Chainlink will make you rich

[Anonymous No.54443029]

Imagine if chainlink secures only 10% of everything in pic related

That will translate to a total value secured of at least 1 trillion dollars

Money is financial messages; you send money and someone receives it. Without the mechanism of transfer that money has no value. The security of the transfer system is what gives money value.

Chainlink is the next system of money transfer on a global level. It might take longer than you anticipated, but once this thing starts steaming forward, nothing will stop it.

And to the incoming fudders, you are pathetic for 2 main reasons:

The first reason is that you dont hold chainlink and are just pathetic little losers

The second reason is that you hold chainlink, but you dont believe in what you are holding 100% so you subconsciously fud the project to feel better about yourself in the highly unlikely situation that the project fails.

You are even more pathetic that those who do not hold link.


tl;dr
Chainlink = SWIFT with a token

[Anonymous No.54443041]

token not needed

[Anonymous No.54443040]

token not sneeded

[Anonymous No.54443058]

>>54443029
>plebbitspacing
Shitstink baggies are a baggie-cult similar to GME/XRP/Silverfags now. Posting about LINK used to be based, before 2019, at least certainly in 2018. Now it's just sad.

[Anonymous No.54443068]

>>54443029
Based OP. Everything you said is true. You bring the unwashed shitskins out of the woodwork with your true statements. They can kvetch all they like, it changes nothing.
1keoy.

[Anonymous No.54443178]

>>54443029
Actually fellow newfriend its a TCP/IP with a token

[Anonymous No.54443205]

>>54443040
>>54443041

[Anonymous No.54443228]

>>54443029
Holy cope! Token will never be needed.

[Anonymous No.54443243]

>>54443029
I am pelvic floor deep into chainlink ticker LINK

[Anonymous No.54443256]

>>54443205
that code is optional
you can just call the USD-based API instead

[Anonymous No.54443259]

>>54443029
KILL YOURSELF

[Anonymous No.54443282]

> but once this thing starts steaming forward, nothing will stop it.

You mean after they flip the switch?
Get your own catch phrase retard

[Anonymous No.54443300]

>>54443282
i know right
"steaming forward" is NOT a link thing
dont try to make it one

[Anonymous No.54443314]

>>54443300
Holy checked

[Anonymous No.54443316]

>>54443300
>>54443282
>>54443259
>>54443256
>>54443228
>>54443058
>>54443041
>>54443040
Seething skitskins. Brown niggers. Ugly unwanted products of disgusting shit coloured single mothers. hahahahha
STAY MAD FAGGOTS
1K EOY.

[Anonymous No.54443333]

>>54443316
if kek agreed with you, you would have gotten digits
face it, the magick of lord kek is gone

[Anonymous No.54443341]

>>54443333
WHAT DOES IT MEAN

[Anonymous No.54443346]

>>54443333
>Script faggot thinks he's hot shit
I notice you didn't disagree with me that you're a disgusting non-white. Script all the gets you want, I HAVE WHITE SKIN AND TWO PARENTS, kek. You can continue seething now.

[Anonymous No.54443347]

>>54443316
KILL YOURSELF
END YOUR LIFE
SUICIDE FROM DRUG OVERDOSE

[Anonymous No.54443363]

>>54443347
No. I think I'll continue living my best life, actually. Link is going to make me spectacularly rich and I'm going to form a think tank to bring back White self-autonomy over Europe.

[Anonymous No.54443375]

>>54443333
oooooooooooooo

[Anonymous No.54443435]

>>54443333
Op btfo

[Anonymous No.54443533]

omg this is just liek 2018 XD

[Anonymous No.54443575]

>>54443029
We've been imagining this shit 6 years already. I'm so tired bros

[Anonymous No.54443581]

>>54443333
Lol, kek has spoken and we are back

[Anonymous No.54443588]

>Imagine
Stopped reading there. This is what made me poor. Imagining things that will never happen while holding a dead shitcoin from 2017. Our chances of making it from literal VC shitcoins is orders higher than LINK. That's why I'm all-in APT. Fuck this shit.

[Anonymous No.54443591]

>>54443333
linkies btfo

[Anonymous No.54443727]

>>54443333
>>54443533
>>54443588
it's fucking OVER

[Anonymous No.54443759]

>>54443333
chekt and rekt

[Anonymous No.54443771]

>>54443029

[Anonymous No.54443783]

>>54443029
> Imagine if chainlink secures only 10% of everything in pic related

It's going to secure a lot more than 10%. It's going to secure the entirety of global wealth and usher in the fourth industrial revolution. AI smart contracts will use Chainlink (Ticker: LINK)

[Anonymous No.54443793]

>>54443029
I think I’m not the only one on here that realizes that the Chainlink discussions here aren’t organic at all.

A complex mix of paid shills and bots post memes and start conversations. Real anons browsing /biz/ think these convos are real and start making convos themselves. Then when things die down, the bots and paid shills start again to capture new bagholders.

[Anonymous No.54443852]

>>54443793
> tell me you're not holding link without telling me you're not holding link

faggot

[Anonymous No.54443889]

>>54443852
>derpity derp durr hurr tell me x without telling me lol rolf lmao
>bipolar zoom zoom checks sacred fud digits and then proceeds to simp for Sergey with ancient maymays
>>>/tiktok/

[Anonymous No.54443904]

>>54443889

[Anonymous No.54444170]

I want to crash the corrupt system, not make it more robust.

[Anonymous No.54444239]

>>54443333

[Anonymous No.54444248]

While Chainlink has gained significant attention and support from the blockchain community, it is still relatively early in its development and adoption. Some critics argue that the technology may not be widely adopted by mainstream users or industries, which could limit its potential impact.

[Anonymous No.54444253]

>>54443333
>kek appears just to say he doesn't exist
classic japester god

[Anonymous No.54444263]

>>54443029
Token needed. Bulgarians are subhuman.

[Anonymous No.54444320]

>>54444248
>chainlinkgod or gpt bot you be the judge

[Anonymous No.54444512]

>>54443029
>Imagine if
The only place chainlink secures 10% of all those markets is in your head. And if you think that's bs then I have one question, why is the role needed? Vague answers will be considered a non answer

[Anonymous No.54444800]

>>54443029
>Chainlink = SWIFT with a token
uh sorry sweetie, XRP holds that title of "New SWIFT"

OOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooo

[Anonymous No.54444854]

>>54443029
sorry, i'm just not buying.

[Anonymous No.54444872]

>>54443029
I dont want to say youre going to lose everything because I sont want to jinx my own coin, but Be careful with that coin anon

[Anonymous No.54444933]

>>54443029
The only place I've seen chainlink shilled is on 4chan. It's most definitely a shitcoin shilled by indians stinking shit. That coin is just a scam and you are all going to lose your money sitting on that rugpull

[Anonymous No.54445006]

>>54444512
100% that's a GPT post

[Anonymous No.54445016]

>>54443029
Why would they use link instead of XRP?

[Anonymous No.54445024]

>>54443333
We're not worthy!

[Anonymous No.54445025]

Steeming forward

[Anonymous No.54445247]

>>54443029
>imagine if my cuckold token secures the entire financial system...
yeah to bad this will never happen, you fell for a stupid 2017 meme.

Imagine seriously believing a fat retard like Sergey becoming richer than the Rotschilds lol

[Anonymous No.54445508]

>>54445247
rothschilds also own link lmao they can buy up the whole supply if they want to

[Anonymous No.54445592]

>>54445508
so why don't they? what are they waiting for?

[Anonymous No.54445670]

At the end, I will be rich, and you will always be Bulgarian.

[Anonymous No.54445717]

>>54445247
I only need it to get to about $100 and I'll be rich beyond my wildest dreams; while you are still struggling to pay your gas bill because you missed the opportunity of a lifetime.
Classic loser. Buy some rope.

[Anonymous No.54445727]

>>54443333
>Why did Kek bless this thread with digits?

