OH NONONONO NOLINKIES..

[Anonymous No.53448786]

It was never supposed to happen like this!!

https://blog.chain.link/self-custody-with-a-little-help-from-chainlink-deco/

[Anonymous No.53448819]

What does this mean tho?

[Anonymous No.53448824]

>>53448819
Self custody for normies is now feasible.

[Anonymous No.53448831]

>>53448819
it means you now have a mechanism to recover a lost wallet key. chainlink is the most important project in crypto.

[Anonymous No.53448834]

>>53448824
and what do you mean by self custody?

Sorry I'm mentally handicapped

[Anonymous No.53448861]

>The traditional three factors are something you have, something you are (biometrics), and something you know. The fourth factor is somebody you know.
Looks like Ari took the identitypill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q11BuI33qXo

[Anonymous No.53448894]

>>53448834
Self custody as in storing your crypto on a hardwallet as opposed to coinbase or CeFi. As >>53448831 points out it creates a mechanism for wallet key recovery.

[Anonymous No.53448924]

>>53448894
Very nice. Impressive

[Anonymous No.53448943]

>>53448786
another research paper?

[Anonymous No.53448972]

>>53448894
ive been self custody, why is this important?

[Anonymous No.53448987]

>>53448924
basically your keys are encrypted in a DON, and you can auth, using multiple social media or institution accounts to recover your keys, foe example, through deco youd need to put your facebook login, your bank login and your onlyfans account. you can specify n guardians out of k, and the don would then once you authentify to all your guardian api endpoints, it would recover your keys

[Anonymous No.53449004]

Who foots the bill though? Ari points out institutions don’t offer this yet as there’s no financial incentive for them to do so. So how does chainlink monetize this service?

[Anonymous No.53449010]

>>53448972
read the damn paper he explains why self custofy cant have mass adoption

[Anonymous No.53449093]

>>53448972
because average normies losing/breaking their phones 4 times a year while forgetting important login info for financials won't ever be able to manage a cryptographic wallet key pass of 30 characters. this allows a safety net for self custody retards and promotes a more unbanked society.

>>53449004
chainlink provides the mechanism for this to exist. there's absolutely a financial incentive as it grows the amount of services being used on the network.

[Anonymous No.53449130]

How is this a bad thing?

[Anonymous No.53449143]

I'm disappointed by the lack of fud so far. No doubt they'll be in the discord, scratching their heads and coming to the conclusion that the best idea is to go on about the token price for a while until someone finds an angle

[Anonymous No.53449180]

>>53449093
Right but what is the mechanism by which this becomes monetized? Who is incentivized to pay chainlink for this service? As pointed out by Ari, institutions don’t offer it yet as there’s not enough demand. Are they going to expect individuals to market buy link tokens?

[Anonymous No.53449229]

>>53449180
This. It’s just pie in the sky bullshit until it is implemented, mass adopted.

[Anonymous No.53449246]

This is not fud btw, genuinely curious. Is DECO going to be the ‘fries’ to CBDC’s ‘big mac’, and it will just be a product stuck waiting on customers to arrive?

[Anonymous No.53449247]

>>53449180
you don't need to purchase link to use a service that utilizes the chainlink suite in the background. say some website sets up a smartcontract ui to do what this is talking about. you'd login to your bank or social media account and create some kind of token or key. connect the two to create some kind of recovery process for your metamask wallet or w/e and pay a small fee in usd. that fee is converted to link to pay the node operators processing your deco requests.

[Anonymous No.53449310]

>>53449143
>lack of fud
it is offset by the absence of a product (DECO)

[Anonymous No.53449311]

>>53449247
Yes but who is going to actually set up that service if not chainlink themselves? I understand how it works, simply not seeing where the demand comes from. Nobody is going to do it for free, unless chainlink decides to bootstrap and subsidize this like they have with price feeds.

[Anonymous No.53449325]

>>53449311
the real question you should be asking is how will this lead to the token capturing any value
lol

[Anonymous No.53449331]

>>53449180
>As pointed out by Ari, institutions don’t offer it yet as there’s not enough demand.
chainlink has literally just invented this technology (or taken it out of academic research at least) and it's in alpha to certain partners... man there's some fucking retards here... this is also why we know that we haven't bottomed yet

[Anonymous No.53449366]

>>53448819
forth factor authentication means you can use your village to unlock your wallet after squirrels eat your seed words

[Anonymous No.53449387]

>>53449325
Well that’s obvious, I’m not a TNN troll. The issue isn’t the tokenomics, its the lack of real world demand for the network. In 5-10 years when CBDC’s are fully integrated in society sure, but right now? You’re just holding bags until then. In the meantime eth and the shitcoin casino will run laps around chainlink for another 1-2 cycles.

[Anonymous No.53449441]

>>53449143
The FUD is that this is literal nonsense that will do nothing to pump your bag.

[Anonymous No.53449445]

>>53448786
H O L Y B A S E D

This will be a good year

[Anonymous No.53449460]

>>53449311
you lack imagination, anon. you need to know right now how this brand new zero proof tech that can secure what was up till now an unrecoverable passkey that has lost millions upon millions of assets for users over the last decade who mismanaged their paper or hardware wallet. i'm not a marketing guy so i can't wrap this tech up with a nice bow and make it appealing to normies, but i would pay a fee to have a hands free wallet recovery process. there's an entire open banking movement happening in europe which has successfully pushed banks to open their data to third party fintechs to expand financial freedom. there is a growing demand out there whether you realize it or not.

