/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.52825586]

Looks like Sirgay Betray finally got the memo about the OGs being fucking fed up with his bullshit and switched to a more smuggy/marketable approach like in pic related. Now the question is: is it too late or no?

[Anonymous No.52825607]

>>52825586
This is it, I just unstaked my Link.

I'm NOT going to pay for his cocaine addiction while he crashes the project into oblivion

[Anonymous No.52825661]

token not needed

[Anonymous No.52825679]

>>52825586
Bump for discussion potential

[Anonymous No.52825745]

>>52825586
>Looks like Sirgay Betray finally got the memo about the OGs being fucking fed up
What is this meme about the Link team being at mercy to their token holders?

[Anonymous No.52825749]

>>52825586
Suddenly realising killing the hype for 5 years was a bad idea. They needed to do an eth and establish themselves among top 5 early

[Anonymous No.52825770]

>>52825586
Ah the evil nazi, we got to get rid of them. Hey sergay you still haven’t address the fact that you rigged your community.

[Anonymous No.52825787]

>>52825586

[Anonymous No.52825815]

>>52825745
Ari Juels contracts and angry frogs don't mix well.

[Anonymous No.52825857]

>>52825586
>"$6T+ total value enabled"
meaningless buzzjargon meant to trick linkie smoothbrains into thinking their coins will some day be worth trillions

[Anonymous No.52825872]

>>52825586
>Dynamic NFTs
>provably fair games
I held 5 years for this

[Anonymous No.52825875]

>>52825607
Just unstaked and sold my 100k stack

[Anonymous No.52825912]

>>52825586
Are you insane? Sergey has been talking about Link's insane numbers (present and future) for years.

[Anonymous No.52826007]

>>52825857
yay! MARKETING!

[Anonymous No.52826019]

>>52826007
Why did the internet stop creating new memes at some point a year or two ago? What happened?

[Anonymous No.52826037]

>>52825787
I see this 81k meme and I know it comes from that pic “from the future” but seriously speaking is this even possible? 81k would mean Chainlink becomes a 81 trillion mcap. I don’t see this being realistic unless somehow their is a massive burn on the supply

[Anonymous No.52826044]

>>52826037
Forget about 81k, can it even realistically go above $100?

[Anonymous No.52826051]

>>52826019
I don't know ? A totalitarian psyop maybe where 80%< of humanity was intentionally poisoned?

[Anonymous No.52826064]

aaaand we just dumped 2%! Congrats

[Anonymous No.52826071]

>>52826037
It is a meme. The original assblaster posts had it advised to sell at $20. Anything else is a cope by people who bought in late. Sure it went past but look where it has settled, $20 was a pretty good top call when we were back at 20 cents.

[Anonymous No.52826074]

>>52826037
I can't think of any possible reason why all of the supply might suddenly be locked away, can you?

[Anonymous No.52826078]

>>52826019
A bit like music but on a much faster scale. You had all these unique and different styles, culture and experimentation. Then over time it gets 'solved' and suddenly its what the minimum effort is for maximum reward. Following a set guide. Just like how so much music sounds the same now and has no heart

[Anonymous No.52826091]

>>52825586
>$6T+ total value enabled in 2022 alone
>token price crashes and burns
didn't know I invested in a charity

[Anonymous No.52826093]

>>52826037
it's mostly cope after the fact from laggards who didn't ride the pump from 20c to $50
or worse still, the idiots who were early but didn't sell the obvious top

[Anonymous No.52826105]

>>52826019
we made enough memes to cover most situations that come up
why reinvent the wheel

[Anonymous No.52826121]

>>52826037
>unless somehow their is a massive burn on the supply
this will happen for all intents and purposes when 99% of tokens become staked, newfren

[Anonymous No.52826132]

>>52826121
and until then sergey will continue to dump tokens and burn money. well if it gets that far.

[Anonymous No.52826165]

>>52826105
>your mind on discord and HRT
>we

[Anonymous No.52826276]

>>52826037
>81 trillion mcap
Hello retard

[Anonymous No.52826379]

>>52826276
to put this number in perspective the global economy lost 80 trillion recently between the cracks of gaap reporting standards
so yeah it isnt as unbelievable as you think

[Anonymous No.52826403]

>>52826379
>Link marketcap will be worth more than the Europe and America's GDP combined
This is beyond schizo tier

[Anonymous No.52826404]

>>52826379
market cap is a meme
all you're doing is multiplying price times total supply
well what if 99% of the total supply is locked up and not going anywhere ever?