[Anonymous No.54445738]

>>54445727
the lord works in mysterious ways

[Anonymous No.54445741]

>>54443029
Everyone here already knows this. The problem is we are now realizing that only fundamental value increase will bring the valuation it deserves. Speculative value is out the window. So instead of it being 5 years until we are rich, it’s now 15-20. That changes everything and generally makes this a way less attractive hold. I’d rather have 2 million in 5 years than 200 million in 20.

[Anonymous No.54445742]

>>54445717
>I only need a x10!
>only
greed is a helluva drug anon

[Anonymous No.54445808]

>>54445508
>they can buy up the whole supply
No they can't. They can't have mine. Not even one.
I HATE THE ANTICHRIST.

[Anonymous No.54445858]

Smartcon this year is going to be so depressing.
>"Real staking coming soon guys"
>"We're being really careful with CCIP. We want to get it right. We're currently in beta with a few projects..."
>"DECO is now in beta with a few projects..."
>"FSS is now in working alpha"
>"Here's the latest research from Ari and Dahlia. We've got some demos for you guys."
>"We're proud to announce that we've enabled x-trillions of dollars worth of transactions. We're also focusing more on value capture."
>-2.3%

[Anonymous No.54445920]

>>54443029
This belongs in a museum.

[Anonymous No.54446010]

>>54444248
The push towards tokenization of capital markets doesn't look like it's going to slow down. Chainlink has ALL FOUR bases covered to allow for this to take place

https://ir.citi.com/gps/MG9DEWhoYvQJVWLM9Kr3%2BZmqjoztKJcyNHr83F9Wug2pzAGHPQKfp23RAMrkNts%2FJitXoTNqufOvegUjjXh0IA%3D%3D

[Anonymous No.54446074]

>>54446010
so according to this report I should be buying all this shit, right?

[Anonymous No.54446080]

>>54445741
>15-20 years
Based on what?

[Anonymous No.54446110]

>>54446074
You can buy all that shit if you want, I'm sure it will pump along side LINK. Enjoy it rugpulling on you while chainlink's market dominance only gets stronger

[Anonymous No.54446116]

>>54443178
Who have I been paying my TCP/IP tax too then? I've been scammed.

[Anonymous No.54446143]

>>54446110
woah, why such an aggressive tone anon? is it because I caught you trying to portray the citi report as pointing to chainlink as the only oracle solution available?
very triggered indeed

[Anonymous No.54446147]

>>54446110
Chainlink's been losing market dominance. I'm not saying that it isn't the best protocol, but VC scam projects always want to use their own oracles eg. Pyth.

[Anonymous No.54446491]

>>54446143
They might look biased if they only mention the one serious project. Remember this is the same citi that predicted LINK eventually having a greater market cap than bitcoin? I don't remember them saying the same about APU3 or ptyh

[Anonymous No.54446545]

>>54446491
>They might look biased if they only mention the one serious project
nice head canon, but it seems like they're not singling out link, despite your gaslighting efforts
>Remember this is the same citi that predicted LINK eventually having a greater market cap than bitcoin?
and they were wrong, what's your point? that citi's predictions are unreliable? agreed

[Anonymous No.54446561]

>>54443333
witnessed

[Anonymous No.54446581]

>>54443333
OHGOWEEP

[Anonymous No.54446610]

>>54446545
Learn what gaslighting means.
>and they were wrong, what's your point?
Key word "eventually". It's an unfalsifiable claim, thus cannot possibly be wrong

[Anonymous No.54446632]

>>54446610
>Enjoy it rugpulling on you while chainlink's market dominance only gets stronger
this is the definition of gaslighting though
>unfalsifiable claim
so worthless?

[Anonymous No.54446649]

>>54443333
Bullish

[Anonymous No.54446656]

>>54446632
Nice pilpul, rabbi.

[Anonymous No.54446658]

>>54443029
>$4 trillion insurance
that can't be right, I know FDIC insurance and stuff like that are not insured 1:1 but apply a sort of fractional reserve scheme, but 4 big ones seems suspiciously low, i suspect this insurance is only non-financial e.g. homeowner, car and life insurance.

[Anonymous No.54446673]

>>54446632
>this is the definition of gaslighting though
It's not
>so worthless?
Of course, it just illustrates Citi's overall thoughts on chainlink

[Anonymous No.54446684]

>>54443029
So should I be investing in LINK or not

[Anonymous No.54446727]

>>54446080
Based on general averages of society shifting technologies

[Anonymous No.54446751]

>>54446684
It has been a bad choice for more time than it has been a good choice.

[Anonymous No.54446754]

>>54446074
Not a bad idea, with the exception of chainlink then they are all outside of top 100 marketcap.
It would probably cost no more than a $1000 to have the same % total supply ownership in all these tokens as your link tokens.

Imagine the pain if smartcontracts become THE thing in international banking and they end up using API3 or whatever as the oracle..

[Anonymous No.54446831]

>>54446751
Are the price forecasts for the next 5 years just a meme then? Or outright shills? I’m looking for safe investments the particularly in the realm of crypto that are safe but still give at least moderate returns within the next 3 to 5 years (at least 100-150% ROI). More would be better but im not really looking for memecoins that have an overnight +4500% but then plummet to -98% overnight.

[Anonymous No.54446833]

>>54446754
there's no maybe about it
API3 has blown chainlink out of the water in terms of development, professionalism, and sheer gumption.

[Anonymous No.54446863]

>>54446656
>the jew cries out in pain as he strikes you
>>54446673
occam's razor would suggest that while they do have faith in oracle technology, they don't necessarily believe LINK is the best, like they did before, hence why they chose to include every oracle project out there in their latest report
just saying that this makes a whole lot of sense compared to your head canon of city not wanting to be "biased" on a straightforward report about the state of the oracle market, whatever the fuck that means lol

[Anonymous No.54446862]

>>54446754
>Imagine the pain if smartcontracts become THE thing in international banking and they end up using API3 or whatever as the oracle..
The whole international banking industry hinging on API3 or whatever? That would certainly be interesting

[Anonymous No.54446871]

>>54446831
>(at least 100-150% ROI
kek, you could get that with Eth very, very safely.
Link will also give you that, no problem. It is my opinion that Link will give you anywhere from 30 to 50x over the next 4 years. Ignore the discord fud trannies, they're a bitter, lonely, sad bunch.

[Anonymous No.54446879]

>>54446833
api3 best coin sirs
is real partner ships under the Ganges mother ganga says

Hail sri Krishna api3 aur band protocol
Zindabaad sirs

[Anonymous No.54446890]

>>54446862
How are assassination smart contracts supposed to even work Aripostr?

[Anonymous No.54446914]

>>54446863
>Cringe posting
Chainlink is the only Oracle. There are no competitors. To say otherwise is an embarrassing state of affairs. You must surely realise how blatantly your biases are displayed when you make such pitiful statements.

[Anonymous No.54446926]

>>54446914
not according to citi

[Anonymous No.54446954]

>>54446890
>"Investigating the Future of Criminal Smart Contracts" - Ari Juels
>https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/358
>Ctrl + f: Assassination
>11 results

[Anonymous No.54447003]

>>54446926
>Citi is shit now ignore them
>oh wait actually don't ignore them
hahaha
They named them all out of a sense of completeness and to be informative. You know, as well as I do, as well as Citi does that there is only Chainlink. Come on now, stop being openly dishonest. You're not that stupid.

[Anonymous No.54447026]

>>54447003
>They named them all out of a sense of completeness and to be informative
why? and why did they omit that on their previous report?
what makes the previous report more reliable and accurate than the latest one?

