/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.54276491]

The AVAX C-chain has been down for an hour

[Anonymous No.54276571]

>>54276491
anybody seeing this shit?

[Anonymous No.54276618]

Doesn't seem to be a problem

[Anonymous No.54276648]

>>54276491
Another reason why matic is better. Or was that bitcoin cash? Oh well... better luck next time turkroaches

[Anonymous No.54276650]

not my problem

[Anonymous No.54276675]

Literally fixed now faggot

[Anonymous No.54276782]

>>54276491
Should've bought icee pee

[Anonymous No.54276790]

T

[Anonymous No.54277012]

>>54276618
I love how this lie happens with every Blockchain that has problems
>Sers it's just the explorer!
It never is just the explorer

[Anonymous No.54277047]

>>54276571
Because it's 2023 and nobody has used this shit in 2 years?

[Anonymous No.54277053]

https://github.com/ava-labs/avalanchego/releases/tag/v1.9.14

[Anonymous No.54277068]

No one cares because no one uses the chain.
It doesn't have to work. The number just needs to go up.

[Anonymous No.54277093]

>>54277068
Where are you holding your AVAX then? On a CEX like a loser?

[Anonymous No.54277119]

>>54276648
>Another reason why matic is better.
It's less bad than an issue with reorgs kek

[Anonymous No.54277136]

>>54277012
Avalanche been the smoothest chain on the market for almost 3 years, zero downtime with instant finality even during insane market crashes and volatility (Time every other chain either went down or slowed significantly), Even if it's not just an explorer issue it's still a very minor problem caused by the latest update they pushed, Team already fixed it but checking internally before pushing according to the admins.

Btw, I believe the network stalled by design, Had this minor update bug occurred on chains that guarantee liveness at all cost (Ethereum for example) then the chain would keep running and get fixed on the move, Which's less secure way of approaching it for obvious reasons (we should appreciate different philosophies in different chains tho)

[Anonymous No.54277176]

>>54276491
I'm about to take the X chain down as well. Get ready for a huge, huge dip.

[Anonymous No.54277211]

>>54276491
the only reason why it happened is because of an update. They'll go back to the latest version and that's it, fixed. But I guess that is easier to make this thread so the polyshills and icpoors can raid it with their cringy memes.
I used to love this board, shit.

[Anonymous No.54277230]

>>54276491
Its back

[Anonymous No.54277261]

>>54277230
Only temporarily

[Anonymous No.54277262]

>>54276491
We're so fucking back avax sisters

[Anonymous No.54277423]

People still use AVAX? Defi and TVL are dead, everyone is moving to arbitrum

[Anonymous No.54277459]

Look at the bright side. While the chain is down nobody ca quadruple spend on it.

[Anonymous No.54278444]

>>54276491
>A website is the C-chain.
Blockchain didn't go down at all, monkey profile pics don't do their due diligence on Twitter and are all over this though calling it Solana 2.0.

[Anonymous No.54279437]

>>54277423
>arbitroon
>3 weeks finality
kek

[Anonymous No.54280770]

>>54277262
damn why is she so fat? what happened?

[Anonymous No.54280791]

>>54276571
Nobody uses the chain of the roach so they didn’t even notice.

[Anonymous No.54280849]

>It was a literal nothingburger
Jeets btfo again

[Anonymous No.54280938]

>>54277012
didn't they say that the quadruple spend they had also was just an explorer bug?

[Anonymous No.54280941]

>>54280849
why does the network need to stabilize again if it was just a block explorer issue?

[Anonymous No.54280947]

>>54280941
It was caused by a bug retard, read the tweet

[Anonymous No.54281010]

wtf is a “c chain”. I can’t believe you faggots supported crypto like this . It’s obvious at this point that most people do not have souls

[Anonymous No.54281018]

>>54280947
Fuck you straight to hell

[Anonymous No.54281099]

>>54276618
they always say this kek

[Anonymous No.54281116]

>>54277136
wrong, it went down at the start with the double spend, then again when they blamed bad nodes (it was actually mev actors and they were forced to overhaul consensus to leaderbased)

the turks lie and lie to keep their image, and you've been stupid enough to fall for it

smoothest chain in the market? There's been plenty that were NEVER down.

