all of these if you know what’s been going on with regulation

[Anonymous No.55137512]

>>55135161
ICP sucker. I would rather invest in a PQC based project which has advanced technology and ensures security against the quantum threats. So fuck off moron.

[Anonymous No.55137760]

>>55134851
Everest ID and it's not even close

[Anonymous No.55137771]

>>55132737
>they don't understand the basics about KYC/AML for wallets

[Anonymous No.55137854]

>>55129019
Pure speculation. More than all this we need to ensure security from the QCs so awaiting an quantum resistant L1 to launch soon.

[Anonymous No.55137973]

>>55137001
considering 99% of crypto is speculation and 0% regulations I see you %100 chance you necking when everest dies

[Anonymous No.55138010]

>>55137973
The beauty of crypto is decentralized and I like its nature. I am waiting for a open source decentralized blockchain explorer Librescan to launch soon.

[Anonymous No.55138154]

>>55137973
>0% regulations
https://decrypt.co/138713/what-is-mica-eu-crypto-regulation-explained/

Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.55138868]

>>55137973
this nigger is lost

[Anonymous No.55138938]

>>55137973
oh boy are you in for a shock

[Anonymous No.55139201]

>>55134851
don't listen to scamniggers, its cheqd.

[Anonymous No.55139683]

[Anonymous No.55139695]

Seeing as though we have a disproportionate amount of everbaggies in this thread to usual, reminder to delegate to the Everbased node.

[Anonymous No.55139706]

[Anonymous No.55139707]

Everest baggies are hilarious

[Anonymous No.55139717]

>>55139707
let me guess, you didnt buy link at 15c?

[Anonymous No.55139854]

>>55139706
you supposed to milk fat fuck not join them anon

[Anonymous No.55139901]

>>55139854
I just made this and was going to post it, so dont mistake it for me nodding with whatever you tried to say

[Jealous No.55139906]

arbinu

[Anonymous No.55140061]

>>55139201
so KILT is shilled in congress

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115885/witnesses/HHRG-118-BA21-Wstate-SchoenbergerD-20230510.pdf

[Anonymous No.55140370]

>>55140061
Charles Hoskinson also testified before Congress

[Anonymous No.55140425]

>>55140370

So you're saying KILT will go to ADA's peak mcap? Nice.

[Anonymous No.55140458]

>>55140425
I was saying testifying in front of congress isn't very credible, but sure I don't doubt KILT could pump, I just doubt that it will be around long term if it doesn't integrate Everest.

[Anonymous No.55140580]

>>55140370
you are simple
seething clouded your judgement and went all in on the wrong token

dump everest for kilt now

[Anonymous No.55140941]

Sorry negros Sam Altman’s world coin will be the only game in town and the VCs already have their bags loaded

[Anonymous No.55141265]

>>55140580
I said in the post above yours that I don't doubt KILT could pump, you retard. It's got a better chance than the other credential sharing shitters. I'm not interested in it though because I only invest in mass ecosystem enabling projects like Chainlink and Everest. Go big or go home.

[Anonymous No.55141303]

>>55140941
>>55114930

[Anonymous No.55143715]

>>55132591
Ore ID is also unfathomably based.

[Anonymous No.55144231]

>>55117621
Projects utilizing the ZK tech are building solid momentum. I can see that growth with Railgun too.

[Anonymous No.55144389]

>>55128136
You know nothing Jon Snow. Privacy is the only way crypto will survive this next era of CBDCs. The capitalist are out for total control.

[Anonymous No.55144735]

>>55139707
I sold that shit so fast and went straight to based Defi alts. My current focus is on Immunify, the medical field is adopting blockchain tech for data management.

[Anonymous No.55144959]

>>55113279
Anon I know that Sylo is good at giving maximum privacy when it comes to user identity. with its collaboration with Centrapay, Futerverse and others, it should definitely moon in the next bull run

[Anonymous No.55145108]

I don't want to be doing my own research again bros... it's all so tiresome...

[Anonymous No.55145623]

KILT is about to close with its highest monthly volume in a year, and third highest ever. June will be green as well, just FYI.

[Anonymous No.55145868]

>>55137973
https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-to-delist-privacy-tokens-in-france-italy-spain-and-poland
>regulations don’t mat-

[Anonymous No.55145878]

>>55113279
nostr

[Anonymous No.55146550]

>>55138154
LOL.

[Anonymous No.55146559]

>>55139695
i heard the everbased node is the #1 choice of homosexuals. better to delegate to deez nodes instead.

