2023 is confirmed to be LINK's make it year

[Anonymous No.53126473]

"Looking forward to new versions of the data, automation and cross-chain portions of the protocol coming out this year.

Cryptographic Truth is how the world's value will be transacted and secured."

Sergey isn't fucking around. Chainlink is going to change the world. Buy LINK or stay poor.

[Anonymous No.53126492]

>>53126473
“Cross chain portions” fat fuck is trying to do CCIP v0.00001 too. God I hate this man. Im not a shill anymore Ive turned to the dark side and am now a fudder

[2023 is Top Networks make it year No.53126499]

>>53126473
>Looking forward to new versions of the data, automation and cross-chain portions of the protocol coming out this year.

>Cryptographic Truth is how the world's value will be transacted and secured."

>Steve wei isn't fucking around. Top network is going to change the world. Buy TOP or stay poor.

[Anonymous No.53126501]

I will be a trillionaire, nay I am ALREADY a trillionaire.

[Anonymous No.53126523]

https://twitter.com/sergeynazarov/status/1610382922791456769?s=61&t=dKtXigOMdyyntf8BAnvqQA

And yes fudders, it's real.

[Anonymous No.53126635]

>>53126492
>CCIP v0.1 will allow you to send messages to other platforms
>in 12-24 months CCIP v1.0 will allow you to read the messages that were sent previously

1k EOY

[Anonymous No.53126748]

>>53126492
He never fucking delivers. I have never met or come across someone I wanted to punch more than this man. He has given everyone blue balls for 60 months now, always kicking the can down the road. Even the furries at ETH weren't this bad

[Anonymous No.53126771]

Good thing he learned his lesson from last year and posted a tweet with no promises instead of a video full of ones this time.

[Anonymous No.53126800]

>>53126748
>Even the furries at ETH weren't this bad
>pos takes 7 years implement
>still can't withdraw after 3 years
>mucking around before finally landing on rollups that will then take years to decentralize fucks gas prices for years

[Anonymous No.53126925]

>>53126473
>cross chain portions
Jesus fucking christ
I am so retarded for ever believing in this shit.

>>53126492
fpbp

[Anonymous No.53127003]

CLOSE YOUR EYES AND VISUALISE. BREATHE IN. BREATHE OUT. AĤHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.53127016]

can't wait to see these new versions on december 31 at 23:59:59!

[Anonymous No.53127388]

>>53126499
>automation
is he saying steaking isn't automated? is someone at chainlink labs sending the 4.75% apy to the steak wallet everyday manually?
it took him 5 years to do it as well?

[Anonymous No.53127509]

>>53126473
Yesterday's larp talked about an official CCIP announcement for today and that the actual switch would be turned on this weekend. Instead, as per usual, we have this vague gay ass tweet. You Chainlink Labs jannies have no shame whatsoever, don't be surprised when the amount of hate speech and nazi memes under your daddy's tweets grow exponentially. That will discredit the company image and ultimately be its downfall. You better get your shit together asap, screencap this

[Anonymous No.53127556]

>>53127509
Pffffft

[Anonymous No.53127832]

>>53126492
Same man. I have 7k LINK staked and 3k left over. I've been in the sunk cost fallacy for years now. I hate this coin and wish I swapped it for ETH years ago.

[Anonymous No.53127841]

said it before we are going above $100 this year

[Anonymous No.53128062]

>>53127509
>actually being new enough to believe that larp

[Anonymous No.53128336]

>>53128062
My point still stands, /biz/ is a virus and will spread uncontrollably. The link hexagon will be marked as the new hate symbol next to pepe, wait and see

[Anonymous No.53128341]

>>53127509
they does the same thing over and over. At least it isnt as bad as lpl where they hyped and rugged

[Anonymous No.53128380]

>>53126473
>2022 flashbacks

[Anonymous No.53128386]

>>53126473
>a graph of rng function calls
>cumulative total slowing down
what the fuck
the only metrics that matter (real world use and enterprise adoption) aren't on this pic
because they fucking stay at zero

[Anonymous No.53128394]

>>53128386
>>cumulative total slowing down
Were you in a coma for all of 2022?

[Anonymous No.53128419]

>>53126492
>>53126925
It's another "/biz/ tries to read too much into something even though they can barely read at all" episode.

He's talking about the "data portion, automation portion, and cross-chain portion".

