AI

[Anonymous No.53044425]

So, what are the financial implications of a post-AI world?

[Anonymous No.53044471]

>>53044425
This exact phenomenon is described in the first 50 or so pages of The Innovator's Dilemma from Christensen.

[Anonymous No.53044619]

>>53044425
Pods, bugs, and happiness.

[Anonymous No.53044681]

>>53044425
Oil companies in Bumfuckistan will always be in need of translator.

[Anonymous No.53044735]

>>53044681
No they won't.

[Anonymous No.53044743]

>So the price for all translation came crashing down, because the bottom feeders used machine translation.
Imagine being so fucking entitled, stuck up and horrible you refer to the customers you need in order to survive as "bottom feeders".
Maybe the problem was you this whole time, Caroline.

[Anonymous No.53044751]

>>53044425
if you are playing a gto business mindset for goods like that you will get to 0 a lot faster. you cant use ai for legal briefs or architecture if they are not workable within our language framework at the moment.

[Anonymous No.53044865]

>>53044425
same as implications of being flooded by illegals and poojeets that will work for nothing while you are forced to clean up the mess for scraps

[Anonymous No.53044902]

>>53044425
The (((education))) industry is about to get rekt.

[Anonymous No.53044933]

>>53044425
should've picked a better job

[Anonymous No.53044998]

>>53044743
I can only imagine the corporates at McDonald's and Coca Cola have similar contempt for their customer base.

[Anonymous No.53044999]

There will never be true AI
they will always have "guardrails"
there will never be another tay

[Anonymous No.53045023]

>>53044425
We're decades, possibly centuries away from the kind of AI dominated world that clickbait would have you believe is immenent. Machines are doing things better than they were 10 years ago, but our current machines are just Chinese rooms which can never replace humans entirely. Maybe better technology will come along in the future, but it's not even on the horizon at this point.

[Anonymous No.53045099]

>>53045023
>but it's not even on the horizon at this point.
The past 5 years have been a massive fucking boom for AI. You're high if you don't think this train is going to slow down.

[Anonymous No.53045149]

>>53044471
qrd pls or should i ask chatgpt

[Anonymous No.53045178]

>>53044471
imagine taking 50 pages to describe what any retard can grasp from a glance at this pic

[Anonymous No.53045216]

>>53045099
>The past 5 years have been a massive fucking boom for AI. You're high if you don't think this train is going to slow down.

AI does not exist.

[Anonymous No.53045244]

>>53044471

[Anonymous No.53045246]

>>53044902
and that process is based, fuck yuropoors and fuck china

[Anonymous No.53045251]

>>53045099
As far as useful applications of AI, it's not capable of anything fundamentally different now than it was 5 years ago. It's getting better at doing things we've already been doing for years. AI research has generated more clickbait than anything else.

[Anonymous No.53045263]

>>53045216
Artificial consciousness does not exist, Artificial intelligence does.

[Anonymous No.53045301]

>>53045244

i was incognito so no picrel

>qrd on first 50 pages of the innovator's dilemma by Christensen

The Innovator's Dilemma is a business book written by Clayton Christensen, published in 1997. It discusses the concept of disruptive innovation and how it affects established companies in various industries.

In the book, Christensen argues that successful companies often struggle to stay innovative because they are focused on meeting the needs of their most demanding and profitable customers. As a result, they may ignore or underinvest in disruptive technologies or business models that initially seem unimportant or unprofitable.

According to Christensen, this leads to a "dilemma" for innovators, who must choose between meeting the needs of their current customers or investing in potentially disruptive technologies that may not have a clear market yet. He suggests that companies should create a separate unit or "skunkworks" to explore and develop disruptive technologies, so they don't cannibalize the existing business.

Overall, The Innovator's Dilemma presents a framework for understanding how disruptive innovations can emerge and how established companies can navigate the challenges they pose. It has been widely influential in the business world and has been applied to a variety of industries and situations.

>thanks fren

You're welcome! I'm happy to help. If you have any other questions about The Innovator's Dilemma or disruptive innovation, feel free to ask.

[Anonymous No.53045338]

>>53045251
>It's getting better at doing things we've already been doing for years
It's been doing almost everything imaginable already. What new things do you want?