[Anonymous No.53449520]

>>53449460
>how will this materialize anon??
>you lack imagination
>trust me anon, there's growing demand you're just too stupid to realize this
incredible post, entirely devoid of any substance

[Anonymous No.53449558]

>>53449460
I’ve got imagination and I can see why valuations like 81k might be possible one day. I just don’t see how usecases like this actually spur adoption rather than waiting on the catalysts that do. They’re neat don’t get me wrong, but its like inventing apps before the app store exists. If swift/CCIP don’t happen this cycle, I don’t see how chainlink doesn’t spend the next half decade treading water.

[Anonymous No.53449570]

>>53448972
Not important, it’s just for retards that lose their keys

[Anonymous No.53449685]

>>53449520
>where is the demand?
i illustrated the demand with a reference to the psd2 movement and my own experience of wanting this service. nexo is insolvent and you're literally fudding for free.

>>53449558
well custody has always been a very problematic barrier for dlt. trusting cexes has proven to be horrifying over the past few years and the safer route of self custody can get you into a bit of trouble as well. lose the paper wallet, lose your entire portfolio. with this, at least some kind of progress can be made in the direction of an actual decentralized society. defi actually true to its name rather than the garbage pseudo defi products we've had in the last few years. for this to be efficient, it does need ccip though so i understand your concern.

[Anonymous No.53450834]

>>53449310
You're right. The best way to invest is always to wait until the product is released, and the token price has gone through the ceiling; then, and ONLY then, buy in. That's what the smart guys do, right? We make it seem so easy, you and I.

[Anonymous No.53450854]

Reminder that Sergey said there was lots of demand for Proof of Reserves post FTX, to date not one exchange has implemented it

[Anonymous No.53450866]

>>53450854
lol

[Anonymous No.53450887]

>>53450854
Obviously tit's not the exchanges demanding it, then. I'm sure there are plenty of chagrined customers who would rather they'd had it.

[Anonymous No.53450893]

>>53448786
I remember when this was a breadcrumb last year.

>>53450854
Once exchanges get regulated with the help of SBF, PoR will be a requirement.

[Anonymous No.53451007]

>While Alice is vacationing in Hawaii, a shark swallows her hardware wallet.
I love Ari

[Anonymous No.53451092]

>>53450854
there's demand until they realize that there's no way they'd actually want to implement it

[Anonymous No.53451193]

>>53451007
Wish she'd lost it in a boating accident..

[Anonymous No.53451264]

>>53451193
Ari seems like the kind of guy who likes to bring dates on boats...

[Anonymous No.53451276]

>>53448924
Do you need to buy link tokens for it to work? All I care about is if they are making users buy link tokens not allowing them to pay in eth or some bullshit

[Anonymous No.53451376]

>>53451264
am i supposed to see a green ball going around after i stare at the cross? that's what i see

[Anonymous No.53451407]

Didnt read, not buying shitstink

[Anonymous No.53451591]

>>53451407
Thanks for sharing. You clearly don't care about this token.

[Anonymous No.53452329]

>>53451264
You know... because of the... implication.

[Anonymous No.53452395]

can≠will

[Anonymous No.53452424]

>>53448786
I love Ari's written and spoken style of prose. He's a 140+IQ giga brain but the way he explains things is crystal clear.

[Anonymous No.53453322]

>>53448786
more fucking research papers yippeee. When are they going to create value for token holders who bootstrapped their research company

[Anonymous No.53453355]

>>53451376
The pink ones disappear too

[Anonymous No.53453658]

>>53451591
he's not alone actually. it'll be a long time until anyone who even dips their toes into crypto will ever touch this weird cult shit. the only ones who will end up owning this just go all in on whatever those machines at the store offers, which this is one of. whatever those peeps earn will be spent on cheeseburgers and montegos.

[Anonymous No.53453837]

>>53452424
Agreed. Also his cartoons are so goofy that they're actually based as fuck. Would slip Alice my Bob if you know what I mean.

[Anonymous No.53454056]

>>53453837
Show bobs and alice

[Anonymous No.53454586]

>a user can designate a set of helpers called “guardians,” who enable *her*
Stopped reading right there.

[Anonymous No.53454645]

>>53448786
i hate shitlink. it blows

[Anonymous No.53455584]

>>53454645
I love it and have 60k Link staked plus a couple thous' loose in case it moons and I fancy a big treat. Imagine your face when all the Buidl and rewards drop around September this year. Gosh! >.<

[Anonymous No.53455651]

>>53451007
reddit

[Anonymous No.53455908]

>>53453837
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_and_Bob
Kys you braindead piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.53455916]

>>53448786
>Research

[Anonymous No.53456084]

>>53449331
> it's in alpha to certain partners
name them

[Anonymous No.53456628]

>>53453658
It's quite amazing how many people spend so much time talking about this token they're not interested in. I've never figured it out. I feel like i'm missing out on something by being interested in it.

[Anonymous No.53456642]

>>53456628
you can participate in link threads without owning the token. its called implicit participation

[Anonymous No.53456646]

Nice, too bad it's just another article about research with 0 practical implications. Ari (and now Dahlia Malkhi too) keeps coming up with new ideas that they never fucking implement... it's been 5.5 years since the whitepaper and most of that shit is still not here, not to mention town crier, mixicles, DECO, FSS, CCIP...