[Anonymous No.54447090]

>>54447026
They just learned more. The other 'oracles' are so shit and useless that they genuinely didn't even become aware of their existence until they did a second pass. Then they were like 'oh shit, there are others' and included them. They were probably a little embarrassed to have missed them but you can't blame them, can you? It's like if you were listing all the massive bodies in the solar system, with Link being the sun (99% of the mass) and then, whoops, you forgot to include some shitty little asteroid in the Oort cloud the size of Pluto.
Who cares about them? They're functionally irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.54447155]

>>54445592
you think they aren't? i'm pretty sure they are slowly accumulating

[Anonymous No.54447163]

>>54447090
I think this is a bit arrogant but the fact is simple, the Chainlink network is another caliber completely of oracle network than any other competitor on a magnitude that honestly looks like will not be challenged successfully

[Anonymous No.54447166]

>>54447090
nice gaslighting anon lmao
>it's all a theater guise, ignore this thorough and comprehensive report that has little to do with oracles themselves and and focus on a clickbait name-drop they did 2 years ago for a bitcoin report, using sources from a roastie's article on Decrypt!
congrats, you've played yourself
https://decrypt.co/51015/2020-has-been-chainlinks-year-heres-why
>>54447155
then you won't have any problems demonstrating this accumulation on-chain

[Anonymous No.54447190]

Eres un cuckoldo
Estas en una secta
Has invertido en un esquema Ponzi
Estas perdiendo dinero
Glorificas a un gordo ladrón ruso llamado Sergey
Eres un incel

[Anonymous No.54447201]

>>54447166
>gaslighting
Very jewish of you to describe what you're doing and pin it on me. Very jewish indeed. I'm going to stop wasting my time with you. You know I'm right, everyone else knows I'm right. You're a liar. Chainlink is literally the only Oracle in the space that is worth a damn. The rest are pathetic. They don't have one tenth of the functionality, one one-hundredth of the team or one one-thousandth of the connections.
If you believe otherwise that's just embarrassing. Please sterilise yourself for the good of your village.

[Anonymous No.54447213]

>>54447201
>I possess intimate knowledge of citibank's figureheads responsible for this report allow me to lay it on you.
>I'm not gaslighting, you are!
sad really

[Anonymous No.54447228]

>>54447201
>Chainlink is literally the only Oracle in the space that is worth a damn
New cuckold COPE just dropped!

I guess the entire market is retarded then ;)

[Anonymous No.54447244]

>>54447166
>then you won't have any problems demonstrating this accumulation on-chain
How the hell am i supposed to locate their wallets nigger? i'm pretty sure there are whale wallets accumulating more and it could literally be any of them
>inb4 no one is accumulating

[Anonymous No.54447260]

>>54447244
then how the hell can you be pretty sure that accumulation is taking place? a lucky hunch?

[Anonymous No.54447261]

>>54446074
Yes? I made a shitload of money on TRB back in 2020. Even wrote an information pasta on it that made other anons a lot of money too. If you believe a certain sector is going to take off, it is never a bad idea to invest in some other businesses besides the market leader.

The fact that Chainlink is the market leader, defacto standard and only project in the oracle space currently worth anything to big enterprises, is undeniable. I don't know why you would engage in this futile pil pul match to prove.... what exactly?
>>54446143
>is it because I caught you trying to portray the citi report as pointing to chainlink as the only oracle solution available?
Ah, a very crafty jew indeed. You're trying to pin anon on this as if it were an absolute (Chainlink is the only Oracle solution available), while anon is asserting Chainlink is the only Oracle solution currently worth a damn (which is true). Looks like he took the bait. Congrats.

[Anonymous No.54447294]

>>54443029
A bagholder made that image while seething and crying.

[Anonymous No.54447295]

>>54447261
>yes?
cool thanks for the financial advise
>You're trying to pin anon on this as if it were an absolute (Chainlink is the only Oracle solution available), while anon is asserting Chainlink is the only Oracle solution currently worth a damn (which is true)
source? cause it sure sounds like gaslighting to me

[Anonymous No.54447311]

>>54447260
you are just trolling at this point, fuck off retard

[Anonymous No.54447321]

Stop the fud thomas

[Anonymous No.54447355]

>>54447311
>I'm pretty sure that accumulation is taking place!
>why??
>huuurrrrr epic bait troll durrrrr
unironically what the fuck is happening inside your brain
a citibank report you people invoke (CLG and his copycats on /biz/) LITERALLY spells out the many different oracle solutions out there, but YOU are hellbent on disregarding that as (((pilpul jewish tactics))) yet at the same time, a similar report released at the peak of the bullrun convinced you that LINK eventually will surpass BTC's cap.
yet I am the one who's attempting to gaslight the board
the fucking irony

[Anonymous No.54447359]

>>54447295
>cool thanks for the financial advise
Wasn't as much as a gotcha as you thought it was, was it. Many Linkies bought TRB back then. BAND less so, because it was blatantly copying Chainlink's code and an obvious pajeet project like Mobius. API3 tried to gain relevance by antagonizing Chainlink, so I understand the anonomisity towards it as well. Should not let that get in the way of profits, though. Personally I don't think API3 brings that much to the table, but all oracle projects will rise with the tide and smallers projects will rise harder so do with that information what you will.
>source?
>>54443029

[Anonymous No.54447364]

>>54447359
so the source is Kemal from Chainlink? gotchu bro

[Anonymous No.54447375]

>>54446833
Pffft

[Anonymous No.54447386]

>>54447364
The source is your own sassy buckering in this thread. Reread your posts for more information.

[Anonymous No.54447396]

>>54447386
???
>chainlink is da greatest and da bestest
>source??
>ohhh fuck off ya little twat derpity derp

[Anonymous No.54447398]

>>54447386
Bickering*

[Anonymous No.54447543]

>>54447396
Oh you meant a source for Chainlink being the market leader? Kek, I thought you meant you wanted me to provide a source for where you are pinning anon on his claim being an absolute. I kind of assumed that someone this interested in oracles and the oracle space would at least know which project is leading across all metrics. It didn't even cross my mind that someone would need a source for that.

I mean, even the report you spent so much time arguing about (https://ir.citi.com/_tpHpW8MfaZ1QXwGmP1JGMGXXI95qXm3IMJzUJScLMb6XIjtOls6EbDehXMR3B_o9Opi7mdc5tQ%3D)) clearly states that Chainlink is the leading provider. Granted, this was in 2021 but unless you can point me to a bigger oracle provider I am going to assume this is unchanged.

Further, Sergey was quoted stating that Chainlink is providing 60-90% of all marketdata in DeFi: https://www.protocol.com/fintech/crypto-oracles-chainlink
Again, his claim might be bullshit but I have not seen any of the competitors rectify this, which leaves me to assume they are doing way, way smaller numbers than Chainlink. Care to provide sources for a Chainlink competitor having a edge over Chainlink (in any metric)? I would be glad to take a look at it and invest if it looks good.

[Anonymous No.54447641]

there's a gazillion moneys and if link takes only 0.01% of all the moneys we'll get a lot of money too

[Anonymous No.54447656]

>>54443205
>>54443316
token not needed

[Anonymous No.54447666]

>>54443333
but it's red

[Anonymous No.54447667]

>>54447543
I have absolutely no clue if a project is actually out-competing chainlink, nor do I care, all I know for certain is that the network traffic has been continuously declining across every metric for the past year and a half or so, and this, paired along with this latest report arguably indicates that something happened to chainlink's monopoly that forced citibank at the very least to acknowledge the existence of other oracle projects.
>inb4 source
https://dune.com/gsm/Chainlink

[Anonymous No.54448012]

>>54447667
>I have absolutely no clue if a project is actually out-competing chainlink, nor do I care
A goalpost just flew over my house!
>paired along with this latest report arguably indicates that something happened to chainlink's monopoly
According to your source, Chainlink has lost a lot of usage compared to 2022. If its monopoly was broken this means a competitor would have gobbled up this market share, yet there is no evidence of this. The only thing I could find is pic related, from the same website you pulled your source from (https://dune.com/sergiimk/Oracle-Comparison-(Chainlink-API3-Band-Ocean)).. I'm not sure how accurate this data is since those sudden drops look suspect, but nevertheless it paints a clear picture: Chainlink is miles ahead of the competition.