[Anonymous No.55146729]

>>55146559
fuck off back to telegram with the other cousins

The problem with the Everest community is not that they are gay, nor that they venerate a token that has performed poorly, run by an alleged goatfucker. No, the problem with the Everest community is the Reddit-tier egregorical dominance. There is less than 30 active people in the community at present, and only around 5 of which who do not share this juvenile understanding of memetics. Chainlink saw a similar manifestation in the early years, but the distribution between the hylics and the pneumatics in the community was significantly less severe than it currently is in Everest. Unfortunately I do not expect this trend to slow down. As with The Decline of The Link Marines, Everest’s own experience with normie followers will accelerate until it is completely overrun by hylics willingly posting their faces on Discord and Twitter, and such. The primary hope for Everest’s memetic consciousness is a bear market so distraught, it drives the Pajeets and controlbots away from /biz/ for such a time to allow ascended anons to migrate back to the board and see the world. For now we observe the three castes of the Everest community; The Fudders, who whether ironically or not; proclaim Everest to be a scam, The Reddit-tier hylics, these are those who make up the bulk of the community. They are positive, but their contributions leave a lot to be desired. And the anons, these are the ones who manifest.

[Anonymous No.55146814]

>>55113279
hbar already solves this wtf

[Anonymous No.55146867]

>>55146729

[Anonymous No.55146899]

>>55146814
hbar chuds...

[Anonymous No.55146991]

>>55113279
Can someone explain identity to me?
I can understand how user verification is a very big market with everything migrating online. Eventually there are going to be a couple of pretty big companies doing it.
But what does that have to do with solutions aimed at creating a decentralized database?
A full DAO with employees that do the verification is too complex.
Just storing user data and having the user allow access to the companies is really no different than PGP cryptography. There's no need for the rest, you can already identify yourself with your wallet.

Most of the project remind me how NFTs are not even the artworks themselves but rather a link to a server.
And from the rest of the projects only some ultra globohomo ones like worldcoin, that use crypto only for the marketing aspect, have any real world usage.

[Anonymous No.55147105]

>>55146991
Identity is something you are, it's not a credential that can be given to you by a government agency or otherwise created to give yourself authenticity. Essentially this boils down to things like biometrics, DNA etc. Because establishing identity is labor consuming and inherently local, it doesn't work well for crypto because crypto is pseudonymous and prone to sibyl attacks. The solution for this is going to be biometric proof of identity/humanity that is attested semi-regularly by an end user. You can put that info in a datagram and share it and you don't need a massive number of employees to do this. Eventually you're going to see real identity (biometrics) replace all identification and credential sharing because it's inherently more reliable. None of this is the same as PGP cryptography because PGP only attests to something you know (your key) not who you are.

Worldcoin can't scale because they only verify biometrics through their shitty devices when the account is created and never again which has created a secondary black market for accounts. It doesn't protect against sibyl attacks. They are also violating the GDPR because they're using customer data to train AI.

[Anonymous No.55148214]

>>55113279
>>55114127
>>55114915
>>55114384
>>55114922
>>55114930
>>55116160
>>55117060
>Le decentralized identites will take me to Le Moon!
2019 called it wants its shitcoin ideas back
LTO already tried and failed to do this exact thing years ago, there's just no money to be made by it this decade, you'll be stuck bag holding until 2030 atleast if you fall for the decentralised identity may may

[Anonymous No.55148371]

>>55148214
>doesn't know the difference between credential sharing and identity

[Anonymous No.55149833]

>>55148214
the difference is now you have the governments controlling the biggest economies pushing for and implementing DID

[Anonymous No.55150063]

>>55147105
Thank you for the spoonfeeding anon.

So I take a picture of my cornea, combine it in some way with, let's say, the last block hash that could somehow affect the photo taking settings as a form of timestamp to prevent replay attacks and use that as an identifier.
Ok, but why do we need blockchain to do that? I'm sure there are other ways to get a timestamp.
A company could just release the device and specifications and other companies would use the proofs as a login method.

[Anonymous No.55150125]

>>55138868
What do autist hyperboreans buy?

[Anonymous No.55151253]

>>55150125
They all made it with BTC/ETH/LINK already and left /biz/.
You need advice from smug heaven now, but they always fud their bags so you'll never know what to buy really. That's why you need to dyor.

[Anonymous No.55151373]

>>55143715
One of the few multichain solutions.

[Anonymous No.55151496]

>>55113279
>>55113760
only advanced one that is truly libertarian in spirit is dero right now

[Anonymous No.55152803]

>>55116160
this right here