[Anonymous No.54281124]

>>54280941
they're such fucking liars

[Anonymous No.54281146]

>>54281116
Wait, you're telling me copy-paste chain #8 has never had any problems? I'll make sure to load up my bags immediately

[Anonymous No.54281418]

>>54277119
Avax is dogshit lmaooooo. Keep on waiting for the straight drop out of emin's dick fags. hahaha

[Anonymous No.54281427]

>>54281146
Cardano has never been down, Polkadot has never been down
>muh new consensus
wrong, avalanche is now just the same VRf leader based selection as anything else
but you probably don't know that because you're a moonboy who doesn't do proper research.

[Anonymous No.54281480]

>>54281427
>wrong, avalanche is now just the same VRf leader based selection as anything else
Wrong you fucking cringe lying niggerface, Avalanche is VM-agnostic and Snowman++ is only used for that EVM chain right now. Another fact is that Ted Yin is going to release a completely rewritten EVM++ and DB solution called Mangrove soon, so I expect them to fix many problems you fucking fudding jeet fucks have.

[Anonymous No.54281506]

>>54276648
>matic is better
sorry anon but that’s a pajeet chain. only goerli eclipses both avax, matic and what other roach pajeet Bsc chain there is

[Anonymous No.54281580]

>>54281427
Horrendously outdated chain that runs on Reddit hype (time to finality is like 10 mins, lmao) and a chain where the main selling point is an inferior version of subnets which need to get auctioned off to create value (because it wouldn't accrue naturally)

Also crypto twitter making stuff up about things they don't understand is not "proper research", btw

[Anonymous No.54281646]

the earthquake recently disrupted the roaches that mine it emin will lay some eggs in the next few minutes and spawn more dont worry

[Anonymous No.54281850]

>>54281480
Sauce?

[Anonymous No.54281949]

>>54281116
>it was actually mev actors and they were forced to overhaul consensus to leaderbased
if it was leader-based then that would mean it would be vulnerable to MEV since a leader, by definition, orders transactions on blocks and can therefore extract value via reordering, including or excluding certain transactions. Most often to create a front-running scenario that wouldn't otherwise exist if transactions were chronologically or randomly ordered.

Anyways, a long time ago the devs updated the gossip protocol (not the consensus protocol, but you're too stupid to know the difference) by adding sybil protection so that block proposals are proportional to staking power the same way consensus voting is proportional. Now both layers have sybil protection which means goodbye to all the jeet arb bots that used to spam block proposals in the gossip protocol.

[Anonymous No.54282084]

Every AVAX shill is a grassroots community marketer who gets paid in AVAX to do it. They reply to themselves with different IDs and create lots of fake interest and discussion. If you browse /biz/ for a few days you'll see how inorganic all of this is. Their objective is to make you buy AVAX, hold it and maybe even stake it (for a negative inflation adjusted yield, which they will lie about). They will manipulate you with hope, technojargon, AI waifus and dreams of riches while getting paid by higher-ups who slowly dump on retail with the tokens they created for themselves for free. Go look at EOSETH chart and read about the history of EOS. This is the exact same scam all over again for newfags like you who don't know how this works. Don't fall for it, they are masters at manipulating.

Inflation numbers:
Circulating supply Jan 27 2022: 244,852,769
https://web.archive.org/web/20220127152152/https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/avalanche

Circulating supply Jan 27 2023: 314,771,897
https://web.archive.org/web/20230127081851/https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/avalanche

(314,771,897 - 244,852,769) / 244,852,769 = 0.2856 = 29%

https://cryptoleaks.info/case-no-3

[Anonymous No.54282289]

>>54281480
yeah, the only part of the chain that matters (with actual smart contracts transacting value and thus opportunities for MEV) is ran leaderbased

wow you really showed me!

>>54281580
I dont care, I agree both chains are dumb and cringe but at least they never went down, which is what I was replying to ("smoothest chain to exist 3 years")

[Anonymous No.54282332]

>>54282289
But what is important is that avalanche is a very smooth chain for it's level of innovation and complexity

[Anonymous No.54284726]

>>54282289
It was one single chain on one single subnet you retard. Also the consensus protocol did what it was designed to do, nodes detected a disagreement and refused to make progress until the update was pushed to resolve the bug and the network healed. No loss of funds, no double spends. This was not a SOL situation where their shitty consensus algo broke and the network partitioned requiring a full restart.

Snowman++ has a soft leader mechanism that can be bypassed instantly by paying a relatively small fee for non-spammed transactions. Any node can propose a block at any time, every single node in the network participates in validating every block, all still with sub second finality and VM bounded throughput. This has been explained to you 100 times but you keep coming into our threads and shitting them up with this absolute retardation. It is wildly different from ETH or whatever other leader based protocol you want to compare to.