Therefore the most straightforward assumption in this case would be that Chainlink usage decreased since interest in the crypto market as a whole decreased. Which is in line with expectations of a bear market.

To circle back to the Citi argument: I think it is not weird at all that 2 years after publishing their first bit on oracles, Citi now has a deeper understanding of the subject and includes the wider oracle landscape instead of just naming the market leader. To imply this means they are somehow aware of Chainlink having lost its status monopoly to some unknown, unnamed and unfindable competitor is odd to say the least. As someone who used Occam's Razor further up in the thread to make a point, you are coming up with some weirdly improbable theories that would not pass Occam's Razor at all.

[Anonymous No.54448027]

>>54448012
Forgot pic.

[Anonymous No.54448120]

>>54447166
>19 pbtid
>still this mad about Citi saying Link could overtake BTC

lmao

[Anonymous No.54448146]

>>54448012
>>54448027
>404 Page Not Found or Private
???
your link doesn't seem to be working
>to imply this means they are somehow aware of Chainlink having lost its status monopoly to some unknown, unnamed and unfindable competitor is odd to say the least.
it's fairly straightforward, on the first report they refer to LINK as "the leading such provider", and with the estimation of it eventually overtaking BTC it is perfectly clear they come across as overtly bullish
once again allow me to point the timing of this report, 2 months before the market wide ATH, as well as citibank's source about chainlink being a decrypt article.
on the second report, no such description is applied to any project, and not only that, but citibank outlines not one, not two, but 16 different projects across 9 different blockchains
I'd say my assumption of LINK losing its monopoly status is reasonable but whatever

[Anonymous No.54448209]

>>54447213
No I'm curious, shill me on API3 or band, please, explain why they will become serious competitors in the oracle space since that appears to be what you believe

[Anonymous No.54448231]

>>54448209
I don't believe they actually are, my overarching point is that both of citibank's reports mean nothing

[Anonymous No.54448290]

>>54448231
>both of citibank's reports mean nothing
If it means nothing, then why are you crying so hard about it?

[Anonymous No.54448326]

>>54443333
MASON!?

[Anonymous No.54448354]

>>54443029
Imagine if RIO does 2000% by eod and I can buy you and your wife

https://twitter.com/AltcoinistDAO/status/1642914539011207169?s=20

[Anonymous No.54448375]

>>54448231
the real blackpill is that everything means nothing

[Anonymous No.54448406]

>>54448231
I don't think you actually believe that, I think you're just stuck in the all or nothing mentality many neets who overinvested in link without any sort of plans in life had, where they actually unironically needed 1k dollar link for their real life to begin.

When you carry that mindset, everything is meaningless and you're just bitter at all times until "it" happens. Even though its entirely possible that chainlink is actually just a solid long term investment in a market full of trash, and the people who buy early will be wealthy in 5 to 10 years, but because ETH and shiba inu did it in 1 year (only if you timed the top/bottom), its not enough and its a scam and fuck sirgay.

Note even for bitcoin, arguably the least scammy thing in this space, unless you bought pre 2013, or timed a couple cycles, or used leverage, it probably took you a decade to make it. Someone buying $100 bitcoin, unheard of today, would have needed to buy 40 grand worth back in 2013 just to have made it now. If you timed the low, you could have made it with 4 grand, if you bought and held for 10 years.

[Anonymous No.54448429]

it's finally happening this week. the token is needed for some reason and it will increase in value hundredfold, the wait is over

[Anonymous No.54448444]

>>54448209
only paid shills, bots, or new fags have bullish sentiment about link you fuckwit

[Anonymous No.54448461]

>>54448406
>because ETH and shiba inu did it in 1 year (only if you timed the top/bottom), its not enough and its a scam and fuck sirgay.
this but unironically
FUCK Sir Gay

[Anonymous No.54448532]

>>54443333
THAT'S IT
I'M FOREVER SHORTING LINK

[Anonymous No.54448544]

>>54448444
checked, but your bot seems to be malfunctioning, the post you quoted is asking about API3 and band, not bullish sentiment towards link

[Anonymous No.54448557]

>>54443333
Link absolutely and unequivocally FUD'd into oblivion.

[Anonymous No.54448637]

>>54448406
your rampant projection is cute but completely irrelevant to my point
I mean what I said, it means nothing
the rest of your post are revisionist history mental gymnastics trying to justify the shitcoin-tier performance of LINK
>you'd need 40 grand worth of BTC just to have made it now
literally wtf are you smoking, you could have mined over 50 BTC on a shitty laptop just a year before that

[Anonymous No.54448696]

>>54448146
The jeets that coded this website don't strip parenthesis from chart names, so me putting the source in parenthesis tripped you up.
https://dune.com/sergiimk/Oracle-Comparison-(Chainlink-API3-Band-Ocean)

>I'd say my assumption of LINK losing its monopoly status is reasonable but whatever
It is not. You are drawing connections to satisfy a pre conceived bias. Take a step back and look at the 2 reports

2021 report:
>Ctrl + F: Oracle (1 result)
>Ctrl + F: Chainlink (3 results)
>Introduces subject of oracles, names market leader, expresses general bullishness on the emerging space and by extension its market leader
Chainlink is explicitly mentioned because it is Citi's only tie into the oracle space. At this point, decentralized oracles as an investment opportunity are so unknown to Citi and the rest of the world, more people know of Chainlink than the wider space it is a part of.

2023 report:
>Ctrl + F: Oracle (115 results)
>Ctrl + F: Chainlink (3 results as sources besides the ones in the figure)
>Talks at length about the subject, what it entails, potential use cases, even goes as far as stating that blockchains are pretty much useless without them (see chapter: Oracles: A Prerequisite for Blockchain Use Cases).
Extremely fucking bullish for oracles. No doubt about it. Look at how much space is devoted to talking about oracles compared to the 2021 report. It is obvious that, since Citi has now done their research into the space, they simply refer to the general term "Oracles" instead of Chainlink specifically. It is also pretty evident that, with like 80% of active oracle users, Chainlink is for all intents and purposes synonymous to the generalized term "Oracles" as used in this report. Call it cope, call it mental gymnastics, call it whatever. I don't care, investors don't care and neither does Citi. They are shilling you decentralized oracles and the one dominating the decentralized oracle space is none other than Chainlink (ticker: LINK).

[Anonymous No.54448720]

>>54443040
>>54443041
Look at this losers with their scripts

[Anonymous No.54448722]

>>54443029
Chainlink already made me rich beyond my wildest dreams, its insane that this will continue and I will become even richer.
overall the FUD is funny to me because I know it posted by absolute Losers who dont even have 1% of my networth.

[Anonymous No.54448728]

>>54448696
>Call it cope, call it mental gymnastics, call it whatever. I don't care, investors don't care and neither does Citi
elegantly put anon, thanks
>They are shilling you decentralized oracles
they also shilled me the "leading oracle provider" right at peak mania, I'm inclined to ignore them and their marketing pieces

[Anonymous No.54448751]

>>54448728
>I am a salty loser
kek well said

[Anonymous No.54448797]

>>54448728
From the 2021 report after mentioning Chainlink:
>Thus, a token that helps to facilitate the growth of the on-chain ecosystem may also gain prominence over Bitcoin in time as it becomes increasingly critical to the operation of the blockchain infrastructure.
>It is thus already possible to envision a commerce-linked or infrastructure-linked coin that may eventually eclipse Bitcoin. More such possibilities may emerge. Innovation in the chain-based ecosystem is continuing apace and today’s offerings may yet give way to a new invention that garners more attention and assets than Bitcoin.

You:
>They made me buy Chainlink at the top!

Sucks to suck, I guess.