[Anonymous No.53456652]

>>53456646
maybe they need someone like chainlinkgod to dumb down these hair brained research schemes so the engineering team can buidl

[Anonymous No.53457096]

>>53456642
Oh, I wasn't suggesting it was impossible or in some way illicit, only that it was notable how many take such an interest, who profess to be disinterested, and in some cases dislike the token. I've not really seen the phenomenon elsewhere. It's quite, quite remarkable. It's akin to going to see a band one dislikes, so that one might criticise them. Of course, there's no reason to outlaw such behaviour as everyone can do as they please. Still, it's remarkable.

[Anonymous No.53457166]

>>53457096
>Oh
>>>/leddit/

[Anonymous No.53457168]

>>53457096
Not really, bagholders are all the same
in fact you have the same exact reaction with gme, icp and xrp schizos
>sooooo interesting that you choose to criticize my bags with facts and logic, who is paying you anon???

[Anonymous No.53457203]

Bottom line is you're probably more interested in Link than I am, and I have 60k of them staked.
>>53457166
Oh right. Top comment.

[Anonymous No.53457212]

>>53457203
woops, half my post got deleted as i posted it. nm

[Anonymous No.53457330]

>>53456642
>you can participate in link threads without owning the token
But why?

[Anonymous No.53457361]

>>53448786
Imagine trusting some chainlink shit institutions and your friends when you could just use on-chain custody instead.

[Anonymous No.53457370]

>>53457330
why do people rage about right clicking jpegs despite not owning any?

[Anonymous No.53457373]

>>53448786
I’m literally shaking right now. I can’t believe this happened to me!!
>finally get my dad to take me to McDonald’s
>mcchicken is amazing obviously
>after the meal we're on our way out and I see him
>sergey is on his way to his limo
>go up and ask for his autograph
>"Is that all you want, kid?"
>my jaw drops and so does his plaid shirt
>I immediately dive between his folds and catch Big Mac sauce in my mouth, swallowing it quickly but not too quickly to savor the flavor
>half an hour passes and my stomach is about to burst
>at this point I'm actually starting to feel the singularity myself
>Sergey puts on his checkered blouse, winks at me, gets in his limo and leaves
>turns out my dad was watching the whole time
>says he wants to eat Sergeys secret sauce next time too

Christ almighty, what a night! And I'm still full!

[Anonymous No.53457377]

>>53457212
im sure it was just as worthless as your others

[Anonymous No.53457702]

>>53457370
... what?

[Anonymous No.53457720]

>>53455908
He means the actual illustrations of Alice and Bob, dumbfuck.

[Anonymous No.53457743]

>>53457702
>... what?
huh?

[Anonymous No.53457796]

>>53457702
he's talking about nfts moron
>https://www.realchangenews.org/news/2022/10/19/nfts-are-scam-change-my-mind
I highly doubt that this guy holds any nfts, I also find hard to believe that he wrote that entire blogpost simply to shake nft holders out
tl:dr stop grasping at straws

[Anonymous No.53457814]

>>53457796
>he's talking about nfts moron
I know, but it has zero relevance to my question, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.53457852]

https://twitter.com/payment_infrast/status/1618947812036861954

Ooooohhhh linkiieeeesss. Just 10 more years

[Anonymous No.53457865]

>>53457852
>10 more years
until full-scale adoption.
Initial adoption will occur way sooner than that.

[Anonymous No.53457912]

>>53448824
Jesus fucking Christ. We're all going to be so fucking rich, aren't we?

[Anonymous No.53457956]

>>53457865
No it'll be decades; multiple. 20 years for real adoption. We're internet circa 1986 waiting for the year 2006

[Anonymous No.53457969]

>An institution Z might create an interface
>Z
oh my fuck ari is in bed with the russians? SELL RIGHT NOW

[Anonymous No.53458020]

>>53451276
End users don't need to buy LINK, DAPP creators don't even need to know they are buying LINK. They can just pay a premium and have their ETH auto converted to LINK for node ops

[Anonymous No.53458025]

>>53457956
Do you hold any LINK?

[Anonymous No.53458063]

>>53457912
Uhuh - if you have a make it stack of 100k you will reasonably have 1m eoy. So just hodl.

[Anonymous No.53458096]

Anons…pls give me some hopium. My life sucks.

[Anonymous No.53458098]

>>53457814
you literally get spoonfed and you still can't make the connection
moron

[Anonymous No.53458107]

>>53458098
>people fud Link because other people get angry when you right click NFTs they don't own

k schizo
Keep switching IDs too.

[Anonymous No.53458108]

>>53448786
"As you may or may not know, it’s an odd scientific fact that your friends probably have more friends than you do"
>Ari shitting straight up linkies' head
GG

[Anonymous No.53458124]

>>53458107
>people fud nfts without owning them
>but people fudding LINK specifically without holding it doesn't make sense hurrr durr
your brain on crypto

[Anonymous No.53458148]

>>53458124
>>people fud nfts
He was talking about people getting mad about right-clicking nfts.

>but people fudding LINK specifically without holding it doesn't make sense hurrr durr
The analogy would have to involve fudding a specific NFT vendor, not all NFTs in general.
Because the people who fud Link don't hate oracles as a whole, in fact they often advocate competing oracles or at least first-party oracles.