[Anonymous No.52826420]

>>52826105
you are a low iq tranny and will kill yourself =^)

[Anonymous No.52826441]

>>52826403
again they lost that much % of gdp in reporting criteria gaps and guess what the world economy still goes on
also gdp is more of a meme number that mc valuation
this cycle total crypto MC was 20% of eu gdp, this would be consider beyond insane in 2016

i am not saying this happens next year but over a decade

[Anonymous No.52826444]

>>52826121
Why has the release of staking not made ANY noticeable impact on price then?

[Anonymous No.52826462]

>>52826105
You could argue that the same thing happened with fffuuuuu memes but they still kept evolving from there

[Anonymous No.52826477]

>>52826444
Checked.
The stakers are all low iq streetshitters, you'll never get a cogent answer from them.
Meanwhile, mcfatfuck just dumped another 14.5 million unneeded tokens on them lmao.

[Anonymous No.52826482]

>>52826444
checked. we are so early.

[Anonymous No.52826494]

>>52826462
i suppose but those memes were obviously crude and in need of improvement

[Anonymous No.52826501]

>>52826019
There never were new memes is just new templates for the same bullshit. Understand this and you will be happy.

[Anonymous No.52826602]

>>52826019
Are you stupid? We got *hits pipe* within the last 2 years.

[Anonymous No.52826640]

>>52825586
WOWWWWWWW. Is there a HECKIN INFOGRAPHIC to show all of the darn TVL!?!???

[Anonymous No.52826658]

>>52825912
Anyone can make up crazy numbers. Sergey isnt gonna learn his lesson that you cant just scam people until hes locked up. Hopefully soon

[Anonymous No.52826661]

>>52826037
$2000 to $5000 was the more honest evaluation.
But so many things happened since the initial speculation.

I don't know and wish to take my distance from this project to live a happier life.
Sergey betrayed us by hiding the reason for the delay and treating us like second zone investors.
I am sick of having to speculate on his behavior and his roadmap.
That's not normal.
Add to that that Linkpool just created the most potent fud against the LINK token and it's really fucked.
The LINK token is exactly the same thing to Chainlink Labs as the LPL token was to Linkpool.
A promise with no officially recognized ownership of the company running it.

If Linkpool can rug pull us with their LPL token and change the terms on a whim, why should the LINK token have any value?

The DECO patent and other innovations owned by Chainlink Labs are extremely valuable, but you don't own them through the LINK token.
If Sergey decides to change his token economics with a 3rd version in 5 years he could change it completely and fuck us over the same way as Linkpool did.
The only promise we have is the trust in a human being who is associated in the SDL corruption through the Chainlink Labs participation.
When you buy a company stock you buy real ownership of a company which is protected by law.
You don't have this with the current tokens if they don't come from tokenized stocks.

The only person I still trust is Ari because he is both an academic and has some form of spiritual development with an understanding of the past.
But he doesn't run the company.

[Anonymous No.52826674]

>>52825749
i hate all of you so much

[Anonymous No.52826688]

>>52826661
Sounds like you would be a lot happier just selling it all and investing in nice, real stocks, that confer real ownership of real companies.

[Anonymous No.52826719]

>>52826688
That's part of my plan, but as an investor I have to wait until a recovery of the crypto market to sell my investment at least at its average valuation around $20.
The stock market is also in a shitty state with many stocks losing -90% of their valuations just like crypto.

There is a timing to everything, and unfortunately I am forced to hold for now.
But I already have an exit plan.

Chainlink doesn't deserve this much of my attention when I see the results of what they deliver and how they treat me.

[Anonymous No.52826736]

>>52826719
sucks for you, i'm kind of into it. Maybe I should start edging.

[Anonymous No.52826745]

>>52825661
But VALUE IS ENABLED!

[Anonymous No.52826764]

>>52826661
if you don't trust sergey then leave. staking apy and early access was a generous gift to long time investors.
this is a good question tho, sdl was devastating and spit in the face of the very people who helped fund and develop the project - how do we know that other companies won't do the same thing with their token?