[Anonymous No.53128450]

>>53128394
>>53128419
ok bro we get it you're delighted with the pace of developments
turns out a bunch of other people aren't
fuck off with your constant cheerleading for Sergey in every thread

[Anonymous No.53128466]

>>53128419
nah he's talking about v0.1 ccip

[Anonymous No.53128529]

>>53128450
So whine about the pace of developments.
Don't try to read into every single little thing, focus your efforts.

[Anonymous No.53128554]

The cross chain portion of the protocol is CCIP. He's saying CCIP is definitely coming out this year. What is wrong with your reading comprehension?

[Anonymous No.53128559]

>>53128529
>don't try to analyze what the CEO meant by posting this tweet publicly
fuck you apologist
>>53128554
that literally means it's coming out in portions then
great, another v.001

[Anonymous No.53128561]

>>53128419
Im not sure these people fudding are genuine "honest actors" anon...

[Anonymous No.53128576]

>>53128561
>muh honest actors and muh paid bulgarians
I'm never coming back to this shithole, I can't stand your constant schizophrenia and derailing of threads trying to actually discuss this fucking project
>inb4 noooooo you have to be positive, noooo
fuck you shills

[Anonymous No.53128597]

>>53128559
No idiot. It means that CCIP is ONE PORTION of the Chainlink Protocol. Its not even complicated you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.53128611]

>>53128597
exactly what he is saying, 1 portion of ccip is coming. So v0.001

[Anonymous No.53128612]

>>53128597
great, so the entire protocol will still ship in multiple betas
even fucking better
fuck you fucking retard shill

[Anonymous No.53128668]

>>53128612
>wah wah I'm a big gay crybaby bitch
lol

[Anonymous No.53128685]

>>53128668
>shill can't refute shit
>proceeds to avoid and derail
good job on proving him right anon

[Anonymous No.53128701]

>>53128685
>WAAAAAAH I'm a big gay faggot with a chapped bumhole and crusty eyes from crying all night and I pooed my pants and I need mummy to clean it up waaaaah
lmao

[Anonymous No.53128707]

>>53128559
There's nothing to analyze.
Sergey is looking forward to the "data portion, automation portion, and cross-chain portion" of the protocol.

You're trying too hard to read into something like a woman.

[Anonymous No.53128726]

Is it just women here now, fudding Link?
DR;CS

[Anonymous No.53128733]

>>53128668
look at that seething third world monkey screeching over me lol
>>53128707
>There's nothing to analyze.
>offers his own biased analysis
bro, unironically fuck off
I get it, you are completely satisfied
why the fuck do you seem hellbent on preventing others from analyzing a public tweet in any way they desire?
what kind of gaslighting kikery is this?
fuck you

[Anonymous No.53128739]

looks like the discord trannies came up with a new meme
>whoever criticizes link is a woman
so transparent ffs

[Anonymous No.53128740]

>>53128733
>his own biased analysis
That's how the phrasing breaks down purely grammatically you complete sperg.

[Anonymous No.53128743]

>>53128733
>Waaaah mummy mummy please wipe my bum bum i pooed and i need it wiping mummy waaah please
bahahahaha

[Anonymous No.53128747]

>>53128740
that's how YOU interpret it you fucking mongoloid
keep screeching over anons being critical about Sergey

[Anonymous No.53128749]

>>53128747
>7 WAAAAAHS by this ID.

[Anonymous No.53128760]

>>53128749
>4 screeching incoherent ramblings by this jeet shill

[Anonymous No.53128761]

>>53128747
The sentence makes no sense otherwise, you esl shithanded Mohinder.

He's not "looking forward to the data of the protocol coming out this year", he's looking forward to the data PORTION of the protocol coming out this year.

[Anonymous No.53128764]

>>53128707
I too am looking forward to the cross-chain portion of the chainlink protocol, otherwise known as CCIP or the Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol launching this year.

[Anonymous No.53128771]

>>53128739
OMG this community is filled with gross incels yuck!