[Anonymous No.53458178]

>>53458148
I just explained exactly what he was talking about and you keep engaging in hopeless mental gymnastics to dismiss his (completely) valid point:
people CAN shittalk something without having any stake on it
>nooooo the analogy was heckling wrong durrr
>noooo true link fudders do x and y, they never do z!111

[Anonymous No.53458192]

>>53458178
>people CAN shittalk something without having any stake on it
There's a very big difference between shittalking NFTs as a concept, and shittalking a specific oracle network.

[Anonymous No.53458202]

>>53458192
>no0o0o0o you should have being trash talking the entire oracle market reeeeeeeeeeee

[Anonymous No.53458237]

>>53458202
Go ahead and fud, man. It doesn’t change anything

[Anonymous No.53458242]

>>53458237
the endless shilling doesn't work either but here you are

[Anonymous No.53458270]

>>53458242
>nooooooo you can’t say anything positive about a coin you hold reeeeeee

[Anonymous No.53458274]

>>53458242
Absolutely rent free

[Anonymous No.53458288]

>>53458270
that's the fucking point, that works BOTH ways you imbecile
>>53458274
typical bagholder cope when he realizes he has no arguments

[Anonymous No.53458311]

>>53458288
>p-pls argue with me in this Chainlink thread

[Anonymous No.53458317]

>>53458311
>p-pls stop bullying me :(

[Anonymous No.53458329]

Enough of these shit self custody blabbing. Just want to have an experience, which self custody project can you recommend for a fag

[Anonymous No.53458333]

>>53458317
>bullying
If anything you're flattering me and my investment with your presence and persistence.

[Anonymous No.53458347]

>>53458333
>le FUD is soooo bullish bros!
t. every bagholder ever

[Anonymous No.53458352]

>>53458347
Not bullish, flattering.

[Anonymous No.53458362]

>>53458352
I'm happy to see my "persistence" is reinforcing your delusions anon

[Anonymous No.53458370]

>>53458362
>reinforcing your delusions
Not reinforcing my delusions, flattering.

[Anonymous No.53458385]

>>53458370
>h-h-haha the joke's on you your bullying is actually "flattering"
>now pls stop

[Anonymous No.53458389]

>>53458025
No jeet, I'd prefer ALBT or ORE to have the best self-custody web3 and manage identity on the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.53458404]

>>53458385
>>now pls stop
I don't want you to stop, clearly I want you to stay here and keep posting or I wouldn't reply to you.

[Anonymous No.53458412]

>>53458288
I don’t have a problem with you fudding link. there are thousands of people staking or just holding link that don’t have a problem with you fudding link. There have been dozens of low-effort fud threads up at a time over the past year and a half. If a thread like this pops up? Someone like you gets immediately butthurt, argues for a bit and then resorts to shitty memes, conjecture or ad hominem. You could do the same for a bsv thread, or hex or xrp or any other shitcoin. yet here you are, in every single Link thread kek

[Anonymous No.53458420]

>>53455908
>He thinks I'm not aware that Alice and Bob are common concepts used in research
>He doesn't get I'm merely talking about their goofy illustrations/representations of them Ari uses in his slides and articles

[Anonymous No.53458436]

>>53458412
>gets immediately butthurt, argues for a bit and then resorts to shitty memes, conjecture or ad hominem
kek, you just described the average bagholder, the irony
>You could do the same for a bsv thread, or hex or xrp or any other shitcoin
>implying these threads aren't filled with the same fud
>implying those baggies don't use the exact same copy pasted argument linkies use "THE FUD IS BULLISH IF MY SHITCOIN WAS USELESS THEY WOULDN'T FUD IT WGMI"
baggies are always so indulged in their echo chamber and information babble they can't see the forest for the trees

[Anonymous No.53458440]

>>53458242
He’s right though, legitimate constructive criticism in this analogy of the nft article would be critiquing the idea of oracles as a whole, not spamming chud memes and cock cages. Most of what I wrote earlier in this thread could be misconstrued as fud but I’m just trying to understand how it can be monetized which is a fair question for someone invested or potentially invested in the token. Obviously you could have some interesting critiques yourself but to imply 90%+ of the fud on here isn’t pointless spam is obviously disingenuous. Its also not difficult to pose questions in a way to get actual discussion going, obviously a couple low iq’s are going to shout bulgarian or fud at you but that’s par for the course on this shithole.

[Anonymous No.53458460]

>>53458436
>baggies are always so indulged in their echo chamber
You too, so it seems.

[Anonymous No.53458478]

>>53456642
>implicit participation
checked and keked

[Anonymous No.53458482]

>>53458440
>the link FUD is exclusively about cock cages and chud memes
>linkpool rugging and the horserimmer remains as an official employee of Chainlink
>prominent community advocates shilling blatant scams
>Chainlink themselves associating with literally every known scam in the industry, including but not limited to fucking NEXO of all things
>adelyn and sales team getting sacked
>build tokens getting shitcanned (eerr I mean postponed indefinitely)
>abysmal price action
>introducing feature creep instead of shipping any product
>announcing an initial lockup of 12-24 only to backtrack after extreme backlash from the community
>DA/Blythe breadcrumbs lead to nowhere after Maersk announcing abandoning blockchain logistics
yup, no legitimate criticism to be seen here, it's all cock cages

[Anonymous No.53458528]

>>53458482
The thread is about deco. Also linkpool was always a scam but the fact you led with that one says a lot. lpl fags getting annihilated was a fun twist I have to admit.