[Anonymous No.52826811]

To be fair, no other company would give away 25% of their revenue to a few 100 autistic loners from a Mongolian basket weaving forum when that revenue might be significant. Imagine the greed that's behind what lp have done. I'd probably have done the same

[Anonymous No.52826879]

>>52826736
Your situation is different, but it's not healthy to be all in one investment.
Imagine living like this for 5 years and getting greeted by the ultimate betrayal on the day you expected the situation to improve with a new path for adoption.

Most of the original investors had the ETH chart as a reference and didn't expect to wait a decade when those who invested in ETH waited 1 year and then got even more later.
The LINK/BTC chart is some incredible level of market manipulation fuckery and does not make any sense for a token which should be independent from BTC and is running a completely different service.

The truth is this is a war of crypto cartels, and Chainlink is the weakest one barely allowed to survive by CZ.
Sergey chose to ignore this reality until half a year ago until it exploded in his face with the crash under double digits.

Eric once said that you had to let the CEO manage their company in their own way and let them do mistakes so that they learn while giving your support after. But this is exactly the situation we are in.
Sergey was naive and believed in a utopia like many of us and chose to ignore the problems for years because of a form of laziness and unrealistic hope.

Had he not made an attempt to finally learn and change this year I would have exited this project already.
But he is still weak and largely unprepared for what is coming his way and will never recover the lost ground of power his competitors gained during the bull run.

You should also know that what Sergey want is different from what we want.
Sergey wants to create a new system and we want financial freedom and power.

It's not certain the desires of these two groups will always align.
Sergey would be willing to give up most profitability of the Chainlink network if it allowed it to become the new https.
He doesn't do this for money.

However this is not the case for us. We would take a very heavy hit if Sergey will be forced to make a choice between those two one day.

[Anonymous No.52826905]

>>52826879
>his competitors
There are none. There quite simply aren't any. There are haters, including cartels of haters, but nobody is in competition with Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.52826926]

>>52825586
>provably fair games
>endorsed Lady Luck coin
lol wanna know what proves fair games? Open source.

[Anonymous No.52826936]

>>52826764
The only answer to this issue is the creation of a legal framework and forced conversion into a company ownership when a token is sold on those promises.
This will become the norm with enough time and will cause all the scammers in the past cycles to face justice even if it takes a decade.

There is already an implementation of an initial solution with DAOs incorporating a company into a token.
There are also initial versions of tokenized real estate owning companies.

The tokenization of assets will have to become the norm in the crypto space too.
If there is something to learn from Linkpool is that you should never trust anyone and treat them like a psychopath.
The only thing you can trust is established law, past actions and incentive for action.

Johny had an incentive to rug pull.
I hope this will never be the case for Sergey.

I want to leave this space but I am stuck for now.
Maybe I will manage to get my exit next year finally.

[Anonymous No.52826987]

>>52826811
You sell 25% of your company ownership through an ICO and then decide you don't like it 5 years later.
The condition was bad for them but don't forget that they started with nothing and had no money.

Linkpool would not exist without those ICO investors and they chose to fuck them over.
We didn't ask to get 25% of their income as dividend and could have understood if they needed more capital for investment.
But the one thing which was unacceptable was trying to remove us from it.

Receiving 25% of the company profits minus the running costs means having top class A ownership stocks from a company and owning 25% of that company.

The correct answer to this situation was to keep the LPL token and properly recognize its status as the ownership of the company by making it an officially tokenized stock, but to explain they would stop dividend payments for a few years to enable more growth and to airdrop the SDR token to the LPL holders as a bonus.

There was no reason they couldn't do this other than greed and corruption and their attempt to force people to migrate quickly before staking shows they understood quite well what they were doing.

[Anonymous No.52827134]

Additionally instead of airdropping the new protocol token they could have exchanged the existing LPLa token for it which was the initial staking allowance.

There was a correct solution to this issue, they knew about this and they certainly consciously ignored it.

[Anonymous No.52827157]

>>52827134
>There was a correct solution to this issue, they knew about this and they certainly consciously ignored it.
>https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13332436/officers
registered on the 13. of April. They didn't ignore it, it was pure malice.