[Anonymous No.53128772]

>>53128760
>b-buh buh you're a j-jeet stop insulting my friend! you're not allowed to insinuate he's a baby! how dare you!?
HAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.53128773]

>>53128761
>to the data PORTION
the absolute state of shills mental gymnastics
>automation and cross-chain portions of the protocol coming out this year.
>portions of the protocol coming out this year.
>portions of the protocol
unironically go die in a fire

[Anonymous No.53128783]

>>53128773
>WAAAAAAH MUMMY MUMMY CHANGE MY DIAPY OR I'LL GET ANGWY WAAAAAAAAH

[Anonymous No.53128791]

kek the irony is that the obly people arguing like women are shills having mental breakdowns and autistic insulting rants while le "fudders" offer actual arguments which get completely ignored
kek

[Anonymous No.53128792]

a portion of ccip of chainlink protocol coming 2 third this year

[Anonymous No.53128797]

>>53128739
Its a step up from when they said I won’t ever be a woman at least! Right?

[Anonymous No.53128802]

>>53128797
kek

[Anonymous No.53128808]

>>53128773
>>portions of the protocol
Yes.

[Anonymous No.53128811]

>>53128791
>I am le supreme gentleman fudder! My name is Ser Fudham Tophatt! Nice to meet you!

[Anonymous No.53128836]

>>53128576
>i’m never coming back
>posts 6 more times
Leave you whiny little pansy

[Anonymous No.53128837]

>>53128792
No. CCIP is coming this year. It forms portion of the protocol.

[Anonymous No.53128844]

>>53128773
How would “the new version of the data of the protocol” even make sense?

[Anonymous No.53128872]

>>53126473
This reads to me like CCIP is a way away.

I had been hoping the 2022 target would mean we'd still see a jan release.

[Anonymous No.53128880]

CCIP is going to move tokenized assets between bank chains. Maybe even CBDC's. And it's not gonna take so long anymore.

[Anonymous No.53128912]

>CCIP is going to move tokenized assets between bank chains. Maybe even CBDC's. And it's not gonna take so long anymore.

[Anonymous No.53128921]

>>53128808
>yes
>that makes sense
t. Sergey

[Anonymous No.53128929]

>>53128921
That's the only way it does make sense.

See >>53128844

[Anonymous No.53128953]

I am hoping we at least get the C portion of CCIP this year. Im not sure what we can do with just Cross but we will figure out a way to shill it.

[Anonymous No.53128970]

>>53128929
>he didn't get the Sergey Schmidt reference
>"yes that makes sense look at this random shillpost from anonymoose"
cringed and kekked at the same time

[Anonymous No.53128996]

>>53128970
Explain how “the new version of the data of the protocol” makes sense.

[Anonymous No.53129010]

>>53128996
sounds like a new beta announced with a bunch of techno babble thrown in the middle
you seem to be reading in this way too much, are you a woman?

[Anonymous No.53129016]

>>53129010
A new beta version of "the data"?

[Anonymous No.53129023]

Lots of the Link fud comes around this time of the day. This tells me that it’s unemployed brits/ euros doing it.
Get a job you lazy bums

[Anonymous No.53129032]

>>53129016
>Yes, that makes sense
like I said, meaningless word salad

[Anonymous No.53129056]

>>53126473
To those who aren't aware how Chainlink / Chainlinkfag.eth marketing/shilling works: they post something which makes you too nervous to sell in case of a pump (see staking release announcement = just in time to lock up your tokens before the biggest crypto dump in history kek) then once they see incel faggots like you buying up 'cheapies' they dump on your ass.
So screenshot this: sell all your link now and buy back double the stack in a month's time (or don't buy back in because this bullshit is literally heading back to $1)

[Anonymous No.53129072]

>like I said, meaningless word salad

[Anonymous No.53129169]

>Chainlink shills are wagies who are so poor they still need to wage to accumulate
Lmao

[Anonymous No.53129188]

>>53129032
It makes perfect sense as "the data portion of the protocol".

[Anonymous No.53129218]

This only makes sense if you realise what he means by the Chainlink protocol is split into different parts, each of which is a "portion" which comprises part of the overall protocol.

Data is one of these portions. CCIP (or cross chain portion) is another.

[Anonymous No.53129248]

It’s going to be this year. I was just watching some Tik Tok video where the guy is has a prompt in front of his black face saying the pentagon is unable to trace 2.1 trillion and just approved another 800 billion… and there’s like 3,000 comments of people saying they want to burn the shit down. It’s happening. They are going to nosedive everything, and chainlink is going to blossom like a flower and make us all rich.

[Anonymous No.53129251]

>>53128970
>Schmidt
What's the Schmidt bit? I don't see it?