[Anonymous No.54448846]

>>54448728
>he bought the Top
HAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.54448885]

>>54448797
nice red herring, when did I state that they forced me to buy link at the top? I simply stated that they shilled link at the top, is this statement untrue?
you sound awfully similar to CLG btw

[Anonymous No.54449062]

>>54448885
From the excerpt I quoted:
>may
>in time
>possible to envision
>may eventually
>may emerge
>today’s offerings may yet give way

You:
>They shilled Chainlink at the top!

They mentioned Chainlink at the top. They also took extreme caution to not shill anything in their conclusion besides some vague predictions. Then they went on to shill the absolute fuck out of decentralized oracles 2 years later without, again, explicitly shilling anything. It seems to me your reading comprehension is just not very high and you are incapable of inferring anything of value from given sources, as long as it is in conflict with whatever negative spin your bias ascribed to it prior.

>you sound awfully similar to CLG btw
I don't follow Twitter ecelebs. If you fags didn't incessantly post Twitter screenshots here I would be blissfully unaware of that abbreviation.

[Anonymous No.54449118]

>>54449062
>Developers that utilize the Chainlink network pay with the protocol’s native token, LINK. Thus, a token that helps to facilitate the growth of the on-chain ecosystem may also gain prominence over Bitcoin in time as it becomes increasingly critical to the operation of the blockchain infrastructure
>vague prediction
I'd say they were extremely specific and clear.
>they didn't shill it, they "mentioned" it
so your sole objection is the verb "shilled"?
kek

[Anonymous No.54449142]

>>54443256
Where is that alleged USD api endpoint, my fellow brown skinned poster?

[Anonymous No.54449382]

>>54449118
>so your sole objection is the verb "shilled"?
You're moving those posts again, friend. You're also still not reading attentively:
>Developers that utilize the Chainlink network pay with the protocol’s native token, LINK.
They explain how Chainlink, the market leader, operates.
>Thus, a token
A token, not Chainlink specifically. A token (like Chainlink):
>that helps to facilitate the growth of the on-chain ecosystem may
MAY
>also gain prominence over Bitcoin in time
IN TIME
>as it becomes increasingly critical to the operation of the blockchain infrastructure

A TOKEN LIKE CHAINLINK MAY GAIN PROMINENCE OVER BITCOIN IN TIME

Does a sentence like this mean /biz/ will cum all over itself and laugh at you for not believing them? Yes. Does it mean Citi told you to buy Chainlink at the top? No. In their 2023 report they seem very, very interested in teaching their readers about smart contracts, decentralized oracles and tokenized assets however. Probably a red herring.

[Anonymous No.54449459]

>>54449382
>denial: the post
I'm sorry that won't do, it still looks like the definition of "shilling" to me, could you break it down for me word for word?
>t. the grand master of pilpul

[Anonymous No.54449494]

>>54449459
No, I have other things to do now. But I think you get the gist of it even if you're trying to pilpul some more. Can't pil a dead pul, as they like to say.

[Anonymous No.54449535]

>>54449494
unironically no, your hairsplitting pilpul tactics haven't convinced me in the slightest that this particular excerpt of the citibank report is not explicitly shilling chainlink, but thanks for trying

[Anonymous No.54449574]

>>54449535
I think I already conceded that your lack of reading comprehension seems to be holding you back when it comes to interpreting sources. Not really my problem though, is it.

[Anonymous No.54449583]

>>54449574
fyi I think your condescension and false arrogance are getting old

[Anonymous No.54449600]

>>54447228
What do you think about this retarded market?

[Anonymous No.54449614]

>>54449583
Pot, kettle >>54446143

[Anonymous No.54449623]

>Imagine if chainlink secures only 10% of everything in pic related
It won't.

[Anonymous No.54449651]

>>54449614
>no u

[Anonymous No.54449667]

dinosaur tech that has already been replaced on web3 with https outcalls

[Anonymous No.54449677]

>>54449623
You’re right? It will secure 100%

[Anonymous No.54449704]

>>54449651
Technically it was more of a
>you started it!
But I have to admit I would feel no remorse dunking on you even if you didn't start off this thread by being a pil pulling little pissant.

[Anonymous No.54449780]

how do investors get paid back for the money we gave Chainlink to do research projects? I thought if they were going to have a "monopoly", it would have made us money too, but there's clearly no connection. I'm not in for the tech/sportsball angle

[Anonymous No.54449787]

>>54449704
>anon claims that chainlink covers all four bases enabling asset tokenization
>anon posts a report which supposedly proves that thesis, when it doesn't, in fact all it does is list every oracle project on every major blockchain, irrelevant to his opening thesis
>((I)) call him out for deception
>anon flips ((me)) off
>but ((I)) am the one hairsplitting
your (lack of) intelligence really doesn't warrant you being arrogant, at all

[Anonymous No.54449918]

>>54449787
Why are you in this thread? What do you gain from these interactions?

[Anonymous No.54449990]

>>54449787
Right from the start you have been misinterpreting pretty much everything that has been directed at you, either due to incompetence or malice. Forgive me for being arrogant, but I feel pretty smart in the vicinity of actual retards.

>>anon claims that chainlink covers all four bases enabling asset tokenization
>>anon posts a report which supposedly proves that thesis, when it doesn't, in fact all it does is list every oracle project on every major blockchain, irrelevant to his opening thesis
He didn't post that report to prove that thesis, he posted that report because it was the source of the image he posted lmao. He did not provide source for Chainlink covering all 4 of those bases because I guess he thought everybody already knew.

>Decentralized identity
DECO
>ZK proofs
DECO
>Oracles
Self explanatory
>Secure bridges
CCIP

According to anon, the Citi report is bullish because of the 4 enablers mentioned in their report, he believes Chainlink has got all 4 of them covered (even if those products are unreleased).

You're telling me you went on a 30 post pil pul spree because of on an incorrect assumption brought on by lack of reading comprehension? Top kek

[Anonymous No.54450084]

>>54449990
are you him? that would make sense
>(even if those products are unreleased)
self explanatory indeed
>You're telling me you went on a 30 post spree
(You) and apparently (You)r multiple ids kept doubling down, and accusing me of what you kept doing in true jewish fashion (extreme pilpul and goalpost moving) I had no choice.
You're telling me you got so triggered on behalf of a random anon that you felt compelled to quarrel with me for 19pbtid out of your inability to "deal with unfairness against a fellow anon"? how benevolent of you!

[Anonymous No.54450114]

>>54447666
Lol, lmao

[Anonymous No.54450281]

>>54450084
>are you him? that would make sense
So far you have accused me of being CLG and now another anon. Is this your to go to strategy when outclassed?
>>(even if those products are unreleased)
>self explanatory indeed
His words, not mine. Personally I'm waiting for CCIP before making judgement. Since no competitor has got these services up and running either I think it's not fair to dock to many points off of Chainlink's score for that though. But, as we established already, you are not interested in Chainlink's competition, you are merely interested in shitting on Chainlink.

>I had no choice.
>I MISREAD SOMEONES POST, DOUBLED DOWN WHEN CONFRONTED AND ACCUSE OTHERS OF PILPULL WHEN I HAVE OBVIOUSLY BEEN PILPULLING THIS WHOLE TIME TO SAVE FACE
>I HAD NO CHOICE!!
Pretty ironic that you replied "the jew cries out in pain as he strikes you" to me >>54446863. You have been the epitome of a slithering jew in this thread.

>You're telling me you got so triggered on behalf of a random anon that you felt compelled to quarrel with me for 19pbtid out of your inability to "deal with unfairness against a fellow anon"? how benevolent of you!
I thought you already noticed, but I enjoy dunking on reading comprehensionlets and argumentlets. Especially if they are noLinkers.

[Anonymous No.54450302]

>>54443333
>>54447666
Le praise kek

[Anonymous No.54450323]

>>54450281
zach, there is more to life than this

[Anonymous No.54450363]

>>54450323
>muh zach based king
Have you ever considered how weird it is that you guys are obsessed with CLG, when even borderline cultists on this board want nothing to do with him?