[42 No.52827248]

brb gym

[Anonymous No.52827280]

>>52827248
>https://chainlinktoday.com/dont-get-got-avoiding-the-most-common-crypto-scams/
>Don’t Get Got: Avoiding The Most Common Crypto Scams
>Eric Jaurena
>March 20, 2021

[Anonymous No.52827284]

>>52827157
It’s wild how they absolutely can’t stand /biz/tards making it, ostensibly because we say kike and nigger, but then SBF admits in private correspondence that woke behaviour is just a shibboleth to prove that you’re playing the game.
So the reality is that they don’t want us to make it simply because we’re more honest than them. So honestly we just skip the whole performance. In the context of a global automated truth system, it’s hard not to see the irony.

[Anonymous No.52827311]

>>52826071
Anything else is “a cope” huh Shartesh?

[Anonymous No.52827324]

>>52826879
>competitors
>he doesn't know

Get a load of this goy

[Anonymous No.52827325]

>>52827284
If they get rid of us humanity is over. They'll eat each other. Literally. They are utterly insane.

[Anonymous No.52827413]

>>52827284
>sergey is a hypocritical fatfuck with cognitive dissonance

If anyone took a simple glance at this fatfuck midwit they would realize that he is nothing more than a parasite. He follows bernie on twitter while registering his company in the cayman islands to evade taxes. Bernie would hate him and has spoken out against this more times than mcfatfuck repeated truth>trust.

Mcfatfuck also claims to like stoic philosophers such as seneca while being a gluttonous sack of cells. Seneca would unironically tell him to kill himself.

Sergey's entire existence is a sham. He knows it, we know it and he knows we know it.

[Anonymous No.52827422]

none of this is required on the internet computer so i'm not interested.

[Anonymous No.52827427]

There is our little blockchain expert.
Why don't you tell us about your "oracle networks"

[Anonymous No.52827432]

>>52825586
dfg

[Anonymous No.52827474]

>>52827413
>Seneca would unironically tell him to kill himself.
Nero told this fat fuck to kill himself and he did.

[Anonymous No.52827501]

>>52827474
Someone on /biz needs to be the next Nero and tell mcfatfuck parasite to follow his hero then.

[Anonymous No.52827502]

>>52826987
based, thanks for fighting for us bro. im quite demoralized from this linkpool situation. how could they do this to us?

[Anonymous No.52827518]

>>52826019
>the meme-makers have unplugged
they know what's coming

[Anonymous No.52827551]

>>52825745
>What is this meme about the Link team being at mercy to their token holders?
It's a psyop to push a SEC regulation agenda.

We all know tokens aren't securities
But the "link marines" on /biz/ start treating it like a security, as though they're shareholders in a company, and the company owes them respect and consideration
Then the SEC will have grounds to regulate the LINK token as a security

I'm convinced it's all a false flag operation
Or foreign operators trying to involve the SEC to force USA token holders out

[Anonymous No.52827594]

>>52827551
take meds

[Anonymous No.52827618]

>>52827594
any time someone says "take your meds" the comment they are responding to is almost certainly 100% on the mark.

[Anonymous No.52827639]

>>52827594
Well it's either that, or the token holders who think the team "owes them something" are just fucking morons.
Actually, that's more plausible.

[Anonymous No.52827647]

>>52825586
>self-repaying loans
people are still falling for this after what we've seen so far

[Anonymous No.52827698]

>>52827647
Fucking buzzword after buzzword.I’m starting to hate this fat fuck so much

[Anonymous No.52827955]

>>52826936
Relying on legal frameworks is just kicking the can down the road. Instead of McFatFuck, you have to trust a different set of "people" who at the highest level will use the very thing that's supposed to protect you, to fuck you, just in the same way.

The only real answer is ironically what this entire space is supposed to be predicated upon, which are advanced systems of assurance that allow us to not have to trust each other, ie; smartcontracts etc. But as of right now, all of that seems to just be smoke that's being blown up all of our assholes, and I say that as a 5 digit LINK holder since 2017. The SDL situation is truly some subhuman judas behavior and I hope that Horserimmer and all involved will too eventually get their comeuppance. But who knows, maybe this is all like one of those fucked up mayan human sacrifice situations wherein the mayans would burn some portion of their wealth, be it human beings or otherwise, in order to make them less attractive targets to competing tribes and cities, thereby making it more likely to keep their remaining wealth, as opposed to being raided and potentially losing all of their wealth as a consequence. In the end I hope that both SDL cucks and us LINK cucks will reap greater rewards down the line than we otherwise would have things not have turned out the way that did so far. Hopium no copium.