[Anonymous No.53458534]

>>53458482
I can just taste the seethe

[Anonymous No.53458537]

>>53458436
>kek, you just described the average bagholder, the irony
No, I just described you. You are the one resorting to name calling and muh pic rel.
>baggies are always so indulged in their echo chamber and information babble they can't see the forest for the trees
What am I missing here? That the fud posted here isn’t low quality? Hell pretty much everything posted is low quality.

[Anonymous No.53458562]

>>53458528
>The thread is about deco
a non existent product we've been waiting since 2019, yes, what did you expect when they based the technology on dead end shit like SGX though lol
>hurrr linkpool was always a scam, the team just enjoys associating and promoting scams lmao
very weak bro
>>53458537
>n-n-no you1!11
see the post above yours and you'll realize the only people engaging in ad homs and deflections are baggies

[Anonymous No.53458570]

>>53458562
>a non existent product
At least it lives in your mind.

[Anonymous No.53458578]

>>53458570
case in point, that zrYKPpMPT faggot has been tearfully throwing ad homs ever since I btfo him
kek

[Anonymous No.53458591]

>>53458578
>since I btfo him
No I btfo you

[Anonymous No.53458594]

>>53458562
You’re just thrashing like a child though, you spamming every possible critique in a deco thread is as pointless as baggies randomly saying wagmi, 1keoy, look at swift and ccip etc. You’re just the mirror image of what you claim to hate. And laughing at linkpoolers isn’t weak, its schadenfraude you smug faggots.
pools closed kek

[Anonymous No.53458605]

>>53458591
>17 seething pbtid
I'm "flattered"
>>53458594
>n-n-nooooo criticizing LINK on a LINK thread is pointless reeeeeeee
kek the absolute state

[Anonymous No.53458613]

>>53458605
>>17 seething pbtid
I'm not seething, I'm literally in a thread about my investment.

[Anonymous No.53458621]

>>53458613
thanks very flattering

[Anonymous No.53458627]

>>53458605
You have 5+ fud generals going at anytime for random criticisms. This is the thread to fud deco.

[Anonymous No.53458636]

>>53458621
Me being in a thread about my investment is flattering?

[Anonymous No.53458662]

>>53458627
>>53458613
You are being baited, you are playing into his hands by continually engaging with him. It's this shit that means every thread about LINK gets immediately derailed

[Anonymous No.53458678]

>>53458662
>You are being baited, you are playing into his hands by continually engaging with him.
I'm genuinely enjoying his obsession.

[Anonymous No.53458684]

>>53458627
kek, it seems that this shill is buttmad I rekt his "concerned marine" shilling angle
>pls STAHP this thread is about DECO pls
>but anon, DECO is currently vaporware
>noooooooooo go away reeeeeee
>>53458636
>another (You) from the seething faggot
thanks, very flattering
>>53458662
you literally had 100+ posts itt before I entered it and you've discussed literally nothing of substance
>muh link discussion is getting derailed

[Anonymous No.53458711]

>>53458662
Probably but I’m not going to lie, its genuinely enjoyable seeing lpl fags seethe so hard. Remember how smug they were in their threads the last couple of years, you’re seeing the inverse of that sort of energy in every link thread now. Imagine spending tens of thousands of dollars on a scam instead of just buying more link kek.

[Anonymous No.53458729]

>>53458711
>reee fudders are projecting
>proceeds to project that I'm a lpl fag who lost everything
>huuur *REAL* marines aren't bothered by linkpool rugging kek rolf lmao
>heh, all fudders are fags who got rekt on cefi and lpl lel kek lmao
kek, the absolute state of moronic shills

[Anonymous No.53458762]

>>53458711
>Remember how smug they were in their threads the last couple of years
congrats btw, you're one step closer on realizing why half the board gets a raging boner for shittalking linkfags
and the best part is you've said it yourself, it is incredibly satisfying to shit on such a bunch of arrogant, smug cunts full of hubris

[Anonymous No.53458780]

>>53458762
>smug cunts full of hubris
And yet you literally can't stop thinking and talking about us.

[Anonymous No.53458798]

>>53458780
well, the more delusional and arrogant, the better
>LINK, XRP, GME, XMR, HBAR, ROSE
are personally my favorite choices

[Anonymous No.53458801]

>>53456646
This, I think we've read 340 "whitepapers" and academic jargon from these people, but it's never implemented. They abandoned trusted hardware, mixicles, town crier, where is fair sequencing? Keep doing this for 20 years and you become a defacto crypto "university"

[Anonymous No.53458818]

>>53458798
Have you thought about getting a hobby or a job or something?
I can't imagine living my life like that, obsessing over other people. Just fucking shoot me at that point lol

[Anonymous No.53458835]

>>53458762
Two replies? I really got you going.
And I’d agree with you if 80-90% of link discussion the past two years wasn’t low effort fud, medium effort concern trolling and pointless semantic arguments. Did you ever read an lpl thread? Basically fud free, which should have been a bright red flag for you to stay away, I’m still laughing at anons that genuinely believed they would have to buy a third party token to stake. This is like trying to sell vouchers to have the right to buy shovels during the gold rush.

[Anonymous No.53458927]

>>53458835
>the link discussion is shit
>therefore this is bullish
????

[Anonymous No.53458933]

>>53451264
neat.

[Anonymous No.53458938]

What is actually the difference in roles+responsibilities between Chief Scientist (Ari Juels) and Chief Research Officer (Dahlia Malkhi)?

[Anonymous No.53459146]

>>53458927
>22 pbtid begging people to sell their tokens
Im happy for you / sorry that happened. Arent people like you proven coomers and retards from r9k anyway? Hard pass.