[Anonymous No.54450380]

>>54450281
>he keeps insisting that I misinterpreted random anon's intentions
>he keeps insisting that citi's reports are bullish but they aren't actually shilling
>he keeps insisting that he's entitled to be arrogant while he continuously makes an ass out of himself no matter how many ids he switches
>you don't understand! he screeches
>on a thread literally titled "Chainlink will make you rich"
lmao my fucking sides
I'm just wondering why don't you try this shit on reddit? why don't you try to rejuvenate r/LINKTRADER for example, you already have mods from the actual team there and you have multiple tools to control the narrative efficiently.
why waste so much capital and energy trying to convince autists on 4chan, accept it guise, they won't start memeing for you again, for free.
>>54450363
have you ever considered that it's pretty weird claiming you don't even know the guy yet you consistently use his arguments word for word?
pretty weird if you ask me

[Anonymous No.54450407]

>>54449918
He’s here because of this >>54448406
, he’s only crying projection because it’s true, like the fags that claim you must secretly be gay for calling them out as faggots.

[Anonymous No.54450423]

>>54446581

[Anonymous No.54450444]

>>54443333
linkers btfo yet again

[Anonymous No.54450445]

>>54450380
What even is your argument? You’re kinda all over the place. Does it just boil down to link bad?

[Anonymous No.54450456]

>>54450445
go shill to reddit, no more free maymays for you bruh

[Anonymous No.54450567]

>>54450380
>>he keeps insisting that I misinterpreted random anon's intentions
You did. Did or did you not think the citi report was linked to prove his assumption? If you did you misinterpreted his intentions. Doubling, tripling even quadrupling down is not going to change that.
>>he keeps insisting that citi's reports are bullish but they aren't actually shilling
Well isn't that a nicely constructed straw man. Citi report 2021 mentioned Chainlink: bullish. Citi report 2023 shilled smart contracts, asset tokenization, decentralized oracles and showed a picture containing Chainlink (and other dec oracles): Bullish. Amazing how demoralized/buckbroken bagholders like you manage to spin everything into a negative.
>>he keeps insisting that he's entitled to be arrogant while he continuously makes an ass out of himself no matter how many ids he switches
You can't keep up with me. It is what it is anon. You are a featherweight trying to box a heavyweight. A midwit out of his depth. No desperate "s-samefag!" or "CLG!" uttering is going to change that.
>>on a thread literally titled "Chainlink will make you rich"
Not sure what to make of this. For the record, I think OP is a naïve retard. He will probably make it though, because he is most likely a stubborn retard as well.

>why waste so much capital and energy trying to convince autists on 4chan
Heh, flipping the script. Nice.

>have you ever considered that it's pretty weird claiming you don't even know the guy yet you consistently use his arguments word for word?
Like I said, it's crazy how fuddies know and revere CLG more than actual Linkies. I read nothing that guy puts out. I just read Chainlink blogposts whenever they drop and have read the whitepaper, yet you are intimately aware of his arguments to the point you can recognize them when used in discussion?

[Anonymous No.54450600]

>>54450444
CHECKED

[Anonymous No.54450643]

>>54450567
>doubling down on hairsplitting and nuances
kek keep going at it CLG, or rather, Crypto Oracle??

[Anonymous No.54450663]

>>54450567
holy fuck this level of cope
absolute COPE

[Anonymous No.54450725]

>>54450643
>Crypto Oracle
Another CT celeb?

[Anonymous No.54450787]

>I swear I don't know these dudes!
real smooth Zach

[Anonymous No.54450856]

Seems like we broke him. Back to Twitter, boys!

>t. Zach CLG Crypto Oracle Anon Samefag Apustaya

[Anonymous No.54450884]

>>54450856
bro you seriously trying to convince me that you're a hardcore OG linkie and you haven't heard of this
https://smartcontentpublication.medium.com/completing-the-god-protocols-a-comprehensive-overview-of-chainlink-in-2021-746220a0e45
or that you're not aware of the latest Sergey podcast with these guys who actually authored that piece
https://open.spotify.com/episode/13O2EbxedAwDqiScOvO9ZP?si=6ihlYxxQSc68mBEQkDSzGg&app_destination=copy-link&nd=1
you mean to tell me you are absolutely clueless, when this board kept talking about this for weeks
the gaslighting efforts are off the fucking charts

[Anonymous No.54450983]

>>54443333
>>54447666
>>54448444
>>54450444
Is there something going on in this thread, or what?
Is this the real April Fools joke, and the other thing was just a cover?

[Anonymous No.54451006]

>>54450983
Oh neat.
My ID managed to get both my pronoun 'Xe' AND moe 'M03' :3
I love Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.54451052]

>>54445742
It already did a 5x from current price on speculation alone. Imagine what utility demand PLUS speculation could bring... I know youlre here to fud but seriously, $1000 is going to happen and when it does it'll happen quickly. $100 is small potatoes.

[Anonymous No.54451115]

>>54450884
>https://smartcontentpublication.medium.com/completing-the-god-protocols-a-comprehensive-overview-of-chainlink-in-2021-746220a0e45
I realize this is hard to grasp for anons that joined /biz/ post 2020, but you have to understand that I and many other anons that post here were actively participating in the same threads those articles are based on. So no, I did not know who Crypto Oracle is, because I don't visit Twitter and I don't read rehashed 4chan threads in literal who blogpost form.
>or that you're not aware of the latest Sergey podcast with these guys who actually authored that piece
Never listened to that podcast before, never heard CLG speak before listening to excerpts from it when it was incessantly posted here by fudders telling me it's over. Had no clue Crypto Oracle was involved because I did not know of his existence before you mentioned him ITT.
>you mean to tell me you are absolutely clueless, when this board kept talking about this for weeks
>this board
Kek, of course you were one of them. Top buying nuLinkers are truly the worst.

[Anonymous No.54451160]

>>54451115
>I'm an aksual oldfag pleb I made dur crypto oracle!
>hurr you bought the top durr
ok bro, sure you have no fucking clue

[Anonymous No.54451178]

look i like chainlink dont get me wrong
its just not gonna be as big as you think
$15 in 10 years sounds about right

[Anonymous No.54451198]

>>54451160
Great, and you didn’t take profits and are still “waiting for your real life to begin”, nobody cares.

[Anonymous No.54451225]

>>54451198
look how fast he's switching goalposts lmao
I did take profits, and that's why I able to be critical and objective
I'm completely disillusioned
keep them projections coming though

[Anonymous No.54451271]

>>54451160
>I'm an oldfag that got rich off of Chainlink but I spend my days ranting how Citibank shilling Chainlink and Oracles is actually not bullish
>Also anyone that can string a coherent sentence together regarding Chainlink is actually le Twitter celeb that I follow religiously while fudding on /biz/
Jeez, what a way to pull the ladder up behind you. These last few years really broke a great deal of you guys. This is what happens when you subscribe to the "my real life will start once this investment takes off" way of life, and then never sell once it actually does take off.

[Anonymous No.54451273]

>>54451225
Right and you post out of the goodness of your heart to help fellow anons

[Anonymous No.54451296]

>>54451225
>look how fast he's switching goalposts lmao
>he
You're still peddling that samefag copout?

[Anonymous No.54451372]

>>54451296
The projection claim tells me who he is already, responds the same way in every thread, if you hit a nerve it’s projection projection because he has to be unique and special and undefinable even if his presence and posting makes no logical sense.

