What happened

[Anonymous No.54819507]

The threads regarding this coin turned into an endless shit flinging contest and it feels like the same 10 mentally deranged people are battling each other over and over again. I used to enjoy the discussion provided on this forum but not it's just horrible and draining to read through. Seriously, what went wrong with /biz/ and Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.54819533]

There's like 20 unique posters on /biz/ these days.

[Anonymous No.54819545]

>>54819507
The FUD-Wars are in full swing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FKpU0pnne8

[Anonymous No.54819683]

>>54819507
It's either paid fudders or salty retards who bought at $50. It doesn't make sense for anyone else to fud like that. The project is solid, the fundamentals are there and the team met every deadline so far.

[Anonymous No.54819722]

>>54819683
>The project is solid

[Anonymous No.54819791]

>>54819507
It's just a demoralization psyop run by linkies against would-be normie buyers. These guys were rampant in the early days but went quiet through most of 2019-2021 during the bullrun, then when link started dumping they came back out of the woodwork. If you ask them why they'll tell you the truth, they get their kicks from fudding. They're the same low-rent sociopaths you'll find on any other board here. If they weren't spamming 37 link fud threads per day on /biz/ they'd be spamming 74 blacked porn threads on /pol/. Same people. Don't overthink it.

[Anonymous No.54819819]

>>54819722
Great, now show me defi without link oracles.

[Anonymous No.54819869]

That's the goal, to turn every LINK discussion into incomprehensible noise as soon as possible so no LINK discussion is being held.

[Anonymous No.54819910]

>>54819819
>DeFi
all altcoins are scams

[Anonymous No.54819981]

It's just a handful of people whose entire identity left in life is to talk badly about a singular thing. Day by day, month by month, something to just help expend their finite life.
Either that or they get off to misery of others because their brain is wired to being fed dopamine off of it or something.
Then their strongest argument is that because LINK was spammed so much on biz that the correct revenge plan is to.. make more LINK threads and bump up LINK threads?

[Anonymous No.54819994]

>>54819819
Probably none, still 90% down and price feeds don't need the token to read data.

Waiting for jump trading copy pasta or any other ad hominems

[Anonymous No.54820019]

Everyone is shellshocked and in some form of disbelief, denial, delusion, or anger. There was a mass migration to CT during 2021 where it’s copium chartposting and up-only cultism. A few of those come back to either fud for fun or delusionally hype the project. A massive faggot named bubbafox on Twitter is definitely in all of these threads. Most fudders here are one of about 5 bored or angry bagholders making bait threads.
So your general sentiment is correct: there is absolutely no traction in the bear market and these threads are full of the same 15 mentally ill “people” every single day. The high level discussion is gone because the CT cult won’t ever be critical of LINK, and any earnest discussion that gets started here immediately devolves into braindead shitflinging.
I’m in a generous mood so let’s be constructive today. There are 4 possible outcomes with LINK:
1. Crypto sees widespread adoption and LINK is adopted as the de facto oracle standard, the token is needed, and the value explodes.
2. Same as 1 but the token isn’t needed and the value of the LINK token plummets while the value of Chainlink explodes.
3. Crypto gets controlled by the same VC and MEV mafiosos and pumps and dumps artificially for a few more cycles before fizzling out.
4. Crypto crashes and burns all at once due to a black swan of extreme regulation, another FTX type scandal, or tradfi just abandoning it for some other solution.

Sergey at Consensus was extremely annoyed by the fact that option 3 is still such a threat. The CT fags hyped his talk up as somehow based (he’s scolding the bad actors!) but the reality is if there wasn’t a genuine threat of it happening for another decade he wouldn’t waste so much of his time on it. That to me was everything I needed to know about how to play the next cycle. He gave us so much information there about how little control he has over the future and what the space actually is and where adoption actually stands

[Anonymous No.54820030]

>>54819545
oh that a trip down memory lane, forgot about that show
it was that sweet spot in time when silly things like kids show got to experiment with what at the time where the cutting edge graphics possible

[Anonymous No.54820046]

never did and never will hold chainlink
making fun baggie cuckolds is hilarious

[Anonymous No.54820063]

>>54820019
>4: or tradfi just abandoning it for some other solution
this is no a threat or an issue for crypto as a whole
2 is the one to focus on if you want to say something intelligent

[Anonymous No.54820077]

>>54820046
this but 100% unironically

The sheer amount of cope, schizophrenia and rage they spout on a daily basis is pretty entertaining ngl

[Anonymous No.54820144]

>>54820063
2 and 3 are what’s happening right now. 2 is by far the biggest concern longterm, it would mean we were right about chainlink but we still lose.

[Anonymous No.54820495]

>>54819507
It's a psyop to keep out buyers. Whether it's because they want it for themselves or are trying to starve the beast, who knows?

[Anonymous No.54820519]

>>54820019
>That to me was everything I needed to know about how to play the next cycle
You're talking about selling during max hype or what?

[Anonymous No.54820537]

>>54819994
Even the "free" price feeds require token payments to nodes.

[Anonymous No.54820547]

>>54820144
I think 2 is by far the biggest threat. 3 doesn't seem likely to me and even if it is, Link is going be used by big tech outside of crypto as implied here:
>>>54820076

[Anonymous No.54820618]

>>54820547
>>54820144
>token not needed!

So much for sincere discussion lmao

[Anonymous No.54820620]

>>54819683
I'll give you a couple of answers I've filtered over the years to be true, from the few times I've gotten a fudder in a rare moment of clarity:

1) Turbo autists who figured out the need for externally connected smart contracts very quickly, and who now seethe at the entire world for failing to understand it like they do. Chainlink is sort of like a metaphor for their general inability to integrate with society, where they are rational and right and it's the world's fault it's so irrational and dumb..
These people fud because in their mind the world should have figured out LINK in 2019 at the absolute latest, but failed to, and so they'll seethe and rage at everyone and everything as a way to express this frustration.