[Anonymous No.53459218]

>>53459146
I truly and sincerely hope you all keep buying until the end

[Anonymous No.53459483]

>>53459218
>2+ hours and 23 pbtid later
>w...well so what just buy more then see if i care
Powerful. Just stick to trying not to touch your dick or you might kill yourself or something lmao.

[Anonymous No.53459492]

>>53459483
incredible comeback anon, you sure showed me now

[Anonymous No.53459581]

(You)

[Anonymous No.53459604]

(Me)

[Anonymous No.53459636]

>>53459604
If you want to make a mission out of winning le epic internet arguments and spreading your message, take on the cripplets.
They think if Ripple gets labelled a security, all of crypto will; which is a straight-up lie because they're only a security because Garlicmouth and Schwartz kept telling people they'd pump the token.

That would actually be somewhat constructive.

[Anonymous No.53459671]

>>53459636
I'm legitimately behind every fud on /xsg/ from thread #1000 to at least #1700
want me to start posting my pastas?

[Anonymous No.53459695]

>>53459671
There's barely ever any fud in ripple threads.

I've been in there explaining the Howey test to them many times in the past months and there's literally 0 backup, ever.

[Anonymous No.53459724]

>>53459695
>there's barely any fud in ripple threads
spotted the tourist

Let's pump it, goys, goys, goys!
2k sats EOY, if we're naughty!

Do you goys think Mellon and Babaduck will burn in hell for lying to us and constanly moving goalposts?

> 2018: XRP $589+
> moon iminent, this is the year, Van Jester said so
> real price december EOY: 0.36 USD
> ETH december EOY: 131 USD

> 2020: XRP $2k EOY
> moon this year for sure, mellon and babacuck said so
> real price december EOY: 0.21 USD
> ETH december EOY: 746 USD

> 2021: XRP $2k - $33k EOY
> this year for sure sure
> real price December: 0.80 USD
> ETH price December: 4000 USD

> 2022: XRP 55k
> Babacuck says so, he's never wrong
> I can finally sn33d

> 2 more weeks
> trust the plan
> you have no idea what is coming
> here's how trump can still win
> Trump will peg XRP to gold and win the election by a landslide
> Go away, newfag! You've had 57 years!
> Earth is flat
> Science is bad!

Why is Trump still not president and why didn't he save de economy using XRP yet, just like Mellon said?

Next next meme date: EOY 2022
Next next next meme date: EOY 2023
Next next next next meme date: EOY 2024
Next next next next next meme date: EOY 2025

Next next next next next next next meme date: EOY 2035
>EOY 2035: 1 XRP = 5 USD
>EOY 2035: 1BTC = 10 mil USD
>EOY 2035: 1QNT = 5 mil USD
>EOY 2035: 1HBAR = 1000 USD
>EOY 2035: Schizochads: See we were right, Baba always wins! Eat this, BTC maxis! Seethe, cope, dilate!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRbnQqIdXTs

[Anonymous No.53459740]

>>53459724
>"you promised pump but there no pump"
great fud, anon. You should be proud.

[Anonymous No.53459764]

>>53459740
kek wtf anon, are you also an xrp schizo larping as a linkmarine?

You will never be a real investor. You have no idea about any of the topics you rant about in relation to finance. You are a mystery meat man twisted by 2020 crypto twitter into a crude mockery of actual /biz/ autism.

All the "validation" you get is only in clearly labelled general threads by schizo-larping bagholders just as desperate as you. Outside of these, /biz/ mocks you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, and your "friends" laugh at the switch flippening claims you made back in 2020 December while they've already made it just holding btc and eth.

Non-subhumans are utterly repulsed by xrpaypigs. Thousands of dead shitcoins have allowed /biz/ to sniff out bad bets with incredible efficiency. Even the few xrp shills actually here since 2018 holding $3+ bags look like newfags and retards. Your returns are a dead giveaway. And even if you do manage to pump, the momentum will die off if it ever does get to half of its previous ATH.

You will never fit in here. You pump out another general and fill it with dream diary posts and twitter screencaps and tell yourself it's going to be okay, but you look over the old EOS "landmark case" you only just heard about and feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.

Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll steal a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you in a cardboard coffin with a headstone marked with your negative net worth, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a poorfag is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a red balance in a small savings account that they harass your parents to pay for because you have nothing in your estate.

[Anonymous No.53459799]

>j/s7fGou
>calls anon a schizo
>proceeds to ramble like a schizo

[Anonymous No.53459823]

>>53459764
Lol this is actually my pasta that I converted from the tranny one when xrpaypigs were spamming the board after they came from twitter. You can try to pretend otherwise but you know 100 percent that that one isn't yours.

[Anonymous No.53459828]

>>53459799
>supposed "linkmarines" getting triggered over xrp fud
I've always suspected there was an overlap between the two communities desu

[Anonymous No.53459836]

>>53459823
by all means I'm not trying to take credit for them, by "my pastas" I meant the shit I have saved on a notepad

[Anonymous No.53459841]

>>53459828
Ripple is a massive scam, and the fact that its execs kept saying they'd pump the price should've clued everyone in years ago.

But you're shitting out pure schizobabble.

[Anonymous No.53459846]

>>53459841
>noooooo you're not fudding properly
kek the absolute state of deranged linkfags

[Anonymous No.53459854]

>>53459836
Oh my bad. Im happy to see it still floating around anyway kek.