[Anonymous No.53045347]

>>53045251
trumpwrong.gif

[Anonymous No.53045375]

>>53045338
>It's been doing almost everything imaginable already
>he clicked the clickbait

[Anonymous No.53045386]

>>53045023
>>53045216
>He gets caught up on the definition of AI and misses whats happening around him
Call it machine learning then. Bottom line is OPs pic will continue to happen to more industries until all of these bloated industries and overpaid entitled retards get wrecked. There are women making six figures writing werewolf smut on amazon. There are people writing college essays for zoomers making six figures. There are people drawing furry porn making six figures. These will just be the first casualties. The economic effects will be massive and hilarious.

[Anonymous No.53045391]

>>53045244
That's a pretty accurate description. What a time to be alive.

[Anonymous No.53045402]

Stop spamming the board with this shit you fucking poor faggots go learn how to profit off of it if you are useless enough you need the magical AI to do everything for you. Ask ChatGPT how to start a biz with these. Jesus christ you are annoying.

[Anonymous No.53045418]

>>53044425
As we build more powerful and parameter efficient models, there's a race to curate and find better prompts. AI is and always will be to some extent limited by its inputs but the future of most jobs is definitely going to be some sort of manual-AI assisted hybrid so better start learning how to use it now.

[Anonymous No.53045477]

The stage is clearly being set for the next boom in the tech world. Chase shitcoins all you want, just keep an eye on AI investment opportunities. A bunch of dumb money is already starting to chase the hype.

[Anonymous No.53045481]

>>53045386
And farmers were put out of work by mechanical farm equipment. AI is nowhere near as intelligent as the dumbest humans. Until it is, we will always find some other use for humans when some low level skill is replaced by machines. My argument is that we are decades away from machines surpassing even 70 IQ negroids in general intelligence.

[Anonymous No.53045542]

>>53045375
It's used in all sorts of analytics.

[Anonymous No.53045567]

>>53045542
Computers are crunching numbers now? Holy shit when did this happen?

[Anonymous No.53045576]

>>53044425
Lol when you are in business you learn fast: If you aren't quite literally paid to do it, nobody reads anything lmao

[Anonymous No.53045670]

>>53045023
Machines don't need a brain to flip average burgers in the job markert lmao

[Anonymous No.53045701]

>>53045402

[Anonymous No.53045812]

>>53045481
Of course. It seems you are ascribing a doomer viewpoint to my post or something. Im simply saying anyone doubting that so called ai will put many out of a job is short sighted. Personally I dont beleive in artificial consciousness. We are living things. Computers never will be.

[Anonymous No.53045841]

If you lose your job to AI you were not important anyways.

[sage No.53045954]

>>53045251
>It's getting better at doing things we've already been doing for years.

weird, I don't remember having blocks of code automgically generated by my editor years ago
totally won't change my job, no sir

[Anonymous No.53046164]

>>53045954
Fundamentally different =/= different. Obviously AI is doing different things.

[Anonymous No.53046231]

>>53045841
Here's a question though. Let's say your job is one that an AI can't do, but as it turns out, management is one of the things it *can* do. Would you rather work for an organization run by an AI, that disperses revenue fairly among its irreplaceable workers, or for one that disproportionately rewards its eminently replaceable management?

[Anonymous No.53046454]

>>53046231
I would rather live in a AI governed country than having to choose between my grandpa with dementia and a narcissistic sociopathic bilionaire

[Anonymous No.53046473]

>>53044425
should i stop learning japanese?

[Anonymous No.53046903]

So far my least favorite realization about AI is that it's going to mean that the most normie fucking faggots are going to have even more of a say in the trajectory of culture. All these dumb assholes using it to "design websites" or "design shoes" are just slobbering over the most cringey shit. I mean, of course a system designed by humans to appeal to their base instincts churns out content that appeals to base instincts, but it's just going to compound the longer AI trains on these results. ChatGPT hasn't even been unleashed to browse the open internet yet, just imagine how sophisticated these AIs will be when that happens. And people will still use them to generate derivative shit.