2) People who had LINK stacks but lost them swinging, or gambling, or in a CeFi collapse, or who simply got fudded out of LINK back in 2018 and have been furious ever since. They will never buy LINK because they can't buy it at $0.30 like they had the chance to back then, and then basically rage at people continuing to hold because "if I can't make it then neither can you"

3) People who try to profit off taking an oppositional position to LINK. Usually grifters like the CLCG/Honeycomb/API3 guys, or NEXO, who are charlatan fraudsters and basically parasitic animals to Chainlink just like there are many fraudster teams that are parasitic animals to ETH. They fud because muddying the waters about Chainlink lets them shill themselves, it doesn't go much deeper than that.

4) The seriously mentally ill, like Michael, who also fits in category 2) but has now made a large part of his online identity "being a link fudder" and can't really distance themselves from that because it's the only way they can consistently get attention online, which they crave

[Anonymous No.54820877]

>>54819533
dont think we reached this level. there is too much shit still here. bear market should last 2-3y to wash the scum out and make alphafags return

[Anonymous No.54820896]

>>54819507
Fudders unironically. Fucking bad goys ruined this project with their Great Reset memes.

[Anonymous No.54820974]

>>54820620
which one is michael again, it hard to keep track of them all

[Anonymous No.54821108]

>>54820620
not reading that schizo rant

[Anonymous No.54821137]

>>54819507
its a bottom signal

We are still all in this together

[Anonymous No.54821183]

>>54819507
it's dead and bagholders are in denial

[Anonymous No.54821577]

>>54820974
Duuuuuude-poster is Michael the Chink aka Uncle Oldfag aka Schiff Will Win
https://archived.moe/biz/thread/43747787/
https://www.reddit.com/user/ANStoTheMoon
Basically a mentally ill poorfag that got outed as a larper and a NEO holder lmao

[Anonymous No.54821755]

>>54821577
>NEO holder
It's pure projection, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.54821905]

>>54821755
Yes thats why that particular chink is so mentally ill

[Anonymous No.54822009]

>>54819683
>It's either paid fudders or salty retards who bought at $50.
It's 4chan, people will adopt the most retarded and/or contrarian standpoints if that mean it gets them (You)s.

LINK fudders are just like fallout 3 fans on /v/, or vegans on /fit/, or bbc posters on /pol/, they don't really belive what they say they just enjoy the attention.

[Anonymous No.54822200]

>>54820019
IMO Sergey really isn't much different than the VC's and MEV. They're all just trying to extract max profit of all of this bullshit before the window closes. His actions show a complete lack of conscience as he's partnered with plenty of malicious actors.

At this point arguing about it all is a waste. I'm just praying for another pump so I can get out and reinvest in something that will actually go up.


>>54821755
so its the same as the Link chart more or less...

[Anonymous No.54822237]

>>54822200
>so its the same as the Link chart more or less...
No, Link is still up massively against ETH in that same timeframe

[Anonymous No.54822263]

>>54822200
>Link is still up massively against ETH
why are linkies such sleazy liars

[Anonymous No.54822274]

>>54822263
lying is all these losers have left

[Anonymous No.54822276]

>>54822200
>>54822263
When NEO started bleeding, Link was 33 cents

[Anonymous No.54822458]

>>54819910
Fuxking retard. I will post a thread on how much I made from ORE soon.

[Anonymous No.54822925]

>>54820618
I mean look at the adoption (high) and look at the price (cratering). There’s no other way to frame it anon. It’s literally working perfectly and yet the price is still firmly rooted to bullshit hype cycles. It’s worrying. If you want to explain why it isn’t feel free, if not fuck off to Twitter where you can be up-only like the rest of
the of schizos there

[Anonymous No.54822945]

>>54820618
If the token usage is going up but the price isn't following, then the usage isn't fundamentally tied to usage.
Please explain why this statement is wrong.

[Anonymous No.54823067]

>>54822925
>>54822945
>hurrr price should go up if usage goes up
So explain how when the price of ETH crashes, the usage of Ethereum explodes to the point of absolute congestion.

Be honest, Link is your first and only crypto hold right?

[Anonymous No.54823118]

>>54823067
>Link is your first and only crypto hold right?
Obviously. I'm not a mentally ill fudder, just a brainlet asking questions.

[Anonymous No.54823180]

>>54823067
It's probably because most of the price of crypto assets is based on speculations rather than on usage based demand.

[Anonymous No.54823212]

>>54823180
It's not just crypto at all.
Price not following merit is a common occurrence, hence the old adage "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent".

[Anonymous No.54823267]

>>54823212
Fair enough. I wonder how long it would take for Link to rise based on actual usage. It's interesting how we're seeing entities like IBM basically shilling Link while replacing thousands of workers to "AI and automation."

[Anonymous No.54823329]

>>54823267
Once Swift integration happens and LINK is needed to change money intentionally the prime Minister of Haiti will be begging me to dump my bags for 1k a coin so that they can trade. And I'll look at him and say "My linkies? 2k minimum." And he'll pay up. It's the future of finance.

[Anonymous No.54823333]

>>54819507
can someone explain to someone that just started with crypto what is this chainlink meme? Why chuds are pushing this thing so adamantly?

[Anonymous No.54823356]

>>54819683
met every deadline? CCIP?

[Anonymous No.54823517]

>>54819683
>met every deadline
>no ccip
>no enterprise abstraction layer
>no date for staking unlocks
>no functions mention at consensus
>blames banks for slow pace when he set deadlines for last year

Bagholder bingo

[Anonymous No.54823586]

>>54819507
>1pbtid
How organic