[Anonymous No.53459858]

>>53459846
Crying "b-b-but you promised it would pump QQ" isn't fud.

Pointing out that telling people "we'll pump the price" makes your shit a security is.

[Anonymous No.53459896]

>>53459858
if you weren't an absolute tourist newfag, you would've known that /xsg/ has been entirely based on larps and riddles
you absolute moron

>Insiders/UHNWI/Mellon/Lore:
https://pastebin.com/Z39w20qf

>Memesmiths:
https://pastebin.com/2hdYtXVY

>reeeee leave my shitcoin alone go fud on the cripplets
>noooooo you're doing it wrong reeeeee

[Anonymous No.53459909]

>>53459896
>you would've known that /xsg/ has been entirely based on larps and riddles
Attacking larps and riddles =/= attacking ripple

[Anonymous No.53459941]

>>53459909
there's no need to "attack ripple", the sec has that covered, so the only hope they cling on to are the silly larps
plus, you only need to look at the fucking chart
>6 years of crabbing and never ending downtrend against BTC
keep outing yourself as a clueless newfag though

[Anonymous No.53459958]

>>53459941
>there's no need to "attack ripple", the sec has that covered
Cripplets are setting up the narrative that losing the lawsuit means all of crypto is in danger, which is simply not true.

Debunking this would actually help mitigate a market-wide panic once ripple does lose.

[Anonymous No.53459972]

>>53459958
the narrative is that the lawsuit is a theater and ripple unironically CAN'T LOSE
why do you pretend you've ever entered these threads, it is painfully obvious you have no idea what you're talking about

[Anonymous No.53460015]

>>53459972
>the narrative is that the lawsuit is a theater and ripple unironically CAN'T LOSE
... and that if they lose, all of crypto loses.

Which is horseshit because the only reason they're a security is because Garlinghouse said he'd pump the token.

[Anonymous No.53460069]

>>53460015
>nooo attack this xyz head canon I've created
ok bro whatever, anything else to steer the attention away from the absolute clusterfuck that Chainlink is?

[Anonymous No.53460155]

>>53460069
I bet you're literally like 105 iq or something.

[Anonymous No.53460207]

>>53460155
>more ad homs
yup, that's more like you!

[Anonymous No.53460215]

>>53460015
>and that if they lose, all of crypto loses
lol wut, according to xrp baggies, every crypto with the exception of XLM and ALGO (and whatever shitcoin the unbearable bull chooses to shill) is a scam and it's going to zero
they even have a substitute for link oracles called flare and according to the lore, ETH is the actual security and everything will go to zero and xrp will magically rise to $2k, regardless of the lawsuit outcome
all in all, there's not a single xrp schizo scenario involving other cryptos having success

[Anonymous No.53460267]

>>53460215
They're saying if Ripple is found a security, all cryptos are.

[Anonymous No.53460292]

>>53460215
it's pointless bro, now he's going to ignore everything you said only to repeat his made up narrative over and over again

[Anonymous No.53460308]

>>53460207
fudding Link does nothing, fudding ripple helps mitigate crypto-wide repercussions.
Because odds are ripple will fail, and the more people realize WHY they are a security, the better for all of crypto.

I'm giving you at least a constructive way to spend your time fudding (since that's what you want to do) but you're too dumb to even understand what I'm saying.
And saying "haha the price isn't as high as you anonymous posters claimed on 4chan" isn't fud.

[Anonymous No.53460354]

>>53460308
>fudding Link does nothing
then get off my dick bro, accept the fact that your investment is not universally praised and move on, or just dispel the "fud"
oh wait, you can't cause none of it is fud lol
>the price isn't as high as you anonymous posters claimed on 4chan
these anonymous posters literally created a cult back in 2020 and that said cult only believes on the larps and ignores reality completely, pretty much like you
keep seething linkfag

[Anonymous No.53460498]

>>53460354
But your points have been addressed before and your only strategy is to just keep repeating them like a jew while hoping that people either cant be bothered repeating themselves or that no one knowledgable is paying attention. Apparently youve spent 4 hours straight seething in this thread alone - you dont even seem to know how retarded and obsessed you look because of that. When i can be bothered to comment on xrp / bsv or whatever its usually a one-and-done thing becsuse I genuinely dont care that much but you definitely seem to.

Have you ever tried to explain how you spend your time here to someone you know irl?

[Anonymous No.53460526]

>>53458063
No one left on biz now still holds that much

[Anonymous No.53460532]

>>53460498
>your points have been addressed
>>53458482
>you seem retarded
>obsessed
>idc though
your lack of arguments is amusing lol

[Anonymous No.53460580]

>>53460532
>b-buh please engage with me seriously
But your game has been figured out already and we both know you wouldnt listen to anything youve been told, and that youve been told several times before. So nah.

Why do you always avoid addressing how much time you actually waste on this kind of thing though? Is making a miserable ass out of yourself a weird hobby of yours or something?

[Anonymous No.53460582]

>>53458436
this anon >>53458412 is right, you must go into xrp threads and spam your shit right? What's the difference? Did you actually look at the xrp chart or price action? You should be all over that, the possibilities for ridicule are really endless there

[Anonymous No.53460596]

>>53460580
>doubles down on ad homs and deflection
just say "I have no arguments, pls stahp" and be done with it
>>53460582
are you having a stroke anon? I do go on /xsg/ threads, read my posts lmao

[Anonymous No.53460624]

>>53460596
And you're at the end of your rope now so all you can do is pretend that youve won an argument that youve lost several times before

So ill ask again - because anything else you have to say is just noise:
>Why do you always avoid addressing how much time you actually waste on this kind of thing though?