[Anonymous No.52827974]

>>52827955
>The SDL situation is truly some subhuman judas behavior and I hope that Horserimmer and all involved will too eventually get their comeuppance
Anon the evil holders saying bad things on the internet are the real problem here and not what the awesome former LPL team have done, let's not forget that. #facts

[Anonymous No.52828001]

>>52827974
you're right. hurting somebodies fee fees justifies being robbed. being a meanie on the intwerwebz is a baaaad no no

[Anonymous No.52828015]

>>52826037
The reason why 81k is a possibility is because of the security and trustless computation that blockchains offer as well as the network effect of the token in relation to nodes and decentralized oracle networks. Think of it like this, 25m link tokens just got locked up for the foreseeable future in just one service offered by Chainlink, the definitive truth of the price of Ethereum in relation to US dollars. Now you can start to apply the other services offered by Chainlink to this same network effect. How much security does chainlink’s BTC/USD need? What about the other price feeds that are widely used? Notice, I haven’t mentioned how much Dapps pay for these feeds to be used. Simply the security. Now what about other services such as the eventual CCIP release, which would be the definitive truth of what happened on chain X relayed to chain Y or even chain X relayed to chain A through chain Z or better yet, Chains A-Z back to a central server? How much security does that need?Now, how much are Dapp developers willing to pay to beat out their competitors? So now theoretically we can get to a point where most of the Chainlink total supply has been locked up in these services. But people still need to buy link to pay for these services. If you can understand the possibilities offered by blockchains and DLT, then it’s only reasonable that the biggest chasm to cross is from the real world to blockchains, similarly from blockchains to the real world. If there was only one middleman(Oracle) for that solution then suddenly that is the biggest attack vector as well as the largest value capture. We now introduce Chainlinks Decentralized Oracle Network, in laymen’s terms, a network of networks that come to consensus about what has happened outside of blockchains to be used in blockchains and a network of networks that come to consensus about what happened in blockchains to be used outside of blockchains.

[Anonymous No.52828050]

>>52828015
I also love to gargle shit, and roll around in my own vomit. I’m half retarded, I worship Sergey and would happily huff his farts. Link is my favorite coin and I’m a Chainlink marine, let’s go Linkies.

[Anonymous No.52828228]

>>52828001
It should also be noted that third-party liquid staking solutions like @stakedotlink also exists

15 nodes have combined their stake allotments, where stakers can get a liquid $stLINK token

Such systems are external to v0.1, Chainlink can’t guarantee its performance/security

[Anonymous No.52828272]

How does it make the ESL subhuman slime feel that I am literally never selling? I am also earning FREE link by staking not doing shit. I’ll bet that gets you curries angry. Imagine working 14 hours a day fudding Link. Your life’s are miserable, I almost feel sorry for you

[Anonymous No.52828336]

>>52828272
their lives are almost as sad as the node operators who spend endless hours lifting weights and shilling LINk lol

[Anonymous No.52829326]

>>52827284
That’s deep

[Anonymous No.52829419]

>>52828015
Stop spoonfeeding retards, everyone that matters already bought. It’s not enough that I make it anymore, i also need to see them fail.

[Anonymous No.52829908]

>>52825661
this is old fud, we've moved onto unable to unstake while LINK goes to zero.

[Anonymous No.52829916]

>>52829908
>we've moved onto unable to unstake while LINK goes to zero.
this
please keep up with the FUD marching orders
t. bulgarian management

[Anonymous No.52829937]

>>52827284
very well put. i think its only natural to be public facing and face saving in those positions its not about being woke or playing a game its about being respectful. i dont even think they necessarily hate /biz/ users "making it" .

[Anonymous No.52829987]

>>52825586
What oracle problem? I’ve been on biz for 5 years and I’ve seen link posts about the “oracle problem” being solved hundreds of times but I’ve never seen anyone ever discuss what the fuck an oracle is, or accuse other coins of having an oracle problem. Is this just buzz talk?

