[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 140 KB, 2555x2555, 1612957314993.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54145122 No.54145122 [Reply] [Original]

>technical analysis

>> No.54145694
File: 1.92 MB, 696x704, 1677542218898884.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54145694

>>54145122
>dumdamental analysis

>> No.54148356

Is TA based or skem?

>> No.54148384

>>54145122
don't tell me you're doubting the meme lines

>> No.54148832

>>54145122
TA can be useful, though

>>54145694
kek'd

>> No.54149609

>>54145122
I prefer tea leaves

>> No.54149681
File: 10 KB, 640x794, technical_analysis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54149681

>>54148832
Just looking at the graph and guessing what the price will be based on your intuition and knowledge of the thing you are investing in will beat "technical analysis" most of the time

T.A. is just for midwits who feel the need to draw lines on a graph to confirm their pre-existing beliefs. If there were good technical indicators of price action alone, then you could train a bot to notice them and act on them much faster than any human trader. Hell you can train a statistical learning model to comb through all the data and act on patterns that are too subtle for people to notice.

The only way humans can beat bot traders is by considering real-world factors affecting the price action. Anyone telling you otherwise is lying or a fool themselves.

>> No.54149709
File: 39 KB, 385x396, 1611291914576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54149709

>>54145122
>religious synthesis

>> No.54149735
File: 58 KB, 680x1069, 1675190989006941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54149735

Moon schizo's are more accurate than TA fags.

>> No.54149813

TA is only good for first time entry. Anytime after that is a complete waste because they miss big moves around 50% of the time because it didn't hit their epic 61.3% fib level, or they end up buy into the 4th wave a-b-c retracement which later turns into an impulse to the downside.

>> No.54151897

>>54149813
This implies you won’t adept and continue to make the same mistake over and over. Nobody that has the capacity to buy a stock is that stupid forever
TA is mostly bs tho. Just dca into etfs and you are good

>> No.54151925

>Analysis
You're retarded if you think you can get a meaningful edge on the market in the age of HFT and sophisticated AI. You either get extremely lucky or get on a big, strategic wave and ride it. Like a kayak pulled along by the wake of an ocean liner.

>> No.54152568
File: 3 KB, 141x130, 093948384743792y.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54152568

>>54145122
Good FA beats everything else. OREID has a solid FA OP.