[Anonymous No.53046913]

>>53046473

[Anonymous No.53047678]

We should be welcoming ai into our lives. It means mindless jobs that require no thought process such as cashier or McDonald's wagie gets replaced by robots freeing up time for people do whatever they want. Humans were not meant to do the same thing over and over again 8 hours a day for the rest of our lives.

[Anonymous No.53047788]

We've obviously been in an AI-generated world all along. This is just AI within the AI.

[Anonymous No.53047863]

the next step is what little is left of organic human culture and community is obliterated and the internet becomes nothing but the same bots, shills, and artificial images over and over again. then after NWO depopulation 99.9% of the remaining 100m humans will do nothing but manual labor

but idk maybe a few tumblr users will get triggered by it, so its based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.53047948]

>>53046913
I didn’t translate correctly

[Anonymous No.53047952]

>>53046903
Tbey will turn themselves into morlochs. The trick will be figuring out how to profit off it.

[Anonymous No.53048250]

>>53044425
What is the end game here though?
I am an architect and can totally see how developers will just use AI to create cheap and probably even quite good designs.
But it seems like it will also replace pretty much any other job I can think of?
So what actually happens? Do we just agree not to use it?
Or are we about to see a huge portion of society get absolutely destroyed and massive upheaval? I.e. a class of people who are basically the modern blacksmiths, barrel makers, fletchers etc. of the pre industrial revolution all become pointless and unemployable all in the space of a year?
Or as a final alternative we all become unemployed but then somehow it doesn't all turn to shit?
Smart to anons tell me please. It seems like actual hell is coming. The hell of knowing I am without purpose despite years of training

[Anonymous No.53048396]

>>53048250
If tik tok is indicative of anything its that when you give people an access to creative outlets that have a low barrier of entry and low requirements to produce said content, you get absolute garbage across the board. Without meaningful curation you get to see how tasteless and untalented huge swaths of the population are. What is sad is that good design will remain, its just that in time it will be locked away behind paywalls and like everything else will reflect the bifurcation of society. A lot of people are on the long march to morlockdom and it feels like the only real solution is to just try and avoid it for yourself.

t. Also architect but veered a bit more into BIM and software stuff so I have tried to weaponize some of this tech for my own purposes.

All we can do is hope at the end of the day.

[Anonymous No.53048461]

>>53047678
nigga wtf do you think endurance hunting is?

[Anonymous No.53048529]

>>53045099
>The past 5 years have been a massive fucking boom for AI
The AI tech you're talking about maximized 5 years ago. What you're seeing now is people just using it instead of it being toys in labs.

[Anonymous No.53048573]

>>53045244
based

[Anonymous No.53048576]

>>53046913
The translation says "Should I learn Japanese?" in this translation

[Anonymous No.53048628]

>>53048576
>>53047948
ok, but it wasn't designed to translate japanese, train a similar one with just japanese-english books and it will be fine

[Anonymous No.53048736]

>>53048250
I remembered this exact situation from a Kurt Vonnegut novel, and have reproduced it for your convenience (but I am in no way implying that you should kys yourself).

[Anonymous No.53048826]

>>53048736
Tbf all the 50+ year old architects I know (and mechanical engineers/structural ect ect) are all bitter about autocad and revit being a thing but that didn't stop other people from realizing that there was a way to use the new technology to their advantage.

[Anonymous No.53049310]

>lmao i can't wait for all the trucks to go out of jobs because of AI
>nonono not like this, not my jobberino

[Anonymous No.53049317]

>>53044425
What is she actually complaining about?

People who need accurate translations, which is every serious firm, every government, diplomat, high level contractor, every journalist, every newspaper, etc etc actually NEED a human to do it.

Translations are one of the cases where AI falls short. They are not that good at it because languages are highly complex with many layers of meaning that only humans are able to interpret and translate correctly.

Her job, assuming she is good at it, is ironically one of the those that AI can not replace.

[Anonymous No.53050308]

>>53044425
The vampiric psychopathic rulers will take a descent into their coffins. Hopefully this time for the last time. Not that these living corpses come back to haunt us with their life energies time draining ways. AI is not needed.

[Anonymous No.53050960]

>>53048628
Can you train an AI to move goal posts?