[Anonymous No.52829996]

>>52826071
>The original assblaster posts had it advised to sell at $20.
Holy fuck someone else who was actually here. Listening to nu/biz/ drone on and on about $500 link or whatever is latefag cope. Assblaster isn't even brought up anymore, but he also said 200k was the make-it, and to sell at $20. Nigger was dead on, pretty amazing. Baggies bought the pump narrative and never sold. Hate to see it

[Anonymous No.52829997]

>>52829987
It’s pretty fucking weird, all the fuds turns out to be true. There is literally no oracle problem

[Anonymous No.52829998]

>>52829908
But this isn't fud, this is what will really happen.

[Anonymous No.52830010]

Oracles? More like snoracles, or boracles. Zzzzz..... Lmao.

[Anonymous No.52830066]

>>52829997
SWIFT banking has been making instantaneous transactions at bank machines for decades and seem not to have a problem with double spending. I'm note sure they want Sergey, his nodes, his validators (like the reliable Johnny) and parasitical token stakers anywhere near them. Sounds like an oracle problem.

[Anonymous No.52830071]

>>52829987
>I’ve been on biz for 5 years
>I’ve never seen anyone ever discuss what the fuck an oracle is
Pick one larp

[Anonymous No.52830099]

>>52830071
Types all of this instead of just saying what an oracle is and why it’s been a big problem in crypto until link

[Anonymous No.52830108]

Why would huge financial institutions trust a shady Russian company with a PnD shitcoin to solve their oracle problem?

[Anonymous No.52830123]

>>52830071
And btw I’m sure at some point I read someone describing it in some big wall of text full of buzzwords, but 99.9% of all mentions of “oracles” on here is just linklets celebrating that the oracle problem is finally solved. I doubt most of you holders even have a clue what it is either.

[Anonymous No.52830160]

>>52830123
>>52830099
>>52830099
>>52830123
>t. xrp bagholder, ada top buyer, icp holder, gme amc ape.

[Anonymous No.52830167]

>>52827413
The guy who invites Sam and Mashinsky to his conference is a scammer?? No way

[Anonymous No.52830215]

>>52830160
It’s weird how you guys will post to insult me when you could show me how dumb I am by just clearly explaining what an oracle is and why it’s a problem

[Anonymous No.52830248]

>>52830215
Here u go
https://blog.goodaudience.com/chainlink-the-missing-piece-to-the-god-protocol-fd455dde92ab

[Anonymous No.52830379]

>>52826936
>>52827955
For fucksake just hedge with a couple hundred ethereum and sell your eth between ‘24-25 when it hits $8K or so. I was a massive retard who got rich from LINK in 2020 and didn’t rotate, I just roundtripped all the way. No one could have foreseen us getting kiked the way we did last year, I still can’t even comprehend how retarded the market was but it was ultimately my fault for not diversifying and thinking everyone else would see the obvious speculative value of chainlink.

Not happening next cycle. Going to accumulate a massive stack of LINK at these hilarious levels but will also hedge the fuck out of it with enough ETH to make me a millionaire after taxes.

[Anonymous No.52830533]

The funny thing here is they didn't solve the oracle problem at all.

[Anonymous No.52830536]

>>52825586
>dynamic nfts
>provable fair games

Fucking kek.

[Anonymous No.52830657]

>>52830533
They kinda sorta did though

[Anonymous No.52830690]

>>52826661
Nice watching token not needed fud evolve in the wild

[Anonymous No.52830712]

>>52826661
>the reason for the delay
What delay?

[Anonymous No.52830917]

>>52829987
He gets ripped on for this, but to be fair for 2.5 years now the real posting is sparse and everyone is just carpetbomming the fud
I mean just look at this thread even now when we know this is a disaster to our own bags they keep it up, all worth it I suppose to have kept 5 redditors from buying in low
I have said it here before but next cycle we, us, have to actively promote this if we don't want to wait another 5 years
Call itself is terrible at explaining themselves to retard level and guess where we have ample experience in, yes retardation

[Anonymous No.52830934]

>>52829987
>What oracle problem?
see >>52830657

[Anonymous No.52830942]

What is a dynamic nft?

What in the fuck do they mean if reached 6 trillion of value?

What a lying scamming piece of shit. Link acolytes will just claim I don’t understand but never explain shit

[Anonymous No.52830948]

>>52830942
>What is a dynamic nft?
>Link acolytes never explain shit
Chainlink has been talking about this and explaining it for many months.