[Anonymous No.54451408]

>>54451271
>more projection about broken anons
notice how the jew shifts tactics in the blink of an eye
>>54451273
no, I remain critical as always, you nutards are the only thing that's actually changed, mindless cheerleaders constantly deflecting and avoiding any at all criticism .
as an other anon said, most of us were and still are obsessed with Chainlink, regardless of whether we're still holding it or not.
being critical and constantly scrutinizing this project (which has set the standard absurdly high all by its own) can do only good for the project in the long run. (see staking unlocking, more aggressive marketing, Kemal forced to do a product update etc)
what you retards are doing is literally dooming this project to fail by exhibiting all kinds of cult like behaviors, and the latest instance of community advocates flipping off holders is the final nail in the coffin, so if anybody reads this, please restrain your midwit advocates from trying to force their shitty narratives on 4chan, that ship has sailed until you actually deliver staking or anything meaningful.
have fun I guess, you certainly tried a lot to bring LINK to this sorry state

[Anonymous No.54451459]

>>54451408
>mindless cheerleaders constantly deflecting and avoiding any at all criticism
There's plenty of that, true. But what you and a few others are doing is just the inverse of this, mindlessly critisizing and avoiding any positivity. Do you feel like it's your moral duty to act like this as some form of counter balance?

[Anonymous No.54451495]

>>54451459
I'm not mindlessly criticizing anything, I'm being honest and unbiased.
my honest opinion is that citi's reports are overblown and meaningless.
anyway, this is a "Chainlink will make you rich" thread so I should obviously gtfo

[Anonymous No.54451532]

>>54451408
>>more projection about broken anons
You'd say your behavior is healthy, not broken? 115 results for the word "Oracle" in a Citibank report anno 2023, and you type up a storm explaining how that is actually not bullish like some deranged buck broken bag holder. How would you interpret this behavior if you were some random anon lurking this thread?

[Anonymous No.54451562]

>>54451532
why is this report more bullish than this?
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/09/28/swift-partners-with-crypto-data-provider-chainlink-on-cross-chain-protocol-in-tradfi-play/
or this?
https://www.newsbtc.com/news/chainlink-to-work-with-chinas-national-blockchain-services-network/
or this?
https://www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2021/04/blockchain-newsletter-for-march-exploring-blockchain-and-interoperability/
get my point anon? unless each and any of these developments manage to bring more value and traffic to the network, it is a nothing burger

[Anonymous No.54451598]

>>54451495
>I'm being honest and unbiased
What has been your favorite development for chainlink so far in 2023?
>my honest opinion is that citi's reports are overblown and meaningless.
I originally posted that image from citi's report just highlighting how it was interesting that all 4 conditions for adoption were in progress/being addressed by chainlink. No other project is working on even 2 of those requirements

[Anonymous No.54451622]

>>54451562
>unless each and any of these developments manage to bring more value and traffic to the network, it is a nothing burger
Citi made a report regarding oracles and a thread was made about it, no one ITT is claiming this report is taking us to $1k EOY

[Anonymous No.54451629]

>>54451562
Ah, hello Tradelens, Anon.

[Anonymous No.54451637]

>>54451598
>What has been your favorite development for chainlink so far in 2023?
obviously functions, because it's the only notable development so far, I'm not exactly impressed by it either.
>>54451622
checked, understandable, have a nice day

[Anonymous No.54451685]

>>54451562
>absolutely nothing matters until price go up
but anon that's not how markets work. What will happen is some combination of speculators and insiders will push the price when they are ready to. At that point you will have missed it. There is never going to be a point where you can discuss link, feel confident the price will go up exponentially, buy, and then just watch it happen right away. It will never happen. Speculators or insiders will price you out and you will forever sit on the sidelines.

So you can either conclude that the project is an elaborate scam, that it will never accomplish anywhere near the goals they set out to, or that it might happen and you do not know when. If your conclusion is #3, and you aren't holding some link, you do not understand markets and you will miss it. That appears to be what you're saying.

If however you are implying it is an elaborate scam, or they will never accomplish their goals, then your obsession with chainlink makes zero sense, because if that was your mindset you'd be done discussing it.

[Anonymous No.54451691]

>>54451637
>I'm not exactly impressed by it either.
What do you think is wrong with it?

[Anonymous No.54451723]

>>54451562
>unless each and any of these developments manage to bring more value and traffic to the network, it is a nothing burger
Fuck me, you're dense. The Citibank report is a SYMPTOM of more value and traffic entering the network. Of course it does not directly foster network growth; it illustrates how the oracle space is steadily developing and starting to make waves, which is picked up by institutional players. There is no universe where Citi going from 1 mention of oracles to 115 mentions in two years time is a nothingburger. If you were looking for signs that you're invested in a brand new, emerging sector with novel usecases, you found it.

[Anonymous No.54451748]

>>54451685
fucking hell way to miss the point
network traffic ≠ price
the actual tokenomics triggered by staking is the only thing that fucking matters and has ever mattered, and that can only be achieved by reaching sufficient network traffic, which can secure the fucking network.
and then you ignore all that and spout bullshit about "moon imminent diamond hands murhines" like a literal deranged schizo
>noooo it's speculatiohn tat drives teh price!
then you literally admit that LINK is no better than SHIB, congrats
>>54451691
it's not exactly groundbreaking is all
>>54451723
>it's a huge deal!
bigger than SWIFT and BSN you say?

[Anonymous No.54451799]

>>54451723
oh sorry misread it, so you're saying traffic is entering the network as we speak and in just 2 more short weeks we'll be able to see it right?

[Anonymous No.54451810]

>>54451748
Staking is the only thing that removes link from being chained to bitcoin and the rest of the market and controlled by speculation, yes. Your position is nothing matters until then, but the mistake you're making is assuming the price will just remain stagnant until staking 1.0. That's already been proven wrong, anyone that ignored link until now because "muh staking" missed the first speculative wave and has been unable to buy below 5 dollars for 3 years now, and quite possibly/likely never again.
>then you literally admit LINK is no better than SHIB, congrats
no anon, again, something can have both a fundamental value and a speculative value, it isn't one or the other. Speculation can still price you out of owning the asset at a lower price when fundamentals kick in, however. And it already has if you ignored link in 2018. As I said earlier in the thread, you have an all or nothing mindset, you're unable to view any of this with any sort of nuance.

[Anonymous No.54451824]

>>54451748
Hey anon I've been following this thread and I've come to the conclusion that you're dirt poor and have a shitty life. It's really tragically obvious.
I sold on the way up with an average buyin of 1.45 by the way so my life is pretty fucking great.
I wouldn't usually be so petty but I find you're bitterness to be cringe as fuck and I thought I'd stick the knife in because it's funny.
Enjoy being poor kek.

[Anonymous No.54451853]

>>54451810
>just speculate until staking bro
no thanks, I've discovered that plenty of alts are much better for speculation purposes, just because they haven't attached their identity to fundamentals so they can get away without actually delivering anything, unlike LINK.
>>54451824
I know you've been following it, you have like 12pbtid
forgot to switch ids fren?

[Anonymous No.54451858]

>>54451799
>44 pbtid
Jesus bro just say “token not needed”

[Anonymous No.54451859]

>>54451748
So you're in the "I'm in it for the tech, retail not needed, institutions not needed" crowd, but to the extreme. Gotcha.

That meme is so spot on. SWIFT mentions their PoC with Chainlink, XRP and QNT baggies somehow conclude this is bullish for their tokens and they pump, while Linkies are saying "just a PoC? nothingburger".

[Anonymous No.54451882]

>>54450856
Eres un cuckoldo
Estas en una secta
Has invertido en un esquema Ponzi
Estas perdiendo dinero
Glorificas a un gordo ladrón ruso llamado Sergey
Eres un incel

[Anonymous No.54451894]

>>54451853
>no thanks, I've discovered that plenty of alts are much better for speculation purposes, just because they haven't attached their identity to fundamentals so they can get away without actually delivering anything, unlike LINK.
>just time the market bro
no thanks, I'm sure you nailed it perfectly with Solana and dogcoins though and that's why you're here seething about chainlink day after day.