Are you that Thomas guy? Serious question. I could understand if this was all some kind of expression of pain because a bored linkie exposed you like that.

[Anonymous No.53460634]

>>53460596
Right I just read the rest of the thread but H.O.L.Y S.H.I.T anon, now I'm impressed. You must literally live on biz. How come you're able to neet? Don't tell me you actually made it?

[Anonymous No.53460690]

>>53460354
>get off my dick
Says the obsessive nutcase who can't get off Link's dick.

[Anonymous No.53460736]

>>53460624
>hahaha no I won't provide a single argument, I'm gonna continue with the projection and ad homs, it makes me feel much better about the absolute train wreck my "golden ticket" turned out to be
>are you x twitterfag? are you a bored linkie??? are you an lpl fag? are you simeon the bulgarian himself?
>anon, pls, I'm begging you stop talking about chainlink and let's talk about you and your ulterior nefarious motives
>>53460634
btc and ethfag in late 2016
>>53460690
kek, the hubris of this post
>random link shillfag = LINK

[Anonymous No.53460806]

>>53460736
And as expected, you just default to your spiel and avoid the question at all costs.
No doubt youll scuttle off like a rat soon and spend 4+ hours angrily repeating old debunked crap about a token you dont hold tomorrow and the day after and the day after for... no particular reason at all!

[Anonymous No.53460838]

>>53460806
>n-n-no arguments spoonfeeding seazon over newfags, plus I've beat you in an imaginary battle I had with someone else on some other thread eons ago!1
>y-y-you avoid these hard hitting questionz such as "are you Thomas"?????
>e-e-every fudder on biz is the same person s-s-see ya tomorrow
and you avoid providing any kind of refutation bro, it's truly hilarious, are you bipolar by any chance?
ps the only Thomas I acknowledge

[Anonymous No.53461086]

>>53460736
damn do you still hold BTC and Eth? How much did you make?.

[Anonymous No.53461197]

>>53461086
How new are you? Everyone who fuds “made it 10 years ago”, “sold the top and just comes back to laugh at baggies” etc.

[Anonymous No.53461746]

>>53461086
I'm entirely out of the market since February 2021, you should have seen the amount of shit I got from this board for selling "at the start of the rally before $100k"
I've made 7 figures from a 4 figure investment, the majority of my gains came from shit like railblocks and the chink eth (neo)
>>53461197
>nobody made it, everyone is a larper, only linkies have a real chance!!111

[Anonymous No.53461957]

>>53461746
What did you do? Was it hard dealing with 7 figures? I'd probably keep it all in stables for a while on a hardware wallet, I don't trust banks anymore

[Anonymous No.53462053]

>>53461957
>I'd probably keep it all in stables for a while on a hw wallet
I couldn't immediately do that because of exchange withdrawals limits, plus I didn't even trust the stable coins to begin with
I've "laundered" a part through localbitcoins, I withdrew some on my bank (we didn't have any crypto limits at the time), I've made some special arrangements with some local BTC atms, and the rest of them I was lucky enough to resell to people I knew irl for cash, so I simply transferred the crypto from my exchange accounts to theirs
most of my networth is cash as of now

[Anonymous No.53462189]

>>53462053
As in physical cash and not in the bank?

[Anonymous No.53462198]

>>53462189
yes CIA, come at me

[Anonymous No.53462244]

on a side note, btc and eth suck ass for this kind of things, both are slow and expensive af
I unironically used LTC for the majority of my txs, and I have to say, shitcoin or not, it fucking does the job
I don't recommend anyone holding it long term though, this pos literally pumps only for its halvings

[Anonymous No.53462252]

>>53462198
You're telling me you've got 7 figures in cash? Sitting in your apartment? Do you keep it in a safe?

[Anonymous No.53462286]

>>53462244
That's interesting about litecoin, I trust you anon, I bought BTC on localbitcoins and buy xmr from there now. Btc and Eth are Def not great to use, what do you think about nfts?

[Anonymous No.53462291]

>>53462252
>You're telling me you've got 7 figures in cash
you got me, I got some meme rocks as well
>Sitting in your apartment?
nope, but nice try mossad
>Do you keep it in a safe?
hahahaha you're not good at this agent smith

[Anonymous No.53462300]

>>53462286
>what do you think about nfts?
like everything in crypto, the potential usecase sounds really promising but as of now it's a joke

[Anonymous No.53463094]

>>53462286
I have a DCA plan for XMR. Now I'm looking at more privacy protocols. The tech here is a better solution and real use of blockchain.

[Anonymous No.53463325]

>>53449310
Kek, alright you got me with this one.

[Anonymous No.53463852]

>>53463325
>Kek, alright you got me with this one
He wasn't talking to you, anon. He was addressing someone else

[Anonymous No.53465046]

>>53449246
kek

[Anonymous No.53466268]

>>53448786
To be honest I'm not really excited about this blog post. In order to have adequate security you'd need to do this with quite a few separate institutions, and the only way to manage that many separate passwords would be with a password manager. That means that your crypto keys are basically still locked behind a single password stored on your computer. I refuse to enter any of my keying details into any computer, so this isn't secure enough for me.

I haven't read the thread yet though, so maybe one of you chuds has a good counterargument.