[Anonymous No.52831011]

>>52830536
>Link literally Funfair-tier now

[Anonymous No.52831035]

>>52830215
>It’s weird how you guys will post to insult me when you could show me how dumb I am
It’s weird how you can’t even google this shit and make up your own mind.

[Anonymous No.52831648]

>>52830099
>>52830123
You should also know that as a true OG I'm not gonna spoonfed you and you should dyor gullible newfag, but I'll make an exception and I'll try to be as brainlet-friendly as I can since (you) are the listener.
So, what is an oracle, it's that piece of code that brings real world data to (in our case) the blockchain.
What is the oracle problem, the impossibility to verify that the data is legit in a trustless manner, without a trusted entity.
How chainlink solved the oracle problem, by setting up a consensus mechanism that rewards/punishes the good/bad actors in the decentralized network for giving right/wrong data feeds.
Now gtfo kiddo

[Anonymous No.52831689]

>>52825586
>DECO
no
>Mixicles
not mentioned
>SWIFT
nah
>Town Crier
nope
>CCIP
lmao no
>Dynamic NFTs
wow nice work Chainlink

[Anonymous No.52831694]

>>52831689
Wtf is a dynamic nft? Let me guess it’ll be forgotten

[Anonymous No.52831712]

>>52826019
4chan is not really at the forefront anymore, twitter and tik tok are bustling with new meme formats everyday, incels kinda out of the loop nowadays

[Anonymous No.52832702]

>>52827955
The blockchain word's purpose is to be connected to the real world.
All the value of the Chainlink network will come from tokenization of assets.

What kind of insurance will you use to ensure that a token remains connected to the asset it is supposed to represent without a strong legal framework?
If we don't get a legal framework this means we will need to create a giant insurance company to insure every tokenized asset in the world.
This insurance protocol will then become the real layer 0 and be more valuable than the Chainlink network.

The reason we thought Chainlink was valuable was because it was supposed to be this last level of insurance.
If we don't get a legal framework to make it so the final boss of token will appear soon and eat every token pretending to give some form of insurance hiding a rug pull.

Chainlink connects data from the real world to a smart contract.
If this data is corrupt with no recovery you are fucked.

Linkpool and every node operator who joined the SDL scam just destroyed all their reputation in a single day.
Everyone will avoid them in the future when staking v1.0 will allow the creation of simple alternative because no one will trust them not to scam them the same way they scammed their investors.


>It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently.
Warren Buffett

[Anonymous No.52832746]

>>52826879
>Sergey wants to create a new system and we want financial freedom and power.
>It's not certain the desires of these two groups will always align.
this is good take but:
>Sergey would be willing to give up most profitability of the Chainlink network if it allowed it to become the new https
I guess you didnt see Sergeys tweet about tcp/ip. Also Sergey has ruthlessly built a monopoly and bought patents like Gates did when his ideological peers built open source.

[Anonymous No.52832756]

>>52830379
My hedge got stolen by FTX.
I was using it as trading collateral and trading it...

I take this as a message to not hold any of the coins I don't hold anymore.
It's insane how I manage to get hit by a new catastrophic event every month.

I don't really know what to expect for the future, but it is very dangerous to hold crypto after 2024 and we may have to take profits if we finally get a pump next year before that.

[Anonymous No.52832805]

>>52830917
Just give up and learn trading.
If Chainlink can't pump it means the team failed to deliver a valuable product and to market it properly.
They failed to release staking during the bull market and releasing it now is almost meaningless if not for the hope to get the v1.0 of staking in 2 years.
We are effectively similar to jannies in our attempts to shill this when everyone just keeps shitting on us.
The only difference is that we hope to make money for this, but there are many opportunities and it's not a good idea to become focused on only one thing as we will miss out on other opportunities.

Learn to recognize relative strength in projects and trade those instead.
You are free and don't have to support Chainlink anymore like a mindless zombie.
You paid the price for this freedom through the 2 year bear market.

[Anonymous No.52832815]

>>52826019
>>52831712
4chan died the moment Hiro sold out the moderation power to government agencies.
Memes can only exist in a free space when there is a truth to share.

[Anonymous No.52832822]

>>52832746
You don't own those patents.
The Chainlink Labs company is a separate entity of the LINK token exactly like the Linkpool LPL token is separate from Linkpool the company.

[Anonymous No.52832982]

>>52825586
Token not needed