[Anonymous No.53129299]

Why do people who don’t own Link and think it’s a scam spend lots of time here arguing about it?
It’s probably time to reconsider how you spend your time given that it’s limited.
It reminds me of people on Twitter who spend all day looking for arguments and fights. They usually have pronouns in their bios and rainbow flags and talk about their imaginary ailments and disabilities.(You)

[Anonymous No.53129314]

>>53129251
board is filled with newfags apparently
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2kOmSh4h84
21:30

[Anonymous No.53129376]

>>53129314
I know all about Eric Schmidt. I just didn't see the 'Sergey Schmidt reference' you spoke of

[Anonymous No.53129406]

>>53129376
>yeah, this makes perfect sense

[Anonymous No.53129428]

>>53129251
During the talk Schmidt shat on sergey for babbling and not making sense. Sergey just went quiet and looked down, it was brutal. Thats when i decided I cannot invest my money with a weedy loser. Schmidt just started talking about his upcoming biography and didn't give a fuck.

[Anonymous No.53129443]

>>53129428
>Thats when i decided I cannot invest my money with a weedy loser
yet here you are

[Anonymous No.53129445]

>>53126473
Link is one of the best web3 project just like ORE, with the massive increase in web3 development and adoption, I'm certain that 2023 will be a make it year for all web3 projects.

[Anonymous No.53129448]

Hope. Is. Lost.

[Anonymous No.53129486]

>>53128597
Dumbass ccip wasn’t part of the original white paper. Why cant they just finish staking

[Anonymous No.53129603]

>>53129428
I’ll never grow tired of the “Schmidt shat on Sergey at smartcon” headcanon.
It’s even more fanciful than the Jason Parser and murder contract storylines ever were.

[Anonymous No.53129985]

Schmidt is the adult in the room, and there is a "master/student" dynamic going on between Sergey and him. How that is "fud" I dont know. Schmidt is right - Sergey has never killed anyone before. Schmidt has. He dominates competition, with a smile, and with a softly spoken billion dollar glint coming off his nicely polished tie pin.

[Anonymous No.53130031]

>>53129985
he also farts in his toilet just like everyone else

[Anonymous No.53130107]

>>53127388
why the hell do you think there is no withdraw function ? the guy studied philosophy. he has no practical skills at all. the only thing he's good at is talking and making empty promises (hence philosophy).

[Anonymous No.53130129]

>>53129445
What role is ore playing in the web3 space?
I have been hearing it over different platforms

[Anonymous No.53130132]

>>53127388
>>53130107
"Automation" is the new name for keepers, dumbasses.

[Anonymous No.53130148]

>>53128837
he didn't announce CCIP coming out. he announced a portion of the protocol (can mean ANYTHING) coming out. judging by past actions we can deduce that (full)CCIP is NOT coming out this year.
all the sergey asslickers can fuck off.

[Anonymous No.53130181]

>>53130148
The portion of the chainlink protocol is the CCIP part.

[Anonymous No.53130238]

>>53130181
that's what you assume. might be the case. i highly doubt it though since he could have named CCIP but didn't. so far they've always overpromised which to me mean that it really means CCIP 0.00000000000000001. I could be wrong but past actions indicate otherwise.

[Anonymous No.53130276]

>>53130129
This project helps to bring web2 technologies into the web3 ecosystem and ensure a smooth integration with decentralized blockchain systems.

[Anonymous No.53130809]

>>53129376
You're a fucking newfag if you don't understand Eric Schmidt in the context of his relationship to Sergey you dipshit.

[Anonymous No.53130992]

>>53130809
You're not even following this conversation, are you? Try a little harder, Mr Fuddy

[Anonymous No.53131149]

>>53128791
The fudders in this thread cant comprehend english. Their whole argument is over the syntax in which the word portions was used.

[Anonymous No.53131365]

>>53126473
lol youve been saying that for 6 years now

[Anonymous No.53132779]

>>53128576
See you tomorrow, most likely this afternoon

[Anonymous No.53133111]

>>53130129
Basically the only projects working on mass adoption for web3 via seamless authorization and verification process, secured identities and Crosschain interoperability.

[Anonymous No.53133311]

>>53130276
Its all about seamless adoption of web3 and lowering the barrier to entry into blockchain tech. Easy.

[Anonymous No.53133341]

Anyone else remember when ccip was imminent in mid-2021?

[Anonymous No.53133370]

>>53128764
If they can get the CCIP running it will also be a big win for projects in that niche. I got a few in bag and willing to see ow far they can go.