[Anonymous No.54451914]

>>54451859
bro, you're literally zach
come on, you've posted that exact xrp qnt baggie argument like a gazillion times already
unashamed

[Anonymous No.54451917]

>>54451853
>forgot to switch ids fren?
You have forty five posts and you have the gall to call me out for twelve. This is what I mean by calling you cringe. You're unashamedly hypocritical and use piss-weak strawmans whenever possible, twisting the words of the people you're arguing with in a way that would make any Jew blush.
Oh and I'm not sure what you're getting at with the switched ID, anon, but I will note you didn't try and argue that you weren't dirt poor and that your life sucks. I knew I was right.
I'm already rich by the way, from selling Chainlink. Do you understand how rich I'm going to be when it pops off again? Does it hurt to realise that you bought my bags at the last ATH? That now I've been buying back in for months and when it reaches 50 again I'll have more wealth than you can genuinely dream of?
:)
Okay I have to go, some friends of mine are planning a trip to Portugal in June and have asked me to come with so I'm going to go plan that with them. Enjoy spending your time 'taking down the evil linkies' hahahaha.

[Anonymous No.54451924]

>>54443029
Yeah. Imagine. And then keep imagining because it's never gonna happen.

[Anonymous No.54451938]

>>54451917
He's arguing that everyone who disagrees with him has to be the same person due to cognitive dissonance, it can't be that multiple people find him wrong, so obviously its all the same person (CLG apparently) stalking him.

[Anonymous No.54451964]

>daily reminder
Chainlink is a token for submissive cuckolds

Link will NEVER pump
Your bags will NEVER make you rich
You will NEVER have sex

[Anonymous No.54451978]

>>54451914
>He still hasn't realized Twitterfags trawl this board for hot takes and narratives
It's so tiresome. You should go back, unironically. Having an avatar and knowing other people's avatars would do you good.

[Anonymous No.54451988]

>>54451914
>Fuddies accusing everyone they interact with is CLG
>bagholders accusing everyone they interact with is a bulgarian discord tranny
Two sides of the same coin

[Anonymous No.54452000]

>>54451917
>I'm not sure what you're getting at with the switched ID
your introduction was kinda weird, I already knew you've been following the thread, your first post was 13 hours ago.
good for you anon enjoy your trip, I hope you spent less time on 4chinz while you're there
>>54451978
>s-s-stop calling me zach reeeeee
>>54451988
but this guy is zach bro, you know it

[Anonymous No.54452286]

>>54451685
Based response and calmly destroys bluster boy. Respect.

[Sage No.54452438]

>34 posts by this mentally ill porn addict

[Anonymous No.54452719]

>>54452438
dude ur a cuck

[Anonymous No.54452746]

>>54452438
>chaincuck resorts to retarded 2015 /pol/ cartoons
yikes

[Anonymous No.54452784]

>>54451824
i know you are but what am i?

[Anonymous No.54452830]

>>54443256
>you can just call the USD-based API instead
the one that market buys LINK to pay the validators? Cool cool.

[Anonymous No.54452952]

>>54444933
Don't forget twitter where they post biz screenshots of chainlink shilling

[Anonymous No.54452965]

>>54443029
no it won't. Don't buy 2017 shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.54453240]

This entire thread has convinced me of nothing other than none of you retards can be trusted and that crypto is a scam, one way or another.

[Anonymous No.54453592]

>>54448722
What’s even funnier is most of them are impotent porn addicts which makes sense why they project with their cuckold memes KEK

[Anonymous No.54453730]

>>54443333
Checked

[Anonymous No.54454179]

>>54443333
holy shit
WHAT

[Anonymous No.54454733]

>>54443333

Praise Kek

[Anonymous No.54454967]

>>54454733
Checked 1k eoy confirmed

[Anonymous No.54454996]

Holy shit people are still shilling link? I havent been here since i sold back in 2021. Ive just been enjoying my retirement by traveling.
Link looks completely dead to me.. Its most likely gonna be a slow bleed for years with the occasional spikes. Just look at every old alt coins chart. I suggest you guys just buy BTC, as for me im out of crypto for good because i already have more then enough to live. I checked on /biz/ because i saw dogecoin on twitter. Goodluck to you anons

[Anonymous No.54455027]

>>54454996
Great to have you back after all this time, anon! Its touching you remembered to pop in and care for my financial welfare and I just sold my Link stack on the basis of that hot tip. Life saver!

[Anonymous No.54455315]

>>54451810
>pulls out old shill writeup
>adds a “1.0” after the word staking
>erases $10, inserts $5

Lmao nobody moves goalposts better than Link culties. You guys put the gamestoppers to shame

>it was always a 10-30 year hold marines

[Anonymous No.54455347]

>>54451853
Well said. I agree and am doing the same. It would take a monumental effort to get even a 2 or 3x out of Link at this point. Plenty of alts did that this year already.

[Anonymous No.54455379]

>>54451917
You dont come across rich though. Unnecessarily qualifying your life to anonymous dudes on the internet isnt an act of a confident man

[Anonymous No.54455511]

>>54445247
Don't you understand the purpose of the price suppression?
Sergey is the biggest holder on the planet and they are forcing him to sell a lot at a low price.

[Anonymous No.54455538]

Nuclear missiles controlled by smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.54455811]

>>54445858
that's nothing bro go to a btc conference
>ah yeah we are still the best means of payment out there umm but adoption has been slow and in some cases has gone backwards so we are at negative adoption right now but very soon we may see positive growth maybe
>yes btc is the future no it will not grant you additional freedoms except the means of access to over 6 million types of burgers through our partnership with GrubHub!
>*cough*
>CBDCs guys they are the real killers they will take away your freedoms BTC is non-inflationary so it can't do that
>Sovereign Citizens do not need to pay tax that's the whole point
>if you want to mine BTC as a business you need to apply in writing for Sovereign Small Business tax exemption status
>Praise be unto Satoshi our mystery cult leader OOOOOOOMMMMMM HUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMM
>yes there is no substitute for BTC all these fake alt coins out there do not consume enough energy to be granted tax exemption status by the government lolcows
>Yes BTC is counter culture and revolutionary you are just late! Yes, question from the audience?
>Why would anyone buy now if they are late? Doesn't that mean they missed out?
>How does paying a bigger electricity bill stop the government from bailing out the bankers?
>Escort this fudfag out of the conference thank you #blocked #swish
>Pay your electricity bill monthly folks avoid beaches and you won't have anything to worry about
Getting pretty sad watching these boomers year after year talk tough after they all got locked down with the rest of us goy slaves

[Anonymous No.54455903]

>>54455811
>Yes BTC is counter culture and revolutionary you are just late! Yes, question from the audience?
>Why would anyone buy now if they are late? Doesn't that mean they missed out?
>How does paying a bigger electricity bill stop the government from bailing out the bankers?
kek

[Anonymous No.54456027]

>>54443029
The massive amount of FUD in this thread is actually making me want to stop fudding. Too many shills with IP’s out of poo-land. My hatred of fudding pajeets is stronger than my dislike of LINK. Guess I’ll have to buy some now. Look what shitskins are making me do. Fuckkk.

[Anonymous No.54456060]

>>54456027
>oomg reverse FUD made me buy a shitty investment asset
you are dumb

[Anonymous No.54456120]

what's with the heavy chainlink fud?

I'm just going to accumulate a suicide stack in case this is a coordinated FUD campaign to keep LINK out of the hands of regular humans

[Anonymous No.54456146]

>>54456060
You are a smelly fucking pajeet and I continue to live day by day just to spite you and your disgusting race of literal poo worshippers. I hate you, and will continue to live the rest of my life just to subvert and inflict as much suffering to pajeets as possible.

[Sage No.54456282]

The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

[Anonymous No.54456287]

>>54443333
Stupid asshole

[Anonymous No.54457791]

>>54451748
>hurr speculation doesn't matter
>only the actual tokenomics triggered by staking matter
"Actual tokenomics triggered by staking" is when Chainlink enables and captures value from smart securities, smart derivatives, etc.
Guess what; securities and derivatives are themselves largely speculative.

[Anonymous No.54458001]

[Anonymous No.54459696]

>>54443256
API's that aren't decentralized are less costly than some Government ran and secured API endpoint.